DOCSLIB.ORG

Oliver Dowden Dear Daniel Kawczynski, Culture Recovery

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Oliver Dowden Rt Hon Oliver Dowden MP Secretary of State DCMS 4th Floor 100 Parliament Street London SW1A 2BQ E: [email protected] www.gov.uk/dcms Dear Daniel Kawczynski, Culture Recovery Funding in Shrewsbury and Atcham constituency Our world-class cultural, creative and heritage sectors have been some of the hardest hit by Covid-19, and in July last year, the Government announced an unprecedented £1.57 billion support package to see them through the crisis. So far, over £1 billion worth of funding from the Culture Recovery Fund has been allocated across the United Kingdom. This includes over £800 million to almost 3800 arts, culture and heritage organisations in England, helping to support at least 75,000 jobs. As you know, £258 million was held back as a contingency and formed the basis of a second round of grant and repayable finance funding (totalling £400 million) which was announced in December, and closed in late January (1 February for the BFI). Today we announced the outcome of that second round across both grants and repayable finance. Within this second round, over £390 million worth of funding has been allocated to over 2,700 arts, culture and heritage organisations in England that met the core criteria of cultural or heritage significance, and could also demonstrate clear financial need. It will support organisations’ transition from the challenging months of lockdowns and social distancing to welcoming audiences and visitors back to the country’s theatres, museums, cinemas, music venues and heritage sites. This brings the total support to date from the Culture Recovery Fund to over £1.2 billion for over 5000 cultural and heritage organisations or sites in England. This is in addition to the £188 million for culture in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland Administrations and £100 million in direct support to the national cultural institutions sponsored by DCMS, such as the British Museum, and English Heritage Trust. This includes support for some of the UK’s most iconic cultural organisations, including Canterbury Cathedral; The Lowry, Salford; Northern Ballet and many others. This second round of funding has had a clear impact: we know it has supported thousands of jobs, with broader impacts across supply chain organisations and for freelancers who will benefit from new work being created and new activity as cultural organisations reopen. It has also delivered on this government’s continued commitment to levelling up, with over 70% of revenue grants awarded outside of London. I am now in a position to update you on exactly how and where this money is being distributed - including in your constituency. Your local area From the funding distributed in Round 2, 13 awards have been made in your constituency so far, totalling £992,463. You will find a list of all the cultural organisations that received funding in your constituency in the annex of this letter. These figures are correct as at 29 March 2021. We would be delighted for you to support reaching this momentous milestone in the following ways: - Carry out a virtual visit or, where public health guidelines allow, a visit, to a local Fund beneficiary as organisations begin opening up; and - Promote how your constituency has benefited on social media, using #HereforCulture to amplify your post. Please see the HereForCulture toolkit for further assets Next steps At March’s Budget, the Chancellor announced an additional £300 million to support theatres, museums and other cultural organisations in England through the Culture Recovery Fund. This extra funding, together with other cultural support such as separate additional Covid support funding for our fifteen national museums and galleries, means that our total support package for culture during the pandemic is now approaching £2 billion. These are unprecedented sums. The £300 million for the Fund will continue to support key cultural organisations; ensure the sector remains viable as audiences begin to return; and continue to ensure a vibrant future for the culture sector as we emerge from the pandemic. Therefore, there will be a further opportunity for cultural and heritage organisations in your constituency to seek support for their costs this year. Further details on this package will be announced soon. If organisations are in urgent financial need before this they should reach out to the relevant delivery body (such as the Arts Council, Heritage Fund or British Film Institute) immediately. Finally, do look out for the launch of the three competitive funds in the separate Cultural Investment Fund package later this month, which comes on top of the nearly £2 billion in Covid- 19 support packages. The Cultural Investment Fund includes the Libraries Improvement Fund, the Museums Estates and Development Fund and the second round of the Cultural Development Fund. These will provide much-needed predominantly capital investment into our local libraries, regional museums, and locally-led cultural and creative initiatives. Another opportunity to boost local cultural investment in the near future is the UK City of Culture 2025 competition, which will launch soon. We welcome ambitious and exciting bids from your constituencies that will help places across the country prosper and unleash their full potential as we recover from the impact of Covid-19. Rt Hon Oliver Dowden CBE MP Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport ANNEX: Full list of awards in Shrewsbury and Atcham constituency that have received funding via the Culture Recovery Fund in Round 2* *Awards are based on applicant postcode. Please note, if an organisation appears multiple times, this is due to them receiving awards across different funding streams, within the Culture Recovery Fund. Shrewsbury Abbey (£19,000 ) Shropshire Tourism (UK) Ltd (£12,300 ) Shropshire Wildlife Trust (£17,000 ) Wildcard (£36,725 ) Get Your Wigle On (£142,000 ) Shrewsbury Food festival Ltd (£27,500 ) Shrewsbury Folk Festival (£45,265 ) HMM Arts Ltd (The Hive) (£30,000 ) Shropshire Council (£532,978 ) Disability Arts in Shropshire (£35,000 ) Upstart Projects (£19,695 ) Shropshire Festivals Ltd (£50,000 ) THE GREEN GATHERING (£25,000 ) .
Recommended publications
  • The Kremlin Trojan Horses | the Atlantic Council

    The Kremlin Trojan Horses | the Atlantic Council

    Atlantic Council DINU PATRICIU EURASIA CENTER THE KREMLIN’S TROJAN HORSES Alina Polyakova, Marlene Laruelle, Stefan Meister, and Neil Barnett Foreword by Radosław Sikorski THE KREMLIN’S TROJAN HORSES Russian Influence in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom Alina Polyakova, Marlene Laruelle, Stefan Meister, and Neil Barnett Foreword by Radosław Sikorski ISBN: 978-1-61977-518-3. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Foreword Introduction: The Kremlin’s Toolkit of Influence 3 in Europe 7 France: Mainstreaming Russian Influence 13 Germany: Interdependence as Vulnerability 20 United Kingdom: Vulnerable but Resistant Policy recommendations: Resisting Russia’s 27 Efforts to Influence, Infiltrate, and Inculcate 29 About the Authors THE KREMLIN’S TROJAN HORSES FOREWORD In 2014, Russia seized Crimea through military force. With this act, the Kremlin redrew the political map of Europe and upended the rules of the acknowledged international order. Despite the threat Russia’s revanchist policies pose to European stability and established international law, some European politicians, experts, and civic groups have expressed support for—or sympathy with—the Kremlin’s actions. These allies represent a diverse network of political influence reaching deep into Europe’s core. The Kremlin uses these Trojan horses to destabilize European politics so efficiently, that even Russia’s limited might could become a decisive factor in matters of European and international security.
  • Download Thesis

    Download Thesis

    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ ANGLO-SAUDI CULTURAL RELATIONS CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF BILATERAL TIES, 1950- 2010 Alhargan, Haya Saleh Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 1 ANGLO-SAUDI CULTURAL RELATIONS: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF BILATERAL TIES, 1950-2010 by Haya Saleh AlHargan Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Middle East and Mediterranean Studies Programme King’s College University of London 2015 2 ABSTRACT This study investigates Anglo-Saudi cultural relations from 1950 to 2010, with the aim of greater understanding the nature of those relations, analysing the factors affecting them and examining their role in enhancing cultural relations between the two countries.
  • Turkey's EU Accession As a Factor in the 2016 Brexit Referendum

    Turkey's EU Accession As a Factor in the 2016 Brexit Referendum

    James Ker-Lindsay Turkey’s EU accession as a factor in the 2016 Brexit referendum Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Ker-Lindsay James. (2017). Turkey’s EU accession as a factor in the 2016 Brexit referendum. Turkish Studies. ISSN 1468-3849. DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2017.1366860 © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/83691/ Available in LSE Research Online: October 2017 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Turkey’s EU Accession as a Factor in the 2016 Brexit Referendum James Ker-Lindsay European Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom Email: [email protected] Twitter http://www.twitter.com/JamesKerLindsay Biographical note James Ker-Lindsay is Senior Visiting Fellow at the European Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science and Research Associate at the Centre for International Studies at the University of Oxford.
  • At This Election We Risk Losing So Much of What We Value in Our Society

    At This Election We Risk Losing So Much of What We Value in Our Society

    At this election we risk losing so much of what we value in our society. The Green Party will stand up for what matters. A properly funded NHS, free from the threat of the profit motive. Good schools for all our children, so they can make the most of their potential without being selected by ability or restricted by a narrow regime of testing Young people should have the opportunities that my generation had – a free university education and the freedom to live, work and study abroad We welcome EU citizens and want them to stay; not have their family life and work prospects threatened. We'll give the public a vote on the terms of the Brexit deal. Protection for the environment and urgent action on climate change. The UK's commitment to the Paris climate change agreement is meaningless without action. Instead of undermining renewable energy technology and its potential to create jobs, the Green Party will invest in them. We won't subsidise fossil fuels or the white elephant that is Hinkley nuclear power station. We'll invest in public transport, walking and cycling, and scrap the major roads programme. Green Party membership and votes are growing locally and across the country. Shrewsbury has just elected its first Green member of Shropshire Council and the town council. If elected I'd support farmers and small businesses against the harmful effects of a hard Brexit; campaign against the damaging and wasteful North West Relief Road; and work to keep local public services strong and properly funded. I've lived in Shrewsbury since 2000 and my two children went to Meole Brace School and Shrewsbury Sixth Form College.
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim

    THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim

    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
  • Version 1 South Kesteven DC Pro-Forma for Service Plans Period

    Version 1 South Kesteven DC Pro-Forma for Service Plans Period

    Version 1 South Kesteven DC Pro-forma for Service Plans st Period of the Plan Prescriptive for the financial year beginning 1 April 2006. Indicative for the following two years Development Control Service: Service Manager: Richard Edwards Corporate Context The LSP – The Joined-up Approach As a leading member of the South Kesteven Local Strategic Partnership, the Council has worked closely with representatives of the business, voluntary and public sector to profile the needs of the area. This has resulted in the LSP adopting the following long-term vision: To ensure that by 2020 our residents live in one of the ten most desirable locations in the country and are proud that they have the skills necessary to participate in sustainable communities that are safe, healthy and economically vibrant”. In order to translate this vision into action, the LSP has approved the following four priorities, which will guide the new Community Strategy currently being prepared: a) Community safety and health. b) Housing and sustainable communities c) Town centres and economic development d) Improved transport and access. SKDC – The Vision The District council’s vision complements and supports the vision of the LSP it is: ‘To ensure that the residents of South Kesteven are proud of their district and their Council’ This concept of “Pride” is articulated as a series of five steps detailed in a series of leaflets: a) Performance and Priorities b) Respect and recognition for diversity c) Informing and Involving d) Developing Communities e) Empowering and enabling SKDC - Strategic Alignment In making strategic choices regarding service delivery the Council has taken account of the shared priorities that have been agreed at national level between representatives from Local Government and the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM).
  • 2001 Census Report for Parliamentary Constituencies

    2001 Census Report for Parliamentary Constituencies

    Reference maps Page England and Wales North East: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 42 North West: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 43 Yorkshire & The Humber: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 44 East Midlands: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 45 West Midlands: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 46 East of England: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 47 London: County & Parliamentary Constituencies 48 South East: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 49 South West: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 50 Wales: Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies 51 Scotland Scotland: Scottish Parliamentary Regions 52 Central Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 53 Glasgow Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 54 Highlands and Islands Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 55 Lothians Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 56 Mid Scotland and Fife Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 57 North East Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 58 South of Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 59 West of Scotland Region: Parliamentary Constituencies 60 Northern Ireland Northern Ireland: Parliamentary Constituencies 61 41 Reference maps Census 2001: Report for Parliamentary Constituencies North East: Counties, Unitary Authorities & Parliamentary Constituencies Key government office region parliamentary constituencies counties
  • A Study of Identity, Ethics and Power in the Relationship Between Britain and the United Kingdom Overseas Territories

    A Study of Identity, Ethics and Power in the Relationship Between Britain and the United Kingdom Overseas Territories

    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk 04 University of Plymouth Research Theses 01 Research Theses Main Collection 2013 Distant Relations: A Study of Identity, Ethics and Power in the Relationship Between Britain and the United Kingdom Overseas Territories Harmer, Nichola http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/1575 University of Plymouth All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. DISTANT RELATIONS: A STUDY OF IDENTITY, ETHICS AND POWER IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BRITAIN AND THE UNITED KINGDOM OVERSEAS TERRITORIES By NICHOLA HARMER A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences Faculty of Science December 2012 This copy of the thesis has been supplied on the condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the author’s prior consent. ABSTRACT Nichola Harmer DISTANT RELATIONS: A STUDY OF IDENTITY, ETHICS AND POWER IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BRITAIN AND THE UNITED KINGDOM OVERSEAS TERRITORIES This thesis contributes to new understandings of the contemporary relationship between Britain and the fourteen remaining United Kingdom Overseas Territories. By examining the discourse of social and political elites in Britain and in several Overseas Territories, it identifies the significance of the role of identity in shaping perceptions and relations between these international actors.
  • Westminster Parliamentary Constituency Parking Or Street Parking Off-Street Parking Households Parking Or Parking Or Parking Potential Potential Potential

    Westminster Parliamentary Constituency Parking Or Street Parking Off-Street Parking Households Parking Or Parking Or Parking Potential Potential Potential

    Households Households Proportion of with off-street without off- households with Total Westminster Parliamentary Constituency parking or street parking off-street parking households parking or parking or parking potential potential potential Makerfield 43,151 37,502 5,649 87% Sefton Central 36,870 31,835 5,035 86% Rother Valley 43,277 37,156 6,121 86% St Helens North 45,216 38,745 6,471 86% Alyn and Deeside 36,961 31,455 5,506 85% Don Valley 44,413 37,454 6,959 84% Stoke-on-Trent South 40,222 33,856 6,366 84% Hemsworth 44,346 37,093 7,253 84% Leigh 47,922 40,023 7,899 84% Cheadle 40,075 33,373 6,702 83% Knowsley 49,055 40,840 8,215 83% Ellesmere Port and Neston 41,209 34,289 6,920 83% South Ribble 43,214 35,946 7,268 83% Wyre and Preston North 41,121 34,181 6,940 83% Doncaster North 44,508 36,929 7,579 83% Delyn 31,517 26,116 5,401 83% Vale of Clwyd 32,766 27,083 5,683 83% Islwyn 33,336 27,431 5,905 82% Caerphilly 38,136 31,371 6,765 82% Bridgend 37,089 30,418 6,671 82% Llanelli 37,886 31,008 6,878 82% Wirral South 32,535 26,623 5,912 82% Aberavon 30,961 25,333 5,628 82% Wirral West 31,312 25,549 5,763 82% East Dunbartonshire 35,778 29,131 6,647 81% Elmet and Rothwell 45,553 37,037 8,516 81% Barnsley East 42,702 34,711 7,991 81% Blackpool North and Cleveleys 38,710 31,423 7,287 81% Redcar 40,869 33,166 7,703 81% Gower 36,618 29,704 6,914 81% St Helens South and Whiston 48,009 38,931 9,078 81% Congleton 46,229 37,449 8,780 81% Mid Derbyshire 38,073 30,812 7,261 81% Scunthorpe 39,213 31,683 7,530 81% Penistone and Stocksbridge 40,347 32,557
  • 2007 No. 2878 REPRESENTATION of THE

    2007 No. 2878 REPRESENTATION of THE

    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2007 No. 2878 REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE The Returning Officers (Parliamentary Constituencies) (England) Order 2007 Made - - - - 3rd October 2007 Coming into force in accordance with article 1(2) The Secretary of State makes the following Order in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 24(1)(c) and (e) and 28(1)(b) of the Representation of the People Act 1983(a). In accordance with section 7(1) and (2)(c) of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000(b), he has consulted the Electoral Commission. Citation, commencement and interpretation 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Returning Officers (Parliamentary Constituencies) (England) Order 2007. (2) This Order comes into force— (a) for the purposes of proceedings preliminary or relating to a parliamentary election to be held after the issue of a proclamation by Her Majesty summoning a new Parliament, on 5th October 2007; and (b) for all other purposes, on the issue of a proclamation by Her Majesty summoning a new Parliament. (3) References to constituencies in this Order are references to those constituencies in England constituted by an Order in Council made under section 4 of the Parliamentary Constituencies Act 1986(c). Revocations 2. Subject to article 1(2), the following Orders are revoked— (a) the Returning Officers (Parliamentary Constituencies) (England) Order 1995(d); (b) the Returning Officers (Parliamentary Constituencies) (England) (Amendment) Order 1996(e); (a) 1983 c.2. Section 24(1)(c) was amended by paragraph 68(3) of Schedule 16 to the Local Government (Wales) Act 1994 (c.19). Section 24(1)(e) was amended by S.I.
  • Committees on Arms Export Controls: Unauthorised Disclosures of Draft Report on Use of UK- Manufactured Arms in Yemen

    Committees on Arms Export Controls: Unauthorised Disclosures of Draft Report on Use of UK- Manufactured Arms in Yemen

    House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee Committees on Arms Export Controls: unauthorised disclosures of draft Report on Use of UK- manufactured arms in Yemen Seventh Special Report of Session 2016–17 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 10 January 2017 HC 935 Published on 18 January 2017 by authority of the House of Commons The Foreign Affairs Committee The Foreign Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Crispin Blunt MP (Conservative, Reigate) (Chair) Mr John Baron MP (Conservative, Basildon and Billericay) Ann Clwyd MP (Labour, Cynon Valley) Mike Gapes MP (Labour (Co-op), Ilford South) Stephen Gethins MP (Scottish National Party, North East Fife) Mr Mark Hendrick MP (Labour (Co-op), Preston) Adam Holloway MP (Conservative, Gravesham) Daniel Kawczynski MP (Conservative, Shrewsbury and Atcham) Ian Murray MP (Labour, Edinburgh South) Andrew Rosindell MP (Conservative, Romford) Nadhim Zahawi MP (Conservative, Stratford-on-Avon) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/facom and in print by Order of the House. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Chris Stanton (Clerk), Nick Beech (Second Clerk), Dr Ariella Huff (Senior Committee Specialist), Ashlee Godwin and Nicholas Wade (Committee Specialists), Clare Genis (Senior Committee Assistant), James Hockaday and Su Panchanathan (Committee Assistants), and Estelle Currie (Media Officer).
  • Core Strategy

    Core Strategy

    Shropshire Local Development Framework : Adopted Core Strategy March 2011 “A Flourishing Shropshire” Shropshire Sustainable Community Strategy 2010-2020 Contents Page 1 Introduction 1 2 Spatial Portrait 7 Shropshire in 2010 7 Communities 9 Economy 10 Environment 13 Spatial Zones in Shropshire 14 3 The Challenges We Face 27 Spatial Vision 28 Strategic Objectives 30 4 Creating Sustainable Places 34 Policy CS1: Strategic Approach 35 Policy CS2: Shrewsbury Development Strategy 42 Policy CS3: The Market Towns and Other Key Centres 48 Policy CS4: Community Hubs and Community Clusters 61 Policy CS5: Countryside and Green Belt 65 Policy CS6: Sustainable Design and Development Principles 69 Policy CS7: Communications and Transport 73 Policy CS8: Facilities, Services and Infrastructure Provision 77 Policy CS9: Infrastructure Contributions 79 5 Meeting Housing Needs 82 Policy CS10: Managed Release of Housing Land 82 Policy CS11: Type and Affordability of Housing 85 Policy CS12: Gypsies and Traveller Provision 89 6 A Prosperous Economy 92 Policy CS13: Economic Development, Enterprise and Employment 93 Policy CS14: Managed Release of Employment Land 96 Policy CS15: Town and Rural Centres 100 Policy CS16: Tourism, Culture and Leisure 104 7 Environment 108 Policy CS17: Environmental Networks 108 Policy CS18: Sustainable Water Management 111 Policy CS19: Waste Management Infrastructure 115 Policy CS20: Strategic Planning for Minerals 120 Contents Page 8 Appendix 1: Saved Local and Structure Plan Policies replaced by the Core Strategy 126 9 Glossary 138