DOCSLIB.ORG

A Report on Bill C-7 by Catherine Mathie September 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Report on Bill C-7 by Catherine Mathie September 2020 ©deVeber Institute 2020 A Report on Bill C-7 By Catherine Mathie September 2020 INTRODUCTION In September 2019, the Quebec Superior Court decision Truchon c. Procureur Général du Canada ruled that Canada’s restriction of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide to people whose natural death was “reasonably foreseeable” was unconstitutional.1 This restriction was part of the original regime of “Medical Assistance in Dying” (MAID) introduced to Canadian law when Parliament passed Bill C-14 to amend the Criminal Code in June 2016.2 Bill C-14 was itself a response to a prior court decision: the Supreme Court of Canada’s 2015 ruling in Carter v. Canada (Attorney General) had struck down Canada’s previous absolute ban on euthanasia.3 Despite the fact that the “reasonably foreseeable” death provision had been invalidated by a court in Quebec whose jurisdiction over federal law did not extend outside of the province, the federal government responded as if the decision had settled the constitutional doctrine that euthanasia must be extended to those who are not dying if their suffering is grievous and irremediable. In January 2020, the federal government confirmed that it would not attempt to defend Bill C-14 by bringing an appeal of Truchon to the Supreme Court of Canada, and it would instead respond by introducing “updates” to expand MAID.4 With the official announcement that it had “accepted the ruling” and was “committed to changing the MAID law for the whole country,” the Government launched a short public consultation process: Canadians at large were given a 14-day period to respond to an online survey posing a list of questions concerned with the updates under consideration, while Government ministers met with experts 1 Truchon c. Procureur Général du Canada, 2019 QCCS 3792. Case references appearing in this paper are to the official English translation of the decision. 2 Bill C-14, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and to make related amendments to other Acts (medical assistance in dying), 1st Sess., 42nd Parl., 2016 (assented to 17 June 2016). 3 Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5, [2015] 1 SCR 331. 4 Department of Justice Canada. (2020, January 13). Government of Canada consults Canadians on medical assistance in dying [News release]. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/department- justice/news/2020/01/government-of-canada-consults-canadians-on-medical-assistance-in-dying.html 1 ©deVeber Institute 2020 and stakeholders to discuss MAID changes at a series of closed-door meetings held in January and February in cities around the country. On February 24, the Government tabled Bill C-7 in Parliament, introducing a legislative revision and expansion of Canada’s regime of physician- assisted death which goes significantly beyond expanding MAID to cases where the recipient is not dying.5 The proposed legislation also sets aside safeguards established by Bill C-14 and introduces the possibility for some people who are no longer capable of giving consent at the time arranged for their death to be euthanized according to the terms of a prior agreement. The Bill completed first reading on February 24, but debate at its second reading was first interrupted due to Parliament’s reduced sitting due to the COVID-19 pandemic and then by the prorogation of Parliament that is now in effect until September 23, 2020. Before the interruption, two days of debate were held in the House of Commons on February 25 and 26.6 The government has received approval for a second suspension of the Truchon decision, which will end on December 18, 2020, at which time, a revised law will have to be in place.7 However, the future of debates over Bill C-7 is likely to be further complicated by the fact that June 2020 was mandated by Bill C-14 as the month when Parliament would begin a 5-year review of that law and the state of palliative care in Canada. June has come and gone without any announcements about the statutory review, and now it cannot commence before September. However, when (or if) the House of Commons returns to its deliberations over Bill C-7 in the fall, these will occur at the same period when Parliament is required be taking up a separate review of existing MAID law. CURRENT LAW ON EUTHANASIA AND ASSISTED DEATH In Canada’s Criminal Code, it is an indictable offense to aid a person to die by suicide.8 However, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in Carter v. Canada that this provision is unconstitutional and void to the extent that it prohibits “physician-assisted death for a competent 5 Bill C-7, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying), 1st Sess., 43rd Parl., 2020. 6 Canada, Parliament. House of Commons Debates, Vol. 129, Number 024 (February 26, 2020). https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/43-1/house/sitting-24/hansard Canada, Parliament. House of Commons Debates, Vol. 129, Number 025 (February 27, 2020). https://www.ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer/en/43-1/house/sitting-25/hansard 7 Health Canada. (2020). First Annual Report on Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada, 2019. p. 42. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/hc-sc/documents/services/medical-assistance-dying-annual- report-2019/maid-annual-report-eng.pdf 8 Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c. C-46. s. 241(1)(a)-(b). 2 ©deVeber Institute 2020 adult person who (1) clearly consents to the termination of life; and (2) has a grievous and irremediable medical condition (including an illness, disease or disability) that causes enduring suffering that is intolerable to the individual in the circumstances of his or her condition.”9 The Court argued that by prohibiting physicians from aiding in the deaths of such adults, the law unjustifiably infringed upon the latter’s’ Charter rights to life, liberty and security of the person.10 In response to this ruling, Parliament passed Bill C-14 in 2016, introducing amendments to the Criminal Code that exempt certain people from an indictment for assisting a suicide if the medical actions or aid they provide to cause a person’s death amount to the provision of “medical assistance in dying” to that person.11 To the extent that euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide differ, MAID under Bill C-14 can take either form: death may be deliberately caused to eligible adults through a lethal substance being directly administered to them by a medical or nurse practitioner, or being prescribed or provided to them for self- administration.12 To be eligible for such “assistance,” the person in question must be at least 18 years old and capable of medical decision-making, eligible for government-funded medical care in Canada, and have “a grievous and irremediable medical condition,” make a voluntary request for MAID not due to external pressure, and give informed consent to MAID “after having been informed of the means… available to relieve their suffering, including palliative care.”13 In order to define the grievous and irremediable medical condition that could make a person eligible for euthanasia, Bill C-14 introduced four criteria: one must have “a serious and incurable illness, disease or disability;” be “in an advanced state of irreversible decline in capability;” endure “physical or psychological suffering that is intolerable to them and that cannot be relieved under conditions that they consider acceptable;” and face a totality of medical 9 Carter v Canada (Attorney General), at para. 127. 10 The Supreme Court accepted the trial court’s view that the prohibition “deprives some individuals of life” by imposing on them an “increased risk of death” by forcing some “individuals to take their own lives prematurely, for fear that they would be incapable of doing so when they reached the point where suffering was intolerable” (at paras. 62, 57-58.) The Supreme Court also found that liberty and security of the person were violated by the prohibition insofar as it deprived them of the “individual autonomy and dignity” to retain “control over their bodily integrity” and make unimpeded “important medical decisions for themselves” representing “their deeply personal response to serious pain and suffering” (at para. 64). 11 Criminal Code, s. 241(2)-(7). 12 Criminal Code, s. 241.1(a)-(b). 13 Criminal Code, s. 241.2(1)(a)-(e). 3 ©deVeber Institute 2020 circumstances that indicate that “natural death has become reasonably foreseeable,” though not necessarily in terms of a specific timeframe.14 To mitigate the risks that MAID deaths might occur in cases where patients have not freely chosen them or no longer choose them at the time their lives are ended, there are a number of “safeguards” and restrictions included in Bill C-14.15 One of the most important seeks to ensure that MAID is only provided to patients who consent at the time their death is caused by requiring the practitioner who administers the lethal substance to them to provide them with a final “opportunity to withdraw their request” immediately before the procedure, “and ensure that the person gives express consent,” taking “all necessary measures to provide a reliable means” for those with difficulty communicating to “understand the information that is provided to them and communicate their decision.”16 If a person is incapable of providing their informed consent at the time of the procedure, Bill C-14 does not permit action to be taken to cause the death. Although Bill C-14 was the fruit of Parliament’s deliberations at the time, it took a less permissive approach to the legalization of euthanasia than was called for by some in Parliament. As an early step in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parliamentary Internship Programme 2020-21 Annual Report
    Parliamentary Internship Programme 2020-21 Annual Report Annual General Meeting Canadian Political Science Association June 11, 2021 Dr. Paul Thomas Director Web: pip-psp.org Twitter: @PIP_PSP Instagram: @pip-psp Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ParlInternship/ PIP Annual Report 2021 Director’s Message I am delighted to present the Parliamentary Internship Programme’s (PIP) 2020-21 Annual Report to the Canadian Political Science Association (CPSA). The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically reshaped the experience of the 2020-21 internship cohort relative to previous years. Such changes began with a mostly-virtual orientation in September, and continued with remote work in their MP placements, virtual study tours, and Brown-Bag lunches over Zoom. Yet while limiting some aspects of the PIP experience, the pandemic provided opportunities as well. The interns took full advantage of the virtual format to meet with academics, politicians, and other public figures who were inaccessible to previous cohorts relying on in-person meetings. They also learned new skills for online engagement that will serve them well in the hybrid work environment that is emerging as COVID-19 recedes. One thing the pandemic could not change was the steadfast support of the PIP’s various partners. We are greatly indebted to our sponsors who chose to prioritize their contributions to PIPs despite the many pressures they faced. In addition to their usual responsibilities for the Programme, both the PIP’s House of Commons Liasion, Scott Lemoine, and the Programme Assistant, Melissa Carrier, also worked tirelessly to ensure that the interns were kept up to date on the changing COVID guidance within the parliamentary preccinct, and to ensure that they had access to the resources they needed for remote work.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF for Liberal Party of Canada
    REGULATED FUNDRAISING EVENT REPORT Section A – Party information Party's full name Liberal Party of Canada Chief agent's full name The Federal Liberal Agency of Canada Section B – Event information Event held during a general election period Yes No Event date yyyy/mm/dd 2019/09/17 Event start time 6:00 PM Event name An Evening with the Hon. David Lametti and Marc Miller Venue name Buffet Roma City Saint-Léonard Prov./Terr. QC Postal code H1R 2S4 Section C – Contribution or payment amount Amount of contributions required to have been made to attend the event $ 0-500 Amount required to have been paid to attend the event, part of which was a contribution $ 500 Section D – Beneficiaries Entity A – Registered party B – Registered association C – Nomination contestant D – Candidate E – Leadership contestant Full name Ville-Marie -- Le Sud-Ouest -- Ile-des-Soeurs Federal Liberal Association Entity Full name Entity Full name Entity Full name Entity Section E – Prominent attendees Position: A – Party leader B – Party interim leader C – Leadership contestant D – Cabinet minister Full name David Lametti Position Full name Position Full name Position Full name Position Full name Position Section F – Organizers Full name Ville-Marie -- Le Sud-Ouest -- Ile-des-Soeurs Federal Liberal Association Full name Full name Full name Full name Section G – Privacy notice Personal information in this Regulated Fundraising Event Report (Report) is collected for the administration of the political financing requirements as set out in the Canada Elections Act (Act). This information may be shared with the Commissioner of Canada Elections to ensure that the Act is complied with and enforced.
    [Show full text]
  • What the Questionnaire for Federal Judicial Appointments Reveals About the Pursuit of Justice, Diversity, and the Commitment to Transparency
    Dalhousie Law Journal Volume 43 Issue 1 Article 9 2020 Popping the Question: What the Questionnaire for Federal Judicial Appointments Reveals about the Pursuit of Justice, Diversity, and the Commitment to Transparency Agathon Fric Harvard Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/dlj Part of the Common Law Commons, Courts Commons, and the Judges Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Recommended Citation Agathon Fric, "Popping the Question: What the Questionnaire for Federal Judicial Appointments Reveals about the Pursuit of Justice, Diversity, and the Commitment to Transparency" (2020) 43:1 Dal LJ 159. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Schulich Law Scholars. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dalhousie Law Journal by an authorized editor of Schulich Law Scholars. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Agathon Fric* Popping the Question: What the Questionnaire for Federal Judicial Appointments Reveals about the Pursuit of Justice, Diversity, and the Commitment to Transparency Since 2017, the Canadian government has published excerpts from questionnaires that prospective judges completed as part of the judicial selection process, subjecting newly appointed superior and federal court judges to a degree of scrutiny that is unprecedented in Canadian history. Using this novel source material, this article explores what a sample of 16 judges’ questionnaires do and do not say about the individuals behind the robes. This review suggests that those appointed to the bench in 2017 generally demonstrate insight into the judicial role in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • December 17, 2019 the Right Honourable Justin Trudeau P.C
    December 17, 2019 The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau P.C., M.P. Prime Minister of Canada and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs Langevin Block Ottawa, ON, K1A 0A2 Dear Prime Minister, Congratulations on your re-election to the House of Commons and your swearing-in as Prime Minister of Canada. I write to you on behalf of Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights – formerly Planned Parenthood Canada – a progressive, pro-choice charitable organization committed to advancing and upholding sexual and reproductive health and rights in Canada and globally. As you begin your second mandate as Prime Minister, we urge you to take action on the following issues which require coordination across ministries: 1. Address uneven access to abortion care across the country – including by enforcing the Canada Health Act We were pleased to hear your commitments to address persisting barriers regarding abortion access across the country, including in New Brunswick. Access to abortion remains a serious concern for many across the country. Only one hospital in six offers abortion in Canada. Unnecessarily rules and regulations at provincial and territorial levels, or within regional health systems and hospital settings, prevent access. Many people seeking care have to travel large distances to access abortion, and often must travel to the US for abortion services post-23 weeks, face interference and intimidation from anti-choice organizations and activists that often mislead, confuse, and delay individuals seeking an abortion, or experience harassment, threats, violence, and intimidation from anti-choice protesters outside of sexual health clinics and hospitals which provide abortion. Your urgent action is required to address the discriminatory regulation 84-20 of New Brunswick’s Medical Services Payment Act.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Canadian Federal Dynamic What Does It Mean for Canada-US Relations? Canada’S Political Spectrum
    The New Canadian Federal Dynamic What does it mean for Canada-US Relations? Canada’s Political Spectrum Leader: Justin Trudeau Interim Leader: Rona Leader: Thomas Mulcair Ambrose Party Profile: Social Party Profile: Populist, liberal policies, historically Party Profile: Social democratic fiscally responsible liberal/conservative, socialist/union roots fiscally pragmatic Supporter Base: Urban Supporter Base: Canada, Atlantic Supporter Base: Quebec, Urban Canada Provinces Suburbs, rural areas, Western provinces Leader: Elizabeth May Leader: Vacant Party Profile: Non-violence, social Party Profile: Protect/Defend justice and sustainability Quebec interests, independence Supporter Base: British Supporter Base: Urbana & rural Columbia, Atlantic Provinces Quebec Left Leaning Right Leaning 2 In Case You Missed It... Seats: 184 Seats: 99 Seats: 44 Popular Vote: 39.5% Popular Vote: 31.9% Popular Vote: 19.7% • Swept Atlantic Canada • Continue to dominate in the • Held rural Québec • Strong showing in Urban Prairies, but support in urban • Performed strongly across Canada – Ontario, Québec, and centres is cracking Vancouver Island and coastal B.C. B.C. 3 Strong National Mandate Vote Driven By • Longest campaign period in Canadian history – 78 Days • Increase in 7% in voter turnout • “Change” sentiment, positive messaging…. sound familiar? 4 The Liberal Government The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau Prime Minister “…a Cabinet that looks like Canada”. • 30 Members, 15 women • 2 aboriginal • 5 visible minorities • 12 incumbents • 7 previous Ministerial
    [Show full text]
  • New Federal Health Minister: Cabinet Shuffle Recap By: Grant Burns, Public Affairs and Communications Manager
    Be in the Know with OBIO… New Federal Health Minister: Cabinet Shuffle Recap By: Grant Burns, Public Affairs and Communications Manager As part of a federal cabinet shuffle announced on Monday, August 28, Canada’s Minister of Health is now Ginette Petitpas Taylor, Member of Parliament from the riding of Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe in New Brunswick. In total, six MPs had their portfolios changed, addressing two issues for the federal government: 1. The Ministry of Indigenous & Northern Affairs was split in two: the previous Minister of Health, Jane Philpott, will now take over the new Ministry of Indigenous Services and Carolyn Bennett will remain responsible for the Ministry of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs. To replace Minister Philpott at Health, it is noteworthy that Ginette Petitpas Taylor was promoted from outside cabinet, where she had been serving as Parliamentary Secretary to Minster of Finance. 2. To fill the vacancy in the Ministry of Public Services & Procurement caused by Min Judy Foote stepping down last week, Carla Qualtrough was promoted from the Ministry of Sport & Persons with Disabilities. To replace her, Kent Hehr was moved out of the Ministry of Veterans Affairs and he was replaced by Seamus O’Regan, who had been the Associate Minister, National Defence. Name New Portfolio Previous Portfolio Notes Ginette Petitpas Taylor, MP Health Parliamentary Secretary, Finance Jane Philpott, MP Indigenous Services Health Carolyn Bennett, MP Crown-Indigenous Relations Indigenous Relations & Northern Affairs Carla Qualtrough, MP Public Services and Procurement Sport and Persons with Disabilities To replace Min Judy Foote who stepped down last week Seamus O'Regan, MP Veterans Affairs National Defence (Associate Minister) Kent Hehr, MP Sport and Persons with Disabilities Veterans Affairs Background Minister Petitpas Taylor has a bachelor’s degree in social work from the Université de Moncton and prior to her election, she was the coordinator for the Victim's Services Program of the local detachment of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Engagement and Outreach: Federal and Provincial
    Government Engagement and Outreach: Federal and Provincial Dave Carey Manager, Policy Initiatives Growing for the World/ Une Croissance Axée sur le Monde Federal Engagement and Outreach Growing for the World/ Une Croissance Axée sur le Monde Federal Engagement and Outreach • Liberal Party of Canada: • Won 184 of 338 seats in the House • Have 29 of 105 seats in the Senate • New Cabinet with fewer Ministers and public Mandate letters • New Prime Minister with different priorities and goals • House will return on December 3rd for the Speech from the Throne Growing for the World/ Une Croissance Axée sur le Monde Federal Engagement and Outreach Overview of the Federal Legislative Process 1. Passage through the first House Sometimes the Senate, usually the House of Commons 10 st reading. The bill proposing a law is introduced, printed and circulate. nd reading. The principle of 2 i. Ministers, department officials, experts and the bill is debated: “Is the bill good policy?” members of the public appear as witnesses before a committee ommittee stage. ii. Committee members study the bill, clause by C clause eport Stage. iii. The committee adopts a report on the bill, R In the House of recommending that it is accepted as is, or with Commons motions to amend specific amendments or that it not proceed further. clauses of the bill are considered by the whole house, while in in the Senate it is the committee report which is considered and amendments can be proposed. 3rd reading Final approval of the bill; in the Senate, further amendments can be considered at this stage.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Gazette, Part I
    EXTRA Vol. 153, No. 12 ÉDITION SPÉCIALE Vol. 153, no 12 Canada Gazette Gazette du Canada Part I Partie I OTTAWA, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2019 OTTAWA, LE JEUDI 14 NOVEMBRE 2019 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER BUREAU DU DIRECTEUR GÉNÉRAL DES ÉLECTIONS CANADA ELECTIONS ACT LOI ÉLECTORALE DU CANADA Return of Members elected at the 43rd general Rapport de député(e)s élu(e)s à la 43e élection election générale Notice is hereby given, pursuant to section 317 of the Can- Avis est par les présentes donné, conformément à l’ar- ada Elections Act, that returns, in the following order, ticle 317 de la Loi électorale du Canada, que les rapports, have been received of the election of Members to serve in dans l’ordre ci-dessous, ont été reçus relativement à l’élec- the House of Commons of Canada for the following elec- tion de député(e)s à la Chambre des communes du Canada toral districts: pour les circonscriptions ci-après mentionnées : Electoral District Member Circonscription Député(e) Avignon–La Mitis–Matane– Avignon–La Mitis–Matane– Matapédia Kristina Michaud Matapédia Kristina Michaud La Prairie Alain Therrien La Prairie Alain Therrien LaSalle–Émard–Verdun David Lametti LaSalle–Émard–Verdun David Lametti Longueuil–Charles-LeMoyne Sherry Romanado Longueuil–Charles-LeMoyne Sherry Romanado Richmond–Arthabaska Alain Rayes Richmond–Arthabaska Alain Rayes Burnaby South Jagmeet Singh Burnaby-Sud Jagmeet Singh Pitt Meadows–Maple Ridge Marc Dalton Pitt Meadows–Maple Ridge Marc Dalton Esquimalt–Saanich–Sooke Randall Garrison Esquimalt–Saanich–Sooke
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..16 Journalweekly (PRISM::Advent3b2 17.25)
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION 42e LÉGISLATURE, 1re SESSION Journals Journaux No. 22 No 22 Monday, February 22, 2016 Le lundi 22 février 2016 11:00 a.m. 11 heures PRAYER PRIÈRE GOVERNMENT ORDERS ORDRES ÉMANANT DU GOUVERNEMENT The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Trudeau La Chambre reprend l'étude de la motion de M. Trudeau (Prime Minister), seconded by Mr. LeBlanc (Leader of the (premier ministre), appuyé par M. LeBlanc (leader du Government in the House of Commons), — That the House gouvernement à la Chambre des communes), — Que la Chambre support the government’s decision to broaden, improve, and appuie la décision du gouvernement d’élargir, d’améliorer et de redefine our contribution to the effort to combat ISIL by better redéfinir notre contribution à l’effort pour lutter contre l’EIIL en leveraging Canadian expertise while complementing the work of exploitant mieux l’expertise canadienne, tout en travaillant en our coalition partners to ensure maximum effect, including: complémentarité avec nos partenaires de la coalition afin d’obtenir un effet optimal, y compris : (a) refocusing our military contribution by expanding the a) en recentrant notre contribution militaire, et ce, en advise and assist mission of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) in développant la mission de conseil et d’assistance des Forces Iraq, significantly increasing intelligence capabilities in Iraq and armées canadiennes (FAC) en Irak, en augmentant theatre-wide, deploying CAF medical personnel,
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Federal Election: Result and Analysis
    2019 Federal Election: Result and Analysis O C T O B E R 22, 2 0 1 9 NATIONAL ELECTION RESULTS 157 121 24 3 32 (-20) (+26) (-15) (+1) (+22) Comparison between results reflected based on party standings at dissolution of the 42nd parliament • The Liberal Party of Canada (LPC) won a second mandate, although was diminished to minority status. • The result of the 43rd Canadian election is one of the closest in recent memory, with both the Liberals and Conservatives separated by little more than one percentage point. Conservatives share of vote is slightly higher than the Liberals, making major gains in key areas for the party • Bloc Quebecois (BQ) is a winner in this election, moving up to official party status which will give the party added resources as well as significance in the House of Commons • The NDP managed to win enough seats to potentially play an important role in the House of Commons, but the party took a big hit in Quebec — where they were only able to hold one of the Layton era “Orange Wave” seats • Maxime Bernier, who started the People’s Party of Canada after narrowly losing the Conservative leadership contest in 2017, lost the seat he has held onto since 2006 • The former Treasury Board president Dr. Jane Philpott, who ran as an independent following her departure from the liberal caucus, lost her seat in Markham Stouffville to former Liberal MPP and Ontario Minister of Health, Dr. Helena Jaczek. Jody Wilson-Raybould won as an independent in Vancouver Granville NATIONAL ELECTION RESULTS 10 2 32 3 39 24 PARTY STANDINGS AT
    [Show full text]
  • A Parliamentarian's
    A Parliamentarian’s Year in Review 2018 Table of Contents 3 Message from Chris Dendys, RESULTS Canada Executive Director 4 Raising Awareness in Parliament 4 World Tuberculosis Day 5 World Immunization Week 5 Global Health Caucus on HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria 6 UN High-Level Meeting on Tuberculosis 7 World Polio Day 8 Foodies That Give A Fork 8 The Rush to Flush: World Toilet Day on the Hill 9 World Toilet Day on the Hill Meetings with Tia Bhatia 9 Top Tweet 10 Forging Global Partnerships, Networks and Connections 10 Global Nutrition Leadership 10 G7: 2018 Charlevoix 11 G7: The Whistler Declaration on Unlocking the Power of Adolescent Girls in Sustainable Development 11 Global TB Caucus 12 Parliamentary Delegation 12 Educational Delegation to Kenya 14 Hearing From Canadians 14 Citizen Advocates 18 RESULTS Canada Conference 19 RESULTS Canada Advocacy Day on the Hill 21 Engagement with the Leaders of Tomorrow 22 United Nations High-Level Meeting on Tuberculosis 23 Pre-Budget Consultations Message from Chris Dendys, RESULTS Canada Executive Director “RESULTS Canada’s mission is to create the political will to end extreme poverty and we made phenomenal progress this year. A Parliamentarian’s Year in Review with RESULTS Canada is a reminder of all the actions decision makers take to raise their voice on global poverty issues. Thank you to all the Members of Parliament and Senators that continue to advocate for a world where everyone, no matter where they were born, has access to the health, education and the opportunities they need to thrive. “ 3 Raising Awareness in Parliament World Tuberculosis Day World Tuberculosis Day We want to thank MP Ziad Aboultaif, Edmonton MPs Dean Allison, Niagara West, Brenda Shanahan, – Manning, for making a statement in the House, Châteauguay—Lacolle and Senator Mobina Jaffer draw calling on Canada and the world to commit to ending attention to the global tuberculosis epidemic in a co- tuberculosis, the world’s leading infectious killer.
    [Show full text]
  • Insight Trudeau Without Cheers Assessing 10 Years of Intergovernmental Relations
    IRPP Harper without Jeers, Insight Trudeau without Cheers Assessing 10 Years of Intergovernmental Relations September 2016 | No. 8 Christopher Dunn Summary ■■ Stephen Harper’s approach to intergovernmental relations shifted somewhat from the “open federalism” that informed his initial years as prime minister toward greater multilateral engagement with provincial governments and certain unilateral moves. ■■ Harper left a legacy of smaller government and greater provincial self-reliance. ■■ Justin Trudeau focuses on collaboration and partnership, including with Indigenous peoples, but it is too early to assess results. Sommaire ■■ En matière de relations intergouvernementales, l’approche de Stephen Harper s’est progressivement éloignée du « fédéralisme ouvert » de ses premières années au pouvoir au profit d’un plus fort engagement multilatéral auprès des provinces, ponctué ici et là de poussées d’unilatéralisme. ■■ Gouvernement réduit et autonomie provinciale accrue sont deux éléments clés de l’héritage de Stephen Harper. ■■ Justin Trudeau privilégie la collaboration et les partenariats, y compris avec les peuples autochtones, mais il est encore trop tôt pour mesurer les résultats de sa démarche. WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS IN CANADA? Surprises. In October 2015, we had an election with a surprise ending. The Liberal Party, which had been third in the polls for months, won a clear majority. The new prime minister, Justin Trudeau, provided more surprises, engaging in a whirl- wind of talks with first ministers as a group and with social partners that the previous government, led by Stephen Harper, had largely ignored. He promised a new covenant with Indigenous peoples, the extent of which surprised even them. Change was in the air.
    [Show full text]