2003 Report on the Health of Colorado's Forests

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2003 Report on the Health of Colorado's Forests January 12, 2004 The 2003 Report on the Health of Colorado’s Forests is the third installment in a series of publications intended to expand Coloradans’ knowledge of and interest in our state’s forest resources. Beginning in 2001, each of these Reports has presented valuable information on the diversity of our forests and highlighted some of the key issues that shape their current condition. At the heart of these documents is a challenge: What do we want from our forests and what do they need in order to continue to provide our desired benefits? The members of Colorado’s Forestry Advisory Board have presented this question to numerous audiences, ranging from local civic groups to state officials and various professional associations. A number of communities have taken-up our challenge and begun engaging their residents in a dialogue about the condition and stewardship of their forests. With the passage of the Healthy Forests Restoration Act (H.R. 1904) in Congress, the need for local involvement in forest management becomes even more acute. Provisions in the bill give priority for funding and assistance to communities with a wildfire protection plan in place. While hazardous fuels are only one component of a forest’s condition, this new law should give local governments additional incentive to consider and plan for the health of their forest resources. Beginning in 2004, each annual Report will focus on the status of, research on, and management issues related to a particular forest type or combination of types. This series will commence with an exploration of the pinyon-juniper and ponderosa pine forests that characterize much of the state’s high-risk wildland-urban interface. These focused reports will build on the foundation of previous editions by providing readers with a more detailed look at the particular forests that surround them, that characterize their watersheds, or that sustain important wildlife habitat. With this information we can begin working toward strategies that address the unique needs and opportunities of particular forest ecosystems. Thank you for taking time to consider these important issues. I hope you will find this Report a valuable resource for stimulating dialogue and promoting action in your own communities. Sincerely, Nancy Fishering Chairperson, Colorado Forestry Advisory Board Colorado Forestry Advisory Board Members: Don Ament Commissioner of Agriculture Tom Stone Tom Borden Commissioner, Eagle County, Colorado Private Landowner, Fort Collins, Colorado Greg Walcher Nancy Fishering Director, Colorado Dept. of Natural Resources Colorado Timber Industry Association Al Yates Doug Robotham Former President, Colorado State University Director, Trust for Public Land - Colorado 2003 Report on the Health of Colorado’s Forests 1 2003 Report on the Health of Colorado’s Forests Executive Summary Mild winters, warm, dry summers, and consecutive years of severe drought continue to place added pressure on Colorado’s already stressed forests. The outbreak of pinyon ips beetles that took much of the state by surprise last year expanded and began to reveal its true impact on the pinyon-juniper landscape of southern and southwestern Colorado. Infestations of mountain pine beetle have reached epidemic proportions in some locations and are dramatically increasing throughout the ponderosa and lodgepole pine forests of the state’s central mountains. Spruce beetle activity continues to intensify in the northcentral region affected by the 1997 Routt Divide blowdown, despite nearly two-thirds of the blowdown being consumed by fires in 2002. And the discovery of a previously unknown Eurasian elm bark beetle gave urban foresters new cause for concern. The summer of 2003 did not bring a repeat of the previous year’s dramatic wildfires, but the challenge of addressing fire-related impacts remained. Large fire incidents burned approxi- mately 675,000 acres in 2002, leaving many critical watersheds in need of both emergency and long-term rehabilitation. This year’s relatively mild fire season gave landowners and managers some breathing room to strengthen the public and resource protection treatments they initiated in the wake of last year’s events. The Colorado General Assembly expressed their concern for the state’s forest resources during their 2003 session by passing legislation that directs state land management agencies to work with the Colorado State Forest Service in actively managing all state-owned forests to meet a range of public values. This legislation facilitates the expansion of several already successful partnerships between the State Forest Service and the Department of Natural Resources. Sig- nificant new projects are underway that will set a standard for landscape-scale fuels reduction in the state. Change is natural in forested ecosystems. Even stand-replacing events can be part of the normal cycle of regeneration for forest types such as lodgepole pine and spruce-fir. But in lower elevation forests such as ponderosa pine and mixed conifer, the impacts of landscape- scale change can be devastating. For Coloradans, the central challenge remains one of informa- tion and choice. What do we want from our forests and what do they need in order to continue to provide our desired benefits? The goal of this and previous Reports on the Health of Colorado’s Forests is to inform and promote public dialogue regarding the management of our state’s forest resources. Beginning in 2004, the format for these Reports will change to one that focuses on the status of and issues related to a particular forest type or combination of types. This series will begin with an explo- ration of the lower elevation pinyon-juniper and ponderosa pine forests that characterize much of the state’s high-risk wildland-urban interface. These forests have been most affected by previous decades of fire exclusion and changing land management objectives. They also offer the greatest opportunity for diverse stakeholders to work together at the local level on projects that increase community protection while improving forest conditions on the ground. 2003 Report on the Health of Colorado’s Forests 1 Insect and Disease Activity Insect and disease activity during 2003 continued to reflect the heavy hand of long-term drought. Even normally drought-hardy trees such as juniper show signs of extreme distress in several parts of the state. Both native and non-native insects are taking full advantage of this vulnerable forest condition to feed and reproduce at extraordinary levels. Relatively mild weather in recent years has further compounded the situation by allowing bark beetles and other insects to survive in greater numbers through the winter, begin their annual move- ments earlier in the spring, and continue their activity longer into the fall. A graphic indicator of the state’s abnormally dry conditions occurred in southwestern Colorado where selected aspen forests took the unusual step of producing prolific amounts of seed in mid-summer. Though still alive, these trees redirected their energy toward “emergency” seed production that would provide for continuation of the spe- cies. Visible impacts of low water levels are also evident in widespread mortality of cot- 1. An aspen forest in southwest Colorado displays tonwoods throughout the San Luis Valley, on extreme drought stress by “going to seed” in the eastern plains and in the southwestern midsummer. corner of the state. Although most of Colorado’s insect and disease activity involves native species, the discov- ery of an exotic elm bark beetle in many parts of the state reveals the far-reaching impacts of international commerce and highlights the importance of vigilant detection and treatment of non-native pests. The observation of white pine blister rust cankers in previously unaffected locations and species also gave Colorado forest managers additional cause for concern. Natural cycles of insect and disease outbreaks are an important component of a functioning forest ecosystem.1 The most effective way to reduce large-scale damage in areas of high public value is to reduce stress or alleviate competition, thereby restoring natural forest resilience, prior to insect or disease attack. Once infestation has begun, management options are limited. Pinyon Ips Beetle (Ips confusus) The native pinyon ips beetle continues to decimate pinyon pines throughout the southern Front Range and southwestern Colorado, killing an estimated 1 million trees and causing up to 80 percent mortality in some areas of the state. Although it is not regarded as an aggressive beetle, the insect is taking advantage of ideal conditions created by long-term drought and overly dense pinyon-juniper landscapes. 1 For additional information on Colorado’s forest types, historic conditions, and current forest health issues, see The 2001 Report on the Condition of Colorado’s Forests and The 2002 Report on the Health of Colorado’s Forests, available on the Web at http://forestry.state.co.us. 2 2003 Report on the Health of Colorado’s Forests 2003 Report on the Health of Colorado’s Forests 3 For the first time, the United States Forest Service (USFS) is conducting special aerial surveys to delineate the range and severity of this infestation. Although the project is not yet complete, early results from the Cortez area are indicative of the larger problem. Along the Front Range, pinyon ips beetles are now affecting native pinyon stands as far north as Poncha Springs and the Garden of the Gods near Colorado Springs. The explosion of pinyon ips in areas of the southeastern plains caps a long-term trend in pinyon pine decline that has resulted in forests characterized by mostly dead-standing and deadfall pinyon. Mortality is increasingly evident in Huerfano and Las Animas Counties. La Junta and surrounding communities report that the beetles have moved out of the forest and into town killing up to 80 percent of the pinyon along streets and in neighborhoods. Land managers and volunteers are working at Lathrop State Park near La Veta to harvest and remove heavily infested pinyon stands in an effort to slow the beetle’s expansion.
Recommended publications
  • Biology and Management of the Dutch Elm Disease Vector, Hylurgopinus Rufipes Eichhoff (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Manitoba By
    Biology and Management of the Dutch Elm Disease Vector, Hylurgopinus rufipes Eichhoff (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Manitoba by Sunday Oghiakhe A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Entomology University of Manitoba Winnipeg Copyright © 2014 Sunday Oghiakhe Abstract Hylurgopinus rufipes, the native elm bark beetle (NEBB), is the major vector of Dutch elm disease (DED) in Manitoba. Dissections of American elms (Ulmus americana), in the same year as DED symptoms appeared in them, showed that NEBB constructed brood galleries in which a generation completed development, and adult NEBB carrying DED spores would probably leave the newly-symptomatic trees. Rapid removal of freshly diseased trees, completed by mid-August, will prevent spore-bearing NEBB emergence, and is recommended. The relationship between presence of NEBB in stained branch sections and the total number of NEEB per tree could be the basis for methods to prioritize trees for rapid removal. Numbers and densities of overwintering NEBB in elm trees decreased with increasing height, with >70% of the population overwintering above ground doing so in the basal 15 cm. Substantial numbers of NEBB overwinter below the soil surface, and could be unaffected by basal spraying. Mark-recapture studies showed that frequency of spore bearing by overwintering beetles averaged 45% for the wild population and 2% for marked NEBB released from disease-free logs. Most NEBB overwintered close to their emergence site, but some traveled ≥4.8 km before wintering. Studies comparing efficacy of insecticides showed that chlorpyrifos gave 100% control of overwintering NEBB for two years as did bifenthrin: however, permethrin and carbaryl provided transient efficacy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Identification of Ophiostoma Novo-Ulmi Subsp. Americana from Portland Elms
    The Identification of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi subsp. americana from Portland Elms by Benjamin K. Au A PROJECT Submitted to Oregon State University University Honors College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Honor Baccalaureate of Science in Biology (Honors Scholar) Presented on March 5, 2014 Commencement June 2014 AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Benjamin K. Au for the degree of Honors Baccalaureate of Science in Biology presented on March 5th, 2014. Title: The Identification of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi subsp. americana from Portland Elms. Abstract approved: Melodie Putnam Dutch elm disease (DED) is a disease of elm trees caused by three species of Ascomycota fungi: Ophiostoma ulmi, Ophiostoma novo-ulmi, and Ophiostoma himal-ulmi. There are also two subspecies of O. novo-ulmi: subsp. americana and subsp. novo-ulmi. The pathogen is spread by bark beetles, which inhabit and traverse different elms. O. novo-ulmi is noted to be more aggressive than O. ulmi, and thus many areas in which O. ulmi had been dominant are being replaced by O. novo-ulmi. Epidemiology of DED has been studied in areas including Spain, New Zealand, and Austria. Studies of the disease in the United States are not as prevalent. This study attempts to identify to subspecies, 14 fungal strains isolated from diseased elms growing in Portland, Oregon. Goals include determination of the relative abundance of O. novo-ulmi and O. ulmi. Most elm surveys categorize diseased elms as having signs of DED, but do not specify the causal species or subspecies. Another goal is to develop methods that can be used to differentiate between the species and subspecies of Ophiostoma, based on growth rate and polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch Elm Disease Pathogen Transmission by the Banded Elm Bark Beetle Scolytus Schevyrewi
    For. Path. 43 (2013) 232–237 doi: 10.1111/efp.12023 © 2013 Blackwell Verlag GmbH Dutch elm disease pathogen transmission by the banded elm bark beetle Scolytus schevyrewi By W. R. Jacobi1,3, R. D. Koski1 and J. F. Negron2 1Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA; 2U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest Research Station, Fort Collins, CO USA; 3E-mail: [email protected] (for correspondence) Summary Dutch Elm Disease (DED) is a vascular wilt disease of Ulmus species (elms) incited in North America primarily by the exotic fungus Ophios- toma novo-ulmi. The pathogen is transmitted via root grafts and elm bark beetle vectors, including the native North American elm bark beetle, Hylurgopinus rufipes and the exotic smaller European elm bark beetle, Scolytus multistriatus. The banded elm bark beetle, Scolytus schevyrewi, is an exotic Asian bark beetle that is now apparently the dominant elm bark beetle in the Rocky Mountain region of the USA. It is not known if S. schevyrewi will have an equivalent vector competence or if management recommendations need to be updated. Thus the study objectives were to: (i) determine the type and size of wounds made by adult S. schevyrewi on branches of Ulmus americana and (ii) determine if adult S. schevyrewi can transfer the pathogen to American elms during maturation feeding. To determine the DED vectoring capability of S. schevyrewi, newly emerged adults were infested with spores of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi and then placed with either in-vivo or in-vitro branches of American elm trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood and Wood Products As Pathways for Introduction of Exotic Bark Beetles and Woodborers
    Wood and Wood Products as Pathways for Introduction of Exotic Bark Beetles and Woodborers William M. Ciesla Forest Health Management International, Fort Collins, Colorado 80525, USA. E-mail: [email protected] April 2004 1. Introduction 2. Insects subject to transport via wood and wood products 2.1 European pine shoot beetles 2.2 Asian longhorn beetles 2.3 Red turpentine beetles 2.4 Eurasian woodwasps 2.5 Emerald ash borers 2.6 Banded elm bark beetles 3. Pathways of introduction 3.1 Unprocessed logs 3.2 Lumber and solid wood packing material 3.2.1 Bark beetles 3.2.2 Woodborers 3.3 Nursery stock 3.4 Special products 4. Mitigating the risk of new introductions 4.1 International coordination 4.2 Pest risk analyses 4.3 Monitoring for new pest introductions 4.3.1 Inspections 4.3.2 Special surveys 4.3.3 Quarantine measures 4.3.4 Treatment of wood products 4.3.4.1 Heat treatment 4.3.4.2 Other methods 5. Conclusions 6. References 1. Introduction Wood and wood products are important pathways for the transport, introduction and establishment of potentially destructive forest insects. Insects that can be transported via these commodities include species with a demonstrated capacity to cause severe damage within their own geographic ranges and, in the absence of natural controls, have the potential to be extremely destructive when introduced and established in new locations. Ever increasing global trade and development of new trading partners have significantly increased the risk of new insect introductions. In recent years, the rate of new introductions, and resulting economic, ecological and social impacts, has increased at an alarming rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota's Top 124 Terrestrial Invasive Plants and Pests
    Photo by RichardhdWebbWebb 0LQQHVRWD V7RS 7HUUHVWULDO,QYDVLYH 3ODQWVDQG3HVWV 3ULRULWLHVIRU5HVHDUFK Sciencebased solutions to protect Minnesota’s prairies, forests, wetlands, and agricultural resources Contents I. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 II. Prioritization Panel members ....................................................................................................... 4 III. Seventeen criteria, and their relative importance, to assess the threat a terrestrial invasive species poses to Minnesota ...................................................................................................................... 5 IV. Prioritized list of terrestrial invasive insects ................................................................................. 6 V. Prioritized list of terrestrial invasive plant pathogens .................................................................. 7 VI. Prioritized list of plants (weeds) ................................................................................................... 8 VII. Terrestrial invasive insects (alphabetically by common name): criteria ratings to determine threat to Minnesota. .................................................................................................................................... 9 VIII. Terrestrial invasive pathogens (alphabetically by disease among bacteria, fungi, nematodes, oomycetes, parasitic plants, and viruses): criteria ratings
    [Show full text]
  • Dutch Elm Disease and Its Control
    Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service EPP-7602 Dutch Elm Disease and Its Control Eric Rebek Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Fact Sheets Associate Professor/State Extension Specialist are also available on our website at: Horticultural Entomology http://osufacts.okstate.edu Jennifer Olson Assistant Extension Specialist/Plant Disease Diagnostician Plant Disease and Insect Diagnostic Laboratory Fungal Transmission by Beetles Dutch elm disease (DED) is one of the most destructive In the U.S., the fungus can be spread from infected to healthy shade tree diseases in North America and has become one of elms by several species of elm bark beetle: smaller European the most widely known and destructive tree diseases in the world. elm bark beetle, Scolytus multistriatus; banded elm bark beetle, All species of elms native to North America are susceptible to Scolytus schevyrewi; and the native elm bark beetle, Hylurgopi- DED, but it is most damaging to American elm, Ulmus americana. nus rufipes (Figures 4 to 6). Smaller European elm bark beetle American elm was one of the most widely planted shade trees is the original and primary vector of Ophiostoma species, and in the United States due to its unique vase-shaped growth form until recently it has been the only significant vector throughout and its hardiness under a wide range of conditions. most of its range. In the extreme northern edge of its range Dutch elm disease was first described in the Netherlands (i.e., upper Midwest), the native elm bark beetle is an important in 1919. The disease spread rapidly in Europe and by 1934 was vector, although not nearly as efficient as the smaller European found in most European countries.
    [Show full text]
  • ROLE of FUNGAL PATHOGEN Ophiostoma Novo-Ulmi in SEMIOCHEMICAL-MEDIATED HOST SELECTION by the NATIVE ELM BARK BEETLE, Hylurgopinus Ruppes (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE)
    ROLE OF FUNGAL PATHOGEN Ophiostoma novo-ulmi IN SEMIOCHEMICAL-MEDIATED HOST SELECTION BY THE NATIVE ELM BARK BEETLE, Hylurgopinus ruppes (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE) Geoffrey David McLeod B.Sc., Biology, University of Regina, 1997 B.Sc. Forestry, University of British Columbia, 200 1 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Department of Biological Sciences 'Geoffrey David McLeod 2005 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2005 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: Geoffrey McLeod Degree: Master of Science Title of Thesis: Role of fungal pathogen Ophiostoma novo-ulmi in semiochemical-mediated host selection by the native elm bark beetle, Hylurgopinus rufipes (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Examining Committee: Chair: Dr. J. Webster, Professor Emeritus Dr. G. Gries, Professor Department of Biological Sciences, S.F.U. Dr. J. Rahe, Professor Emeritus Department of Biological Sciences, S.F.U. Dr. A. Carroll, Research Scientist Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre Public Examiner n,, n,, zi LOOS Date Approved SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENCE The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project or extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. The author has further granted permission to Simon Fraser University to keep or make a digital copy for use in its circulating collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Scolytus Schevyrewi (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) – Banded Elm Bark Beetle Why in 2003, the First Specimens of Scolytus Schevyrewi Were Trapped in USA in Colorado and Utah
    EPPO, 2008 Mini data sheet on Scolytus schevyrewi Added in 2005 – Deleted in 2008 Reasons for deletion: EPPO Panel on Quarantine Pests for Forestry considered that the pest Scolytus schevyrewi was not more damaging than existing European Scolytus. In 2008, it was therefore removed from the EPPO Alert List. Scolytus schevyrewi (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) – banded elm bark beetle Why In 2003, the first specimens of Scolytus schevyrewi were trapped in USA in Colorado and Utah. However, it is suspected that this insect had been present for several years (in examining insect collections, it was discovered that it had been collected already in 1994 and 1998 from Colorado and New Mexico, respectively). This bark beetle of Asian origin was later found colonizing American and Siberian elms in many other states (U. americana and U. pumila). Because S. schevyrewi can damage Ulmus trees and is suspected to transmit Dutch elm disease, the EPPO Secretariat decided to add it to the EPPO Alert List. Where Asia: China (Beijing, Hebei, Heilongjiang, Henan, Ningxia, Shaanxi, Xinjiang), Korea Republic, Korea DPR, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. North America: USA (Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming). On which plants Ulmus species (including U. carpinifolia, U. laevis, U. minor, U. procera) are the main hosts. In Asia, S. schevyrewi is reported on forest, ornamental and fruit tree species: Ulmus spp., Caragana spp., Elaeagnus angustifolia, Salix spp., Prunus spp. (including P. armeniaca, P. dulcis, P. persica, P. salicina) and Pyrus spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Strategies of Invasive Bark Beetles and Borers Species
    insects Article Biological Strategies of Invasive Bark Beetles and Borers Species Denis A. Demidko 1,2,* , Natalia N. Demidko 3, Pavel V. Mikhaylov 2,* and Svetlana M. Sultson 2 1 Sukachev Institute of Forest, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Science, 50, bil. 28, Akademgorodok, 660036 Krasnoyarsk, Russia 2 Scientific Laboratory of Forest Health, Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology, Krasnoyarskii Rabochii Prospekt. 31, 660037 Krasnoyarsk, Russia; [email protected] 3 Department of Medical and Biological Basics of Physical Education and Health Technologies, School of Physical Education, Sport and Tourism, Siberian Federal University, Svobodny ave. 79, 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (D.A.D.); [email protected] (P.V.M.) Simple Summary: Biological invasions are one of the most critical problems today. Invaders have been damaging tree- and shrub-dominated ecosystems. Among these harmful species, a notable role belongs to bark beetles and borers. Extensive phytosanitary measures are needed to prevent their penetration into new regions. However, the lists of quarantine pests should be reasonably brief for more effective prevention of invasion of potentially harmful insects. Our goal is to reveal the set of biological traits of invasive bark beetles and borers that are currently known. We identified four invasion strategies. Inbred, the first one is characterized by inbreeding, parthenogenesis, polyvoltin- ism, xylomycetophagy, flightless males, polyphagy, to less extent by association with pathogenic fungi. For the second, polyphagous, typical traits are polyphagy, feeding on wood, high fecundity, distance sex pheromones presence, development for one year or more. The third strategy, intermediate, Citation: Demidko, D.A.; Demidko, possesses such features as mono- or olygophagy, feeding on inner-bark, short (one year or less) N.N.; Mikhaylov, P.V.; Sultson, S.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Exotic Bark- and Wood-Boring Coleoptera in the United States: Recent Establishments and Interceptions1
    269 Exotic bark- and wood-boring Coleoptera in the United States: recent establishments and interceptions1 Robert A. Haack Abstract: Summary data are given for the 25 new species of exotic bark- and wood-boring Coleoptera first reported in the continental United States between 1985 and 2005, including 2 Buprestidae (Agrilus planipennis and Agrilus prionurus), 5 Cerambycidae (Anoplophora glabripennis, Callidiellum rufipenne, Phoracantha recurva, Sybra alternans, and Tetrops praeusta), and 18 Scolytidae (Ambrosiodmus lewisi, Euwallacea fornicatus, Hylastes opacus, Hylurgops palliatus, Hylurgus ligniperda, Orthotomicus erosus, Phloeosinus armatus, Pityogenes bidentatus, Scolytus schevyrewi, Tomicus piniperda, Xyleborinus alni, Xyleborus atratus, Xyleborus glabratus, Xyleborus pelliculosus, Xyleborus pfeilii, Xyleborus seriatus, Xyleborus similis, and Xylosandrus mutilatus). In addition, summary interception data are presented for the wood-associated beetles in the families Bostrichidae, Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Curculionidae, Lyctidae, Platypodidae, and Scolytidae, based on the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service “Port Information Network” database for plant pests intercepted at US ports of entry from 1985 to 2000. Wood-associated insects were most often intercepted on crating, followed by dunnage and pallets. The five imported products most often associated with these 8341 interceptions were tiles, machinery, marble, steel, and ironware. A significantly higher proportion of the most frequently intercepted true bark beetles
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of the Invasive Banded Elm Bark Beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in the Western United States Author(S): Jana C
    Biology of the Invasive Banded Elm Bark Beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in the Western United States Author(s): Jana C. Lee, José F. Negrón, Sally J. McElwey, Livy Williams, Jeffrey J. Witcosky, John B. Popp, and Steven J. Seybold Source: Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 104(4):705-717. 2011. Published By: Entomological Society of America DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/AN10150 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1603/AN10150 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. ARTHROPOD BIOLOGY Biology of the Invasive Banded Elm Bark Beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in the Western United States 1,2,3 4 4 5 JANA C. LEE, JOSE´ F. NEGRO´ N, SALLY J. MCELWEY, LIVY WILLIAMS, 6 4 2 JEFFREY J. WITCOSKY, JOHN B. POPP, AND STEVEN J. SEYBOLD Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: Regional Summaries Construed to Represent Any Official USDA Or U.S
    This work was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and should not be Appendix: Regional Summaries construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy. 377 species map. Database last updated 28 July 2016. https:// www.nrs.fs.fed.us/tools/afpe/ Southwest Region Vernon RS, LaGasa EH, Phillip H (2001) Geographic and temporal distribution of Agriotes obscurus and A. lineatus Steven J. Seybold, Andrew D. Graves, Susan J. Frankel, (Coleoptera: Elateridae) in British Columbia and Allen White, Carol A. Sutherland, and A. Steve Munson Washington as determined by pheromone trap surveys. J Entomol Soc Br Columbia 98:257–265 Introduction Vitousek PM, Antonio CM, Loope LL, Westbrooks R (1996) The Southwest region (Arizona, California, Colorado, Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah) (Figs. A4.1 and A4.2) is Sci 84:468–478 marked by Mediterranean, montane, and desert climates/ Washington Invasive Species Council (2012) Stop the inva- ecosystems that provide unique and amenable conditions sion: Bark boring moths. Fact Sheet, Washington State and habitats for invading plants, pathogens, insects, and Recreation and Conservation Offce, Washington Invasive vertebrates. Aridity is perhaps the dominant climatic feature Species Council. 2 p. https://www.yumpu.com/en/docu- framing the forest ecosystems of the Southwest (Peterson ment/read/12118488/bark-borking-moths-fact-sheet- 2012). Extreme elevational gradients and the intervening washington-invasive-species-council desert landscapes in this region (Fig. A4.2) create pronounced Webber JF, Mullett M, Brasier CM (2010) Dieback and biogeographical boundaries and refugia for endemic species mortality of plantation Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi) of plants and animals.
    [Show full text]