Sot Annual Report, Audit Opinion and Accounts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sot Annual Report, Audit Opinion and Accounts 1 If you would like to receive this Annual Report in another format – such as audio, Easy Read, British Sign Language, interpreter services, large print, or Braille – please contact the general reception number and speak to any member of the administration team - 01782 298002 or use the Next Generation Text Service at www.ngts.org.uk for deaf and hard of hearing patients, carers and staff. We want our patients, carers, staff and partner organisations to be able to understand our information in the format that is most accessible to their individual needs. This includes identifying and reasonably removing ‘barriers’ for people accessing our information, services, premises, any employment or engagement opportunities. This may involve responding to our anticipatory equality duty to make ‘reasonable adjustments’, from requests received. 2 Contents Chair’s Introduction ............................................................................................................... 4 Performance Report .............................................................................................................. 6 Overview: About Stoke-on-Trent CCG ........................................................................... 6 Accountable Officer’s Introduction .................................................................................. 8 Performance Analysis ...................................................................................................... 11 Our principal risks ........................................................................................................ 11 Going concern ............................................................................................................. 11 Performance overview ................................................................................................. 11 Performance against key performance indicators ......................................................... 21 The CCG’s position at the end of the financial year ...................................................... 22 Sustainable Development ............................................................................................ 26 Discharge of statutory duties ........................................................................................ 28 Key Achievements in 2018/19 ...................................................................................... 53 Accountability Report .......................................................................................................... 68 Corporate Governance Report ........................................................................................ 68 Statement of Accountable Officer’s Responsibilities ..................................................... 74 Governance Statement ................................................................................................ 76 Head of Internal Audit Opinion ..................................................................................... 99 Remuneration and Staff Report ..................................................................................... 102 Remuneration Report ................................................................................................. 102 Staff Report ................................................................................................................ 115 Parliamentary Accountability and Audit Report .............................................................. 126 List of acronyms ............................................................................................................ 127 3 Chair’s Introduction This year marked the 70th anniversary of the NHS and my first as Chair of Stoke-on-Trent Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG), both landmarks of which I am extremely proud. The year 2018/19 has been both a challenging and a productive one for Stoke-on-Trent CCG, with our focus being very much on working as part of the wider Staffordshire health and care system and reinvigorating our engagement with our stakeholders and patients. As six CCGs across Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent operating under one Accountable Officer and executive team, we are working closely with our local authorities, hospital and community provider trusts, GP practices and the Third Sector. This is to create a more joined-up health and care system with the need for a seamless patient journey and more care delivered closer to home at its heart. We presented our proposed new model of care as part of our public consultation about the Future of Local Health Services in Northern Staffordshire. With an ageing population, and higher proportion of the population living with a long-term condition such as diabetes or heart disease, we need to find better ways to support patients to manage their health and stay well and independent for as long as possible. Our vision is that more care is delivered closer to patient’s homes, by a multi-disciplinary team of healthcare professionals considering the holistic needs of the patient, rather than the traditional condition-focussed approach. This should mean that patients feel better supported to managed their long-term conditions and that they need to go to hospital less often. When patients do need to go to hospital, they will need to spend less time there because there will be skilled teams working in the community to support them to recover at home and maintain their independence, or care for them whilst they regain it. We listened to the views of patients and the public at over 60 public events, as well as market stalls, outreach meetings and a paper and online survey over 14 weeks. The consultation closed on 17 March 2019 and we would like to thank all of the residents and patients of Northern Staffordshire who took the time to share their views with us, and indeed all of our staff who helped to deliver these events. We look forward to reading and considering all of the feedback that we have received and sharing the results in due course. We have developed new Membership Engagement Groups where the CCG meets monthly with GPs and practice managers from all of the practices in Stoke-on-Trent to ask their views on our plans and services. I attend as many of these as I can in person, to make sure that the CCG continues to live up to its fundamental design principle: that GPs are experts on the needs of their patients and our grassroots clinicians must be able to influence the health services that we commission. We have just emerged from winter where the healthcare system coped much better than it has done in the past. This year we saw patients waiting for less time in the Emergency Department and to be admitted and discharged from hospital beds; and no planned operations were cancelled this year. While there are still a lot of improvements to be made to our urgent and emergency care system, this is a hugely positive change compared with previous years and we look forward to building on these successes. I would like to personally thank all of our hard-working NHS staff across the hospital, community, general practice and social care services in Stoke-on-Trent for the continued dedication they show particularly during difficult times. 4 In January, we received the NHS Long Term Plan, which sets us challenges in terms of improving prevention of disease, as well as care quality and outcomes; and to deliver care in different ways using upgraded technology and digital solutions as well as new types of healthcare professionals. Locally, we have seen the variety of healthcare professional roles expand from Advanced Nurse Practitioners that most of us have become familiar with, to include: practice-based Pharmacists, Paramedic Practitioners, Physicians Associates and now Social Prescribers. These new roles are vital in our new model of community-based care, to ensure that patients receive the right care, in the right place at the right time - and to meet the growing healthcare needs of our population. In Stoke-on-Trent, we are also fortunate that we have a very active technology-enabled care (TECs) programme, which has received national plaudits for their innovative scheme to provide GP support to care homes via Skype. We are finalising plans for an Integrated Care Record which will make your important information available to health and care professionals working in whichever service you need to access, reducing the need to tell your story multiple times and keeping you safer. As I look forward to 2019/20 which is set to be challenging and exciting in equal measure, it would be remiss of me not to thank my predecessor Professor Ruth Chambers who stepped down as Chair at the end of December 2018. Ruth has been a champion for patient care in Stoke-on-Trent and she leaves big shoes to fill, but fortunately she continues to lead our TECs programme and so her wealth of experience and knowledge will not be lost to us. Dr Lorna Clarson Clinical Chair, Stoke-on-Trent Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) 5 Performance Report Overview: About Stoke-on-Trent CCG Stoke-on-Trent CCG plans and buys (commissions) health services for local people. The membership of the CCG is made up of the GP practices – as GPs, they are best placed to understand what services their patients need. We are run by a ‘Governing Body’ that includes a mix of GPs, a secondary care consultant and local lay members. We buy services from hospitals, mental health and community health bodies and charities. We do this alone or in partnership with other local CCGs. We
Recommended publications
  • Sexual Health Introduction This Constitutes the Full Section on Sexual Health for the Adults’ JSNA 2016
    For feedback, please contact [email protected] Last updated 4-Apr-16 Review date 30-Apr-17 Sexual Health Introduction This constitutes the full section on Sexual Health for the Adults’ JSNA 2016. ‘Sexual health is a state of physical, mental and social well-being in relation to sexuality. It requires a positive and respectful approach to sexuality and sexual relationships, as well as the possibility of having pleasurable and safe sexual experiences, free of coercion, discrimination and violence.’1 Who’s at risk and why? According to the National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles Surveys (Natsal)2,3 sexual health behaviour of the population of England has changed since the survey was first undertaken in 1991. The 2011 Natsal survey demonstrated an increase in the: number of sexual partners over a person’s lifetime, particularly for women, where this has increased from 3.7 (1991) to 7.7 (2011) sexual repertoire of heterosexual partners, particularly with oral and anal sexual intercourse All sexually active individuals of all ages are at risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV, and unplanned pregnancies (in the fertile years). However, the risks are not equally distributed amongst the population, with certain groups being at greater risk. Poor sexual health may also be associated with other poor health outcomes. Those at highest risk of poor sexual health are often from specific population groups, with varying needs which include: Men who have sex with men (MSM) Young people who are more likely to become re-infected with STIs Some black and ethnic minority groups Sex workers Victims of sexual and domestic abuse Other marginalised or vulnerable groups, including prisoners Nationally, there is a correlation between STIs and deprivation.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhoods in England Rated E for Green Space, Friends of The
    Neighbourhoods in England rated E for Green Space, Friends of the Earth, September 2020 Neighbourhood_Name Local_authority Marsh Barn & Widewater Adur Wick & Toddington Arun Littlehampton West and River Arun Bognor Regis Central Arun Kirkby Central Ashfield Washford & Stanhope Ashford Becontree Heath Barking and Dagenham Becontree West Barking and Dagenham Barking Central Barking and Dagenham Goresbrook & Scrattons Farm Barking and Dagenham Creekmouth & Barking Riverside Barking and Dagenham Gascoigne Estate & Roding Riverside Barking and Dagenham Becontree North Barking and Dagenham New Barnet West Barnet Woodside Park Barnet Edgware Central Barnet North Finchley Barnet Colney Hatch Barnet Grahame Park Barnet East Finchley Barnet Colindale Barnet Hendon Central Barnet Golders Green North Barnet Brent Cross & Staples Corner Barnet Cudworth Village Barnsley Abbotsmead & Salthouse Barrow-in-Furness Barrow Central Barrow-in-Furness Basildon Central & Pipps Hill Basildon Laindon Central Basildon Eversley Basildon Barstable Basildon Popley Basingstoke and Deane Winklebury & Rooksdown Basingstoke and Deane Oldfield Park West Bath and North East Somerset Odd Down Bath and North East Somerset Harpur Bedford Castle & Kingsway Bedford Queens Park Bedford Kempston West & South Bedford South Thamesmead Bexley Belvedere & Lessness Heath Bexley Erith East Bexley Lesnes Abbey Bexley Slade Green & Crayford Marshes Bexley Lesney Farm & Colyers East Bexley Old Oscott Birmingham Perry Beeches East Birmingham Castle Vale Birmingham Birchfield East Birmingham
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Reading Health and Wellbeing Strategy 2017-20 - Action Plan - Updated January 2019
    Appendix A: Reading Health and Wellbeing Strategy 2017-20 - Action Plan - updated January 2019 PRIORITY No 1 Supporting people to make healthy lifestyle choices – dental care, reducing obesity, increasing physical activity, reducing smoking What will be done – the task Who will do it By when Outcome – the Supporting national Progress Update – January 2019 difference it will make indicators To Prevent Uptake of Smoking Wellbeing Team; From April 2017 Maintain/reduce the PHOF 2.03 - Smoking 3 Reading schools have Trading number of people >18 status at the time of expressed interest in the young - Education in schools Standards; CS; years who are estimated delivery person’s smoking and drinking - Health promotion to smoke in Reading S4H; Youth attitudinal survey. Deadline Dec - Quit services targeting PHOF 2.09i – Smoking th pregnant Services; 14 . Improve awareness of prevalence at age 15- women/families Schools; impact of smoking on current smokers (WAY The Tobacco Control Alliance - Underage sales children survey) [TCA] Coordinator work has Reduce the illegal sale of involved: PHOF 2.09ii – Smoking tobacco to >18 years prevalence at age 15 – - Year 9 Assembly at st Increase uptake of regular smokers (WAY Prospect School on 1 smoking cessation >18 survey) March. years - Year 9 students at PHOF 2.09iii – Smoking Reading Girls School on prevalence at age 15 – 27th November – rest of occasional smokers (WAY school year groups survey) booked in for the next PHOF 2.09iv – Smoking year prevalence at age 15 – - Year 7 students about regular smokers (SDD smoking health harms at survey) The Wren School on 7th November. Rest of PHOF 2.09v – Smoking school booked in for prevalence at age 15 – next year.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Proposals for New Parliamentary Constituency Boundaries in the South East Region Contents
    Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the South East region Contents Summary 3 1 What is the Boundary Commission for England? 5 2 Background to the 2018 Review 7 3 Initial proposals for the South East region 11 Initial proposals for the Berkshire sub-region 12 Initial proposals for the Brighton and Hove, East Sussex, 13 Kent, and Medway sub-region Initial proposals for the West Sussex sub-region 16 Initial proposals for the Buckinghamshire 17 and Milton Keynes sub-region Initial proposals for the Hampshire, Portsmouth 18 and Southampton sub-region Initial proposals for the Isle of Wight sub-region 20 Initial proposals for the Oxfordshire sub-region 20 Initial proposals for the Surrey sub-region 21 4 How to have your say 23 Annex A: Initial proposals for constituencies, 27 including wards and electorates Glossary 53 Initial proposals for new Parliamentary constituency boundaries in the South East region 1 Summary Who we are and what we do Our proposals leave 15 of the 84 existing constituencies unchanged. We propose The Boundary Commission for England only minor changes to a further 47 is an independent and impartial constituencies, with two wards or fewer non -departmental public body which is altered from the existing constituencies. responsible for reviewing Parliamentary constituency boundaries in England. The rules that we work to state that we must allocate two constituencies to the Isle The 2018 Review of Wight. Neither of these constituencies is required to have an electorate that is within We have the task of periodically reviewing the requirements on electoral size set out the boundaries of all the Parliamentary in the rules.
    [Show full text]
  • 11K Donation from the DPS to Help LGBT Young People in Brighton and Hove Find a Home Through YMCA Downslink Group - Youth Advice Centre
    Computershare Investor Services PLC The Pavilions Bridgwater Road Bristol BS99 6ZZ Telephone + 44 (0) 870 702 0000 Facsimile + 44 (0) 870 703 6101 www.computershare.com News Release Monday 27 February 2017 Date: Subject: £11k donation from The DPS to help LGBT young people in Brighton and Hove find a home through YMCA DownsLink Group - Youth Advice Centre Bristol, Monday 27 February 2017 – An £11,000 donation by The Deposit Protection Service (The DPS) will fund specialist support from YMCA DownsLink Group - Youth Advice Centre for LGBT young people in Brighton and Hove to help them find a home, the UK’s largest protector of tenancy deposits has announced. The Centre will train volunteers one-to-one to become ‘peer mentors’ and provide support to other members of the local LGBT community. Daren King, Head of Tenancy Deposit Protection at The DPS, said: “83,000 young people experience homelessness every year and the South East has the second highest rate of homeless applications in England. “As a result, we’re delighted to be supporting YMCA DownsLink Group - Youth Advice Centre’s fantastic work in helping LGBT young people in Brighton and Hove find a home.” YMCA DownsLink Group - Youth Advice Centre is a “one-stop shop” for advice and information for young people aged 13-25 years old in the City of Brighton and Hove. Julia Harrison, Advice Services Manager at YMCA DownsLink Group - Youth Advice Centre, said: “LGBT young people account for 13% of the total number of clients accessing our housing service, with a 50% increase in transgender clients since April 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    50 bus time schedule & line map 50 Brighton - Hollingdean View In Website Mode The 50 bus line (Brighton - Hollingdean) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Brighton: 5:44 AM - 11:39 PM (2) Brighton: 12:09 AM - 11:54 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 50 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 50 bus arriving. Direction: Brighton 50 bus Time Schedule 28 stops Brighton Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 7:24 AM - 11:10 PM Monday 5:44 AM - 11:39 PM Lewes Road Bus Garage, Brighton Tuesday 5:44 AM - 11:39 PM Sainsbury'S, Brighton Lewes Road, Brighton and Hove Wednesday 5:44 AM - 11:39 PM Bottom Of Davey Drive, Brighton Thursday 5:44 AM - 11:39 PM Friday 5:44 AM - 11:39 PM Waverley Crescent, Brighton Saturday 5:53 AM - 11:39 PM St Joseph's School, Brighton Tavistock Down, Brighton Mountƒelds, Brighton 50 bus Info Direction: Brighton Lynchet Close, Brighton Stops: 28 Trip Duration: 32 min Brentwood Crescent, Brighton Line Summary: Lewes Road Bus Garage, Brighton, Sainsbury'S, Brighton, Bottom Of Davey Drive, Hollingbury Rise, Brighton and Hove Brighton, Waverley Crescent, Brighton, St Joseph's School, Brighton, Tavistock Down, Brighton, Burstead Close, Brighton Mountƒelds, Brighton, Lynchet Close, Brighton, Brentwood Crescent, Brighton, Burstead Close, Quarry Bank Road, Brighton Brighton, Quarry Bank Road, Brighton, Hollingbury Stanmer Villas, Brighton and Hove Crescent, Brighton, The Dip, Brighton, Hollingdean Street, Brighton, Bottom Of Roedale Road, Brighton, Hollingbury Crescent, Brighton
    [Show full text]
  • {Download PDF} Portsmouth Pubs Ebook Free Download
    PORTSMOUTH PUBS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Steve Wallis | 96 pages | 15 Feb 2017 | Amberley Publishing | 9781445659893 | English | Chalford, United Kingdom Portsmouth Pubs PDF Book Bristol, 10 pubs per square mile 4. Purnell Farm was then later renamed Middle Farm by the Goldsmith's. Third place is a tie between Bristol, Brighton and Hove, and Norwich, with all three spots having 10 pubs per square mile. St James' Hospital , an institution for the treatment of mental health, first opened in on what was then called Asylum Road, now named Locksway Road. More top stories. From Business: It's more than beer for us; MoMac is a place for the whole neighborhood to have fun. When looking at the UK as a whole, Portsmouth came out on top with almost double the number of pubs per square mile than London overall though many of the capital's boroughs soar far above Portsmouth's total. But it is Brighton and Hove that has the most pubs per people out of all three. Sarah Dinenage Con [9]. But researchers point out that the area is almost 12, square miles in size. Add your own AMAZing articles. Parking Available. Mostly consisting of makeshift houseboats, converted railway carriages and fisherman huts, many of these homes, lacking the basic amenities of electricity and plumbed water supplies, survived into the s until they were cleared. The land is still settling and the cavities of Milton Common make ideal homes for foxes and other wildlife. Trafalgar Arms 11 reviews. Stellar Wine Co. The taste is totally different from what I had and I was a frequent customer for the last years!!! The start of the week is your cue for free pool — you can take to the table free of charge all day on a Monday.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6 Performance Indicator and CIPFA Data Comparisons BVPI Comparisons
    Appendix 6 Performance Indicator and CIPFA Data Comparisons BVPI Comparisons Southend-on-Sea vs CPA Environment High Scorers / Nearest Neighbours / Unitaries BV 106: Percentage of new homes built on previously developed land 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Southend-on-Sea 100 100 100 CPA 2002 Environment score 3 or 4 in unitary authorities, by indicator 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 56.8 63 n/a Bournemouth 94 99 n/a Derby 51 63 n/a East Riding of Yorkshire 24.08 16.64 n/a Halton 27.48 49 n/a Hartlepool 40.8 56 n/a Isle of Wight 84 86 n/a Kingston-upon-Hull 40 36 n/a Luton 99 99.01 n/a Middlesbrough 74.3 61 n/a Nottingham 97 99 n/a Peterborough 79.24 93.66 n/a Plymouth 81.3 94.4 n/a South Gloucestershire 41 44.6 n/a Stockton-on-Tees 33 29.34 n/a Stoke-on-Trent 58.4 61 n/a Telford & Wrekin 54 55.35 n/a Torbay 39 58.57 n/a CIPFA 'Nearest Neighbour' Benchmark Group 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Blackpool 56.8 63 n/a Bournemouth 94 99 n/a Brighton & Hove 99.7 100 n/a Isle of Wight 84 86 n/a Portsmouth 98.6 100 n/a Torbay 39 58.57 n/a Unitaries 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 Unitary 75th percentile 94 93.7 n/a Unitary Median 70 65 n/a Unitary 25th percentile 41 52.3 n/a Average 66.3 68.7 n/a Source: ODPM website BV 107: Planning cost per head of population.
    [Show full text]
  • BHCC Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
    Brighton & Hove City Council BHCC Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Project Ref: 23301/2001 | Rev: 3 | Date: February 2015 Office Address: Caversham Bridge House, Waterman Place, Reading, Berkshire RG1 8DN T: +44 (0)118 950 0761 F: +44 (0)118 959 7498 E: [email protected] Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Brighton and Hove City Council Document Control Sheet Project Name: Brighton and Hove City Council - LFRMS Project Ref: 23301/2001 Report Title: Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Doc Ref: R001 Date: November 2014 Name Position Signature Date Prepared by: Vicky Hogg Senior Engineer VH 21/11/14 Reviewed by: Mark Lennon Senior Engineer ML 21/11/14 Approved by: Daniel Hayes Director 21/11/14 For and on behalf of Peter Brett Associates LLP Revision Date Description Prepared Reviewed Approved 0 21/11/14 Draft VH ML DTH 1 24/11/14 2nd Draft with Appendices VH ML DTH 2 12/12/14 RMA consultation VH ML DTH 3 13/02/15 For Public Consultation ML DTH DTH 4. 16/06/15 Final DTH DTH DTH Peter Brett Associates LLP disclaims any responsibility to the Client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of this report. This report has been prepared with reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the Client and generally in accordance with the appropriate ACE Agreement and taking account of the manpower, resources, investigations and testing devoted to it by agreement with the Client. This report is confidential to the Client and Peter Brett Associates LLP accepts no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report or any part thereof is made known.
    [Show full text]
  • England Screening Uptake Rates
    England screening uptake rates The average screening uptake rate in England is 58% In some cases it is as low as 33% 44% of CCGs in England are below the national average Seven out of ten of the worst areas in England are in London Screening uptake rate by NHS region NHS Region Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) Bowel Cancer Screening Programme uptake rate (%) Central Midlands NHS region NHS Bedfordshire CCG 59.1 NHS Corby CCG 54.0 NHS East And North Hertfordshire CCG 60.5 NHS East Leicestershire And Rutland CCG 64.0 NHS Herts Valleys CCG 59.0 NHS Leicester City CCG 44.9 NHS Lincolnshire East CCG 57.9 NHS Lincolnshire West CCG 60.8 NHS Luton CCG 48.4 NHS Milton Keynes CCG 54.8 NHS Nene CCG 59.7 NHS South Lincolnshire CCG 62.1 NHS South West Lincolnshire CCG 60.7 NHS West Leicestershire CCG 62.5 Cheshire and Merseyside NHS region NHS Eastern Cheshire CCG 61.6 NHS Halton CCG 50.1 NHS Knowsley CCG 47.6 NHS Liverpool CCG 48.8 NHS South Cheshire CCG 59.4 NHS South Sefton CCG 51.7 NHS Southport And Formby CCG 58.4 NHS St Helens CCG 55.2 NHS Vale Royal CCG 58.0 NHS Warrington CCG 56.2 NHS West Cheshire CCG 60.0 NHS Wirral CCG 54.5 Cumbria and North East NHS region NHS Cumbria CCG 64.4 NHS Darlington CCG 58.0 NHS Durham Dales, Easington And 59.9 Sedgefield CCG 1 NHS Hartlepool And Stockton-On-Tees 56.4 CCG NHS North Durham CCG 61.5 NHS North Tyneside CCG 58.1 NHS Northumberland CCG 63.5 NHS South Tees CCG 55.1 NHS South Tyneside CCG 55.9 NHS Sunderland CCG 55.9 East NHS region NHS Basildon And Brentwood CCG 58.5 NHS Cambridgeshire and Peterborough
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of Back Pain in England and Local Authorities
    MUSCULOSKELETAL CALCULATOR 26,632 Second Local Authority Bulletin estimated people Prevalence of back pain in England on The Isle of Wight and The Isle of Wight live with back pain SUMMARY Arthritis Research UK has partnered with Imperial College London to develop the Musculoskeletal Calculator, a prevalence modelling tool for musculoskeletal conditions. Data on the burden of musculoskeletal conditions are lacking and for the first time this prevalence model provides estimates of the burden of back pain to local areas. Key messages Low back pain is the leading cause of disability in the UK. Approximately 1 in 6 adults in England have some form of back pain. There’s variation in the prevalence of back pain across local authority areas in England. The prevalence of back pain can be reduced through tackling obesity 1in6 and improving physical activity. There also appears to be an association people in between smoking and back pain, but this doesn’t seem to be causative. England have The Musculoskeletal Calculator for back pain is the second of four local back pain datasets. The back pain estimates were preceded by estimates for knee and hip osteoarthritis, and will be followed by figures for rheumatoid arthritis and high risk fragility fractures. The Musculoskeletal Calculator is available at arthritisresearchuk.org/mskcalculator BACK PAIN IN ENGLAND Prevalence There’s variation in the prevalence of back pain at local authority level in England as estimated by the MSK Calculator. Approximately 1 in 6 people (16.9%) in England have back pain. This includes people of all ages and 9m all causes of back pain.* The prevalence varies across local authorities in estimated people England, ranging from 11.8% to 21.4%.
    [Show full text]
  • Isle of Wight Council CHILDREN’S SERVICES CHILDCARE SUFFICENCY ASSESSMENT 2014 - 2017
    Isle of Wight Council CHILDREN’S SERVICES CHILDCARE SUFFICENCY ASSESSMENT 2014 - 2017 CHILDCARE SUFFICIENCY REPORT – Select Committee – July 16th 2015 Document Information Title: Children’s Services Childcare Sufficiency Assessment Status: Final Current Version: V1 Author: Gillian Pink, Childcare Sufficiency Officer, Learnin & Development, Children’s Services Directorate [email protected] (01983) 823153 – (01983) 821000 - 8414 Sponsor: John Coughlan CBE, Director of Children’s Services Children’s Services Directorate [email protected] (01983) 821000 Consultation: 1nd March 2015 - 17th May 2015 Pre-schools Schools including parents o Via Questionnaire to parents Family Information Zone Approved by: Director of Children’s Services Approval Date: Review Refreshed every one year Frequency: Next Review: June 2016 Version History Version Date Description V1 3 June 2015 Initial draft V2 14. July 2015 Final draft V3 30 July 2015 Final 2 CHILDCARE SUFFICIENCY REPORT – Select Committee – July 16th 2015 Contents Document Information 2 Contents 3 1 Executive Summary 4 2 Introduction 6 3 What is Childcare 6 4 Local Context 7 5 Population - Demography 9 6 The Welfare Reform agenda and links with Childcare 10 7 Quality of Provision 18 8 Overview of Isle of Eight Early Years & Childcare Market 18 9 Early Years Education – Funding Trends 23 10 Average Childcare Costs 26 11 Provider Sustainability and Demand Trends 17 12 Growth of Places 20 Summary Appendix 1: Provider list Appendix 2 Indices of Multiple Deprivation Appendix 3 Early Years Single Funding Formula Factors Appendix 4 Help with childcare costs Appendix 5 Locality Map Vision Statement – Recommendation for Action Plan 3 CHILDCARE SUFFICIENCY REPORT – Select Committee – July 16th 2015 1.
    [Show full text]