Evaluation of Safety Enforcement on Changing Driver Behavior – Runs on Red, Volume 1 January 2003

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluation of Safety Enforcement on Changing Driver Behavior – Runs on Red, Volume 1 January 2003 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2002/12-1 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Evaluation of Safety Enforcement on Changing Driver Behavior – Runs on Red, Volume 1 January 2003 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Andrzej P. Tarko and Naredla Lakshmi Kanth Reddy FHWA/IN/JTRP-2002/12-1 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Joint Transportation Research Program 1284 Civil Engineering Building Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 47907-1284 11. Contract or Grant No. SPR-2484 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Indiana Department of Transportation State Office Building Final Report 100 North Senate Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46204 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Prepared in cooperation with the Indiana Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract Red light running (RLR) is a dangerous act. Approximately 22% of urban crashes at signalized intersections are caused nationwide by RLR. Nearly 1,036 deaths were caused nationwide by RLR in the year 2000. Indiana had no previous research conducted in this area; therefore, this research was aimed at estimating the RLR problem in Indiana. The other objectives of this research included: learning drivers’ opinions on the problem, studying the effectiveness of selected countermeasures, and studying the legal issues related to photo-enforcement. A crash statistics study, telephone survey, and extended monitoring of a selected intersection were the three major approaches chosen to estimate the magnitude of the problem. The crash statistics for the 1997-1999 period showed that 22% of signalized intersection crashes were caused in Indiana by RLR. RLR preceded 50% of fatal crashes at these intersections. The telephone survey showed that 67% of Indiana drivers felt that RLR was a problem in the state. Twelve percent of them claimed to have been involved in a RLR crash. The extended monitoring of the through movements at the study intersection also recorded a considerable violation rate. These results indicate that RLR may be considered a problem in Indiana. Traffic at a selected intersection in West Lafayette, Indiana, was videotaped and the video material was used to detect the red light violations. The expected number of drivers arriving at the start of the red signal has been proposed as a true measure of exposure to RLR. We call it an opportunity for RLR. This exposure was used to estimate the RLR rate. The statistical significance of the difference in the RLR rates between different periods was estimated using binomial distribution. Police enforcement was evaluated and found to reduce the violation rate by approximately 75% in the week immediately after the enforcement. A reduction of 37% was observed after another two weeks. The photo- enforcement reduced the violation rate by 62% during the week of enforcement and by 35% during the week immediately following. Young people violated red lights more frequently than other drivers. The legal issues that related to RLR and photo-enforcement were studied. The present state law in Indiana does not support the use of photo-enforcement. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement red light running, enforcement, safety, driver behavior. No restrictions. This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 161 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-69) TECHNICAL Summary Technology Transfer and Project Implementation Information INDOT Research TRB Subject Code:51-4 Transportation Safety Law Enforcement January 2003 Publication No.: FHWA/IN/JTRP-2002/12, SPR-2484 Final Report EVALUATION OF SAFETY ENFORCEMENT ON CHANGING DRIVER BEHAVIOR – RUNS ON RED (A Two-Volume Report) Introduction Twenty-two percent of crashes at urban the frequency of red light running. The second signalized intersections are claimed to be caused research group developed a random selection nationwide by drivers who run red lights. To process, utilizing a cross section of improve safety at signalized intersections, red-light- intersections in Tippecanoe County. Variables running countermeasures have been applied in in the selection process included posted speed, twelve states. Currently, there are no specific number of lanes, presence of turn lanes, and countermeasures in Indiana nor is there an different traffic signal controls, as examples. assessment of the red light running in Indiana. This Randomly established observation times and research project was designed to assess the days were determined. After the conclusion of magnitude of red light running, evaluate selected the first round of studies, the experiment was countermeasures, and, finally, identify driver and repeated introducing different sites, dates, and road characteristics that are associated with excessive times. As a result, over representation patterns red light running in Indiana. of red light running were identified. Both The project consisted of a telephone survey groups then introduced the perceived risk of to assess Indiana drivers’ perception of the presence being stopped for violation of the law. This and seriousness of red light running, observational occurred through the involvement of local studies at a cross section of intersections (in radio, television, and print media. This was Tippecanoe County), the introduction of selected followed by a period of police enforcement at countermeasures, and the measurement of the the selected intersections. In the case of the effectiveness of the measures. In parallel, an intersection with continuous traffic monitoring, analysis of Indiana crash data was conducted to police enforcement was present during the red- determine the extent of red light running as reported light-running campaign and four months later, by the investigating officers. Finally, the legal signs were installed at approaches to the aspects of a red light running law were researched intersections, advising drivers that photo both as it relates to Indiana and the experience of monitoring of red light running was taking other states. place at that intersection. The reduction in red The observational studies included two light running was investigated. Both the groups different approaches. One group of researchers measured the immediate and residual effects of focused on one intersection, using continuous the higher enforcement periods. video monitoring over extended period to measure Findings Indiana crash statistics for 1997-1999 urban areas. Fifty percent of all fatal crashes at indicates that 22 percent of signalized these intersections were caused by red light intersection crashes are caused by red light runners. Red light running is perceived by two- running supporting the national average for thirds of the survey respondents as a problem in 51-4 01/03 JTRP-2002/12 INDOT Division of Research West Lafayette, IN 47906 Indiana. Ninety-five percent of the respondents the road concurs with the past research findings indicated that they observed people running a that young drivers are more aggressive and red light in Indiana. Seventy-six percent of the violate traffic rules more frequently than other respondents believed that a prime factor is drivers. drivers in a hurry, with 35 percent indicating The randomly selected sites measured driver inattention as a factor. Support for not only frequency of red light running but also increased fines and enforcement was expressed captured the offending driver’s gender, estimated by a clear majority. Seventy-eight percent of the age group of driver, type of vehicle, the presence respondents supported or strongly supported of other occupants, and the type of driving photo enforcement. maneuver at the time of the red light violation This research used two measures of red (left, straight, or right hand turn). This data were light running intensity: frequency and rate. The contrasted against posted speed limit, roadway red light running frequency is a useful measure type, intersection design, and signal light for planning effective enforcement while the red configuration. From the initial round of light running rate is useful in investigating driver sampling, over represented times of day and behavior because the exposure effect days of week were identified. Subsequent (combination of frequency of red signals and sampling rounds also further validated these volume) is removed. At the video-monitored trends. From the full set of results, no type of intersection, the rate and frequency of red signal vehicle (such as SUVs, cars, pickup trucks, etc.) violations were detected and recorded prior to, are over represented nor does race appear to be a during, and after police enforcement. A police factor. Gender, however, is a factor. Male patrol was present and ticketed violators for five drivers committed 64 percent of the red light days during the afternoon peak hours. The red running violations observed, while other studies light running rate did not change significantly (Indiana Annual State Wide Seatbelt Surveys) during the one-week enforcement but decreased have shown male drivers representing 52.7 by 75 percent the next week following the percent of the drivers in 2000, and 53.1 percent enforcement period. One month later, the red in 2001. Results also
Recommended publications
  • SPR-550: the Impact of Red Light Cameras (Automated Enforcement)
    The Impact of Red Light Cameras (Automated Enforcement) on Safety in Arizona Final Report 550 Prepared by: Dr. Simon Washington and Mr. Kangwon Shin 2004 E 5th St Tucson, AZ 85719 June 2005 Prepared for: Arizona Department of Transportation 206 South 17th Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85007 in cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration The contents of the report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Arizona Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Trade or manufacturers’ names which may appear herein are cited only because they are considered essential to the objectives of the report. The U.S. Government and the State of Arizona do not endorse products or manufacturers. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-AZ-05-550 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date The Impact of Red Light Cameras (Automated Enforcement) on August 2005 Safety in Arizona 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors 8. Performing Organization Report No. Dr. Simon Washington and Mr. Kangwon Shin 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Dr. Simon Washington and Mr. Kangwon Shin University of Arizona 11. Contract or Grant No. Tucson, AZ 85721 SPR-PL-1-(61) 550 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13.Type of Report & Period Covered ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 206 S.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Tips & More
    #thankatrucker T Trusted IN THE R Responsible Safety Zone™ A Awesome Dedicated to Truck Driver Safety Awareness and Wellness JUNE 2020 n VOLUME 13 n ISSUE NO. 3 N Necessary D Dedicated S Safe R Road Warriors Congratulations to Douglas King, F Frontline Heroes I Indispensable TransForce Driver of the Year! O On the Road for Us V Vital n exceptional driver and an employee that all companies would like to have when it comes to R Respected E Efficient “A his work ethics!” Those words were used by our customer, Fourteenth Avenue Cartage to describe Douglas C Conscientious R Reliable King, our Driver of the Year, who we are proud to feature in this issue of In the Safety Zone.™ E Essential S Selfless Winning the Driver of the Year Award here at TransForce is a big deal. Pitted against thousands of drivers, the competition is fierce. Doug has been with TransForce since 2002 and has been working with Fourteenth TransForce Driver Avenue Cartage since 2005. During Referral Program! those years, he has rarely missed a day and has been accident free. What TransForce needs more good drivers a remarkable achievement. When From left to right: David Broome (President and to fill local, regional and OTR openings. asked what his key to success was, CEO, TransForce Group), Paul Braswell (VP, Field he says he just follows the rules, tries Operations and Recruiting), Doug King (Driver of to stay safe and do everything right. the Year), Kimberly Castagnetta (EVP Marketing and Division President Compliance and Safety), We should all follow his lead.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Light Camera Ticket California
    Red Light Camera Ticket California Assorted Alfonse speans dazedly and asleep, she rackets her ephemerons twitch regularly. Darien never trend any Karamanlis rush assuredly, is Scarface determinable and flappy enough? Unperceivable and castled Chet assembled almost uxorially, though Norman mythicizes his poisoners exceed. If the image used to issue you the citation is not clear at all or is questionable, this evidence may have to be dismissed, invalidating the case against you. The drivers think he only one of red light camera ticket in crashes associated with varying success, depending on a regulated activity, implementing and solana beach. GC Services in Los Angeles County. Let us a red? Kyrychenko developed from yellow and local businesses that use camera and california red light camera ticket is backing off. The ticket without having your identity of tickets throughout california cities getting a rlc there? Are not available to leading cause of your defense can easily locate your driving, when you are! Provided for any earlier this also be flagged by california red? The camera enforcement camera program. For anyone seeking legal counsel. You run red flag with little revenue are agreeing to california red flex, but what can. Farmer of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Any case results presented on the guide are based upon the facts of a rifle case and do not represent the promise or guarantee. For a friend, this question or is reviewed by police department confirms, depending on commonly get quite expensive is not practice of map provided. However, several are young few measures you our take would reduce the fabric of being forced to late to impose fine.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Law Enforcement: a Review of the Literature
    MONASH UNIVERSITY TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENT: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE by Dominic Zaal April 1994 Report No. 53 This project was undertaken by Dominic Zaal of the Federal Office of Road Safety, Department of Transport while on secondment to the Monash University Accident Research Centre. The research was carried out during an overseas consignment for the Institute of Road Safety Research (SWOV), Leidschendam, The Netherlands. ACCIDENT RESEARCH CENTRE MONASH UNIVERSITY ACCIDENT RESEARCH CENTRE REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Report No. Date ISBN Pages 53 April 1994 0 7326 0052 9 212 Title and sub-title: Traffic Law Enforcement: A review of the literature Author(s): Zaal, D Sponsoring Organisation(s): Institute for Road Safety Research (SWOV) PO Box 170 2260 AD Leidschendam The Netherlands Abstract: A study was undertaken to review the recent Australian and international literature relating to traffic law enforcement. The specific areas examined included alcohol, speed, seat belts and signalised intersections. The review documents the types of traffic enforcement methods and the range of options available to policing authorities to increase the overall efficiency (in terms of cost and human resources) and effectiveness of enforcement operations. The review examines many of the issues related to traffic law enforcement including the deterrence mechanism, the effectiveness of legislation and the type of legal sanctions administered to traffic offenders. The need to use enforcement in conjunction with educational and environmental/engineering strategies is also stressed. The use of educational programs and measures targeted at modifying the physical and social environment is also briefly reviewed. The review highlights the importance of developing enforcement strategies designed to maximise deterrence whilst increasing both the perceived and actual probability of apprehension.
    [Show full text]
  • Frustration, Aggression & Road Rage
    Always remember that the primary goal in defensive driving is to stay safe and live to drive another day. Frustration, Aggression The context in which frustration occurs Other road users are probably equally and Road Rage can determine both the nature and extent frustrated in traffic, perhaps more so. of our own resulting aggressive behavior. They may not be as prepared for traffic. There are also differences in people’s nat- Frustration occurs when someone or Be courteous and forgiving. Your ural propensities. Some drivers are something impedes your progress toward behavior may serve to reduce their content to mutter curses to themselves a goal. In the driving environment our goal levels of frustration and consequently while others are provoked to physical is to get to our destination as quickly and their levels of aggression and violence. Both personal attributes and as safely as possible. When other road risk-taking, thereby making the traffic situational factors can moderate our users interfere with our progress we environment safer for everyone, aggressive responses. become frustrated. In the driving environ- including you. ment, increases in aggression can have Some experts distinguish between Do not fret over people, conditions and deadly consequences. Frustration can aggressive driving and road rage. things that you cannot control. Choose lead to any or all of the following Aggressive driving is instrumental, that is, your battles wisely and save your aggressive behaviour: it serves to further progress toward a energy and emotions for situations that desired outcome when we are frustrated. Excessive speeding or street racing you can influence.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Solana Beach) To: Citation Processing Center, P
    CITATION / TICKET INFORMATION (page 1 of 2) GENERAL INFORMATION: You may obtain more information regarding a citation by calling 1-800-989-2058. The City’s parking regulations are outlined under Title 10, Chapters 10.28 and 10.32 of the Municipal Code. The Municipal Code is available at City Hall for public viewing or can be accessed online at www.cityofsolanabeach.org PAYMENTS: Payment for tickets is not accepted at City Hall. Citations should be paid by mail, sending the proper penalty amount in Money Order or Check (payable to the City of Solana Beach) to: Citation Processing Center, P. O. Box 2730, Huntington Beach, CA 92647-2730. Please do not send cash. Enclose the notice of parking violation with your payment and/or proof of correction. Payment by credit card may be made online at www.citationprocessingcenter.com or by calling 1-800-989-2058. APPEALS or REQUESTS FOR REVIEW: Appeals are not accepted at City Hall. All citation appeals are handled in writing, with a written explanation and request for administrative review sent to: Citation Processing Center, P.O. Box 2730, Huntington Beach, CA 92647-2730. TICKET Corrections / Sign-Off: - Correctable Violations (Registration, License Plates) may be corrected by the City’s Code Compliance Officer (858- 720-2412) or San Diego County Sheriff’s Department. - Disabled Person Parking Placard: This is no longer a correctable offense, therefore sign-offs can no longer be issued by the issuing officer. You may elect to send copies of documents to the ticket vendor (DataTicket, information on back of tickets) for their consideration of waiving the ticket.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Red Light Violation Data Collected from Intersections Equipped with Red Light Photo Enforcement Cameras
    DOT HS 810 580 March 2006 Analysis of Red Light Violation Data Collected from Intersections Equipped with Red Light Photo Enforcement Cameras Research and Innovative Technology Administration Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, MA 02142-1093 This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. ii Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average one hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED March 2006 Project Memorandum October 2003 – October 2005 shes 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Analysis of Red Light Violation Data Collected from Intersections Equipped with Red Light Photo Enforcement Cameras PPA # HS-19 6. AUTHOR(S) C. Y. David Yang and Wassim G. Najm . 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8.PERFORMING ORGANIZATION U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Medication Use and Driving Risks by Tammie Lee Demler, BS Pharm, Pharmd
    CONTINUING EDUCATION Medication Use and Driving Risks by Tammie Lee Demler, BS Pharm, PharmD pon successful completion of this ar- the influence of alcohol has Useful Websites ticle, pharmacists should be able to: long been accepted as one 1. Identify the key functional ele- of the most important causes ■ www.dot.gov/ or http://www.dot.gov/ ments that are required to ensure of traffic accidents and driv- odapc/ competent, safe driving. ing fatalities. Driving under Website of the U.S. Department of 2. Identify the side effects associated with pre- the influence of alcohol has Transportation, which contains trends Uscription, over-the-counter and herbal medi- been studied not only in ex- and law updates. It also contains an cations that can pose risks to drivers. perimental research, but also excellent search engine. 3. Describe the potential impact of certain medi- in epidemiological road side ■ www.mayoclinic.com/health/herbal- cation classes on driving competence. studies. The effort that society supplements/SA00044 4. Describe the pharmacist’s duty to warn re- has made to take serious le- Website for the Mayo Clinic, with garding medications that have the potential to gal action against those who information about herbal supplements. impair a patient’s driving competence. choose to drink and drive It offers an expert blog for further exploration about specific therapies and 5. Provide counseling points to support safe driv- has resulted in the significant to receive/share insight about personal ing in all patients who are receiving medication. deterrents of negative social driving impairment with herbal drugs. stigma and incarceration.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Flags Fly on Red-Light Cameras | Watchdog Column | DFW I
    Watchdog: Red flags fly on red-light cameras | Watchdog Column | DFW I... http://www.dallasnews.com/investigations/watchdog/20150122-watchdog... ePaper Subscribe Sign In Home News Business Sports Entertainment Arts & Life Opinion Obits Marketplace DMNstore Communities Crime Education Investigations State Nation/World Politics Videos Photos 92° 7-day Forecast Follow Us Watchdog Watchdog: Red flags fly on red-light cameras Share Tweet Email 38 Comment Print Dave Lieber Watchdog Published: 22 January 2015 11:10 PM Updated: 24 March 2015 12:47 PM I nearly fell out of my chair reading a recent interview with the head of the red-light camera company that provides the flashing contraptions to cities such as Allen, Coppell, Denton, Grand Prairie, Mesquite, Plano, Richardson and University Park. In a column by Holman W. Jenkins Jr. of The Wall Street Journal , here’s the paragraph that stunned me: “As for a universal peeve of motorists, being fined for a harmless rolling right on red, Mr. [Jim] Saunders suggests jurisdictions refrain from issuing a ticket except when a pedestrian is in the crosswalk.” I read that again. The head of Redflex Traffic Systems is urging the hundreds of cities that use his red-light cameras to lighten up on the easiest way these cities make their money: rolling right on red, creeping around the corner when no people or cars are in sight, triggering a white flash of light that costs a $75 civil fine. I didn’t realize the red-light traffic camera industry was in such trouble that the head of one of the dominant companies is urging its customers to be nice.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors That Impact Driving
    LESSON PLAN Factors That Impact Driving NATIONAL HEALTH EDUCATION STANDARDS (NHES) 9-12 Standard 5: Students will analyze the influence of family, peers, culture, media, technology, and other factors on healthy behaviors. • 5.12.2 Determine the value of applying a thoughtful decision-making process in health-related situations. • 5.12.3 Justify when individual or collaborative decision-making is appropriate. • 5.12.4 Generate alternatives to health-related issues or problems. OBJECTIVES Your teen driver education objective is to help students make appropriate driving decisions by first analyzing how various factors impact teen driver safety. Students will achieve this objective by: • Explaining how speed affects teenage driving • Determining the impact of environmental conditions on teenage driving behaviors • Examining the effects of various mental and physical conditions on teenage driving behaviors • Determining the reasons people “take chances” when driving SPEEDING AND DRIVING 1. Have students list different speed limits they encounter while riding or driving in the car. 2. Ask students where they see lower speed limits (residential neighborhoods, etc.) versus where they have seen higher speed limits (highways). 3. Have students discuss the reasons for the variations in speed limits and ask them what might happen if there was just one speed limit, regardless of location. 4. Have students explain the importance of obeying speed limits and the dangers of not obeying speed limits. (cont. on page 2) 1 Do not conduct any activity without adult supervision. This content is provided for informational purposes only. Discovery Education and Toyota assume no liability for your use of the information. Copyright © 2018 Discovery Education.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Rage Factors
    ROAD RAGE FACTORS HOW TO AVOID ROAD RAGE Here are some common factors that often Make sure you have the right car insurance policy to contribute to road rage incidents or aggressive protect yourself from aggressive drivers or if you find driving behavior. yourself the victim of a road rage incident. TRAFFIC DELAYS BEFORE YOU GET BEHIND THE WHEEL o Heavy traffic, sitting at stoplights, looking for a o Don’t rush. Give yourself time to get where you’re parking space or even waiting for passengers going; you’re less likely to become impatient and can increase a driver’s anger level. take unnecessary risks. RUNNING LATE o Cool off. If you’re upset, take time to calm down. o Running behind for a meeting or appointment o Be aware and anticipate. If you expect can cause drivers to be impatient. something to happen you can sometimes resolve the issue before it occurs. ANONYMITY o If drivers feel that they probably won’t see WHAT TO REMEMBER WHEN DRIVING other drivers again, they may feel more o Give other drivers a break. If someone is driving comfortable engaging in risky driving slowly, keep in mind they might be lost. behaviors like tailgating, cutting people off, o Use hand gestures wisely. Keep gestures positive - excessive honking or making rude gestures. say, waving to a driver who lets you in when merging. o If the motoring public report these road o Don’t tailgate. Always keep a safe distance from rage incidents to our SEPI office, disciplinary the car in front, no matter how slowly they might measures could be taken with the employee.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Youan Aggressive Driver?
    Front Panel Back Panel Are YOU an Aggressive Driver? If confronted by an aggressive driver, you should: • Get out of their way as soon as you can safely You are an aggressive driver if you drive in a pushy, bold • Stay calm — reaching your destination safely is your goal or selfish manner, which puts yourself and others at risk. • Do not challenge him or her • Aggressive driving is a contributing factor in nearly half of all • Avoid eye contact crashes in Idaho. • Up to three-fourths of all aggressive-driving crashes occur in • Ignore gestures and don’t return them urban areas. • Always buckle up in case abrupt movements cause you to lose • More than four out of five fatal aggressive-driver crashes that control of your vehicle involved a single vehicle occurred in rural areas. • Young drivers, ages 19 and younger, are over 4 times as likely to be Can I report an Aggressive Driver or Road Rage incident? involved in an aggressive-driving crash than all other drivers. Citizens have the right to report an aggressive-driving or road- rage incident to law enforcement if it is witnessed in the absence of an officer. The following behaviors are considered aggressive driving: The following is the type of information you will need to (Numbers 1-8 are considered traffic violations) provide, if safely possible: 1. Failing to obey traffic-control devices, such as stop/yield/speed 1. Find a safe place to call 911, or call dispatch when you get home. limit signs, traffic signals and roadway markings 2.
    [Show full text]