Climate Change Had Been One Area Ngos, Such As Christian Aid, Have Called on the Parties to Make Explicit Pledges

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Climate Change Had Been One Area Ngos, Such As Christian Aid, Have Called on the Parties to Make Explicit Pledges Dods Monitoring International Development - manifesto commitments 2015 February 2015 Introduction By Chris Fairbank Senior Political Consultant In previous years the major three parties have made general and vague commitments to support international de- velopment and humanitarian projects. The success of Michael Moore and Bill Cash’s Private Members Bills, as well as the Department for International Development’s (DFID) budget of 0.7 per cent have forced parties to look beyond their typical commitments and go further than their previously ‘obvious’ ideas. Climate change had been one area NGOs, such as Christian Aid, have called on the parties to make explicit pledges. Manifestos are normally just a nod to a deeper, yet unpublished party policy, and 2015 will be no exception, espe- cially as the Conservatives face off against UKIP in many seats. UKIP will use the fact the coalition have provided aid to India, China and Russia in the past few years and a recent NAO report as a tool to attack the modern Conserva- tives. Labour have looked to the public for inspiration on their policy, ‘Britain’s Global Role’ policy commission for ideas and the thrust of policy stance which pledges to focus on tax, climate change and eliminating global poverty by 2030. The Liberal Democrats share the same target and have relied on their membership to steer them towards poli- cies on malaria, gender equality, female genital mutilation (FGM), disability, tax and women's rights. The Conservatives are more of a mystery when it comes to policy formation and development, although would struggle to justify reversing coalition policy which has been pushed by Justine Greening, Andrew Mitchell and David Cameron. Nick Clegg has described the party’s position as “curious” in the past and noted how it was an interesting indicator of divisions throughout all levels of the party. UKIP are unlikely to escape their “bongo bongo land” percep- tions, despite promising to protect £2bn in the aid budget. The various parties international spokespersons; Justine Greening and Philip Hammond (Con), Douglas Alexander and Mary Creagh (Lab), Martin Horwood (Lib Dem), Tony Clarke and Laura Bannister (Green), Humza Yousaf (SNP) and Mike Hookem (UKIP), are unlikely to have to spend much time on the campaign trail defending their policy on development, but the significance of 0.7 per cent of GNI, some £12.5bn in 2015, will not be lost of voters. Labour Labour commit to ending poverty by 2030 Much of Labour’s policy has been outlined in its ‘Britain’s Global Role’ policy paper. Labour leader Ed Miliband out- lined his main priority for the international agenda and for his government, namely to raise global ambitions for combating extreme poverty and inequality, with the goal of ending extreme poverty by 2030. Shadow international development secretary Mary Creagh has committed the Party to reversing the coalition’s deci- sion to cease funding to the International Labour Organisation. Such a decision would help combat abusive supply chains and free 168 million child workers she said at a recent speech to the IDS. Climate change Former Energy and Climate Change Secretary of State, Miliband announced that climate change would be a key component of a Labour agenda. Labour policy is to review and raise global targets for reducing carbon emissions every five years with the long term goal of achieving zero net global emissions by the latter half of the century. Mary Creagh outlined the party’s commitment to capping international temperature rises, part of the strategy to stopping millions falling back into poverty. Climate change would be a major aspect of Labour’s foreign policy she said. The commitment was welcomed by Greenpeace, who embraced the global call for a zero carbon world by 2050. Christian Aid welcomed the announcement, pointing out that there was no greater threat to the world’s poor than severe climate disruption and said the Paris summit would be the greatest opportunity to do something about this. Miliband, in his speech, noted the importance of the Paris summit on climate change, due to be held from 30 No- vember to 11 December 2015. Creagh has previously said that Labour would call for a specific sustainable develop- ment goal (SDG) on climate change. Universal health coverage In a speech to the Institute of Development Studies shadow development secretary Mary Creagh outlined the par- ty’s approach to health in the developing world and their priorities for the coming year. She explained that Labour would establish a Centre for Universal health Coverage, providing global partnerships, support and encouragement to countries that want to supply healthcare. A Labour manifesto will contain a commitment to developing a ‘meso-level’ between poor people in developing countries and giant global health organisations—empowering local people, support by big health, to take charge of their own health and development. Such a move would help the world move ‘beyond aid’. Creagh has also committed to pushing for SDGs on the above issues, as well as tax, disability and human rights. Conservative Scrutiny and economic prosperity The Conservativemanifesto in 2010 advocated greater transparency and scrutiny of aid spending, payment by re- sults and creating a ‘MyAid’ Fund to allow the British people to have a greater say on aid spending. 2015 is likely to feature similar themes; increasing scrutiny on spending, disaster resilience work in developing countries and a re- newed drive on aid through economic cooperation. The 2010 manifesto stated that “trade and economic growth are the only sustainable way for developing countries to escape poverty” and a Conservative manifesto in 2015 will em- phasise the importance of sustainable economic development as an integral part of the next round of Millennium Development Goals, to be decided in September in New York. ‘Aid into trade’ was a central theme of Secretary of State Justine Greening’s2014 conference speech. In a recent speech Justine Greening highlighted ‘economic growth’ as one of the crucial missing elements of the Mil- lennium Development Goals and as an essential component of the 2015 negotiations. Defence through aid? In her speech to conference in 2014 Justine Greening was keen to emphasise the cross-departmental coordination of development policy, and just how much she cooperated with the Foreign Office and Ministry of Defence. A Con- servative manifesto may well herald an innovative approach to humanitarian spending and disaster relief, with DFID funding covering some defence costs, such as aircraft carrier deployment or helicopter maintenance. A similar policy was floated in early 2013, but Liberal Democrats in the Treasury and DFID vetoed the move. At the time Cameron announced he was in favour of seeing more of the aid budget diverted to the shared ‘conflict pool’ used by both the MoD and DFID. Any spending would have to meet OECD rules on what constitutes ‘aid spending’. "If you are asking can they work even more closely together to make sure that the funds we have at our disposal are used to provide basic levels of security in deeply broken and fragile states, then yes, we should. That is an important part of development” he said. Such a move will likely placate many backbench MPs and will be targeted at Conserva- tive/UKIP swing voters. Sustainable development Making a speech to the UN climate change summit in September 2014 David Cameron described climate change as “one of the most serious threats facing our world”. Greening has promised that climate change would be interwo- ven “or mainstreamed” throughout the entire post-2015 framework and is likely to ensure that measures on renew- able energy cooperation and skills development with developing countries are included in the manifesto. Both Greening and her predecessor Andrew Mitchell have shown commitment to furthering the role of education, women rights, protection for children and disabilities into the Government’s development psyche, the later of which , Greening has authored the first ever DFID strategy on involving disability in development. Liberal Democrats TB, HIV and Malaria The transparency and member-led approach the Liberal Democrats favour ensures that the party’s policy and ap- proach to international and humanitarian issues is no secret—the pre-manifesto document published in late 2014 outlines the party’s goals for humanitarian policy in the coming years. This manifesto document outlined the party’s renewed commitment to eliminating TB, HIV and malaria within a generation. The party has argued that investing in health programmes in developing countries is essential as these diseases disproportionally affect the poor, as witnessed during the recent ebola outbreak which has killed nearly 10,000 people. The pledge featured in the ‘Reducing Poverty and Discrimination’ policy motion, passed at the 2014 conference in Glasgow. Gender and equality strategy Former development minister Lynne Featherstone spent her ministerial tenure working with governments around the world to change attitudes towards gender equality and specifically the practice of FGM. As a result, the coalition pledged funds to tackle the issue both in the UK and abroad, committing new funds to support the anti-FGM African movement. As a result, 25 African countries have now outlawed that practice. The manifesto is likely to echo the commitment to ending FGM within a generation and also renew efforts to increase the number of prosecutions do- mestically. The party will also look to include ideas and proposals for a DFID led LGBT and Gender Equality Strategy, enshrining women's’ rights to education and freedom of marriage. The Liberal Democrats were overwhelmingly supportive of Bill Cash’s PMB to enshrine into law the need to consider the impact of every DFID programme on women. Sustainable goals; Climate change, tax, disability and fairtrade DFID ministers past and present Lynne Featherstone and Baroness Lindsay Northover have been consistent in calling for and outlining Government priorities when it comes to the next round of Millennium Development Goals and ar- guing for strong measures on climate change, tax, disability and fair trade.
Recommended publications
  • Organised With: Fabian Summer Conference 2016 Britain's Future, Labour's Future Saturday 21 May 2016, 09.30 – 17.15 TUC Co
    Organised with: Fabian Summer conference 2016 Britain’s Future, Labour’s Future Saturday 21 May 2016, 09.30 – 17.15 TUC Congress Centre, 28 Great Russell Street, London, WC1B 3LS 9.30-10.20 Registration Tea and coffee 10.20-10.45 Welcome Main Hall Andrew Harrop (general secretary, Fabian Society) Massimo D’Alema (president, Foundation for European Progressive Studies) 10.45-11.30 Keynote speech Main Hall Gordon Brown (former prime minister) 11.30-12.20 Morning Plenary ‘Should we stay or should we go now’: What should the left decide? Main Hall Caroline Flint MP (Labour MP, Don Valley) Baroness Jenny Jones (Green Party, Member of the House of Lords) Tim Montgomerie (columnist, The Times) Chair: Andrew Harrop, (general secretary, Fabian Society) 12.30-13.30 Breakout sessions Main Hall It’s the economy, stupid: what’s best for jobs and growth? Shabana Mahmood MP (Labour MP, Birmingham Ladywood) John Mills (deputy chair, Vote Leave) Lucy Anderson MEP (Labour MEP for London) Vicky Pryce (economist) Chair: Michael Izza (chief executive, ICAEW) Council Chamber The jury’s out: can the campaigns persuade the ‘undecideds’? Interactive session Brendan Chilton (general secretary, Labour Leave) Antonia Bance (head of campaigns and communications, TUC) Richard Angell (director, Progress) Chair: Felicity Slater (exec member, Fabian Women’s Network) Meeting Room 1 Drifting apart? The four nations and Europe Nia Griffith MP (shadow secretary of state for wales and Labour MP for Llanelli) John Denham (director, University of Winchester’s Centre for English
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Interests of Members’ Secretaries and Research Assistants
    REGISTER OF INTERESTS OF MEMBERS’ SECRETARIES AND RESEARCH ASSISTANTS (As at 29 September 2015) INTRODUCTION Purpose and Form of the Register In accordance with Resolutions made by the House of Commons on 17 December 1985 and 28 June 1993, holders of photo-identity passes as Members’ secretaries or research assistants are in essence required to register: ‘Any occupation or employment for which you receive over £335 from the same source in the course of a calendar year, if that occupation or employment is in any way advantaged by the privileged access to Parliament afforded by your pass. Any gift (eg jewellery) or benefit (eg hospitality, services) that you receive, if the gift or benefit in any way relates to or arises from your work in Parliament and its value exceeds £335 in the course of a calendar year.’ In Section 1 of the Register entries are listed alphabetically according to the staff member’s surname. Section 2 contains exactly the same information but entries are instead listed according to the sponsoring Member’s name. Administration and Inspection of the Register The Register is compiled and maintained by the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. Anyone whose details are entered on the Register is required to notify that office of any change in their registrable interests within 28 days of such a change arising. An updated edition of the Register is published approximately every 6 weeks when the House is sitting. Changes to the rules governing the Register are determined by the Committee on Standards in the House of Commons, although where such changes are substantial they are put by the Committee to the House for approval before being implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Warns Over Relaxing Sunday Trading Laws Churches Help Tackle
    Labour warns over relaxing Sunday trading laws Shadow Business Secretary, Chuka Umunna, urges government to Keep Sundays Special Labour MP Chuka Umunna, pictured right, has attacked the government after senior Conservatives openly suggested that Sunday trading hours should be permanently extended. A temporary extension to Sunday trading hours in England and Wales was introduced by the Government for the duration of the Olympic and Paralympic games earlier this year. However, No 10 has confirmed that ministers are looking at making the change permanent. Eric Pickles, the Communities Secretary, said that an extension should be “looked at.” the rights of people of faith, and to maintain at least Speaking to Churches Update, Chuka said: “Any some distinctiveness for Sunday.” extension to Sunday trading hours on a permanent basis will break up the consensus that was carefully Chuka’s comments received support from Justin King, put together after proper consultation over a long Chief Executive of Sainsbury’s who warned a period of time of businesses, unions, churches and permanent extension to Sunday trading hours was other organisations.” Recognising the importance of “not a magic answer to economic regeneration.” King Sundays to families and churches across the country, was writing in a letter to the Sunday Telegraph, in he said: “It will also mean the end of Sundays being which the Church of England and the Union of Shop, special and put pressure on families with 24 hour Distributive and Allied Workers and the Association of working across all of the retail sector seven days a Convenience Stores also expressed concern about the week.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Labour Leadership Contest Rules Are Responsible for the Lacklustre Pre-Campaign
    The new Labour leadership contest rules are responsible for the lacklustre pre-campaign democraticaudit.com /2015/06/08/the-new-labour-leadership-contest-rules-are-responsible-for-the-lacklustr- pre-campaign/ By Democratic Audit UK 2015-6-8 The Labour Party is currently in the (long) process of electing its new leader, with the eventual victor likely to fight a 2020 General Election. This is the first election to be fought under the party’s new system, following the recent controversy over trade union involvement with the process. Eunice Goes argues that these new rules are stifling the current contest, which so far can be characterised as monotone and lacklustre. Frontrunner Andy Burnham (Credit: NHS Confederation, CC BY 2.0) The official campaign to elect the new leader of the Labour Party has not started yet (the official contenders will be announced on the June 12) but it has already proved to be a disappointment. Instead of offering an opportunity to discuss in a frank and dispassionate manner the causes of Labour’s devastating defeat and deliberate about possible pathways for the future, the new rules to elect the leader have had the effect of narrowing the scope of that debate. The candidates to the leadership of the Labour Party are not responsible for this state of affairs. In fact, they are the guinea pigs of new rules, outlined by the Collins Report on Party Reform to elect the Labour leader that were approved in 2014 at a special conference. The purpose of the new rules was to reduce the power of the trade unions in the party’s decision-making (by putting an end to block voting), the power of MPs in the election of the party leader and ultimately to open the party to new voices and democratise its structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Gregory Chief Executive Firstgroup Plc 395
    Matthew Gregory House of Commons, Chief Executive London, FirstGroup plc SW1A0AA 395 King Street Aberdeen AB24 5RP 15 October 2019 Dear Mr Gregory As West Yorkshire MPs, we are writing as FirstGroup are intending to sell First Bus and to request that the West Yorkshire division of the company is sold as a separate entity. This sale represents a singular opportunity to transform bus operations in our area and we believe it is in the best interests of both FirstGroup and our constituents for First Bus West Yorkshire to be taken into ownership by the West Yorkshire Combined Authority (WYCA). To this end, we believe that WYCA should have the first option to purchase this division. In West Yorkshire, the bus as a mode of travel is particularly relied upon by many of our constituents to get to work, appointments and to partake in leisure activities. We have a long-shared aim of increasing the usage of buses locally as a more efficient and environmentally friendly alternative to the private car. We believe that interest is best served by allowing for passengers to have a stake in their own service through the local combined authority. There is wide spread public support for this model as a viable direction for the service and your facilitation of this process through the segmentation of the sale can only reflect well on FirstGroup. We, as representatives of the people of West Yorkshire request a meeting about the future of First Bus West Yorkshire and consideration of its sale to West Yorkshire Combined Authority. Yours sincerely, Alex Sobel MP Tracey Brabin MP Imran Hussain MP Judith Cummins MP Naz Shah MP Thelma Walker MP Paula Sherriff MP Holly Lynch MP Jon Trickett MP Barry Sheerman MP John Grogan MP Hilary Benn MP Richard Burgon MP Fabian Hamilton MP Rachel Reeves MP Yvette Cooper MP Mary Creagh MP Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org).
    [Show full text]
  • Wakefield District Cycle Forum
    © Natural England copyright 2014. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2014 Paths for Communities - Project summary sheet: Wakefield District Cycle Forum Location: West Yorkshire Supporting local businesses: 11 Right of Way Created: Bridleway 5.3 km Volunteer hours contributed: 534 Footpath Cost of project: £96,696 Improved existing rights: 100m footpath Grant rate: 86% The Chevet Branch Line Project was a riders around the City of Wakefield, three phase project which successfully The Wakefield Wheel. It is a connecting completed in December 2013. The route between Newmillerdam Country results are a new 5. 2km bridleway Park, the Trans Pennine Trail and other on a disused railway line south east popular Country Parks in the Wakefield of Wakefield and a 100 metres of link area. The project was a result of a close footpath. The surfaced bridleway collaboration between Wakefield completes the missing link in a circular Metropolitan Borough Council off road route for cyclists, walkers and and Wakefield Cycle Forum whose One of the enthusiastic landowners involved with the project has said, “I am very pleased in the end the whole job came good for yourselves and us. I have walked up the old railway line towards Royston with the dogs many times, it is now a pleasant walk. I notice there are plenty of cyclists making good use. It is pleasing to see the old railway better used and well improved with the new hard surface. Also it has been a lot safer for walkers without using the main road.” members volunteered to help clear and signpost the route.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Politics
    Education Politics Journal of the Socialist Educational Association o June 2015, N 124 Free to members £1 non-members Could any of these lead the way to a socialist education system? INSIDE: the leadership candidates speak for themselves Affiliated to the Labour Party www.socialisteducationalassociation.org Editorial This edition contains no articles on what went is intent on policies that will provide easy targets: wrong for Labour on 7th May. The Party is inadequate action on the priority issues, the conducting an investigation. The research into who provision of sufficient school places and teachers; voted for whom, where, and why, will have to be unfairer and inadequate funding for schools and a high quality to circumvent the lack of candour on the disastrous neglect of FE; and a continuing lack of part of many respondents to pre-election pollsters. transparent accountability for academies. The propensity of commentators to profess to know the answers before the investigation is to be But as well as these day-to-day issues, at this stage deprecated. we need national figures to argue from first principles about the purposes of education in a fairer Amongst those taking precipitate action, strongly society. One key principle must be that education is influenced by 24 hour news outlets desperate for a social experience as well as an individual journey, the new, was the Party Leader. It was not always a preparation not only for FHE and work but also for axiomatic that losing an election meant losing that roles in family, community, and polity. School is job, and it is arguable that the Leader should have where children learn what it is to be social.
    [Show full text]
  • General Election 2015 Report to National Executive Committee 24Th March 2015 Harriet Harman QC MP
    Woman to Woman Campaign Tour - General Election 2015 Report to National Executive Committee 24th March 2015 Harriet Harman QC MP @HarrietHarman | #pinkbus1 | #Labour4women Table of Contents Labour’s Woman to Woman Campaign….…….……..…3 65 Constituencies Visited to Date……………………….….5 Meeting Women in Many Different Settings…….….…7 Woman to Woman Campaign Literature…….………….8 Woman to Woman Digital Campaign……………..……..10 Saturation National and Local Media Coverage……..13 Key Campaigners……………………………………………….....14 Women Trade Unionists…………..……………………….....16 The #Pinkbus tour has been made possible by enormous support from the Party and I would like to thank Iain McNicol and his team particularly Emilie Oldknow, Emma Meehan and her team, the Regional offices, the local and national Press teams, Kat Segal and the digital team, Caroline Adams, Anouska Gregorek, Beth Gardiner-Smith and my own team particularly Ayesha Hazarika, Sophie Wingfield, Clare Gosbee, Hannah Lazell and Matt Price. 2 Labour’s Woman to Woman Campaign Labour's Woman to Woman campaign is the biggest ever women's campaign to reach out to women across the country ahead of May's General Election - particularly the 9 million women who did not vote in 2010. With the famous Pink Bus, the Woman to Woman campaign has visited 65 constituencies and will be campaigning up to Election Day in every English Region, in Wales and Scotland. Women from across Labour's team - including Shadow Cabinet members, MPs, councillors, MEPs, peers, AMs, MSPs and members of the GLA as well as from our affiliated trade unions - have joined the Woman to Woman tour. We have been highlighting all of Labour's key policies on the NHS, on the economy, on housing, education and immigration - but also issues of childcare, equal pay, tackling domestic violence, older women and women's representation.
    [Show full text]
  • Fashion Question Time 2021
    Press Release Fashion Question Time 2021 in partnership with the V&A Rights, Relationships and Revolution On Monday, 19th April 2021 Fashion Revolution’s annual Fashion Question Time, the third in partnership with the Victoria & Albert museum, will continue using last year’s digital format. The event will be live- streamed from 1pm - 2:30 pm BST on Fashion Revolution’s YouTube channel and available for later viewing. Chaired by Baroness Lola Young, co-chair and cross-bench peer for the UK's All-Party Parliamentary Group: Ethics and Sustainability in Fashion, the event will follow a BBC Question Time format, facilitating the opportunity for industry professionals and members of the public to pre-submit questions to our panellists. This year’s event follows the overall theme for Fashion Revolution Week 2021:Rights, Relationships and Revolution is a pressing one for all of our futures, because living on a healthy planet should be a fundamental human right, and urgent action is needed from the fashion industry. Human rights and the rights of nature are interconnected and interdependent; we need a revolution in our relationships with each other, within fashion supply chains, and with the natural world, for our own prosperity and wellbeing, and the health of our earth and our oceans. A diverse range of leading experts from across government, academia and the fashion and textile industry will take a selection of questions aligned with this topic and explore interconnected solutions at a cultural, industry and policy level. The panel discussing this year’s theme will include: • Nicole Rycroft, founder and executive director of Canopy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prime Minister, HC 1393
    Liaison Committee Oral evidence: The Prime Minister, HC 1393 Wednesday 18 July 2018 Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 18 July 2018. Watch the meeting Members present: Dr Sarah Wollaston (Chair); Hilary Benn; Chris Bryant; Sir William Cash; Yvette Cooper; Mary Creagh; Lilian Greenwood; Sir Bernard Jenkin; Norman Lamb; Dr Julian Lewis; Angus Brendan MacNeil; Dr Andrew Murrison; Neil Parish; Tom Tugendhat. Questions 1-133 Witnesses I: Rt Hon Theresa May, Prime Minister. Written evidence from witnesses: – [Add names of witnesses and hyperlink to submissions] Examination of witnesses Witnesses: Rt Hon Theresa May, Prime Minister. Chair: Good afternoon, and thank you for coming. For those following from outside the room, we will cover Brexit to start with for the first hour, and then we will move on to the subjects of air quality, defence expenditure, the restoration and renewal programme here and, if we have time, health and social care. We will start the session with Hilary Benn, the Exiting the European Union Committee Chair. Q1 Hilary Benn: Good afternoon, Prime Minister. Given the events of the last two weeks, wouldn’t it strengthen your hand in the negotiations if you put the White Paper to a vote in the House of Commons? The Prime Minister: What is important is that we have set out the Government’s position and got through particularly important legislation in the House of Commons. Getting the European Union (Withdrawal) Act on the statute book was a very important step in the process of withdrawing from the European Union. We have published the White Paper, and we have begun discussing it at the EU level.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of UK Political Leadership on the Environment Since the 2010
    A review of UK political leadership on the environment since the 2010 general election GREEN STANDARD 2013 Green Standard 2013 © Green Alliance 2013 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- A review of UK political leadership on the Noncommercial-No derivative works environment since the 2010 general election 3.0 unported licence. This does not replace copyright but gives certain by: rights without having to ask Green Alliance for permission. Campaign for Better Transport, Friends of the Under this licence, this work may Earth, Greenpeace, Green Alliance, RSPB, The be shared freely. It provides the Wildlife Trusts and WWF. freedom to copy, distribute and transmit this work on to others, provided text is unaltered. This work Acknowledgements must not be resold or used for Thanks to the following individuals for their input: commercial purposes. These Richard Benwell, Ruth Davis, Penny Evans, conditions can be waived under certain circumstances with the written Andrew Farmer, Joss Garman, Owen Gibbons, permission of Green Alliance. For Alastair Harper, Richard Hebditch, Stephen more information about this licence Hinchley, Donna Hume, Liz Hutchins, Harry go to http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Huyton, Elaine King, Hannah Kyrke-Smith, Gareth Morgan, Doug Parr, Andrew Pendleton, Hazel Phillips, Ellie Robinson, George Smeeton, Ben Stafford and Matt Trimmer. Published by Green Alliance September 2013 ISBN 978-1-905869-96-1 Green Alliance 36 Buckingham Palace Road London SW1W 0RE T 020 7233 7433 [email protected] www.green-alliance.org.uk blog: greenallianceblog.org.uk twitter: @GreenAllianceUK The Green Alliance Trust Registered charity no.
    [Show full text]