URBAN VISION & MASTERPLAN

ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS - –

Kartal-Pendik Masterplan; ISTANBUL ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS Kartal-Pendik Masterplan; ISTANBUL ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS Kartal-Pendik Masterplan; ISTANBUL ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS

Kartal-Pendik Masterplan; ISTANBUL ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS PLAZA [MEYDANLAR]

Kartal-Pendik Masterplan; ISTANBUL ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS

Kartal-Pendik Masterplan; ISTANBUL ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS Kartal-Pendik Masterplan; ISTANBUL ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS

Kartal-Pendik Masterplan; ISTANBUL ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS Kartal-Pendik Masterplan; ISTANBUL ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS Kartal-Pendik Masterplan; ISTANBUL ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS BUILDING FOOTPRINTS [BINA ALANLARI]

Kartal-Pendik Masterplan; ISTANBUL ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS PUBLIC BUILDINGS [KAMU BINALARI]

Kartal-Pendik Masterplan; ISTANBUL ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS PEDESTRIAN ROADS [YAYA YOLLARI]

Kartal-Pendik Masterplan; ISTANBUL ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS

Kartal-Pendik Masterplan; ISTANBUL ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS CMA CGM TOWER

Kartal-Pendik Masterplan; ISTANBUL ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS Kartal-Pendik Masterplan; ISTANBUL ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS Kartal-Pendik Masterplan; ISTANBUL ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS

Kartal-Pendik Masterplan; ISTANBUL ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS Kartal-Pendik Masterplan; ISTANBUL ZAHA HADID ARCHITECTS

LAND OWNERSHIP [MULKIYET]

zaha hadid architects new euskotren station and headquarters, durango

MASTERPLAN INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Infrastructure Engineering Topics for Discussion Today : Rob Riddall

• Transport updates • Marina • Ground Conditions • Sustainability • Utilities

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Transportation Engineering OVERVIEW TRANSPORT

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Transportation Engineering Residential

Office

Commercial 15.0% 5.7% Other

19.3%

40.0%

30.0% 59.0%

16.0%

15.0%

OPTION A & C OPTION B

PRIVATE LAND USE MIX OPTIONS

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Transportation Engineering TRANSPORT CRITICAL ISSUES AM PEAK PM PEAK

25,000 25,000

20,000 20,000

15,000 15,000 OUT OUT IN IN People People 10,000 10,000

5,000 5,000

0 0 Option A Option B Option C Option A Option B Option C

EXTERNAL TRAFFIC FLOWS

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Transportation Engineering TRANSPORT CRITICAL ISSUES E5 - East

1,300 AM PEAK 1,840 [1,315] [1,480]

2,750 Option A

[2,775] Option B

2,265 745 [1,860] [750]

5,605 2,750 [4,555] [2,775]

E5 - East PM PEAK 2,185 2,500 [1,495] [1,950]

2,750 Option A

[2,775] Option B • E5 reduced to two lanes in vicinity • Partial junctions affect capacity 2,805 1,645 • Circular ramps of capacity of approx [2,095] [1,525] 1500 vph 6,740 6,170 • Capacity further compromised by [4,840] [4,760] entering and exit conflicts

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Transportation Engineering E5 INTERCHANGE AM PEAK PM PEAK

45,000 45,000

40,000 40,000

35,000 35,000

30,000 30,000

25,000 25,000 OUT OUT IN IN

People 20,000 20,000 People

15,000 15,000

10,000 10,000

5,000 5,000

0 0 Option A Option B Option C Option A Option B Option C

EXTERNAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT MOVEMENTS (PASSENGERS)

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Transportation Engineering TRANSPORT CRITICAL ISSUES Metro station Recommended proposal Potential pedestrian destination Recommended proposal Potential pedestrian route Recommended proposal)

Metro station (existing proposal)

Potential pedestrian destination (existing proposal)

Potential pedestrian route (existing proposal)

N RELOCATION OF METRO STATION 500m

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Transportation Engineering CONNECTIVITY COMPARISON Metro –Existing location

Metro –Recommended Public transport interchange

Suburban rail – major bus station - Public transport interchange

Proposed bus routes

Alternative bus routes – Proposed based on existing location of metro

N

1Km

POTENTIAL BUS ROUTES

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Transportation Engineering PUBLIC TRANSPORT GENERALISED PARKING STANDARDS TO BE APPLIED

50000 45000 • Parking Control critical to controlling 40000 traffic flows

35000 • Option A land use not feasible eg office Weekday day car use 15% 30000 Weekday evening 25000 Weekend day • Option B more realistic

People 20000 Weekend evening • Car sharing important Total Non sharing 15000 10000 5000 0 Option A Option B Option C

• Parking Standards in some cases below prescribed ratios • Average of 1 space per residential unit • Average of 1 space per 45 sq m of retail • Average of 1 space per 100 sq m of office

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Transportation Engineering PARKING ISSUES SUMMARY

All European type major cities rely in their business and commercial centres on

• Public transport • Strong limitation on parking

To think that this project is different will lead to significant problems in the future.

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Transportation Engineering MARINA

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Maritime Engineering Marina Requirements

• Vessels 25m to 8m • Landside facilities 0.5ha spread out • Marina dredged to -6m deep • Car parking 1.8ha • Shallow water reduces cost • Dredging and excavation cut/fill • Composite breakwater in 15m water • Phasing options

Phase 1 – 162 berths (1.9ha)

Phase 1 – 300 dry stacked berths (1.8ha stacked 3 high)

Phase 2 – 538 berths (6.7ha) which could be sub-phased further

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Maritime Engineering 1000 Berth Marina Criteria • Design vessel: IDO seabus 43m long 450 passengers • Berth lengths 100m long (future expansion) • Separate marina traffic prohibits collision/delay • Ferry terminal building

Public Transport • 3no. 450 capacity ferries per berth per hour ~ 2,700 pph • 10% public transport • Terminal could increase capacity of required to 5,400 pph

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Maritime Engineering Ferry Terminal GROUND CONDITIONS

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Geotechnical Engineering Ground Conditions

Seismic Zone • Liquefaction potential/landslide hazard • Tsunami risk

Excavation • Sedimentary rock at or near surface • Tunnels cut and cover may be suitable

Contamination and Obstructions • Likelihood of significant buried obstructions • High potential for contamination

Building Foundations • Typically pad, strip, raft & piled options • Design to account for variability in soils

Further Work • Desk studies, site investigation and interpretation

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Geotechnical Engineering GEOTECHNICAL ISSUES SUSTAINABILITY

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Environmental Engineering SUSTAINABILITY Sustainability

Transport • Public transport prime means of getting to the site • Public transport and walking must be prime means of movement within the site • Parking control and management needed to ensure public transport use • Need for change in social attitudes

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Environmental Engineering SUSTAINABILITY High efficiency thermal system (*) renewable power does not affect Electrical power supply peak installed demand (**) Solar panel recommended in Hot water absence of CHP if no CHP Warm water return (***) Rain water harvested if no grey water system is on place) Potable water

Grey water SOLAR PANEL (**) Foul water PV MICRO 27MW (*) WIND Rain water (***)

Irrigation water

Heating Air conditioning (if absorption chillers provided)

3,000 m3/day 180MW 270MW HEAT PUMP + OPTIONAL ABSORPTION CHILLER 90MW CITY WIDE NETWORK CHP

Warm water return HEAT SINK 4,000 m3/day (SEVERAL Excess grey water to OPTIONS) foul in winter Hot water pipe OFF SITE WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT 18,000 m3/day CITY WIDE NETWORK 14,000 m3/day

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Environmental Engineering SUSTAINABILITY UTILITIES

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Civil Engineering Existing 35KV cable

Proposed 35KV ring

Proposed 10KV rings for local x distribution x x Connection points to exiting grid

x Substations (100mx20m)

x x

1Km N

ELECTRICITY NETWORK

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Civil Engineering PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION OF OPTION 1 Existing 35KV cable

Proposed 35KV ring x x Connection points to existing grid x Substations + CHP plant (120x30) x CHP plant (25mx50m)

Areas served by each CHP Approx. 650,000m2GFA each

10KV rings for local distribution not shown for simplicity x x

1Km N

ELECTRICITY NETWORK

Kartal Pendik, Strategic Civil Engineering PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION OF OPTION 2