Supporting Information

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Supporting Information Supporting Information Phytochemicals of Conocarpus spp. as a natural and safe source of phenolic compounds and antioxidants Hanan S. Afifi 1,*, Hassan M. Al Marzooqi 1, Mohammad J. Tabbaa 2,3 and Ahmed A. Arran 2 1 Food Research Section, R&D Division, Abu Dhabi Agriculture and Food Safety Authority, P.O. Box 52150, Abu Dhabi, UAE; [email protected] 2 Agriculture Research Section, R&D Division, Abu Dhabi Agriculture and Food Safety Authority, P.O. Box 52150, Abu Dhabi, UAE; [email protected] (M.J.T.); [email protected] (A.A.A.) 3 Department of Animal Production, School of Agriculture, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan; [email protected] (M.J.T.) * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +97128181759 Abbreviations RSM Response Surface Methodology CCD Central Composite Design CL Conocarpus lancifolius CE Conocarpus erectus CLL Conocarpus lancifolius leaves CLF Conocarpus lancifolius fruits CLR Conocarpus lancifolius roots CEL Conocarpus erectus leaves CEF Conocarpus erectus fruits CER Conocarpus erectus roots Public Table S1. Central composite design arrangement and responses variable of vanillic acid (ppm) at P ≤ 0.05. Standard Order erectus lancifolius Coded variables Leaves Roots Fruits Leaves Roots Fruits Solvent Temp Time (h) conc.% (°C) 1 1 (100) 1 (65) 0(2) 2.54 ± 0.05 22.87 ± 3.89 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 15.62 ± 1.23 1.89 ± 0.11 2 −1 (50) 0 (55) 1(3) 0.00 ± 0.00 10.11 ± 0.20 8.64 ± 0.17 0.00 ± 0.00 20.53 ± 0.72 2.36 ± 0.07 3 0 (75) 0 (55) 0(2) 5.00 ± 0.36 16.40 ± 0.93 7.06 ± 0.53 0.01 ± 0.02 19.97 ± 0.16 0.00 ± 0.00 4 0 (75) 1 (65) 1(3) 2.72 ± 0.11 4.45 ± 0.17 5.15 ± 0.26 0.00 ± 0.00 8.04 ± 0.16 1.23 ± 1.10 5 1(100) 0 (55) −1(1) 8.63 ± 0.20 1.786 ± 0.14 2.24 ± 0.05 0.00 ± 0.00 1.27 ± 0.02 0.00 ± 0.00 6 1(100) −1 (45) 0(2) 3.73 ± 0.04 15.40 ± 0.98 4.15 ± 0.19 0.00 ± 0.00 26.40 ± 1.14 0.00 ± 0.00 7 −1(50) 1 (65) 0(2) 8.47 ± 0.21 12.35 ± 0.87 10.78 ± 0.80 0.00 ± 0.00 14.97 ± 0.35 1.46 ± 0.12 8 0 (75) 0 (55) 0(2) 6.22 ± 4.68 18.36 ± 1.00 6.65 ± 0.99 0.00 ± 0.00 15.73 ± 0.63 0.00 ± 0.00 9 0 (75) 1 (65) −1(1) 0.00 ± 0.00 21.60 ± 1.65 4.27 ± 0.25 0.00 ± 0.00 11.99 ± 2.70 0.00 ± 0.00 10 1(100) 0 (55) 1(3) 0.00 ± 0.00 39.37 ± 0.76 12.69 ± 0.27 4.18 ± 0.32 20.26 ± 1.04 0.00 ± 0.00 11 0 (75) −1 (45) 1(3) 5.05 ± 0.06 29.21 ± 0.71 3.50 ± 0.25 3.04 ± 0.27 15.12 ± 0.39 0.00 ± 0.00 12 0 (75) 0 (55) 0(2) 4.00 ± 0.11 16.06 ± 0.30 9.74 ± 0.24 0.00 ± 0.00 15.41 ± 0.57 0.00 ± 0.00 13 −1(50) 0 (55) −1(1) 3.73 ± 0.40 0.00 ± 0.00 2.02 ± 0.03 2.09 ± 0.09 36.57 ± 1.31 0.00 ± 0.00 14 0 (75) −1 (45) −1(1) 0.00 ± 0.00 8.96 ± 0.25 7.57 ± 0.39 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 15 −1(50) −1 (45) 0(2) 3.94 ± 0.19 124.79 ± 3.80 23.17 ± 0.21 7.22 ± 0.47 44.48 ± 2.04 0.00 ± 0.00 Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Public Table S2. Central composite design arrangement and responses variable of p-coumaric acid (ppm) at P ≤ 0.05. Standard Order erectus lancifolius Coded variables Leaves Roots Fruits Leaves Roots Fruits Solvent Temp Time (h) conc.% (°C) 1 1 (100) 1 (65) 0(2) 0.02 ± 0.02 3.58 ± 1.24 37.49 ± 4.31 5.36 ± 0.41 2.82 ± 0.12 38.41 ± 1.69 2 −1 (50) 0 (55) 1(3) 4.96 ± 0.06 0.78 ± 0.04 0.00 ± 0.00 74.48 ± 2.87 2.59 ± 0.02 0.00 ± 0.00 3 0 (75) 0 (55) 0(2) 14.74 ± 0.07 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 16.68 ± 1.91 4.16 ± 0.14 15.65 ± 0.33 4 0 (75) 1 (65) 1(3) 6.80 ± 2.24 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 45.48 ± 11.79 14.97 ± 0.91 27.00 ± 6.30 5 1(100) 0 (55) −1(1) 115.46 ± 2.36 1.76 ± 0.06 9.98 ± 0.87 20.37 ± 1.56 3.00 ± 0.10 21.57 ± 1.75 6 1(100) −1 (45) 0(2) 0.00 ± 0.00 0.84 ± 0.04 0.00 ± 0.00 1.80 ± 0.69 4.16 ± 0.14 4.88 ± 0.13 7 −1(50) 1 (65) 0(2) 3.40 ± 0.01 1.13 ± 0.03 1.11 ± 0.13 44.22 ± 6.74 3.34 ± 0.12 1.03 ± 0.04 8 0 (75) 0 (55) 0(2) 19.90 ± 5.13 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 18.81 ± 2.23 3.79 ± 0.13 18.72 ± 0.50 9 0 (75) 1 (65) −1(1) 10.17 ± 0.09 8.97 ± 0.07 0.63 ± 0.05 1.06 ± 0.05 1.20 ± 0.82 0.00 ± 0.00 10 1(100) 0 (55) 1(3) 134.14 ± 1.99 13.61 ± 0.54 42.47 ± 2.32 0.21 ± 0.02 19.79 ± 0.64 7.76 ± 0.25 11 0 (75) −1 (45) 1(3) 12.22 ± 0.74 4.57 ± 0.05 1.37 ± 0.14 2.01 ± 1.81 1.47 ± 0.04 2.56 ± 0.05 12 0 (75) 0 (55) 0(2) 18.46 ± 0.56 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 15.05 ± 0.21 3.08 ± 0.09 15.47 ± 1.13 13 −1(50) 0 (55) −1(1) 1.63 ± 0.05 2.25 ± 0.06 0.63 ± 0.03 3.42 ± 1.26 4.93 ± 0.21 10.34 ± 0.79 14 0 (75) −1 (45) −1(1) 1.96 ± 0.36 0.47 ± 0.03 1.90 ± 0.28 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 1.01 ± 0.02 15 −1(50) −1 (45) 0(2) 1.95 ± 0.41 235.06 ± 5.00 0.00 ± 0.00 2.59 ± 0.40 46.38 ± 1.40 0.00 ± 0.00 Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Public Table S3. Central composite design arrangement and responses variable of t-ferulic acid (ppm) at P ≤ 0.05. Standard Order erectus lancifolius Coded variables Leaves Roots Fruits Leaves Roots Fruits Solvent Temp Time (h) conc.% (°C) 1 1 (100) 1 (65) 0(2) 2.67 ± 0.04 4.14 ± 1.42 0.16 ± 0.15 0.00 ± 0.00 2.55 ± 0.09 0.00 ± 0.00 2 −1 (50) 0 (55) 1(3) 51.80 ± 1.53 0.41 ± 0.01 1.79 ± 0.37 0.00 ± 0.00 3.72 ± 0.18 0.00 ± 0.00 3 0 (75) 0 (55) 0(2) 27.03 ± 0.25 1.22 ± 0.02 1.03 ± 0.06 0.00 ± 0.00 1.40 ± 0.03 0.00 ± 0.00 4 0 (75) 1 (65) 1(3) 19.19 ± 0.17 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.14 ± 0.13 5 1(100) 0 (55) −1(1) 31.86 ± 1.07 1.11 ± 0.02 0.00 ± 0.00 3.96 ± 0.10 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 6 1(100) −1 (45) 0(2) 107.45 ± 1.97 0.96 ± 0.14 4.21 ± 0.56 122.75 ± 5.73 6.36 ± 0.06 0.00 ± 0.00 7 −1(50) 1 (65) 0(2) 31.40 ± 0.37 1.20 ± 0.02 1.02 ± 0.03 0.00 ± 0.00 0.80 ± 0.03 1.56 ± 0.08 8 0 (75) 0 (55) 0(2) 23.44 ± 10.50 1.37 ± 0.41 1.38 ± 0.30 0.00 ± 0.00 2.02 ± 0.02 0.00 ± 0.00 9 0 (75) 1 (65) −1(1) 54.44 ± 0.82 1.71 ± 0.06 1.20 ± 0.06 1.09 ± 0.11 0.46 ± 0.04 0.00 ± 0.00 10 1(100) 0 (55) 1(3) 45.33 ± 1.81 1.83 ± 0.08 2.28 ± 0.16 175.20 ± 1.72 8.59 ± 0.35 0.00 ± 0.00 11 0 (75) −1 (45) 1(3) 37.25 ± 3.03 3.03 ± 0.06 0.00 ± 0.00 0.35 ± 0.31 1.08 ± 0.07 1.55 ± 0.10 12 0 (75) 0 (55) 0(2) 27.13 ± 0.27 1.41 ± 0.05 1.00 ± 0.13 0.00 ± 0.00 1.51 ± 0.17 0.00 ± 0.00 13 −1(50) 0 (55) −1(1) 0.84 ± 0.04 0.61 ± 0.02 0.83 ± 0.05 32.01 ± 1.07 1.50 ± 0.17 0.00 ± 0.00 14 0 (75) −1 (45) −1(1) 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 1.55 ± 0.32 22.42 ± 2.44 0.00 ± 0.00 1.63 ± 0.09 15 −1(50) −1 (45) 0(2) 1.34 ± 0.08 137.07 ± 1.29 4.10 ± 0.10 37.74 ± 1.07 50.16 ± 1.23 0.00 ± 0.00 Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Recommended publications
  • Effect of Damas(Conocarpus Lancifolius)Extract and Neemazal
    بسم هللا الرحمن الرحيم Sudan University of Science and Technology College of Agricultural Studies Department of Plant Protection Effect of Damas(Conocarpus lancifolius)extract and NeemAzal- T/S against Cotton Mealy Bug )Phenacoccus solenopsis( أثر مستخلص الدمس و مبيد النيمازال على حشرة البق الدقيقى فى القطن A graduation project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of B.Sc. Agric. in Plant Protection. By: Rayan Mohamed Ahmed Osman Supervisor: Dr. Loai Mohamed Elamin Ahmed Department of Plant Protection College of Agricultural Studies, Shambat Sudan University of Science and Technology (SUST) September, 2016 I اﻵية بسم هللا الرمحن الرحمي قال تعالي: (ا َّن يِف َخلْ يق السماوا يت وا َﻷر يض وا ْخ يتﻻ يف اللَّي يل وال ََّّنَا ير والْ ُف ْ يْل الَّ يتيتَ ْج يري ِ َّ َ َ َ ْ َ ْ َ َ يِف الْ َب ْح ير يب َما يَن َف ُع النَّا َس َوَما َأن َز َل ا َّ َُّلل يمنَال َّس َماء يمن َّماء فَأَ ْحيَا يب يه ا َﻷ ْر َض بَ ْع َد َم ْويِتَا َوبَ َّث يفهيَا يمن ُ يلك َدابَّ ٍة َوتَ ْ يْصي يف ال ليرََيحي َوال َّس َحا يب الْ ُم َس َّخ ير بَْ َْي ال َّس َماء َوا َﻷ ْر يض َﻷآََي ٍت يلل َق ْو ٍم يَ ْع يقلُو َن ( سورة البقرة اﻷآية )461( صدق هللا العظمي II DEDICATION I would like to dedicate This work to my family, all friends and to those who helped me In this research Thank you all III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All my thanks and prays to “Allah”, who gave me strength and Patience to complete this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Anogeissus Acuminata (Roxb) Wall Ex Bedd in Vitro
    International Journal of Complementary & Alternative Medicine Review Article Open Access Detection of free radical scavenging activity of dhaura, anogeissus acuminata (roxb) wall ex bedd in vitro Abstract Volume 12 Issue 4 - 2019 The free radical inhibitory activity of Dhaura, Anogeissus acuminata extracted in chloroform, ethanol and water was investigated in vitro. The DPPH inhibition by the Ganesh Chandra Jagetia, Zairempuii different stem extract depended on the concentration and the ethanol extract was found Department of Zoology, Mizoram University, India to be the most potent as the lower concentration of it was most effective in scavenging Correspondence: Ganesh Chandra Jagetia, Department of different free radicals. The analysis of superoxide radical scavenging activity showed that Zoology, Mizoram University, India, Email the aqueous extract was most effective when compared to chloroform and ethanol extracts. The different extracts of Dhaura also inhibited the generation of nitric oxide radical Received: August 5, 2019 | Published: August 27, 2019 depending on its concentration and maximum effect was observed at 200μg/ml. Our study indicates that free radical scavenging activity of Dhaura affirms the medicinal use by the practitioners of folklore medicine. Keywords: anogeissus acuminata, DPPH, superoxide, nitric oxide, endoplasmic reticulum, peroxisomes, mitochondria Abbreviations: EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; enlargement of spleen cold, dysuria, cough, excessive perspiration, 15 NBT, nitrobluetetrazolium; TCA, trichloroacetic acid; NED, N–(1– cholera, urinary disorders, snake bite and in scorpion sting. The Naphthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride gum produced by Dhaura is called Ghatti or Indian gum and is used as a tonic after delivery.15,16 The preclinical studies have shown the Introduction alleviation of alloxan–induced diabetes in rats.17.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Biomass on Wind Reduction Pattern in BITS Pilani Dubai Campus
    International Conference on Biological, Civil and Environmental Engineering (BCEE-2014) March 17-18, 2014 Dubai (UAE) Effect of Biomass on Wind Reduction Pattern in BITS Pilani Dubai Campus Vivin Karthik1, Mohamed Ebrahim2, and Dr.Geetha3 Abstract—Wind velocity readings within and outside the campus (barren desert land), will give us an idea in wind reduction facilitated by the tree biomass available in campus and also the net difference from the graphs from the effectiveness of the tree along with the buildings, where the wind velocity readings within the inside perimeter of the college campus to the outside velocity ratio gives us the wind reduction ratio (R) , in the presence and absence of biomass. Keywords— Barren desert, biomass, reduction ratio ,wind velocity I. INTRODUCTION HE effect of wind patterns on biomass growth have been T well documented. The ideal scenario of the reduction of wind pollution and soil erosion would be well recognized through the cultivation of trees to mitigate such effects[1][2][4]. While considering a desert ecosystem, the scenario of the potential huge winds and sandstorms raging across the biomass of this sensitive ecosystem could thus purport the real need of biomass , apart from man made structures in tackling such issues.[3] Fig. 1 Blueprint of the university biomass and building locations The ideal man made structure in an urban ecosystem within with sector markings the desert is conceived with the location of the university campus, where theres biomass planted inside ( major trees are The sectors that would have buildings immediately after the angiosperms that are grouped to eudicots containing fence and then biomass, and the sectors that have biomass first, Azadirachta indica[8], Delonix regia[7], Millingtonia hortensis[5] and then buildings are clearly distinguishable by the fact that and Conocarpus lancifolius[6]).
    [Show full text]
  • TAXON:Conocarpus Erectus L. SCORE:5.0 RATING:Evaluate
    TAXON: Conocarpus erectus L. SCORE: 5.0 RATING: Evaluate Taxon: Conocarpus erectus L. Family: Combretaceae Common Name(s): button mangrove Synonym(s): Conocarpus acutifolius Willd. ex Schult. buttonwood Conocarpus procumbens L. Sea mulberry Assessor: Chuck Chimera Status: Assessor Approved End Date: 30 Jul 2018 WRA Score: 5.0 Designation: EVALUATE Rating: Evaluate Keywords: Tropical Tree, Naturalized, Coastal, Pure Stands, Water-Dispersed Qsn # Question Answer Option Answer 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? 103 Does the species have weedy races? Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If 201 island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute "wet (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 n Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or 204 y=1, n=0 y subtropical climates Does the species have a history of repeated introductions 205 y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 n outside its natural range? 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2), n= question 205 y 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 n 402 Allelopathic 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals 405 Toxic to animals y=1, n=0 n 406 Host for recognized pests and pathogens 407 Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans y=1, n=0 n 408 Creates a fire hazard in natural ecosystems y=1, n=0 n 409 Is a shade tolerant plant at some stage of its life cycle y=1, n=0 n Creation Date: 30 Jul 2018 (Conocarpus erectus L.) Page 1 of 17 TAXON: Conocarpus erectus L.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ecological Assessment of the Coastal Plains of North Western Somalia (Somaliland)
    IUCN Eastern Africa Programme Somali Natural Resources Management Programme An Ecological Assessment of the Coastal Plains of North Western Somalia (Somaliland) Malte Sommerlatte and Abdi Umar May 2000 IUCN Eastern Africa Programme Somali Natural Resources Management Programme An Ecological Assessment of the Coastal Plains of North Western Somalia (Somaliland) By: Malte Sommerlatte and Abdi Umar IUCN CONSULTANTS May 2000 Table of Contents SUMMARY....................................................................................................................................... i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................ iii 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 OBJECTIVES OF ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................. 1 1.2 A REVIEW OF PREVIOUS STUDIES ...................................................................................... 1 1.3 SOCIAL STRUCTURES OF THE SOMALILAND COASTAL PLAINS PASTORALISTS ............... 3 1.4 LOCAL REGULATIONS CONTROLLING LAND USE AND NATURAL RESOURCES .............. 4 1.5 THE PRESENT POLITICAL SITUATION IN SOMALILAND..................................................... 6 2. SURVEY METHODS.................................................................................................................... 7 2.1. VEGETATION TRANSECTS..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conocarpus Lancifolius Engl. (Combretaceae) Photosynthetic Apparatus Suffers Damage in Heavy Metal Contaminated Soil
    Botany Conocarpus lancifolius Engl. (Combretaceae) photosynthetic apparatus suffers damage in heavy metal contaminated soil Journal: Botany Manuscript ID cjb-2018-0047.R5 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 04-Dec-2018 Author: Complete List of Authors: Redha, Amina; Kuwait University, Biological Sciences Al-Hasan, Redha; Kuwait University, Biological Sciences Jose, Jacquilion; Kuwait University, Biological Sciences Saju, Divya; Kuwait University, Biological Sciences Afzal, Mohammad;Draft Kuwait University, Biological Sciences; Retired, Conocarpus lancifolius, chlorophyll fluorescence, electron transport rate, Keyword: photosynthetic rate, photosystem II Is the invited manuscript for consideration in a Special Not applicable (regular submission) Issue? : https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/botany-pubs Page 1 of 32 Botany Revised Manuscript ID: cjb-2018-0047.R5 Conocarpus lancifolius Engl. (Combretaceae) photosynthetic apparatus suffers damage in heavy metal contaminated soil Amina Redha, Redah Al-Hasan, Jacquilion Jose, Divya Saju, Mohammad Afzal⌘ Department of Biological Studies, Faculty of Science, Kuwait University, Kuwait Amina Redha: [email protected] Redha Al-Hasan: [email protected] Jacquilion Jose: [email protected] Divya Saju: [email protected] Running title: Conocarpus lancifolius responses to heavy metal stress Corresponding author present address: M. Afzal⌘, 2200-Traemoor Village Way, Nashville, TN 37209, USA. Tel. +1 (352) 681 7347 email: [email protected] 1 https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/botany-pubs Botany Page 2 of 32 Abstract Conocarpus lancifolius Engl. (Combretaceae), a heat tolerant plant, could be used for phytoremediation of polluted soil. We aimed to analyze the physiological changes in C. lancifolius exposed to single and mixed heavy metals (HMs), cadmium (Cd2+), nickel (Ni2+), and lead (Pb2+). Under controlled growth conditions, some groups of plants were exposed to a single HM at concentrations of 25 or 50 µM and other groups were exposed to 25 µM HM mixtures, for 30 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Dicotyledons
    Dicotyledons COMBRETACEAE R. Br., nom. cons. 1810. COMBRETUM FAMILY Shrubs, trees, or woody vines. Leaves alternate or opposite, simple, pinnate-veined, petiolate, stipulate or estipulate. Flowers in terminal or axillary spikes, racemes, panicles, or heads, acti- nomorphic, bisexual or unisexual (staminate) (plants dioecious or polygamodioecious), brac- teate, bracteolate or ebracteolate; hypanthium prolonged beyond the ovary, the lower part adnate to the ovary, the upper part free; sepals 4 or 5, connate; petals 5 and free or absent; nec- taries present; stamens 5–10, the filaments free, the anthers 2-locular, versatile, longitudinally dehiscent; ovary 2- to 5-carpellate, 1-loculate, the style 1. Fruit a drupe. A family of 14 genera and about 500 species; nearly cosmopolitan. Terminaliaceae J. St.-Hil. (1805).proof Selected references: Graham (1964b); Stace (2010). 1. Leaves opposite, decussate. 2. Tree or erect shrub; petiole with nectar glands; flowers inconspicuous, the petals ca. 1 mm long, greenish white ...........................................................................................................................Laguncularia 2. Vine or scandent shrub; petiole without nectar glands; flowers showy, the petals 1–2 cm long, white to pink or red ..............................................................................................................................Combretum 1. Leaves alternate, spiral. 3. Flowers in dense spherical or oblong heads; fruits in a dry, conelike head ....................Conocarpus 3. Flowers
    [Show full text]
  • Trees of Somalia
    Trees of Somalia A Field Guide for Development Workers Desmond Mahony Oxfam Research Paper 3 Oxfam (UK and Ireland) © Oxfam (UK and Ireland) 1990 First published 1990 Revised 1991 Reprinted 1994 A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library ISBN 0 85598 109 1 Published by Oxfam (UK and Ireland), 274 Banbury Road, Oxford 0X2 7DZ, UK, in conjunction with the Henry Doubleday Research Association, Ryton-on-Dunsmore, Coventry CV8 3LG, UK Typeset by DTP Solutions, Bullingdon Road, Oxford Printed on environment-friendly paper by Oxfam Print Unit This book converted to digital file in 2010 Contents Acknowledgements IV Introduction Chapter 1. Names, Climatic zones and uses 3 Chapter 2. Tree descriptions 11 Chapter 3. References 189 Chapter 4. Appendix 191 Tables Table 1. Botanical tree names 3 Table 2. Somali tree names 4 Table 3. Somali tree names with regional v< 5 Table 4. Climatic zones 7 Table 5. Trees in order of drought tolerance 8 Table 6. Tree uses 9 Figures Figure 1. Climatic zones (based on altitude a Figure 2. Somali road and settlement map Vll IV Acknowledgements The author would like to acknowledge the assistance provided by the following organisations and individuals: Oxfam UK for funding me to compile these notes; the Henry Doubleday Research Association (UK) for funding the publication costs; the UK ODA forestry personnel for their encouragement and advice; Peter Kuchar and Richard Holt of NRA CRDP of Somalia for encouragement and essential information; Dr Wickens and staff of SEPESAL at Kew Gardens for information, advice and assistance; staff at Kew Herbarium, especially Gwilym Lewis, for practical advice on drawing, and Jan Gillet for his knowledge of Kew*s Botanical Collections and Somalian flora.
    [Show full text]
  • ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN No. 256 CAYS of the BELIZE
    ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN No. 256 CAYS OF THE BELIZE BARRIER REEF AND LAGOON by D . R. Stoddart, F. R. Fosberg and D. L. Spellman Issued by THE SMlTHSONlAN INSTITUTION Washington, D. C., U.S.A. April 1982 CONTENTS List of Figures List of Plates i i Abstract 1 1. Introduction 2 2. Structure and environment 5 3. Sand cays of the northern barrier reef 9 St George's East Cay Paunch Cay Sergeant' s Cay Curlew Cay Go£ f ' s Cay Seal Cay English Cay Sandbore south of English Cay Samphire Spot Rendezvous Cay Jack's Cays Skiff Sand Cay Glory Tobacco Cay South Water Cay Carrie Bow Cay Curlew Cay 5. Sand cays of the southern barrier reef 23 Silk or Queen Cays North Silk Cay Middle Silk Cay Sauth Silk Cay Samphire Cay Round Cay Pompion Cay Ranguana Cay North Spot Tom Owen's Cay Tom Owen's East Cay Tom Owen's West Cay Cays between Tom Owen's Cays and Northeast Sapodilla Cay The Sapodilla Cays Northeast Sapodilla Cay Frank 's Cays Nicolas Cay Hunting Cay Lime Cay Ragged Cay Seal Cays 5. Cays of the barrier reef lagoon A. The northern lagoon Ambergris Cay Cay Caulker Cay Chapel St George ' s Cay Cays between Cay Chapel and Belize ~ohocay Stake Bank Spanish Lookout Cay Water Cay B. The Southern Triangles Robinson Point Cay Robinson Island Spanish Cay C. Cays of the central lagoon Tobacco Range Coco Plum Cay Man-o '-War Cay Water Range Weewee Cay Cat Cay Lagoon cays between Stewart Cay and Baker's Rendezvous Jack's Cay Buttonwood Cay Trapp 's Cay Cary Cay Bugle Cay Owen Cay Scipio Cay Colson Cay Hatchet Cay Little Water Cay Laughing Bird Cay Placentia Cay Harvest Cay iii D.
    [Show full text]
  • Combretaceae: Phylogeny, Biogeography and DNA
    COPYRIGHT AND CITATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR THIS THESIS/ DISSERTATION o Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. o NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. o ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. How to cite this thesis Surname, Initial(s). (2012) Title of the thesis or dissertation. PhD. (Chemistry)/ M.Sc. (Physics)/ M.A. (Philosophy)/M.Com. (Finance) etc. [Unpublished]: University of Johannesburg. Retrieved from: https://ujdigispace.uj.ac.za (Accessed: Date). Combretaceae: Phylogeny, Biogeography and DNA Barcoding by JEPHRIS GERE THESIS Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR in BOTANY in the Faculty of Science at the University of Johannesburg December 2013 Supervisor: Prof Michelle van der Bank Co-supervisor: Dr Olivier Maurin Declaration I declare that this thesis has been composed by me and the work contained within, unless otherwise stated, is my own. _____________________ J. Gere (December 2013) Table of contents Table of contents i Abstract v Foreword vii Index to figures ix Index to tables xv Acknowledgements xviii List of abbreviations xxi Chapter 1: General introduction and objectives 1.1 General introduction 1 1.2 Vegetative morphology 2 1.2.1 Leaf morphology and anatomy 2 1.2.2. Inflorescence 3 1.2.3 Fruit morphology 4 1.3 DNA barcoding 5 1.4 Cytology 6 1.5 Fossil record 7 1.6 Distribution and habitat 7 1.7 Economic Importance 8 1.8 Taxonomic history 9 1.9 Aims and objectives of the study 11 i Table of contents Chapter 2: Molecular phylogeny of Combretaceae with implications for infrageneric classification within subtribe Terminaliinae.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter One Introduction
    Chapter One Introduction The sorghum crop (sorghum bicolor (L.) is a member of the grass family, Poaceae is grown in the world in over 41.91 million hectares and accounts for production of 65.53 million tons of grains with an average yield of 1459.2kg/ha. Nearly 80% of the cultivated area cereal crop in the world after wheat, rice, maize and barely. In acreage, it rants fifth and accounts for 3.5% of total cereal grain production. (Gordon, et al; 1995). Sorghum is also an important source of animal feed and fodder, the term sorghum includes four groups of cultivated sorghum plants viz, grain sorghum (as forage and feed), sweet stakes (as forage and for animal feed), Sudan grass (for forage and pasture), and broom corn (for making brooms). The cultivated sorghum originated in Africa in the region of present – day Sudan and Ethiopia in includes five basic races, viz, bicolor, guinea, candatum, kafir and durra. (Delserone, 2007). In tropical and sub-tropical areas of Africa and Asia sorghum is grown predominantly for human consumption. The grain is usually milled for flour and used for variety of unlearned breads such as roti and chapatti in India and leavened pancake. Like breads such as Injera and kisra in Ethiopia and Sudan, in America and Australia, sorghum is used almost exclusively for stock feed (Shoemaker, et al ; 2010). The yield of sorghum crop is adversely affected due to insect pests, diseases, weeds, nematodes and bird etc. The grain losses range from 10- 15% due to insect pests alone.to achieve higher yield of sorghum crop, 1 proper plant protection measures should be undertaken to prevent losses due to insect pests (Jaipal and Dass ,1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry of Secondary Metabolites and Their Antimicrobial Activity in the Drug Development Process: a Review of the Genus Anogeissus
    Chemistry of secondary metabolites and antimicrobial activity in the drug development process 1 Review Article Chemistry of secondary metabolites and their antimicrobial activity in the drug development process: a review of the Genus Anogeissus A. Mann1, J.O. Amupitan2, A.O. Oyewale2, J.I. Okogun3 and K. Ibrahim 4 1Department of Science Laboratory Technology, The Federal Polytechnic, Bida, P.M.B. 55, Bida, Niger State, Nigeria 2Department of Chemistry, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria 3Department of Medicinal Plant Research and Traditional Medicine, National Institute for Pharmaceutical Research and Development (NIPRD), P.M.B. 21, Garki – Abuja, Nigeria 4Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, National Institute for Pharmaceutical Research and Development (NIPRD), P.M.B.21, Garki – Abuja, Nigeria ABSTRACT The significance of secondary metabolites as antimicrobial agents and its chemistry in the drug development process is reviewed. The genus Anogeissus (Combretaceae) is widely distributed in most tropical and subtropical countries of the world. Anogeissus is a genus of trees, shrubs or small trees. The genus has eight species, five native to South Asia, two indigenous to the southern Arabian Peninsula, and one native to Africa. Genus Anogeissus have long been used in traditional medicine to treat a broad spectrum of disorders. Chemical constituents isolated from Genus Anogeissus so far include amino acids, terpenoids (and their glycoside derivatives); steroids; flavonoids and their glycosides; tannins and other phenolic compounds and lignan. The focus of this paper has been on the phytochemistry of the species of Anogeissus and with the bioactivities of their various metabolites and their general potential in drug development were reviewed.
    [Show full text]