Laws of Similarity in Fluid Mechanics 21

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Laws of Similarity in Fluid Mechanics 21 Laws of similarity in fluid mechanics B. Weigand1 & V. Simon2 1Institut für Thermodynamik der Luft- und Raumfahrt (ITLR), Universität Stuttgart, Germany. 2Isringhausen GmbH & Co KG, Lemgo, Germany. Abstract All processes, in nature as well as in technical systems, can be described by fundamental equations—the conservation equations. These equations can be derived using conservation princi- ples and have to be solved for the situation under consideration. This can be done without explicitly investigating the dimensions of the quantities involved. However, an important consideration in all equations used in fluid mechanics and thermodynamics is dimensional homogeneity. One can use the idea of dimensional consistency in order to group variables together into dimensionless parameters which are less numerous than the original variables. This method is known as dimen- sional analysis. This paper starts with a discussion on dimensions and about the pi theorem of Buckingham. This theorem relates the number of quantities with dimensions to the number of dimensionless groups needed to describe a situation. After establishing this basic relationship between quantities with dimensions and dimensionless groups, the conservation equations for processes in fluid mechanics (Cauchy and Navier–Stokes equations, continuity equation, energy equation) are explained. By non-dimensionalizing these equations, certain dimensionless groups appear (e.g. Reynolds number, Froude number, Grashof number, Weber number, Prandtl number). The physical significance and importance of these groups are explained and the simplifications of the underlying equations for large or small dimensionless parameters are described. Finally, some examples for selected processes in nature and engineering are given to illustrate the method. 1 Introduction If we compare a small leaf with a large one, or a child with its parents, we have the feeling that a ‘similarity’ of some sort exists. On the other hand, the leg of a mouse looks quite different from the leg of an elephant and it is hard to imagine that they might be similar in some respect. So the question arises what ‘similarity’means and how it can be expressed mathematically. This question is of great importance for all biological as well as technical systems, and it might be worthwhile to investigate this question here in the present book. WIT Transactions on State of the Art in Science and Engineering, Vol 3, © 2006 WIT Press www.witpress.com, ISSN 1755-8336 (on-line) doi:10.2495/1-84564-001-2/1b Laws of Similarity in Fluid Mechanics 21 In daily life, we are used to thinking in terms of dimensions and to measuring them using a clock or a metre stick. For example, we think of a mouse as an animal that is about 7 cm in length with legs that are relatively small. One might ask, what we mean by ‘relatively small’, and we might answer that the legs of a mouse are relatively small compared with the size of our own legs. This clearly shows that it is meaningless to state that a certain length is small or large. One must always compare one length with another. If we compare one length with another, which is a part of the same problem (e.g. the height or length of the animal), then we obtain a dimensionless quantity. With this dimensionless quantity we can scale the problem, leading to geometric similarity. Geometric similarity was already known to the ancient Greek mathematicians in connection with geometrical problems, as has been noted by Galileo in 1638 [1]. If additional quantities like time or mass are present in the problem, dimensional analysis can be used to obtain a set of dimensionless groups that completely determine the problem. If all these dimensionless groups are set to be constant, one obtains full similarity between two processes, even though the ‘real’ dimensional quantities like length and weight are different. In 1914, Buckingham [2] stated a basic theorem (Buckingham or pi theorem) which showed that every equation that is written in terms of dimensional variables can be converted into an equation that is governed only by dimensionless quantities, and, most important, that the number of dimensionless quantities is lower than the number of dimensional quantities. In other words, dimensional analysis is a means to reduce the number of independent variables and therefore reduces the effort to find a solution to a given problem. Lord Rayleigh [3] developed a systematic method for manipulating the exponents of the various dimensional entities to yield dimensionless groups. Nowadays, similarity and dimensional methods are used in numerous engineering problems (e.g. in hydrodynamics [4], heat transfer [5], magnetohydro- dynamics [6] and meteorology [7] among others). General discussions of the method and many interesting applications can be found in [8–12]. Similarity and dimensional analyses have also been used in biology and for a more detailed discussion the reader is referred to the paper by Stahl [13]. In the present paper, we first explain the basics of dimensional analysis. The method is explained by solving a simple example to show its ease of use. Then, we introduce some well-known dimensionless groups. These dimensionless groups describe the magnitude of certain physical processes that are important in fluid flow. Finally, some examples of similarity in nature and engineering are given, demonstrating the benefits of the method. 2 Dimensional analysis Dimensional analysis is a powerful method, which can be used in all physical applications. The method is based on the fact that all physical quantities have units, which can be split into ‘basic’ or ‘primary’ units and ‘secondary’ units. The basic units are characterized by the fact that they are independent of each other. A basic unit cannot be constructed from a combination of other basic units. It is customary to use the International System of dimensions, the SI system, with the units given in Table 1 as basic units. However, it is possible to use other basic units than those of the SI system. Beside the basic units given in Table 1, there are derived or secondary units. Velocity, for example, is the unit length L divided by time τ. This can be denoted by [Lτ −1], whereas density is the unit mass M divided by length cubed L3, which can be written as [ML−3]. Table 2 shows a list of important secondary quantities in fluid mechanics. In general, one can say that for any problem there is always the task to express a physical quantity p1 as a function of other physical quantities p2, p3, ..., pn, where n is the number of WIT Transactions on State of the Art in Science and Engineering, Vol 3, © 2006 WIT Press www.witpress.com, ISSN 1755-8336 (on-line) 22 Flow Phenomena in Nature Table 1: Basic quantities, their dimensions and units, given in the SI system. Basic unit Dimension SI unit Length L m (metre) Mass M kg (kilogram) Temperature ϑ K (kelvin) Time τ s (second) Species amount N mol (mole) Electric current I A (ampere) Luminous intensity S cd (candela) Table 2: Some often used physical quantities with their dimensions. Physical quantity Symbol Dimension −1 Velocity of sound as Lτ Acceleration a Lτ −2 Angular velocity ωτ−1 Diffusion coefficient D L2τ −1 Density ρ ML−3 Dynamic viscosity η ML−1τ −1 Energy E J = ML2τ −2 Frequency f τ −1 Force F N = MLτ −2 Heat capacity C L2τ −2ϑ−1 Heat transfer coefficient h Mτ −3ϑ−1 Kinematic viscosity ν L2τ −1 Power P W = ML2τ −3 Pressure p Pa = ML−1τ −2 Momentum I MLτ −1 Resistance force W N = MLτ −2 Surface tension σ Mτ −2 −1 −2 Shear stress τ jk ML τ Thermal conductivity k MLτ −3ϑ−1 Thermal diffusivity α L2τ −1 Velocity U, V, W Lτ −1 physical variables needed to describe the problem under consideration ([9, 11, 12]). This means that a relation of the form f ( p1, p2, ..., pn) = 0 (1) WIT Transactions on State of the Art in Science and Engineering, Vol 3, © 2006 WIT Press www.witpress.com, ISSN 1755-8336 (on-line) Laws of Similarity in Fluid Mechanics 23 will always exist. Each of the physical variables pj has dimensions that can be constructed from the basic units given above. The dimension of the variable pj, denoted by pj , is then given by m aij pj = (Xi) . (2) i=1 In this equation Xi denotes one of the basic units powered by the exponent aij, m is the number of basic units involved and the index j can vary from 1 to n. For example, the dimension of the physical quantity ‘velocity’ is −1 [U] = p1 = L τ , X1 = L, X2 = τ, a11 = 1, a21 =−1. (3) Since every physical process must be independent of the arbitrary units used, the relation given by eqn (1) can be reduced to a relationship between dimensionless quantities j, so that f ( 1, 2, ..., d) = 0, (4) where d is the number of the dimensionless products. These dimensionless quantities are pro- ducts of the physical quantities, which means n bj = pj , (5) j=1 with the dimension n bj [ ] = 1 = [pj] . (6) j=1 Inserting eqn (2) into eqn (6) leads to n m aijbj [ ] = 1 = (Xi) . (7) j=1 i=1 In eqn (7) the coefficients aij are known and the exponents bj have to be determined such that the equation is satisfied. This is always possible if the system of equations n aijbj = 0 (8) j=1 has non-trivial solutions for the n unknown coefficients bj. The coefficient matrix aij is also known as the dimension matrix. The equivalence between eqns (1) and (4) is known in the literature as the ‘Buckingham theorem’ or ‘pi theorem’. The reader is referred to the work by Görtler [9] or Spurk [11] for a more detailed discussion of this topic.This theorem also gives a relation between the number of physical variables involved, n, and the number of independent dimensionless groups, d, according to d = n − r, (9) where r is the rank of the dimension matrix.
Recommended publications
  • Convection Heat Transfer
    Convection Heat Transfer Heat transfer from a solid to the surrounding fluid Consider fluid motion Recall flow of water in a pipe Thermal Boundary Layer • A temperature profile similar to velocity profile. Temperature of pipe surface is kept constant. At the end of the thermal entry region, the boundary layer extends to the center of the pipe. Therefore, two boundary layers: hydrodynamic boundary layer and a thermal boundary layer. Analytical treatment is beyond the scope of this course. Instead we will use an empirical approach. Drawback of empirical approach: need to collect large amount of data. Reynolds Number: Nusselt Number: it is the dimensionless form of convective heat transfer coefficient. Consider a layer of fluid as shown If the fluid is stationary, then And Dividing Replacing l with a more general term for dimension, called the characteristic dimension, dc, we get hd N ≡ c Nu k Nusselt number is the enhancement in the rate of heat transfer caused by convection over the conduction mode. If NNu =1, then there is no improvement of heat transfer by convection over conduction. On the other hand, if NNu =10, then rate of convective heat transfer is 10 times the rate of heat transfer if the fluid was stagnant. Prandtl Number: It describes the thickness of the hydrodynamic boundary layer compared with the thermal boundary layer. It is the ratio between the molecular diffusivity of momentum to the molecular diffusivity of heat. kinematic viscosity υ N == Pr thermal diffusivity α μcp N = Pr k If NPr =1 then the thickness of the hydrodynamic and thermal boundary layers will be the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Che 253M Experiment No. 2 COMPRESSIBLE GAS FLOW
    Rev. 8/15 AD/GW ChE 253M Experiment No. 2 COMPRESSIBLE GAS FLOW The objective of this experiment is to familiarize the student with methods for measurement of compressible gas flow and to study gas flow under subsonic and supersonic flow conditions. The experiment is divided into three distinct parts: (1) Calibration and determination of the critical pressure ratio for a critical flow nozzle under supersonic flow conditions (2) Calculation of the discharge coefficient and Reynolds number for an orifice under subsonic (non- choked) flow conditions and (3) Determination of the orifice constants and mass discharge from a pressurized tank in a dynamic bleed down experiment under (choked) flow conditions. The experimental set up consists of a 100 psig air source branched into two manifolds: the first used for parts (1) and (2) and the second for part (3). The first manifold contains a critical flow nozzle, a NIST-calibrated in-line digital mass flow meter, and an orifice meter, all connected in series with copper piping. The second manifold contains a strain-gauge pressure transducer and a stainless steel tank, which can be pressurized and subsequently bled via a number of attached orifices. A number of NIST-calibrated digital hand held manometers are also used for measuring pressure in all 3 parts of this experiment. Assorted pressure regulators, manual valves, and pressure gauges are present on both manifolds and you are expected to familiarize yourself with the process flow, and know how to operate them to carry out the experiment. A process flow diagram plus handouts outlining the theory of operation of these devices are attached.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerodynamics Material - Taylor & Francis
    CopyrightAerodynamics material - Taylor & Francis ______________________________________________________________________ 257 Aerodynamics Symbol List Symbol Definition Units a speed of sound ⁄ a speed of sound at sea level ⁄ A area aspect ratio ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ b wing span c chord length c Copyrightmean aerodynamic material chord- Taylor & Francis specific heat at constant pressure of air · root chord tip chord specific heat at constant volume of air · / quarter chord total drag coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ , induced drag coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ , parasite drag coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ , wave drag coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ local skin friction coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ lift coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ , compressible lift coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ compressible moment ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ , coefficient , pitching moment coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ , rolling moment coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ , yawing moment coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ ______________________________________________________________________ 258 Aerodynamics Aerodynamics Symbol List (cont.) Symbol Definition Units pressure coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ compressible pressure ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ , coefficient , critical pressure coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ , supersonic pressure coefficient ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ D total drag induced drag Copyright material - Taylor & Francis parasite drag e span efficiency factor ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ L lift pitching moment · rolling moment · yawing moment · M mach number ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ critical mach number ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ free stream mach number ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ P static pressure ⁄ total pressure ⁄ free stream pressure ⁄ q dynamic pressure ⁄ R
    [Show full text]
  • A Semi-Hydrostatic Theory of Gravity-Dominated Compressible Flow
    Generated using version 3.2 of the official AMS LATEX template 1 A semi-hydrostatic theory of gravity-dominated compressible flow 2 Thomas Dubos ∗ IPSL-Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France Fabrice voitus CNRM-Groupe d’étude de l’Atmosphere Metéorologique, Météo-France, Toulouse, France ∗Corresponding author address: Thomas Dubos, LMD, École Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France. E-mail: [email protected] 1 3 Abstract 4 From Hamilton’s least action principle, compressible equations of motion with density diag- 5 nosed from potential temperature through hydrostatic balance are derived. Slaving density 6 to potential temperature suppresses the degrees of freedom supporting the propagation of 7 acoustic waves and results in a sound-proof system. The linear normal modes and dispersion 8 relationship for an isothermal state of rest on f- and β- planes are accurate from hydrostatic 9 to non-hydrostatic scales, except for deep internal gravity waves. Especially the Lamb wave 10 and long Rossby waves are not distorted, unlike with anelastic or pseudo-incompressible 11 systems. 12 Compared to similar equations derived by Arakawa and Konor (2009), the semi-hydrostatic 13 system derived here possesses an additional term in the horizontal momentum budget. This 14 term is an apparent force resulting from the vertical coordinate not being the actual height 15 of an air parcel, but its hydrostatic height, i.e. the hypothetical height it would have after 16 the atmospheric column it belongs to has reached hydrostatic balance through adiabatic 17 vertical displacements of air parcels. The Lagrange multiplier λ introduced in Hamilton’s 18 principle to slave density to potential temperature is identified as the non-hydrostatic ver- 19 tical displacement, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Heat Transfer in Turbulent Rayleigh-B\'Enard Convection Within Two Immiscible Fluid Layers
    This draft was prepared using the LaTeX style file belonging to the Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1 Heat transfer in turbulent Rayleigh-B´enard convection within two immiscible fluid layers Hao-Ran Liu1, Kai Leong Chong2,1, , Rui Yang1, Roberto Verzicco3,4,1 and Detlef† Lohse1,5, ‡ 1Physics of Fluids Group and Max Planck Center Twente for Complex Fluid Dynamics, MESA+Institute and J. M. Burgers Centre for Fluid Dynamics, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500AE Enschede, The Netherlands 2Shanghai Key Laboratory of Mechanics in Energy Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, School of Mechanics and Engineering Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200072, PR China 3Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Via del Politecnico 1, Roma 00133, Italy 4Gran Sasso Science Institute - Viale F. Crispi, 7 67100 L’Aquila, Italy 5Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Am Fassberg 17, 37077 G¨ottingen, Germany (Received xx; revised xx; accepted xx) We numerically investigate turbulent Rayleigh-B´enard convection within two immiscible fluid layers, aiming to understand how the layer thickness and fluid properties affect the heat transfer (characterized by the Nusselt number Nu) in two-layer systems. Both two- and three-dimensional simulations are performed at fixed global Rayleigh number Ra = 108, Prandtl number Pr =4.38, and Weber number We = 5. We vary the relative thickness of the upper layer between 0.01 6 α 6 0.99 and the thermal conductivity coefficient ratio of the two liquids between 0.1 6 λk 6 10. Two flow regimes are observed: In the first regime at 0.04 6 α 6 0.96, convective flows appear in both layers and Nu is not sensitive to α.
    [Show full text]
  • Heat Transfer by Impingement of Circular Free-Surface Liquid Jets
    18th National & 7th ISHMT-ASME Heat and Mass Transfer Conference January 4-6, 2006 Paper No: IIT Guwahati, India Heat Transfer by Impingement of Circular Free-Surface Liquid Jets John H. Lienhard V Department of Mechanical Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA 02139-4307 USA email: [email protected] Abstract Q volume flow rate of jet (m3/s). 3 Qs volume flow rate of splattered liquid (m /s). 2 This paper reviews several aspects of liquid jet im- qw wall heat flux (W/m ). pingement cooling, focusing on research done in our r radius coordinate in spherical coordinates, or lab at MIT. Free surface, circular liquid jet are con- radius coordinate in cylindrical coordinates (m). sidered. Theoretical and experimental results for rh radius at which turbulence is fully developed the laminar stagnation zone are summarized. Tur- (m). bulence effects are discussed, including correlations ro radius at which viscous boundary layer reaches for the stagnation zone Nusselt number. Analyti- free surface (m). cal results for downstream heat transfer in laminar rt radius at which turbulent transition begins (m). jet impingement are discussed. Splattering of turbu- r1 radius at which thermal boundary layer reaches lent jets is also considered, including experimental re- free surface (m). sults for the splattered mass fraction, measurements Red Reynolds number of circular jet, uf d/ν. of the surface roughness of turbulent jets, and uni- T liquid temperature (K). versal equilibrium spectra for the roughness of tur- Tf temperature of incoming liquid jet (K). bulent jets. The use of jets for high heat flux cooling Tw temperature of wall (K).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Fluid Flow Outline Fundamentals of Rheology
    Fluid Flow Outline • Fundamentals and applications of rheology • Shear stress and shear rate • Viscosity and types of viscometers • Rheological classification of fluids • Apparent viscosity • Effect of temperature on viscosity • Reynolds number and types of flow • Flow in a pipe • Volumetric and mass flow rate • Friction factor (in straight pipe), friction coefficient (for fittings, expansion, contraction), pressure drop, energy loss • Pumping requirements (overcoming friction, potential energy, kinetic energy, pressure energy differences) 2 Fundamentals of Rheology • Rheology is the science of deformation and flow – The forces involved could be tensile, compressive, shear or bulk (uniform external pressure) • Food rheology is the material science of food – This can involve fluid or semi-solid foods • A rheometer is used to determine rheological properties (how a material flows under different conditions) – Viscometers are a sub-set of rheometers 3 1 Applications of Rheology • Process engineering calculations – Pumping requirements, extrusion, mixing, heat transfer, homogenization, spray coating • Determination of ingredient functionality – Consistency, stickiness etc. • Quality control of ingredients or final product – By measurement of viscosity, compressive strength etc. • Determination of shelf life – By determining changes in texture • Correlations to sensory tests – Mouthfeel 4 Stress and Strain • Stress: Force per unit area (Units: N/m2 or Pa) • Strain: (Change in dimension)/(Original dimension) (Units: None) • Strain rate: Rate
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Dimensional Analysis and Similarity
    Chapter 5 Dimensional Analysis and Similarity Motivation. In this chapter we discuss the planning, presentation, and interpretation of experimental data. We shall try to convince you that such data are best presented in dimensionless form. Experiments which might result in tables of output, or even mul- tiple volumes of tables, might be reduced to a single set of curves—or even a single curve—when suitably nondimensionalized. The technique for doing this is dimensional analysis. Chapter 3 presented gross control-volume balances of mass, momentum, and en- ergy which led to estimates of global parameters: mass flow, force, torque, total heat transfer. Chapter 4 presented infinitesimal balances which led to the basic partial dif- ferential equations of fluid flow and some particular solutions. These two chapters cov- ered analytical techniques, which are limited to fairly simple geometries and well- defined boundary conditions. Probably one-third of fluid-flow problems can be attacked in this analytical or theoretical manner. The other two-thirds of all fluid problems are too complex, both geometrically and physically, to be solved analytically. They must be tested by experiment. Their behav- ior is reported as experimental data. Such data are much more useful if they are ex- pressed in compact, economic form. Graphs are especially useful, since tabulated data cannot be absorbed, nor can the trends and rates of change be observed, by most en- gineering eyes. These are the motivations for dimensional analysis. The technique is traditional in fluid mechanics and is useful in all engineering and physical sciences, with notable uses also seen in the biological and social sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • International Conference Euler's Equations: 250 Years on Program
    International Conference Euler’s Equations: 250 Years On Program of Lectures and Discussions (Dated: June 14, 2007) Schedule of the meeting Tuesday 19 June Wednesday 20 June Thursday 21 June Friday 22 June 08:30-08:40 Opening remarks 08:30-09:20 08:30-09:20 G. Eyink 08:30-09:20 F. Busse 08:40-09:10 E. Knobloch O. Darrigol/U. Frisch 09:30-10:00 P. Constantin 09:30-10:00 Ph. Cardin 09:20-10:10 J. Gibbon 09:20-09:50 M. Eckert 10:00-10:30 T. Hou 10:00-10:30 J.-F. Pinton 10:20-10:50 Y. Brenier 09:50-10:30 Coffee break 10:30-11:00 Coffee break 10:30-11:00 Coffee break 10:50-11:20 Coffee break 10:30-11:20 P. Perrier 11:00-11:30 K. Ohkitani 11:00-11:30 Discussion D 11:20-11:50 K. Sreenivasan 11:20-12:30 Poster session II 11:30-12:00 P. Monkewitz 11:30-12:30 Discussion C 12:00-12:30 C.F. Barenghi 12:00-12:30 G.J.F. van Heijst 12:30-14:00 Lunch break 12:30-14:00 Lunch break 12:30-14:00 Lunch break 12:30-14:00 Lunch break 14:00-14:50 I. Procaccia 14:00-14:30 G. Gallavotti 14:00-14:50 M. Ghil 14:00-14:30 N. Mordant 14:50-15:20 L. Biferale 14:40-15:10 L. Saint Raymond 14:50-15:20 A. Nusser 14:30-15:00 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Compressible Computational Fluid Dynamics James S
    Introduction to Compressible Computational Fluid Dynamics James S. Sochacki Department of Mathematics James Madison University [email protected] Abstract This document is intended as an introduction to computational fluid dynamics at the upper undergraduate level. It is assumed that the student has had courses through three dimensional calculus and some computer programming experience with numer- ical algorithms. A course in differential equations is recommended. This document is intended to be used by undergraduate instructors and students to gain an under- standing of computational fluid dynamics. The document can be used in a classroom or research environment at the undergraduate level. The idea of this work is to have the students use the modules to discover properties of the equations and then relate this to the physics of fluid dynamics. Many issues, such as rarefactions and shocks are left out of the discussion because the intent is to have the students discover these concepts and then study them with the instructor. The document is used in part of the undergraduate MATH 365 - Computation Fluid Dynamics course at James Madi- son University (JMU) and is part of the joint NSF Grant between JMU and North Carolina Central University (NCCU): A Collaborative Computational Sciences Pro- gram. This document introduces the full three-dimensional Navier Stokes equations. As- sumptions to these equations are made to derive equations that are accessible to un- dergraduates with the above prerequisites. These equations are approximated using finite difference methods. The development of the equations and finite difference methods are contained in this document. Software modules and their corresponding documentation in Fortran 90, Maple and Matlab can be downloaded from the web- site: http://www.math.jmu.edu/~jim/compressible.html.
    [Show full text]
  • Anomalous Viscosity, Resistivity, and Thermal Diffusivity of the Solar
    Anomalous Viscosity, Resistivity, and Thermal Diffusivity of the Solar Wind Plasma Mahendra K. Verma Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208016, India November 12, 2018 Abstract In this paper we have estimated typical anomalous viscosity, re- sistivity, and thermal difffusivity of the solar wind plasma. Since the solar wind is collsionless plasma, we have assumed that the dissipation in the solar wind occurs at proton gyro radius through wave-particle interactions. Using this dissipation length-scale and the dissipation rates calculated using MHD turbulence phenomenology [Verma et al., 1995a], we estimate the viscosity and proton thermal diffusivity. The resistivity and electron’s thermal diffusivity have also been estimated. We find that all our transport quantities are several orders of mag- nitude higher than those calculated earlier using classical transport theories of Braginskii. In this paper we have also estimated the eddy turbulent viscosity. arXiv:chao-dyn/9509002v1 5 Sep 1995 1 1 Introduction The solar wind is a collisionless plasma; the distance travelled by protons between two consecutive Coulomb collisions is approximately 3 AU [Barnes, 1979]. Therefore, the dissipation in the solar wind involves wave-particle interactions rather than particle-particle collisions. For the observational evidence of the wave-particle interactions in the solar wind refer to the review articles by Gurnett [1991], Marsch [1991] and references therein. Due to these reasons for the calculations of transport coefficients in the solar wind, the scales of wave-particle interactions appear more appropriate than those of particle-particle interactions [Braginskii, 1965]. Note that the viscosity in a turbulent fluid is scale dependent.
    [Show full text]
  • Stability of Swirling Flow in Passive Cyclonic Separator in Microgravity
    STABILITY OF SWIRLING FLOW IN PASSIVE CYCLONIC SEPARATOR IN MICROGRAVITY by ADEL OMAR KHARRAZ Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Y. Kamotani Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY January, 2018 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis dissertation of Adel Omar Kharraz candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy*. Committee Chair Yasuhiro Kamotani Committee Member Jaikrishnan Kadambi Committee Member Paul Barnhart Committee Member Beverly Saylor Date of Defense July 24, 2017 *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. ii Dedication This is for my parents, my wife, and my children. iii Table of Contents Dedication …………………………………………………..…………………………………………………….. iii Table of Contents ………………………………………..…………………………………………………….. iv List of Tables ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… vi List of Figures ……………………………………………………………………………………..……………… vii Nomenclature ………………………………………………………………………………..………………….. xi Acknowledgments ……………………………………………………………………….……………………. xv Abstract ……………………………………………….……………………………………………………………. xvi Chapter 1 Introduction ……………………………………………….…………………………………….. 1 1.1 Phase Separation Significance in Microgravity ……………………………………..…. 1 1.2 Effect of Microgravity on Passive Cyclonic Separators …………………………….. 3 1.3 Free Surface (Interface) in Microgravity Environment ……………………….……. 5 1.4 CWRU Separator …………………………………………………….……………………………….
    [Show full text]