DOCSLIB.ORG

1.0 Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1.0 Introduction Skeena Watershed Conservation Coalition P.O. Box 70 Hazelton, B.C. V0J 1Y0 www.skeenawatershed.com 250.842.2494 March 10, 2014 Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 410-701 Georgia Street West Vancouver, BC V7Y 1C6 Via email: [email protected] Honourable Catherine McKenna Minster of Environment and Climate Change Via email: [email protected] Honorable Hunter Tootoo Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard Ottawa, Ontario <Original signed by> Via email: [email protected]. Honourable James Carr, Minister of Natural Resources Via email: [email protected] Pacific Northwest LNG Project – Public Comments re CEAA draft Environmental Assessment Report From: Skeena Watershed Conservation Coalition CEAA Reference: 80032 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Skeena Watershed Conservation Coalition Skeena Watershed Conservation Coalition (SWCC) is a diverse group of people living and working in the Skeena River watershed. Our board of directors and membership reflect the broad interests of the people in this region. We are united in understanding that short term industrial development plans, even 50 year plans, will not benefit our region in the long run if they undermine the social and environmental fabric that holds the watershed and its communities together. SWCC’s mission is to cultivate a sustainable future from a sustainable environment rooted in culture and a wild salmon ecosystem. Objectives and strategies arising from this 1 mission include educating the public and decision-makers in order to increase awareness and understanding of the natural ecological and human assets that currently exist, as well as helping to create a vibrant and resilient future for the Skeena watershed. SWCC has previously reviewed the Pacific NorthWest LNG (PNW LNG) Project Application/Environmental Impact Statement (Application/EIS) which describes the project and the potential environmental, social, economic, cultural, and health-related effects of all phases of the project under contract with a CEAA Contribution Agreement. Those comments were delivered to CEAA on May 1, 2014. The following written comments are in regard to the review of the CEAA draft Environmental Assessment report dated February 2016. As there were major conceptual changes to the proposed PNW LNG project, and subsequently, supplemental information to review, SWCC contracted dr. Marvin Rosenau to conduct a review of the project pier, berth, and jetty, and as such, his review is appended to this submission. 1.2 Pacific NorthWest LNG Project Pacific NorthWest LNG Ltd. proposes to construct and operate a liquefied natural gas (LNG) facility and marine terminal near Prince Rupert, within the district of Port Edward. The Pacific NorthWest LNG facility would be located on Lelu Island. The proposed project would convert natural gas to LNG for export to Pacific Rim markets in Asia. The Pacific NorthWest LNG Project is subject to review under both the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 (CEAA 2012) and B.C.'s Environmental Assessment Act and as such, has undergone a joint environmental assessment process. 1.3 SWCC’s Previous EIS Comment Summary― May 1, 2014 SWCC’s assessment of the PNW LNG Project Application/EIS found an inadequacy and insufficiency of baseline data as set out in the EIS Guidelines and Application Information Requirements, particularly in regard to Sections 1, 2, 13, 15, and 19. Adequate and sufficient baseline data are critical to the environmental assessment process due to the required subsequent effects assessment and cumulative effects – both of which revolve around and depend on complete and sufficient baseline data. The lack of adequate baseline data has led to faulty conclusions regarding the effects assessment, the cumulative effects assessment, predicted residual effects, and the conclusions in regard to the Valued Components. Much of the effects assessment is based on professional opinion and does not reflect adequate science and guiding federal policies such as the precautionary principle. The quality of science in the Application/EIS is very low level and does nothing at all to provide confidence in the proposed mitigation measures and habitat offsets. Due to the proposed project’s location at the mouth of the Skeena River, which is an internationally significant salmon producing river, potential adverse effects are inadequately addressed at a basic level. The marine environment adjacent to the 2 proposed project is considered a biological hotspot in relation to the overall Skeena estuary and the BC Northcoast. Over the last forty years, numerous studies led by the federal government and development proponents have concluded that the Skeena River estuary is one of the most biologically productive areas on the BC Pacific coast. These past studies have noted the many potential adverse impacts to marine resources if development were to be located on Lelu Island and/or Flora Bank. However, the PNW LNG Application/EIS are in substantial disagreement with those studies. It is considered pointless to attempt to interpret why this current study is in strong conflict with past effects conclusions at the species, habitat, and ecosystem levels. SWCC considers the Application/EIS inadequate; the baseline data needs to be developed and then thoroughly evaluated as to potential impacts and effects. The rush to develop LNG facilities on the north coast has resulted in compromised data collection, and hurried analysis and interpretation. SWCC’s concern with sound and quality decision-making in the Skeena estuary converges with Fisheries Act and Canadian Environmental Protection Act legislation and with the long-term sustainability of the Skeena watershed, Skeena estuary, and the BC north coast. SWCC argues that the proposed LNG plant should not be situated in the Skeena estuary. 2.0 SWCC Comments to the CEAA draft Environmental Assessment Report ― February 2016 2.1 General Comments SWCC considers that the environmental assessment process leading up to the draft Environmental Assessment Report (EAR) continues to utilize weak or non-existent baseline data. Though the information base improved throughout the process, there is still a lack of fundamental understanding in regard to: • the Skeena River discharge; • the transport of sediment by Skeena River discharge; • the deposition of said sediment on the estuary sediment banks and delta front; • the effects of Skeena discharge flows on other prevailing currents such as tidal, wind-driven, and upstream saline water entrainment into the Skeena River; • the variability of large snowmelt events creating large Skeena flood flows that re- mobilize stored sediments in the inner portion of the estuary and re-deposit them in various drying and wetted banks. SWCC considers the data noted above as critical to understanding what effects, if any, would result from changes to the environment caused by the proposed project. Given the tight timelines set out in both the BC and Canada environmental assessment processes, the responsibility falls on the project proponent to collect adequate baseline data and 3 therefore be prepared with the EIS Application. However, in this case the proponent was not adequately prepared. In the course of SWCC’s review of the Application and review of the draft EAR, SWCC has unanswered and lingering questions regarding the proponents assessment of effects, including social, economic, cultural, environmental, and health-related effects, which appear to tainted by subjective opinions and conclusions. As such, the PNW LNG EA process appears to fail in identifying the potential impacts of the proposed development, particularly in relation to, or linked to changes to climate that are currently existing in the Skeena area, and in conjunction with other development processes, such as the other seven proposed LNG terminals, the two approved gas pipes (Spectra and PRGT), and other related port developments that cumulatively act to infringe on ecological integrity in the inner and mid-estuary areas. There is no lack of science denoting the high value habitat that supports juvenile salmon in and adjacent to Lelu Island. However, the draft CEAA report does not take note of this fact. Nor does the draft CEAA report take note of the past and current impacts to juvenile salmon habitat. For example, the amount of shoreline that has been hardened by development over the last three decades is relatively large. There is no lack of science proving that shoreline hardening is detrimental to juvenile salmon. But who is talking about it? This is effectively obliteration of excellent critical habitat that sustains Skeena salmon abundance. PNW LNG wishes to continue this tradition of impacting habitat. Yet the draft CEAA EAR does not appear to take note of the finest juvenile salmon habitat on the BC north coast. It is strange that Environment Canada and the Canada department of Fisheries and Oceans (dFO) of the day (in the 1970s) made note of the excellent habitat and recommended against development of the inner and mid-estuary area. SWCC notes that the cherry-picking of select science by the proponent, and to all appearances by CEAA, has tainted the EA process. SWCC questions why the abundance, the condition, and the genetic diversity of the many juvenile salmon caught and analysed by the Lax Kw’alaams/Skeena Fisheries Commission/ SFU joint venture did not provide meaningful discussion in the draft CEAA EAR? It is important to note that the majority of those juvenile fish, particularly the sockeye, came from populations that are currently denoted at risk and are managed under Sockeye Recovery Plans, of which dFO is an important partner. These populations include the Lakelse, Kitwanga, Morice-Nanika, and the Babine wild stocks. The latter stocks comprise by far, the largest sockeye stocks in the Skeena watershed. There does not seem to be much sense involved here; on one hand there are up-river recovery plans being funded and implemented in conjunction with Canada dFO, various First Nations, and the international Pacific Salmon Treaty–Pacific Salmon Commission 4 Northern Fund.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pacific Northwest LNG Project
    Pacific NorthWest LNG Project Environmental Assessment Report September 2016 Cover photo credited to Pacific NorthWest LNG Ltd. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Catalogue No: En106-136/2015E-PDF ISBN: 978-1-100-25630-6 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial purposes, and in any format, without charge or further permission. Unless otherwise specified, you may not reproduce materials, in whole or in part, for the purpose of commercial redistribution without prior written permission from the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3 or info@ceaa- acee.gc.ca This document has been issued in French under the title: Projet de gaz naturel liquéfié Pacific NorthWest - Rapport d’évaluation environnementale Executive Summary Pacific NorthWest LNG Limited Partnership (the proponent) is proposing the construction, operation, and decommissioning of a new facility for the liquefaction, storage, and export of liquefied natural gas (LNG). The Pacific NorthWest LNG Project (the Project) is proposed to be located primarily on federal lands and waters administered by the Prince Rupert Port Authority approximately 15 kilometres south of Prince Rupert, British Columbia. At full production, the facility would receive approximately 3.2 billion standard cubic feet per day, or 9.1 x 107 cubic metres per day, of pipeline grade natural gas, and produce up to 20.5 million tonnes per annum of LNG for over 30 years. The Project would include the construction and operation of a marine terminal for loading LNG on to vessels for export to Pacific Rim markets in Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific North West LNG Project: a Review and Assessment of the Project Plans and Their Potential Impacts on Marine Fish and Fish Habitat in the Skeena Estuary
    Pacific North West LNG Project: A review and assessment of the project plans and their potential impacts on marine fish and fish habitat in the Skeena estuary. Asit Mazumder Professor Department of Biology University of Victoria Victoria June 2016 1 Table of Contents I. Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 II. The Existing Environment ........................................................................................................................ 4 III. Project Design ............................................................................................................................................ 5 IV. Potential Effects on Marine Fish and ........................................................................ Fish Habitat 8 Deleted: 9 Marine Structure Impacts on Sediment Transport ish and F Habitat ........................................................ 10 V. Conceptual Fish Habitat Offsetting ................................................................................. Strategy 16 Deleted: 15 VI. CEAA Assessment of PNW-­‐‑LNG Proposal on ............................................ Marine Resources 20 Deleted: 19 VII. Conclusions of the Review .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Environmental Implications of Sediment Transport in the Waters Of
    Journal of Coastal Research 32 3 465–482 Coconut Creek, Florida May 2016 The Environmental Implications of Sediment Transport in the Waters of Prince Rupert, British Columbia, Canada: A Comparison Between Kinematic and Dynamic Approaches Patrick McLaren SedTrend Analysis Limited Brentwood Bay, BC V8M1C5, Canada [email protected] ABSTRACT McLaren, P., 2016. The environmental implications of sediment transport in the waters of Prince Rupert, British Columbia, Canada: A comparison between kinematic and dynamic approaches. Journal of Coastal Research, 32(3), 465– 482. Coconut Creek (Florida), ISSN 0749-0208. A Sediment Trend Analysis (STAt) was performed on 2474 grain-size distributions taken from the Port of Prince Rupert, British Columbia, Canada. The analysis was commissioned by the Lax Kw’alaams First Nations Band because of environmental concerns associated with future large-scale development plans, including a proposed liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal associated with Flora Bank. Located at the mouth of the Skeena River, Flora Bank has long been considered an important nursery area for juvenile salmon. STA is an empirical technique to determine patterns of net sediment transport, which may provide a qualitative assessment of the possible environmental changes that could be expected following port construction. The patterns of transport revealed that sediments throughout the study area are derived from underlying till which is exposed in areas of strong currents. Flora Bank, a roughly 4 km2 area of intertidal sand, contained the coarsest and most well sorted sand, which was not found elsewhere throughout the study area. Although derived from till, the sand did not form transport pathways from the other sediment types; in addition, pathways could not be determined on the bank itself.
    [Show full text]
  • SFU Library Thesis Template
    Abiotic and biotic dimensions of habitat for juvenile salmon and other fishes in the Skeena River estuary by Ciara Elizabeth Sharpe B.Sc. (Hons.), University of Victoria, 2012 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in the Department of Biological Sciences Faculty of Science © Ciara Elizabeth Sharpe 2017 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Fall 2017 i Approval Name: Ciara Elizabeth Sharpe Degree: Master of Science Title: Abiotic and biotic dimensions of habitat for juvenile salmon and other fishes in the Skeena River estuary Examining Committee: Chair: Dr. Wendy Palen Associate Professor Dr. Jonathan Moore Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Dr. Isabelle Côté Supervisor Professor Dr. Douglas Braun Internal Examiner Adjunct Professor School of Resource and Environmental Management Date Defended/Approved: December 11, 2017 ii Ethics Statement iii Abstract Estuaries are increasingly degraded globally but provide nursery services for juvenile fishes through predator protection and increased food availability. This thesis examined the abiotic and biotic factors that contributed to abundance patterns of juvenile salmon and forage fish species in the Skeena River estuary, BC. I first showed that spatial abundance patterns were heterogeneous for salmon and that the combination of variables that predicted abundance differed between species. Inclusion of these dynamic abiotic and biotic variables increased predictive power over solely using static habitat descriptors for juvenile salmon. Next, I examined the association between fish and prey abundance for two forage fish and juvenile salmon species. Overall, fish abundance was not related to prey abundance, except for herring which co-varied with a highly consumed prey species.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Data Report: Marine Resources
    APPENDIX M – PART 1 APPENDIX M Technical Data Report - Marine Resources PACIFIC NORTHWEST LNG Technical Data Report – Marine Resources Prepared for: Prepared by: Pacific NorthWest LNG Limited Partnership Stantec Consulting Ltd. Oceanic Plaza, Suite 1900 - 1066 West Hastings Street 4370 Dominion Street, Suite 500 Vancouver, BC V6E 3X1 Burnaby, BC V5G 4L7 Tel: (778) 372-4700 | Fax: (604) 630-3181 Tel: (604) 436-3014 | Fax: (604) 436-3752 Project No.: Date: 1231-10537 February 17, 2014 Pacific NorthWest LNG Technical Data Report – Marine Resources Authorship AUTHORSHIP Philip Molloy, B.Sc., Ph.D. ................................................................................... Co-Lead Author Aimee Gromack, B.Sc., MMM ............................................................................. Co-Lead Author Conor McCracken, B.Sc., BIT .................................................................................... Contributor William Brewis, Dip., B.Sc., M.Sc. ............................................................................. Contributor Rowenna Gryba, B.Sc., M.Sc. ................................................................................... Contributor Marc Skinner, C.D., M.Sc... ........................................................................................ Contributor Heather Ward, B.Sc., M.Sc. ....................................................................................... Contributor Christine Gruman, B.Sc., MRM .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Skeena River Estuary
    Morphodynamics of a Bedrock Confined Estuary and Delta: The Skeena River Estuary by Amanda Lily Wild B.Sc., University of Victoria, 2018 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science In the Department of Geography ©Amanda Wild, 2020 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. Morphodynamics of a Bedrock Confined Estuary and Delta: The Skeena River Estuary By Amanda Lily Wild B.Sc., University of Victoria, 2018 Supervisory Committee Dr. Eva Kwoll, Co-Supervisor Department of Geography Dr. Gwyn Lintern, Co-Supervisor Natural Resources Canada ii Abstract Bedrock islands add variation to the estuarine system that results in deviations from typical unconfined estuarine sediment transport patterns. Limited literature exists regarding the dynamics of seabed morphology, delta formation, sediment divergence patterns, and sedimentary facies classifications of non-fjordic bedrock confined systems. Such knowledge is critical to address coastal management concerns adequately. This research presents insights from the Skeena Estuary, a macrotidal estuary in northwestern Canada with a high fluvial sediment input (21.2-25.5 Mtyr-1). Descriptions on sub-environments, stratification, and sediment accumulation within the Skeena Estuary utilize HydroTrend model outputs of riverine sediment and discharge, Natural Resources Canada radiocarbon-dated sediment cores and grain size samples, and acoustic Doppler current profiler and conductivity-temperature-depth measurements from three field campaigns. Research findings delineate a fragmented delta structure with elongated mudflats and select areas of slope instability. Variations from well-mixed water circulation to lateral stratification, govern the slack tide flow transition and sediment transport pathways within seaward and landward passages of the estuary.
    [Show full text]
  • ID # Comment Commenter Comment Final Proponent Response Date Name / Agency
    ID # Comment Commenter Comment Final Proponent Response Date Name / Agency 1 2017-02-07 Antonia Mills - People in Digby Island region are greatly concerned about the environmental and human health impacts of the Aurora LNG project because Nexen is proposing to Aurora LNG employed a conservative approach throughout the environmental assessment to ensure the potential effects of the Project were not underestimated. Prince George dredge and alter a large portion of the Delusion Bay habitat for their loading trestle. This project could have impacts to Skeena Salmon similar to those posed by Pacific As outlined in the environmental assessment application, Delusion Bay is expected to remain largely undisturbed and dredge activities are limited to areas off of North West LNG at Flora Bank. Dr. Barb Faggetter assigned a habitat value to the Delusion Bay area equal to that of Flora Bank. Studies being carried out in the area Frederick Point and Casey Cove. The Fish Habitat Offset Plan (currently being developed) will include details on the potential effects to fish and fish habitat have shown significant numbers of juvenile salmon. The project is also very close to the community of Digby Island. A proper Environmental Review would note that the including salmon and the proposed offset to meet the DFO requirement of no net loss. salmon need protection. 2 2017-02-07 Christopher Travis The proposed LNG terminal will hamper the migration of salmon and steelhead up the Skeena River. Any encroachment on Digby Island will have a deleterious affect on Aurora LNG appreciates and acknowledges your concerns. Aurora LNG is undergoing a thorough, independent environmental assessment process, led by the - California spawning salmon and also growth of juvenile salmon and steelhead.
    [Show full text]