DOCSLIB.ORG

Cambodia Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance Assessment Final Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cambodia Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance Assessment Final Assessment Report CAMBODIA DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND GOVERNANCE ASSESSMENT FINAL ASSESSMENT REPORT April 2019 This publication was prepared by NORC and Social Impact Inc. and authored by Suzanne Kelly-Lyall, Neil Loughlin, and Kimchoeun Pak. It was produced at the request of the United States Agency for International Development. CAMBODIA DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND GOVERNANCE ASSESSMENT FINAL ASSESSMENT REPORT April 2019 DRG Learning, Evaluation, and Research (LER) II Activity Tasking N002 GS-10F-0033M / 7200AA18M00016 Cover Photo Credit: Nicole Goodrich DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i FINDINGS ii ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS vi INTRODUCTION 1 ASSESSMENT PURPOSE 1 METHODOLOGY: THE STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK 1 ASSESSMENT CONTEXT 3 STEP 1: DEFINING THE DRG CHALLENGE: FIVE DRG ELEMENTS 18 CONSENSUS 19 INCLUSION 21 COMPETITION AND POLITICAL ACCOUNTABILITY 25 HUMAN RIGHTS AND RULE OF LAW 29 GOVERNMENT RESPONSIVENESS AND EFFECTIVENESS 34 SUMMARY 36 STEP 2: ANALYZING KEY ACTORS AND INSTITUTIONS 37 THE SPOILERS 38 INDEPENDENT POLITICAL ACTORS 42 STEP 3: USAID’S OPERATIONAL/ PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENT 46 U.S. FOREIGN POLICY TOWARD CAMBODIA 46 USAID PRIORITIES, INTERESTS, AND RESOURCES 47 STEP 4: OUTLINING THE PROPOSED STRATEGY 52 SUMMARIZING STEPS 1 TO 3: THE PROBLEM STATEMENT 52 DRG OBJECTIVE 52 ANNEXES 61 ANNEX A: DONOR MATRIX 61 ANNEX B: KEY INFORMANT INTERVIEW AND FOCUS GROUP LIST 65 ANNEX C: RESEARCH INSTRUMENT 77 ANNEX D: LITERATURE REVIEW 83 ANNEX E: BIBLIOGRAPHY 109 TABLES Table 1: Cambodia's Top Export and Import Partners, 2017 ............................................................................... 41 FIGURES Figure 1: World Economic Forum Gender Gap, 2018 ............................................................................................. 9 Figure 2: Population with Internet Access in Cambodia (2010 - 2018) ............................................................. 10 Figure 3: Migration Patterns in Cambodia (2013 vs. 2018) ................................................................................... 11 Figure 4: ADB and World Bank Estimates of 2018 GDP Growth....................................................................... 13 Figure 5: UNDP Human Development Index, 2017................................................................................................ 14 Figure 6: Polity Data Series, Mekong Countries, 2018 ........................................................................................... 15 Figure 7: Bertelsmann Stiftung's Transformation Index, Governance, 2018 ..................................................... 15 Figure 8: Transparency International CPI, 2018 ....................................................................................................... 16 Figure 9: World Press Freedom Index, 2018 ............................................................................................................ 17 Figure 10: Freedom House, Freedom in the World, 2018 .................................................................................... 17 Figure 11: Self-Reliance Metrics: Inclusive Development ....................................................................................... 23 Figure 12: Self-Reliance Metrics: Open and Accountable Government ............................................................. 26 Figure 13: V-dem Civil Society Capacity 2018 .......................................................................................................... 29 Figure 14: V-Democracy Cambodia Indicators (2013 - 2018) .............................................................................. 30 Figure 15: Significant Political Events in Cambodia since 2015 ............................................................................. 32 Figure 16: Violations of Fundamental Freedoms, April 2017 – March 2018 ..................................................... 33 ACRONYMS Acronym Name ADB Asian Development Bank ADHOC Cambodia Human Rights and Development Association ADS Automated Directives System AIIB Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank API Advocacy and Policy Institute ASEAN Association of Southeast Asian Nations AT Assessment Team BLDP Buddhist Liberal Democratic Party BTI Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index CAO Compliance Advisor Ombudsman CBO Community-Based Organization CCHR Cambodian Center for Human Rights CDCS Country Development Cooperation Strategy CDRI Cambodian Development Resource Institute CICP Cambodian Institute for Cooperation and Peace CLC Cambodia Labor Confederation CNRP Cambodia National Rescue Party COMFREL Commitment for Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia CPP Cambodia People’s Party CSO Civil Society Organization C-TIP Counter Trafficking in Persons DO Development Objective DOS United States Department of State DRG Democracy, Rights, and Governance EBA Everything but Arms EC Equitable Cambodia ERI Earth Rights International EU European Union FDI Foreign Direct Investment FGD Focus Group Discussion FTUWKC Free Trade Union of Workers of Kingdom of Cambodia FUNCINPEC National United Front for an Independent, Neutral, Peaceful, and Cooperative Cambodia GADC Gender and Development for Cambodia GDP Grassroots Democracy Party GDP Gross Domestic Product HRP Human Rights Party HRW Human Rights Watch ICJ International Committee of Jurists ICNL Civic Freedom Monitor IFES International Federation for Electoral Systems IFI Independent Financial Institutions ILO International Labor Organization INGO International Non-Governmental Organization IP Implementing Partner IRI International Republican Institute I-SAF Implementation Plan – Social Accountability Framework KI Key Informant KII Key Informant Interview KYA Khmer Youth Association LANGO Law on Associations and Non-governmental Organizations LDP League for Democracy Party LER Learning, Evaluation, and Research LFPR Labor Force Participation Rate LGBT Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender LICADHO Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights MDB Multilateral Development Bank MFI Micro-finance Institution MIRO Minority Rights Organization MOC Ministry of Commerce MOE Ministry of Environment MOFA Ministry of Foreign Affairs MOI Ministry of the Interior MOL Ministry of Labor MP Member of Parliament NDI National Democratic Institute NEC National Election Committee NGO Non-Governmental Organization NORC National Opinion Research Center NRM Natural Resource Management ODA Official Development Assistance ODC Open Development Cambodia OHCHR Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights PAD Project Appraisal Document PE Political Economy PEA Political Economy Analysis PM Prime Minister PR Public Relations RFA Radio Free Asia RGC Royal Government of Cambodia ROI Return on Investment ROL Rule of Law SADP Southeast Asia Development Program SAF Strategic Assessment Framework SI Social Impact TI Transparency International TUL Trade Union Law UK United Kingdom UPR Universal Periodic Review U.S. United States USAID United States Agency for International Development USD United States Dollar USDAO U.S. Defense Attaché Office Cambodia USG United States Government UYFC Union Youth Federations of Cambodia VOA Voice of America WFP World Food Program EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This assessment reflects on recent changes in the democracy, human rights, and governance (DRG) operating environment in Cambodia. Following the four-step process outlined in USAID’s Strategic Assessment Framework (SAF), this assessment defines the core democracy, human rights, and governance problem(s) in Cambodia, identifies the interests and resources of key actors and institutions that could promote or inhibit progress toward democratization, and considers the United States Government’s (USG) current operational and programmatic environment in Cambodia. Second, it provides clear and actionable strategic and programmatic recommendations to address the identified core governance problem. The assessment focuses on the last five years (2013-2018) and identifies areas of continuity and change. The Assessment Team (AT) concludes that unlike historical periods of constriction and détente enacted by the government of Prime Minister Hun Sen, this period (2013-2018) is different. It is marked by the growing economic and political influence of China, as a powerful, coercive regional power. For this reason, a core issue explored in this assessment is that of China’s mounting political and economic influence on Cambodia and the ways in which this influence actively discourages a rules and rights-based approach to governance. We argue that the ‘rules of the game’ have changed, creating a political landscape now best characterized as a two-level game where all domestic policy consideration of the Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC) now have a secondary foreign policy consideration.1 In light of the democratic backsliding and U.S. government policy decisions, programmatic options are limited; however, strategic program recommendations offered in this assessment account for this change by encouraging investment in key actors (i.e., women , youth, and workers) with the aim of building effective coalitions that can advocate for ‘win-sets’ that counter the ‘Chinese development’ model and encourage political competition and great accountability by the Cambodian People’s Party (CPP). The last USAID Cambodia DRG assessment was conducted in 2014.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • English Only
    United Nations A/HRC/39/73/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 7 September 2018 English only Human Rights Council Thirty-ninth session 10–28 September 2018 Agenda item 10 Technical assistance and capacity-building Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia* This addendum to the annual report (A/HRC/39/73) focuses on human rights issues leading up to and around the 2018 National Assembly elections. During the interactive dialogue at the Human Rights Council’s thirty-sixth session, many States requested the Special Rapporteur pay particular attention to the human rights impact of the political situation ahead of the national elections. As the annual report to the Council was submitted before the election held on 29 July 2018, this addendum seeks to analyse the human rights situation in Cambodia during the electoral period, as well as the impact of the elections thereon. This addendum includes information up to 15 August 2018, when the final results were announced. Many of the concerns related to legislation and individual cases have previously been raised with the Royal Government of Cambodia in communications. A draft of this addendum was shared with the Government on 20 August. This addendum includes information on specific cases and alleged violations of human rights received by the Special Rapporteur. Some names and other personal identifying details have been withheld where divulging them may place the source at risk: details have only been included with the explicit informed oral consent of the source. Only information considered reliable and credible has been included.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambodia's Economic Relations with Thailand And
    CICP Working Paper No.25. i No. 25 Cambodia’s Economic Relations with Thailand and Vietnam Chheang Vannarith November 2008 With Compliments This Working Paper series presents papers in a preliminary form and serves to stimulate comment and discussion. The views expressed are entirely the author’s own and not that of the Cambodian Institute for Cooperation and Peace Published with the funding support from The International Foundation for Arts and Culture, IFAC CICP Working Paper No.25. ii About Cambodian Institute for Cooperation and Peace (CICP) The CICP is an independent, neutral, and non-partisan research institute based in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. The Institute promotes both domestic and regional dialogue between government officials, national and international organizations, scholars, and the private sector on issues of peace, democracy, civil society, security, foreign policy, conflict resolution, economics and national development. In this regard, the institute endeavors to: organize forums, lectures, local, regional and international workshops and conference on various development and international issues; design and conduct trainings to civil servants and general public to build capacity in various topics especially in economic development and international cooperation; participate and share ideas in domestic, regional and international forums, workshops and conferences; promote peace and cooperation among Cambodians, as well as between Cambodians and others through regional and international dialogues; and conduct surveys and researches on various topics including socio-economic development, security, strategic studies, international relation, defense management as well as disseminate the resulting research findings. Networking The Institute convenes workshops, seminars and colloquia on aspects of socio-economic development, international relations and security.
    [Show full text]
  • What Drives Urbanisation in Modern Cambodia? Some Counter-Intuitive Findings
    sustainability Article What Drives Urbanisation in Modern Cambodia? Some Counter-Intuitive Findings Partha Gangopadhyay * , Siddharth Jain and Agung Suwandaru School of Business, Western Sydney University, Penrith NSW 2751, Australia; [email protected] (S.J.); [email protected] (A.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 23 October 2020; Accepted: 2 December 2020; Published: 8 December 2020 Abstract: The history of urbanisation in Cambodia is a fascinating case study. During 1965–1973, the Vietnam war triggered the mass migration of Cambodians to the urban centres as its rural economy was virtually annihilated by an unprecedented cascade of aerial bombardments. During the Pol Pot regime, 1975–1979, urban areas were hastily closed down by the Khmer Rouge militia that led to the phase of forced de-urbanisation. With the ouster of the Pol Pot regime, since 1993 a new wave of urbanisation has taken shape for Cambodia. Rising urban population in a few urban regions has triggered multidimensional problems in terms of housing, employment, infrastructure, crime rates and congestions. This paper investigates the significant drivers of urbanisation since 1994 in Cambodia. Despite severe limitations of the availability of relevant data, we have extrapolated the major long-term drivers of urbanization by using autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) analysis and nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) models. Our main finding is that FDI flows have a significant short-run and long-run asymmetric effect on urbanisation. We conclude that an increase in FDI boosts the pull-factor behind rural–urban migration. At the same time, a decrease in FDI impoverishes the economy and promotes the push-factor behind the rural–urban migration.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Management and Administration Project
    Report No. 58016-KH Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Investigation Report Cambodia: Land Management and Public Disclosure Authorized Administration Project (Credit No. 3650 - KH) November 23, 2010 Public Disclosure Authorized About the Panel The Inspection Panel was created in September 1993 by the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank to serve as an independent mechanism to ensure accountability in Bank operations with respect to its policies and procedures. The Inspection Panel is an instrument for groups of two or more private citizens who believe that they or their interests have been or could be harmed by Bank-financed activities to present their concerns through a Request for Inspection. In short, the Panel provides a link between the Bank and the people who are likely to be affected by the projects it finances. Members of the Panel are selected “on the basis of their ability to deal thoroughly and fairly with the request brought to them, their integrity and their independence from the Bank’s Management, and their exposure to developmental issues and to living conditions in developing countries.”1 The three-member Panel is empowered, subject to Board approval, to investigate problems that are alleged to have arisen as a result of the Bank having failed to comply with its own operating policies and procedures. The Panel’s work embraces the fundamental principles of independence, integrity, and impartiality. These cornerstone principles enable the Panel to respond to the issues raised and to provide technically sound, independent assessments to the Bank’s Board. Processing Requests After the Panel receives a Request for Inspection, it is processed as follows: • The Panel decides whether the Request is prima facie not barred from Panel consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Koh Kong Villagers Trade Logging for Agriculture
    R 3464 E MB U N SSUE I TUESDAY, JULY 14, 2020 Intelligent . In-depth . Independent www.phnompenhpost.com 4000 RIEL Koh Kong villagers trade PHNOM PENH SQUATTERS GET logging for agriculture PLOTS OF LAND Khorn Savi used to live in mountainous areas, He said each family in the communi- incomes and fourth, they are safe. wildlife sanctuaries and natural re- ty had been granted land concessions “In the past, residents were no- TO RELOCATE VER 200 families living in source conservation areas along the measuring 25m by 600m to convert madic rice growers. They went to Koh Kong province’s Stung Prat canal and in the Chi Phat them into village lands and planta- clear forest land to grow rice and lat- NATIONAL – page 5 Sovanna Green Village area. tions. He said the plan was to give the er cleared forests in other places. This Community who used to In 2004, they moved to live at So- villagers new job opportunities. affected natural resources, biodiver- Olog timber and hunt wild animals for vanna Green Village, which is located “This project encourages changes to sity and other wild animals,” he said. a living have now turned to agricul- in Botum Sakor district’s Kandorl the livelihoods of residents and aims Pheaktra made the comments when ture to sustain themselves. commune. The village was an agri- to provide them with steady [jobs]. he led over 20 reporters to inspect Ministry of Environment spokes- cultural development project coordi- First, the lands belong to them. Sec- man Neth Pheaktra said the families nated by the Wildlife Alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambodia's Anti- Corruption Regime 2008-2018: a Critical Political
    U4 Issue 2019:1 Cambodia’s anti- corruption regime 2008-2018: A critical political economy approach By Jacqui Baker and Sarah Milne Series editors: Aled Williams and Jessica Schultz Disclaimer All views in this text are the author(s)’, and may differ from the U4 partner agencies’ policies. Partner agencies Australian Government – Department for Foreign Affairs and Trade – DFAT German Corporation for International Cooperation – GIZ German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development – BMZ Global Affairs Canada Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark / Danish International Development Assistance – Danida Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency – Sida Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation – SDC The Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation – Norad UK Aid – Department for International Development About U4 U4 is a team of anti-corruption advisers working to share research and evidence to help international development actors get sustainable results. The work involves dialogue, publications, online training, workshops, helpdesk, and innovation. U4 is a permanent centre at the Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI) in Norway. CMI is a non- profit, multi-disciplinary research institute with social scientists specialising in development studies. www.U4.no [email protected] Cover photo damien_farrell (CC by) https://flic.kr/p/gL5zFE Keywords anti-corruption reforms - Cambodia - China - decentralisation - public financial management - public expenditure tracking Publication type U4 Issue Notes This U4 Issue was updated on 3 May 2018 to address inaccuracies in section 2.3 Public finance management: FMIS and PETS Education. Creative commons This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Cambodia’s anti-corruption reforms have been critical to consolidating power in the hands of the ruling Cambodian People’s Party.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Whole World Is Watching”: Intimate Geopolitics of Forced Eviction and Women's Activism in Cambodia
    “The Whole World Is Watching”: Intimate Geopolitics of Forced Eviction and Women’s Activism in Cambodia Katherine Brickell Department of Geography, Royal Holloway, University of London Through fourteen in-depth interviews1 conducted in February 2013 with women from Boeung Kak Lake—a high-profile community under threat in Phnom Penh—this article argues that the occurrence of, and activism against, forced eviction is an embodiment of “intimate geopolitics.” The article demonstrates the manifold rela- tionship that forced eviction reflects and ferments between homes, bodies, the nation-state, and the geopolitical transformation of Southeast Asia. Forced eviction is framed as a geopolitical issue, one that leads to innermost incursions into everyday life, one that has spurred on active citizenship and collective action evidencing the injustices of dispossession to diverse audiences, and one that has rendered female activists’ intimate relationships further vulnerable. In doing so, it charts how Boeung Kak Lake women have rewritten the political script in Cambodia by publicly contesting the inevitability accorded to human rights abuses in the post-genocide country. Key Words: activism, Cambodia, forced eviction, home, women. !!!! 2013 !!", !#!"!!——!!#$!$!!!"!!!"!!——!!!"!"!!!"!", ! "%!#$!#!!&$%!#$!%!, ! “'"""!!” !!!"!""""#$!#!!!!!"#"#, &$(&)!""!!'$*!%#$"#!"$#""#$"!%+""!!!"!, !!#$!"&!!!# $; #$!#,#'%"(-!!!!, +#!"$$!",#$!.$/; #$#"#%#!!%!!!'"#" '"$""#"!"!"&!!, "$""!!!!!#%!'%$!"%$#")"##"0(#!!.("& !, &$'*#$!!!#!" #"%: !!%/, *#$, #$, #, !!" Con base en catorce entrevistas a profundidad llevadas a cabo en febrero de 2013 entre mujeres del Lago Boeung Kak—una comunidad destacada y vulnerable de Phnom Penh—este art´ıculo sostiene que la ocurrencia del desalojo forzado y el activismo contra el mismo se pueden considerar como una personificacion´ de la “geopol´ıtica ´ıntima.” En el art´ıculo se demuestra la multiple´ relacion´ que reflejan el desalojo forzado y las conmociones entre hogares, cuerpos, el estado-nacion´ y la transformacion´ geopol´ıtica del Sudeste de Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Activities on the 2017 Elections Commune Sangkat
    Committee For Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia (COMFREL) #138, Str 122 Teuk Laak 1, Toulkork, Phnom Penh xumE®hVl Box: 1145 COMFREL Tel: 023 884 150 Fax:023 885 745 Email [email protected], [email protected] Website www.comfrel.org Final Assessment and Report on the 2017 Commune Council Elections Contents Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Foreword ................................................................................................................................................. 7 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 8 2. Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 9 2.1. Principal Findings .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 What Others Say ........................................................................................................................... 17 2.3 Overall Assessment ...................................................................................................................... 19 3. Political Environment ......................................................................................................................... 19 3.1 Unilateral legislative changes contrary
    [Show full text]
  • Here a Causal Relationship? Contemporary Economics, 9(1), 45–60
    Bibliography on Corruption and Anticorruption Professor Matthew C. Stephenson Harvard Law School http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/mstephenson/ March 2021 Aaken, A., & Voigt, S. (2011). Do individual disclosure rules for parliamentarians improve government effectiveness? Economics of Governance, 12(4), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-011-0100-8 Aaronson, S. A. (2011a). Does the WTO Help Member States Clean Up? Available at SSRN 1922190. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1922190 Aaronson, S. A. (2011b). Limited partnership: Business, government, civil society, and the public in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). Public Administration and Development, 31(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.588 Aaronson, S. A., & Abouharb, M. R. (2014). Corruption, Conflicts of Interest and the WTO. In J.-B. Auby, E. Breen, & T. Perroud (Eds.), Corruption and conflicts of interest: A comparative law approach (pp. 183–197). Edward Elgar PubLtd. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hul.ebookbatch.GEN_batch:ELGAR01620140507 Abbas Drebee, H., & Azam Abdul-Razak, N. (2020). The Impact of Corruption on Agriculture Sector in Iraq: Econometrics Approach. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 553(1), 12019-. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/553/1/012019 Abbink, K., Dasgupta, U., Gangadharan, L., & Jain, T. (2014). Letting the briber go free: An experiment on mitigating harassment bribes. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 111(Journal Article), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.12.012 Abbink, Klaus. (2004). Staff rotation as an anti-corruption policy: An experimental study. European Journal of Political Economy, 20(4), 887–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2003.10.008 Abbink, Klaus.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Office 2000
    2019 Annual Narrative Report COMFREL April 2020 Table of Content I. Executive Summary ---------------- 01 II. About COMFREL ---------------------- 03 III. Completed Activities during this period ----------------- 04 IV. Staff Capacity and Organizational Development --------------- 17 V. Summary of Financial Statement --------------- 18 I. Executive Summary uring the 2019 period, COMFREL, its staff During the radio program broadcasting, members, its board members, and member COMFREL was live on Facebook for two times D organizations at all levels carried out activities per day. They got 910,003 views, 37,852 Likes, based on the project title in COMFREL’s annual 13,726 shares and 1,298 comments. After work. COMFREL has achieved the following: broadcasting and uploading to the website, there were 25,415 downloads of the radio programs Program 1. Education for Democracy and from COMFREL’s website. COMFREL radio Elections Program program was included in the RadioKhmer app for To create an opportunity for people to learn smartphone access. about the principles of democracy and genuine In addition to radio programming, COMFREL elections and to discuss the recommendations has a Facebook page to disseminate information regarding genuine elections, at least seven debates regarding society, politics, and economics. There were organized on the topic of “Principles of were 4,736 articles on democracy, elections, and Democracy and Genuine Elections” in seven good governance released, 8 press releases and 21 provinces including Battambong, Kandal, Siem video animation spots (4 videos regarding gender Reap, Banteay Meachey, Kompot, Kampong equality produced and uploaded on COMFREL’s Chnang, and Kampong Cham province. The Facebook page. 21 Video animation spots got debates were attended by 460 participants (230 165,491 views, 10,785 likes, 3,502 shares and 340 female) ranging from university students, CSOs, comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Prime Minister Sends Park Packing
    Phnom Penh Post - Prime Minister sends park packing A 2013 Cambodia National Rescue Party at Freedom Park. Vireak Mai Prime Minister sends park packing Wed, 7 December 2016 Lay Samean Freedom Park, the 1-hectare public square in the centre of Phnom Penh that the government in November 2010 designated as the city’s sole authorised zone for protests, is set to be moved next to a petrol warehouse along National Road 5, officials said yesterday. The relocation was first announced in a morning speech by Prime Minister Hun Sen, who said moving the protest zone to the outskirts would help beautify the city. Yet the opposition CNRP, which has made liberal use of the park in the past, criticised the decision. Speaking at the 18th Disabled Persons’ Day at Koh Pich, Hun Sen said he had been in contact with Phnom Penh’s governor about the effort to move Freedom Park somewhere less visible, adding that the relocation would have no impact on freedom of expression. “Recently, I called Pa Soche-atvong, because now we will perhaps not keep Freedom Park in the middle of the capital creating problems. [Interior Minister] Sar Kheng told Pa Socheatvong to look for a new Freedom Park,” Hun Sen told his audience. “It will possibly be on National Road 5, at Kilometre 6, and we will transform that location into a public park,” he said. “The gatherings will not be different from the current ones, since people don’t go to look there, they watch it via broadcasts or Facebook.” City Hall spokesman Mean Chanyada said authorities had not settled on the exact location along National Road 5 for the new Freedom Park but that a large Sokimex gas station not far from the Chroy Changvar bridge was the preferred location.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambodia: Human Rights Before and After the Elections
    May 1993 Vol.5 No.10 CAMBODIA: HUMAN RIGHTS BEFORE AND AFTER THE ELECTIONS I. INTRODUCTION Cambodians will go to the polls on May 23 in an atmosphere of political and ethnic violence and renewed civil war. The elections are the culmination of a 17-month United Nations presence, the largest, most ambitious and most expensive peace-keeping effort ever, which was supposed to bring about an end to the conflict. Instead, Cambodia is faced with as much fighting as when the United Nations Transitional Authority in Cambodia (UNTAC) entered the country in March 1992, and a spiralling level of serious human rights abuses. The "neutral political environment" that was supposed to be the precondition for elections is entirely absent. The five permanent members of the Security Council and other drafters of the 1991 Paris peace accords, formally known as the Agreements on a Comprehensive Political Settlement of the Cambodia Conflict, are determined to go ahead with the elections regardless. But what happens on May 23 is almost less important than what happens in the days after the results are announced. Asia Watch believes that an analysis of the missteps that led to the current human rights situation is critically important to determining how, or perhaps whether, human rights of Cambodians can be protected under whatever government comes to power then. The reasons for the deterioration in the human rights situation in late 1992 and early 1993 are complex. None of the parties to the conflict has a history of respect for human rights and one, Democratic Kampuchea, better known as the Khmer Rouge, has one of the worst human rights records in modern history.
    [Show full text]