DOCSLIB.ORG

Ophelia: a Psychological Portrait Xena Fitzgerald Class of 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ophelia: a Psychological Portrait Xena Fitzgerald Class of 2017 Ophelia: A Psychological Portrait Xena Fitzgerald Class of 2017 The tragic image of Ophelia, a young representation in art contributed to a variety of popular noblewoman who drowns during the play Hamlet, interpretations of her character. has haunted Britain since Shakespeare wrote her into Ophelia as a character is frequently represented existence around the year 1600. Ophelia reached the as various forms of femininity. Art historian Kimberly peak of her popularity around the mid-nineteenth Rhodes explains that during the Victorian era Ophelia century. In the realm of painting, she was a popular represented a range of female typologies from the subject for Pre-Raphaelite painters who were concerned “dutiful daughter” to the “madwoman.”3 Because with tropes of Victorian femininity as well as with Ophelia has very few lines within the play and her most the psychology of their subjects. In this paper I will signifcant action, her death, does not even appear on consider how the artist Anna Lea Merritt (1844-1930), stage, Rhodes describes her as “a blank page on which who was infuenced by the Pre-Raphaelite movement, patriarchy can inscribe and project its desires.”4 Along leapt beyond popular tropes to visually portray Ophelia with other Shakespearean heroines, Ophelia was taken in her 1880 painting with emotional and psychological up as an exemplar for femininity.5 Moral guides such depth more successfully than her contemporaries (fg. 1). as Anna Jameson’s Characteristics of Women, Moral, Born in Pennsylvania, Merritt, like Mary Poetical, and Historical instructed women and girls to Cassatt, pursued an artistic career in Europe. Instead of emulate Ophelia’s “modesty, grace, and tenderness.”6 following the Impressionists in Paris, Merritt chose to Furthermore, many scholars even note a parallel settle in London in 1870 and work under the infuence between Ophelia and the Virgin Mary.7 The similarity is of the late Pre-Raphaelites. There, she met painters particularly apparent during Act III when Hamlet walks such as Whistler, Burne-Jones, Holman Hunt, and her in while Ophelia kneels alone holding a book much eventual husband Henry Merritt.1 Henry died only three like customary Annunciation scenes as evident in the months after their wedding, and Merritt never remarried. comparison of a ffteenth-century annunciation scene Instead, she dedicated her life to painting and supported (fg. 3) and a Pre-Raphaelite depiction of Hamlet and herself mainly on portrait commissions. Outside of Ophelia by the artist Dante Gabriel Rossetti (fg. 4).8 portraiture, she occasionally painted religious, foral, Scholar Georgianna Ziegler argues that and literary subjects. Like the Pre-Raphaelites, Merritt Victorians idealized Ophelia as “more than human” painted illustrations inspired by British literary heroes and fetishized both her innocence and purity. Ziegler Tennyson and Shakespeare. attributes Ophelia’s popularity as a painting subject to The Pre-Raphaelites were by no means the frst Victorian men’s fascination with “the idea of capturing artistic group interested in Shakespeare. Illustrations of that moment right before a young girl opens into full Shakespearean scenes became immensely popular about womanhood and the death of innocence.”9 However, a century earlier with the formation of John Boydell’s in addition to her symbolism of feminine innocence Shakespeare Gallery, which was dedicated to exhibiting and grace, Ophelia also played another role in Victorian paintings of Shakespearean subjects and published culture: becoming a trope of the ‘madwoman.’ engraved reproductions and smaller Shakespearean Ophelia’s extreme melancholy, vulgar songs, disheveled illustrations.2 Of course, these publications included appearance, and accidental/suicidal death account for illustrations of Ophelia such as the illustration by the interpretation of Ophelia as a subcategory of the Richard Westall (fg. 2). Over the next hundred years ‘madwoman’ trope.10 In her article “The Feminization and beyond, Ophelia’s popularity never fell. Her large of Madness,” art historian Jane Kromm describes how 6 Spring 2017 | Volume 4 | © 2017 | Grinnell College Undergraduate Research Journal Ophelia’s madness is sexualized through various stages be cast among the briers of this working-day world” of undress and close connection with fowers, which without sexualizing her insanity.14 Using a recognizable associate her with the fertility goddess Flora (fg. 5 model in contemporary garb, an undefned setting, and and 6).11 Additionally, Kromm argues that Ophelia is a reliance on photography, Merritt transports Ophelia to represented as the “least passive, most unruly among the the contemporary ‘working-day’ world, making her more lovelorn madwoman prototypes.”12 Kromm identifes relatable for both the artist and the viewer. these madwoman Ophelia-type fgures in various For the portrait-style etching, Merritt relied on illustrations of insane asylums such as the “sprawling sketches from life and photographs (fg. 14 and 15) of Ophelia-type” central fgure in Bonaventura Genelli’s the popular actress Ellen Terry in the role of Ophelia.15 Glance in an Asylum (1850) (fg. 7) and the woman Merritt attempted to render the likeness of the actress dropping wilted fowers in the bottom right hand corner while illustrating the psychology of Ophelia through of Amand Gautier’s Madwomen of the Salpêtrière: her facial expression with furrowed brows and woeful Courtyard of Agitated Inmates (1855) (fg. 8).13 These upward gaze. Contemporary audiences would have fgures in illustrations of psychiatric hospitals indicate easily recognized the face of the well-known actress that while ‘the Ophelia type’ became a subcategory of in her contemporary hairstyle and fur-collared dress, ‘the madwoman,’ depicting Ophelia as a ‘madwoman’ thereby identifying more strongly with her emotionally. was far less popular than depicting her as tragically Only her melancholic expression and loose fstful of beautiful and slightly melancholic. fowers clutched to her breast identify the actress as Artists contemporary to Merritt, such as Pre- Ophelia. Unlike the contemporary paintings described Raphaelite brother John Everett Millais (1829-1896), earlier, there are no indications of the setting of the French Academic painter Alexandre Cabanel (1823- play, since Merritt locates Ophelia in a dark undefned 1889), and Pre-Raphaelite follower John William background. The black background deviates from the Waterhouse (1849-1917) all represent Ophelia as Pre-Raphaelite trend of situating Hamlet and Ophelia in a beautiful and tragic victim in their depiction of vaguely medieval settings and instead lends the etching narrative scenes just before Ophelia’s death (fg. 9, a sense of timelessness that pulls Ophelia into the 10, 11, and 12). Millais and Cabanel both portray a contemporary day. weak and listless Ophelia already fallen into the water, While Merritt’s reliance on photography further emphasizing the tragedy of her death. Cabanel includes “modernizes” Ophelia, her artistic interpretation the broken willow bough behind her to increase the produces the emotional quality of the etching.16 Several narrative understanding of the painting. All three photographers at the time, such as Duchenne de artists accentuate Ophelia’s beauty by depicting her Boulogne and Hugh Welch Diamond, were interested with extremely pale skin, long fowing hair, and in the physiology of human facial expression, including wearing ornate medieval gowns. Compared to these physical expressions of insanity, and photography’s contemporary painters, Merritt’s depictions of Ophelia ability to document such features. Diamond employed are more relatable for the viewer and more sensitively ‘the Ophelia type madwoman’ trope by photographing portray Ophelia’s psychological state. a psychiatric patient in the guise of Ophelia (fg. 16).17 Although Ophelia was a wildly popular subject Considering these photographic pursuits, Merritt’s for male artists, who usually illustrated her more positive writings demonstrate her belief that while photography attributes, Ophelia was far less popular among female can assist the artist in accurate portrayals of facial artists, who preferred to paint Shakespearean heroines expression, the painter can portray emotions far beyond such as Juliet, Rosalind, or Celia who provided clearer the ability of the camera. She writes, “source[s] of moral education.” In fact, perhaps “Photography can fx the features and because of the moral ambiguity surrounding Ophelia’s expression of a face at the given moment, Character, Merritt was one of the only female artists at but an artist receives the expression of a the time to paint Ophelia and one of the only artists face in the sympathetic mirror of his own not to idealize her portrayal of Ophelia. In her frst soul and acquires the skill to reproduce it depiction of Ophelia from 1879 (fg. 13), Merritt directly with paints on canvas... he will convey a contradicts Jameson’s moral education guide which sense of Character beyond the power of described Ophelia as “too soft, too good, too fair, to the photograph.”18 Spring 2017 | Volume 4 | © 2017 | Grinnell College Undergraduate Research Journal 7 This quote demonstrates that Merritt identifed with which typically represented innocence as: “...the most the subjects that she painted and valued their emotional underhand, grasping, selfsh, ill-regulated little plant and psychological state. She considered it her duty that exists.”24 For Merritt, the rose,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Classical Nakedness in British Sculpture and Historical Painting 1798-1840 Cora Hatshepsut Gilroy-Ware Ph.D Univ
    MARMOREALITIES: CLASSICAL NAKEDNESS IN BRITISH SCULPTURE AND HISTORICAL PAINTING 1798-1840 CORA HATSHEPSUT GILROY-WARE PH.D UNIVERSITY OF YORK HISTORY OF ART SEPTEMBER 2013 ABSTRACT Exploring the fortunes of naked Graeco-Roman corporealities in British art achieved between 1798 and 1840, this study looks at the ideal body’s evolution from a site of ideological significance to a form designed consciously to evade political meaning. While the ways in which the incorporation of antiquity into the French Revolutionary project forged a new kind of investment in the classical world have been well-documented, the drastic effects of the Revolution in terms of this particular cultural formation have remained largely unexamined in the context of British sculpture and historical painting. By 1820, a reaction against ideal forms and their ubiquitous presence during the Revolutionary and Napoleonic wartime becomes commonplace in British cultural criticism. Taking shape in a series of chronological case-studies each centring on some of the nation’s most conspicuous artists during the period, this thesis navigates the causes and effects of this backlash, beginning with a state-funded marble monument to a fallen naval captain produced in 1798-1803 by the actively radical sculptor Thomas Banks. The next four chapters focus on distinct manifestations of classical nakedness by Benjamin West, Benjamin Robert Haydon, Thomas Stothard together with Richard Westall, and Henry Howard together with John Gibson and Richard James Wyatt, mapping what I identify as
    [Show full text]
  • A Field Awaits Its Next Audience
    Victorian Paintings from London's Royal Academy: ” J* ml . ■ A Field Awaits Its Next Audience Peter Trippi Editor, Fine Art Connoisseur Figure l William Powell Frith (1819-1909), The Private View of the Royal Academy, 1881. 1883, oil on canvas, 40% x 77 inches (102.9 x 195.6 cm). Private collection -15- ALTHOUGH AMERICANS' REGARD FOR 19TH CENTURY European art has never been higher, we remain relatively unfamiliar with the artworks produced for the academies that once dominated the scene. This is due partly to the 20th century ascent of modernist artists, who naturally dis­ couraged study of the academic system they had rejected, and partly to American museums deciding to warehouse and sell off their academic holdings after 1930. In these more even-handed times, when seemingly everything is collectible, our understanding of the 19th century art world will never be complete if we do not look carefully at the academic works prized most highly by it. Our collective awareness is growing slowly, primarily through closer study of Paris, which, as capital of the late 19th century art world, was ruled not by Manet or Monet, but by J.-L. Gerome and A.-W. Bouguereau, among other Figure 2 Frederic Leighton (1830-1896) Study for And the Sea Gave Up the Dead Which Were in It: Male Figure. 1877-82, black and white chalk on brown paper, 12% x 8% inches (32.1 x 22 cm) Leighton House Museum, London Figure 3 Frederic Leighton (1830-1896) Elisha Raising the Son of the Shunamite Woman 1881, oil on canvas, 33 x 54 inches (83.8 x 137 cm) Leighton House Museum, London -16- J ! , /' i - / .
    [Show full text]
  • Mariana De John Everett Millais
    REVISTA CÍRCULO CROMÁTICO Notas de Historia del Arte y Pintura Mariana de John Everett William Shakespeare. En “Medida por medida” Shakespeare nos presenta a la Millais joven Mariana, cuya dote se pierde en un naufragio y provoca que su prometido se Celia Ramiro Chulvi1 niegue a casarse con ella. Abandonada por Universitat de València su amado Ángelo, se sume en la tristeza y la soledad, viviendo aislada en una pequeña casa granero. Si bien Mariana acaba obteniendo su final feliz en la historia de Shakespeare, a los prerrafaelitas les interesa mucho más el momento álgido de su dolor. Millais, en esta como en otras ocasiones, se inspira directamente en los versos del poeta Lord Tennyson. Este poeta escribe poesías a partir de obras anteriores como historias de Shakespeare o leyendas artúricas, dándole el ambiente lánguido característico del Prerrafaelismo. John Everett Millais, Mariana, 1851. She only said: “My life is dreary, Óleo sobre madera, 59.7 cm x 49.5 cm. Tate Britain Museum. He cometh not”, she said. She said: “I am aweary, aweary, 2 John Everett Millais, miembro I would that I were dead!”.4 fundador de la Hermandad Prerrafaelita,3 exhibía en 1851 esta obra cuya Tennyson nos ofrece una Mariana protagonista nace entre las páginas de triste, desesperanzada y nostálgica. Anhela 1 Graduada en Historia del Arte por la Universitat 3 Prettejohn, Elisabeth, The Art of the Pre- de València, España. Redactora en La Cámara del Raphaelites, Princeton University Press, Arte, web de Historia del Arte. Contacto: Princeton, 2000. [email protected] 4 Publicado en 1830 en Poems, Chiefly Lyrical.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood (PRB) Had Only Seven Members but Influenced Many Other Artists
    1 • Of course, their patrons, largely the middle-class themselves form different groups and each member of the PRB appealed to different types of buyers but together they created a stronger brand. In fact, they differed from a boy band as they created works that were bought independently. As well as their overall PRB brand each created an individual brand (sub-cognitive branding) that convinced the buyer they were making a wise investment. • Millais could be trusted as he was a born artist, an honest Englishman and made an ARA in 1853 and later RA (and President just before he died). • Hunt could be trusted as an investment as he was serious, had religious convictions and worked hard at everything he did. • Rossetti was a typical unreliable Romantic image of the artist so buying one of his paintings was a wise investment as you were buying the work of a ‘real artist’. 2 • The Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood (PRB) had only seven members but influenced many other artists. • Those most closely associated with the PRB were Ford Madox Brown (who was seven years older), Elizabeth Siddal (who died in 1862) and Walter Deverell (who died in 1854). • Edward Burne-Jones and William Morris were about five years younger. They met at Oxford and were influenced by Rossetti. I will discuss them more fully when I cover the Arts & Crafts Movement. • There were many other artists influenced by the PRB including, • John Brett, who was influenced by John Ruskin, • Arthur Hughes, a successful artist best known for April Love, • Henry Wallis, an artist who is best known for The Death of Chatterton (1856) and The Stonebreaker (1858), • William Dyce, who influenced the Pre-Raphaelites and whose Pegwell Bay is untypical but the most Pre-Raphaelite in style of his works.
    [Show full text]
  • Movimiento Prerrafaelista
    06/02/2007 1845 MOVIMIENTO PRERRAFAELISTA: ORÍGENES, DESARROLLO 1870 Y CONSECUENCIAS 1894 Sir John Everett Millais. John Ruskin. 1854 jamp'07 1 jamp'07 2 ALGUNAS OBRAS: Modern Painters (1843) Modern Painters II (1846) The Seven Lamps of Architecture (1849) Pre-Raphaelitism (1851) The Stones of Venice I (1851) The Stones of Venice II and III (1853) Architecture and Painting (1854) Modern Painters III (1856) The Harbours of England (1856) Political Economy of Art (1857) The Two Paths (1859) The Elements of Perspective (1859) Modern Painters IV (1860) RAFAEL (1483-1520): La Unto This Last (1862) Transfiguración 1518-20 jamp'07 3 jamp'07 4 The Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood was created in 1848 by seven artists: Dante Gabriel Rossetti, William Michael Rossetti, James Collinson, John Everett Millais, Frederic George Stephens, Thomas Woolner and William Holman Hunt. Their goal was to develop a naturalistic style of art, throwing The Pre-Pre-RaphaeliteRaphaelite away the rules and conventions that were drilled into students' BrotherhoodBrotherhood:: heads at the Academies. Raphael was the artist they considered to have achieved the highest degree of perfection, PRB so muchthttdth so that students were encourage dtdfd to draw from his examples rather than from nature itself; thus they became the "Pre-Raphaelites". The movement itself did not last past the 1850s, but the style remained popular for decades, influencing the Arts and Crafts Movement, the Symbolist painters and the Art Nouveau jamp'07 5 jamp'07 6 1 06/02/2007 El planteamiento inicial de
    [Show full text]
  • Hamlet on the Screen Prof
    Scholars International Journal of Linguistics and Literature Abbreviated Key Title: Sch Int J Linguist Lit ISSN 2616-8677 (Print) |ISSN 2617-3468 (Online) Scholars Middle East Publishers, Dubai, United Arab Emirates Journal homepage: https://saudijournals.com/sijll Review Article Hamlet on the Screen Prof. Essam Fattouh* English Department, Faculty of Arts, University of Alexandria (Egypt) DOI: 10.36348/sijll.2020.v03i04.001 | Received: 20.03.2020 | Accepted: 27.03.2020 | Published: 07.04.2020 *Corresponding author: Prof. Essam Fattouh Abstract The challenge of adapting William Shakespeare‟s Hamlet for the screen has preoccupied cinema from its earliest days. After a survey of the silent Hamlet productions, the paper critically examines Asta Nielsen‟s Hamlet: The Drama of Vengeance by noting how her main character is really a woman. My discussion of the modern productions of Shakespeare begins with a critical discussion of Lawrence Olivier‟s seminal production of 1948. The Russian Hamlet of 1964, directed by Grigori Kozintsev, is shown to combine a psychological interpretation of the hero without disregarding its socio-political context. The action-film genre deployed by Franco Zeffirelli in his 1990 adaptation of the play, through a moving performance by Mel Gibson, is analysed. Kenneth Branagh‟s ambitious and well-financed production of 1996 is shown to be somewhat marred by its excesses. Michael Almereyda‟s attempt to present Shakespeare‟s hero in a contemporary setting is shown to have powerful moments despite its flaws. The paper concludes that Shakespeare‟s masterpiece will continue to fascinate future generations of directors, actors and audiences. Keywords: Shakespeare – Hamlet – silent film – film adaptations – modern productions – Russian – Olivier – Branagh – contemporary setting.
    [Show full text]
  • GENDER STUDIES 19(1)/2020 1 10.2478/Genst-2021-0001
    GENDER STUDIES 19(1)/2020 10.2478/genst-2021-0001 SISTERS OF INSPIRATION. FROM SHAKESPEAREAN HEROINE TO PRE-RAPHAELITE MUSE DANA PERCEC West University of Timișoara [email protected] Abstract: The paper aims to make a connection between the female models of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood and the portrayal of Shakespearean heroines, given that the 19th-century school of painting was using the Bard not only as a source of legitimation and authority, but also as a source of displacement, tackling apparently universal and literary subjects that were in fact disturbing for the Victorian sensibilities, such as love and eroticism, neurosis and madness, or suicide. As more recent scholarship has revealed, the women behind the Brotherhood, while posing as passive and contemplative, objects on display for the public gaze, had more agency and mobility than the average Victorian women. Keywords: Pre-Raphaelite brotherhood, female models, Victorian sensibilities, Shakespearean heroines, sisterhood. 1. Introduction The Pre-Raphaelite movement has received a lot of critical attention both in artistic terms and in terms of the literary sources of inspiration this school of painting used. The founders, Dante Gabriel Rossetti, John Everett Millais, and William Holman Hunt were members of the same generation of young imaginative artists, but even half a century after the first PRB exhibition in 1848, a late Pre-Raphaelite like John William Waterhouse had the same technical and aesthetic approach. Escapist and nostalgic, the Pre-Raphaelite painting favours medieval settings, Biblical or mythological themes, lavish costumes and vivid colours. Above all, it brings to the forefront the female subject: beautiful young women in a melancholy pose, enigmatic and inactive, statuesque and aloof.
    [Show full text]
  • Ophelia's Death As Submission to the Feminine Element
    1 Rosalyn Stilling Drowning in Womanhood: Ophelia’s Death as Submission to the Feminine Element For Shakespearean heroines, a most fascinating, yet critically dismissed, character is Ophelia from Hamlet, the Danish prince Hamlet’s lover who goes mad and drowns after Hamlet murders her father. For generations, Ophelia has captivated artists, critics, poets, and musicians alike, who revive her spirit within their creative works, allowing the mystery and tragedy of her death to live on. Within the text, Ophelia struggles with womanly duty and obtained agency over her own life. She is constantly silenced and disregarded by the characters for no reason other than her youth and gender. No matter how she communicates, through words or physical symbols, she is misunderstood, ignored and called “mad,” which ultimately leads to her watery demise. Ophelia’s drowning is the consummate representation of an eternal retreat into the feminine, trading an individual voice for eternal silence in union with feminine essence. In turn, her death expresses the danger of reducing an individual to his or her gender and disregarding the voice of the marginalized. The silencing of Ophelia has surpassed her textual death given the amount of critics that see her as flat, under developed, and used only for emotional upheaval. A majority of Ophelia’s critical reception precipitates the quashing of her voice by disregarding her actions within the text. Critic Linda Welshimer Wagner critiques Ophelia’s character by stating, “It would appear that Ophelia has two primary purposes in her ingenuous role—that of providing a convenient hinge for several of Hamlet’s analytical scenes, and of providing […] emotional impact for the audience […] Apparently Shakespeare intended for her to be a minor character, using her sparingly and 2 almost forgetfully throughout the plot” (94).
    [Show full text]
  • Ruggeri's Amleto
    © Luke McKernan 2004 RUGGERO RUGGERI’S AMLETO Notre Dame Shakespeare Festival, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, USA 4 November 2004 Luke McKernan Of all the products of the first thirty years of cinema, when films were silent, perhaps none were so peculiar, so intriguing, and in their way so revealing of the temper of the medium in its formative years, as silent Shakespeare films. Shakespeare in the cinema is enough of a challenge for some people; what about Shakespeare on film when you can’t hear any of the words? The film you are to see this evening is one of two hundred or more Shakespeare films that were made in the silent period of cinema. You are seeing it because it has survived (when so many films from this time have not), because it is a rarity scarcely known even by those who are expert in this area, and because it is a good and interesting film. Not a great film, but arguably the best silent Shakespeare film that exists. It is certainly a film that needs to be much better known. To those who may never have seen a silent film before, be assured that even if you can’t hear the words you will be able to read them, as such films commonly have on-screen titles throughout, and in performance they were never silent as such in any case – for you had music. Silent Shakespeare I said that more than two hundred silent Shakespeare films were made, and that is true, but few of these were feature-length, that is, an hour or more, such as this evening’s attraction.
    [Show full text]
  • Metacriticism in Salman Rushdie's Short Story Yorick*
    Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi Hacettepe University Journal of Faculty of Letters Cilt/Volume: 35 Sayı/Number:1 Haziran/June 2018 doi:10.32600/huefd.438142 Metacriticism in Salman Rushdie’s Short Story Yorick* Salman Rushdie’nin Yorick Adlı Kısa Öyküsünde Üsteleştiri Seda ARIKAN** Abstract Salman Rushdie is mostly known for his usage of new techniques especially those of postmodernism. In his short story collection East, West, besides many postmodern techniques such as pastiche, parody, and metafiction, his focus on metacriticism is apparent in the short story titled “Yorick”. Rushdie’s “Yorick” that is based on an invented story about the character Yorick, the dead clown whose skull Prince Hamlet handles and makes his famous speech in Hamlet, appears as an example of creative metacriticism that depicts the place and function of literary criticism in a fictional work. Referring to theoretical criticisms of Hamlet, such as psychoanalysis and social theories, Rushdie uses criticism of literary criticism in his short story “Yorick”. Thus, he adds his postmodern interpretation into the analyses of literary criticism since antiquity. This study will firstly focus on the theoretical background of metacriticism, in general, and creative metacritcism, in particular. Later on, it will try to find out the traces of creative metacriticism in Rushdie’s short story “Yorick” in which he also deals with metafiction, the role of the writer, the function of the reader, writer- critic-reader collaboration, the objectivity or subjectivity of literary criticism, creative writing or creative reading, and the truth in storytelling. Analysing how metacriticism operates in the story, finally Rushdie’s ideas on what literary criticism is and should be will be clarified.
    [Show full text]
  • Identity and Role-Playing in Shakespeare's Hamlet
    The Mask of Madness: Identity and Role-playing in Shakespeare’s Hamlet Treball de Fi de Grau Grau en Estudis Anglesos Supervisor: Dr Jordi Coral Escola Anna Fluvià Sabio June 2016 Acknowledgments Throughout the writing of this TFG, I have benefited from the advice of Dr Jordi Coral Escola. I am very grateful for his constant support, suggestions and corrections. I would also like to thank my family and friends for having been extremely supportive and encouraging during this process. Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 2 Madness as a Key Theme in Elizabethan Drama.......................................................... 3 The Spanish Tragedy and Hamlet ................................................................................. 4 Chapter 1: Madness .......................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Origins of his Madness ........................................................................................... 6 1.2 Assuming the Role of the Madman ...................................................................... 10 Chapter 2: Theatricality .................................................................................................. 13 2.1 Hamlet’s Role ....................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Metadramatic Elements in the Play .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Raphaelites and the Book
    Pre-Raphaelites and the Book February 17 – August 4, 2013 National Gallery of Art Pre-Raphaelites and the Book Many artists of the Pre-Raphaelite circle were deeply engaged with integrating word and image throughout their lives. John Everett Millais and Edward Burne-Jones were sought-after illustrators, while Dante Gabriel Rossetti devoted himself to poetry and the visual arts in equal measure. Intensely attuned to the visual and the liter- ary, William Morris became a highly regarded poet and, in the last decade of his life, founded the Kelmscott Press to print books “with the hope of producing some which would have a definite claim to beauty.” He designed all aspects of the books — from typefaces and ornamental elements to layouts, where he often incorporated wood- engraved illustrations contributed by Burne-Jones. The works on display here are drawn from the National Gallery of Art Library and from the Mark Samuels Lasner Collection, on loan to the University of Delaware Library. front cover: William Holman Hunt (1827 – 1910), proof print of illustration for “The Lady of Shalott” in Alfred Tennyson, Poems, London: Edward Moxon, 1857, wood engraving, Mark Samuels Lasner Collection, on loan to the University of Delaware Library (9) back cover: Dante Gabriel Rossetti (1828 – 1882), proof print of illustration for “The Palace of Art” in Alfred Tennyson, Poems, London: Edward Moxon, 1857, wood engraving, Mark Samuels Lasner Collection, on loan to the University of Delaware Library (10) inside front cover: John Everett Millais, proof print of illustration for “Irene” in Cornhill Magazine, 1862, wood engraving, Mark Samuels Lasner Collection, on loan to the University of Delaware Library (11) Origins of Pre-Raphaelitism 1 Carlo Lasinio (1759 – 1838), Pitture a Fresco del Campo Santo di Pisa, Florence: Presso Molini, Landi e Compagno, 1812, National Gallery of Art Library, A.W.
    [Show full text]