DOCSLIB.ORG

Ontario Mennonite History:Ontmennohistory34-1 0.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ontario Mennonite History:Ontmennohistory34-1 0.Pdf Old Order daughter communities not sustainable before 1960s Ontario By Barb Draper t the fall meeting of the Mennonite to help those who moved by establishing Mennonite AHistorical Society of Ontario, held congregations, but in the smaller, distant at Floradale Mennonite Church on Oct. communities, services were infrequent 24, 2015, Clare Frey talked about the and some families began attending other History history of the Mennonite community denominations. in the late 1800s and early 1900s, The Great Awakening with its explaining why there was so little growth emotional religion had significant in the Old Order community before the impact on Mennonite churches in THE 1960s. Clare is a minister and historian Ontario, especially in the outlying in the Markham-Waterloo Mennonite areas. Clare pointed to the example of NEWSLETTER Conference and enjoys collecting the community in Wallace Township FOR THE information about other conservative in northern Perth County. In 1869 his groups. In talking about the Old Order great-great-grandfather was ordained MENNONITE communities in Ontario, he includes as a deacon in that remote community, the Old Order Mennonites, the David only to find the community dividing HISTORICAL Martins, the Orthodox Mennonites, who between traditionalists and progressives are all horse-and-buggy groups, as well a few years later. The meetinghouse SOCIETY OF as the Markham-Waterloo Conference. went with the progressive group so the There has been a lot of growth traditionalists built a new building in ONTARIO among Old Order Mennonites since the Kurtzville. The traditionalist community 1960s. This is not unique to Ontario. In did not proper and Clare’s ancestor Pennsylvania, 60 years ago, the horse- moved back to the Waterloo area in 1884. and-buggy Mennonites of Lancaster A church division is something County were all within that county. By like a tug-of-war, said Clare. When the VOLUME XXXIV 2012 they had spread so much that only rope breaks, both ends go flying. In the NUMBER 1 about a third remained in Lancaster church after a split, both groups tend County. • to move in the direction that they had By the 1880s, Mennonites had been pulling for. When the Old Order JUNE, 2016 spread throughout southern Ontario. Mennonite Church was created after the • People were moving in search of land to split in 1889, they moved in an ultra- ISSN 1192-5515 new communities and the church tried conservative direction. South Peel (built in 1901 west of Wallenstein), was the only new Old Order Mennonite congregation between 1889 and the 1950s. The meetinghouse was rebuilt in 1997. ~ Continued on page 2 ~ Page 2 At the beginning of the Old Order in a viable community and not Markham-Waterloo Mennonite Conference church in 1889, they had 15 places of strike out to build new settlements. meetinghouses in 2015 worship. There were four in the north- Many people left the Old Martins (north Waterloo) 1830s Waterloo area, four in the Markham area, Order Mennonites between 1915 two in the Vineland area, two in the Zurich Elmira (Elmira) 1850s and 1940. The David Martin North Woolwich (Floradale) 1850s area, two in Cayuga and one just across people left in 1917 due to their ---- the border in New York State. Except for Montrose (West Montrose) 1950 concern that the Old Orders were Goshen (Drayton) 1955 the four in the Waterloo area, they have not strict enough. In the 1920s and Brotherston (Listowel) 1974 all gone extinct. Some of these places of 30s many left to attend Ontario Fairhaven (Millbank) 1975 worship didn’t even make it to 1900. Beachburg (Ottawa Valley) 1980 Conference churches or the new Mapleview (Alma) 1982 The first half of the twentieth century Bible Chapel in Hawkesville. In Minto Grove (Harriston) 2007 was a time of moving toward the core, 1930, the Old Order groups in North Haven (New Liskeard) 2010 Meadowside (Conn) 2011 toward the centre, rather than moving out Markham and Rainham/Cayuga into new communities. This happened in stopped affiliating with the Old Pennsylvania and other communities as Order group in Waterloo and then well as in Ontario. A mentality developed in 1939 the Old Order church in the the idea of having each congregation that it was dangerous to move too far Waterloo area divided with the formation meet only every other week so that the away. Faithfulness meant staying close to of the Markham-Waterloo Mennonite ministers and lay people can be visitors home. Conference. at other meetinghouses. Since the 1990s, In the 1880s a group of traditionalists By the 1960s the first Old Order many congregations have been divided from Ontario moved to May City, Iowa. families took a new step and moved to so that two smaller congregations use the They had become impatient with the the Mount Forest area. Many people were same meetinghouse on alternate weeks. traditionalist-progressive struggle in skeptical, but today that community has Each year, a booklet is printed that shows the Mennonite church and were zealous five meetinghouses. As the Old Order where services will be held on a given about being plain. They moved to a church has grown, it has had to change. Sunday. completely new community, hoping to As a district grows too large for one Clare commented that these new build a pure church. But in the end the bishop to handle, then it needs to be communities are not planned by the settlement only lasted a short time and divided into more than one bishop district. ministers or church leaders. Rather when it was extinct by the early 1900s. Those As the group has become larger a viable community is established with who had been influenced by this Iowa they have worked to maintain a balance several families, then the church leaders migration were very negative about between the congregation and the larger organize a congregation with a minister the idea of new settlements and that community. They have maintained and deacon. reinforced the idea that you should stay Maintaining Community in new locations By Amsey Martin he map of the communities of the Old Order Mennonite The Old Order Mennonite Church was first established in TChurch in Ontario (see map of Old Order communities, 1889 when Bishop Abraham Martin led a group away from the page 3) shows that communities beyond the original one in mainstream Mennonite Church. In 1901, the South Peel church Waterloo have all begun since 1967. The communities of was built on what was then the western edge of the Old Order Teeswater and Dunnville did not survive long-term. Mennonite community. Today, the Old Order community has The newest community is in Matheson in northern Ontario, expanded so far west geographically that South Peel is slightly a new venture begun in 2013. Starting a community that far on the eastern half of the Waterloo-Wellington-Perth settlement. away from the rest of us is a new challenge, a test. The bears No new church buildings were erected from the time of and moose are interesting, but the climate is a challenge. The South Peel in 1901 until Olivet in 1955. By 1962 Linwood was move from Waterloo to Matheson, in distance, is comparable to built and Winterbourne in 1965. In 1972 the first meetinghouse the move 200 years ago, from Pennsylvania to Upper Canada. in the Mount Forest area was built at Spring Creek. The first The chart listing when church buildings were first built meetinghouse beyond the Waterloo or Mount Forest areas was in the various settlements shows how much building has Northbend, built in 1998 in the Chesley area. been going on in recent years. Actually, Elmadale, the last Why was there no need for more meetinghouses between meetinghouse listed for the Waterloo settlement has not yet been 1901 and 1955? Let’s explore some possible reasons. There built. We’ve run into a stone wall with the local council, but it is was a split in 1917 when the David Martin people left the Old a complete community with ordained ministry. Order church and started their own. (Today they are officially Page 3 Old Order Old Order congregations/meetinghouses Communities in Waterloo-Wellington Mount Forest Other Perth Ontario, 2015 1900 South Peel (1901) 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 Olivet (1955) 1960 Linwood (1962) Winterbourne (1965) 1970 Spring Creek (1972) Weaverland (1976) 1980 Farewell (1979) Cedarview (1981) 1990 Klearview (1990) Northbend (1998) Chesley 2000 Creekbank (2000) Westdale (1997) Martinfield (1998) Kinloss Mapleton (2008) Riverdale (2003) Hillside (2005) Chesley 2010 Martindale (2010) Langside (2007) Kinloss Elmadale (2013) Valleyview (2009)Lindsay White Pine (2009) Massey Lee Valley (2010) Massey Clover Valley (2011) Kinloss Taylor (2014) Matheson known as the Independent Old Order Mennonites.) And then in Why did the church mushroom so much in the last half the 1930s many people left the Old Orders and joined the Bible of the twentieth century? One reason they stayed, I believe, Chapel or Plymouth Brethren. Their meetings were held in is leadership. By the 1950s and 60s, the leadership of the Old Hawkesville. Order Mennonite Church had a strong sense of what it means to The reason for this movement was less cultural and more be a Mennonite; what it means to be Anabaptist; what it means theological. A new way of looking at faith and salvation was to be Old Order; what it means to be plain and separate from introduced and it shook the foundations of the Old Order the world. A few people left because they were unhappy with Mennonite Church. A considerable number of people left to join that type of aggressive leadership, but the church prospered.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Theoretical Implications of the Beachy Amish-Mennonites DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Th
    Theoretical Implications of the Beachy Amish-Mennonites DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Cory Alexander Anderson Graduate Program in Rural Sociology The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Joseph Donnermeyer, Advisor Richard Moore Edward Crenshaw Copyrighted by Cory Alexander Anderson 2014 Abstract One of the hallmarks of social science is the interaction of theory and methods/data, the former guiding the latter and the latter refining the former, in a cyclical relationship. The goal of theory is to provide explanations for and even predict a range of human behaviors. One potential cause of theoretical stagnation is an over focus on a singular, usually easily accessible group. Given the persistence of plain Anabaptists like the Amish as a highly distinct subgroup in American society, their utility for refining sociological theories is persuasive, but has rarely been employed to this end because of their social inaccessibility, shyness towards social science research, and the popular interpretive frames placed on them that distract would-be investigators. Even with Amish-focused scholarship, the emphasis has been largely on describing the population or applying theory to understand the Amish case, but not returning findings back to theory in critique and revision. This dissertation introduces and contextualizes the plain Anabaptists, then describes the Beachy Amish-Mennonites, a group within the Amish religious tension, but dealing markedly with tensions between separatism and assimilation. Following this introduction are three independent studies that demonstrate the use of plain Anabaptists to refine theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Add'l Patents Pending
    Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, Oct 1998 v44 i4 p538 The Influence of Culture on Pretend Play: The Case of Mennonite Children. Stephanie M. Carlson; Marjorie Taylor; Gerald R. Levin. Full Text: COPYRIGHT 1998 Wayne State University Press Teacher attitudes about pretend play were compared in Old Order Mennonite, New Order Mennonite, and non-Mennonite Christian schools. These subcultures differ in modernity, media exposure, and encouragement of pretend play. Non-Mennonite teachers were the most positive about pretend play, but Old Order Mennonite teachers were the most positive about private fantasies (e.g., imaginary companions). Although the proportion of children's pretend play at recess did not differ across groups, Old Order Mennonite children's play themes adhered more closely to real-life family roles. Teacher attitudes about pretend play were related to the imaginativeness of children's social play. These findings suggest it is important to investigate the influence of culture on pretend play in both social and nonsocial contexts and the processes by which this influence occurs. Although the capacity and inclination to pretend seem to appear spontaneously in all normally developing children as they acquire the ability to use symbols and engage in representational thought (Piaget, 1962), research on individual differences indicates that the sociocultural context is also crucial to the developmental course of pretense (e.g., Farver, 1992; Gaskins & Goncu, 1992; Haight & Miller, 1993). In many western middle- class families, pretend play is considered beneficial for young children and involvement in fantasy is strongly encouraged. For example, the first books read to many children are about fairies, talking animals, mermaids, and the like.
    [Show full text]
  • The Secret of the Strength What Would the Anabaptists Tell This Generation?
    The Secret of the Strength What Would the Anabaptists Tell This Generation? Peter Hoover This is the 2008 version of the text, with the original introduction, forward, cover picture, etc. The text has been revised, but is substantially the same as the original text, with the addition of pictures. Other inspiring books are available at: www.PrimitiveChristianity.org Introduction I well remember the first time I faced the stark realization that I was a Mennonite and different. My fourth-grade friend, Gregory, and I were riding home from public school on the bus. We were talking about our future, how we would always be friends and do things together when we grew up. Then he enthusiastically began to describe activities that from my upbringing I knew to be worldly. Desperate to save our lifelong friendship, I turned to Gregory and said, “You will have to leave your church and become a Mennonite when you grow up.” Thus, the inevitability of our way of life impressed itself on my eight-year-old mind. A year later I made my decision to follow Christ. Of course, Gregory never joined my church, and I do not even know his whereabouts today. The theme of separation from the world ran strong in the Cumberland Valley of Pennsylvania where I grew up. But I wrongly assumed that, except for our plainness, we believed the same things that other Christians believed. Then one evening at the Chambersburg Mennonite Church, where I was a member, a visiting speaker jolted me with a graphic picture of my martyr heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect repmduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscn'pt and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing fmm left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manusuipt have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6' x 9' black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustmtions appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell 8 HowaH Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 USA EARLY SEVENTEENTH CENTURY MENNONITE CONFESSIONS OF FAITH: THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ANABAPTIST TRADITION by Karl Peter Koop A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Theology of the University of St. Michae18s College and the Department of Theology of the Toronto School of Theology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Theology awarded by the University of St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Sociolinguistic Identities of the Beachy Amish- Mennonites
    Journal of Amish and Plain Anabaptist Studies Volume 7 Issue 1 Special issue: The Beachy Amish- Article 12 Mennonite Churches 2019 The Changing Sociolinguistic Identities of the Beachy Amish- Mennonites Joshua Brown Follow this and additional works at: https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/amishstudies Part of the Linguistics Commons Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Recommended Citation Brown, Joshua R. 2019. "The Changing Sociolinguistic Identities of the Beachy Amish-Mennonites." Journal of Amish and Plain Anabaptist Studies 7(1):19-31. This Original Research Article is brought to you for free and open access by IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The University of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Amish and Plain Anabaptist Studies by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Changing Sociolinguistic Identities of the Beachy Amish- Mennonites JOSHUA R. BROWN Associate Professor of German and Linguistics Department of Languages University of Wisconsin—Eau Claire Abstract: The study of Beachy Amish-Mennonite identities is a complex endeavor. As a loosely- organized fellowship, the Beachys have no overarching governing body that dictates symbols of their Anabaptist commitment to nonconformity. Often Beachys are described as existing on a religious continuum between the Old Order Amish and Mennonites, yet defining Beachys as what they are not does not adequately establish the religious identities that Beachys negotiate for themselves. This article addresses the negotiation of sociolinguistic identities—where language and religious identities intersect—alongside cultural change for two Beachy congregations in Central Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario Mennonite History:Ontmennohistory20-1.Pdf
    Tribute to ORLAND GINGERICH 1920-2002 MHSO CHARTER MEMBER Ontario MHSO vice-president 1965 -1977 Mennonite MHSO President 1977 -1980 Orland spent his early years on the farm cleared by his great-grandfather History Jacob W. Gingerich in the late 1820s. It was located on the German Block (the centre section of Wilmot Township) west of Waterloo Township . It had been THE surveyed in 1824, in anticipation of the coming of immigrants from Europe NEWSLETTER following the 1822 visit of Christian Nafziger, looking for land to which to OF THE bring his family and co-religionists . The Gingerich family were members of MENNONITE the first Amish congregation organized in Canada . While studying church history at HISTORICAL Goshen Biblical Seminary under Harold S. Bender in 1948 Orland was required to SOCIETY OF ONTARIO write a 5000 word essay on some aspect of church history. He chose to write about the Amish in Canada but found a lack of data on the subject. Bender promised Orland leniency provided he continue the Or/and Gingerich research and produce a more comprehensive history later. VOLUME XX In 1975 an historical plaque was NUMBER 1 When 35 people interested in created by the Ontario Heritage promoting research and publication of Foundation, at the initiative of the Ontario Mennonite History met at Conrad Waterloo Historical Society. It was MAY 2002 Grebel College on May 8, 1965, Orland erected on the cemetery grounds across addressed the group on the topic "Why a the road from the Steinmann Mennonite Mennonite Historical Society'?" Dr. J.W. Church in honour of the early Amish ISSN 1192-5515 Fretz, president of the College, chaired the settlers of Wilmot Township .
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Hutterite Breastfeeding Patterns
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2006 Analysis of Hutterite breastfeeding patterns Christine Smith The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Smith, Christine, "Analysis of Hutterite breastfeeding patterns" (2006). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5556. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5556 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY The University of Montana Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. **Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature** Yes, I grant permission \f No, I do not grant permission______ Author's Signature: . Date: .^Q|/q (/> Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's explicit consent. AN ANALYSIS OF HUTTERITE BREASTFEEDING PATTERNS by Christine Smith B.A. University of Montana, 1999 presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The University of Montana May 2006 Approved by rperson Dean, Graduate School Date UMI Number: EP41020 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • The Growth of Amish and Plain Anabaptists in Kentucky
    The Growth of Amish and Plain Anabaptists in Kentucky Joseph Donnermeyer1 Professor Emeritus School of Environment and Natural Resource The Ohio State University Cory Anderson Adjunct Professor Rural Sociology Ohio State Agricultural Technical Institute Abstract This article examines the growth of Amish and plain Anabaptist communities and population in Kentucky, one of the few southern states with a sizeable plain Anabaptist presence across much of its rural areas. Within the Amish religious tradition, this study focuses on both the broadly defined Old Order Amish, namely, those who prohibit ownership of motor vehicles for transportation, and the Amish-Mennonites, those who allow ownership. We provide an overview of their community formation and present a county-based estimate of their population. There are now 53 Amish communities in Kentucky, and a population of nearly 10,000. Over half (27) of these communities were founded since the turn of the century. Non-Amish, plain Anabaptists constitute 33 congregations. Keywords Old Order Amish; New Order Amish; Swartzentruber Amish; Amish-Mennonites; Ambassadors Amish-Mennonites; Old Order Mennonites; Conservative Mennonites; Intentional churches; Church districts; Settlements; Community migration Note This profile of the Amish is the second in an anticipated series of articles whose intent is to provide regionally based spatial-demographic descriptions of Amish communities. The first described buggy-driving Amish churches in Iowa (Cooksey and Donnermeyer 2013). Donnermeyer, Joseph, and Cory Anderson. 2014. “The Growth of Amish and Plain Anabaptists in Kentucky.” Journal of Amish and Plain Anabaptist Studies 2(2):215-44. 216 Journal of Amish and Plain Anabaptist Studies 2(2), 2014 Introduction From a sociological point of view, the Amish can be described as a subculture, religious sect, and ethnic group (Anderson 2013a; Hostetler 1993, 5-18; McQuire 2002, 163).
    [Show full text]
  • What Are the Plain Anabaptists? -- Anderson
    Who Are the Plain Anabaptists? What Are the Plain Anabaptists? -- Anderson Who Are the Plain Anabaptists? What Are the Plain Anabaptists? Cory Anderson1 OSU Presidential Fellow and Doctoral Candidate in Rural Sociology School of Environment and Natural Resources The Ohio State University Abstract: I define the plain Anabaptists by answering two essential questions: “Who are the plain Anabaptists” and “What are the plain Anabaptists?” In asking “Who are the plain Anabaptists?” I investigate several dimensions of identity. First, I trace the history of seven religious traditions within Anabaptism: the Swiss Brethren/Mennonites, the Low German/Russian Mennonites, the Hutterites, the Amish, the Brethren, the Apostolic Christian Churches, and the Bruderhof. Second, I explore three categories of people in each group—mainline, conservative, and Old Order—describing the last two as “plain.” Third, I explore scales and indices on which plainness is measured, as well as other measures of who the plain Anabaptist people are. In asking “What are the plain Anabaptists?” I define several ways social scientists conceptualize and describe the plain Anabaptists. I organize the sundry definitions and frames under three categories: the plain Anabaptists as a religious group, as an ethnicity, and as a social system. Keywords: Mennonite, Amish, Brethren, Hutterite, Apostolic Christian, Bruderhof, religious traditions, ethnicity, social system 26 | Page Journal of Amish and Plain Anabaptist Studies, Volume 1, Issue 1 (April), 2013 Introduction The inauguration
    [Show full text]
  • Chortitza “Old” Colony, 1789
    -being the Magazine/Journal of the Hanover Steinbach Historical Society Inc. Preservings $20.00 No. 20, June, 2002 “A people who have not the pride to record their own history will not long have the virtues to make their history worth recording; and no people who are indifferent to their past need hope to make their future great.” — Jan Gleysteen Chortitza “Old” Colony, 1789 The story of the first settlement of the Flemish Mennonites at the junc- tion of the Chortitza and Dnjepr Riv- ers in 1789 in Imperial Russia is re- plete with drama, tension and trag- edy. It is no small task to establish a peaceful Christian community in an undeveloped steppe and to create an environment where the pioneers and their descendants could thrive and prosper. Within a century the Chortitza “Old” Colony had become perhaps the most prosperous com- munity in the area north of the Black Sea and its industries were leading the way in the region’s booming economy. After some initial faltering the Chortitza Flemish Gemeinde was to become the most stable and flourish- ing of the Mennonites in Russia. It is a precious gift of God to build a large congregation of 4000 and more mem- bers out of a population originating from different Gemeinden and vari- ous regions in the Vistula Delta in Royal Poland and West Prussia. The German Wehrmacht at the entrance to the turbine building of Dnjeproges Hydro-electric dam, June 1941. To God had granted the Flemish pio- the left is the Hydro-electric dam; right, in the rear, the Island of Chortitza with the Mennonite village established neers noble and spirit-filled leaders in 1789; and middle, the bridge over the “new” Dnjepr (east channel).
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews
    BOOK REVIEWS Horse-and-Buggy Genius: Listening to Mennonites Contest the Modern World. By Royden Loewen. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press. 2016. Pp. 243. $31.95, U.S.; $27.95, Can. Royden Loewen’s Horse-and-Buggy Genius: Listening to Mennonites Contest the Modern World is the result of a three-year oral history project undertaken to study how the Old Order Mennonites of Ontario, Canada, and Old Colony Mennonites of Latin America have resisted modernity. Both subject groups are linked to Canada. While the Old Order Mennonites have been residents of southern Ontario for generations, their Old Colony counterparts left Canada in the early part of the twentieth century to seek religious freedom in Mexico and then, eventually, to Belize, Paraguay, and Bolivia. Both groups share a commitment to keeping their lives technologically simple and living their beliefs in farming communities close to nature, separated from modern, mainstream society. Their stories of faith and resistance make this work fascinating reading. The first two chapters of Horse-and-Buggy Genius focus on the Old Order Mennonites. The first chapter, “Changelessness in Canada’s Heartland,” introduces the Old Order Mennonites, who have lived for decades surrounded by modern Canadian society and have confronted social change head on. According to Loewen, the stories community members recounted to him and his team of graduate and undergraduate researchers focused on daily farm life and family interaction, making clear the importance of farm and family to faith along with the challenges posed by even small technological innovations. In the second chapter, “A New Orthodoxy in Backwoods Ontario,” he explores the lives of Orthodox Old Order Mennonites, who left the Waterloo Old Order Mennonite community to found a new community in Gorrie, Ontario, that restricts technology more than the parent group has done, in effect turning back the clock to a simpler way of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Internal Dynamics of the Old Order Migration Process
    Circle Letters, Produce Auctions, and Softball Games: Investigating the Internal Dynamics of the Old Order Migration Process A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Kenneth D. Shonkwiler May 2014 © 2014 Kenneth D. Shonkwiler. All Rights Reserved. 2 This thesis titled Circle Letters, Produce Auctions, and Softball Games: Investigating the Internal Dynamics of the Old Order Migration Process by KENNETH D. SHONKWILER has been approved for the Department of Geography and the College of Arts and Sciences by Timothy G. Anderson Associate Professor of Geography Robert Frank Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT SHONKWILER, KENNETH D., M.A, May 2014. Geography Circle Letter, Produce Auctions, and Softball Games: Investigating the Internal Dynamics of the Old Order Migration Process Director of Thesis: Timothy G. Anderson Currently, the Old Order Anabaptist population is one of the fastest growing religious groups in the United States. As members decide to continue with their socio- religious traditions, they become faced with the heightened possibility of migrating to a new settlement area, leaving the communities in which their groups have inhabited for close to two centuries. Semi-structured interviews and one oral history were carried out with thirteen members of a newly formed Stauffer Mennonite community in Ohio. Results of this study revealed that social networks were instrumental in the migration process. Strong personal ties characterized their network connections, providing ethnically-specific resources, information, and entrance into the destination area. Through their social status within the community, “pioneer” migrants acted with relative degrees of agency within the network connections of subsequent individuals, regardless of their own connection to individuals.
    [Show full text]