DOCSLIB.ORG

A Technical Agreement Under the Bonn Convention

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Technical Agreement Under the Bonn Convention Boere& Lenten:The African-EurasianWaterbird Agreement: a technicalagreement under the BonnConvention The African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement: a technical agreementunder the Bonn Convention G.C. Boere & B. Lenten Boere,G.C. & Lenten,B. 1998.The African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement: a technicalagreement under the Bonn Conventionv International Wader Studies 10: 45-50. The historyof the developmentof theAfrican-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement of the Bonn Convention(Convention on the conservationof migratoryspecies) is outlined.The Dutch Governmentcommenced drafting the Agreement in 1988and the textwas concluded at a final negotiationmeeting at TheHague in June1996. The Agreement is now openfor signatureand it is expectedthat the firstConference of the ContractingParties will occurin 1999in SouthAfrica. The paperoutlines the principleobligations assumed by signatoriesto theAgreement and the legal implicationsof these.Various related activities are already underwa)5 such as the developmentof a numberof singlespecies international action or recoveryplans. G.C.Boere & B. Lenten,AEWA Interim Secretariat, c/o Departmentof Nature Management, P.O. Box 20401,2500 EK TheHague, The Netherlands. dependenton the specificsites they find, not only at Introduction and Perspective the end of theirjourney, but alsoalong the way. Throughouthistory, animal migration has been a Increasingly,these sites are threatenedby man-made universalphenomenon. Many animalsmigrate in disturbancesand habitatdegradation. Migratory responseto biologicalrequirements, such as the animalsmay alsofall victim to adversenatural needto find suitablelocations for breedingand phenomenasuch as unfavourable climatic raisingtheir young,and to be in favourableareas conditions.All theseinfluences are aggravatedby for feeding. In somecases, these specific the factthat, in legalterms, it haslong been held that requirementsare fulfilledin locationsthat are migratoryspecies are not the soleresponsibility of separatedby distancesof thousandof kilometres. any onecountry that couldbe held responsiblefor any harm occurringto theseanimals. During their migrationthese animals cross political boundaries between nations: boundaries that have In 1972 the United Nations Conference on the no inherentmeaning for animals,but which have a Human Environmentrecognized the need for dramaticinfluence on their annuallife-cycles and countriesto co-operatein the conservationof their individual survivalchances due to the great animalsthat migrateacross national boundaries or differences that exist between countries in betweenareas of nationaljurisdiction and the high conservationpolicy. Migratory speciesare seas. This recommendation resulted in the 45 International Wader Studies 10: 45-50 Conventionon the Conservationof Migratory Table1. Shorthistorical overview of treatiesinvolving Speciesof Wild Animals,commonly referred to as migratorybirds in Africa-Eurasia. the BonnConvention (after the Germancity where it was concluded in 1979), which came into force in 1902 - Convention for the Protectionof Birds 1983. usefulto agriculture(referred to as theParis Convention- this Convention did not mention The aim of the Conventionis to provide migratorybirds specifically). conservationmeasures for migratoryterrestrial, 19150- Convention for the Pro•ection of Birds, marineand avianspecies over the wholeof their substitutingthe 1902Convention of Paris; range. Thisis very important,because failure to 1970 - BeneluxConvention on Huntingand conservethese species at any particularstage of Protection of Birds; their life cyclecould adversely affect any 1979 - The Directive of the Council of the conservation efforts elsewhere. The fundamental EuropeanEconomic Community on the principlesof the BonnConvention, therefore, are: Conservation of WiId Birds• 1979 - Convention onthe ConservatiOnOf that the Parties of the Bonn Convention MigratorySpecies of Wild Animals(Bonn acknowledgethe importanceof migratory Convention) speciesbeing conserved; ............. that RangeStates of particularspecies After the first Conference of Parties of the Bonn agreeto takeaction to thisend whenever Conventionit was decidedto preparean Agreement possibleand appropriate,paying special for the Western Palearctic Anatidae. In 1988 the attentionto migratoryspecies of which DutchGovernment began developing a draft the conservation status is unfavourable; WesternPalearctic Waterfowl Agreement as part of and its WesternPalearctic Flyway conservation programme.In 1991a draft, includingan Action that RangeStates take individually,or in Plan for ducks,swans and geeseand a general co-operation,appropriate and necessary ManagementPlan for all waterfowl,was sentto the stepsto conservesuch species and their EuropeanCommission which offeredto sponsorthe habitat. Agreement.However little progresscould be made within the EuropeanCommission. Partiesacknowledge the needto take actionto avoid any migratoryspecies becoming endangered. In In early 1993the BonnConvention secretariat, in particular,the Partiesto the Convention: closeco-operation with the DutchGovernment, againtook the initiative. The textof theAgreement shallendeavour to provideimmediate and relateddocuments was updated,a stronger protectionfor migratoryspecies included Africancomponent was incorparatedand the name in AppendixI; was changedinto the African-EurasianWaterbird Agreement(AEWA). shallendeavour to concludeAgreements coveringthe conservationand The first consultativemeeting of RangeStates of the managementof migratoryspecies AEWA was held in Nairobi in June 1994. The includedin AppendixII. meetingstrongly supported the completionof AEWA, and agreedthat consensuscould be The primarytools for the implementationof the achieved on almost all matters of substance. In June main aim of the Bonn Convention are called 1995the final negotiationmeeting was held in The Agreements.They aremore specific than the Hague. At this meeting64 RangeStates and the Conventionitself, involve more deliberatelythe EuropeanUnion were represented.Several inter- RangeStates of the speciesto be conservedand are governmentaland non-governmentalorganizations easierto put into practicethan the wholeBonn attendedthe negotiationmeeting as observers.The Convention. meetingadopted the Agreement by consensus,and accepted,with appreciation,the offerof the A brief historical review Governmentof the Kingdomof the Netherlandsto actas Depositary and to provide,at its own expense TheAfrican-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement under until 1 January1999, an Interim Secretariatand to the BonnConvention is not the first nor the only hostthe first sessionof the Meetingof the Parties. internationalagreement aimed at the conservation of migratorybirds. A reviewof historicaland The Dutch Government,Ministry of Agriculture, existinginstruments has been published by Lyster Nature Managementand Fisheriesestablished the (1985). Interim Secretariaton 1 January1996. Besides the above mentioned Conventions, a The procedurefor signingand ratifyingthe numberof bilateralconventions for example Agreementhas been delayed because of problems betweenJapan and U.S.A.,the formerUSSR, Japan with the Russian and Arabic translation of the and Australia, etc. were concluded. Agreementtext. In March 1996these problems 46 Boere& Lenten: The African-EurasianWaterbird Agreement: a technicalagreement under the BonnConvention Algeria Greece Romania Andorra Guinea Russian Federation Angola Guinea -Bissau Rwanda Armenia Hungary Sao Tome and Principe.. •Austria Iceland SaniMago Azerbaijan Iran Saudi Arabia Bahrain Iraq Senegal Belarus Ireland Seychelles Belgium Israel Sierra Leone 'Benin Italy Slovakia '•Bosnia'Herzegovina Jordan Slovenia Botswana Kazakhstan Somalia Bulgaria Kenya South Africa Burkina Faso Kuwait Spain Burundi, Latvia :Sudan 'Cameroon •banon Swaziland Canada Lesotho Sweden Cape Verde Liberia Switzerland CentralAfrican Republic LibyanArab.Jamahiriya Syrian Arab Republic .Chad Liechtenstein :Theformer Yugoslav Republic ComO'it0s Littm•a. of:Maced0•a Congo Luxembourg Tanzania C6te d•Ivore Madagascar Tunisia 'Croatia Malawi Turkey :'Cyprus Mali:: Turkmenistan :i-C.zech.Republic Malta Uganda Denmark Mauritani a •ine Djibouti Mauritius United Arab Emirates Egypt Monaco United Kingdom of Great EquatorialGUinea Morocco Britain and Northern Ireland Mozambique Uzbekistan Eritrea Namibia Yemen Estoni• Netherlands Yugoslavi• Ethiopia Niger Zaire Finland Nigeria Zambia France Norway z'rmbabwe Gabon. Oman EuropeanCommission 'Gambia poland Georgia PortUgal Germany Qatar .Ghana Republic of:Moldavia Table 2. List of RangeStates. were solved,including some minor linguistic ß Firstlythe Agreementtext, which problemswith the Englishand Frenchversions. describesthe philosophy,legal frameworkand provisions; TheAgreement has been open for signatureat the Ministry of ForeignAffairs of the Netherlandsfrom Secondlyan Action Plan, which describes 15 August 1996. the conservation actions that are to be taken.The Action Plan is at present The Netherlands, Guinea, Switzerland, Sudan, restrictedto geese,swans, ducks, Jordanand EquatorialGuinea have signedwithout spoonbills,ibises and storks. the needfor furtherratification. German• Ireland, UnitedKingdom, Mali, Luxembourg, Morocco, TheAfrican-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement is the Togo,Spain, Greece, and the EuropeanCommunity firstregional Agreement of a vastarea of 60 million haveall signedwith reservationswith respectto squarekilometres. It coversthe entirecontinent of ratification.a further30 or socountries are currently Africa and Europe,as
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • From Some Bird Species in Turkey Türkiye’Deki Bazı Kuş Türlerinden Yeni Çiğneyici Bit (Phthiraptera) Türü Kayıtları
    168 Original Investigation / Özgün Araştırma New records of Chewing Lice (Phthiraptera) From Some Bird Species in Turkey Türkiye’deki Bazı Kuş Türlerinden Yeni Çiğneyici Bit (Phthiraptera) Türü Kayıtları Bilal DİK Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey ABSTRACT Objective: This study was carried out to detect chewing-lice found on some birds in Turkey. Methods: For this aim, a Eurasian collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto), a budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) and a marbled duck (Mar- maronetta angustirostris) were examined for the louse. Results: Columbicola bacillus (Giebel, 1866) was found on a Eurasian collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto), Afrimenopon waar (Eichler, 1947) on a budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) and Anatoecus icterodes (Nitzsch, 1818) on a marbled duck (Marmaronetta angustirostris). Conclusion: All three louse species were recorded for the fi rst time in Turkey. Anatoecus icterodes was reported for the fi rst time from marbled duck in the worldwide. Therefore, marbled duck is a new host for Anatoecus icterodes. (Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2010; 34: 168-73) Key Words: Phthiraptera, Columbicola columbae, Afrimenopon waar, Anatoecus icterodes, Turkey Received: 26.05.2010 Accepted: 17.08.2010 ÖZET Amaç: Bu araştırma bazı kuşlarda bulunan bit türlerini belirlemek için yapılmıştır. Yöntemler: Bu amaçla bir adet Kumru (Streptopelia decaocto), bir adet Muhabbet Kuşu (Melopsittacus undulatus) ve bir adet Yaz Ördeği (Marmaronetta angustirostris) bit yönünden incelenmiştir. Bulgular: Kumru (Streptopelia decaocto)’da Columbicola bacillus (Giebel, 1866), Muhabbet Kuşu (Melopsittacus undulatus)’nda Afrimeno- pon waar (Eichler, 1947) Yaz Ördeği (Marmaronetta angustirostris)’nde ise Anatoecus icterodes (Nitzsch, 1818)’e rastlanmıştır. Sonuç: Bu türlerin üçü de Türkiye’den ilk kez bildirilmiş, Anatoecus icterodes ise yaz ördeğinden dünyada ilk kez rapor edilmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • Buceros Vol-9 No-3 Year-2004
    Buceros Vol. 9, No. 3 (2004) A bibliography of the Anatidae of south Asia Aasheesh Pittie 8-2-545 Road No. 7, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, India. Email: [email protected] INTRODUCTION This bibliography has been extracted from my larger a distribution pattern of the Anatidae.Accuracy in bibliographic database (Pittie 2005) and covers the transcribing is a basic tenet of bibliography and though political boundaries of the following south Asian great care has been taken to ensure it, mistakes may countries: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, the have crept in and pertinent papers, notes, reports, books, Maldives, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri etc., may have been inadvertently left out.This is the Lanka. Tibet is also covered. It comprises papers, popular more likely in that I have not seen all the entries listed articles, books, published and un-published reports, and below in the original, but have freely taken them second chapters, in which members of the avian family, Anatidae hand from the ‘References’ or ‘Further Reading’ sections (ducks, geese, swans), find mention. It covers a period of papers and books. of over two and a half centuries, from 1750 up to 2004. Authors have been arranged alphabetically and their Of the 49 genera and 158 species that comprise the work chronologically. Multi-author papers have been family Anatidae worldwide (Dickinson 2003), 19 genera listed under the name of the senior author(i.e., the first and 46 species are found in south Asia. Of these, the author, not the oldest). Separate entries have not been Pink-headed Duck Rhodonessa caryophyllacea is made for co-authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Lead Exposure on Oxidative Stress Biomarkers and Plasma $ Biochemistry in Waterbirds in the field
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital.CSIC Effects of lead exposure on oxidative stress biomarkers and plasma $ biochemistry in waterbirds in the field a,b,n b a Monica Martinez-Haro , Andy J. Green , Rafael Mateo a Instituto de Investigacio´n en Recursos Cinege´ticos – IREC (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), Ronda de Toledo s/n, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain b Department of Wetland Ecology, Estacio´n Biolo´gica de Do˜nana – EBD (CSIC), Ame´rico Vespucio s/n, 41092 Sevilla, Spain a b s t r a c t Medina lagoon in Andalusia has one of the highest densities of spent lead (Pb) shot in Europe. Blood samples from waterbirds were collected in 2006–2008 to measure Pb concentration (PbB), d- Keywords: aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (ALAD), oxidative stress biomarkers and plasma biochemistry. PbB Antioxidants above background levels ( 4 20 g/dl) was observed in 19% (n ¼ 59) of mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) Background level m Heavy metals and in all common pochards (Aythya ferina) (n ¼ 4), but common coots (Fulica atra) (n ¼ 37) and Lead poisoning moorhens (Gallinula chloropus) (n ¼ 12) were all o 20 mg/dl. ALAD ratio in mallards and coots decreased Shot ingestion with PbB levels 4 6 mg/dl. In mallards, an inhibition of glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and an increased Wildlife level of oxidized glutathione (oxGSH) in red blood cells (RBC) were associated with PbB levels 4 20 mg/ dl. In coots, PbB levels were negatively related to vitamin A and carotenoid levels in plasma, and total glutathione in RBCs; and positively related with higher superoxide dismutase and GPx activities and % oxGSH in RBCs.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Species in Lebanon & Jordan
    This field guide aims at giving comprehensive information about the key species endan- gered, vulnerable or critically endangered in Lebanese and Jordanian protected areas of the MEET project. The Mediterranean Experience of Ecotourism (MEET) project develops an ecotourism model for Mediterranean Protected Areas based on the “European Charter for Sustainable Tour- ism” to promote a better seasonal distribution of tourism flows. The MEET catalogue fosters authentic and ac- tive exchange between visitors, local people, and Protected Areas, resulting in conservation of natural and cultural resources and revital- A Field ization of less developed communities. Guide Key Species in INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE Lebanon & Jordan Regional Office for West Asia Key Species from the IUCN REDLIST Hasan Baker Al Azazi St. #20 Sweifiyeh - Amman - Jordan T. +962 6 554 6912 /3/4 F. +962 6 554 6915 [email protected] www.iucn.org/westasia A Field Guide Key Species in Lebanon & Jordan Key Species from the IUCN REDLIST A Field Guide Key Species in Lebanon and Jordan Credits Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ......................................................................................................................................................5 MEET Project ...............................................................................................................................................................................6 LEBANON PAs KEY SPECIES RED LIST .............................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds of Okhla Barrage Bird Sanctuary, Delhi, India
    FORKTAIL 19 (2003): 39-50 The birds of Okhla barrage bird sanctuary, Delhi, India ABDUL JAMIL URFI Okhla barrage bird sanctuary, on the river Yamuna in south Delhi, is an important site for breeding and wintering waterbirds, with 14,000–20,000 waterbirds recorded in winter. The dominant feature of the site is a large lake formed after the creation of a barrage on the river in 1986. Historical records, records resulting from fieldwork since 1989, and other recent records have been combined to produce a list of 302 species for the site and its immediate area. Species recorded since 1992 include three Vulnerable species (Baer’s Pochard Aythya baeri, Indian Skimmer Rynchops albicollis and Bristled Grassbird Chaetornis striatus) and six Near Threatened species (Ferruginous Pochard Aythya nyroca, Black-bellied Tern Sterna acuticauda, Darter Anhinga melanogaster, Black-headed Ibis Threskiornis melanocephalus, Painted Stork Mycteria leucocephala and Black-necked Stork Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus). The sanctuary is being encroached upon, and isolated by, surrounding development. INTRODUCTION The Okhla barrage bird sanctuary in Delhi is a haven for waterbirds (Singh 1983, Urfi 1993a, b, 1995). In 1990, an area of c.3.5 km2 on the river Yamuna in Delhi was notified as a bird sanctuary by the Uttar Pradesh government under the Wildlife Protection Act of India. The site is located at the point where the river leaves the territory of Delhi and enters the neighbouring state of Uttar Pradesh (Fig. 1). The most prominent feature of the sanctuary is the large lake created by damming the river, which lies sandwiched between Okhla village towards the west and Gautambudh Nagar towards the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Simplified-ORL-2019-5.1-Final.Pdf
    The Ornithological Society of the Middle East, the Caucasus and Central Asia (OSME) The OSME Region List of Bird Taxa, Part F: Simplified OSME Region List (SORL) version 5.1 August 2019. (Aligns with ORL 5.1 July 2019) The simplified OSME list of preferred English & scientific names of all taxa recorded in the OSME region derives from the formal OSME Region List (ORL); see www.osme.org. It is not a taxonomic authority, but is intended to be a useful quick reference. It may be helpful in preparing informal checklists or writing articles on birds of the region. The taxonomic sequence & the scientific names in the SORL largely follow the International Ornithological Congress (IOC) List at www.worldbirdnames.org. We have departed from this source when new research has revealed new understanding or when we have decided that other English names are more appropriate for the OSME Region. The English names in the SORL include many informal names as denoted thus '…' in the ORL. The SORL uses subspecific names where useful; eg where diagnosable populations appear to be approaching species status or are species whose subspecies might be elevated to full species (indicated by round brackets in scientific names); for now, we remain neutral on the precise status - species or subspecies - of such taxa. Future research may amend or contradict our presentation of the SORL; such changes will be incorporated in succeeding SORL versions. This checklist was devised and prepared by AbdulRahman al Sirhan, Steve Preddy and Mike Blair on behalf of OSME Council. Please address any queries to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic List of the Romanian Vertebrate Fauna
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © Décembre Vol. LIII pp. 377–411 «Grigore Antipa» 2010 DOI: 10.2478/v10191-010-0028-1 SYSTEMATIC LIST OF THE ROMANIAN VERTEBRATE FAUNA DUMITRU MURARIU Abstract. Compiling different bibliographical sources, a total of 732 taxa of specific and subspecific order remained. It is about the six large vertebrate classes of Romanian fauna. The first class (Cyclostomata) is represented by only four species, and Pisces (here considered super-class) – by 184 taxa. The rest of 544 taxa belong to Tetrapoda super-class which includes the other four vertebrate classes: Amphibia (20 taxa); Reptilia (31); Aves (382) and Mammalia (110 taxa). Résumé. Cette contribution à la systématique des vertébrés de Roumanie s’adresse à tous ceux qui sont intéressés par la zoologie en général et par la classification de ce groupe en spécial. Elle représente le début d’une thème de confrontation des opinions des spécialistes du domaine, ayant pour but final d’offrir aux élèves, aux étudiants, aux professeurs de biologie ainsi qu’à tous ceux intéressés, une synthèse actualisée de la classification des vertébrés de Roumanie. En compilant différentes sources bibliographiques, on a retenu un total de plus de 732 taxons d’ordre spécifique et sous-spécifique. Il s’agît des six grandes classes de vertébrés. La première classe (Cyclostomata) est représentée dans la faune de Roumanie par quatre espèces, tandis que Pisces (considérée ici au niveau de surclasse) l’est par 184 taxons. Le reste de 544 taxons font partie d’une autre surclasse (Tetrapoda) qui réunit les autres quatre classes de vertébrés: Amphibia (20 taxons); Reptilia (31); Aves (382) et Mammalia (110 taxons).
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Isbn 99940-58-55-X
    AN ECOREGIONAL CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE CAUCASUSAN ECOREGIONAL CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE CAUCASUS Second Edition May 2006 ISBN 99940-58-55-X Design and printing Contour Ltd 8, Kargareteli street, Tbilisi 0164, Georgia May, 2006 Coordinated by: In collaboration with: With the technical support of: Assisted by experts and contributors: ARMENIA MAMMEDOVA, S. NAKHUTSRISHVILI, G. POPOVICHEV, V. AGAMYAN, L. MUKHTAROV, I. NINUA, N. PTICHNIKOV, A. AGASYAN, A. NAJAFOV, A. SERGEEVA, J. BELANOVSKAYA, E. AKOPYAN, S. ORUJEV, Ad. SIKHARULIDZE, Z. SALPAGAROV, A. AMBARTSUMYAN, A. ORUJEV, Al. SOPADZE, G. SHESTAKOV, A ARZUMANYAN, G. RAKHMATULINA, I. TARKHNISHVILI, D. SKOROBOGACH, J. BALYAN, L. RZAEV, R. TOLORDAVA, K. SPIRIDONOV, V. DANYELYAN, T. SATTARZADE, R. TAMOV, M. DAVTYAN, R. SAFAROV, S. IRAN TUNIEV, B. GABRIELYAN, E. SHAMCHIYEV, T. AGHILI, A. VAISMAN, A. GLYCHIAN, D. SULEIMANOV, M. EVERETT, J. (Coordinator) BELIK, V. GRIGORYAN, E. SULTANOV, E. FARVAR, M.T. JENDEREDJIAN, K. TAGIEVA, E. JAZEBIZADEH, K. KAZARYAN, H. KAVOUSI, K. TURKEY KAZARYAN, M. GEORGIA MAHFOUZI, M. ALTINTAS, M. KHASABYAN, M. ARABULI, A. MANSURI, J. ATAY, S KHOROZYAN, I. ARABULI, G. NAGHIZADEH, N BIRSEL, A. MANVELYAN, K. (Coordinator) BERUCHASHVILI, G. NAJAFI, A. CAN, E. MARKARYAN, N. BERUCHASHVILI, N. ZIYAEE, H. CIFTCI, N. MURADYAN, S. BUKHNIKASHVILI, A. RAHMANIYAN, M. DOMAC, A. RUKHKYAN, L. BUTKHUZI, L. GURKAN, B. SHASHIKYAN, S. CHEKURISHVILI, Z. IPEK, A. TOVMASYAN, S. DIDEBULIDZE, A. RUSSIA KALEM, S. VANYAN, A. DZNELADZE, M. BIRYUKOV, N. KUCUK, M. VARDANYAN, J. EGIASHVILI, D. BLAGOVIDOV, A. KURDOGLU, O. VOSKANOV, M. GELASHVILI, A. BRATKOV, V. KURT, B. ZIROYAN, A. GOGICHAISHVILI, L. BUKREEV, S. LISE, Y. (Coordinator) ZORANYAN, V. GOKHELASHVILI, R. CHILIKIN, V. URAS, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Arabian Peninsula
    THE CONSERVATION STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE BREEDING BIRDS OF THE ARABIAN PENINSULA Compiled by Andy Symes, Joe Taylor, David Mallon, Richard Porter, Chenay Simms and Kevin Budd ARABIAN PENINSULA The IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM - Regional Assessment About IUCN IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, helps the world find pragmatic solutions to our most pressing environment and development challenges. IUCN’s work focuses on valuing and conserving nature, ensuring effective and equitable governance of its use, and deploying nature-based solutions to global challenges in climate, food and development. IUCN supports scientific research, manages field projects all over the world, and brings governments, NGOs, the UN and companies together to develop policy, laws and best practice. IUCN is the world’s oldest and largest global environmental organization, with almost 1,300 government and NGO Members and more than 15,000 volunteer experts in 185 countries. IUCN’s work is supported by almost 1,000 staff in 45 offices and hundreds of partners in public, NGO and private sectors around the world. www.iucn.org About the Species Survival Commission The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is the largest of IUCN’s six volunteer commissions with a global membership of around 7,500 experts. SSC advises IUCN and its members on the wide range of technical and scientific aspects of species conservation, and is dedicated to securing a future for biodiversity. SSC has significant input into the international agreements dealing with biodiversity conservation. About BirdLife International BirdLife International is the world’s largest nature conservation Partnership. BirdLife is widely recognised as the world leader in bird conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Waterbird Re-Establishment in the Aewa Area
    Doc: LWfG Recap 2.5 Doc: AEWA/MOP 4.11 AGREEMENT ON THE CONSERVATION OF Agenda item: 11.d. AFRICAN-EURASIAN MIGRATORY WATERBIRDS Original: English Date: 15 August 2008 4th SESSION OF THE MEETING OF THE PARTIES 15 – 19 September 2008, Antananarivo, Madagascar “Flyway Conservation at Work – Review of the Past, Vision for the Future" REVIEW OF WATERBIRD RE-ESTABLISHMENT IN THE AEWA AREA Introduction According to Paragraph 7.4 of the AEWA Action Plan the Agreement Secretariat, in coordination with the Technical Committee and the Parties, shall prepare a series of international reviews necessary for the implementation of the Action Plan, including, inter alia, a Review of waterbird re-establishment in the Agreement area. After a call for tenders the compilation of this review was commissioned to the Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust. Information from Range States on the implementation of re-establishments was collected through questionnaires. This review was approved by the Technical Committee at its 8th meeting in March 2008 and endorsed by the Standing Committee at its 5th meeting June 2008 for submission to MOP4. Conclusions and recommendation from the review served as a basis for draft Resolution 4.4. Action requested from the Meeting of the Parties The Meeting of the Parties is invited to note the Review of waterbird re-establishments in the AEWA area and take its conclusions and recommendations into account in the decision making process. Doc: LWfG Recap 2.5 AEWA Re-establishment Review Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Review of Waterbird Re-establishment in the AEWA Region Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Slimbridge Gloucestershire, UK GL2 7BT Final draft – April 2008 Doc: LWfG Recap 2.5 Authors: Rebecca Lee & Baz Hughes Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust, Slimbridge, Gloucestershire, GL2 7BT United Kingdom Email: [email protected] or [email protected] Acknowledgements The production of this review would not have been possible without the contributions of a number of ornithological experts and representatives from national governmental agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregion Conservation Plan
    List of Contributors ARMENIA Seyed-Mohammadreza Fatemi, Islamic Azad University Aram Agasyan, Ministry of Nature Protection Mohammad Baqherzadeh-Karimi, Iranian Department Arthur Alaverdyan, State Forest Monitoring Centre of Environment Luba Balyan, Armenian Society of Protection of Birds NGO Mina Torki, Expert Tatyana Danielyan, Ministry of Nature Protection Asghar Mohammadi Fazel, Iranian Department Siranush Galstyan, WWF Armenia Branch of Environment Mamikon Ghasabyan, Institute of Zoology, Behzad Saeedpour, University of Environment National Academy of Sciences Hossein Mohammadi, Iranian Department of Environment Eleonora Grigoryan, Ministry of Nature Protection Mohammad S. Farhadinia, Iranian Cheetah Society Diana Harutyunyan, UNDP Armenia Ali Bali, Iranian Department of Environment Karen Jenderedjian, UNDP Armenia Mohammad Nosrati, Iranian Department of Environment Mark Kalashian, Institute of Zoology, Bagher Nezami, University of Environment /Iranian National Academy of Sciences Cheetah Society Nazik Khanjyan, Institute of Botany, Hadi Jafari, University of Environment National Academy of Sciences Mohammadreza Masoud, East Azerbaijan Society Igor Khorozyan, WWF Armenia Branch for Protection of Wildlife Karen Manvelyan, WWF Armenia Branch Alexander Malkhasyan, WWF Armenia Branch RUSSIA Siranush Muradyan, Ministry of Nature Protection Sergey Bukreev, A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology Aram Ter-Zakaryan, UNDP Armenia and Evolution Mikhail Voskanov, Ministry of Nature Protection Gadzhibek Dzhamirzoev, Federal State Institution «Daghestansky
    [Show full text]