DOCSLIB.ORG

7565-02 NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISION Notice of Approved Class III Tribal Gaming Ordinances AGENCY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
7565-02 NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISION Notice of Approved Class III Tribal Gaming Ordinances AGENCY This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/24/2021 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2021-10904, and on govinfo.govBilling Code: 7565-02 NATIONAL INDIAN GAMING COMMISION Notice of Approved Class III Tribal Gaming Ordinances AGENCY: National Indian Gaming Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is to inform the public of Class III tribal gaming ordinances approved by the Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission. DATES: This notice is applicable [INSERT DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tearanie McCain, Office of General Counsel at the National Indian Gaming Commission, 202-632-7003, or by facsimile at 202-632-7066 (not toll-free numbers). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., established the National Indian Gaming Commission (Commission). Section 2710 of IGRA authorizes the Chairman of the Commission to approve Class II and Class III tribal gaming ordinances. Section 2710 (d) (2) (B) of IGRA, as implemented by NIGC regulations, 25 CFR 522.8, requires the Chairman to publish, in the Federal Register, approved Class III tribal gaming ordinances and the approvals thereof. IGRA requires all tribal gaming ordinances to contain the same requirements concerning tribes’ sole proprietary interest and responsibility for the gaming activity, use of net revenues, annual audits, health and safety, background investigations and licensing of key employees and primary management officials. The Commission, therefore, believes that publication of each ordinance in the Federal Register would be redundant and result in unnecessary cost to the Commission. Thus, the Commission believes that publishing a notice of approved Class III tribal gaming ordinances in the Federal Register is sufficient to meet the requirements of 25 U.S.C. 2710 (d) (2) (B). Beginning September 30, 2021, the NIGC will publish the notice of approved gaming ordinances quarterly, by March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31 of each year. Every approved tribal gaming ordinance, every approved ordinance amendment, and the approval thereof, will be posted on the Commission’s website (www.nigc.gov) under General Counsel, Gaming Ordinances within five (5) business days of approval. Also, the Commission will make copies of approved Class III ordinances available to the public upon request. Requests can be made in writing to the Office of General Counsel, National Indian Gaming Commission, Attn: Tearanie McCain, C/O Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW, MS #1621, Washington, DC 20240. The following constitutes a consolidated list of all Tribes for which the Chairman has approved tribal gaming ordinances authorizing Class III gaming or for which Class III gaming ordinances have been approved by operation of law. 1. Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Band of Mission Indians Indian of Oklahoma 11. Bay Mills Indian Community 2. Agua Caliente Band of 12. Bear River Band of Cahuilla Indians Rohnerville Rancheria 3. Ak-Chin Indian Community of 13. Berry Creek Rancheria of Tyme the Maricopa Indian Reservation Maidu Indians 4. Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town 14. Big Lagoon Rancheria 5. Alturas Indian Rancheria 15. Big Pine Band of Owens Valley 6. Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Paiute Shoshone Indians 7. Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes of 16. Big Sandy Rancheria Band of Fort Peck Indian Reservation Western Mono Indians 8. Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians 17. Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians 9. Bad River Band of Lake 18. Bishop Paiute Tribe Superior Tribe of Chippewa 19. Blackfeet Tribe Indians 20. Blue Lake Rancheria of California 10. Barona Group of Captain Grande 21. Bois Forte Band of the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe Reservation 22. Buena Vista Rancheria of Me- 56. Confederated Tribes of the Warm Wuk Indians Springs Reservation 23. Burns Paiute Tribe 57. Coquille Indian Tribe 24. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians 58. Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana 25. Cachil DeHe Band of Wintun 59. Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Indians Indians of the Colusa Indian of Oregon Community 60. Cowlitz Indian Tribe 26. Caddo Nation of Oklahoma 61. Coyote Valley Band of Pomo 27. Cahto Indian Tribe of the Indians of California Laytonville Rancheria 62. Crow Creek Sioux Tribe 28. Cahuilla Band of Mission Indians 63. Crow Indian Tribe of Montana 29. California Valley Miwok Tribe 64. Delaware Tribe of Western Oklahoma 30. Campo Band of Diegueno 65. Delaware Tribe of Indians Mission Indians 66. Dry Creek Rancheria of Pomo 31. Catawba Indian Nation Indians of California 32. Chemehuevi Indian Tribe 67. Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians 33. Cher-Ae Heights Indian 68. Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma Community of the Trinidad Rancheria 69. Eastern Shoshone Tribe of the 34. Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma Wind River Indian Reservation 35. Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes 70. Elem Indian Colony of Pomo Indians 36. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe 71. Elk Valley Rancheria 37. Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma 72. Ely Shoshone Tribe of Nevada 38. Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk 73. Enterprise Rancheria of the Indians Maidu Indians of California 39. Chippewa-Cree Tribe of the Rocky 74. Ewiiaapaayp Band of Boy’s Reservation Kumeyaay Indians 40. Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana 75. Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribes 41. Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma 76. Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria 42. Citizen Potawatomi Nation 77. Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of 43. Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians South Dakota 44. Cocopah Indian Tribe 78. Fond du Lac Band of Lake 45. Coeur d’Alene Tribe Superior Chippewa 46. Colorado River Indian Tribes 79. Forest County 47. Comanche Nation of Oklahoma Potawatomi Community 48. Confederated Salish and Kootenai 80. Fort Belknap Indian Community Tribes of the Flathead Reservation 81. Fort Independence Indian 49. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Community of Paiute Indians Yakama Nation 82. Fort McDermitt Paiute - 50. Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Shoshone Tribe of Nevada and Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians of Oregon Oregon 83. Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation 51. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis 84. Fort Mojave Indian Tribe of Reservation Arizona, California and Nevada 52. Confederated Tribes of the Colville 85. Fort Sill Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Reservation 86. Gila River Indian Community 53. Confederated Tribes of the Grand 87. Grand Portage Band of Ronde Community of Oregon Chippewa Indians 54. Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians 88. Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa of Oregon and Chippewa Indians 55. Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla 89. Greenville Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California 132. Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe 90. Grindstone Indian Rancheria of 133. Lower Sioux Indian Community Wintun-Wailaki Indians of California 134. Lummi Indian Tribe 91. Guidiville Band of Pomo Indians 135. Lytton Rancheria of California 92. Habematolel Pomo of Upper Lake 136. Manchester Band of Pomo Indians of 93. Hannahville Indian Community the Manchester-Point Arena Rancheria 94. Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin 137. Manzanita Band of Mission Indians 95. Hoopa Valley Tribe 138. Mashantucket Pequot Tribe 96. Hopland Band of Pomo Indians 139. Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe 97. Hualapai Indian Tribe 140. Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of 98. Huron Potawatomi, Inc. the Potawatomi Indians of Michigan 99. Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel of 141. Mechoopda Indian Tribe of Chico California Rancheria 100. Ione Band of Miwok Indians 142. Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin 101. Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska 143. Mescalero Apache Tribe 102. Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma 144. Miami Tribe of Oklahoma 103. Jackson Rancheria Band of Miwuk 145. Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians Indians 104. Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe of 146. Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Washington 147. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians 105. Jamul Band of Mission Indians 148. Moapa Band of Paiute Indians 106. Jena Band of Choctaw Indians 149. Modoc Tribe of Oklahoma 107. Jicarilla Apache Nation 150. Mohegan Indian Tribe of Connecticut 108. Kaibab Band of Paiute Indians 151. Mooretown Rancheria of Maidu 109. Kalispel Tribe of Indians Indians 110. Karuk Tribe 152. Morongo Band of Mission Indians 111. Kashia Band of Pomo Indians of the 153. Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Stewarts Point Reservation 154. Muscogee (Creek) Nation 112. Kaw Nation 155. Narragansett Indian Tribe 113. Keweenaw Bay Indian Community 156. Navajo Nation 114. Kialegee Tribal Town 157. Nez Perce Tribe 115. Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas 158. Nisqually Indian Tribe 116. Kickapoo Tribe of Indians in Kansas 159. Nooksack Indian Tribe 117. Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma 160. North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians 118. Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma of California 119. Klamath Tribes 161. Northern Arapaho Tribe of the Wind 120. Klawock Cooperative Association River Indians 121. Kootenai Tribe of Idaho 162. Northern Cheyenne Tribe 122. Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake 163. Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Superior Chippewa Indians Potawatomi 123. Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake 164. Oglala Sioux Tribe Superior Chippewa Indians 165. Ohkay Owingeh Pueblo of San Juan 124. Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake 166. Omaha Tribe of Nebraska Superior Chippewa Indians 167. Oneida Nation of New York 125. La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians 168. Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin 126. La Posta Band of Mission Indians 169. Osage Nation 127. Las Vegas Paiute Tribe 170. Otoe-Missouri Tribe of Indians 128. Leech Lake Band of Chippewa Indians 171. Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma 129. Little River Band of Ottawa Indians 172. Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop 130. Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Community Indians 173. Pala Band of Luiseno Mission Indians 131. Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 174. Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona 175. Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians 219. Robinson Rancheria of Pomo Indians 176. Pauma Band of Mission Indians 220. Rosebud Sioux Tribe 177. Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma 221. Round Valley Indian Tribe 178. Pechanga Band of Mission Indians 222. Sac & Fox Nation of Oklahoma 179. Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 223.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federally Recognized Tribes in California by the Department of Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs October 1, 2010
    Federally Recognized Tribes in California by the Department of Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs October 1, 2010 Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation Alturas Indian Rancheria Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians (formerly the Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation) Barona Group of Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians of the Barona Reservation Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California Big Lagoon Rancheria Big Pine Band of Owens Valley Paiute Shoshone Indians of the Big Pine Reservation Big Sandy Rancheria of Mono Indians of California Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians of the Big Valley Rancheria Blue Lake Rancheria Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony of California Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California Cabazon Band of Mission Indians Cachil DeHe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community of the Colusa Rancheria Cahto Indian Tribe of the Laytonville Rancheria Cahuilla Band of Mission Indians of the Cahuilla Reservation California Valley Miwok Tribe Campo Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Campo Indian Reservation Cedarville Rancheria Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of the Chemehuevi Reservation Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California Cold Springs Rancheria of Mono Indians of California Colorado River Indian Tribes of the Colorado River Indian Reservation, Arizona and
    [Show full text]
  • California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A
    California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Written and Designed by Nicole Mullen Contributors: Ira Jacknis, Barbara Takiguchi, and Liberty Winn. Sources Consulted The former exhibition: Food in California Indian Culture at the Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology. Ortiz, Beverly, as told by Julia Parker. It Will Live Forever. Heyday Books, Berkeley, CA 1991. Jacknis, Ira. Food in California Indian Culture. Hearst Museum Publications, Berkeley, CA, 2004. Copyright © 2003. Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology and the Regents of the University of California, Berkeley. All Rights Reserved. PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Table of Contents 1. Glossary 2. Topics of Discussion for Lessons 3. Map of California Cultural Areas 4. General Overview of California Indians 5. Plants and Plant Processing 6. Animals and Hunting 7. Food from the Sea and Fishing 8. Insects 9. Beverages 10. Salt 11. Drying Foods 12. Earth Ovens 13. Serving Utensils 14. Food Storage 15. Feasts 16. Children 17. California Indian Myths 18. Review Questions and Activities PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Glossary basin an open, shallow, usually round container used for holding liquids carbohydrate Carbohydrates are found in foods like pasta, cereals, breads, rice and potatoes, and serve as a major energy source in the diet. Central Valley The Central Valley lies between the Coast Mountain Ranges and the Sierra Nevada Mountain Ranges. It has two major river systems, the Sacramento and the San Joaquin. Much of it is flat, and looks like a broad, open plain. It forms the largest and most important farming area in California and produces a great variety of crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Enrollment Update News February 2012 Proposed Changes in the Tribal Enrollment Ordinance
    [email protected] Enrollment Update News February 2012 Proposed Changes in the Tribal Enrollment Ordinance In October 2011, the Bishop Tribal Council held the 1st of a series of Pub- lic Hearings regarding proposed changes in the enrollment ordinance. The pro- posed changes would be to amend the ordinance to add new criteria such as: blood quantum, a residency clause, and having a contin- ual generational enrollment of descendents. Question: How did we arrive at Each meeting scheduled has discussed a “proposing” a blood quantum different topic. The most recent meeting on Janu- or enrollment changes? ary 25, 2012, the Bishop Tribal Council had invited On December 17, 2009 a tribal ENROLLMENT survey was taken asking if COMMITTEE representatives from the Bureau of Indian Affairs Tribal members would like to in Sacramento, California to give a presentation include a blood quantum in the LAURINE NAPOLES and answer any questions regarding blood quan- tum and when it is used or if it is still used. The current Tribal Enrollment Ordi- RUTH CHAVEZ nance. (134 people responded) meeting with the Bureau of Indian Affairs was in- PATTY MANRIQUEZ This lead to proposed changes formative for both the Enrollment Committee and and public hearings. GERALD HOWARD the community. ROBIN HOWARD The importance of these Public Hearings is for the community to become informed and be involved in the decision making process. Hopefully, the Enrollment Committee and Department can answer some ENROLLMENT DEPARTMENT of the misconceptions that have been mentioned during the Public Hearings. (i.e., GERTRUDE BROWN, We have members coming out of the “wood works”.
    [Show full text]
  • California Gambling Control Commission Revenue Sharing Trust Fund Recipients March 4, 2009
    CALIFORNIA GAMBLING CONTROL COMMISSION REVENUE SHARING TRUST FUND RECIPIENTS MARCH 4, 2009 TRIBE CASINO LOCATION 1 Alturas Indian Rancheria Desert Rose Casino Alturas 2 Bear River Band of Rohnerville Rancheria Bear River Casino Loleta 3 Benton Paiute Reservation N/A Benton 4 Big Lagoon Rancheria N/A Trinidad 5 Big Pine Reservation N/A Big Pine 6 Big Sandy Rancheria Mono Wind Casino Auberry Konocti Vista 7 Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians Lakeport Casino Paiute Palace 8 Bishop Paiute Tribe Bishop Casino 9 Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony N/A Bridgeport 10 Buena Vista Rancheria N/A Ione 11 Cahto Indian Tribe of Laytonville Rancheria Red Fox Casino Laytonville Cahuilla Creek 12 Cahuilla Band of Mission Indians Anza Casino 13 California Valley Miwok Tribe N/A Stockton 14 Cedarville Rancheria N/A Alturas Havasu Landing 15 Chemehuevi Indian Tribe Havasu Lake Resort and Casino Cher-Ae-Heights 16 Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community Trinidad Casino Chicken Ranch 17 Chicken Ranch Rancheria Jamestown Bingo and Casino 18 Cloverdale Rancheria N/A Cloverdale 19 Cold Springs Rancheria N/A Tollhouse CALIFORNIA GAMBLING CONTROL COMMISSION REVENUE SHARING TRUST FUND RECIPIENTS MARCH 4, 2009 TRIBE CASINO LOCATION 20 Colorado River Indian Tribes N/A Parker, AZ 1 21 Cortina Rancheria N/A Williams Coyote Valley 22 Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians Redwood Valley Shodakai Casino 23 Death Valley Timba-Sha Shoshone Tribe N/A Death Valley 24 Elem Indian Colony N/A Clearlake Oaks 25 Elk Valley Rancheria Elk Valley Casino Crescent City 26 Enterprise Rancheria N/A Oroville
    [Show full text]
  • Plants Used in Basketry by the California Indians
    PLANTS USED IN BASKETRY BY THE CALIFORNIA INDIANS BY RUTH EARL MERRILL PLANTS USED IN BASKETRY BY THE CALIFORNIA INDIANS RUTH EARL MERRILL INTRODUCTION In undertaking, as a study in economic botany, a tabulation of all the plants used by the California Indians, I found it advisable to limit myself, for the time being, to a particular form of use of plants. Basketry was chosen on account of the availability of material in the University's Anthropological Museum. Appreciation is due the mem- bers of the departments of Botany and Anthropology for criticism and suggestions, especially to Drs. H. M. Hall and A. L. Kroeber, under whose direction the study was carried out; to Miss Harriet A. Walker of the University Herbarium, and Mr. E. W. Gifford, Asso- ciate Curator of the Museum of Anthropology, without whose interest and cooperation the identification of baskets and basketry materials would have been impossible; and to Dr. H. I. Priestley, of the Ban- croft Library, whose translation of Pedro Fages' Voyages greatly facilitated literary research. Purpose of the sttudy.-There is perhaps no phase of American Indian culture which is better known, at least outside strictly anthro- pological circles, than basketry. Indian baskets are not only concrete, durable, and easily handled, but also beautiful, and may serve a variety of purposes beyond mere ornament in the civilized household. Hence they are to be found in. our homes as well as our museums, and much has been written about the art from both the scientific and the popular standpoints. To these statements, California, where American basketry.
    [Show full text]
  • Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes
    National Plant Data Team August 2012 Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes and the Klamath Tribe of Oregon in the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum of Anthropology Collections, University of California, Berkeley August 2012 Cover photos: Left: Maidu woman harvesting tarweed seeds. Courtesy, The Field Museum, CSA1835 Right: Thick patch of elegant madia (Madia elegans) in a blue oak woodland in the Sierra foothills The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its pro- grams and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sex- ual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Acknowledgments This report was authored by M. Kat Anderson, ethnoecologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and Jim Effenberger, Don Joley, and Deborah J. Lionakis Meyer, senior seed bota- nists, California Department of Food and Agriculture Plant Pest Diagnostics Center. Special thanks to the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum staff, especially Joan Knudsen, Natasha Johnson, Ira Jacknis, and Thusa Chu for approving the project, helping to locate catalogue cards, and lending us seed samples from their collections.
    [Show full text]
  • TRIBAL LEADERS DIRECTORY Includes the BIA Region & Agency Contacts
    BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS TRIBAL LEADERS DIRECTORY Includes the BIA Region & Agency Contacts _____________________________________________________________________ FALL/WINTER 2013 EDITION Semi-Annual Publication This is an Internal Reference Document For use by the Division of Tribal Government Services & is updated 2 times per year. For questions or more information, contact the Division of Tribal Government Services at 202-513-7641 or contact your Regional Tribal Government Office The printing date appears on the lower left-hand corner of the pages in section 2. This directory is posted on the Bureau of Indian Affairs website at the internet address below http://www.bia.gov/WhoWeAre/BIA/OIS/TribalGovernmentServices/TribalDirectory/index.htm NOTE: Tribal Elections & changes in Tribal Leadership occur within the different BIA Regions throughout the year. The information contained in this Edition was the most current information available at the time of publication and will remain as is until the next Edition. All updates are coordinated through the BIA Central & Regional Tribal Government Offices. Thank you. Table of Contents Section 1 Office of the Assistant Secretary – Indian Affairs 1 Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs 2 Regional Directors 3 Section 2 Alaska Region 1 Eastern Region 31 Eastern Oklahoma Region 36 Great Plains Region 40 Midwest Region 44 Navajo Region 50 Northwest Region 52 Pacific Region 60 Rocky Mountain Region 74 Southern Plains Region 76 Southwest Region 80 Western Region 85 Section 3 Index – Tribal Entities 1-24 Section 4 Index – Tribal Entities By State 1-25 Section 5 Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 87 /Monday, May 6, 2013/Notices, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Indian Entities Recognized and Eligible To Receive Services From the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs Office of the Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs 1849 C Street, N.W., MS-4004-MIB Washinton, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • American Community Survey and Puerto Rico Community Survey 2011 Code List
    American Community Survey and Puerto Rico Community Survey 2011 Code List 1 Table of Contents Ancestry Code List ……………….…………………………………………………………... 3 Group Quarters Classification ………..……………………………………………………..19 Hispanic Origin Code List …………………………………………………………………....20 Industry Code List …………………………….…………………………………………..…..22 Language Code List …………………………………………………………………..……...32 Occupation Code List …………………………………………………….…………………..36 Place of Birth, Migration, & Place of Work Code List …………………………..…………50 Race Code List ………………………………………….…………………………………….56 2 2011 Ancestry Code List 001-099 WESTERN EUROPE (EXCEPT SPAIN) 001 ALSATIAN 002 ANDORRAN 003 AUSTRIAN 004 TIROL 005 BASQUE 006 FRENCH BASQUE 007 SPANISH BASQUE 008 BELGIAN 009 FLEMISH 010 WALLOON 011 BRITISH 012 BRITISH ISLES 013 CHANNEL ISLANDER 014 GIBRALTAR 015 CORNISH 016 CORSICAN 017 CYPRIOT 018 GREEK CYPRIOTE 019 TURKISH CYPRIOTE 020 DANISH 021 DUTCH 022 ENGLISH 023 FAEROE ISLANDER 024 FINNISH 025 KARELIAN 026 FRENCH 027 LORRAINE 028 BRETON 029 FRISIAN 030 FRIULIAN 031 LADIN 032 GERMAN 033 BAVARIA 034 BERLIN 035 HAMBURG 036 HANNOVER 037 HESSIAN 038 LUBECKER 039 POMERANIAN 040 PRUSSIAN 041 SAXON 042 SUDETENLANDER 043 WESTPHALIAN 044 EAST GERMAN 3 045 WEST GERMAN 046 GREEK 047 CRETAN 048 CYCLADES 049 ICELANDER 050 IRISH 051 ITALIAN 052 TRIESTE 053 ABRUZZI 054 APULIAN 055 BASILICATA 056 CALABRIAN 057 AMALFIN 058 EMILIA ROMAGNA 059 ROME 060 LIGURIAN 061 LOMBARDIAN 062 MARCHE 063 MOLISE 064 NEAPOLITAN 065 PIEDMONTESE 066 PUGLIA 067 SARDINIAN 068 SICILIAN 069 TUSCANY 070 TRENTINO 071 UMBRIAN 072
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnohistory and Ethnogeography of the Coast Miwok and Their Neighbors, 1783-1840
    ETHNOHISTORY AND ETHNOGEOGRAPHY OF THE COAST MIWOK AND THEIR NEIGHBORS, 1783-1840 by Randall Milliken Technical Paper presented to: National Park Service, Golden Gate NRA Cultural Resources and Museum Management Division Building 101, Fort Mason San Francisco, California Prepared by: Archaeological/Historical Consultants 609 Aileen Street Oakland, California 94609 June 2009 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY This report documents the locations of Spanish-contact period Coast Miwok regional and local communities in lands of present Marin and Sonoma counties, California. Furthermore, it documents previously unavailable information about those Coast Miwok communities as they struggled to survive and reform themselves within the context of the Franciscan missions between 1783 and 1840. Supplementary information is provided about neighboring Southern Pomo-speaking communities to the north during the same time period. The staff of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA) commissioned this study of the early native people of the Marin Peninsula upon recommendation from the report’s author. He had found that he was amassing a large amount of new information about the early Coast Miwoks at Mission Dolores in San Francisco while he was conducting a GGNRA-funded study of the Ramaytush Ohlone-speaking peoples of the San Francisco Peninsula. The original scope of work for this study called for the analysis and synthesis of sources identifying the Coast Miwok tribal communities that inhabited GGNRA parklands in Marin County prior to Spanish colonization. In addition, it asked for the documentation of cultural ties between those earlier native people and the members of the present-day community of Coast Miwok. The geographic area studied here reaches far to the north of GGNRA lands on the Marin Peninsula to encompass all lands inhabited by Coast Miwoks, as well as lands inhabited by Pomos who intermarried with them at Mission San Rafael.
    [Show full text]
  • Genocide and the Indians of California, 1769-1873 Margaret A
    University of Massachusetts Boston ScholarWorks at UMass Boston Graduate Masters Theses Doctoral Dissertations and Masters Theses 5-1993 Genocide and the Indians of California, 1769-1873 Margaret A. Field University of Massachusetts Boston Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.umb.edu/masters_theses Part of the Native American Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Field, Margaret A., "Genocide and the Indians of California, 1769-1873" (1993). Graduate Masters Theses. Paper 141. This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Doctoral Dissertations and Masters Theses at ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GENOCIDE AND THE INDIANS OF CALIFORNIA , 1769-1873 A Thesis Presented by MARGARET A. FIELD Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies and Research of the Un1versity of Massachusetts at Boston in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS MAY 1993 HISTCRY PROGRAM GENOCIDE AND THE I NDIAN S OF CALIFORNIA, 1769-187 3 A Thesis P resented by MARGARET A. FIELD Approved as to style and content by : Clive Foss , Professor Co - Chairperson of Committee mes M. O'Too le , Assistant Professor -Chairpers on o f Committee Memb e r Ma rshall S. Shatz, Pr og~am Director Department of History ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank professors Foss , O'Toole, and Buckley f or their assistance in preparing this manuscri pt and for their encouragement throughout the project .
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 98/Monday, May 24, 2021/Notices
    27892 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 98 / Monday, May 24, 2021 / Notices 225. Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of 273. Tolowa Dee-ni’ Nation Commission (‘‘Commission’’) Michigan 274. Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 226. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian 275. Tonto Apache Tribe 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the Community 276. Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla countervailing duty and antidumping 227. Samish Indian Tribe Indians duty orders on certain steel grating from 228. San Carlos Apache Tribe 277. Tulalip Tribes of Washington China would be likely to lead to 229. San Manual Band of Mission 278. Tule River Tribe continuation or recurrence of material Indians 279. Tunica-Biloxi Indians of Louisiana injury to an industry in the United 230. San Pasqual Band of Diegueno 280. Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk States within a reasonably foreseeable Mission Indians Indians time. 231. Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi-Yokut 281. Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Tribe Indians Background 232. Santa Ynez Band of Chumash 282. Twenty-Nine Palms Band of The Commission instituted these Mission Indians Mission Indians reviews on October 1, 2020 (85 FR 233. Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe 283. United Auburn Indian Community 61981) and determined on January 4, 234. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa 284. Upper Sioux Community 2021 that it would conduct expedited Indians 285. Upper Skagit Indian Tribe of reviews (86 FR 19286, April 13, 2021). 235. Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians Washington The Commission made these 236. Seminole Nation of Oklahoma 286. Ute Mountain Ute Tribe determinations pursuant to section 237.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 107/Wednesday, June 3, 2020
    34228 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 107 / Wednesday, June 3, 2020 / Notices Oklahoma and the Wichita and of these human remains and associated the request to the University of the Affiliated Tribes (Wichita, Keechi, Waco funerary objects should submit a written Pacific, Dugoni School of Dentistry at & Tawakonie), Oklahoma (hereafter request with information in support of the address in this notice by July 6, referred to as ‘‘The Tribes’’). the request to Dr. Marc Levine, 2020. Associate Curator of Archaeology, Sam History and Description of the Remains ADDRESSES: Dorothy Dechant, Center for Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural Dental History and Craniofacial Study, In 1957, human remains representing, History, University of Oklahoma, 2401 University of the Pacific, Dugoni School at minimum, four individuals were Chautauqua Avenue, Norman, OK of Dentistry, 155 Fifth Street, San excavated by the University of 73072–7029, telephone (405) 325–1994, Francisco, CA 94103–2919, telephone Oklahoma at site 34Ms20 in Muskogee email [email protected], by July 6, 2020. (415) 929–6627, email ddechant@ County, OK. At an unknown date, the After that date, if no additional pacific.edu. associated cultural materials were requestors have come forward, transfer SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: transferred to the Museum. The human of control of the human remains and Notice is here given in accordance with the remains include the partial skeleton of associated funerary objects to The Native American Graves Protection and an adult male 20–35 years old that were Tribes may proceed. Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. commingled with remains of a child 7– The Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of 3003, of the completion of an inventory 9 years old, a young adult 18–22 years Natural History is responsible for of human remains under the control of old of indeterminate sex, and a young notifying The Tribes that this notice has the University of the Pacific, Dugoni adult 20–30 years old of indeterminate been published.
    [Show full text]