Road Map to Effective Area-Based Management of Blue Water Fisheries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Road Map to Effective Area-Based Management of Blue Water Fisheries Road Map to Effective Area-Based Management of Blue Water Fisheries Including Workshop Proceedings January 5, 2021 Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council 1164 Bishop St., Suite 1400 Honolulu, HI 96813 PHONE: (808) 522-8220 FAX: (808) 522-8226 www.wpcouncil.org Cover Image: A report of the Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council 1164 Bishop Street, Suite 1400, Honolulu, HI 96813 Prepared by Mark Fitchett1, Ray Hilborn2, Eric Gilman3, Craig Severance4, Milani Chaloupka5, 6 7 8 Michel Kaiser , David Itano , and Kurt Schaefer 1Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council, Honolulu, Hawaii 2School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 3Pelagic Ecosystems Research Group, Honolulu, Hawaii 4 Emeritus: University of Hawaii, Hilo 5Ecological Modelling Services Pty Ltd & Marine Spatial Ecology Lab, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia 6Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom 7 Opah Consulting, Honolulu, Hawaii 8Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission Edited by Thomas Remington, Contractor, Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council © Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council 2021. All rights reserved. Published in the United States by the Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council. ISBN# 978-1-944827-78-6 CONCEPT NOTE FOR THE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON AREA- BASED MANAGEMENT OF BLUE WATER ECOSYSTEMS June 15-17, 2020, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA Background and Rationale As global demand for fisheries resources beyond continental shelves continues to increase, so does the need to effectively manage the blue water ecosystems that produce these valued resources. Blue water ecosystems span from the edge of continental shelves, often within States’ exclusive economic zones, to high seas waters beyond national jurisdiction. Unlike nearshore ecosystems, where fisheries resources are usually more static in distribution, regulatory enforcement is more tenable, and fishing effort is less distributed, blue water ecosystems pose a broader and more diverse array of challenges and scientific needs. Fishery resources in blue water ecosystems are often highly mobile and traverse jurisdictional boundaries, concentrate dynamically relative to ecosystem features, such as fronts, and have time-varying spatial vulnerabilities to multiple fisheries. As international competition and fishing capacities among distant water fishing fleets increase across jurisdictional boundaries, the desire to implement area-based management measures in blue water ecosystems has become a leading topic in fisheries management. Area-based management includes, but is not limited to, the use of marine protected areas, time-area closures, selective area-based fishery/gear closures, and adaptive/real- time management. International negotiations are underway to incorporate area-based management tools in blue water ecosystems, including closing areas to fishing, to improve the governance of natural resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction. The negotiations are a result of perceived pressures on the sustainability of natural resources in these areas, including from fisheries. At present, science-based guidelines to plan, evaluate, identify unintended consequences, and monitor area-based management implementation discussed in these negotiations are lacking. Such guidelines and decision-making tools are imperative for regional fisheries management organizations and arrangements (RFMO/As) to evaluate and weigh objectives, identify performance metrics, and develop plans to address consequences of spatial management. In order to elucidate appropriate employment of area-based management measures in blue water ecosystems, the first several sections of this report, “Road Map to Effective Area- Based Management in Blue Water Ecosystems”, was written by a team of experts and followed by a Workshop of global leaders on the subject matter. Objectives The Workshop and its “road map” document primarily focused on three basic management objectives to expand upon: (1) sustainably managing targeted fishery resources, (2) decreasing interactions with bycatch or non-targeted species, and (3) protecting specific critical habitat. The overarching objective of the Workshop was to develop science-based decision guidelines for managers to identify objectives as well as practical and effective approaches to employ area- based management measures as part of governance frameworks for natural resources in blue water ecosystems. These guidelines will help managers assess ecological, social, and economic responses in addition to the performance of static and dynamic area-based management measures to make informed decisions. Additional objectives of the Workshop included determining Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council – wpcouncil.org iii feasible performance metrics for area-based management, defining sufficient historical and continual data streams, identifying appropriate methods of evaluating management measures, evaluating enforcement and compliance monitoring capacity, and weighing costs/benefits of management objectives. Outcomes The Workshop acted as a forum for (1) identifying suitable objectives and pairing them with tenable area-based management measures, (2) developing a road map of a priori criteria for implementing effective area-based management and area-based management tools, (3) creating a compendium of the “state of knowledge” of area-based management tools with respect to three focused management objectives (expanded at the workshop), and (4) selecting appropriate means of evaluating the effects of area-based management measures. Workshop outcomes are also to be promulgated through future relevant RFMO and international meetings. Workshop Topics The following topics related to area-based management of activities in blue water ecosystems were included at the Workshop: • Identifying Conservation, Economic, and Social Objectives of Area-based Management • Identifying Feasible Performance Metrics • Weighing Management Objectives • Pragmatism of Area-based Management with Respect to Enforcement Capacity • Data Needs for Robust Evaluations on Effects of Area-based Management Measures • Counterfactual/Potential Outcomes Analyses • Social Implications • Adaptive-Dynamic Real Time Area-based Management Workshop Hosts, Participants, and Audience of Output The Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management hosted the Workshop. There were twenty- five participants with expertise in research disciplines of relevance to the Workshop themes invited to participate in the invitation-only Workshop, reflecting an attempt to achieve balance by region, gender, and stakeholder groups. Working Language The meeting was held in English only. Timing and Duration The Workshop took place over three days from June 15 to 17, 2020. Venue The meeting venue was the conference room at the Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council, 1164 Bishop Street, Suite #1400, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. iv Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council – wpcouncil.org TABLE OF CONTENTS Concept Note for the International Workshop on Area-Based Management of Blue Water Ecosystems ..................................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ v Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................ vii Table of Tables ............................................................................................................................. vii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................. ix Road map to Effective Area-Based Management in Blue Water Ecosystems ............................... 1 Chapter 1. Introduction and Summary ............................................................................................ 1 Area-Based Management in Blue Water Fisheries ..................................................................... 1 International Ocean Governance and Implementation of Area-Based Management Tools ....... 2 ABMT by Regional Fisheries Management Organizations .................................................... 2 International Governance in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction ......................................... 4 Chapter 2. Objectives and Performance Metrics for Spatial Management ..................................... 7 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Objectives ................................................................................................................................... 7 Performance Metrics ................................................................................................................. 11 Summary Table ......................................................................................................................... 12 Discussion ................................................................................................................................. 13 Chapter 3. Designs of Spatio-Temporal Management Measures for Blue Water Fisheries ......... 15 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Sturgeon Chub (Macrhybopsis Gelida): a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Sturgeon Chub (Macrhybopsis gelida): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project August 31, 2004 Frank J. Rahel and Laura A. Thel Department of Zoology and Physiology University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071 Peer Review Administered by American Fisheries Society Rahel, F.J. and L.A. Thel. (2004, August 31). Sturgeon Chub (Macrhybopsis gelida): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/ projects/scp/assessments/sturgeonchub.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank biologists from Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, and Wyoming, and from the national forests and national grasslands within Region 2 who provided information about sturgeon chub within their jurisdictions. We especially thank Gregory Hayward and Richard Vacirca of the USDA Forest Service for their review of this species assessment. Comments also were provided by two anonymous reviewers. David B. McDonald of the University of Wyoming provided the population demographic matrix analysis. AUTHORS’ BIOGRAPHIES Frank J. Rahel is a professor in the Department of Zoology and Physiology at the University of Wyoming where he teaches courses in fi sheries management, ichthyology, and conservation biology. His research interests are centered around fi sh ecology and the infl uence of anthropogenic disturbances on fi sh assemblages. Laura A. Thel is a graduate research assistant in the Department of Zoology and Physiology at the University of Wyoming with research interests involving stream ecology, hydrology, and landscape ecology, especially as these are related to the management of native fi shes. COVER PHOTO CREDIT Sturgeon Chub (Macrhybopsis gelida).
    [Show full text]
  • IGFA Angling Rules
    International Angling Rules The following angling rules have been formulated by the International Game Fish Association to promote ethical and sporting angling practices, to establish uniform regulations for the compilation of world game fish records, and to provide basic angling guidelines for use in fishing tournaments and any other group angling activities. The word “angling” is defined as catching or attempting to catch fish with a rod, reel, line, and hook as outlined in the international angling rules. There are some aspects of angling that cannot be controlled through rule making, however. Angling regulations cannot insure an outstanding performance from each fish, and world records cannot indicate the amount of difficulty in catching the fish. Captures in which the fish has not fought or has not had a chance to fight do not reflect credit on the fisherman, and only the angler can properly evaluate the degree of achievement in establishing the record. Only fish caught in accordance with IGFA international angling rules, and within the intent of these rules, will be considered for world records. Following are the rules for freshwater and saltwater fishing and a separate set of rules for fly fishing. RULES FOR FISHING IN FRESH AND SALT WATER (Also see Rules for Fly fishing) E. ROD Equipment Regulations 1. Rods must comply with sporting ethics and customs. A. LINE Considerable latitude is allowed in the choice of a rod, but rods giving 1. Monofilament, multifilament, and lead core multifilament the angler an unfair advantage will be disqualified. This rule is lines may be used. For line classes, see World Record Requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • New and Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Fisheries: a Comprehensive Landscape Analysis
    Photo by Pablo Sanchez Quiza New and Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Fisheries: A Comprehensive Landscape Analysis Environmental Defense Fund | Oceans Technology Solutions | April 2021 New and Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Fisheries: A Comprehensive Landscape Analysis Authors: Christopher Cusack, Omisha Manglani, Shems Jud, Katie Westfall and Rod Fujita Environmental Defense Fund Nicole Sarto and Poppy Brittingham Nicole Sarto Consulting Huff McGonigal Fathom Consulting To contact the authors please submit a message through: edf.org/oceans/smart-boats edf.org | 2 Contents List of Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................7 2. Transformative Technologies......................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Sensors ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Satellite remote sensing ...........................................................................................................................12 2.3 Data Collection Platforms ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ottawa: Complete List of Seafood Samples
    Ottawa: complete list of seafood samples Sold as Identified as (BOLD) Common name (CFIA Mislabelled Purchase (label/menu/server) market name) location Arctic char Salverus alpirus Arctic char (Arctic char, No Restaurant char) Arctic char Salverus alpirus Arctic char (Arctic char, No Restaurant char) Arctic char Salverus alpirus Arctic char (Arctic char, No Restaurant char) Arctic char Salverus alpirus Arctic char (Arctic char, No Grocery char) Store Butterfish Lepidocybium Escolar (Escolar, Snake Yes Restaurant flavobrunneum Mackerel) Cod, Fogo Island Gadus morhua Atlantic cod (Atlantic cod, No Restaurant cod) Cod, Atlantic Gadus morhua Atlantic cod (Atlantic cod, No Restaurant cod) Cod, Icelandic Gadus morhua Atlantic cod (Atlantic cod, No Restaurant cod) Cod, Atlantic Gadus morhua Atlantic cod (Atlantic cod, No Restaurant cod) (food truck) Cod, Atlantic Gadus macrocephalus Pacific cod (Pacific cod, cod) Yes Restaurant Cod, Pacific Micromesistius australis Southern blue whiting Yes Restaurant (Southern blue whiting, Blue whiting, Blue cod) Cod, Norwegian Gadus morhua Atlantic cod (Atlantic cod, No Restaurant cod) Cod, Atlantic Gadus morhua Atlantic cod (Atlantic cod, No Restaurant cod) Cod, Atlantic Gadus morhua Atlantic cod (Atlantic cod, No Restaurant cod) Cod, Alaskan Gadus macrocephalus Pacific cod (Pacific cod, cod) No Grocery Store Cod, Pacific Gadus macrocephalus Pacific cod (Pacific cod, cod) No Grocery Store Cod, North Atlantic Gadus macrocephalus Pacific cod (Pacific cod, cod) Yes Restaurant Cod Gadus macrocephalus Pacific cod (Pacific cod, cod) No Grocery Store Cod, Icelandic Gadus morhua Atlantic cod (Atlantic cod, No Grocery cod) Store Cod, Icelandic Gadus morhua Atlantic cod (Atlantic cod, No Grocery cod) Store Euro Bass Gadus morhua Atlantic cod (Atlantic cod, Yes Restaurant cod) Grouper Epinephelus diacanthus Spinycheek grouper (n/a) Yes – E.
    [Show full text]
  • IATTC-94-01 the Tuna Fishery, Stocks, and Ecosystem in the Eastern
    INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION 94TH MEETING Bilbao, Spain 22-26 July 2019 DOCUMENT IATTC-94-01 REPORT ON THE TUNA FISHERY, STOCKS, AND ECOSYSTEM IN THE EASTERN PACIFIC OCEAN IN 2018 A. The fishery for tunas and billfishes in the eastern Pacific Ocean ....................................................... 3 B. Yellowfin tuna ................................................................................................................................... 50 C. Skipjack tuna ..................................................................................................................................... 58 D. Bigeye tuna ........................................................................................................................................ 64 E. Pacific bluefin tuna ............................................................................................................................ 72 F. Albacore tuna .................................................................................................................................... 76 G. Swordfish ........................................................................................................................................... 82 H. Blue marlin ........................................................................................................................................ 85 I. Striped marlin .................................................................................................................................... 86 J. Sailfish
    [Show full text]
  • CBD Technical Series No. 87 Assessing Progress Towards Aichi Biodiversity Target 6 on Sustainable Marine Fisheries
    Secretariat of the CBD Technical Series No. 87 Convention on Biological Diversity ASSESSING PROGRESS87 TOWARDS AICHI BIODIVERSITY TARGET 6 ON SUSTAINABLE MARINE FISHERIES CBD Technical Series No. 87 Assessing Progress towards Aichi Biodiversity Target 6 on Sustainable Marine Fisheries Serge M. Garcia and Jake Rice Fisheries Expert Group of the IUCN Commission of Ecosystem Management Published by the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity ISBN: 9789292256616 Copyright © 2020, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views reported in this publication do not necessarily represent those of the Convention on Biological Diversity. This publication may be reproduced for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holders, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The Secretariat of the Convention would appreciate receiving a copy of any publications that use this document as a source. Citation Garcia, S.M. and Rice, J. 2020. Assessing Progress towards Aichi Biodiversity Target 6 on Sustainable Marine Fisheries. Technical Series No. 87. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, 103 pages For further information, please contact: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity World Trade Centre 413 St. Jacques Street, Suite 800 Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2Y 1N9 Phone: 1(514) 288 2220 Fax: 1 (514) 288 6588 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.cbd.int This publication was made possible thanks to financial assistance from the Government of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Skipjack Tuna, Yellowfin Tuna, Swordfish Western and Central
    Skipjack tuna, Yellowfin tuna, Swordfish Katsuwonus pelamis, Thunnus albacares, Xiphias gladius ©Monterey Bay Aquarium Western and Central Pacific Troll/Pole, Handlines July 11, 2017 (updated January 8, 2018) Seafood Watch Consulting Researcher Disclaimer Seafood Watch® strives to have all Seafood Reports reviewed for accuracy and completeness by external scientists with expertise in ecology, fisheries science and aquaculture. Scientific review, however, does not constitute an endorsement of the Seafood Watch® program or its recommendations on the part of the reviewing scientists. Seafood Watch® is solely responsible for the conclusions reached in this report. Seafood Watch Standard used in this assessment: Standard for Fisheries vF2 Table of Contents About. Seafood. .Watch . 3. Guiding. .Principles . 4. Summary. 5. Final. Seafood. .Recommendations . 6. Introduction. 8. Assessment. 12. Criterion. 1:. .Impacts . on. the. species. .under . .assessment . .12 . Criterion. 2:. .Impacts . on. other. .species . .18 . Criterion. 3:. .Management . Effectiveness. .23 . Criterion. 4:. .Impacts . on. the. habitat. and. .ecosystem . .29 . Acknowledgements. 32. References. 33. Appendix. A:. Updated. January. 8,. .2017 . 36. 2 About Seafood Watch Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch® program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch® defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch® makes its science-based recommendations available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from www.seafoodwatch.org. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • FOP Interreg EU Associate Member 2008 a Little Bit of History...The EII 20 Years of Seafood Certification
    FOP Interreg EU Associate Member 2008 A little bit of History...the EII 20 Years of Seafood Certification 1986 DOLPHIN-SAFE Monitoring of the Tuna Industry WW to verify that tuna is caught without harming marine mammals Achievements 98% decrease in dolphin mortality (2M dolphins saved) 95% of Worldwide Tuna Industry and Retailers participate 1991 MANGROVE ACTION PROJECT Promotion of Sustainable Shrimp Aquaculture Achievements 100 aquaculture plants converted to sustainability in Indonesia and Thailand 1994 TURTLE-SAFE Certification of SHRIMP fished with Trawler / Turtle Excluders Devices (TEDs) Achievements No more Turtle mortality in the American Mexican Gulf Shrimp Fleet (from approx. 15.000 per year). 2006 Certification of Products from Sustainable Fisheries and Aquaculture Fish, fresh Fish, preserves Fish, canned Fish, smoked Fish, frozen Sushi Seafood Eggs, caviar Fish Oils Fishmeal The only Industry-wide Certification Scheme The only scheme for both wild and farmed Scheme Wild- Farmed Fishfeed Market caught (Bio in Potential 2010) Friend of the Sea YES YES YES 100% Others wild-catch YES NO NO 50% Others bio-aqua NO YES NO 50% FISHERIES Artisanal Industrial AQUACULTURE Offshore Inland The Market Leader Certification Scheme Metric Tons of Positively Audited Origins Nr 1. Certification Scheme WW WILD-CAUGHT – APPROVED FISHERIES CATCH Peruvian Anchovies – 8.000.000 MT Menhaden – 640.000 MT Pacific Salmon – 300.000 MT European Pilchard – Sardine, Morocco – 760.000 MT Chub Mackerel – 100.000 MT Anchovy, Croatia - 100.000 MT Norway Shrimps – 40.000 MT Skipjack Tuna Pole and Line, Azores, Senegal, Phil. – 25.000 MT TOT APPROX: 10.000.000 MT (+10% of WW Catch) FARMED – APPROVED SITES PRODUCTION Mussels Galicia – 300.000 MT Stolt Seafarm Turbot – 4.000 MT Leroy Cod – 2.500 MT Sturgeon Agroittica – 500 MT Caviar Agroittica – 23 MT Others (Seabream, Sea bass, Trout, Salmon, Halibut, Kingfish) TOT APPROX: 500.000 MT Approved Artisanal Fisheries IRELAND VIETNAM AZORES SENEGAL BRASIL SRI LANKA MALDIVES INDONESIA The Market Leader Certification Scheme Nr of Cert.
    [Show full text]
  • Physico-Chemical Characteristics and Fatty Acid Profiles of Smoked
    International Journal of ChemTech Research CODEN (USA): IJCRGG ISSN: 0974-4290 Vol.8, No.1, pp 356-361, 2015 Physico-Chemical Characteristics and Fatty Acid Profiles of Smoked Skipjack Tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) from Several Producers in Bitung Municipality, North Sulawesi, Indonesia Netty Salindeho1* and Christine F. Mamuaja2 1Fisheries Product Technology, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado, North Sulawesi, Indonesia. 2Departmentof Agricultural Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado, North Sulawesi, Indonesia Abstract: This study was aimed to analyze the physico-chemical characteristics and fatty acid profiles of the skipjack tuna smoked using smoking material of coconut skin under traditional smoking technique of three producers (A, B, and C), in Bitung Municipality, North Sulawesi. The skipjack tuna smoked produced by Producer A contained the lowest water content andaw, and the highest protein, fat, and ash contentand no significant difference (P<0.05) from those of Producer B and C.The fatty acid profile of the smoked skipjack of Producer Ashowed the lowest total saturated fatty acid (SFA) and the highestmonounsaturated fatty acid (MUFAandpolyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) and it was significantly different (P<005) from Producer B and Producer C. Keywords : skipjack tuna, smoking, fatty acid profile, coconut skin. Introduction Fish smoking is one of the oldest fish processing technology traditionally done for many years. Smoking can be defined as volatile compound penetration process into the fish meat generated from wood burning which is known to be able to produce specific taste and aroma. Some phenolic contetn, formaldehyde, and other compoundsabsorbed in the flesh derived from smokes act as preservatives to prolong the storage duration of the end product and give peculiar good flavor with typical aroma produced by the smoking processs3.
    [Show full text]
  • Myxosporea: Ceratomyxidae) to Encompass Freshwater Species C
    Erection of Ceratonova n. gen. (Myxosporea: Ceratomyxidae) to Encompass Freshwater Species C. gasterostea n. sp. from Threespine Stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) and C. shasta n. comb. from Salmonid Fishes Atkinson, S. D., Foott, J. S., & Bartholomew, J. L. (2014). Erection of Ceratonova n. gen.(Myxosporea: Ceratomyxidae) to Encompass Freshwater Species C. gasterostea n. sp. from Threespine Stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) and C. shasta n. comb. from Salmonid Fishes. Journal of Parasitology, 100(5), 640-645. doi:10.1645/13-434.1 10.1645/13-434.1 American Society of Parasitologists Accepted Manuscript http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse Manuscript Click here to download Manuscript: 13-434R1 AP doc 4-21-14.doc RH: ATKINSON ET AL. – CERATONOVA GASTEROSTEA N. GEN. N. SP. ERECTION OF CERATONOVA N. GEN. (MYXOSPOREA: CERATOMYXIDAE) TO ENCOMPASS FRESHWATER SPECIES C. GASTEROSTEA N. SP. FROM THREESPINE STICKLEBACK (GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS) AND C. SHASTA N. COMB. FROM SALMONID FISHES S. D. Atkinson, J. S. Foott*, and J. L. Bartholomew Department of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Nash Hall 220, Corvallis, Oregon 97331. Correspondence should be sent to: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Ceratonova gasterostea n. gen. n. sp. is described from the intestine of freshwater Gasterosteus aculeatus L. from the Klamath River, California. Myxospores are arcuate, 22.4 +/- 2.6 µm thick, 5.2 +/- 0.4 µm long, posterior angle 45 +/- 24°, with 2 sub-spherical polar capsules, diameter 2.3 +/- 0.2 µm, which lie adjacent to the suture. Its ribosomal small subunit sequence was most similar to an intestinal parasite of salmonid fishes, Ceratomyxa shasta (97%, 1,671/1,692 nt), and distinct from all other Ceratomyxa species (<85%), which are typically coelozoic parasites in the gall bladder or urinary system of marine fishes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development and Decline of Hawaii's Skipjack Tuna Fishery
    The Development and Decline of Hawaii's Skipjack Tuna Fishery CHRISTOFER H. BOGGS and BERT S. KIKKAWA Introduction the Hawaii skipjack tuna catch was and frequent spawning (Hunter et aI., small compared with the total Pacific 1986). Unlike populations of larger Historically, the pole-and-line, live­ catch of this species (ca. 870,000 t in tuna species (Miyabe, In press; Suzuki, bait fishery for skipjack tuna, 1990; IATTC, 1992; Hampton, In In press) and marlins (Suzuki, 1989), Katsuwonus pelamis, was the largest press). skipjack tuna appear to be underexploited commercial fishery in Hawaii. Annual The Hawaii skipjack tuna fishery (Kleiber et aI., 1983; Hampton, In pole-and-line landings of skipjack tuna originally supplied only the local mar­ press). The absence of regulation in exceeded 2,500 metric tons (t) or 5.5 ket for fresh and dried tuna. The fish­ Hawaii's skipjack tuna fishery contrasts million Ib from 1937 to 1973 (June, ery expanded in the 1900' s because with the management of Hawaii's fish­ 1951; Yamashita, 1958; Uchida, 1976; 1 the ready availability of skipjack tuna eries for other tunas and billfish (Boggs Skillman, 1987; Kikkawa ), except was sufficient to support a cannery and Ito, 1993), and is justified by the during World War II (1941--45). The which provided access to outside mar­ apparent underexploitation of the stock record production of 7,400 t (16.3 mil­ kets. A sustained drop in the catch per and the declining size of the local fish­ lion Ib) of all species landed in 1965 unit effort (CPUE) of large (>6.8 kg, ery.
    [Show full text]
  • SKIPJACK TUNA (Katsuwonus Pelamis) Region: Indian Ocean IOTC Status 2014: Not Subject to Overfishing[1]
    © WETJENS DIMMLICH / W WF SFI WF FACTSHEET APRIL 2015 Smart Fishing Initiative (SFI): species overview SKIPJACK TUNA (Katsuwonus pelamis) Region: Indian Ocean IOTC status 2014: not subject to overfishing[1] Accounting for nearly half of global tuna production[4], Katsuwonus pelamis (skipjack tuna) are the most abundant and fast-growing of the commercial tuna species, common in tropical waters throughout the world where it inhabits surface waters in large shoals[1]. Caught mainly using purse seine nets, gill nets or bait boats, over 90% of skipjack catches are destined for canning[4]. Though current catch data is not available, 2012 numbers provided by the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) indicated that skipjack stocks are not currently overfished in the Indian Ocean[1]. IMAGE SOURCE: WIKIPEDIA[2] Appearance & size The back and lateral line of skipjack are a dark, almost purplish blue, while their lower sides and belly are silver with 4 to 6 dark longitudinal lines (may appear as dark blotches in live fish). The fusiform body is elongated, rounded and scaleless except for the corselet and lateral line. Skipjack are typified by two dorsal fins separated by a short interspace (the first with 14-16 spines, the second followed by 7-9 finlets), anal fins followed by 7-9 finlets, and a strong keel on each side of the caudal fin base between two smaller keels[3]. Rapid-growing, individual skipjack with a fork length of 80 cm and a weight of 8-10 kg are common, while maximum fork length is 110 cm and weight is 35.5 kg[1].
    [Show full text]