SHA Corridor Improvement Strategy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SHA Corridor Improvement Strategy Issues, Opportunities, and Strategies US 1 Corridor Improvement Strategy Howard County, Maryland Submitted To: Maryland State Highway Administration Office of Planning and Preliminary Engineering Regional and Intermodal Planning Division 707 North Calvert Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202 Howard County 3430 Court House Drive Ellicott City, Maryland 21043 Prepared By: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 36 South Charles Street Suite 1920 Baltimore, Maryland 21201 Mahan Rykiel Associates, Inc. 800 Wyman Park Drive Suite 310 Baltimore, Maryland 21211 SHA Project No. HO332B11 KAI Project No. 7069 February 2008 This page intentionally left blank. Howard County US 1 Corridor Improvement Strategy Consultant Team Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Yolanda Takesian Elizabeth Wemple Project Manager Patrick McMahon Brandon Nevers Erin Ferguson Assistant Project Manager Caroline Swartz Kate Sylvester Mahan Rykiel Charlie Bailey Ryan Johnson Maryland State Highway Administration Office of Planning and Preliminary District 7 Engineering George Miller Raja Veeramachaneni John Concannon Dan Doherty Dave Coyne Harriet Levine, Jacobs Mark Crampton (SHA consultant, Project Manager) Vaughn Lewis Office of Highway Development L’Kiesha Markley Dennis German Barry Keidrouski Office of Traffic and Safety Randy Gray Ben Myrick Eric Tabacek Howard County Department of Planning & Zoning Department of Public Works Marsha McLaughlin Jim Irvin Carl Balser Mark DeLuca Dace Blaumanis Ron Lepson Randy Clay Steve Sharar Elmina Hilsenrath Steve Lafferty Brian Muldoon Economic Development Authority Ben Pickar Jack Gunther Advisory Committee Jeff Conley Valerie McGuire Don Darnall David Meiners M. Patrick Dougal Lora Muchmore Ann Ferro Pamela Peseux Carol Filipczak Myra Phelps Jeff Gould Mike Russo Eleanor Gyr Arnold Sagner Ed Huber John Sindler Howard Johnson Edward Stollof Peter Laport David Theilman John Liparini Walter Townshend Chris McCahan US 1 Corridor Improvement Strategy Issues, Opportunities & Strategies February 2008 Table of Contents Route 1 Corridor Study Area Zoning ................................................................................................vi Executive Summary............................................................................................................ 1 Document Overview ......................................................................................................................... 2 PART I Refining the Vision................................................................................................ 9 A. Future Traffic Operations ............................................................................................ 13 Purpose .......................................................................................................................................... 13 Key Findings ................................................................................................................................... 13 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 14 Analysis .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Preliminary Build Options ............................................................................................................... 25 B. Development Trends and Multimodal Travel............................................................. 41 Purpose .......................................................................................................................................... 41 Key Findings ................................................................................................................................... 41 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 42 Analysis .......................................................................................................................................... 42 C. Speed Management...................................................................................................... 59 Purpose .......................................................................................................................................... 59 Key Findings ................................................................................................................................... 59 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 59 Analysis .......................................................................................................................................... 59 D. Safety Analysis............................................................................................................. 67 Purpose .......................................................................................................................................... 67 Key Findings ................................................................................................................................... 67 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 67 Analysis .......................................................................................................................................... 69 E. Major Spot Concepts.................................................................................................... 77 Purpose .......................................................................................................................................... 77 Key Findings ................................................................................................................................... 77 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 79 Analysis .......................................................................................................................................... 79 Page i . US 1 Corridor Improvement Strategy February 2008 Issues, Opportunities & Strategies PART II Tools to Implement the Vision .................................................................... 97 F. Development Review.................................................................................................. 101 Purpose.........................................................................................................................................101 Key Findings .................................................................................................................................101 Methodology .................................................................................................................................102 Analysis.........................................................................................................................................102 G. Access Management Analysis.................................................................................. 115 Purpose.........................................................................................................................................115 Key Findings .................................................................................................................................115 Methodology .................................................................................................................................116 Analysis.........................................................................................................................................116 H. Roadway Character and Functional Classification Analysis ................................. 123 Purpose.........................................................................................................................................123 Key Findings .................................................................................................................................123 Methodology .................................................................................................................................124 Analysis.........................................................................................................................................124 I. Typical Sections and Right-of-Way............................................................................ 131 Purpose.........................................................................................................................................131 Key Findings .................................................................................................................................131 Methodology .................................................................................................................................131 Analysis.........................................................................................................................................132 J. Network Connections................................................................................................. 143 Purpose.........................................................................................................................................143
Recommended publications
  • NEW Service Routes Begin: Sunday May 5, 2019
    ➤PLEASE TAKE ONE! NEW Service Routes Begin: Sunday May 5, 2019 Expanded Service, Shorter Ride Times, Improved Connections! Changes will affect the following routes: 401, 402 A/B, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 414 and 501 STAY INFORMED! Go to www.transitRTA.com/NewRoutes for new route information including maps, timetables and outreach locations. Follow Us @transitRTA for important notifications concerning service updates. Want to order tickets and passes? Visit www.transitRTA.com/fares. For Real-Time Bus Information, download our FREE Mobile App, RouteShout 2.02.0. A Message From Your Howard County Executive Howard County is one of best places in the nation to live, work, and play. To maintain this standing, we must always be moving forward and looking to improve. It is imperative that every neighborhood has access to reliable and efficient public transportation. To achieve this goal, we are improving RTA bus services with the first ever, major realignment. The new service route changes will begin on Sunday, May 5th, 2019. We adjusted schedules to shorten wait times between buses and eliminated 2-hour frequencies. All buses will now operate on 30-minute or one-hour intervals. We added new or expanded service on Sunday routes. We have also added three new routes to allow for more efficient rides with shorter travel times. We streamlined routes and schedules to make them easier to understand. And our residents over 60 years old and those with disabilities will still be able to ride fixed-route buses for free, system wide. All these changes will make riding RTA more convenient, more reliable, and more efficient.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Laurel Master Plan
    City of Laurel Master Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies ADOPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF LAUREL July 25, 2016 – ORDINANCE NO. 1873 8103 SANDY SPRING ROAD LAUREL, MARYLAND CITY OF LAUREL Mayor: Craig A. Moe City Council: H. Edward Ricks, President Michael R. Leszcz, President Pro Tem Valerie M. A. Nicholas, First Ward Donna L. Crary, Second Ward Frederick Smalls, Second Ward In Conjunction With the Planning Commission Mitzi R Betman, Chairwoman John R. Kish, Vice Chairman Frederick Smalls, Ex-Officio Member Bill Wellford Donald E. Williford G. Rick Wilson And the Master Plan Review Committee Richard Armstrong Pam Brown Toni Drake Samuel Epps Roy P. Gilmore Douglas Hayes Steve Meyerer Luther Roberts G. Rick Wilson July 25, 2016 1 ABSTRACT Title City of Laurel Master Plan Author: Department of Economic and Community Development Maps: Department of Information Technology Subject: Master Plan for the City of Laurel. Elements include land use, municipal growth, community facilities, water resources, public safety, transportation, recreation, sensitive areas, and implementation. Date: July 25, 2016 Abstract: This document sets forth recommendations for the future development and growth of the City. Specific recommendations are made for the many elements integral to the functioning of the City including land use proposals, transportation concerns, capital improvements and the physical and living environments. The focus of the document is to provide a long- range plan for the retention of the traditional characteristics of Laurel with the integration of future land use development. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 1873 AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE AND ADOPT A MASTER PLAN FOR THE CITY OF LAUREL Sponsored by the President at the request of the Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes (Approved) Legislative Public Hearing January 16, 2018, 6:00 P.M
    COUNCILMEMBERS Mary Kay Sigaty, Chairperson District 4 Calvin Ball, Vice Chairperson District 2 Howard County Council Jon Weinstein District 1 George Howard Building 3430 Court House Drive Jen Terrasa District 3 Ellicott City, Maryland 21043-4392 Greg Fox District 5 Minutes (Approved) Legislative Public Hearing January 16, 2018, 6:00 p.m. Banneker Room Members Present: Mary Kay Sigaty, Council Chairperson; Calvin Ball, Vice Chairperson; Greg Fox, Council Member; Jennifer Terrasa, Council Member; and Jon Weinstein, Council Member. Staff Present: Jessica Feldmark, Administrator; Jennifer Sager, Administration; Theo Wimberly, Legislative Analyst; Craig Glendenning, County Auditor; John Gwynn, Assistant County Solicitor; and Kel Habicht, Administrative Support. I. Call to Order at 6:04 p.m. II. Pledge of Allegiance led by pack 874 and Pack 618. III. Allow the reading of bills by short title. Mary Kay Sigaty, Chairperson moved to approve to allow the reading of bills by short title, seconded by Calvin Ball, Vice Chairperson. The motion carried as follows AYES: Mary Kay Sigaty, Council Chairperson; Calvin Ball, Council Vice Chairperson; Greg Fox, Council Member; Jen Terrasa, Council Member; and Jon Weinstein, Council Member IV. Legislation - Public Hearing A. Appointments 1. The Administrator read Council Resolutions 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, and 7-2018 together. • Council Resolution 1-2018 - A RESOLUTION confirming the reappointment of Nancy A. Briguglio to the Equal Business Opportunity Commission. (No expiration date.) • Council Resolution 2-2018 - A RESOLUTION confirming the reappointment of Samuel P. Buma to the Plumbing Advisory Board. (No expiration date.) • Council Resolution 3-2018 - A RESOLUTION confirming the reappointment of Christine E.
    [Show full text]
  • Feedback Summary
    Summary of Participant Input and Comment Maryland City Maryland City at Russett Library May 29, 2019 Total attendees: 12 Activity 1: SAP/GDP Recommendation Dot Exercise Land Use and Zoning: Rank Order Votes Received Jessup/Maryland City SAP 2019 Status and 1 234 5 N/A Total Recommendation Explanation Votes Received D.C. Children’s Center property: This Not Implemented. This site 0 0 2 1 0 1 4 property consisting of over 650 acres is still currently owned by is currently the site of the Oak Hill the United States Detention Center which is owned by Government. the U.S. Department of Interior and leased by the District of Columbia. It is uncertain as to how long the District plans to continue operation of this facility, although no definite plans to close the facility have been announced to date. Should the facility cease operation in the future and the opportunity for acquisition and development arise, the County should explore the potential uses for the site and promote opportunities that would serve some of the regional needs in this part of the County. Area residents have expressed a desire and need for educational opportunities, such as a community college, and a regional park with active recreational uses to serve the residents in the western part of the County. If the property is acquired by a private interest, the developer should be encouraged to explore the benefits of providing a mix of employment, retail, and residential uses as well as other uses such as educational or recreational uses that would serve the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Expressions of Interest
    Questions regarding an Award? CURRENT AWARDS Email us at [email protected] HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND or call us at 410-313-6370 May 20, 2021 REGISTERED SOLICITATION BID TITLE COMPANY(IES) AWARDED LOCAL ANNUAL TOTAL P.O. $ AMOUNT NO. BUSINESS EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST Consultant Services for Blandair Regional Park, EOI-17-2007 Whitman, Requardt & Associates, LLP No $15,346.00 Engineering, Architectural and Landscape Services Environmental Consultant Services for Deep Run EOI-26-2013 KCI Technologies, Inc. $34,621.62 Shallow Run Interceptors Improvements - Phase IIB Consultant Services for Whiskey Bottom Road EOI-32-2013 Water Pump Station Replacement, Phase 3 - Hazen and Sawyer, PC No $337,533.27 Construction Phase Services RRMM Architects, PC, DBA RRMM Lukmire No $5,101,500.00 Architects Grimm & Parker Architecture, Inc. No $750,000.00 EOI-02-2017 Architectural Services for a Variety of Building Types Whitman, Requardt & Associates, LLP No $750,000.00 Bignell Watkins Hasser Architects, PC No $750,000.00 Quinn Evans Architects, Inc. No $1,750,000.00 Whitman, Requardt & Associates, LLP No $3,000,000.00 George, Miles & Buhr, LLC No $3,000,000.00 Water and Wastewater Facilities Engineering EOI-03-2017 GHD, Inc. No $3,000,000.00 Design Services (WWFEDS) HDR Engineering, Inc. No $3,000,000.00 Rummel, Klepper & Kahl No $3,000,000.00 KCI Technologies, Inc. No $4,000,000.00 Biohabitats Inc./Century Engineering Stormwater and Watershed Management Evaluation No $4,000,000.00 EOI-04-2017 Biohabitats/Century Engineering JV and Design Services McCormick Taylor, Inc. No $4,000,000.00 Stantec - Straughan JV No $4,000,000.00 Gannett Fleming, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Howard County Council District 3 George Howard Building Mary Kay Sigaty 3430 Court House Drive District 4 Ellicott City, Maryland 21043-4392 Greg Fox District 5
    COUNCILMEMBERS Calvin Ball, Chairperson District 2 Jon Weinstein, Vice Chairperson District 1 Jennifer Terrasa Howard County Council District 3 George Howard Building Mary Kay Sigaty 3430 Court House Drive District 4 Ellicott City, Maryland 21043-4392 Greg Fox District 5 Minutes (approved) Special Public Hearing – Downtown Columbia July 14, 2016, 6:00 p.m. Banneker Room Members Present: Calvin Ball, Council Chairperson; Jon Weinstein, Vice Chairperson; Greg Fox, Council Member; Mary Kay Sigaty, Council Member; and Jennifer Terrasa, Council Member. Staff Present: Jessica Feldmark, Administrator; Jennifer Sager, Administration; Craig Glendenning, County Auditor; Jeff Meyers, Legislative Analyst, Theo Wimberly, Legislative Analyst; Gary Kuc County Solicitor; and Jennifer Egan, Administrative Support. I. Call to Order 6:05 p.m. II. Pledge of Allegiance by Vice Chairperson Weinstein III. Public Testimony on Legislation Regarding Downtown Columbia a. Michelle Wood, Hickory Ridge Village Board, 6263 Golden Hook, Columbia Maryland b. Linda Wengel, Town Center Village Board, 5430 Vantage Point Road, Columbia, Maryland 1001 Governor Warfield Parkway, Columbia, Maryland c. Lada Onyshkevych Wilde Lake Middle School PTSA, 6200 Bright Plume, Columbia, Maryland d. Susan Garber - 9100 Gorman Road, Laurel, Maryland e. Danylo Leshchyshyn - 6200 Bright Plume, Columbia, Maryland f. Stu Kohn, HCCA, 8709 Yellow Bird Court, Laurel, Maryland g. Lillie Gallant, President, League of Women Voters Howard County, 6400 Enchanted Solitude Place, Columbia, Maryland h. Michele Whelley, Interim Executive Director, Downtown Columbia Partnership, 368 Homeland Southway, Baltimore, Maryland i. Joanne Davis, DCACC - Merriweather Post Pavilion, 10323 Wilde Lake Terrace, Columbia, Maryland j. Ian Kennedy, Executive Director of DCACC- Merriweather, Co-Founder SaveMerriweather and Housing Commission, 6174 Clearsmoke Court, Columbia, Maryland k.
    [Show full text]
  • Howard County Council
    COUNCILMEMBERS Jennifer Terrasa, Chairperson Howard County Council District 3 George Howard Building Mary Kay Sigaty, Vice Chairperson 3528 Court House Drive District 4 Ellicott City, Maryland 21043-4392 Courtney Watson District 1 Calvin Ball District 2 Greg Fox District 5 _March 11, 2013 Glenna and Gary Hurst, Trustees 24724 New Post Road Saint Michaels, MD 21663-2308 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Hurst: You are receiving this letter because you filed a Zoning Map Amendtnent Request Form/Howard County Comprehensive Zoning Plan or a Zoning Regulation Amendment Request Form/Howard County Comprehensive Plan. Please be advised that on March 7, 2013, the Howard County Ethics Commission determined. that the Zoning Map Request Form needs to be accompanied by certain affidavits and disclosures. The Commission also dete1mined that the Zoning Regulation Amendment Form needs to be accompanied by certain affidavits and disclosures when the-Form proposes to "increase the density of the land of the applicant." The Cotnmission directed me to notify applicants of their obligation to file the affidavit and disclosure. The obligation is set forth in Md. Code Ann., St. Gov't, Sec. 15-849(b), which provides in part, "the affidavit or disclosure shall be filed at least 30 calendar days prior to any consideration of the application by an elected official." Accordingly, I am enclosing for your use the approved affidavit packet. Completed forms may be mailed to the Adtninistrative Assistant to the Zoning Board at 3430 Court House Drive, Ellicott City, MD 21043. Very tluly
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2021 Capital Budget OFFICE of the COUNTY AUDITOR
    Auditor’s Summary of the Proposed Howard County FY 2021 Capital Budget OFFICE OF THE COUNTY AUDITOR Craig Glendenning, CPA County Auditor M E M O R A N D U M April 18, 2020 MEMO TO: Council Members FROM: Craig Glendenning County Auditor SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE’S PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2021 CAPITAL BUDGET The Executive’s Proposed Fiscal Year 2021 Capital Budget (excluding the Water and Sewer projects) is $242.2 million, which represents an increase of $69.6 million (or 40.3 percent) more than the FY 2020 Approved Capital Budget of $172.6 million. New Funding Sources: One of the reasons for the large increase in the FY 2021 Capital Budget request are new funding sources: Other General Obligation Bonds (Other GO): These are General Obligation bonds that are supported by 4 dedicated revenue streams, totaling $82.3 million of FY 2021 requested appropriation. Attachment 14 provides the projects that have proposed appropriation of Other GO bonds, as well as the revenue stream that will fund the debt service. NOTE: Per the Administration, “all GO bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the County. All loans, borrowings, and liabilities are reported to the credit agencies.” George Howard Building, 3430 Court House Drive, Ellicott City, Maryland 21043-4392 (410) 313-2005 TTY Number: (410) 313-6401 Fax Number: (410) 313-3287 https://cc.howardcountymd.gov/ 1 Other GO Bonds - Columbia TIF Second Set-Aside Incremental Tax Revenues: This is a revenue stream that is a result of incremental tax revenue from the Downtown Columbia TIF District.
    [Show full text]