DOCSLIB.ORG

Present 1995-1996 Mark Bils, University of Rochester Bo Honore, Princeton U

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Present 1995-1996 Mark Bils, University of Rochester Bo Honore, Princeton U DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS SHORT-TERM VISITORS 1995 – Present 1995-1996 Mark Bils, University of Rochester Bo Honore, Princeton University 1996-1997 George Loewenstein, Carnegie Mellon University Dan Peled, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology Motty Perry, Hebrew University of Jerusalem Arnold Zellner, University of Chicago 1997-1998 Costas Meghir, University College of London Dan Peled, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology Motty Perry, Hebrew University of Jerusalem Andrew Postlewaite, University of Pennsylvania 1998-1999 James J. Heckman, University of Chicago 1999-2000 Robert Trivers, Rutgers University Wilbert van der Klaauw, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill 2000-2001 Richard Blundell, University College London Kyle Bagwell, Columbia University Dennis Epple, Carnegie-Mellon University -- CANCELLED Narayana Kocherlakota, University of Minnesota (Bank of Montreal) Dale Mortensen, Northwestern University 2001-2002 Peter Howitt, Brown University (Bank of Montreal) Bo Honore, Princeton University Tim Kehoe, University of Minnesota Antonio Merlo, University of Pennsylvania Peter Norman, University of Wisconsin Angela Redish, University of British Columbia (Bank of Montreal) 2002-2003 John Abowd, Cornell University George Neumann, Iowa University 2003-2004 Tyler Cowan, George Mason University Ayse Imrohoroglu, University of Southern California 2004-2005 Derek Neal, University of Chicago Christopher Flinn, New York University 2005-2006 Christopher Flinn, New York University Enrique Mendoza, University of Maryland Derek Allen Neal, University of Chicago Marco Ottaviana, London Business School 2006-2007 Johannes Horner, Northwestern University John R. Lott, Jr., American Enterprise Institute Mark L. Wright, University of California, Los Angeles 2007-2008 P. Dean Corbae, University of Texas at Austin Robert A. Moffitt, John Hopkins University Preston McAfee, Yahoo! Research David Green, University of British Columbia 2008-2009 Narayana Kocherlakota, University of Minnesota Hyun Song Shin, Princeton University Jeffrey Smith, University of Michigan Hans-Werner Sinn, Ifo Institute for Economic Research, Germany 2009-2010 Matthew Jackson, Stanford University John Kennan, University of Wisconsin Guido Menzio, University of Pennsylvania Moses Shayo, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Gianluca Violante, New York University 2010- 2011 Giusseppi Moscarini, Yale University Jean-Marc Robin, Sciences Po, France Leeat Yariv, California Institute of Technology 2011-2012 Samuel Kortum, University of Chicago John K. H. Quah, Oxford University Matthew Shou-Chung Shum, California Institute of Technology 2012-2013 Jakob H. Abbring, Tilburg University Mark Huggett, Georgetown University Robert A. Miller, Carnegie Mellon University Lones Smith, University of Wisconsin 2013-2014 Jonathan Eaton, Brown University Hanming Fang, University of Pennsylvania Philip Reny, University of Chicago John Rust, Georgetown University 2014-2015 Joseph Altonji, Yale University Paul Milgrom, Stanford University Paul Beaudry, University of British Columbia 2015-2016 Alessandro Pavan, Northwestern University Fatih Guvenen, University of Minnesota -- CANCELLED 2016-2017 Richard Blundell, University College London -- CANCELLED Joe Hotz, Duke University Guido Menzio, University of Pennsylvania Vasiliki Skreta, University College London 2017-2018 Mark Roberts, Penn State University Richard Blundell, University College London Robert A. Moffitt, John Hopkins University Yuliy Sannikov, Stanford Graduate School 2018-2019 Gueorgui Kambourov, University of Toronto Petra Todd, University of Pennsylvania Arthur Lewbel, Boston College Tilman Borgers, University of Michigan Francisco Buera, Washington State University – St. Louis .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Monte Carlo Simulations of the Nested Fixed-Point Algorithm
    MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS OF THE NESTED FIXED-POINT ALGORITHM Erik P. Johnson Working Paper # WP2011-011 October 2010 http://www.econ.gatech.edu/research/wokingpapers School of Economics Georgia Institute of Technology 221 Bobby Dodd Way Atlanta, GA 30332–0615 c by Erik P. Johnson. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including c notice, is given to the source. Monte Carlo Simulations of the Nested Fixed-Point Algorithm Erik P. Johnson Working Paper # WP2011-11 October 2010 JEL No. C18, C63 ABSTRACT There have been substantial advances in dynamic structural models and in the economet- ric literature about techniques to estimate those models over the past two decades. One area in which these new developments has lagged is in studying robustness to distribu- tional assumptions and finite sample properties in small samples. This paper extends our understanding of the behavior of these estimation techniques by replicating John Rust’s (1987) influential paper using the nested fixed-point algorithm (NFXP) and then using Monte Carlo techniques to examine the finite sample properties of the estimator. I then examine the consequences of the distributional assumptions needed to estimate the model on the parameter estimates. I find that even in sample sizes of up to 8,000 observations, the NFXP can display finite sample bias and variances substantially larger than the theoret- ical asymptotic variance. This is also true with departures from distributional assumptions, with the mean square error increasing by a factor of 10 for some distributions of unobserved variables.
    [Show full text]
  • DP Econometrics 2
    This document was generated at 9:20 AM on Friday, November 08, 2013 13 – Econometric Applications of Dynamic Programming AGEC 637 - 2013 I. Positive analysis using a DP foundation: Econometric applications of DP One of the most active areas of research involving numerical dynamic optimization, is the use of DP models in positive analysis. This work seeks to understand the nature of a particular problem being solved by a decision maker. 1 By specifying explicitly the optimization problem being solved, the analyst is able to estimate the parameters of a structural model, as opposed to the easier and more come reduced form approach. This approach was first develop by John Rust (1987) and I draw here directly on his original paper to explain how this is done. He provides a more complete description of his approach in Rust (1994a and 1994b). My focus here will be quite narrow and serves only as an introduction to this literature. A more generally and up-to-date review of approaches for the estimation of the parameters of dynamic optimization problems is provided by Keane et al. (2011). Recall that Rust’s paper was “Optimal Replacement of GMC Bus Engines: An Empirical Model of Harold Zurcher.” The state variable xt denotes the accumulated mileage (since last replacement) of the GMC bus engines of the bus fleet in the Madison, Wisconsin. Harold Zurcher must make the choice as to whether to carry out routine maintenance, θ θ i=0, or replace the engine, i=1. Each period the operating costs, c(xt, 1) where is a vector of parameters to be estimated.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dynamic Programming Model of Retirement Behavior
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: The Economics of Aging Volume Author/Editor: David A. Wise, editor Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-90295-1 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/wise89-1 Conference Date: March 19-22, 1987 Publication Date: 1989 Chapter Title: A Dynamic Programming Model of Retirement Behavior Chapter Author: John P. Rust Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c11588 Chapter pages in book: (p. 359 - 404) 12 A Dynamic Programming Model of Retirement Behavior John Rust 12.1 Introduction This paper derives a model of the retirement behavior of older male workers from the solution to a stochastic dynamic programming prob- lem. The worker's objective is to maximize expected discounted utility over his remaining lifetime. At each time period t the worker chooses control variables (ct,dt) where ct denotes the level of consumption expenditures and dt denotes the decision whether to work full-time, part-time, or to exit the labor force. The model accounts for the se- quential nature of the retirement decision problem and the role of expectations of the uncertain future values of state variables (xt) such as the worker's future lifespan, health status, marital or family status, employment status, and earnings from employment, assets, Social Se- curity retirement, disability, and Medicare payments. Given specific assumptions about workers' preferences and expectations, the model generates a predicted stochastic process for the variables {ct,dt,xt}. This paper, however, focuses on the inverse or "revealed preference" prob- lem: given data on {ct,dt,xt}, how can one go backward and "uncover" the worker's underlying preferences and expectations? One can formalize the revealed preference problem as a problem of statistical inference.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 H. Roald and Janet Lund Excellence in Teaching Award, 2011
    November 2015 Dr. William W. Wilson Vita and Publications 701 231-7472 (ph) 701 231-7400 (fax) [email protected] Education Ph.D. - University of Manitoba, 1980 Major: Agricultural Economics Ancillary: Economics Area of Specialization: Marketing Other Field of Study: Transportation Major Adviser: Dr. E. W. Tyrchniewicz Thesis Topic: Financing the Operation and Rehabilitation of Rail Branch Lines B.A. - North Dakota State University, 1975 Major: Economics Sabbatical, Stanford University, 1987-88 Visiting Scholar, Food Research Institute Work Experience University Distinguished Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, North Dakota State University Responsibilities: Teaching and Research in Agricultural Commodity and Risk Strategy Visiting Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University. 2003, 2004. Responsibilities: Teaching a course in their eMBA program titled Risk Analysis and Management Awards Honors/Recognition: Eugene R. Dahl Excellence in Research Award, 2015 Peltier Award for distinguished record as researcher and educator. NDSU Celebration of Faculty Excellence, 2015. 5th Annual Kraft lecturer (honorary presentation), University of Manitoba. October 30, 2013. H. Roald and Janet Lund Excellence in Teaching Award, 2011. University Distinguished Professor, October 2007. Outstanding Journal Article Award by the Western Agricultural Economics Association, for “Competition and Policy Conflicts in Canada-U.S. Barley Trade,” in the Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, joint with D. Demcey Johnson, July 30, 1996. 1 Recognized as 1) one of the top 1% of agricultural economists by RePEc (Research Papers in Economics) ; and 2) one of the “Top Ten” agricultural economists in an unscientific survey by AgWeek, as important resources for policy makers August 14, 1995. Henry Schapper Fellowship by the University of Western Australia, Perth (May 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Economies in Indian Country: a National Summit May 1, 2012 Narayana Kocherlakota, President, Federal Reserve Bank Of
    Growing Economies in Indian Country: A National Summit May 1, 2012 Narayana Kocherlakota, President, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Introduced by Joseph Firschein, Deputy Associate Director, Division of Consumer and Community Affairs, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Joseph Firschein: My job is, is to do some welcome-- to welcome you to the Board of Governors to provide some context for how we got to this place and to help you understand sort of how we plan to use the day. David already told you a little bit about what the Community Development function does, so I'm not going, I'm not going to go into that. But, I will say that sometimes when we try to explain it to people there's nothing better than an event like this to really kind of make the picture kind of come, come whole. And so, we sometimes talk about three components of what we do. And, and really it just couldn't fit better into sort of the structure of today. We talk about convening stakeholders, conducting applied research and data analysis and identifying approaches that work. And as you'll hear throughout the day that's really what we're going to be doing. In terms of-- oh, the other thing I do want to say is even though we have a full room and quite a distinguished one, I want to welcome everybody who's watching on the web streaming. We've been doing this now for a little bit and we know it's not possible for everybody who would want to be at an event like this to physically come to Washington; particularly an event like this, where it's sometimes far as far as where the folks are that are doing this kind of work.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Methods for Labor Economics Fall 2008 Course
    Department of Economics, UC Berkeley Economics 250c: Structural Methods for Labor Economics Fall 2008 Course Outline and Reading List The goal of the course is to provide a selective overview of more “structural” methods in labor economics and empirical micro, including single period models and dynamic choice problems. Students are assumed to be familiar with basic econometrics and consumer demand theory, and with “reduced form” methods such as regression, instrumental variables, etc. Three recommended text books are: J. Angist and S. Pischke, Mostly Harmless Econometrics. Princeton Press, forthcoming 2008. I have managed to get an advanced copy of this text -- paper copies will be available to class members. This is highly recommended for people who want to catch up on classic reduced form methods. K. Train, Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge U. Press, 2003. J. Adda and R. Cooper, Dynamic Programming: Theory and Applications. MIT Press, 2003. These three are all relatively easy reading. I also recommend the “What’s New in Econometrics?” (WNiE) lectures by G. Imbens and J. Wooldridge (especially lectures 6, 11, 9, and 7, in that order) which are available at the NBER website. Preliminary Outline (Incomplete and subject to additions/changes). 1. Introductory Lecture: Structural vs. Alternative Approaches Background reading: Daniel McFadden. “Economics Choices.” AER, June 2001. Edward E. Leamer. “Let's Take the Con Out of Econometrics.” AER March 1983. 2. Simple Static Choice Models Michael Ransom. “An Empirical Model of Discrete and Continuous Choice in Family Labor Supply.” Review of Economics and Statistics 69 (3) (1987): 465-472. (See also: Michael Ransom.
    [Show full text]
  • Temptation and Self-Control
    FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO WORKING PAPER SERIES Temptation and Self-Control: Some Evidence and Applications Kevin X.D. Huang, Vanderbilt University Zheng Liu, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco John Q. Zhu, Fudan University School of Management August 2013 Working Paper 2013-23 http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/papers/2013/wp2013-23.pdf The views in this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. TEMPTATION AND SELF-CONTROL: SOME EVIDENCE AND APPLICATIONS KEVIN X.D. HUANG, ZHENG LIU, AND JOHN Q. ZHU Abstract. This paper studies the empirical relevance of temptation and self-control using household-level data from the Consumer Expenditure Survey. We construct an infinite- horizon consumption-savings model that allows, but does not require, temptation and self- control in preferences. In the presence of temptation, a wealth-consumption ratio, in ad- dition to consumption growth, becomes a determinant of the asset-pricing kernel, and the importance of this additional pricing factor depends on the strength of temptation. To identify the presence of temptation, we exploit an implication of the theory that a more tempted individual should be more likely to hold commitment assets such as IRA or 401(k) accounts. Our estimation provides empirical support for temptation preferences. Based on our estimates, we explore some quantitative implications of this class of preferences for capital accumulation in a neoclassical growth model and the welfare cost of the business cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • SED 2002 Annual Meeting…………………..Page 3
    SOCIETY FOR ECONOMIC DYNAMICS ANNUAL MEETING NYU STERN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS JUNE 28 – JUNE 30, 2002 Program Chairs: Narayana Kocherlakota, University of Minnesota Fabrizio Perri, New York Univeristy Stern School of Business Conference Coordinators: Felicia Shutter, New York University Stern School of Business Corporate Planners Unlimited, Inc. http://www.corporateplanners.com/ Contact Information: New York University Leonard N. Stern School of Business Economics Department 44 West 4th Street, Room 7-180 New York, NY 10012 Telephone: (212) 998-0860 Fax: (212) 995-4218 http://www.stern.nyu.edu/eco/ http://www.economicdynamics.org/society.htm Conference Sponsors: The C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics 1 Table of Contents I. Welcome to the SED 2002 Annual Meeting…………………..page 3 II. Useful Information……………………………………………..page 4 Conference Staff Tote Bag Contents Name Badge Meals Computer / Internet Access Message Board Supplies for Presenters III. Accommodations………………………………………………..page 5 Sheraton New York Hotel NYU Dormitory, Goddard Hall IV. Directions and Tourist Information…………………………...page 5 To the Sheraton from NYU Stern To Tavern on the Green from NYU Stern To Tavern on the Green from the Sheraton Tourist Information V. Disclaimer……………………………………………………….page 6 VI. Maps……………………………………………………………..page 7 Map of streets surrounding NYU Stern Henry Kaufman Management Center, First Floor Henry Kaufman Management Center, Second Floor Tisch Hall, First Floor Tisch Hall, Upper Concourse (UC) Tisch Hall, Lower Concourse (LC) VII. Program Overview……………………………………………...page 13 VIII. Social Program………………………………………………….page 14 The Contractions at the Sheraton Hotel Reception at Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum World Cup Title Game Conference Dinner at Tavern on the Green IX. Program Guidelines…………………………………………….page 15 X.
    [Show full text]
  • Narayana Kocherlakota: Reflections on Diversity
    Narayana Kocherlakota: Reflections on diversity Speech by Mr Narayana Kocherlakota, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, at the Council on Asian Pacific Minnesotans 2014 Asian Heritage Dinner, St. Paul, Minnesota, 9 May 2014. * * * Thanks to Dorothy Bridges, Duane Carter and David Fettig for their assistance with these remarks. I would like to thank state Senator Alice Johnson and Executive Director Sia Her for the invitation to attend the 2014 Asian Heritage Dinner. I am honored to participate in this prestigious event. My talk tonight will consist of some reflections on diversity. I’ll first talk about the regional diversity that lies at the heart of the Federal Reserve System. I’ll talk next about my journey to my current position and the role that international diversity played in that journey. Finally, I’ll close with some thoughts on the role of workplace diversity. My remarks represent my own views, which are not necessarily those of anyone else in the Federal Reserve System. The Federal Reserve System: a regionally diverse central bank I’ll begin by telling you a few things about my organization, the Federal Reserve System. I will be highlighting the role of regional diversity in the Federal Reserve’s formulation of economic policy. Relative to other central banks around the world, the Federal Reserve System is highly decentralized. The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis is one of 12 regional Reserve Banks that, along with the Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., make up the Federal Reserve System. Our bank represents the ninth of the 12 Federal Reserve districts and includes Montana, the Dakotas, Minnesota, northwestern Wisconsin and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributors
    Contributors Chunrong Ai Angus Deaton Department of Economics Woodrow Wilson School Massachusetts Institute of Technology Princeton University 50 Memorial Drive Princeton, NJ 08544 Cambridge, MA 02139 David T. Ellwood Alan J. Auerbach Kennedy School of Government Department of Economics Harvard University Room 160, McNeil Building 79 Kennedy Street 37 18 Locust Walk Cambridge, MA 02138 University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104 Jonathan Feinstein Graduate School of Business B. Douglas Bernheim Stanford University Kellogg Graduate School of Management Stanford, CA 94305 Northwestern University Leverone Hall Alan M. Garber 2001 Sheridan Road National Bureau of Economic Research Evanston, IL 60208 204 Juniper0 Serra Boulevard Stanford, CA 94305 Axel H. Borsch-Supan Department of Economics Universitat Mannheim Michael D. Hurd Postfach 10 34 62 Department of Economics Gebaude A5, 6 SUNY Stony Brook 6800 Mannheim 1 Stony Brook, NY 11794 Federal Republic of Germany Thomas J. Kane Gary Burtless Kennedy School of Government Brookings Institution Harvard University 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 79 Kennedy Street Washington, DC 20036 Cambridge, MA 02138 384 Contributors Laurence J. Kotlikoff Sherwin Rosen National Bureau of Economic Research Department of Economics 1050 Massachusetts Avenue University of Chicago Cambridge, MA 02138 1126 East 59th Street Chicago, IL 60637 Edward P. Lazear Graduate School of Business John Rust University of Chicago Department of Economics 1101 East 58th Street University of Wisconsin Chicago, IL 60637 1180 Observatory Drive Madison, Wisconsin 53706 Herman B. Leonard Kennedy School of Government James H. Schultz Harvard University Director 79 Kennedy Street Policy Center on Aging Cambridge, MA 02138 Heller Graduate School Brandeis University Thomas MaCurdy Waltham, MA 02254 Department of Economics Stanford University James H.
    [Show full text]
  • “Structural Vs. Atheoretic Approaches to Econometrics” by Michael Keane John Rust, University of Maryland
    Comments on: “Structural vs. Atheoretic Approaches to Econometrics” by Michael Keane John Rust, University of Maryland There is little here I can disagree with. This should be no surprise since I am a structural econometrician, and thus a biased commentator. I have great admiration for Keane's work, and also for the work of other fine scholars in this area — many of who are at this conference. I have only a minor quibble. Structural econometrics is not on the decline everywhere in economics. For example, the field of industrial organization still values empirical work that focuses on formulating, estimating, and testing models of firm and industry behavior. As a result, structural empirical IO papers are still frequently published in several leading economics journals such as RAND and Econometrica. It is mainly in public and labor economics where structural work has been on the decline, and my perception is that this is been partly due to antipathy to this work by the editors of the top journals such as the Journal of Political Economy, American Economic Review and the Quarterly Journal of Economics. Some structural econometric papers can still be published in these journals, but the odds are much better if the work is disguised as “behavioral economics” — a field that is now synonymous with theories involving some degree of “irrationality” or departure from dynamic expected utility maximization. 1 There are still a few leading economics departments where structural econometrics is taught and practiced, including Penn, Duke, and Yale. However structural econometrics has been virtually purged from most of the top ranked economics departments (MIT, Princeton, Harvard, Berkeley, and Chicago).
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Seminar and Luncheon CFA Winnipeg Is Pleased to Present Dr
    Notice of Seminar and Luncheon CFA Winnipeg is pleased to present Dr. Narayana Kocherlakota, President and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 Location: The Fairmont Hotel Price: Members $35.00 and Non-Members $45.00 Time: Arrive at 11:30. Lunch will be served at 11:45 and the speech will start at 12:15. To Book Your Seat: Contact Eva Swan at (204) 471-3640 or at [email protected] Topic: Dr. Kocherlakota will be presenting a speech entitled “Looking Back at Three Years of Federal Reserve Actions”. Dr. Kocherlakota is welcoming questions from the audience. About the speaker: Narayana Kocherlakota became president and chief executive officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis on October 8, 2009. Kocherlakota has served as a professor of economics at the University of Minnesota since 2005, where he chaired the department from 2006-2008. Since 1999 he has also served as a consultant to the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. From 1996-98, he was a research staff member at the Bank. He is also a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research. Kocherlakota has published more than 30 articles in academic journals, including Econometrica, Journal of Political Economy, Journal of Economic Theory, Journal of Monetary Economics and Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. His work includes theoretical and empirical contributions to macroeconomics, monetary economics, financial economics and public finance. Kocherlakota has authored a book from Princeton University Press titled The New Dynamic Public Finance, which describes an approach to tax design pioneered by him and others over the past decade.
    [Show full text]