DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. Wind Industry Fourth Quarter 2011 Market Report January 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

U.S. Wind Industry Fourth Quarter 2011 Market Report January 2012 The U.S. wind industry installed 3,444 MW during the fourth quarter of 2011, bringing total installations in 2011 to 6,810 MW. The U.S. wind industry now totals 46,919 MW through the end of 2011. There are over 8,300 MW currently under construction involving over 100 separate projects spanning 31 states plus Puerto Rico. U.S. Annual and Cumulative Wind Power Capacity The U.S. wind industry installed 6,810 MW during 2011, a 31% increase from 2010 total installations. These projects were installed across thirty U.S. states, using twenty-three different turbine manufacturers. The fourth quarter alone saw 3,444 MW commissioned – more than the first three quarters of the year combined. The cumulative installed wind capacity in the U.S. grew 17% from 2010, and now totals 46,919 MW. *** AWEA Fourth Quarter 2011 Market Report *** U.S. Wind Power Installations by Quarter 4,500 4,106 4,116 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 4,000 3,444 3,500 3,296 3,080 3,000 2,500 2,000 Capacity Capacity (MW 1,621 1,585 1,500 1,294 1,331 1,219 1,204 1,118 1,044 1,000 704 671 541 500 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 *** AWEA Fourth Quarter 2011 Market Report *** Wind Power Capacity Installations, Top 20 States Texas Iowa California Through 2010 1Q 2011 Illinois 2Q 2011 Minnesota 3Q 2011 Washington 4Q 2011 Oregon Oklahoma Most Capacity Installed during Capacity Colorado 2011 (MW) North Dakota California 921.3 Wyoming Illinois 692.5 New York Iowa 646.7 Minnesota 541.9 Indiana Oklahoma 525.0 Kansas Pennsylvania Fastest Growing States during 3Q 2011 Growth Rate South Dakota Ohio 929% Vermont 625% New Mexico Massachusetts 152% Wisconsin Michigan 130% Idaho Idaho 75% West Virginia 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 *** AWEA Fourth Quarter 2011 Market Report *** U.S. Wind Power Installations by State *** AWEA Fourth Quarter 2011 Market Report *** U.S. Wind Power Capacity under Construction 10,000 Over 100 wind projects are currently under construction across 31 9,000 states and Puerto Rico. Almost 3,500 MWs of new projects broke ground during 4Q 2011 and the year ended with 8,320 MWs under 8,000 construction. 7,000 6,000 5,000 Capacity Capacity (MW) 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 1Q08 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 1Q09 2Q09 3Q09 4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11 New Construction Started in Quarter All Under Construction in Quarter Completed Capacity in Quarter *** AWEA Fourth Quarter 2011 Market Report *** Regional Installation & Construction Trends *** AWEA Fourth Quarter 2011 Market Report *** Projects Online First Quarter 2011 Project Number Turbine Turbine State Project Name Capacity of Wind Rating Project Developer Project Owner Power Purchaser Manufacturer (MW) Turbines (MW) Tehachapi 1.6 Proto- CA 1.6 1 1.6 GE Energy GE Energy GE Energy Type HI Kahuku Wind 30.0 12 2.5 Clipper First Wind First Wind HECO Idaho Wind Partners Exergy Development Group / ID 118.5 79 1.5 GE Energy Idaho Wind Partners 1, LLC Idaho Power 1 (11 farms - 2011) Reunion Power IL Big Sky Wind Facility 239.4 114 2.1 Suzlon Midwest Wind Energy Edison Mission Group Merchant MN Adams 19.8 12 1.7 Alstom Juhl Wind Juhl Wind Xcel Energy Alliant Energy Wind Capital Group/Alliant Alliant Energy (Wisconsin MN Bent Tree 201.3 122 1.7 Vestas (Wisconsin Power & Energy Power & Light) Light) MN Danielson Wind 19.8 12 1.7 Alstom Juhl Wind Juhl Wind Xcel Energy Indianapolis Power MN Lakefield (phase I) 52.5 35 1.5 GE Energy enXco enXco & Light Associated Electric Lost Creek Ridge MO 1.5 1 1.5 GE Energy Wind Capital Group Wind Capital Group Cooperative Inc. Wind Farm (2011) (AECI) NE Laredo Ridge 81.0 54 1.5 GE Energy Midwest Wind Energy Edison Mission Group NPPD NY Hardscrabble 74.0 37 2.0 Gamesa Iberdrola Renewables Iberdrola Renewables Merchant PPL Renewable Energy, LLC PA Frey Farm 3.2 2 1.6 GE Energy and Lancaster County Solid PPL Renewable Energy Turkey Hill Dairy Waste Management Authority PrairieWinds SD 1 PrairieWinds SD 1 (Subsidiary (Subsidiary of Basin SD Crow Lake (2011) 64.5 43 1.5 GE Energy Basin Electric Power of Basin Electric) Electric), 63 MW/ Mitchell Technical Institute 1.5 MW Crow Lake (2011) - PrairieWinds SD 1 (Subsidiary SD 10.5 7 1.5 GE Energy South Dakota Wind Partners Basin Electric Power Community Owned of Basin Electric) TX Loraine II 49.5 33 1.5 GE Energy Third Planet Windpower Third Planet Windpower Merchant WA Juniper Canyon 151.2 63 2.4 Mitsubishi Iberdrola Renewables Iberdrola Renewables Merchant *** AWEA Fourth Quarter 2011 Market Report *** Projects Online Second Quarter 2011 Project Number Turbine Turbine State Project Name Capacity of Wind Rating Project Developer Project Owner Power Purchaser Manufacturer (MW) Turbines (MW) Southern California CA Alta III 150.0 50 3.0 Vestas Terra-Gen Power Terra-Gen Power Edison Southern California CA Alta IV 102.0 34 3.0 Vestas Terra-Gen Power Terra-Gen Power Edison Southern California CA Alta V 168.0 56 3.0 Vestas Terra-Gen Power Terra-Gen Power Edison White Oak Energy IL 150.0 100 1.5 GE Energy Invenergy Invenergy TVA Center Berkshire Wind Berkshire Wind Berkshire Wind Power Berkshire Wind Power MA 15.0 10 1.5 GE Energy Power Cooperative Power Project Cooperative Corporation Cooperative Corporation Corporation Ipswich Municipal Light Department; MA Ipswich 1.6 1 1.6 GE Energy Town of Ipswich Town of Ipswich Ipswich Public Schools Mount Wachusett Mount Wachusett Mount Wachusett MA 3.3 2 1.65 Vestas Community College Community College Community College Community College Delmarva Power (80%), U. of D and MD Roth Rock 50.0 20 2.5 Nordex Synergics Gestamp State General Service Department (20%) Southwest Wind Consulting, Community Energy Community Wind MN 30.0 12 2.5 Clipper Developers Board, Lincoln Edison Mission Group Xcel Energy North County Enterprise Development *** AWEA Fourth Quarter 2011 Market Report *** Projects Online Second Quarter 2011 Project Number Turbine Turbine State Project Name Capacity of Wind Rating Project Developer Project Owner Power Purchaser Manufacturer (MW) Turbines (MW) University of University of University of Minnesota - University of Minnesota - Minnesota - Morris; MN Minnesota Morris II - 1.65 1 1.65 Vestas Morris Morris excess to Otter Tail PES Power MN Winona County Wind 1.5 2 0.75 Unison Juhl Wind Juhl Wind Xcel Energy OH Lincoln Electric 2.5 1 2.5 Kenersys Lincoln Electric Lincoln Electric Lincoln Electric EDP Renewables North EDP Renewables North OH Timber Road II 54.0 30 1.8 Vestas AEP Ohio America LLC America LLC OR Leaning Juniper 2a 90.3 43 2.1 Suzlon Iberdrola Renewables Iberdrola Renewables Merchant OR Leaning Juniper 2b 111.0 74 1.5 GE Energy Iberdrola Renewables Iberdrola Renewables Merchant UT Milford II 102.0 68 1.5 GE Energy First Wind First Wind SCPPA Lubbock Wind TX 5.0 2 2.5 Samsung Cielo Wind Services Lubbock Wind LLC Merchant Ranch Repowers Completed Second Quarter 2011 San Gorgonio Wind Whitewater Energy Southern California CA 6.0 2 3.0 Vestas San Gorgonio Farms Inc. Farm (Re-Power) Corporation Edison *** AWEA Fourth Quarter 2011 Market Report *** Projects Online Third Quarter 2011 Project Number Turbine Turbine State Project Name Capacity of Wind Rating Project Developer Project Owner Power Purchaser Manufacturer (MW) Turbines (MW) Unisource Energy AZ Kingman 10.0† 5 2.0 Gamesa Western Wind Energy Corp. Western Wind Energy Corp. Services 1.6 (GE); GE Energy CO Cedar Creek II 250.8 123 2.5 (63); Nordex BP Wind Energy BP Wind Energy Xcel Energy (Nordex) (60) CO Cedar Point Wind 250.2 139 1.8 Vestas RES Americas Enbridge Xcel Energy MidAmerican IA Pomeroy 29.9 13 2.3 Siemens MidAmerican Energy MidAmerican Energy Energy IA Roeder Farms 1.6 1 1.6 GE Energy 5045 Wind Partners 5045 Wind Partners Alliant Energy IA Wind Walkers 1.6 1 1.6 GE Energy 5045 Wind Partners 5045 Wind Partners Alliant Energy Adams Electric IL Brown County Wind 1.5 1 1.5 VENSYS Adams Electric Cooperative Adams Electric Cooperative Cooperative IL Testa Produce 0.75 1 0.75 Aeronautica Testa Produce Testa Produce Testa Produce Central Maine ME Rollins 60 40 1.5 GE Energy First Wind First Wind Power; Bangor Hydro Electric REpower (9); Northern Heritage Sustainable Consumers Energy MI Stoney Corners III 20.6 10 Varies Heritage Sustainable Energy Power Energy (2012) Systems (1) Indianapolis Power MN Lakefield 153 102 1.5 GE Energy enXco enXco & Light MN Valley View†† 10 5 2.0 Gamesa Juhl Wind Juhl Wind Xcel Energy † Kingman also includes a 0.5 MW solar component, bringing its total capacity to 10.5 MW †† Valley View was briefly online before its transformer was struck by lightning. The project was brought back online during the Fourth Quarter of 2012. *** AWEA Fourth Quarter 2011 Market Report *** Projects Online Third Quarter 2011 Project Number Turbine Turbine State Project Name Capacity of Wind Rating Project Developer Project Owner Power Purchaser Manufacturer (MW) Turbines (MW) Springview II Wind NE 3 2 1.5 VENSYS Bluestem LLC Bluestem LLC NPPD Facility Macho Springs Wind Tucson Electric NM 50.4 28 1.8 Vestas Element Power Element Power Farm I Power EDP Renewables North EDP Renewables North OH Timber Road II 45 25 1.8 Vestas AEP Ohio America LLC America LLC OK Taloga 129.6 54 2.4 Mitsubishi Edison Mission Group Edison Mission Group OG&E Golden Spread Golden Spread Electric Golden Spread TX Panhandle Wind 78.2 34 2.3 Siemens Cielo Wind Services Cooperative Electric Cooperative Ranch TX Ralls Wind Farm 10 5 2.0 Sany Canyon West Ralls Corp.
Recommended publications
  • 2021 ESG Report

    2021 ESG Report

    2021 REPORT Environmental, Social and Governance Our strategy: NextEra About Our 2020-2021 Coronavirus Confronting Building the Environment Social Governance Risks and Conclusion Appendix A letter from Energy’s this report operating awards & (COVID-19) climate world’s leading opportunities our CEO ESG journey portfolio recognitions response change clean energy provider Contents Our strategy: A letter from our CEO .............................................3 NextEra Energy’s ESG journey ......................................................6 About this report .............................................................................7 Our operating portfolio ..................................................................8 2020-2021 awards & recognitions ..............................................10 Coronavirus (COVID-19) response..............................................11 Confronting climate change ........................................................13 Building the world’s leading clean energy provider .................19 Florida Power & Light Company ................................................20 NextEra Energy Resources ........................................................26 Environment ...................................................................................30 Social ..............................................................................................38 Governance ....................................................................................48 Risks and opportunities ...............................................................52
  • Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary

    Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary

    Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state Wind Working Groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of 2007, there were more than 11,500 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 4,000 MW projected in both 2007 and 2008. The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) estimates that the U.S. installed capacity will exceed 16,000 MW by the end of 2007. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. At that time, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Seventeen states now have more than 100 MW installed. We anticipate five to six additional states will join the 100-MW club early in 2008, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the most difficult and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. WPA continues to work with its national, regional, and state partners to communicate the opportunities and benefits of wind energy to a diverse set of stakeholders.
  • The Medicine Bow Wind Energy Project

    The Medicine Bow Wind Energy Project

    The Medicine Bow Wind Energy Project James Bailey Historic Reclamation Projects Bureau of Reclamation 2014 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. i The Medicine Bow Wind Energy Project ....................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Wind Energy: A Historic Context............................................................................................... 3 Enter the Curious Feds ................................................................................................................ 5 The Rise and Fall of Nuclear ...................................................................................................... 7 Energy Crisis: Alternative Sources Revisited ............................................................................. 8 Reclamation’s Early Investigations .......................................................................................... 12 Planning Studies and Project Approval .................................................................................... 15 The Project Gets Underway ...................................................................................................... 20 Project Dedication—and Project Problems .............................................................................
  • Presentation Title Information

    Presentation Title Information

    Wolfe Research 2018 Power & Gas Leaders Conference Jim Robo Chairman and CEO, NextEra Energy October 3, 2018 Cautionary Statements And Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results This presentation includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Actual results could differ materially from such forward-looking statements. The factors that could cause actual results to differ are discussed in the Appendix herein and in NextEra Energy’s and NextEra Energy Partners’ SEC filings. Non-GAAP Financial Information This presentation refers to certain financial measures that were not prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Reconciliations of historical non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in the Appendix herein. 2 NextEra Energy achieved strong financial results in the first half of 2018 NextEra Energy First Half 2018 Results Adjusted EPS(1) • NEE achieved year-over-year growth of ~12% in adjusted EPS • Continued execution on our best-in- class customer value proposition at FPL $4.04 – Regulatory capital employed growth of (2) $3.62 ~13% year-over-year • Outstanding origination success at Energy Resources – Added over 2,600 MW of renewables to backlog • Announced acquisition of Gulf Power, Florida City Gas and the Stanton and Oleander natural gas power plants H1 2017 H1 2018 – Florida City Gas closed in July 2018 – Gulf Power and natural gas plants granted Hart-Scott-Rodino antitrust clearance 1) See Appendix for reconciliation
  • State Attorneys General: Empowering the Clean Energy Future

    State Attorneys General: Empowering the Clean Energy Future

    Copyright © 2019 by the State Energy and Environmental Impact Center. All rights reserved. State Energy and Environmental Impact Center NYU School of Law https://www.law.nyu.edu/centers/state-impact The primary authors of this report are Jessica R. Bell, Clean Energy Attorney at the State Energy and Environmental Impact Center, and Hampden Macbeth, Staff Attorney at the State Energy and Environmental Impact Center. The authors and the Center are grateful for the research contributions of Ryan Levandowski, a student at the Georgetown University Law Center, and Maggie St. Jean, a student at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University. This report does not necessarily reflect the views of NYU School of Law, if any. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 1 Section I. Overview of the Role of Attorney General Activities in Energy Matters ............................................................ 5 Protecting States’ Energy Rights ................................................................................... 5 Background .................................................................................................................... 5 Mutual Accommodation of Federal and State Energy Rights .............................. 6 Defending States’ Rights Against Preemption and Dormant Commerce Clause Claims .......................................................................................... 7 Defending States’ Rights Against Discriminatory Federal
  • Schedule MPS-1 Page 1 of 9

    Schedule MPS-1 Page 1 of 9

    Grain Belt Express Clean Line Additional Information on Qualifications and Experience of Selected Clean Line Management Team Members and Employees Michael Skelly President and CEO Horizon Wind Energy – Chief Development Officer . Built and developed over 2,600 MW of electric projects, including: Blue Canyon V Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Pine Tree Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Rail Splitter Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Rattlesnake Road Wind Farm, Twin Groves II Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Meridian Way I & II Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Lone Star II Wind Farm, Pioneer Prairie I & II Wind Farm, Prairie Star Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Twin Groves I Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Lone Star I Wind Farm, Elkhorn Wind Farm, Maple Ridge I & II Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Wild Horse Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Blue Canyon I & II Wind Farm and Gen Tie, Mill Run Wind Farm, Somerset Wind Farm, Top of Iowa Wind Farm, Madison Wind Farm, Tierras Morenas Wind Farm. Participated in construction supervision, onsite inspections, the review of quality assurance/quality control procedures, the implementation of safety strategies, and resolving logistical issues of wind farms and generation tie lines. Responsible for purchasing equipment from wind turbine manufacturers. Responsible for negotiating EPC contracts for both equipment and construction, hiring construction supervision teams, negotiating balance of plant contracts for the turbine equipment, and performing development activities, including land acquisition, permitting, and turbine siting. Wayne Galli, Ph.D, P.E. Executive Vice President, Transmission and Technical Services NextEra Energy Resources – Director, Transmission Development ▪ Responsible for routing, siting and engineering for approximately 330 miles of new transmission lines, including HVDC lines for the CREZ Transmission Projects in Texas.
  • Power Finance & Risk

    Power Finance & Risk

    VOL. XVI, NO. 15 / April 15, 2013 Exclusive Insight on Power M&A and Project Financing Power Finance & Risk The weekly issue from Power Intelligence www.powerintelligence.com Panda Aims For Second Investment Fund Panda Power Funds is looking to raise a new investment fund of new investors looking to contribute, although further details with a target of $800 million and a hard cap of $1 billion. It is the could not be learned. The institutional investors and funds either second fund the company has raised, after raising $420 million in declined comment or did not respond to inquiries by press time. 2011. “I have a very good feeling they will hit the $800 million,” says a The Dallas-based power fund is talking to potential investors deal watcher, referencing the investor interest in its recent Temple and has been marketing the fund since February. The expected deal (PI, 4/3). investors are likely to be the same ones that contributed to Panda is shooting for a mid-summer close on the fund and the first fund, with some already far along the due diligence is already looking at potential investments to put the capital to process, according to a deal watcher. Those investors included work. The firm is eyeing three shovel-ready projects in PJM. “The the Ohio State Teacher’s Pension Fund, the Indiana Public difference with this second fund is that because Panda is active in Employees’ Retirement Fund, the 3M Pension Fund, Dutch the market, they are in a position to talk to smaller developers that pension fund APG, the Alfred I.
  • Wind Powering America Fy08 Activities Summary

    Wind Powering America Fy08 Activities Summary

    WIND POWERING AMERICA FY08 ACTIVITIES SUMMARY Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY08 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state Wind Working Groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of 2008, there were more than 16,500 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 7,000 MW projected by year end, bringing the U.S. installed capacity to more than 23,000 MW by the end of 2008. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. At that time, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Twenty-two states now have more than 100 MW installed, compared to 17 at the end of 2007. We anticipate that four or five additional states will join the 100-MW club in 2009, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the most difficult and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. Of course, the 20% Wind Energy by 2030 report (developed by AWEA, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and other stakeholders) indicates that 44 states may be in the 100-MW club by 2030, and 33 states will have more than 1,000 MW installed (at the end of 2008, there were six states in that category).
  • Nextera Energy Inc. Revenue Decomposition

    Nextera Energy Inc. Revenue Decomposition

    Krause Fund Research 2 Spring 2021 NextEra Energy, Inc. (NYSE: NEE) Stock Rating: Utilities th April 16 , 2021 HOLD Analysts z Caleb Fitch Jerome Mays Guy Renquist Grant Wambold [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Investment Thesis Target Price: $85.47-$89.85 Drivers of Thesis: Model Prices • Two of NextEra’s largest subsidiaries, Florida Power and Light (FPL) DCF $87.66 and Gulf Power, are set to see large increases in demand for their services DDM $87.85 in 2021 and 2022. FPL and Gulf Power provide public electricity services to Relative PE $29.95 a large majority of the popular vacation destinations in Florida. As the vaccine Price Data rollout continues in the U.S. and the COVID-19 pandemic draws to a close, Current Price $80.94 safety concerns will diminish. As this happens, we expect Americans to 52-week Low $55.66 increase travel and head to NextEra’s rate-regulated service areas. This 52-week High $87.69 expectation is built into our model with combined revenue growth of 13% in $1 2021 and 6.7% in 2022 for both segments. Key Statistics • NextEra Energy Resources (NEER) will grow at an accelerated rate as Market Capitalization $158.76 B more businesses and consumers look for cleaner energy sources and the Shares Outstanding 1.96 B market for electric vehicle infrastructure expands. NEER is the largest EPS (2021E) $2.15 provider of energy sourced from the wind and sun in the World. NEER’s P/E Ratio (TTM) 54.0 attractive generating portfolio will draw in more customers who are looking Forward P/E Ratio 37.1 for electricity sourced from renewables.
  • Perceived Risk and Response to the Wind Turbine Ice Throw

    Perceived Risk and Response to the Wind Turbine Ice Throw

    PERCEIVED RISK AND RESPONSE TO THE WIND TURBINE ICE THROW HAZARD: COMPARING COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDERS AND OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL IN TWO REGIONS OF TEXAS by Greg Klaus, B.S., M.A.G. A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a major in Environmental Geography May 2017 Committee Members: Denise Blanchard-Boehm, Chair Richard Dixon Richard Earl Todd Moore COPYRIGHT by Greg Klaus 2017 FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgment. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, Greg Klaus, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. DEDICATION The author would like to dedicate this dissertation to the men and women who work in the wind energy industry who at times put themselves in harm’s way in order to provide for their families and also supply this great nation with a clean, renewable source of electricity. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to thank his committee chair Dr. Denise Blanchard for all of her support and guidance throughout the dissertation process; as well as thank committee members Dr. Richard Dixon, Dr. Richard Earl, and Dr.
  • 2009 Registration Document

    2009 Registration Document

    2009 REGISTRATION DOCUMENT WorldReginfo - 88364e60-83e1-4e25-beba-ac6c76609afa In this registration document, the terms “EDF Energies Nouvelles” and the “Company” refer to EDF Energies Nouvelles SA. The “Group” refers to the group comprising the Company and all of its subsidiaries. This registration document includes forward-looking statements and information about the objectives of the Group, in particular, relating to its projects in progress. These statements are sometimes identifi ed by the use of the future or conditional tense, as well as terms such as “estimate”, “believe”, “have the objective of”, “intend to”, “expect”, “result in”, “should” and other similar expressions. It should be noted that the realisation of these objectives and forward-looking statements is dependent on the circumstances and facts that arise in the future. The forward-looking statements and information about the objectives may be affected by known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may signifi cantly alter the future results, performance and accomplishments planned or expected by the Company. These factors may include changes in the economic and commercial situation, regulations and the risk factors described in Chapter 4 of the registration document. Investors are invited to read carefully the risk factors included in Chapter 4 of this registration document before making a decision on whether to invest in the Company. The occurrence of one or more of these risks may adversely affect the Group’s business, fi nancial position or results of operations, or on its ability to achieve its objectives. A change in the method used to consolidate wind farms in the United States took place during the fi nancial year ended on 31 December 2009.
  • 2015 Renewable Energy Data Book Acknowledgments

    2015 Renewable Energy Data Book Acknowledgments

    2015 Renewable Energy Data Book Acknowledgments This report was produced by Philipp Beiter and Tian Tian, edited by Mike Meshek, and designed by Alfred Hicks of the U.S. Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). We greatly appreciate the input, review, and support of Assistant Secretary David Friedman, Ookie Ma, Steve Capanna, Paul Basore, Hoyt Battey, Charlie Gay, Susan Hamm, Ian Hamos, Fred Joseck, Benjamin King, Tien Nguyen, Sunita Satyapal, Paul Spitsen, Rich Tusing, Timothy Welch, and Jeff Winick of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), as well as Chad Augustine, Jerry Davis, Judi Deitchel, David Feldman, Ran Fu, Bryan Hannegan, Caley Johnson, Henry Johnston, Eric Lantz, Al LiVecchi, Jeff Logan, David Mooney, Robin Newmark, Gian Porro, and Paul Schwabe of NREL. Notes Capacity data are reported in watts of alternating current (AC) unless indicated otherwise. The primary data represented and synthesized in the 2015 Renewable Energy Data Book come from the publicly available data sources identified on page 122. Front page inset photos (left to right): iStock/754519; iStock/4393369; iStock/354309; iStock/2101722; iStock/2574180; iStock/5080552; Leslie Eudy, NREL 17854; iStock/11265066 Page 2: iStock/721000; page 6: iStock/5751076; page 17: photo from Invenergy LLC, NREL 14369; page 41: iStock/750178; page 53: iStock/ 754519; page 63: iStock/4393369; page 71: iStock/354309; page 77: iStock/2101722; page 83: iStock/2574180; page 87: iStock/5080552; page 91: photo by Leslie Eudy, NREL 17854; page 99: iStock/11265066; page 109: iStock/330791; page 119: iStock/3459287 Key Findings • The overall U.S. energy consumption decreased to 97.7 quadrillion British thermal units (Btu) in 2015—a 0.6% decline from 2014.