Two Species with an Unusual Combination of Traits Dominate Responses of British Grasshoppers and Crickets to Environmental Change
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Articulata 2012 27 (1/2): 1728 Zoogeographie
© Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopterologie e.V.; download http://www.dgfo-articulata.de/; www.zobodat.at ARTICULATA 2012 27 (1/2): 1728 ZOOGEOGRAPHIE Small scale ecological zoogeographic methods in explanation of the distribution patterns of grasshoppers Kenyeres, Z., & Rácz, I.A. Abstract We examined in this study, in a Central-European low mountain range, whether methods of ecological zoogeography can explain better the distribution patterns of grasshopper species and species-groups, than the methods of the historical zoogeography. Our results showed that zoogeographically defined microregions could be specified more precisely by the distribution of species groups of differ- ent eco-types than the distribution of species groups of the different faunal-types. We found that the macroclimate elements and landscape features determine the regional distribution patterns of the orthopteran species and species-groups with similar thermal and humidity requirements. Our case study revealed the impor- tant role of the ecological zoogeography in zoogeographical analyses of Orthop- tera fauna at small geographical scale. Zusammenfassung Wir haben untersucht, ob man mit ökologisch-tiergeographischen Methoden die Verteilungsmuster von Heuschrecken in einem mitteleuropäischen Mittelgebirge analysieren kann. Unsere Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die Unterschiede auf dem Niveau der Mikroregion bei den Heuschrecken nicht in den Fauna-Typen, son- dern in der Verteilung von Tierarten bzw. Tiergruppen mit unterschiedlichen öko- logischen Ansprüchen zu finden sind. Wir können somit die Elemente des Makro- klimas und die Merkmale der Landschaft identifizieren, die das lokale Vertei- lungsmuster von Artengruppen mit ähnlichen ökologischen Ansprüchen, bezie- hungsweise von bestimmten Tierarten bestimmen. Introduction Questions and methodology in the biogeographical searching have been domi- nated by the conceptions of the historical biogeography for a long time. -
Zum Rückgang Von Stenobothrus Stigmaticus Im Südwestlichen Waldviertel (Orthoptera: Caelifera) W
©Österr. Ges. f. Entomofaunistik, Wien, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Beiträge zur Entomofaunistik 12 95-103 Wien, Dezember 2011 Zum Rückgang von Stenobothrus stigmaticus im südwestlichen Waldviertel (Orthoptera: Caelifera) W. Schweighofer * Abstract In Austria Stenobothrus stigmaticus is an endagered species with its main populations in the western Waldviertel. There it is focussed on the occurrence of the grass Nardus stricta. In the southwestern Waldviertel ten locations were investigated in the 1990´s and again in Sommer 2011. In 2011 just three (30 %) of these ten locations were still inhabitated, while on the other locations due to different changes in the habitats the species could not be found any more. The reasons for the dramatic decline are discussed and protection measures proposed. Keywords: Stenobothrus stigmaticus, decline, Waldviertel Zusammenfassung Der in Österreich stark gefährdete Kleine Heidegrashüpfer (Stenobothrus stigmaticus) besitzt einen österreichischen Verbreitungsschwerpunkt im westlichen Waldviertel. Die Art ist dort an fl ächige Vorkommen des Borstgrases Nardus stricta gebunden. Im südwestlichen Waldviertel konnten in den 1990er Jahren zehn Fundorte kartiert werden, die im Sommer 2011 neuerlich kontrolliert wurden. Es stellte sich heraus, dass die Art nur mehr an drei (30 %) dieser zehn Fundpunkte bestätigt werden konnte, während sie an den restlichen durch unterschiedliche Veränderungen im Habitat nicht mehr nachweisbar war. Die Ursachen des dramatischen Bestandsrückgangs werden diskutiert und Schutzmaßnahmen vorgeschlagen. Einleitung Der Kleine Heidegrashüpfer (Stenobothrus stigmaticus) ist eine in Österreich nur regional verbreitete Heuschreckenart, die in der Roten Liste für Österreich als „endangered“ (stark gefährdet) eingestuft wird (BERG et al. 2005). Sie kommt in den Bundesländern Tirol, Oberösterreich, Niederösterreich, Kärnten, Steiermark und Burgenland vor (BERG & ZUNA- KRATKY 1997). -
Grasshopper Strips Prove Effective in Enhancing Grasshopper Abundance in Rivenhall Churchyard, Essex, England
Conservation Evidence (2011) 8, 31-37 www.ConservationEvidence.com Grasshopper strips prove effective in enhancing grasshopper abundance in Rivenhall Churchyard, Essex, England Tim Gardiner 1* , Michelle Gardiner 1 & Nigel Cooper 2 12 Beech Road, Rivenhall, Witham, Essex CM8 3PF, UK 2Anglia Ruskin University, East Road, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] SUMMARY Grasshopper strips (alternate, 1-m wide strips of uncut and cut grassland) are a novel conservation feature in a rural churchyard in the village of Rivenhall (Essex), southeast England. The effectiveness of these strips in enhancing the abundance of grasshoppers (Acrididae) was investigated during the summer of 2010 using sweep-net surveys. Two grasshopper species were recorded. The meadow grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus was significantly more abundant in the cut grasshopper strips than in nearby short grassland (control) plots regularly mown throughout the summer. The field grasshopper Chorthippus brunneus was contrastingly more abundant in the uncut grasshopper strips than in the controls. The grasshopper strips appear to provide a mosaic of short and tall grassland in close proximity which is required for nymphs and adults of both C. parallelus and C. brunneus . BACKGROUND grasshoppers (and also butterflies and dragonflies) in Essex, southeast England There are over 20,000 churchyards in England (Gardiner & Pye 2001). For example, in All and Wales, and they can be havens for wildlife Saints Churchyard in the village of Writtle, as well as burial grounds (Greenoak 1993). five species of Orthoptera (grasshoppers and Churchyards provide wildlife habitats both in bush-crickets) were recorded in a conservation built-up and rural areas, assuming increasing area managed by a traditional hay-cut in conservation importance as urban areas August, but were absent from adjacent short expand and ‘greenspace’ is lost, and as grassland sward mown regularly (every 2-3 agricultural practices intensify (Rackham weeks) throughout the summer. -
Mottled Grasshopper Translocation to Sand Dunes in Essex, England
The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or any of the funding organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN. Published by: IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group & Environment Agency-ABU DHABI Copyright: © 2011 International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Citation: Soorae, P. S. (ed.) (2011). Global Re-introduction Perspectives: 2011. More case studies from around the globe. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group and Abu Dhabi, UAE: Environment Agency-Abu Dhabi. xiv + 250 pp. ISBN: 978-2-8317-1432-5 Cover photo: Clockwise starting from top-left: i. Mountain yellow-legged frog © Adam Backlin ii. American alligator © Ruth Elsey iii. Dwarf eelgrass © Laura Govers, RU Nijmegen iv. Mangrove finch © Michael Dvorak BirdLife Austria v. Berg-Breede whitefish © N. Dean Impson vi. Zanzibar red colobus monkey © Tom Butynski & Yvonne de Jong Cover design & layout by: Pritpal S. Soorae, IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group Produced by: IUCN/SSC Re-introduction Specialist Group & Environment Agency-ABU DHABI Download at: www.iucnsscrsg.org iii Invertebrates Mottled grasshopper translocation to sand dunes in Essex, England Tim Gardiner Environment Agency, Fisheries, Recreation & Biodiversity (FRB), Iceni House, Cobham Road, Ipswich, Suffolk, IP3 9JD, UK [email protected] Introduction The mottled grasshopper (Myrmeleotettix maculatus (Orthoptera: Acrididae)) is widely distributed, but not necessarily common, throughout mainland Britain. -
Zum Erstfund Des Rotleibigen Grashüpfers Omocestus
6. Literatur BLAB et al . , Hr sg. (19B4): Rote Liste der gefährdeten Tiere und Pflanzen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland , Greven: Kilda. MINISTER FÜR UMWELT, Hr sg. (1988): Rot e Liste der bedrohten Tier- und Pfla nzenarten im Saarland, Saarbrücken. NIET HA MMER , J., KRAPP F., HRSG. (1982): Handbu ch der Säugetiere Europas. SC HR ÖPFER, FELDMANN , VIER HAU S (1984): Die Säugetiere Westfalens , Abh andlg. au s dem Westfälischen Museum für Naturkunde, Münster Anschrift der Verfasser: Dipl. Geogr. Dieter DDRDA Dip l. Geogr. Dr. Stephan MAAS Dipl. Biol. Alo ysius ST AUDT ARBEIT SGEMEIN SC HAFT FÜR ÖKOLOGIE An der Saar 18 - 18 6630 Saarlouis ZUM ERSTFUND DES ROTLEIBIGEN GRASHÜPFERS DMOCESTUS HAEMORRHOIDALIS, CHARP., (Insecta: Sal tatoria) IM SAARLAND Von Dieter DORDA Omocestus gehört zur Unterfamilie Gomphocerinae (Grashüpfer) der Familie Acrididae (Feldheuschrecken). Feldheuschrecken, Knarrschrecken (Catantopidae) und Dornschrecken (Tetrigidae) werden zur Unt erordnung Caelifera (Kurzfühlerschrek- ke n ) gerechnet. Einige Gattungen der Grashüpfer wie Stenobothrus, Chorthippus und Omocestus sind im Gelände nur schwer vo neina nd er zu unterschei - den. Vielfach ist ein Geschlechtsdimorphismus ausgebildet, der die Verwechslung mit einer anderen Art möglich macht. So ist das Weibchen vo n Omocestus haemorrhoidalis mit Myrmeleotettix maculatus, der Gefleckten Keulenschrecke , das Männchen mit dem vo n Stenobothrus stigmaticus, dem Kleinen Heidegrashüpfer , zu verwechseln. Omocestus haemorrhoidalis ist eher unauffällig. Möglicherweise wurde sie im Saarland bislang übersehen, denn nur am Gesang läßt sich die Ar t im Gelände zuverlässig von a nd eren in Frage kommen - den Heuschrecken unterscheiden. 90 Der Gesang von Omocestus haemorrhoidalis ist sehr leise und hört sich mechanisch, hämmernd monoton an und erinnert entfernt an den Gesang des Feldschwirls . -
Transmission Rates of the B Chromosome of Myrmeleote7tix Maculatus (Orthoptera: Acrididae) M
Heredity (1984), 53 (2), 259—268 1984. The Genetical Society of Great Britain THEEFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON MEIOTIC TRANSMISSION RATES OF THE B CHROMOSOME OF MYRMELEOTE7TIX MACULATUS (ORTHOPTERA: ACRIDIDAE) M. W. SHAW* AND G. M. HEWIU School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR3 7 TJ, U. K. Received19.xii.83 SUMMARY Meiotic drive of B-chromosomes in Myrmeleotettix maculatus females decreased slightly during the course of egg-laying but was not detectably different under different temperature regimes. A proportion of males, however, showed substan- tially reduced transmission of the B chromosome when maintained at lower temperatures. This could explain some of the geographic variation in B chromo- some frequency that has been observed. 1. INTRODUCTION The B chromosome polymorphism of the heathiand grasshopper Myr- meleotettix maculatus is restricted to the southern and central parts of the U.K., although the animal itself is much more widespread (e.g., Hewitt and John, 1967). This restricted range may be due in part to historical and geographical accidents—there is evidence that in at least one part of the boundary of the B chromosome distribution the B may still be spreading (Shaw, 1983). However, it is also likely that the equilibrium B frequency varies from place to place. For example, Hewitt and Ruscoe (1971) examined both microclimatic variables and B frequency in a series of populations along a 1 km transect in the Welsh hills near Aberystwyth. It was clear that where the microclimate was cooler, the B frequency was lower. This suggests that the B might be restricted to the southern U.K. -
A Comparative Analysis of the Orthoptera (Insecta) from the Republic of Moldova and Some Regions of Palaearctic
Muzeul Olteniei Craiova. Oltenia. Studii i comunicri. tiinele Naturii. Tom. 26, No. 2/2010 ISSN 1454-6914 A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ORTHOPTERA (INSECTA) FROM THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND SOME REGIONS OF PALAEARCTIC STAHI Nadejda Abstract. In this work, it is given a comparative analysis of the species belonging to the Orthoptera order (Insecta) from the Republic of Moldova with other regions and countries of the Palaearctic region like: Romania, Ukraine, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Slovak Republic, Bulgaria, Catalonia (Spain), Switzerland, Turkey, Baikal Regions (Russia), and S-W Tajikistan. The highest percentage of similarity between the Orthoptera fauna of the Republic of Moldava and the surrounding countries, proved to be with the Orthoptera fauna from Ukraine and Romania. Keywords: comparative analysis, Orthoptera, Palaearctic, similarity. Rezumat. Analiza comparativ a ortopterelor (Insecta) din Republica Moldova i unele regiuni din Palearctica. În lucrare este prezentat analiza comparativ a faunei insectelor ordinului Orthoptera (Insecta) din Republica Moldova cu cea a unor regiuni sau ;ri din regiunea Palearctic: România, Ucraina, Slovenia, Cehia, Slovacia, Bulgaria, Catalonia (Spania), Elveia, Turcia, Regiunea Baical (Russia) i S-V Tadjikistan. Cel mai înalt procent de similaritate privind fauna ortopterelor Republicii Moldova cu rile i regiunile cercetate, s-a dovedit a fi cu fauna ortopterelor din Ucraina i România. Cuvinte cheie: analiza comparativ, Orthoptera, Palearctica, similaritate. INTRODUCTION The Republic of Moldova is situated in the southeastern part of Europe, at the junction of the great geobotanical regions: Euro-Asiatic, European, and Mediterranean (GHEIDEMAN, 1986). The whole surface of the country is 33,700 km2. In accordance with the territorial surface, the republic of Moldova is one of the smallest countries of Europe. -
Conservation Assessment for the Kansan Spikerush Leafhopper (Dorydiella Kansana Beamer)
Conservation Assessment For The Kansan spikerush leafhopper (Dorydiella kansana Beamer) USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region January 11, 2005 James Bess OTIS Enterprises 13501 south 750 west Wanatah, Indiana 46390 This document is undergoing peer review, comments welcome This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on the subject taxon or community; or this document was prepared by another organization and provides information to serve as a Conservation Assessment for the Eastern Region of the Forest Service. It does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if you have information that will assist in conserving the subject taxon, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service - Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 580 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................ 1 NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY ..................................................................................... 1 DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES....................................................................................................... -
Orthoptera, Acrididae) at Non-Outbreaking and Outbreaking Situations
SHORT COMMUNICATION Longevity and fecundity of Dichroplus maculipennis (Orthoptera, Acrididae) at non-outbreaking and outbreaking situations Yanina Mariottini1, María Laura De Wysiecki1 & Carlos Ernesto Lange1,2 1Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores (UNLP- CCT La Plata- CONICET). Calle 2 Nº 584, Código postal 1900, La Plata, Argentina. [email protected], [email protected] 2Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas provincia de Buenos Aires. [email protected] ABSTRACT. Longevity and fecundity of Dichroplus maculipennis (Orthoptera, Acrididae) at non-outbreaking and outbreaking situations. Dichroplus maculipennis is one of the most characteristic and damaging grasshopper species of Argentina, mainly in areas of the Pampas and Patagonia regions. We estimated and compared the longevity and fecundity of adult female D. maculipennis under controlled conditions (30°C, 14L:10D, 40% RH) from individuals collected as last instar nymphs (VI) in the field and with a known recent history of low and high density conditions. Densities of D. maculipennis at the collecting sites were 0.95 individuals per m2 in 2006 and 46 ind/m2 in 2009, representing non-outbreaking and outbreaking situations, respectively. Adult female longev- ity in 2006 (67.96 ± 3.2 days) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in 2009 (37.44 ± 1.98 days). The number of egg-pods per female was 3.32 ± 0.44 for 2006 and 1.62 ± 0.26 for 2009. The average fecundity in 2006 (89.29 ± 11.9 eggs/female) was signifi- cantly greater (p < 0.05) than that in 2009 (36.27 ± 5.82 eggs/female). While it was observed that the oviposition rate was higher in 2006, this difference was not significant (p > 0.05). -
Invertebrate Distribution and Diversity Assessment at the U. S. Army Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site a Report to the U
Invertebrate Distribution and Diversity Assessment at the U. S. Army Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site A report to the U. S. Army and U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service G. J. Michels, Jr., J. L. Newton, H. L. Lindon, and J. A. Brazille Texas AgriLife Research 2301 Experiment Station Road Bushland, TX 79012 2008 Report Introductory Notes The invertebrate survey in 2008 presented an interesting challenge. Extremely dry conditions prevailed throughout most of the adult activity period for the invertebrates and grass fires occurred several times throughout the summer. By visual assessment, plant resources were scarce compared to last year, with few green plants and almost no flowering plants. Eight habitats and nine sites continued to be sampled in 2008. The Ponderosa pine/ yellow indiangrass site was removed from the study after the low numbers of species and individuals collected there in 2007. All other sites from the 2007 survey were included in the 2008 survey. We also discontinued the collection of Coccinellidae in the 2008 survey, as only 98 individuals from four species were collected in 2007. Pitfall and malaise trapping were continued in the same way as the 2007 survey. Sweep net sampling was discontinued to allow time for Asilidae and Orthoptera timed surveys consisting of direct collection of individuals with a net. These surveys were conducted in the same way as the time constrained butterfly (Papilionidea and Hesperoidea) surveys, with 15-minute intervals for each taxanomic group. This was sucessful when individuals were present, but the dry summer made it difficult to assess the utility of these techniques because of overall low abundance of insects. -
About the Book the Format Acknowledgments
About the Book For more than ten years I have been working on a book on bryophyte ecology and was joined by Heinjo During, who has been very helpful in critiquing multiple versions of the chapters. But as the book progressed, the field of bryophyte ecology progressed faster. No chapter ever seemed to stay finished, hence the decision to publish online. Furthermore, rather than being a textbook, it is evolving into an encyclopedia that would be at least three volumes. Having reached the age when I could retire whenever I wanted to, I no longer needed be so concerned with the publish or perish paradigm. In keeping with the sharing nature of bryologists, and the need to educate the non-bryologists about the nature and role of bryophytes in the ecosystem, it seemed my personal goals could best be accomplished by publishing online. This has several advantages for me. I can choose the format I want, I can include lots of color images, and I can post chapters or parts of chapters as I complete them and update later if I find it important. Throughout the book I have posed questions. I have even attempt to offer hypotheses for many of these. It is my hope that these questions and hypotheses will inspire students of all ages to attempt to answer these. Some are simple and could even be done by elementary school children. Others are suitable for undergraduate projects. And some will take lifelong work or a large team of researchers around the world. Have fun with them! The Format The decision to publish Bryophyte Ecology as an ebook occurred after I had a publisher, and I am sure I have not thought of all the complexities of publishing as I complete things, rather than in the order of the planned organization. -
The Transcriptomic and Genomic Architecture of Acrididae Grasshoppers
The Transcriptomic and Genomic Architecture of Acrididae Grasshoppers Dissertation To Fulfil the Requirements for the Degree of “Doctor of Philosophy” (PhD) Submitted to the Council of the Faculty of Biological Sciences of the Friedrich Schiller University Jena by Bachelor of Science, Master of Science, Abhijeet Shah born on 7th November 1984, Hyderabad, India 1 Academic reviewers: 1. Prof. Holger Schielzeth, Friedrich Schiller University Jena 2. Prof. Manja Marz, Friedrich Schiller University Jena 3. Prof. Rolf Beutel, Friedrich Schiller University Jena 4. Prof. Frieder Mayer, Museum für Naturkunde Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung, Berlin 5. Prof. Steve Hoffmann, Leibniz Institute on Aging – Fritz Lipmann Institute, Jena 6. Prof. Aletta Bonn, Friedrich Schiller University Jena Date of oral defense: 24.02.2020 2 Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 5 Zusammenfassung............................................................................................................ 7 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 9 Genetic polymorphism ............................................................................................................. 9 Lewontin’s paradox ....................................................................................................................................... 9 The evolution