Desiccation prels 19/3/02 1:42 pm Page i
Desiccation and Survival in Plants
Drying Without Dying Desiccation prels 19/3/02 1:42 pm Page ii Desiccation prels 19/3/02 1:42 pm Page iii
Desiccation and Survival in Plants
Drying Without Dying
Edited by
M. Black
King’s College University of London UK
and
H.W. Pritchard
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew Wakehurst Place UK
CABI Publishing Desiccation prels 4/4/02 2:16 pm Page iv
CABI Publishing is a division of CAB International CABI Publishing CABI Publishing CAB International 10 E 40th Street Wallingford Suite 3203 Oxon OX10 8DE New York, NY 10016 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 Tel: +1 212 481 7018 Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 Fax: +1 212 686 7993 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Web site: www.cabi-publishing.org
© CAB International 2002. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of the copyright owners.
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Desiccation and survival in plants : drying without dying / edited by M. Black and H.W. Pritchard. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ). ISBN 0-85199-534-9 (alk. paper) 1. Plants--Drying. 2. Plant-water relationships. 3. Plants--Adaptation. I. Black, Michael. II. Pritchard, H. W. QK870 .D57 2002 581.4--dc21
2001043835 ISBN 0 85199 534 9
Typeset in Melior by Columns Design Ltd, Reading Printed and bound in the UK by Biddles Ltd, Guildford and King’s Lynn Desiccation prels 19/3/02 1:42 pm Page v
Contents
Contributors vii Preface ix
PART I. INTRODUCTION 1 1 Drying Without Dying 3 Peter Alpert and Melvin J. Oliver
PART II. METHODOLOGY 45 2 Methods for the Study of Water Relations Under Desiccation Stress 47 Wendell Q. Sun 3 Experimental Aspects of Drying and Recovery 93 Norman W. Pammenter, Patricia Berjak, James Wesley-Smith and Clare Vander Willigen 4 Biochemical and Biophysical Methods for Quantifying Desiccation Phenomena in Seeds and Vegetative Tissues 111 Olivier Leprince and Elena A. Golovina
PART III. BIOLOGY OF DEHYDRATION 147 5 Desiccation Sensitivity in Orthodox and Recalcitrant Seeds in Relation to Development 149 Allison R. Kermode and Bill E. Finch-Savage 6 Pollen and Spores: Desiccation Tolerance in Pollen and the Spores of Lower Plants and Fungi 185 Folkert A. Hoekstra 7 Vegetative Tissues: Bryophytes, Vascular Resurrection Plants and Vegetative Propagules 207 Michael C.F. Proctor and Valerie C. Pence 8 Systematic and Evolutionary Aspects of Desiccation Tolerance in Seeds 239 John B. Dickie and Hugh W. Pritchard
v Desiccation prels 19/3/02 1:42 pm Page vi
vi Contents
PART IV. MECHANISMS OF DAMAGE AND TOLERANCE 261 9 Desiccation Stress and Damage 263 Christina Walters, Jill M. Farrant, Norman W. Pammenter and Patricia Berjak 10 Biochemistry and Biophysics of Tolerance Systems 293 Julia Buitink, Folkert A. Hoekstra and Olivier Leprince 11 Molecular Genetics of Desiccation and Tolerant Systems 319 Jonathan R. Phillips, Melvin J. Oliver and Dorothea Bartels 12 Rehydration of Dried Systems: Membranes and the Nuclear Genome 343 Daphne J. Osborne, Ivan Boubriak and Olivier Leprince
PART V. RETROSPECT AND PROSPECT 365 13 Damage and Tolerance in Retrospect and Prospect 367 Michael Black, Ralph L. Obendorf and Hugh W. Pritchard Glossary 373 Taxonomic Index 383 Subject Index 401 Desiccation prels 19/3/02 1:42 pm Page vii
Contributors
Peter Alpert, Biology Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003-5810, USA. [email protected] Dorothea Bartels, Institute of Botany, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1, D-53115 Bonn, Germany. [email protected] Patricia Berjak, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa. [email protected] Michael Black, Division of Life Sciences, King’s College, Franklin Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 6NN, UK. [email protected] Ivan Boubriak, The Oxford Research Unit, Open University, Foxcombe Hall, Boars Hill OX1 5HR, UK. [email protected] Julia Buitink, UMR Physiologie Moléculaire des Semences, Institut National d’Horticulture, 16 Bd Lavoisier, F49045 Angers, France. [email protected] John B. Dickie, Seed Conservation Department, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Wakehurst Place, Ardingly, West Sussex RH17 6TN, UK. [email protected] Jill M. Farrant, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Cape Town, 7700, South Africa. [email protected] Bill E. Finch-Savage, Horticulture Research International, Wellesbourne, Warwick CV35 9EF, UK. bill.fi[email protected] Elena A. Golovina, Laboratory of Plant Physiology, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Wageningen, Arboretumlaan 4, 6703 BD Wageningen, The Netherlands and Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Botanicheskaya 35, Moscow 127276, Russia. [email protected] Folkert A. Hoekstra, Laboratory of Plant Physiology, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Wageningen, Arboretumlaan 4, 6703 BD Wageningen, The Netherlands. Folkert. [email protected] Allison R. Kermode, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada. [email protected] Olivier Leprince, UMR Physiologie Moléculaire des Semences, Institut National d’Horticulture, 16 Bd Lavoisier, F49045 Angers, France. [email protected] Ralph L. Obendorf, Seed Biology, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA. [email protected] Melvin J. Oliver, USDA-ARS Plant Stress and Germplasm Development Unit, 3810 4th Street, Lubbock, Texas 79415, USA. [email protected]
vii Desiccation prels 19/3/02 1:42 pm Page viii
viii Contributors
Daphne J. Osborne, The Oxford Research Unit, Open University, Foxcombe Hall, Boars Hill OX1 5HR, UK. [email protected] Norman W. Pammenter, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa. [email protected] Valerie C. Pence, CREW, Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Garden, 3400 Vine Street, Cincinnati, OH 45220, USA. [email protected] Jonathan R. Phillips, Max-Planck-Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Carl-von-Linné- Weg 10, D-550829 Köln, Germany. [email protected] Hugh W. Pritchard, Seed Conservation Department, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Wakehurst Place, Ardingly, West Sussex RH17 6TN, UK. [email protected] Michael C.F. Proctor, School of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Laboratories, Perry Road, Exeter EX4 4QG, UK. [email protected] Wendell Q. Sun, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260. [email protected] Clare Vander Willigen, Department of Botany, University of Capetown, Private Bag, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa. [email protected] Christina Walters, USDA-ARS National Seed Storage Laboratory, 1111 South Mason Street, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA. [email protected] James Wesley-Smith, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa. [email protected] Desiccation prels 19/3/02 1:42 pm Page ix
Preface
Plant survival of desiccation as sporophytic and gametophytic tissues was last reviewed in detail in two books published in 1980. The first, by J. Levitt, on Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses, Volume II, Water, Radiation, Salt and Other Stresses is a classic. The topic of plant water stress consumes about 200 pages and is set mainly at the introductory level but is still of sufficient detail to stimulate post-graduate researchers. Interestingly, there is no mention in Levitt’s book of desiccation sensitivity in seeds. However, this latter topic was specifically covered in another book by H.F. Chin and E.H. Roberts (Recalcitrant Seeds). At that time recalcitrant seed behaviour was something of a novelty and the book deals mainly with descriptions of germination, a listing of species with such seeds and an indication of how best to store the material in the short term. Aspects of plant desiccation have been considered in other publications dealing with the biology and biophysics of dehydration and in contributions to general works on seeds but a comprehensive treatment of desiccation and plant survival is not yet available. Since 1980 there has been a revolution in plant science as new methods of cell and molecular biology and biophysics have been applied to environmental stress, particularly in relation to desiccation tolerance. The basic level of under- standing of how plant cells cope with extreme water stress has increased tremendously and considerable effort has been made in the last 10 years to develop diagnostic markers for desiccation tolerance. At the physiological level, studies have often focused on seed material and on the responses of resurrection plants. At a more mechanistic level, model membrane systems have been used extensively, and exploration of the molecular genetics of desiccation tolerance has begun on developmental mutants, especially of seeds of crop species. These progressive but fundamental changes in approach to investigating the basis of survival of plant tissues under desiccation since the 1980s have meant that our perceptions of this subject have altered significantly. It seems particular appropriate now to take stock of these recent developments, to assess critically the importance of the experimental systems available for investigation and to
ix Desiccation prels 19/3/02 1:42 pm Page x
x Preface
consider possible foci for future research work. This book sets out to address these issues. The Introduction surveys the topic of desiccation, and the remain- der of the book is divided into four parts, dealing with: (i) the technical back- ground to desiccation tolerance studies; (ii) the frequency and levels of dehydration stress tolerance in biological systems; (iii) mechanisms of damage and tolerance; and (iv) a brief retrospect and prospect. It will not attempt to address in detail plant drought stress (i.e. at relatively high water potentials). This subject has been covered in detail in the last 10 years, for example in Environmental Stress in Plants – Biochemical and Physiological Mechanisms (Cherry. J.H. (ed.), Springer Verlag, 1989) and Plants Under Stress (Jones, H.G., Flowers, T.J. and Jones, M.B. (eds), SEB Seminar Series, Cambridge, 1989). However, drought stress will be referred to in several places within this text. In dealing with the different aspects of desiccation it is inevitable that certain topics will receive consideration in more than one chapter. But the authors and editors have attempted, as far as is possible, to avoid repetition of detail. Extensive cross-referencing has been used, to aid the reader in identifying where, within the special viewpoints of the treatments, similar subjects are considered. This comprehensive presentation on desiccation and survival in plants will be of value to all researchers in the field, both beginners and the more experienced, and to those with interests in basic and applied plant sciences – physiology, ecology, conservation biology, agriculture and horticulture.
M. Black H.W. Pritchard 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 1
Part I
Introduction 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 2 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 3
1 Drying Without Dying
Peter Alpert1 and Melvin J. Oliver2 1Biology Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003-5810, USA; 2Plant Stress and Water Conservation Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, 3810 4th Street, Lubbock, Texas 79415, USA
1.1. Introduction 4 1.2. Defining and Measuring Desiccation Tolerance 4 1.2.1. Operational and conceptual definitions 4 1.2.2. Measuring tolerance 6 1.3. A Brief History of Research on Desiccation Tolerance 6 1.3.1. Early work (1702–1860) on the question of whether life can stand still 6 1.3.2. The next step: establishing records 7 1.4. The Occurrence of Desiccation Tolerance in Plants: Rarity and Ubiquity 8 1.4.1. Seeds, pollen and spores 8 1.4.2. Vegetative tissues 9 1.5. The Ecology of Desiccation Tolerance in Plants: a Diversity of Cycles in Marginal Habitats 13 1.5.1. Habitats 17 1.5.2. Cycles 17 1.5.3. Hypotheses 19 1.6. Mechanisms of Desiccation Tolerance 20 1.6.1. Damage 21 1.6.1.1. Damage during desiccation 21 1.6.1.2. Damage during rehydration 22 1.6.1.3. Poikilochlorophylly 23 1.6.2. Protection 24 1.6.2.1. Proteins 24 1.6.2.2. Sugars 26 1.6.3. Repair 28 1.7. Future Prospects and Agricultural Significance 30 1.8. References 31
© CAB International 2002. Desiccation and Survival in Plants: Drying Without Dying (eds M. Black and H.W. Pritchard) 3 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 4
4 P. Alpert and M.J. Oliver
1.1. Introduction Though some desiccation-tolerant plants can survive droughts more intense and pro- Water is a universal requirement for life as longed than any that occur almost any- we know it. Water is the most abundant where on earth, tolerant plants are in the compound in all active cells, it is essential minority. Desiccation-sensitive plants dom- for metabolism and all organisms must take inate the world’s vegetation. The rarity of in water to survive. Living things therefore the apparently excellent ability to tolerate face a major problem whenever they desiccation raises a second, cautionary emerge above ground on land: the air is question about desiccation tolerance: How almost always drier than they are and takes does surviving desiccation affect plant sur- water from them. This is a life and death vival? These two questions, one largely problem for most organisms in most habi- genetic and biochemical and the other tats, because the air is at least sometimes mainly physiological and ecological, frame deadly dry. For example, when the relative the topic of desiccation and plant survival. humidity is about 50% and the tempera- The purpose of this introductory chap- ture 28°C, a plant cell that dries to equilib- ter is to summarize some of the current rium will drop to a water potential of about answers to these questions and lead into 100 MPa (Gaff, 1997). This kills over 99% the more detailed reviews of questions and of flowering plants. answers about desiccation and plant sur- Terrestrial plants appear to have vival in the chapters that follow. We begin evolved two solutions to the problem of with some terms and techniques that pro- maintaining an aqueous self in a withering vide concepts and methods for research on world. The majority solution, at least at the desiccation tolerance in plants, and a brief present evolutionary time, is never to dry summary of the surprisingly lively history out – to maintain a chronic disequilibrium of research on desiccation tolerance. We between wet cells and dry air. Some of the then give an overview of the range and most universal features of plant form, such ecology of desiccation tolerance in plants, as waxy coatings on shoots, and pores that subjects that bear on how surviving desic- can open and close on leaves, seem largely cation affects plant survival. Last, we dis- designed to conserve water. cuss mechanisms of desiccation tolerance The minority solution is to dry up but in plants, the keys to understanding how not die – to desiccate during drought and plants survive desiccation, and consider rehydrate and resume growth when the potential for breeding crops that can drought ends. About 300 species of flower- dry without dying. We will sometimes ing plants, or perhaps 0.1% of those named, abbreviate desiccation tolerance to ‘toler- are known to tolerate desiccation ance’, and we will call plants that cannot (Porembski and Barthlott, 2000). Some of tolerate desiccation ‘desiccation-sensitive’ these species can lose all of the free water or ‘sensitive’. We will consider desiccation in their cells or remain dry for up to 5 years tolerance in plants and in some organisms and still recover (Gaff, 1977). These prodi- that are not in the plant kingdom, mainly gious abilities raise the first and fundamen- cyanobacteria, algae and fungi. tal question about desiccation tolerance: How do plants survive desiccation? Most recent research on desiccation tolerance has 1.2. Defining and Measuring focused on discovering the mechanisms of Desiccation Tolerance desiccation tolerance, partly in the hopes of some day engineering tolerance in econom- 1.2.1. Operational and conceptual definitions ically important species and banishing the spectre of famine from drought. Desiccation tolerance can be operationally However, the ability to survive desicca- defined as the ability to dry to equilibrium tion may not always increase the ability of with moderately dry air and then resume plants to survive in natural systems. normal function when rehydrated, where 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 5
Drying Without Dying 5
‘moderately dry’ means 50–70% relative 2000). Some tolerant species are more dam- humidity at 20–30°C . This definition is aged by being held at intermediate water workable because there seems to be a wide contents than at full hydration or complete gap between the maximum tolerance of desiccation (Gaff, 1997), and one advantage sensitive plants and the minimum toler- of rapid desiccation may be to minimize ance of tolerant ones (Gaff, 1997). Almost time spent at intermediate levels of hydra- all species known to recover from complete tion (Kappen and Valladares, 1999; Proctor, drying at 80% relative humidity also 2000; Chapters 3 and 5). Second, cells must recover from drying at 50% (but see preserve enough cellular organization and Bochicchio et al., 1998). functional enzymes so that metabolism can The reason why a gap exists between the resume after rewetting. Preserving a skele- ranges of tolerance of drying in desiccation- tal machinery for metabolism must involve sensitive and desiccation-tolerant plants both protection and repair (Section 1.6). may be that desiccation tolerance depends Enzymes and membranes must be pro- on the ability to reversibly cease metab- tected from loss of configuration and orga- olism as cells dry out. There may not be nization, and the damage that accumulates very many marginally desiccation-tolerant from degradative non-metabolic reactions plants because, once metabolism has while plants are inactive must be repaired. stopped, it cannot be stopped further. Clegg Differences in effectiveness of protec- (1973) argued on biochemical grounds that tion may explain much of why desiccation- metabolism, defined as ‘systematically con- tolerant plants do differ in the intensity trolled pathways of enzymatic reactions’ (minimum water content or water poten- (Clegg, 2001), cannot take place at a cell tial) of desiccation that they can stand. For 1 water content of less than 0.1 g H2O g instance, tolerant angiosperms tend to sur- dry mass because not enough water vive equilibration with lower relative remains to hydrate intracellular proteins. humidities than do tolerant pteridophytes Organisms this dry do show chemical in South Africa (Gaff, 1977). Species with a activity. For instance, dried pollen can greater degree of protection of molecular incorporate water vapour into organic com- configuration and cellular organization pounds (Wilson et al., 1979). However, may survive with smaller fractions of chemical reactions, even some characteris- water. Differences in effectiveness of repair tic of living things such as oxygen uptake, may help explain why species also differ in do not necessarily require metabolism: iron the duration of desiccation (length of time rusts (Clegg, 1986). We propose that desic- in the dried state) that they can stand (e.g. cation tolerance can be conceptually Sagot and Rochefort, 1996). Those with defined as reversible cessation of metab- more effective repair mechanisms may be olism in response to water loss. better able to undo non-metabolic degrada- This suggests that the mechanisms of tion suffered while dry. desiccation tolerance must involve at least There has been some confusion about two key elements (Section 1.6). First, there the difference between ‘desiccation toler- must be an orderly shutdown of metabo- ance’ and ‘drought tolerance’. We would lism during desiccation. Different meta- like to propose that desiccation tolerance is bolic pathways must slow at compatible one form of drought tolerance. Drought rates to avoid fatal accumulations of inter- may be defined as any level of water avail- mediates and generation of free radicals. ability that is low enough to reduce plant Oxidation is a major hazard of desiccation performance. ‘Drought tolerance’ is most (e.g. Smirnoff, 1993), and the advantages of often used to refer to tolerance of water minimizing photo-oxidation may explain availabilities that are suboptimal but not why some desiccation-tolerant plants cease low enough to cause complete drying to photosynthesis at relatively high water equilibrium with the air, i.e. desiccation. contents during drying (e.g. Sherwin and Mechanisms of drought tolerance include Farrant, 1998; Tuba et al., 1998; Farrant, ways of maintaining cell water content, 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 6
6 P. Alpert and M.J. Oliver
such as osmotic regulation and stomatal undergo cycles of drying and wetting. closure, whereas desiccation tolerance con- Chapter 4 reviews the rapidly expanding sists of ways of surviving the nearly com- range of non-invasive techniques available plete loss of water. Some papers on to study the diffusion of water, the configu- intertidal algae maintain the confusion by rations and interactions of macromole- using ‘desiccation’ to refer to any amount of cules, metabolism, thermal events water loss (e.g. Leuschner et al., 1998; Bjork associated with membrane phase transi- et al., 1999). They are probably wrong, tions, ultrastructure, oxidative stress, fer- since the Oxford English Dictionary (1989) mentation and the physical properties of defines ‘to desiccate’ as ‘to make quite dry; membranes, cytoplasm and protein com- to deprive thoroughly of moisture’. plexes during desiccation and rehydration. Chapter 7 summarizes some of the techni- cal developments in infrared gas analysis 1.2.2. Measuring tolerance and fluoroscopy that have improved our capacity to quantify responses to desicca- Techniques for quantifying the degree of tion on the physiological level. desiccation tolerance in different species are reviewed in Chapters 2–4 and 7. Chapter 2 discusses the advantages and 1.3. A Brief History of Research on limitations of different measures of water Desiccation Tolerance content and techniques for distinguishing water properties in plant cells. Chapter 3 The 300-year history of the science of desic- notes how the survival and recovery rates cation tolerance began with a lengthy of seeds and vegetative tissues vary with period of discovery and doubt. In the rate of drying, light conditions during dry- course of discovering desiccation tolerance, ing, storage conditions and length of time scientists confronted the nature of life. The in the dehydrated state. In general, highly next step was to enumerate the organisms desiccation-tolerant bryophytes can sur- that tolerate desiccation and test the limits vive rapid drying but tolerant angiosperms of their tolerance. In the 1960s, researchers cannot; this seems to be related to differ- started to investigate the physiological ecol- ences in their mechanisms of tolerance ogy of desiccation tolerance in plants, espe- (Section 1.6). A few species appear insensi- cially the cycles of wetting and drying and tive to rate of drying, but most probably their effects on carbon uptake in bryophytes have an optimal rate or optimal range of and lichens. Since the 1980s, emphasis has drying rates. For instance, desiccation in shifted to the biochemistry and molecular less than 6 hours or over more than 7 days biology of desiccation tolerance. We now kills the otherwise highly tolerant pterido- know more about how plants survive desic- phyte Selaginella lepidophylla (Eickmeier, cation than about how tolerating desicca- 1983). Rates and final levels of recovery tion affects plant survival. can decrease with increasing intensity or duration of desiccation (e.g. Gaff, 1977; Alpert and Oechel, 1987; Davey, 1997). 1.3.1. Early work (1702–1860) and the Quantifying desiccation tolerance therefore question of whether life can stand still also requires techniques for imposing known rates, intensities and durations of It took scientists one and a half centuries to desiccation, and for measuring rates and establish that desiccation tolerance exists final levels of recovery (Chapter 3). Rate of (Keilin, 1959). At the end of an often ran- drying is particularly hard to standardize corous debate, the nature of life had been across species. called into question: Can life stop, be con- Investigating the mechanisms of desic- tained in a static array of molecules and cation requires techniques for measuring restart? Anthony von Leeuwenhoek was processes and states in cells as they apparently the first to glimpse desiccation 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 7
Drying Without Dying 7
tolerance, soon after he invented the micro- can be cooled to within 0.5°C of absolute scope. In 1702, he wrote to a friend (see zero, absolute zero being the temperature at Schierbeek, 1959): which all molecular motion is believed to stop, and then revive when rewarmed and The following day the sky was very hot and rehydrated (Becquerel, 1951). The discov- dry and, about nine in the morning, I took some of the sediment which has been in the ery of desiccation tolerance has shown us leaden gutter … and poured on it a small that living things can come to exist in three quantity of rain-water taken out of my stone states: alive, dead and still (Clegg, 2001). cistern … so that if there were still any living animalcules in it they might issue forth; though I confess I never thought that there 1.3.2. The next step: establishing records could be any living creatures in a substance so dried as this was. The scientific battle over whether living I was, however, mistaken; for scarce an things could dry without dying was fought hour had elapsed, when I saw at least a over animals. Starting in the 1960s, toler- hundred of the animalcules before described. ance was identified in the larvae of at least These animals were rotifers. By the mid- one insect and of some other arthropods 1800s, others had seen desiccation toler- (Hinton, 1968; Crowe et al., 1992) but has ance in two more phyla of animals, never been found in any life stage of any nematodes and tardigrades (Keilin, 1959; vertebrate or in the adults of any animals Alpert, 2000). However, others still flatly except microscopic rotifers, nematodes and denied it was possible to survive drying tardigrades. In contrast, tolerance was out. A French biologist, Felix Pouchet found to be widespread in plants. Tolerant (1859), wrote that: ‘Dry and completely bryophytes were reported by 1886, fern mummified animals cannot be resuscitated gametophytes by 1914, fern sporophytes by by hydration. Rational beliefs, observation, 1931 and angiosperms by 1921 (tables and and experiment unite to demonstrate it.’ citations in Kappen and Valladares, 1999; The Société de Biologie in Paris convened Alpert, 2000; Chapter 7). a special commission and conducted its The intensity and duration of desicca- own tests on rotifers. Its report effectively tion that plants and plant-like organisms settled the matter: ‘[organisms] reaching could survive were shown to be remark- the most complete degree of desiccation able. Like tardigrades (Doyère, 1842), cer- that can be realized … may yet retain the tain lichens, bryophytes, pteridophytes and ability to revive in water’ (Broca, 1860). angiosperms survived equilibration with However, the commission was silent on air of nearly 0% relative humidity, in
the deeper question of whether this means closed volumes over concentrated H2SO4 that life can stop and restart. As phrased by or P2O5 (e.g. Lange, 1953; Hosokawa and Pouchet’s main scientific opponent Kubota, 1957; Gaff, 1977). The liverwort (Doyère, 1842), ‘Has there been a mere Riccia macrocarpa produced new apical slowing down of the vital phenomena, … cells after 23 years of air-dryness (Breuil- or truly an absolute destruction that one Sée, 1993); the moss Grimmia laevigata could compare to death itself?’ grew when rehydrated after 10 years in a The modern consensus on this question herbarium (Keever, 1957); lichens survived seems to be that some organisms can slow 10 years of being desiccated and frozen their metabolism at least to the point at (Larson, 1988); and leaves of ferns and which it cannot be detected against the flowering plants took up neutral red dye or background of physical chemical reactions excluded Evans blue dye after 5 years of and then resume normal metabolism air-dryness (Gaff, 1977). Some desiccation- (Keilin, 1959; Hinton, 1968; Clegg, 2001). tolerant plants clearly survive longer and The most convincing evidence may be that more intense drought than ever occurs some desiccated tardigrades, rotifers, where they grow, raising the question of seeds, spores, algae, lichens and mosses what has selected for such tolerance. 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 8
8 P. Alpert and M.J. Oliver
Dessicated plants were also shown to Porembski and co-workers (e.g. Porembski tolerate other extreme stresses. Various taxa and Barthlott, 2000) are probably the clos- survived extreme cold (Becquerel, 1951; est approaches to surveys for whole plants. Pence, 2000), and some mosses survived The overall pattern one sees is taxonomic heating to 100°C (Glime and Carr, 1974; and geographic breadth contrasted with Norr, 1974). Eickmeier (1986) found that ecological narrowness. more desiccation-tolerant populations of Selaginella were also more heat-tolerant. The fungus Schizophyllum commune pro- 1.4. The Occurrence of Desiccation duced hyphae after 34 years in a vacuum of Tolerance in Plants: Rarity and Ubiquity less than 0.01 mm Hg (Bisby, 1945), show- ing long-term tolerance of both desiccation Part of the puzzle of desiccation tolerance in and lack of oxygen. Takács et al. (1999) cor- plants is that it is both very uncommon and related desiccation and UV-B tolerance in a nearly universal (Alpert, 2000). The relative set of bryophyte species. biomass of desiccation-tolerant plants in all The correlation between tolerance of des- but the most arid or frigid habitats is very iccation and tolerance of cold, heat and low, and fewer than one in a thousand anoxia has suggested that there may be species of flowering plants is known to toler- some basic properties or mechanisms that ate desiccation. At the same time, desicca- confer ‘broad-spectrum’ tolerance. Since tion-tolerant species are found on all freezing often dehydrates cells, cold and continents, in all major plant groups except desiccation stress have an obvious func- gymnosperms, and among species of all tional link. Another parallel between desic- growth forms except trees; and the great cation and cold tolerance is that both can be majority of flowering plants and also gym- ‘softened’ by periods of low stress and nosperms have desiccation-tolerant seeds or ‘hardened’ by ones of moderate stress. pollen or both. Desiccation tolerance appears Plants may lose some of their desiccation to be a universal evolutionary potential of tolerance after prolonged periods of full plant cells that has been little selected for hydration (e.g. Gaff, 1977; Schonbeck and except in resting stages of the life cycle and Bewley, 1981; Kappen and Valladares, in organisms that have not evolved effective 1999). Desiccation tolerance can vary sea- ways of avoiding desiccation. sonally (Dilks and Proctor, 1976; Gaff, 1980) Detailed reviews of the occurrence of and increase in winter (Kappen, 1964). desiccation tolerance in seeds, pollen and However, the correlation between tolerance other spores, and vegetative tissues are of desiccation and other stresses is not given in Chapters 5, 6, 7 and 8. Other recent absolute. Wood and Gaff (1989) saw no cor- reviews of the occurrence of tolerance in relation between desiccation and salinity adult plants and non-plant non-animals tolerance in species of the grass Sporobolus. include those of Kappen and Valladares As records of desiccation tolerance (1999), Alpert (2000), and Porembski and accumulated, pictures emerged of the taxo- Barthlott (2000). In this section, some of the nomic and geographic ranges of desicca- main points in these reviews will be dis- tion tolerance in plants. These pictures cussed, a few of the examples they give will remain somewhat haphazard because there be mentioned and some additional exam- have been few systematic surveys for desic- ples and points will be presented. cation tolerance within taxa or habitats. Relatively extensive lists exist for seeds (Chapter 8). A survey of all the soil algae at 1.4.1. Seeds, pollen and spores one site was published by Evans (1959). The lists of tolerant vascular plants from As in adult plants, the desiccation toler- different regions published by Gaff and co- ance of seeds can vary greatly between workers (e.g. Gaff, 1977, 1986; Gaff and species within genera, between individuals Latz, 1978) and from rock outcrops by within species and between tissues within 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 9
Drying Without Dying 9
individuals; and there is a continuum of 1.4.2. Vegetative tissues degree of tolerance across species (Chapters 5 and 8). However, whereas des- Desiccation tolerance appears common iccation tolerance is rare in adult flowering though not universal in bryophytes (e.g. plants, it is so much the rule in their seeds Richardson, 1981; Proctor, 1990), common that tolerant seeds are traditionally known in lichens (Kappen and Valladares, 1999), as ‘orthodox’ and desiccation-sensitive uncommon in pteridophytes and rare in seeds as ‘recalcitrant’. Desiccation sensitiv- angiosperms (Chapter 7). No gymnosperms ity may be a derived character in seeds, are known to tolerate desiccation (Gaff, evolved through neoteny, and is probably 1980; Chapter 7), even though gym- associated with large seeds and trees nosperms may have desiccation-tolerant (Chapter 8). Another difference between seeds or pollen (Chapters 5 and 6). desiccation tolerance in adult plants and Desiccation tolerance occurs in non-lich- seeds is that tolerance and desiccation are enized fungi, cyanobacteria and algae (Ried, environmentally induced in adults but may 1960; Mazur, 1968; Bertsch, 1970; be developmentally programmed in seeds. Schonbeck and Norton, 1978; Potts, 1994, Seeds become tolerant as part of develop- 1999; Dodds et al., 1995) but little is known ment and dry because the parent withholds about its extent. It must be very common in or withdraws water from them. Once they free-living algae and bacteria that grow on germinate, the seedlings of desiccation-sen- the surface of plants or soil, where they are sitive species with desiccation-tolerant very probably subject to desiccation. seeds lose their tolerance within hours. Different vegetative parts of a plant The obvious ecological advantage of ortho- may have different degrees of tolerance. doxy is that seeds can survive periods of There seem to be two main patterns. First, drought and disperse the offspring of a in some species only the perennating plant more widely in space and time, structures survive desiccation, such as although orthodoxy is not a prerequisite for corms in Limosella grandiflora (Gaff and dormancy (Chapter 5). Two advantages of Giess, 1986) or special dry-season organs being recalcitrant are that seeds need never in the small shrub Satureja gilliesii stop growing and may germinate more (Montenegro et al., 1979). As in plants rapidly – as in whole plants, there may be that are desiccation-sensitive but have a trade-off between desiccation tolerance desiccation-tolerant seeds, tolerance in and productivity in seeds. these species is confined to relatively Desiccation tolerance is probably also inactive plant parts. Second, leaves may the rule rather than the exception in pollen be more desiccation-tolerant when and spores, and tolerance and desiccation younger. Younger leaves are more tolerant are developmentally programmed in spores than older ones in Chamaegigas intre- as in seeds (Chapter 6). However, there are pidus (Gaff and Giess, 1986) and some at least three differences between tolerance species of Borya (Gaff, 1989). In the leaves in seeds and in spores. Tolerant pollen has of some grasses, only the basal meristem- no dormancy, it survives no more than a atic zone tolerates drying (Gaff and few months of dry storage at room tempera- Sutaryono, 1991). This suggests that some ture, and spores of some pteridophytes can tissues may lose tolerance as they differ- survive cycles of drying and wetting. entiate or age; the processes involved Desiccation-sensitive pollen is relatively could conceivably parallel those that common in species of Poaceae, cause loss of tolerance after germination Cucurbitaceae and Araceae (Chapter 6), of seeds. In all these examples of differen- and may be associated with hot, humid tial tolerance in leaves, there are con- habitats. The prevalence of desiccation tol- geners whose leaves remain tolerant as erance in seeds and spores is one reason to they mature, offering inviting systems for believe that the genetic potential to tolerate comparative studies of the ecology and desiccation exists in all plants. mechanisms of desiccation tolerance. 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 10
10 P. Alpert and M.J. Oliver
No one appears to have assessed the rel- and Valladares, 1999; Porembski and ative prevalence of desiccation tolerance in Barthlott, 2000). Desiccation-tolerant mono- different taxa of bacteria, cyanobacteria, cotyledons outnumber tolerant dicotyle- fungi and algae. Acinetobacter radioresis- dons. The monocotyledonous family tans survives 150 days at 31% relative Velloziaceae may have over 200 tolerant humidity, which helps make it a persistent species (Kubitzki, 1998). At least 39 species source of infection in hospitals (Jawad et of Poaceae tolerate desiccation (Gaff, 1997). al., 1998). At least 400 species of algae and One very small family of angiosperms, the cyanobacteria tolerate desiccation (e.g. Myrothamnaceae, is entirely desiccation- Davis, 1972; Potts, 1994, 1999; Trainor and tolerant (Porembski and Barthlott, 2000). At Gladych, 1995). Evans (1959) found that the other extreme, some species, such as many but not all of the freshwater algae in Borya nitida (Liliaceae), contain both toler- pond mud survived desiccation in the ant and sensitive individuals (Gaff, 1981). field; at least two species survived 69 days Phylogenetic analysis suggests that desicca- of desiccation in the laboratory without tion tolerance in active phases of the life forming resting stages. Two interesting phe- cycle has evolved at least eight separate nomena that have been reported from some times in vascular plants (Oliver et al., 2000). green algae but apparently not from other Desiccation-tolerant angiosperms are groups are dependence of tolerance on also widely but unevenly geographically nutrient availability (McLean, 1967, cited distributed. They occur on all continents in Chandler and Bartels, 1999) and loss of except Antarctica, but very few species are capacity to reproduce after desiccation known from Europe or North America. The (Hsu and Hsu, 1998). We know of few European species are all in two genera from reports of desiccation tolerance in non- one family (Ramondia and Haberlea in the lichenized fungi (Bisby, 1945; Gesneriaceae) (Muller et al., 1997; Drazic Zimmermann and Butin, 1973), but there is et al., 1999). The North American species an extensive literature on tolerance in include three grasses (Iturriaga et al., 2000). lichens, at least 50 species of which have The greatest concentrations of known desic- been shown to tolerate desiccation cation-tolerant angiosperms are in southern (Kappen and Valledares, 1999). Africa, western Australia and eastern South Desiccation tolerance is broadly but America (Figs 1.1 and 1.2; Gaff, 1977, 1987; unevenly distributed among taxa in plants. Gaff and Latz, 1978; Porembski and Most of the 25,000–30,000 species of Barthlott, 2000). Different taxa predominate bryophytes probably tolerate at least brief in each of these three areas. desiccation of low intensity (Chapter 7); Desiccation-tolerant plants have a wide the proportion of desiccation-tolerant range of morphological and physiological species appears to differ between orders of characteristics (Porembski and Barthlott, mosses and to be higher in mosses than in 2000). There are desiccation-tolerant annuals liverworts. There are also desiccation-toler- and perennials, graminoids and forbs, and ant hornworts (Oliver et al., 2000). herbs, shrubs and arborescent rosette plants. Porembski and Barthlott (2000) estimated Tolerant species may be caespitose, stolonif- that there are 275–325 desiccation-tolerant erous or rhizomatous. Some species are xero- species of vascular plants. At least nine fam- morphic, such as B. nitida (Gaff and ilies of pteridophytes and seven families of Churchill, 1976); others are not, such as Boea angiosperms contain desiccation-tolerant hygroscopica (Gaff, 1981). A few desiccation- sporophytes (Chapter 7). Some fern gameto- tolerant species, like C. intrepidus, have mor- phytes also tolerate desiccation (e.g. Pence, phological features typical of aquatic plants 2000). Groups of ferns and allies that seem (Gaff and Giess, 1986), and at least one to be relatively rich in desiccation-tolerant species is succulent (Barthlott and species include the family Pteridaceae and Porembski, 1996). Desiccation-tolerant the genera Cheilanthes and Selaginella angiosperms can have crassulacean acid (Gaff, 1977; Gaff and Latz, 1978; Kappen metabolism (Barthlott and Porembski, 1996; 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 11
Drying Without Dying 11 Xerophyta , (c) Xerophyta viscosa Xerophyta , (b) Craterostigma wilmsii Craterostigma (d) (b) . Each is shown in its desiccated (left) and hydrated (right) state. (Photos by J. M. Farrant.) (right) state. (Photos by in its desiccated (left) and hydrated is shown . Each Myrothamnus flabellifolius Southern Africa is a centre of diversity for desiccation-tolerant angiosperms, including (a) for desiccation-tolerant Africa is a centre of diversity Southern , and (d) (c) (a) Fig. 1.1. Fig. retinervis 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 12
12 P. Alpert and M.J. Oliver
(a)
(b) (c)
(d) (e)
Fig. 1.2. The large, isolated, granitic or gneissic outcrops known as inselbergs are a major habitat for desiccation- tolerant vascular plants in Australia, Brazil and Africa. (a) An inselberg in the Mata Atlantica of Brazil; (b) a mat of the pteridophyte Selaginella sellowii on a Brazilian inselberg; (c) an arborescent Brazilian monocot (Velloziaceae); (d) a species of Borya (Boryaceae, shown desiccated) in Australia; (e) Afrotrilepis pilosa (Cyperaceae, shown desiccated), a dominant, mat-forming species on inselbergs in West Africa. (Photos by S. Porembski.)
Markovska et al., 1997) and probably C4 pho- The wide distribution of desiccation tol- tosynthesis (Lazarides, 1992). However, no erance in plants has suggested to some plants more than 3 m tall and hence no trees authors that the basic mechanism of toler- are known to tolerate desiccation, possibly ance must be simple (Chandler and Bartels, because they cannot re-establish upward 1999). According to the ‘water replacement movement of water once the xylem cavitates hypothesis’ of Crowe et al. (1998a), the during desiccation (e.g. Sherwin et al., 1998). evolution of desiccation tolerance in all 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 13
Drying Without Dying 13
organisms depends on the selection and habitats where desiccation-sensitive plants synthesis of sufficient concentrations of do not live (Fig. 1.3). In habitats where molecular substitutes for water (Clegg, water availability and temperature are 2001). Under certain circumstances, tre- moderate and sensitive plants are abun- halose may even induce desiccation toler- dant, desiccation-tolerant vascular plants ance in human cells (Guo et al., 2000). grow mostly on outcrops of bare rock However, tolerance in plants also involves (Porembski and Barthlott, 2000). In the other mechanisms (Section 1.6), and the driest and coldest habitats, especially ecology of desiccation-tolerant plants sug- where dew and fog are major water sources, gests that the evolution of tolerance in desiccation-tolerant bryophytes, lichens, plants is constrained by its consequences algae or cyanobacteria may form the only for growth and competition. vegetation (e.g. Thompson and Iltis, 1968; Friedmann and Galun, 1974; Davey, 1997). Despite the ability of some of these species 1.5. The Ecology of Desiccation to tolerate a drought that is longer and Tolerance in Plants: a Diversity of Cycles more intense than occurs in these habitats, in Marginal Habitats the most xeric microsites are often still bare (e.g. Alpert, 1985). On rocks and soil Desiccation-tolerant plants grow mainly in in the desert, small differences in exposure the interstices and on the margins of the to the sun may determine whether a patch world’s vegetation, in microhabitats and of soil or stone is colonized or not.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Fig. 1.3. (a) Exposed surfaces of granitic boulders in the western foothills of the Cuyamaca Mountains in southern California are colonized mainly by an assemblage of desiccation-tolerant lichens and bryophytes. (b) Two of the most common mosses are Grimmia laevigata (left) and Grimmia apocarpa (right), shown hydrated. Crevices support desiccation-tolerant pteridophytes such as Pentagramma triangularis (gold-back fern), shown (c) desiccated and (d) hydrated. (Photos by P. Alpert.) 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 14
14 P. Alpert and M.J. Oliver
(a) (b)
(c)
Fig. 1.4. Desiccation-tolerant bryophytes are common even in cool, moist climates. The mosses (a) Orthotrichum anomalum, (b) Anomodon viticulosus, and (c) Tortula latifolia all occur in the UK. Each is shown in its desiccated and its rehydrated state. (Photos by M.C.F. Proctor.) These patterns appear tied to the differ- dry out again in hours. Desiccation-tolerant ent sources of water that different desicca- vascular plants are only known to rewet tion-tolerant plants can use to rehydrate, from rain; they recover in hours to days the rates at which they rewet and dry out, and dry out in days to weeks. The cumula- and their ability to recover after desicca- tive effect of repeated cycles of desiccation tion and achieve a cumulative net gain of on net photosynthesis and growth may resources. Lichens and bryophytes may explain why desiccation-tolerant plants fail rewet from dew, recover in minutes and to survive in the most exposed microsites. 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 15
Drying Without Dying 15
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig. 1.5. The most intensively studied desiccation-tolerant bryophyte is (a) Tortula ruralis, shown in the fully hydrated state (top), after slow drying (lower right), and after rehydration for 2 min (lower left). T. ruralis is common in dry habitats in North America, as shown on rocks at Mesa Verde National Park, USA (b). One of the most studied desiccation-tolerant angiosperms is the grass Sporobolus stapfianus (c), shown after drying in a pot for 14 days (left) and after subsequent immersion in water for 24 h (right). (Photos by M.J. Oliver and B. Mishler.) 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 16
16 P. Alpert and M.J. Oliver
(a) (b)
(c)
Fig. 1.6. Effects of desiccation and rehydration on ultrastructure in leaves of the moss Tortula ruralis. The transmission electron micrographs (after Bewley and Pacey, 1978) show papillose cells in (a) the fully hydrated state (note chloroplast (C) with grana stacks (g), starch grains (s), and plastoglobuli (p, labelled in (b)); a vesicle (V) and rough (RER) and smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SER); a mitochondrion (m) with prominent internal membranes or cristae; and electron-dense bodies (E); and (b) after desiccated plants had been rehydrated for 5 min (note that the chloroplasts are swollen but the nucleus (N) is not). The freeze–fracture micrograph (c) (from Platt et al., 1994) shows a portion of a cell from a slowly dried leaf (note the large, tightly appressed grana stacks (G) in the portion of the chloroplast visible and the mitochondrion (M) outside the chloroplast.) 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 17
Drying Without Dying 17
Trade-offs between tolerance and growth pensation point for photosynthesis and competition with sensitive plants may (Schipperges and Rydin, 1998). In warm explain why desiccation-tolerant plants, and cold deserts, tolerant algae and lichens though they can rise again from ‘apparent grow inside or on the underside of translu- death’ (Doyère, 1842), have not dominated cent rocks (Friedmann and Galun, 1974; the earth. Kappen, 1993; Nienow and Friedmann, 1993). Species of Nostoc, Anacystis and other cyanobacteria form desiccation- 1.5.1. Habitats tolerant crusts on bare walls and rocks from the tropics to the boreal zone (Potts, In contrast to the wide taxonomic and 1994; Lüttge, 1997). Algae, lichens and geographical ranges and the broad mor- bryophytes join cyanobacteria to form phological diversity of desiccation-tolerant crusts on desert soils, which are important vascular plants, their ecological range is in nitrogen cycling (e.g. Nash and Moser, narrowly confined to chronically or sea- 1982; Lange et al., 1994, 1997). Since sonally dry habitats or microhabitats lichens and bryophytes dry so rapidly, they where desiccation-sensitive plants are may be active mostly when conditions are sparse or absent. Porembski and Barthlott effectively mesic and function as ‘shade (2000) estimated that 90% of desiccation- plants’, even in exposed, xeric habitats tolerant vascular plants are associated (Green and Lange, 1994; Proctor, 2000). with rock outcrops, mainly in tropical to Degree of desiccation tolerance seems to lower temperate latitudes. Some species explain some of the relative ability of toler- grow on exposed rock surfaces, while oth- ant species to occupy xeric microsites or ers are associated with crevices (Nobel, habitats (e.g. Hernandez-Garcia et al., 1999; 1978; Gildner and Larson, 1992). Franks and Bergstrom, 2000). For instance, Ephemeral pools on rock outcrops in ability to tolerate desiccation (Mitchell et Africa harbour a set of aquatic, desicca- al., 1999), to maintain photosynthesis dur- tion-tolerant vascular plants (e.g. Volk, ing desiccation (Robinson et al., 2000) and 1984; Gaff and Giess, 1986). Tolerant to recover photosynthesis after repeated angiosperms and pteridophytes also grow cycles of desiccation (Davey, 1997) are in semiarid or desert grasslands, especially associated with occurrence of bryophytes (Eickmeier, 1983; Gaff, 1987; Kappen and in relatively dry sites in Antarctica. The Valladares, 1999) though not invariably ability to tolerate prolonged desiccation (Gaff and Sutaryono, 1991), on shallow and to recover quickly upon rehydration soils. There are exceptions to this narrow- appeared necessary but not sufficient to ness of ecological range. A few tolerant allow mosses to colonize highly insolated vascular species, such as Boeah hygro- surfaces on boulders in chaparral in scopica (Gaff, 1981) and Pentagramma California (Alpert, 1985; Alpert and triangularis (P. Alpert, personal obser- Oechel, 1987). A species of Selaginella vation), occur in forest understoreys. from dry habitats recovered net photosyn- Desiccation-tolerant bryophytes, lichens thesis faster than one from moister habitats and algae occupy a much wider ecological (Eickmeier, 1980). Shirazi et al. (1996) range than do tolerant vascular plants, reported differences in desiccation toler- including both less and more arid sites ance between populations of lichens from (Fig. 1.4). For example, tolerant bryophytes different habitats. and lichens are common on rocks, trunks and soil in moderately moist forests. They may be common in tundra, although the 1.5.2. Cycles Sphagnum species characteristic of tundra do not necessarily recover net photosyn- Desiccation-tolerant plants vary greatly in thesis after losing more than about 10% the rates at which they dry out, rehydrate of the water content they hold at the com- and recover upon rehydration and there- 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 18
18 P. Alpert and M.J. Oliver
fore in the rhythms of desiccation and Xerophyta scabrida began to respire within growth they experience in nature (Tuba et 20 min after rehydration, reached full rates al., 1998; Kappen and Valladares, 1999; of respiration within 6 h, began to synthe- Chapter 7). In general, bryophytes and size chlorophyll after 12 h and did not lichens dry out in hours in the sun, complete synthesis until 36 h (Tuba et al., whereas ferns and angiosperms take a day 1994). Poikilochlorophylly appears to be a or more. Minimum times to net photosyn- programmed rather than a pathological thesis after rehydration range from minutes response to desiccation. For instance, it is a in lichens and mosses rewetted with liquid necessary component of tolerance in the water, to hours in lichens and mosses rehy- leaves of some species: when these leaves drated with water vapour and in some vas- are detached before drying, they stay green cular plants rewetted with liquid, to days as they dry but they die (Gaff, 1981). in other vascular plants (Fig. 1.5; Lange, Natural cycles of wetting and drying 1969; Lange and Kilian, 1985; Gaff and have been followed for a number of Giess, 1986; Reynolds and Bewley, 1993a; mosses and lichens (e.g. Kappen et al., Scott and Oliver, 1994; Scheidegger et al., 1979; Lange et al., 1994; Sancho et al., 1997; Tuba et al., 1998). 1997) but very few desiccation-tolerant Desiccated lichens can resume net pho- vascular plants (Nobel, 1978; Gaff and tosynthesis by taking up water vapour Giess, 1986). During a year in the Negev (Hahn et al., 1993; Schroeter et al., 1994), Desert, thalli of the lichen Ramalina maci- but only if the phycobiont is a green alga formis underwent a cycle of wetting and rather than a cyanobacterium (Kappen and drying almost daily, mostly from dew Valladares, 1999). A few mosses can (Kappen et al., 1979). Some bryophytes in recover at least very slow rates of net pho- semiarid grasslands can likewise experi- tosynthesis by taking up water vapour after ence diurnal desiccation cycles driven by desiccation (Lange, 1969; Rundel and dew during dry seasons (Csintalan et al., Lange, 1980). Both bryophytes and lichens 2000). At the other extreme, some can rehydrate with dew (Lange et al., 1994; angiosperms may undergo a single period Csintalan et al., 2000). Despite the lack of a of desiccation per year, with a cycle of cuticle, differences in thallus, leaf and activity almost like that of an annual plant shoot morphology and packing produce (e.g. Gratani et al., 1998). several-fold differences in drying rates Three factors that determine how cycles between different species of bryophytes of desiccation translate into growth are and lichens (e.g. Gimingham and Smith, light damage, nutrient relations and carbon 1971; Proctor, 1982; Scott, 1982; balance. Photodamage can occur as plants Valladares, 1994); differences in morpho- dry or while they are desiccated, due at logical control of water loss may help least in part to light absorption without explain differences in ability to colonize energy transfer to photosynthesis (e.g. Seel xeric microhabitats. et al., 1992; Gauslaa and Solhaug, 1996). Desiccation-tolerant angiosperms are Desiccation-tolerant plants show a variety known to rehydrate in nature only after of mechanisms likely to reduce photodam- rain. Woody angiosperms may take longer age, including leaf curling, accumulation of to desiccate and rehydrate than herbaceous anthocyanin and carotenoids, and xantho- ones (Sherwin and Farrant, 1996; Farrant et phyll metabolism (e.g. Muslin and al., 1999). The slowest to recover from des- Homann, 1992; Eickmeier et al., 1993; iccation are the poikilochlorophyllous des- Lebkeucher and Eickmeier, 1993; iccation-tolerant plants, monocots that Calatayud et al., 1997; Deltoro et al., 1998; dismantle their photosynthetic machinery Beckett et al., 2000; Farrant, 2000). when they dry and reassemble it again Antarctic mosses, which could be subject when they rehydrate (Sherwin and Farrant, to photodamage during freezing, show 1996; Tuba et al., 1998). In one desiccation reversible photoinhibition and zeaxanthin study, the poikilochlorophyllous species activity (Lovelock et al., 1995). 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 19
Drying Without Dying 19
Little is known about the interaction These factors are most important in des- between desiccation tolerance and nutrient iccation-tolerant plants that tend to have relations. Uptake and metabolism of min- short periods of hydration or frequent eral nutrients must be interrupted from cycles of desiccation, such as lichens and some point during drying to some point mosses in arid habitats, and are probably during rehydration and recovery. In one reason why these species grow so mosses, leakage of solutes during rehydra- slowly (Stark, 1997; Kappen and tion could also reduce net nutrient uptake. Valladares, 1999; Badacsonyi et al., 2000). Increased frequency of desiccation cycles Since brief periods of hydration can result decreases potassium content but not cumu- in net carbon loss (Lange et al., 1994; lative phosphorus uptake in Tortula ruralis Csintalan et al., 2000), it is possible that (Badacsonyi et al., 2000). Activity of nitrate some desiccation-tolerant plants may have reductase decreases rapidly during desicca- been selected for traits that help prevent tion in T. ruralis (Mahan et al., 1998; rewetting by small amounts of water. Water Badacsonyi et al., 2000); activity can repellence in epilithic lichens (Bertsch, recover in less than 8 h after rehydration if 1966) and hair points on some epilithic the moss has dried slowly, but may take mosses (P. Alpert, unpublished data) could 24 h after rapid drying (Mahan et al., be examples. 1998), and may decrease during the first hour of rehydration (Marschall, 1998). However, Bates (1997) found that weekly, 1.5.3. Hypotheses 24 h desiccation did not decrease uptake of N, P or K in two mosses compared to The rarity of desiccation-tolerant vascular uptake during continuous hydration, and plants in habitats where other vascular Badacsonyi et al. (2000) saw no difference plants are abundant suggests that surviving between the effect of low water potential desiccation may have negative as well as on nitrate reductase activity in desiccation- positive effects on survival overall. One tolerant and sensitive mosses. hypothesis is that there is a trade-off Cycles of desiccation tend to reduce net between tolerance and growth, and that tol- carbon gain by favouring respiration over erant plants are out-competed by sensitive photosynthesis and by decreasing the ones where the latter can survive, because amount of time that plants are active. the latter grow faster and larger. This Desiccation increases the ratio of respira- should cause selection against tolerance in tion to photosynthesis because: (i) photo- habitats where plants can acquire and con- synthesis ceases before respiration during serve enough water to avoid desiccation. drying and resumes after respiration during An alternative possibility is that tolerance rehydration; (ii) respiration in some species is merely lost in plants that are not increases above normal levels during recov- exposed to desiccation, due to lack of ery from desiccation; and (iii) plants tend to selection pressure to maintain tolerance. stay hydrated at night when they cannot Does desiccation tolerance entail a photosynthesize but do respire, and to des- reduction in growth rate or maximum iccate most rapidly when light levels are size? There are a number of reasons to high (e.g. Alpert, 1979; Proctor, 1982; Lange suppose this, but little direct evidence. et al., 1994; Tuba et al., 1998). Tuba et al. Kappen and Valladares (1999) proposed (1999) examined the hypothesis that an that some morphological features that pro-
increase in atmospheric CO2 might improve mote tolerance also conflict with produc- carbon balance during cycles of desicca- tivity. In angiosperms, hairs or scales that
tion. Elevated CO2 does prolong photosyn- reduce water loss and can thus prolong thesis during drying in X. scabrida, but the periods of net photosynthesis also inhibit authors concluded that this aspect of global rehydration (Kappen and Valladares, change was unlikely to favour desiccation- 1999). In lichens and bryophytes, having tolerant over sensitive species. high maximum water content tends to 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 20
20 P. Alpert and M.J. Oliver
prolong hydration but inhibits photosyn- tats? This hypothesis has been partially thesis, since much of the water is typi- tested in bryophytes and lichens (e.g. cally held externally or in upper layers of Alpert, 1990; Pintado et al., 1997; Williams the lichen thallus and so slows gas diffu- and Flanagan, 1998; Kappen and sion (Green and Lange, 1994; Valladares, Valladares, 1999). For example, during a 1994; Lange et al., 1996; Tuba et al., morning after nocturnal rain or dew, 1996a; but see Sojo et al., 1997). bryophytes and lichens growing on sloped Populations of Ramalina capitata in dry, surfaces in north temperate latitudes tend bright sites tend to have greater capacity to dry more rapidly if they are on surfaces to store water and slower gas diffusion that face south or east than if they are on than populations in more shaded sites surfaces that face north or west (Kappen et (Pintado et al., 1997), suggesting that al., 1980; Alpert and Oechel, 1985). Those selection favours water storage more when on north- and west-facing surfaces are light is less limiting. Proctor (2000) pro- more likely to recoup the respiratory losses posed that bryophytes have been selected incurred during the night before desicca- for rapid desiccation to minimize time tion arrests photosynthesis in the morning. spent at intermediate water contents, This probably at least partly explains why which most dispose plants to damage. mosses are ‘more common on the north side Rapid desiccation would also reduce time of the tree’. There appear to be no studies available for photosynthesis and growth. on the effect of microsite on carbon balance Cellular mechanisms of tolerance such as in desiccation-tolerant vascular plants. sugar and protein synthesis (Section 1.6) Oliver et al. (2000) hypothesized that seem likely to impose metabolic costs and desiccation tolerance was once the major- thus reduce growth. If cavitation during ity solution to the problem of living in dry desiccation precludes desiccation-tolerant air. They suggested that tolerance is a prim- plants from exceeding 3 m in height itive characteristic in green plants that (Sherwin and Farrant, 1998), then they allowed them to colonize the land. Once will be overtopped wherever trees can plants evolved vascular tissues and effi- grow. Some comparative studies on cient internal water transport, they lost mosses (Bates, 1997; Arscott et al., 2000) their tolerance of desiccation except in and anecdotal reports on grasses (Gaff, parts that had to be cut off from water 1989) have found that more productive transport – their spores, seeds and pollen. species are less desiccation-tolerant. The Tolerance in adult plants then re-evolved long-standing hypothesis (Grime, 1979) several times in different lineages. that stress tolerance conflicts with pro- Porembski and Barthlott (2000) proposed ductivity is intuitively appealing but that this re-evolution occurred as mechanically elusive. Further compara- angiosperms colonized the bare rock out- tive studies on desiccation-tolerant plants crops where their desiccation-tolerant could help reveal mechanisms that dictate species are now most diverse. If this sce- trade-offs between tolerance and growth. nario is correct, then desiccation tolerance The absence of desiccation-tolerant in plants has evolved not just as a way of plants in some highly xeric habitats where surviving in marginal habitats, but as a way no other plants occur suggests that surviv- of colonizing frontiers, first from water on ing desiccation may not assure survival, to land and then from soil on to stone. even where competition is not a factor. One hypothesis to explain why tolerant plants are not more abundant in barren habitats is 1.6. Mechanisms of Desiccation that the plants cannot maintain a cumula- Tolerance tive positive carbon balance under certain regimes of water availability (Ried, 1960). Until the mid-1970s, it was generally Does carbon balance limit the survival of believed that the mechanisms of desicca- desiccation-tolerant plants in xeric habi- tion tolerance in plants were mechanical 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 21
Drying Without Dying 21
(see reviews by Bewley, 1979; Oliver and 1.6.1. Damage Bewley, 1984). Structural features such as flexible cell walls, small vacuoles and Before discussing what is known of the lack of plasmodesmata were suggested as cellular protection and repair mecha- key elements in tolerance (Gaff, 1980; nisms of desiccation tolerance, it is worth Bewley and Krochko, 1982; Oliver and reviewing the effects of desiccation and Bewley, 1984). In a landmark paper, rehydration on cellular integrity in desic- Bewley (1979) articulated the alternative cation-tolerant plants. The critical ques- view that desiccation tolerance is primar- tion, when deciding what type of ily protoplasmic in nature. This theory mechanisms desiccation-tolerant plants argues that certain plants and plant tis- employ, is when might damage occur? Is sues achieve desiccation tolerance as a it during the drying process or upon rehy- result of the inherent properties of their dration? For instance, if damage does not cellular contents (protoplasm). Most evi- actually occur during desiccation, then dence now supports this view, though there is good reason to believe that pro- structural features are clearly important tective mechanisms are in place. If dam- in desiccation tolerance in some cases age occurs upon rehydration, and the cell (Sherwin and Farrant, 1996; Farrant et subsequently recovers, repair mecha- al., 1999). nisms are probably operative. In addition, Bewley (1979) further defined three the amount of damage and the rate at critical features of desiccation tolerance which cells return to a normal status based on the observation that many desic- measure the effectiveness of protective cation-tolerant plants exhibit cellular and repair processes and the overall level changes, some of which can be described of desiccation tolerance. as extensive damage, during and follow- ing desiccation. The plant or tissue must: 1.6.1.1. Damage during desiccation (i) limit damage to a repairable level; (ii) maintain its physiological integrity in the The timing of damage is still controversial, dried state (perhaps for extended periods but a consensus is building that little dam- of time); and (iii) mobilize mechanisms age occurs during drying in desiccation- upon rehydration that repair damage suf- tolerant tissues. Much of the work in this fered during desiccation and rehydration. area has focused on the plasma membrane. These criteria laid the experimental foun- All desiccation-tolerant tissues leak dation for the field from the 1980s solutes during rehydration (Simon, 1978; onwards and continue to influence the Bewley, 1979; Bewley and Krochko, 1982), way we think about how plants survive indicating that the cell membrane has been desiccation. In particular, it is now compromised. Early electron microscopy widely accepted that the cells of desicca- of seeds (Webster and Leopold, 1977; tion-tolerant plants employ mechanisms Morrison-Baird et al., 1979) and bryophyte that protect them from the rigours of tissues (reviewed by Oliver and Bewley, extensive water loss and also mecha- 1984) suggested that membranes in dried nisms, at least in the case of vegetative plant cells were completely disorganized. cells, that repair damage suffered during With the advent of more sophisticated desiccation or rehydration (Bewley and technologies, these observations were Oliver, 1992). This introductory overview determined to be artefacts of sample of the mechanisms of desiccation toler- preparation and chemical fixation (Bewley, ance will therefore concentrate on cellu- 1979; Thompson, 1979; Bewley and lar features (the so-called ‘inherent Krochko, 1982; Oliver and Bewley, 1984). properties’ of desiccation-tolerant cells) The use of non-aqueous fixatives elimi- that have been suggested to play a major nated some of these artefacts but the heavy role in protection and repair. Details are use of chemical treatments still made covered in subsequent chapters. interpretation difficult (Thompson, 1979; 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 22
22 P. Alpert and M.J. Oliver
Öpik 1980, 1985; Tiwari et al., 1990; 1.6.1.2. Damage during rehydration Smith, 1991). Freeze–fracture electron microscopy, however, has yielded the most As noted above, all plant tissues leak reliable data. Dried tissues are eminently solutes when rehydrated following a dry- suited for freeze–fracture preparation ing event. In desiccation-tolerant tissues, because their low water content virtually however, this is a transient event (Simon, eliminates the formation of ice crystals, 1978; Bewley, 1979; Bewley and Krochko, which make high-quality replicas difficult 1982). Several hypotheses have been to obtain. Freeze–fracture studies clearly offered to explain imbibitional (or rehydra- demonstrated that the membranes of seeds tive) leakage (Simon, 1974; Senaratna and (Thompson and Platt-Aloia, 1982; Bliss et McKersie, 1983a,b; Crowe et al., 1989, al., 1984) and pollen (Platt-Aloia et al., 1992; Hoekstra et al., 1992). The prevailing 1986) could retain normal bilayer organi- hypothesis is that imbibitional leakage is zation and dispersal patterns of intramem- the result of lipid-phase transitions occur- branous particles at water contents as low ring in the plasma membrane as a result of 1 dehydration and rehydration (Crowe et al., as 0.08 g H2O g dry mass. The plasma and organelle membranes of vegetative 1992). During drying, membranes pass cells of the desiccation-tolerant pterido- from the liquid crystalline to the gel phase, phyte Selaginella lepidophylla and the and they return to the liquid crystalline moss Tortula ruralis also retain normal phase during rehydration. In artificial organization and dispersal patterns in the membranes, this transition can lead to a dried state (Platt et al., 1994; Fig. 1.6). transient leakage event (Hammoudah et al., The effects of desiccation on cellular 1981), and, since phase transitions have components that cannot be observed by been demonstrated in drying and rehydrat- freeze–fracture microscopy are more diffi- ing desiccation-tolerant cells (Crowe et al., cult to evaluate, largely due to the likeli- 1989; Hoekstra et al., 1992), it has been hood of partial rehydration and the generally accepted that phase transition is production of artefacts during chemical the basis of imbibitional leakage in most fixation. In seeds, the uncertainty is com- desiccation-tolerant tissues. In seeds, how- pounded by the fact that the tissues ever, it is thought that membrane-phase are part of a developing system. changes do not occur because of the pres- Nevertheless, observations tend to sug- ence of a seed coat, which impedes the gest that desiccation of tolerant plants passage of water to the dried cells. generates an ordered ‘collapse’ of the Hoekstra et al. (1999) suggested that the cellular milieu that results in little ultra- slow rate of penetration of water may set structural damage (Oliver and Bewley, up a ‘pre-hydration’ state where the mem- 1984; Gaff, 1989; Goldsworthy and branes are in a liquid crystalline state Drennan, 1991; Sherwin and Farrant, before liquid water surrounds the rehydrat- 1996; Farrant et al., 1999). If desiccation- ing cells. Since leakage does occur during tolerant plants successfully avoid damage the rehydration of these tissues (Hoekstra during the dehydration process, as it et al., 1992; Tetteroo et al., 1996), it has appears they do, is there any consequence been concluded that leakage must occur at all of desiccation in these plants? The through an intact lipid bilayer, as suggested answer appears to be yes. All desiccation- by Senaratna and McKersie (1983b). tolerant plants and plant tissues show Recently, a new hypothesis has emerged signs of cellular damage when the dried from some exciting new studies on dehy- tissue is rehydrated. It is, however, debat- drating and rehydrating pollen (Hoekstra et able whether or not the damage occurs al., 1997, 1999; Golovina et al., 1998; during the drying process (but is not Buitink et al., 2000; Chapter 10). This body of observable at an ultrastructural level) or work using amphiphilic spin probes demon- as the result of the inrush of water into strates that during dehydration endogenous the cells during rehydration. amphiphilic substances partition from the 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 23
Drying Without Dying 23
aqueous cytoplasm into pollen membranes. Within minutes after rehydration, the Using data obtained from liposome-based ex- chloroplasts of the green gametophytic tis- periments, Golovina et al. (1998) suggested sues of desiccation-tolerant bryophytes that it is the presence of these amphiphiles appear swollen and globular. Their outer in the membrane that causes imbibitional membranes are folded and separated from leakage and that as the pollen rehydrates the the thylakoids, which are no longer com- amphiphilic substances move out of the pacted (Oliver and Bewley, 1984). The membranes and leakage stops. This hypo- extent of thylakoid disruption increases thesis could explain how transient leakage with the rate of prior desiccation. The can occur through an intact membrane. In a chloroplasts of desiccation-tolerant more recent study, Buitink et al. (2000) angiosperms tend to be more resistant to demonstrated that the movement of disruption than those of bryophytes, amphiphilic compounds into membranes although vesicularization within the also occurs in imbibing radicles of peas and chloroplast internal membranes is common cucumbers. This study, using electron para- (Gaff and Hallam, 1974; Gaff et al., 1976; magnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy and Sherwin and Farrant, 1996). In all desicca- inserted nitroxide spin probes, demon- tion-tolerant plants, mitochondria swell strated a difference in partitioning behav- and exhibit disruption of the cristae iour between desiccation-tolerant and (reviewed by Bewley and Krochko, 1982). sensitive tissues. Spin probes partitioned Swelling and disruption of mitochondria into the membranes at higher water content are not affected by rate of desiccation. In in desiccation-sensitive tissues than in toler- all cases, organelles regain normal struc- ant tissues. These authors suggest, from in ture within 24 h. vitro portioning experiments, that it is the microviscosity of the cytoplasm that con- 1.6.1.3. Poikilochlorophylly trols portioning of amphiphilic compounds into the plasma membrane. What remains to At least eight genera of desiccation-tolerant be determined is the role of the native monocots are ‘poikilochlorophyllous’, i.e. amphiphilic compounds in membrane dam- they reversibly lose their chlorophyll and age and, if they are important in desiccation dismantle their chloroplasts during desic- tolerance, the role they play in the long-term cation (Gaff, 1989; Tuba et al., 1998). The stability of membranes in the dried state. thylakoid system within desiccated chloro- Golovina et al. (1998) speculated that plasts is completely replaced by small amphiphiles may have antioxidant proper- groups of plastoglobuli and by osmophilic, ties that protect membranes from damage stretched lipid material, which appears to by free radicals generated during desicca- occupy the positions previously occupied tion and rehydration. If so, imbibitional by the thylakoids (Hallam and Luff, 1980; leakage may be a necessary trade-off for Tuba et al., 1993a,b; Sherwin and Farrant, protection. Much work will be required 1996). After 10–12 h rehydration, when before the importance of native full turgor and maximum leaf water con- amphiphilic compounds in desiccation tol- tent are reached, synthesis of chlorophylls erance can be determined, but amphiphiles and carotenoids and the reassembly of thy- are an intriguing new development in our lakoids begin. Early in reassembly, sets of understanding of desiccation tolerance. two primary thylakoids stack to form Rehydration-induced damage other than grana. Within 72 h the chloroplasts appear leakage is difficult to distinguish from nor- normal and full photosynthetic capacity is mal development in seeds and pollen but restored (Tuba et al., 1993b, 1994). From is clearly evident in the tissues of most these studies and later physiological in- desiccation-tolerant vegetative tissues, vestigations (Tuba et al., 1997), it appears especially in organelles (reviewed by Bewley that these changes can be classified as and Krochko, 1982; Oliver and Bewley, genetically programmed responses to des- 1984; Gaff, 1989; Oliver and Wood, 1997). iccation rather than damage. 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 24
24 P. Alpert and M.J. Oliver
1.6.2. Protection reach a maximum about three days before the seed begins to desiccate (Galau and Much of what we know of the cellular pro- Hughes, 1987; Galau et al., 1987). The tection mechanisms involved in desiccation other class contains 12 transcripts, which tolerance in plants comes from studies of appear late in maturation and achieve max- orthodox seeds (Bewley and Black, 1994; imum expression just before and during Chapter 5) and, to a slightly lesser extent, desiccation. LEA proteins make up 30% of pollen (Crowe et al., 1992; Hoekstra et al., the non-storage protein and 2% of the total 1992). The ability of seeds to withstand soluble protein in the mature cotton desiccation is acquired during their devel- embryos and are uniformly localized opment. This acquisition is usually sub- throughout the cytoplasm (Roberts et al., stantially earlier than the culmination of 1993). LEA proteins and the acquisition of the drying event itself, which is the termi- desiccation tolerance during seed matura- nal event in orthodox seed maturation. tion have been linked in other dicots (e.g. Seeds of some species can withstand pre- soybean: Blackman et al., 1995) and in mature desiccation well before the mid- monocots (e.g. maize: Mao et al., 1995; point of their development (Bewley and Wolkers et al., 1998). Black, 1994; Chapter 5). Among the meta- A set of LEA proteins arises in develop- bolic changes that take place just prior to or ing barley and maize embryos at the time during drying is the synthesis of proteins that tolerance of desiccation is acquired. A and sugars, which have long been postu- small subset of these proteins is induced lated to form the basis of a series of overlap- when barley embryos at the intolerant stage ping protective mechanisms that limit are cultured in abscisic acid (ABA) (Bartels damage to cellular constituents (Bewley, et al., 1988; Bochicchio et al., 1991), and a 1979; Leprince et al., 1993; Oliver and causal relationship between ABA and lea Bewley, 1997). These two components have gene expression has been suggested. since been widely implicated as being criti- Evidence for, and against, this relationship cal for desiccation tolerance in all plant exists in the literature. In cotton embryos, cells including vegetative cells (Ingram and high expression of the first class of lea Bartels, 1996; Oliver and Bewley, 1997; genes occurs as ABA content increases. Scott, 2000). Over the years it has also High expression of the second set of lea become clear that the synthesis of antioxi- genes, however, occurs at the start of, and dants and enzymes involved in oxidative during, maturation drying, when the metabolism also play a critical role in cellu- endogenous ABA content is low. There are lar protection and desiccation tolerance explanations for this lack of correlation, (Chapter 10). However, this aspect of pro- e.g. there is an early-regulated, ABA-con- tection will not be addressed here. trolled mechanism, which operates only later when drying commences. On the other hand, an ABA-independent pathway 1.6.2.1. Proteins may be involved in the synthesis of the Only one subset of proteins that accumu- second group of LEA proteins. late at the time of the acquisition of desic- LEA proteins have been identified in the cation tolerance has been extensively vegetative tissues of all desiccation-tolerant investigated, the late embryogenesis abun- plants studied so far (Ingram and Bartels, dant (LEA) proteins, first described in cot- 1996; Oliver and Bewley, 1997; Blomstedt ton (Galau and Hughes, 1987; Galau et al., et al., 1998) and proteins related to some of 1987, 1991; Chapter 5). The genes that the LEA proteins, e.g. dehydrins (see encode LEA proteins in developing cotton- below), have been associated with the seeds are comprised of two distinct classes response of non-tolerant plants to water whose regulation is coordinated. One class stress (Skriver and Mundy, 1990; Bray, contains six different lea transcripts, which 1997). In nearly all instances, the induction appear relatively early in development and of LEA protein synthesis in vegetative tis- 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 25
Drying Without Dying 25
sues can be elicited by exogenous ABA LEA protein synthesis is also highly application (Ingram and Bartels, 1996; induced in the vegetative tissues of desic- Campalans et al., 1999). cation-tolerant angiosperms during drying LEA proteins fall into five groups by (Bartels et al., 1993; Blomstedt et al., 1998; virtue of sequence similarities (Dure et al., Bartels, 1999). Callus derived from vegeta- 1989; Ingram and Bartels, 1996; Cuming, tive tissue of the desiccation-tolerant plant 1999). All are highly hydrophilic and all are Craterostigma plantagineum is not inher- very stable, as evidenced by their resistance ently tolerant but can be made so by the to the denaturing effects of boiling (with the application of ABA (Bartels et al., 1990). exception of Group 5 LEA proteins). Group The application of ABA to this tissue 1 LEA proteins are characterized by a 20- results in the synthesis of novel proteins, amino acid motif and are represented by the some of which are LEA proteins including wheat Em protein, the first LEA protein the Group 2 LEA proteins, the dehydrins identified (Cuming and Lane, 1979). Group (Bartels et al., 1993). The desiccation-toler- 2 LEA proteins are characterized by a 15- ant moss T. ruralis utilizes a more primi- amino acid motif, the K-segment, a stretch tive mechanism of desiccation tolerance of serine residues and a conserved motif (Oliver et al., 2000), which involves a con- near the N-terminus of the protein (Close, stitutive cellular protection strategy, and in 1997). This group of proteins is also called this plant, unlike others, dehydrins are not the dehydrins and these are the most wide- induced by dehydration or by ABA but are spread and most studied of the LEA pro- constitutively expressed (Bewley et al., teins. Group 3 LEA proteins share a 1993). Dessication-sensitive species characteristic 11-amino acid repeat motif exposed to sub-lethal dehydration stress (Dure et al., 1989), which is predicted to also respond by synthesizing LEA proteins form an amphipathic -helix. These amphi- and LEA-like proteins, in particular dehy- pathic helices are postulated to form intra- drins (Close, 1997). These examples and and intermolecular interactions that may many more all point to the importance of have important consequences for their func- LEA proteins in dehydration responses and tion (Baker et al., 1988; Dure, 1993a). The desiccation tolerance. least studied of the LEA proteins are those in The most convincing pieces of evidence Groups 4 and 5, which are somewhat to suggest that LEA proteins have an atypical (Dure, 1993b; Galau et al., 1993). important role in cellular protection come Group 5 LEA proteins are more hydrophobic from transgenic studies using a barley than other LEA proteins and are not resistant Group 3 lea gene, HVA1. This gene, when to high temperature. Most of the LEA protein expressed in a constitutive fashion in groups have been identified in many differ- transgenic rice, increased its tolerance to ent plants. All groups are thought to play a water and salt stress (Xu et al., 1996). role in desiccation tolerance, and the evi- HVA1 overexpression in wheat, driven by a dence for this viewpoint is growing. maize ubiquitin promoter, resulted in The evidence for the involvement of transgenic lines that performed in a supe- LEA proteins in desiccation tolerance is rior fashion under soil-water deficits circumstantial but compelling. LEA protein (Sivamani et al., 2000). synthesis in seeds, as mentioned above, is There are a variety of suggested mecha- associated with both the acquisition of des- nisms by which LEA proteins might pro- iccation tolerance and the final stage of tect cellular components. Many LEA seed maturation just prior to desiccation. proteins have extensive regions of random In addition, ABA-deficient (aba) and ABA- coiling, which has been postulated to pro- insensitive (abi3) double-mutants of mote the binding of water, helping to main- Arabidopsis seeds do not dry on the parent tain a minimum water requirement (Ingram plant, do not tolerate desiccation and lack and Bartels, 1996). For instance, the Em several LEA proteins (Koorneef et al., 1989; protein of wheat is considerably more Meurs et al., 1992). hydrated than most common proteins, and 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 26
26 P. Alpert and M.J. Oliver
over 70% of the Em protein is configured in accumulation during desiccation. as random coils (McCubbin et al., 1985). Constitutive expression of HSPs is unusual Baker et al. (1988) suggested that the ran- in vegetative tissues and resembles the dom coil nature of some LEA proteins may expression pattern of these proteins in allow them to conform to the shape of cel- seeds. In addition, exogenous ABA lular constituents and thus, by virtue of induced both the expression of HSPs and their hydroxyl groups, help to maintain the acquisition of desiccation tolerance in their solvation state when water is C. plantagineum callus tissues (Alamillo et removed. These authors also suggested that al., 1995). Finally, a LEA-like HSP, HSP-12, the Group 2 LEA proteins (dehydrins), by from yeast was shown to be capable of pro- virtue of their amphipathic helical repeats, tecting liposomal membranes from the provide surfaces when bundled together damaging effects of desiccation in a way that would sequester ions. This may be similar to that seen with the sugar tre- crucial as the increasing ionic strength dur- halose (Sales et al., 2000). Thus it appears ing drying could cause irreversible damage that small HSPs may also play a role in cel- to cellular proteins and structural compo- lular protection during desiccation: per- nents. Recently, Velten and Oliver (2001) haps this capability is related to their described an LEA-like protein from T. chaperonin-like activities, which may help ruralis that contains 15 15-amino-acid maintain protein structure under denatur- repeats predicted to form amphipathic ing conditions. Other proteins whose tran- helices. This protein appears to be synthe- scripts accumulate during the dehydration sized during the rehydration event and phases of vegetative desiccation-tolerant may serve to trap valuable ions that would angiosperms have been identified but little otherwise be lost. Studies using individual has been done to confirm their roles in des- LEA proteins in in vitro assays also add to iccation tolerance (Kuang et al., 1995; the possible mechanisms by which these Ingram and Bartels, 1996; Blomstedt et al., proteins exert protection of cellular compo- 1998; Bockel et al., 1998; Neale et al., nents. Wolkers (1998) suggested from data 2000). See Chapters 5 and 11 for further obtained from the study of a pollen Group discussion of all these proteins. 3 LEA protein and its effect on sucrose glass formation that LEA proteins may act 1.6.2.2. Sugars as anchors in a structural network that sta- bilizes cytoplasmic components during The accumulation of soluble sugars is also drying and in the dried state. strongly correlated to the acquisition of At this point it seems likely that each desiccation tolerance in plants and other individual group of LEA proteins may have organisms (for reviews see Crowe et al., different, complementary effects. Most des- 1992; Leprince et al., 1993; Vertucci and iccation-tolerant tissues contain a represen- Farrant, 1995; Chapters 5 and 10). Soluble tative of most, if not all, of the different sugars, especially sucrose, accumulate in groups of LEA proteins, and it is also likely seeds (Leprince et al., 1993), pollen that all are needed to achieve the highest (Hoekstra et al., 1992) and in desiccation- degree of desiccation tolerance. tolerant vegetative tissues (Bewley and There is mounting evidence that another Krochko, 1982; Ingram and Bartels, 1996; class of proteins, the small heat-shock pro- Oliver and Bewley, 1997). In Craterostigma teins (HSPs), may play a role in cellular plantagineum, 2-octulose stored in the protection during desiccation. Small HSPs hydrated leaves is converted to sucrose accumulate in maturing seeds of many during drying to such an extent that in the plant species (Vierling, 1991; Wehmeyer et dried state it comprises about 40% of the al., 1996) prior to desiccation. Alamillo et dry weight (Bianchi et al., 1991). al. (1995) reported that small HSPs are Sucrose is the only free sugar available expressed constitutively in the vegetative for cellular protection in desiccation-toler- tissues of C. plantagineum and increased ant mosses, including Tortula ruraliformis 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 27
Drying Without Dying 27
and T. ruralis (Bewley et al., 1978; Cytoplasmic glass formation has also Smirnoff, 1992). The amount of this sugar been postulated to maintain the structural in gametophytic cells of T. ruralis is and functional integrity of macromolecules approximately 10% of dry mass, which is (Sun and Leopold, 1997; Crowe et al., sufficient to offer membrane protection 1998b), which has been well demonstrated during drying, at least in vitro (Strauss and with in vitro models (Roos, 1995). Hauser, 1986). Moreover, neither drying Intracellular glasses, by virtue of their high nor rehydration in the dark or light results viscosity, drastically reduce molecular in a change in sucrose concentration, sug- movement and impede diffusion of reac- gesting that it is important for cells to tive compounds in the cell. It is by this maintain sufficient amounts of this sugar property that glasses are thought to prolong (Bewley et al., 1978). The lack of an the longevity of desiccated tissues by slow- increase in soluble sugars during drying ing down degradative processes during appears to be a common feature of desicca- storage. Buitink et al. (1998) recently tion-tolerant mosses (Smirnoff, 1992). demonstrated a strong relationship It is thought that sugars protect the cells between molecular mobility and storage during desiccation by two mechanisms. longevity in both pollen and pea seeds. First, the hydroxyl groups of sugars may Thus, although glass formation may not be substitute for water to maintain important in the initial acquisition of des- hydrophilic interactions in membranes and iccation tolerance, it may be crucial for sur- proteins during dehydration (Crowe et al., vival of the dried state (as suggested by 1992). This has so far only been demon- Buitink, 2000; Chapter 10). strated in vivo, using liposomes and iso- Other carbohydrates besides sucrose lated proteins (Crowe et al., 1992). accumulate in desiccation-tolerant tissues, Secondly, sugars are a major contributing the principal ones being the oligosaccha- factor to vitrification, the formation of a rides stachyose and raffinose (Horbowicz biological glass, of the cytoplasm of dry and Obendorf, 1994), and have been postu- cells (Leopold et al., 1994; Chapter 10). lated to play a part in desiccation toler- This mechanism has been the subject of ance. The presence of these compounds intense research over the last 15 years. has also been correlated with seed Vertucci and Leopold (1986) suggested longevity (Hoekstra et al., 1994; that desiccation tolerance in seeds had to Horbowicz and Obendorf, 1994), which be associated with some feature or solute has linked them to a possible role in the combination that would avoid crystalliza- stabilization of intracellular glasses tion of the cytoplasm as dehydration pro- (Leopold et al., 1994; Bernal-Lugo and gressed. Burke (1986) proposed that high Leopold, 1995; Sun, 1997). However, concentrations of sugars lead to vitrification Buitink et al. (2000) demonstrated that the of the cytoplasm during desiccation and reduction in oligosaccharides in primed
thus prevent crystallization. Glass forma- seeds did not alter Tg (the glass-to-liquid tion has since been demonstrated in seeds transition temperature) or viscosity and (Williams and Leopold, 1989; Leopold et thus they contended that oligosaccharides al., 1994; Leprince and Walters-Vertucci, do not affect the stability of intracellular 1995), pollen (Buitink et al., 1996) and in glasses. These results support the earlier leaf tissues of C. plantagineum (Wolkers et studies of Black et al. (1999), which had al., 1998). Walters (1998) went as far as to shown a lack of a temporal correlation say that glass formation is an intrinsic prop- between the induction of desiccation toler- erty of any complex system that can survive ance by a mild dehydration treatment and desiccation. However, glass formation may the appearance of raffinose in wheat not be sufficient to confer desiccation toler- embryos. These studies cast doubt on the ance since desiccation-sensitive tissues are role of oligosaccharides in the acquisition capable of forming cytoplasmic glasses of tolerance and the maintenance of viabil- (Sun et al., 1994; Buitink et al., 1996). ity in the dried state. 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 28
28 P. Alpert and M.J. Oliver
1.6.3. Repair In the desiccation-tolerant fern Polypodium virginianum rehydrating tis- The repair processes associated with des- sues do accumulate novel transcripts but iccation tolerance have been difficult to their identities have not been investigated detail and characterize. In seeds, repair (Reynolds and Bewley, 1993b). Recent mechanisms are difficult to separate from work with the desiccation-tolerant grass events that are associated with germina- Sporobolus stapfianus has identified two tion and early seedling growth, but evi- transcripts that accumulate during the dence for repair does exist. In vegetative early phases of dehydration but also accu- angiosperms, the major emphasis appears mulate during rehydration. The first of to be on effective cellular protection and these is a transcript coding for a plant much of the research in angiosperms has Rab2, a small GTP-binding protein that in focused on this component. The most other systems is an important protein in promising models for investigating a direct the targeting of membrane vesicles in role for cellular repair in desiccation toler- vesicular trafficking pathways and a path- ance appear to be the highly desiccation- way directly involved in membrane con- tolerant bryophytes. struction (O’Mahony and Oliver, 1999a). In seeds, most of the evidence for cellu- The second transcript encoded a polyubi- lar repair derives from investigations into quitin, a protein involved in protein the causal relationship between cellular turnover (O’Mahony and Oliver, 1999b). In damage and loss of viability during storage C. plantagineum very few transcripts were (Bewley and Black, 1994). Consequently, identified as being specific for the rehydra- one has to keep in mind that the repair tion process. Those that were appeared to processes that have been identified may be involved in the metabolism of sugars not play a major role in desiccation toler- that is required to re-establish the pools of ance per se but rather in the ability to sur- octulose required for the generation of vive long term in the dried state. There are sucrose during dehydration (Bernacchia et two reports, however, that indicate the al., 1996). repair of cellular components, proteins and Cellular repair, as a component of desic- DNA, which may directly affect desicca- cation tolerance mechanisms, is more easily tion tolerance as well as storage longevity. defined in desiccation-tolerant bryophytes. Mudgett et al. (1997) demonstrated that Desiccation-tolerant bryophytes are thought proteins containing abnormal L-isoaspartyl to employ a mechanism for desiccation tol- residues could be repaired in aged barley erance that represents the most primitive seeds by the activity of the enzyme L-isoas- form expressed in land plants (Oliver et al., partyl methyltransferase. These authors 2000). Unlike the acquisition of desiccation argue that this type of repair is particularly tolerance in seeds, which may be develop- important during dehydration where pro- mentally programmed, and in desiccation- tein turnover rates are slow. Boubriak et al. tolerant angiosperms, which is (1997) demonstrated that one of the earliest environmentally induced by drying, desic- activities seen in imbibing cereal grains is cation tolerance in most bryophytes the repair of damage to genomic DNA appears to be constitutive (Oliver and incurred whilst the seeds were dry and in Bewley, 1997). The difference in mecha- storage. If the repair processes were nisms of tolerance in these systems is blocked during imbibition then DNA reflected in their biology. Desiccation-toler- degradation became severe. If universal, ant angiosperms have morphological and DNA repair would certainly qualify as a physiological adaptations in place that can key process in the mechanism of desicca- retard the loss of water. The mechanism of tion tolerance in seeds (Chapter 12). desiccation tolerance that has evolved in The identification of repair processes in these plants takes advantage of these adap- vegetative tissues of desiccation-tolerant tations by being inducible. As the rate of tracheophytes has received little attention. water loss is relatively slow, there is time 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 29
Drying Without Dying 29
to establish the protective measures bolism when rehydrated. During the first 2 required, and the plant can thus survive a h following rehydration of dried T. ruralis, drying event. If water loss is too rapid, the synthesis of 25 proteins (termed these plants succumb to the damaging hydrins) is terminated or substantially effect of water loss and die (Gaff, 1989; decreased, and the synthesis of 74 proteins Bewley and Oliver, 1992; Oliver and (termed rehydrins) is initiated or substan- Bewley, 1997). Bryophytes, on the other tially increased (Oliver, 1991). Controls hand, have little in the way of adaptations over changes in synthesis of these two to retain water within the plant and, as a groups of proteins are not mechanistically result, the internal water content of these linked. It takes a certain amount of prior plants rapidly equilibrates to the water water loss to fully activate the synthesis of potential of the environment (Proctor et al., rehydrins upon rehydration. Perhaps this 1998). A consequence of this is that many is a strategy that has evolved to link the bryophytes experience drying rates that are amount of energy expended in repair to extreme and therefore have insufficient the amount of damage potentiated by dif- time to induce and set in place protective fering degrees of drying. measures. Thus, it appears that bryophytes In T. ruralis, there also appears the have evolved a constitutive mechanism for capability of preparing the cell for a rapid desiccation tolerance, one that has protec- recovery if drying rates are sufficiently tive measures that are always in place. This slow (4–6 h). Using cDNA clones corre- conclusion is supported by the observa- sponding to T. ruralis transcripts that are tions that both sucrose and LEA proteins preferentially translated during rehydra- are maintained at constant levels in desic- tion (Scott and Oliver, 1994), it was deter- cation-tolerant bryophytes during drying mined that several ‘recovery’ transcripts and rehydration (see above). The constitu- accumulate during slow drying (Oliver tive protection mechanism appears to be and Wood, 1997; Wood and Oliver, 1999). particularly effective in preventing damage Recent studies clearly demonstrate that to the photosynthetic apparatus, as evi- these transcripts are sequestered in the denced by the very rapid recovery of pho- dried gametophytes in messenger ribo- tosystem II activity (Tuba et al., 1996b; nucleoprotein (mRNP) particles (Wood Csintalan et al., 1999; Proctor and and Oliver, 1999). Of 18 rehydrin cDNAs Smirnoff, 2001). isolated (Scott and Oliver, 1994) and How does this relate to cellular repair sequenced (Oliver et al., 1997; Wood et and the uniqueness of bryophytes for al., 1999) in T. ruralis, only three exhibit studying this aspect of desiccation toler- significant sequence homology to known ance? It appears that the level of protec- genes in the Genbank databases. Tr155 has tion that bryophytes are capable of a strong sequence similarity to an alkyl maintaining is not sufficient to completely hydroperoxidase linked to seed dormancy prevent damage, especially to membranes, in barley (Aalen et al., 1994) and during rehydration. To achieve desicca- Arabidopsis embryos (Haslekas et al., tion tolerance, bryophytes thus rely heav- 1998), and in rehydrated but dormant ily on repair mechanisms induced during Bromus secalinas seeds (Goldmark et al., the initial phases of hydration following 1992). Tr213 exhibits a high degree of sim- rewetting (Oliver and Bewley, 1997; ilarity to polyubiquitins from several Oliver et al., 1998). plant sources, suggesting that protein Most work on repair in mosses has cen- turnover may be an important part of tred on the proteins whose synthesis is repair in mosses as well as in induced immediately upon rehydration of angiosperms. Tr288 encodes an LEA-like desiccated gametophytic tissue. Early protein (see above), which suggests that work (see Bewley, 1979, for review) estab- LEA proteins may have a protective role lished the ability of T. ruralis and other during rehydration and a role in cellular mosses to rapidly recover synthetic meta- repair (Velten and Oliver, 2001). 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 30
30 P. Alpert and M.J. Oliver
1.7. Future Prospects and Agricultural tolerance and thus the genetic information Significance necessary for expanding their drought tol- erance may not be exploitable or indeed Our present agricultural system is almost present. In contrast, more may be gained by totally dependent upon the ability of ortho- understanding how stress-tolerant plants or dox seeds to tolerate desiccation. The iden- plant structures accomplish tolerance, and tification and functional analysis of genes from such sources genes that contribute involved in the developmentally pro- directly to tolerance can be identified. As grammed desiccation tolerance stage of pointed out by Bartels and Nelson (1994), seeds is a vital step in understanding this the limiting factor for the improvement of complex trait. The knowledge gained from abiotic stress tolerance in crops is ‘the such studies will impact on many diverse availability of structural genes and regula- areas of agricultural concerns such as tory elements which positively contribute germplasm preservation, seed production to stress tolerance improvement’. If our and seedling establishment. Apart from efforts to utilize our understanding of the genetic considerations, the ongoing studies underlying mechanisms of desiccation tol- on the role of biological glasses in desicca- erance are to bear fruit, we must discover tion tolerance and the determination of and identify the genes that are central to which proteins and sugars are important in this trait. their stability will affect our ability to pre- Cushman and Bohnert (2000) describe a serve viable germplasm for longer periods strategy for cataloguing genes central to of time, preserving genetic diversity for particular traits in their discussion on future breeding needs. This goal will also genomic approaches to plant stress. The be benefited by our continued progress in initial phase of gene discovery is the large- understanding of how desiccation-tolerant scale sequencing of randomly selected tissues deal with oxidative stress. cDNA clones, termed Expressed Sequence Over 35% of the world’s land surface is Tags (ESTs), which are synthesized from considered to be arid or semiarid, experi- mRNA pools representing a specific devel- encing precipitation that is inadequate for opmental stage or response state. EST col- most agricultural uses. Ramanathan (1988) lections that will enhance gene discovery has argued, based on predictions of global in desiccation tolerance have been started, environmental changes, that developing the most extensive of which is that for crops that are more tolerant to water developing seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana deficits while maintaining productivity (Girke et al., 2000). Smaller EST collec- will become a critical requirement in the tions have been made for C. plantagineum early part of this century. Understanding leaves that had been dried for an hour or how plant cells tolerate water loss is a vital fully dried (Bockel et al., 1998) and S. stap- prerequisite for developing strategies that fianus leaves during dehydration can influence agricultural and horticultural (Blomstedt et al., 1998; Neale et al., 2000). crop productivity and survival under these Wood et al. (1999) have established a lim- conditions of decreasing water availability. ited sample of ESTs (152) from a cDNA Much has been accomplished in the dis- library developed from the mRNP fraction covery and characterization of those genes of slowly-dried T. ruralis gametophytes. In that are expressed during the response of the EST collections from vegetative desic- crop and model plants to water deficit or cation-tolerant plant tissues, many of the salt stress. From this work, our knowledge sequenced clones were of unknown iden- of stress tolerance has improved tity (71% for Tortula) and/or not previ- immensely and some success has been ously associated with water stress. achieved, but these traits are very complex Cushman and Bohnert (2000) suggested and breeding progress has been slow. This that this may indicate, as suggested above, approach is also restricted in that most that these plants may possess ‘unique gene crops have a limited capacity for drought complements or regulatory processes that 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 31
Drying Without Dying 31
contribute to desiccation stress’ and, by The next step in the search for insight inference, novel genes that may prove use- into gene function and regulatory controls ful in breeding for drought stress tolerance. in desiccation tolerance will come from the The cataloguing of gene products that are use of expression profiling with cDNA expressed during the acquisition and estab- microarrays. Such work is under way but lishment of desiccation tolerance is only the little has been reported as yet. The first first step. The ultimate goal is to determine information is likely to come from the which genes are central to desiccation toler- analysis of Arabidopsis EST microarrays in ance and what functions they perform. The extensions of the studies reported by Girke major approach used to gain a functional et al. (2000), which may pinpoint tran- understanding of individual gene products scripts to the exact time of the acquisition has been the overexpression of genes in of desiccation tolerance in developing transgenic plants. We have already men- seeds. Direct approaches to elucidate func- tioned the studies of Xu et al. (1996) and tionality of individual genes or gene fami- Sivamani et al. (2000) concerning the over- lies will be slower to develop. The vast expression of HVA1, a Group 3 lea gene, and array of genetic tools, such as transgenic their success in improving drought toler- capability, mutant generation and screen- ance in rice and wheat. Two other groups ing tools, T-DNA and transposon-tagged have attempted to modify sugar metabolism knockouts, and map-based cloning tech- to improve tolerance by engineering tre- nologies, will make Arabidopsis and seed halose 6-phosphate synthetase genes from desiccation tolerance the initial foci of non-plant sources, from yeast (Holmström et functional studies. Nevertheless, tools are al., 1996) and from bacteria (Pilon-Smits et becoming available for vegetative desicca- al., 1998) into tobacco. The aim was to pro- tion-tolerant model plants and these will mote trehalose accumulation in leaf cells, play an important role in evaluating target and both groups were successful and genes. An example of this has been the achieved greater tolerance to water deficits exciting use of activation tagging, by trans- in tobacco. The exciting conclusion from genic random insertion of a highly active these studies, and those with the Group 3 foreign promoter to ‘activate’ native genes, LEA protein, is that the engineering of a sin- by Furini et al. (1997) to isolate a gene gle gene can achieve results that affect such (cDT-1) involved in regulation of the a complex trait as drought tolerance. It will response of C. plantagineum callus to des- be interesting to see how these results will iccation. Advances in the fields of molecu- translate into an advancement in our under- lar biology, genetics, genomics and standing of how these gene products func- biophysics have put us on the threshold of tion to achieve greater tolerance and if these a new era in our quest to understand one of plants will have an impact on drought- the most complex and important traits in tolerance breeding efforts. plant biology: desiccation tolerance.
1.8. References
Aalen, R.B., Opsahl-Ferstad, H.G., Linnestad, C. and Olsen, O.A. (1994) Transcripts encoding an oleosin and a dormancy-related protein are present in both the aleurone layer and in the embryo of developing barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). The Plant Journal 5, 385–396. Alamillo, J., Roncarati, R., Heino, P., Velasco, R., Nelson, D., Elster, R., Brenacchia, G., Furini, A., Schwall, G., Salamini, F. and Bartels, D. (1995) Molecular analysis of desiccation tolerance in barley embryos and in the resurrection plant Craterostigma plantagineum. Agronomie 2, 161–167. Alpert, P. (1979) Desiccation of desert mosses following a summer rainstorm. Bryologist 82, 65–71. Alpert, P. (1985) Distribution quantified by microtopography in an assemblage of saxicolous mosses. Vegetatio 64, 131–139. 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 32
32 P. Alpert and M.J. Oliver
Alpert, P. (1990) Microtopography as habitat structure for mosses on rocks. In: McCoy, E., Bell, S.A. and Mushinsky, H. (eds) Habitat Structure: the Physical Arrangement of Objects in Space. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 120–140. Alpert, P. (2000) The discovery, scope, and puzzle of desiccation tolerance in plants. Plant Ecology 151, 5–17. Alpert, P. and Oechel, W.C. (1985) Carbon balance limits the distribution of Grimmia laevigata, a des- iccation-tolerant plant. Ecology 66, 660–669. Alpert, P. and Oechel, W.C. (1987) Comparative patterns of net photosynthesis in an assemblage of mosses with contrasting microdistributions. American Journal of Botany 74, 1787–1796. Arscott, D.B., Bowden, W.B. and Finlay, J.C. (2000) Effects of desiccation and temperature/irradiance on the metabolism of 2 arctic stream bryophyte taxa. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19, 263–273. Badacsonyi, A., Bates, J.W. and Tuba, Z. (2000) Effect of desiccation on phosphorus and potassium acquisition by a desiccation-tolerant moss and lichen. Annals of Botany 86, 621–627. Baker, J., Steele, C. and Dure, L., III (1988) Sequence and characterization of 6 LEA proteins and their genes from cotton. Planta 175, 485–492. Bartels, D. (1999) Late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins: expression and regulation in the resur- rection plant Craterostigma plantagineum. In: Bowles, D.J., Smallwood, M.F. and Calvert, C.M. (eds) Plant Responses to Environmental Stress. BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford, UK, pp. 153–160. Bartels, D. and Nelson, D. (1994) Approaches to improve stress tolerance using molecular genetics. Plant, Cell and Environment 17, 659–667. Bartels, D., Singh, M. and Salamini, F. (1988) Onset of desiccation-tolerance during development of the barley embryo. Planta 175, 485–492. Bartels, D., Schneider, K., Terstappen, G., Piatkowski, D. and Salamini, F. (1990) Molecular cloning of abscisic acid-modulated genes which are induced during desiccation of the resurrection plant Craterostigma plantagineum. Planta 181, 27–34. Bartels, D., Alexander, R., Schneider, K., Elster, R., Velasco, R., Alamillo, J., Bianchi, G., Nelson, D. and Salamini, F. (1993) Desiccation-related gene products analyzed in a resurrection plant and in barley embryos. In: Close, T.J. and Bray, E.A. (eds) Plant Responses to Cellular Dehydration during Environmental Stress. Current Topics in Plant Physiology Series Vol. 10, American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, USA, pp. 119–127. Barthlott, W. and Porembski, S. (1996) Ecology and morphology of Blossfeldia liliputana (Cactaceae): a poikilohydric and almost astomate succulent. Botanica Acta 109, 161–166. Bates, J.W. (1997) Effects of intermittent desiccation on nutrient economy and growth of two ecologi- cally contrasted mosses. Annals of Botany 79, 299–309. Beckett, R.P., Csintalan, Z. and Tuba, Z. (2000) ABA treatment increases both the desiccation toler- ance of photosynthesis and non-photochemical quenching in the moss Atrichum undulatum. Plant Ecology 151, 65–71. Becquerel, P. (1951) La suspension de la vie des spores des algues, lichens, et mousses aux confins du zéro absolue et rôle de la synérèse réversible pour leur survie au dégel expliquant l’existence de la flore polaire et des hautes altitudes. Comptes Rendues de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris 232, 22–25. Bernacchia, G., Salamini, F. and Bartels, D. (1996) Molecular characterization of the rehydration process in the resurrection plants Craterostigma plantagineum. Plant Physiology 111, 1043–1050. Bernal-Lugo, I. and Leopold, A.C. (1995) Seed stability during storage: raffinose content and seed glassy state. Seed Science Research 5, 75–80.
Bertsch, A. (1966) Uber den CO2-Gaswechsel einiger Flechten nach Wasserdampfaufnahme. Planta 70, 157–166.
Bertsch, A. (1970) CO2-Gaswechsel und Wasseraushalt der aerophilen Grünalge Apatococcus lobotus. Planta 70, 46–72. Bewley, J.D. (1979) Physiological aspects of desiccation-tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 30, 195–238. Bewley, J.D. and Black, M. (1994) Seeds. Physiology of Development and Germination, 2nd edn. Plenum Press, New York. Bewley, J.D. and Krochko, J.E. (1982) Desiccation-tolerance. In: Lange, O.L., Nobel, P.S., Osmond, C.B. and Ziegler, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, Vol 12B, Physiological Ecology II. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 325–378. 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 4/4/02 2:16 pm Page 33
Drying Without Dying 33
Bewley, J.D. and Oliver, M.J. (1992) Desiccation-tolerance in vegetative plant tissues and seeds: protein synthesis in relation to desiccation and a potential role for protection and repair mechanisms. In: Osmond, C.B. and Somero, G. (eds) Water and Life: a Comparative Analysis of Water Relationships at the Organismic, Cellular and Molecular Levels. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 141–160. Bewley, J.D. and Pacey, J. (1978) Desiccation-induced ultrastructural changes in drought-sensitive and drought-tolerant plants. In: Crowe, J.H. and Clegg, J.S. (eds) Dry Biological Systems. Academic Press, London, pp. 53–73. Bewley, J.D., Halmer, P., Krochko, J.E. and Winner W.E. (1978) Metabolism of a drought-tolerant and a drought-sensitive moss: respiration, ATP synthesis and carbohydrate status. In: Crowe, J.H. and Clegg, J.S. (eds) Dry Biological Systems. Academic Press, New York, pp. 185–203. Bewley, J.D., Reynolds, T.L. and Oliver, M.J. (1993) Evolving strategies in the adaptation to desicca- tion. In: Close, T.J. and Bray, E.A. (eds) Plant Responses to Cellular Dehydration During Environmental Stress. Current Topics in Plant Physiology Series, Vol. 10. American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, USA, pp. 193–201. Bianchi, G., Gamba, A., Murelli, C., Salamini, F. and Bartels, D. (1991) Novel carbohydrate metabo- lism in the resurrection plant Craterostigma plantagineum. The Plant Journal 1, 355–359. Bisby, G.R. (1945) Longevity of Schizophyllum commune. Nature 155, 732–733. Bjork, M., Uku, J., Weil, A. and Beer, S. (1999) Photosynthetic tolerances to desiccation of tropical intertidal seagrasses. Marine Ecology–Progress Series 191, 121–126. Black, M., Corbineau, F., Gee, H. and Côme, D. (1999) Water content, raffinose, and dehydrins in the induction of desiccation tolerance in immature wheat embryos. Plant Physiology 120, 463–471. Blackman, S.A., Obendorf, R.L. and Leopold, A.C. (1995) Maturation proteins and sugars in desicca- tion tolerance of developing soybean seeds. Plant Physiology 100, 225–230. Bliss, R.D., Platt-Aloia, K.A. and Thompson, W.W. (1984) Changes in plasmalemma organization in cowpea radicle during imbibition in water and NaCl solutions. Plant Cell and Environment 7, 601–606. Blomstedt, C.K., Neale, A.D., Gianello, R.D., Hamill, J.D. and Gaff, D.F. (1998) Isolation and charac- terization of cDNAs associated with the onset of desiccation tolerance in the resurrection grass, Sporobolus stapfianus. Plant Growth Regulation 24, 219–228. Bochicchio, A., Vazzana, C., Velasco, R., Singh, M. and Bartels, D. (1991) Exogenous ABA induces desiccation tolerance and leads to the synthesis of specific gene transcripts in immature embryos of maize. Maydica 36, 11–16. Bochicchio, A., Vazzana, C., Puliga, S., Alberti, L., Singanelli, S. and Vernieri, P. (1998) Moisture con- tent of the dried leaf is critical to desiccation tolerance in detached leaves of the resurrection plant Boea hygroscopica. Plant Growth Regulation 24, 163–170. Bockel, C., Salamini, F. and Bartels, D. (1998) Isolation and characterization of genes expressed dur- ing early events of the dehydration process in the resurrection plant Craterostigma plan- tagineum. Journal of Plant Physiology 152, 158–166. Boubriak, L., Kargiolaki, H., Lyne, L. and Osborne, D.J. (1997) The requirement for DNA repair in desiccation tolerance of germinating embryos. Seed Science Research 7, 97–105. Bray, E.A. (1997) Plant responses to water deficit. Trends in Plant Science 2, 48–54. Breuil-Sée, A. (1993) Recorded desiccation-survival times in bryophytes. Journal of Bryology 17, 679–684. Broca, P. (1860) Rapport sur la question soumise à la Société de Biologie au sujet de la reviviscence des animaux desséchés. Mémoires de la Société de Biologie, Paris 2, 1–140. Buitink, J. (2000) Biological glasses: nature’s way to preserve life. PhD thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands. Buitink, J., Walters-Vertucci, C., Hoekstra, F.A. and Leprince, O. (1996) Calorimetric properties of dehydrating pollen: analysis of a desiccation-tolerant and an intolerant species. Plant Physiology 111, 235–242. Buitink, J., Claessens, M.M.A.E., Hemmings, M.A. and Hoekstra, F.A. (1998) Influence of water con- tent and temperature on molecular mobility and intracellular glasses in seeds and pollen. Plant Physiology 118, 531–541. Buitink, J., Hemmings, M.A. and Hoekstra, F.A. (2000) Is there a role for oligosacharrides in seed longevity? An assessment of intracellular glass stability. Plant Physiology 122, 1217–1224. Burke, M.J. (1986) The glassy state and survival of anhydrous biological systems. In: Leopold, A.C. (ed.) Membranes, Metabolism and Dry Organisms. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 358–363. 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 34
34 P. Alpert and M.J. Oliver
Calatayud, A., Deltoro, V.I., Barreno, E. and del Valle-Tascón, S. (1997) Changes in in vitro chloro- phyll fluorescence quenching in lichen thalli as a function of water content and suggestion of zeaxanthin-associated photoprotection. Physiologia Plantarum 101, 93–102. Campalans, A., Messeguer, R., Goday, A. and Pages, M. (1999) Plant responses to drought, from ABA signal transduction events to the action of the induced proteins. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 37, 327–340. Chandler, J. and Bartels, D. (1999) Plant desiccation. In: Lerner, H.R. (ed.) Plant Responses to Animal Stress – from Phytohormones to Genome Organization. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 575–590. Clegg, J.S. (1973) Do dried cryptobiotes have a metabolism? In: Crowe, J.H. and Clegg, J.S. (eds) Anhydrobiosis. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, pp. 141–146. Clegg, J.S. (1986) The physical properties and metabolic status of Artemia cysts at low water con- tents: the ‘water replacement hypothesis’. In: Leopold, A.C. (ed.) Membranes, Metabolism, and Dry Organisms. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 169–187. Clegg, J.S. (2001) Cryptobiosis – a peculiar state of biological organization. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 128, 613–624. Close, T. (1997) A commonality in the response of plants to dehydration and low temperature. Physiologia Plantarum 100, 291–296. Crowe, J.H., Hoekstra, F.A. and Crowe, L.M. (1989) Membrane phase transitions are responsible for imbibitional damage in dry pollen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 86, 520–523. Crowe, J.H., Hoekstra, F.A. and Crowe, L.M. (1992) Anhydrobiosis. Annual Review of Physiology 54, 579–599. Crowe, J.H., Clegg, J.S. and Crowe, L.M. (1998a) Anhydrobiosis: the water replacement hypothesis. In: Ried, D.S. (ed.) The Properties of Water in Foods. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp. 440–455. Crowe, J.H., Hoekstra, F.A. and Crowe, L.M. (1998b) The role of vitrification in anhydrobiosis. Annual Reviews of Physiology 60, 73–103. Csintalan, Z., Proctor, M.C.F. and Tuba, Z. (1999) Chlorophyll fluorescence during drying and rehy- dration in the mosses Rhytidiadelphus loreus (Hedw.) Warnst., Anomodon viticulosus (Hedw.) Hook. & Tayl. and Grimmia pulvinata (Hedw.) Sm. Annals of Botany 84, 235–244. Csintalan, Z., Takács, Z., Proctor, M.C.F., Nagy, Z. and Tuba, Z. (2000) Early morning photosynthesis of the moss Tortula ruralis following summer dew fall in a Hungarian temperate dry grassland. Plant Ecology 151, 51–54. Cuming, A.C. (1999) LEA proteins in seed proteins. In: Shewry, P.R. and Casey, R. (eds) Seed Proteins. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 753–780. Cuming, A.C. and Lane, B.G. (1979) Protein synthesis in imbibing wheat embryos. European Journal of Biochemistry 99, 217–224. Cushman, J.C. and Bohnert, H.J. (2000) Genomic approaches to plant stress tolerance. Current Opinions in Plant Biology 3, 117–124. Davey, M.C. (1997) Effects of continuous and repeated dehydration on carbon fixation by bryophytes from the maritime Antarctic. Oecologia 110, 25–31. Davis, J.S. (1972) Survival records in the algae, and the survival role of certain algal pigments, fat and mucilaginous substances. Biologist 54, 52–93. Deltoro, V.I., Calatayud, A., Gimeno, C., Abadia, A. and Barreno, E. (1998) Changes in chlorophyll a
fluorescence, photosynthetic CO2 assimilation and xanthophyll cycle interconversions during dehydration in desiccation-tolerant and intolerant bryophytes. Planta 207, 224–228. Dilks, T.J.K. and Proctor, M.C.F. (1976) Seasonal variation in desiccation tolerance in some British bryophytes. Journal of Bryology 9, 239–247. Dodds, W.K., Gudder, D.A. and Mollenbauer, D. (1995) The ecology of Nostoc. Journal of Phycology 31, 2–18. Doyère, P. (1842) Sur la faculté qui possèdent les tardigrades, les rotifers, les anguillules des toits, et quelques autres animalcules, de revenir à la vie après avoir été complètement desséchées. Annales de Science Naturelle Partie Zoologique 18, 5–35. Drazic, G., Mihailovic, N. and Stevanovic, B. (1999) Chlorophyll metabolism in leaves of the higher poikilohydric plants Ramonda serbica Panc. and R. nathaliae Panc. & Petrov. during dehydra- tion and rehydration. Journal of Plant Physiology 154, 379–384. Dure, L. III (1993a) A repeating 11-mer amino acid motif and plant desiccation. The Plant Journal 3, 363–369. 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 35
Drying Without Dying 35
Dure, L. III (1993b) Structural motifs in Lea proteins. In: Close, T.J. and Bray, E.A. (eds) Plant Responses to Cellular Dehydration During Environmental Stress. Current Topics in Plant Physiology Series Vol. 10, American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, Maryland, pp. 91–103. Dure, L. III, Crouch, M., Harada, J., Ho, T.-H.D., Mundy, J., Quatrano, R., Thomas, T. and Sung, Z.R. (1989) Common amino sequence domains among LEA proteins of higher plants. Plant Molecular Biology 12, 475–486. Eickmeier, W.G. (1980) Photosynthetic recovery of resurrection spike mosses from different hydra- tion regimes. Oecologia 46, 380–385. Eickmeier, W.G. (1983) Photosynthetic recovery of the resurrection plant Selaginella lepidophylla: effects of prior desiccation rate and mechanisms of desiccation damage. Oecologia 58, 115–120. Eickmeier, W.G. (1986) The correlation between high temperature and desiccation tolerance in a poikilohydric desert plant. Canadian Journal of Botany 64, 611–617. Eickmeier, W.G., Casper, C. and Osmond, C.B. (1993) Chlorophyll fluorescence in the resurrection plant Selaginella lepidophylla (Hook & Grev.) Spring during high-light and desiccation stress, and evidence for zeaxanthin-associated photoprotection. Planta 189, 30–38. Evans, J.H. (1959) Survival of freshwater algae during dry periods. Part II. Drying experiments. Part III. Stratification of algae in pond margin litter and mud. Journal of Ecology 47, 55–81. Farrant, J.M. (2000) A comparison of mechanisms of desiccation tolerance among three angiosperm resurrection plant species. Plant Ecology 151, 29–39. Farrant, J.M., Cooper, K., Kruger, L.A. and Sherwin, H.W. (1999) The effect of drying rate on the sur- vival of three desiccation-tolerant angiosperm species. Annals of Botany 84, 371–379. Franks, A.J. and Bergstrom, D.M. (2000) Corticolous bryophytes in microphyll fern forests of south-east Queensland: distribution on Antarctic beech (Nothofagus moorei). Australian Ecology 25, 386–393. Friedmann, E.I. and Galun, M. (1974) Desert algae, lichens, and fungi. In: Brown, G.W. Jr (ed.) Desert Biology. Academic Press, New York, pp. 165–212. Furini, A., Koncz, C., Salamini, F. and Bartels, D. (1997) High level transcription of a member of a repeated gene family confers dehydration tolerance to callus tissue of Craterostigma plan- tagineum. EMBO Journal 16, 3599–3608. Gaff, D.F. (1977) Desiccation tolerant vascular plants of southern Africa. Oecologia 31, 95–109. Gaff, D.F. (1980) Protoplasmic tolerance of extreme stress. In: Turner, N.C. and Kramer, P.J. (eds) Adaptation of Plants to Water and High Temperature Stress. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 207–230. Gaff, D.F. (1981) The biology of resurrection plants. In: Pate, J.S. and McComb, A.J. (eds) The Biology of Australian Plants. University of Western Australia Press, Nedlands, pp. 114–146. Gaff, D.F. (1986) Desiccation tolerant ‘resurrection’ grasses from Kenya and West Africa. Oecologia 70, 118–120. Gaff, D.F. (1987) Desiccation tolerant plants in South America. Oecologia 74, 133–136. Gaff, D.F. (1989) Responses of desiccation tolerant ‘resurrection’ plants to water stress. In: Kreeb, K.H., Richter, H. and Hinckley, T.M. (eds) Structural and Functional Responses to Environmental Stresses. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 255–268. Gaff, D.F. (1997) Mechanisms of desiccation tolerance in resurrection vascular plants. In: Basra, A.S. and Basra, R.K. (eds) Mechanisms of Environmental Stress Resistance in Plants. Harwood Academic Publishers, London, pp. 43–58. Gaff, D.F. and Churchill, D.M. (1976) Borya nitida Labill. – an Australian species in the Liliaceae with desiccation-tolerant leaves. Australian Journal of Botany 24, 209–224. Gaff, D.F. and Giess, W. (1986) Drought resistance in water plants in rock pools of southern Africa. Dinteria 18, 17–37. Gaff, D. and Hallam, N.D. (1974) Resurrecting desiccated plants. In: Bieleski, R.L., Ferguson, A.R. and Cresswell, M.M. (eds) Mechanisms of Regulation of Plant Growth. Royal Society of New Zealand Bulletin 12, Wellington, pp. 389–393. Gaff, D.F. and Latz, P.K. (1978) The occurrence of resurrection plants in the Australian flora. Australian Journal of Botany 26, 485–492. Gaff, D.F. and Sutaryono, Y.A. (1991) Grasses with complete desiccation tolerance. In: Proceedings of IVth International Rangeland Congress. French Grasslands Society, Montpellier, France, pp. 266–267. Gaff, D., Bartels, S.-Y. and O’Brien, T.P. (1976) The fine structure of dehydrated and reviving leaves of Borya nitida Labill. – a desiccation-tolerant plant. Australian Journal of Botany 24, 225–236. 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 36
36 P. Alpert and M.J. Oliver
Galau, G.A. and Hughes, D.W. (1987) Coordinate accumulation of homologous transcripts of seven cot- ton lea gene families during embryogenesis and germination. Developmental Biology 123, 213–221. Galau, G.A., Bijaisoradat, N. and Hughes, D.W. (1987) Accumulation kinetics of cotton late embryo- genesis-abundant mRNAs: coordinate regulation during embryogenesis and the role of abscisic acid. Developmental Biology 123, 198–212. Galau, G.A., Jakobsen, K.S. and Hughes, D.W. (1991) The controls of late dicot embryogenesis and early germination. Physiologia Plantarum 81, 280–288. Galau, G.A., Wang, H.Y.C. and Hughes, D.W. (1993) Cotton Lea5 and Lea14 encode atypical late embryogenesis-abundant proteins. Plant Physiology 101, 695–696. Gauslaa, Y. and Solhaug, K.A. (1996) Differences in the susceptibility to light stress between epi- phytic lichens of ancient and young boreal forest stands. Functional Ecology 10, 344–354. Gildner, B.S. and Larson, D.W. (1992) Seasonal changes in photosynthesis in the desiccation-tolerant fern Polypodium virginianum. Oecologia 89, 383–389. Gimingham, C.H. and Smith, R.I.L. (1971) Growth form and water relations of mosses in the mar- itime Antarctic. British Antarctic Survey Bulletin 25, 1–21. Girke, T., Todd, J., Ruuska, S., White, J., Benning, C. and Ohlrogge, J. (2000) Microarray analysis of developing Arabidopsis seeds. Plant Physiology 124, 1570–1581. Glime, J.M. and Carr, R.E. (1974) Temperature survival of Fontinalis novae-angliae. Bryologist 77, 17–22. Goldmark, P.J., Curry, J., Morris, C.F. and Walker-Simmons, M.K. (1992) Cloning and expression of an embryo-specific mRNA up-regulated in hydrated dormant seeds. Plant Molecular Biology 19, 433–441. Goldsworthy, D.A. and Drennan, P.M. (1991) Anhydrous fixation of desiccated leaves of Myrothamnus flabellifolius Welw. Electron Microscopy Society of South Africa 21, 105–106. Golovina, E.A., Hoekstra, F.A. and Hemmings, M.A. (1998) Drying increases intracellular partitioning of amphiphilic substances into the lipid phase. Plant Physiology 114, 975–986. Gratani, L., Crescente, M.F. and Rossi, G. (1998) Photosynthetic performance and water use efficiency of the fern Cheilanthes persica. Photosynthetica 35, 507–516. Green, T.G.A. and Lange, O.L. (1994) Photosynthesis in poikilohydric plants: a comparison of lichens and bryophytes. In: Schulze, E.-D. and Caldwell, M.M. (eds) Ecophysiology of Photosynthesis. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 320–341. Grime, J.P. (1979) Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK. Guo, N., Puhlev, I., Brown, D.R., Mansbridge, J. and Levine, F. (2000) Trehalose expression confers desiccation tolerance on human cells. Nature Biotechnology 18, 168–171. Hahn, S.C., Tenhunen, J.D., Popp, P.W., Meyer, A. and Lange, O.L. (1993) Upland tundra in the foothills of the Brooks Range, Alaska: diurnal carbon dioxide exchange patterns of characteristic lichen species. Flora 188, 125–143. Hallam, N.D. and Luff, S.E. (1980) Fine structural changes in the mesophyll tissue of the leaves of Xerophyta villosa during desiccation. Botanical Gazette 141, 173–179. Hammoudah, M.M., Nir, S., Bentz, J., Mayhew, E., Stewart, T.P., Hui, S.W. and Kurland, R.J. (1981) Interactions of La3+ with phosphatidylserine vesicles binding, phase transition, leakage, 31P- NMR and fusion. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 645, 102–114. Haslekas, C., Stacy, R.A.P., Nygaard, V., Culianez Macia, F.A. and Aalen, R.B. (1998) The expression of a peroxiredoxin antioxidant gene, AtPer1, in Arabidopsis thaliana is seed specific and related to dormancy. Plant Molecular Biology 36, 833–845. Hernandez-Garcia, C.D., Gonzales-Mancebo, J.M. and Losada-Lim, A. (1999) Water relations of some mosses growing in pine forests of Tenerife, Canary Islands. Lindbergia 24, 15–22. Hinton, H.E. (1968) Reversible suspension of metabolism and the origin of life. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 171, 43–57. Hoekstra, F.A., Crowe, J.H., Crowe, L.M. and van Bilsen, D.G.J.L. (1992) Membrane behavior and stress tolerance in pollen. In: Ottaviano, E., Mulcahy, D.L., Sari Gorla, M. and Bergamini Mulcahy, G. (eds) Angiosperm Pollen and Ovules. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 177–186. Hoekstra, F.A., Haigh, A.M., Tetteroo, F.A.A. and van Roekel, T. (1994) Changes in soluble sugars in relation to desiccation tolerance in cauliflower seeds. Seed Science Research 4, 143–147. Hoekstra, F.A., Wolkers, W.F., Buitink, J., Golovina, E.A., Crowe, J.H. and Crowe, L.M. (1997) Mem- brane stabilization in the dry state. Comparative Biochemistry and Biophysics 117A, 335–341. Hoekstra, F.A., Golvina, E.A., van Elst, A.C. and Hemminga, M.A. (1999) Imbibitional leakage from anhydrobiotes revisited. Plant, Cell, and Environment 22, 1121–1131. 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 37
Drying Without Dying 37
Holmström, K.O., Mantyla, E., Welin, B., Mandal, A. and Palva, E.T. (1996) Drought tolerance in tobacco. Science 379, 683–684. Horbowicz, M. and Obendorf, R.L. (1994) Seed desiccation tolerance and storability: dependence on flatulence-producing oligosaccharides and cyclitols – review and survey. Seed Science Research 4, 385–405. Hosokawa, T. and Kubota, H. (1957) On the osmotic pressure and resistance to desiccation of epi- phytic mosses from a beech forest, south-west Japan. Journal of Ecology 45, 579–591. Hsu, S.-J. and Hsu, B.-D. (1998) Flow cytometry of Chlorella after dehydration stress. Plant Science 134, 163–169. Ingram, J. and Bartels, D. (1996) The molecular basis of dehydration tolerance in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 47, 377–403. Iturriaga, G., Gaff, D.F. and Zentella, R. (2000) New desiccation-tolerant plants, including a grass, in the central highlands of Mexico accumulate trehalose. Australian Journal of Botany 48, 153–158. Jawad, A., Snelling, A.M., Heritage, J. and Hawkey, P.M. (1998) Exceptional desiccation tolerance of Acinetobacter radioresistens. Journal of Hospital Infection 39, 235–240. Kappen, L. (1964) Untersuchungen über den Jahreslauf der Frost-, Hitze- und Austrocknungsresistenz von Sporophyten einheimischer Polypodiaceen (Filicinae). Flora 156, 101–115. Kappen, L. (1993) Lichens in the Antarctic region. In: Friedmann, E.I. (ed.) Antarctic Microbiology. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp. 433–490. Kappen, L. and Valladares, F. (1999) Opportunistic growth and desiccation tolerance: the ecological success of poikilohydrous autotrophs. In: Pugnaire, F.I. and Valladares, F. (eds) Handbook of Functional Plant Ecology. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 10–80. Kappen, L., Lange, O.L., Schulze, E.-D., Evenari, M. and Buschbom, U. (1979) Ecophysiological investigations on lichens of the Negev desert. 6. Annual course of the photosynthetic production of Ramalina maciformis (Del.) Bory. Flora 168, 85–108. Kappen, L., Lange, O.L., Schulze, E.-D., Buschbom, U. and Evenari, M. (1980) Ecophysiological investigations on lichens of the Negev desert. 7. Influence of the habitat exposure on dew imbi- bition and photosynthetic productivity. Flora 169, 216–229. Keever, C. (1957) Establishment of Grimmia laevigata on bare granite. Ecology 38, 422–429. Keilin, D. (1959) The problem of anabiosis or latent life: history and current concept. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 150, 149–191. Koorneef, M., Hanhart, C.J., Hilhorst, H.W.M. and Karssen, C.M. (1989) In vivo inhibition of seed development and reserve protein accumulation in recombinants of abscisic acid biosynthesis and responsiveness mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiology 90, 463–469. Kuang, J., Gaff, D.F., Gianello, R.D., Blomstedt, C.K., Neale, A.D. and Hamill, J.D. (1995) Changes in in vivo protein complements in drying leaves of the desiccation-tolerant grass Sporobolus stapfi- anus and the desiccation-sensitive grass Sporobolus pyramidalis. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 22, 1027–1034. Kubitzki, K. (1998) Velloziaceae. In: Kubitzki, K. (ed.) The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 459–467. Lange, O.L. (1953) Hitze- und Trockenresistenz der Flechten in Bezeihung zu ihrer Verbreitung. Flora 140, 39–97.
Lange, O.L. (1969) CO2-Gaswechsel von Moosen nach Wasserdampfaufnahme aus dem Luftraum. Planta 89, 90–94. Lange, O.L. and Kilian, E. (1985) Reaktiviertung der Photosynthese trockener Flechten durch Wasserdampfaufnahme aus dem Luftraum: artspezifisch unterschiedliches Verhalten. Flora 192, 1–15. Lange, O.L., Meyer, A., Zellner, H. and Heber, U. (1994) Photosynthesis and water relations of lichen soil crusts: field measurements in the coastal fog zone of the Namib Desert. Functional Ecology 8, 253–264. Lange, O.L., Green, T.G.A., Reichenberger, H. and Ziegler, H. (1996) Photosynthetic depression at high water contents in lichens: concurrent use of gas exchange and fluorescence techniques with cyanobacterial and green algal Peltigera species. Botanica Acta 109, 43–50. Lange, O.L., Belnap, J., Reichenberger, H. and Meyer, A. (1997) Photosynthesis of green algal soil crust lichens from arid lands in southern Utah, USA: role of water content on light and tempera-
ture responses of CO2 exchange. Flora 192, 1–15. 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 38
38 P. Alpert and M.J. Oliver
Larson, D.W. (1988) The impact of ten years at 20°C on gas exchange in five lichen species. Oecologia 78, 87–92 Lazarides, M. (1992) Resurrection grasses (Poaceae) in Australia. In: Chapman, G.P. (ed.) Desertified Grasslands: Their Biology and Management. Academic Press, London, pp. 213–234. Lebkeucher, J.G. and Eickmeier, W.G. (1993) Physiological benefits of stem curling for resurrection plants in the field. Ecology 74, 1073–1080. Leopold, A.C., Sun, W.Q. and Bernal-Lugo, I. (1994) The glassy state in seeds: analysis and function. Seed Science Research 4, 267–274. Leprince, O. and Walters-Vertucci, C. (1995) A calorimetric study of glass transition behaviors in axes of bean with relevance to storage stability. Plant Physiology 109, 1471–1481. Leprince, O., Hendry, G.A.F. and McKersie, B.D. (1993) The mechanisms of desiccation-tolerance in developing seeds. Seed Science Research 3, 231–246. Leuschner, C., Landwehr, S. and Mehlig, U. (1998) Limitation of carbon assimilation of intertidal Zostera noltii and Z. marina by desiccation at low tide. Aquatic Botany 62, 171–176. Lovelock, C.E., Jackson, A.E., Melic, D.R. and Seppelt, R.D. (1995) Reversible photoinhibition in Antarctic moss during freezing and thawing. Plant Physiology 109, 955–961. Lüttge, U. (1997) Cyanobacterial Tintenstrich communities and their ecology. Naturwissenschaften 84, 526–534. Mahan, J.R., Oliver, M.J. and Sherman, T.D. (1998) Nitrate reductase activity during desiccation and rehydration of the desiccation-tolerant moss Tortula ruralis. Environmental and Experimental Botany 39, 67–76. Mao, Z.Y., Palva, R., Kriz, A.L. and Juvik, J.A. (1995) Dehydrin gene expression in normal and vivip- arous embryos of Zea mays during seed development and germination. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 33, 649–653. Markovska, Y.K., Tsonev, T. and Kimenov, G. (1997) Regulation of CAM and respiratory recycling by water supply in higher poikilohydric plants – Haberlea rhodopensis Friv. and Ramonda serbica Panc. at transition from biosis to anabiosis and vice versa. Botanica Acta 110, 18–24. Marschall, M. (1998) Nitrate reductase activity during desiccation and rehydration of the desicca- tion-tolerant moss Tortula ruralis and the leafy liverwort Porella platyphylla. Journal of Bryology 20, 273–285. Mazur, P. (1968) Survival of fungi after freezing and desiccation. In: Ainsworth, G.C. and Sussman, A.L. (eds) The Fungi. Academic Press, London, pp. 325–394. McCubbin, W.D., Kay, C.M. and Lane, B.G. (1985) Hydrodynamic and optical properties of the wheat germ Em protein. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology 63, 803–811. Meurs, C., Basra, A.S., Karssen, C.M. and van Loon, L.C. (1992) Role of abscisic acid in the induction of desiccation tolerance in developing seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiology 98, 1484–1493. Mitchell, D.N., Davidson, A.W. and Cooke, J.A. (1999) The bryophytes of magnesian limestone sea cliffs, County Durham: a multivariate analysis of community–environment relationships. Transactions of the Natural History Society of Northumbria 99, 59. Montenegro, G., Hoffmann, A.J., Aljaro, M.E. and Hoffman, A.E. (1979) Satureja gillesii: a poikilohydric shrub from the Chilean Mediterranean vegetation. Canadian Journal of Botany 57, 1206–1213. Morrison-Baird, L.A., Leopold, A.C., Bramlage, W.J. and Webster, B.D. (1979) Ultrastructural modifi- cations associated with imbibition of the soybean radicle. Botanical Gazette 140, 316–320. Mudgett, M.B., Lowensen, J.D. and Clarke, S. (1997) Protein repair L-isoaspartyl methyltransferase in plants. Phylogenetic distribution and the accumulation of substrate proteins in aged barley seeds. Plant Physiology 115, 1481–1489. Muller, J., Sprender, N., Bortlik, K., Boller, T. and Wiemken, A. (1997) Desiccation increases sucrose levels in Ramonda and Haberlea, two genera of resurrection plants in the Gesneriaceae. Physiologia Plantarum 100, 153–158. Muslin, E.H. and Homann, P.H. (1992) Light as a hazard for the desiccation-resistant ‘resurrection’ fern Polypodium polypodioides L. Plant, Cell and Environment 15, 81–89. Nash, T.H. and Moser, T.J. (1982) Vegetational and physiological patterns of lichens in North American deserts. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Club 53, 331–336. Neale, A.D., Blomstedt, C.K., Bronson, P., Le, T.-N., Guthridge, K., Evans, J., Gaff, D.F. and Hamill, J.D. (2000) The isolation of genes from the resurrection grass Sporobolus stapfianus which are induced during severe drought stress. Plant, Cell and Environment 23, 265–277. 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 39
Drying Without Dying 39
Nienow, J.A. and Friedmann, E.I. (1993) Terrestrial lithophytic (rock) communities. In: Friedmann, E.I. (ed.) Antarctic Microbiology. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp. 343–412. Nobel, P.S. (1978) Microhabitat, water relations, and photosynthesis of a desert fern, Notholaena par- ryi. Oecologia 31, 293–309. Norr, M. (1974) Hitzresistenz bei Moosen. Flora 163, 388–397. Oliver, M.J. (1991) Influence of protoplasmic water loss on the control of protein synthesis in the des- iccation-tolerant moss Tortula ruralis: ramifications for a repair-based mechanism of desicca- tion-tolerance. Plant Physiology 97, 1501–1511. Oliver, M.J. and Bewley J.D. (1984) Desiccation and ultrastructure in bryophytes. Advances in Bryology 2, 91–131. Oliver, M.J. and Bewley, J.D. (1997) Desiccation-tolerance of plant tissues: a mechanistic overview. Horticultural Reviews 18, 171–214. Oliver, M.J. and Wood, A.J. (1997) Desiccation-tolerance in mosses. In: Koval, T.M. (ed.) Stress Induced Processes in Higher Eukaryotic Cells. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 1–26. Oliver, M.J., Wood, A.J. and O’Mahony, P. (1997) How some plants recover from vegetative desicca- tion: A repair based strategy. Acta Physiologia Plantarum 19, 419–425. Oliver, M.J., Wood, A.J. and O’Mahony, P. (1998) ‘To dryness and beyond’ – preparation for the dried state and rehydration in vegetative desiccation-tolerant plants. Plant Growth Regulation 24, 193–201. Oliver, M.J., Tuba, Z. and Mishler, B.D. (2000) The evolution of vegetative desiccation tolerance in land plants. Plant Ecology 151, 85–100. O’Mahony, P. and Oliver, M.J. (1999a) Characterization of a desiccation responsive small GTP-bind- ing protein (Rab2) from the desiccation tolerant grass Sporobolus stapfianus. Plant Molecular Biology 39, 809–821. O’Mahony, P. and Oliver, M.J. (1999b) The involvement of ubiquitin in vegetative desiccation-toler- ance. Plant Molecular Biology 41, 657–667. Öpik, H. (1980) The ultrastructure of coleoptile cells in dry rice (Oryza sativa L.) grains after anhy- drous fixation with osmium tetroxide vapour. New Phytologist 85, 521–529. Öpik, H. (1985) The fine structure of some dry seed tissues observed after completely anhydrous chemical fixation. Annals of Botany 56, 453–466. Oxford English Dictionary (1989) Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. Pence, V.C. (2000) Cryopreservation of in vitro grown fern gametophytes. American Fern Journal 90, 16–23. Pilon-Smits, E.A.H., Terry, N., Sears Tobin, K.H., Zayed, A., Hwang, S., van Dun, K., Voogd, E., Verwoerd, T.C., Krutwagen, R.W.H.H. and Goddijn, O.J.M. (1998) Trehalose-producing trans- genic tobacco plants show improved growth performance under drought stress. Journal of Plant Physiology 152, 525–532. Pintado, A., Valladares, F. and Sancho, L.G. (1997) Exploring phenotypic plasticity in the lichen Ramalina capitata: morphology, water relations and chlorophyll content in north- and south- facing populations. Annals of Botany 80, 345–353. Platt, K.A., Oliver, M.J. and Thomson, W.W. (1994) Membranes and organelles of dehydrated Selaginella and Tortula retain their normal configuration and structural integrity: freeze fracture evidence. Protoplasma 178, 57–65. Platt-Aloia, K.A., Lord, E.M., DeMason, D.A. and Thompson, W.W. (1986) Freeze-fracture observations on membranes of dry and hydrated pollen from Collomia, Phoenix, and Zea. Planta 168, 291–298. Porembski, S. and Barthlott, W. (2000) Granitic and gneissic outcrops (inselbergs) as center of diver- sity for desiccation-tolerant vascular plants. Plant Ecology 151, 19–28. Potts, M. (1994) Desiccation tolerance of prokaryotes. Microbiology Review 58, 755–805. Potts, M. (1999) Mechanisms of desiccation tolerance in cyanobacteria. European Journal of Phycology 57, 43–68. Pouchet, F.A. (1859) Expériences sur la résistance vitale des animalcules pseudo-ressuscitants. Comptes Rendues de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris 49, 886–888. Proctor, M.C.F. (1982) Physiological ecology: water relations, light and temperature responses, carbon balance. In: Smith, A.J.E. (ed.) Bryophyte Ecology. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 333–381. Proctor, M.C.F. (1990) The physiological basis of bryophyte production. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 104, 61–77. 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 40
40 P. Alpert and M.J. Oliver
Proctor, M.C.F. (2000) The bryophyte paradox: tolerance of desiccation, evasion of drought. Plant Ecology 151, 41–49. Proctor, M.C.F. and Smirnoff, N. (2001) Rapid recovery of photosystems on rewetting desiccation-tol- erant mosses: chlorophyll fluorescence and inhibitor experiments. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 1695–1704. Proctor, M.C.F., Nagy, Z., Csintalan, Z. and Takács, Z. (1998) Water-content components in bryophytes: analysis of pressure–volume relationships. Journal of Experimental Botany 49, 1845–1854. Ramanathan, V. (1988) The greenhouse theory of climate change: a test by an inadvertent global experiment. Science 240, 293–299. Reynolds, T.L. and Bewley, J.D. (1993a) Characterization of protein synthetic changes in a desicca- tion-tolerant fern, Polypodium virginianum. Comparison of the effects of drying, rehydration and abscisic acid. Journal of Experimental Botany 44, 921–928. Reynolds, T.L. and Bewley, J.D. (1993b) Abscisic acid enhances the ability of the desiccation tolerant fern Polypodium virginianum to withstand drying. Journal of Experimental Botany 44, 1771–1779. Richardson, D.H.S. (1981) The Biology of Mosses. Blackwell Scientific, New York. Ried, A. (1960) Stoffwechsel und Verbreitungsgrenzen von Flechten. II. Wasser- und Assimilationshaushalt, Entquellungs- und Submersionsresistenz von Krustenflechten benach- barter Standorte. Flora 149, 345–385. Roberts, J.K., DeSimone, N.A., Lingle, W.L. and Dure, L. III (1993) Cellular concentrations and uni- formity of cell-type accumulation of two LEA proteins in cotton embryos. Plant Cell 5, 769–780. Robinson, S.A., Wasley, J., Popp, M. and Lovelock, C.E. (2000) Desiccation tolerance of three moss species from continental Antarctica. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27, 379–388. Roos, Y.H. (1995) Phase Transitions in Foods. Academic Press, London. Rundel, P.W. and Lange, O.L. (1980) Water relations and photosynthetic response of a desert moss. Flora 169, 329–335. Sagot, C. and Rochefort, L. (1996) Sphagnum desiccation tolerance. Cryptogamie, Bryologie et Lichenologie 17, 171–183. Sales, K., Brandt, W., Rumbak, E. and Lindsey, G. (2000) The Lea-like protein HSP 12 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae has a plasma membrane location and protects membranes against desic- cation and ethanol-induced stress. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta Biomembranes 1463, 267–278. Sancho, L.G., Schroeter, B. and Valladares, F. (1997) Photosynthetic performance of two closely related Umbilicaria species in central Spain: temperature as a key factor. Lichenologist 29, 67–82. Scheidegger, C., Frey, B. and Schroeter, B. (1997) Cellular water uptake, translocation and PSII acti- vation during rehydration of desiccated Lobaria pulmonaria and Nephroma bellum. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 67, 105–117. Schierbeek, A. (1959) Measuring the Invisible World. Abelard-Schuman, London. Schipperges, B. and Rydin, H. (1998) Response of photosynthesis of Sphagnum species from contrast- ing microhabitats to tissue water content and repeated desiccation. New Phytologist 140, 677–684 Schonbeck, M.W. and Bewley, J.D. (1981) Responses of the moss Tortula ruralis to desiccation treat- ments. II. Variations in desiccation tolerance. Canadian Journal of Botany 59, 2707–2712. Schonbeck, M. and Norton, T.A. (1978) Factors controlling the upper limits of fucoid algae on the shore. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 31, 303–313. Schroeter, B., Green, T.G.A., Kappen, L. and Seppelt, R.D. (1994) Carbon dioxide exchange at subzero temperatures. Field measurements on Umbilicaria aprina in Antarctica. Cryptogamic Botany 4, 233–241. Scott, G.A.M. (1982) Desert bryophytes. In: Smith, A.J.E. (ed.) Bryophyte Ecology. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 105–212. Scott, H.B. II and Oliver, M.J. (1994) Accumulation and polysomal recruitment of transcripts in response to desiccation and rehydration of the moss Tortula ruralis. Journal of Experimental Botany 45, 577–583. Scott, P. (2000) Resurrection plants and the secrets of eternal leaf. Annals of Botany 85, 159–166. Seel, W.E., Baker, N.R. and Lee, J.A. (1992) The combined effects of desiccation and irradiance on mosses from xeric and hydric habitats. Journal of Experimental Botany 43, 1023–1030. Senaratna, T. and McKersie, B.D. (1983a) Dehydration injury in germinating soybean (Glycine max L. Merr) seeds. Plant Physiology 72, 620–624. 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 41
Drying Without Dying 41
Senaratna, T. and McKersie, B.D. (1983b) Characterization of solute efflux from dehydration injured soybean (Glycine max L. Merr) seeds. Plant Physiology 72, 911–914. Sherwin, H.W. and Farrant, J.M. (1996) Differences in rehydration of three desiccation-tolerant angiosperm species. Annals of Botany 78, 703–710. Sherwin, H.W. and Farrant, J.M. (1998) Protection mechanisms against excess light in the resur- rection plants Craterostigma wilmsii and Xerophyta viscosa. Plant Growth Regulation 24, 203–210. Sherwin, H.W., Pammenter, N.W., February, E., Vander Willigen, C. and Farrant, J.M. (1998) Xylem hydraulic characteristics, water relations and wood anatomy of the resurrection plant Myrothamnus flabellifolius Welw. Annals of Botany 81, 567–575. Shirazi, A.M., Muir, P.S. and McCune, B. (1996) Environmental factors influencing the distribution of the lichens Lobaria oregana and L. pulmonaria. Bryologist 99, 12–18. Simon, E.W. (1974) Phospholipids and plant membrane permeability. New Phytologist 73, 377–420. Simon, E.W. (1978) Membranes in dry and imbibing seeds. In: Crowe, J.H. and Clegg, J.S. (eds) Dry Biological Systems. Academic Press, New York, pp. 205–224. Sivamani, E., Bahieldin, A., Wraith, J.M., Al-Niemi, T., Dyer, W.E., Ho, T.H.D. and Qu, R.D. (2000) Improved biomass productivity and water use efficiency under water deficit conditions in trans- genic wheat constitutively expressing the barley HVA1 gene. Plant Science 155, 1–9. Skriver, K. and Mundy, J. (1990) Gene expression in response to abscisic acid and osmotic stress. Plant Cell 2, 503–512. Smirnoff, N. (1992) The carbohydrates of bryophytes in relation to desiccation-tolerance. Journal of Bryology 17, 185–191. Smirnoff, N. (1993) The role of active oxygen in the response of plants to water deficit and desicca- tion. New Phytologist 125, 27–58 Smith, M.T. (1991) Studies on the anhydrous fixation of dry seeds of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). New Phytologist 119, 575–584. Sojo, F., Valladares, F. and Sancho, L.G. (1997) Structural and physiological plasticity of the lichen Catillaria corymbosa in different microhabitats of the maritime Antarctic. Bryologist 100, 171–179. Stark, L.R. (1997) Phenology and reproductive biology of Syntrichia inermis (Bryopsida, Pottiaceae) in the Mojave Desert. Bryologist 100, 13–27. Strauss, G. and Hauser, H. (1986) Stabilization of small uni-lamellar phospholipid vesicles by sucrose during freezing and dehydration. In: Leopold, A.C. (ed.) Membranes, Metabolism and Dry Organisms. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 318–326. Sun, W.Q. (1997) Glassy state and seed storage stability: the WLF kinetics of seed viability loss at T-
T8 and the plasticization effect of water on storage stability. Annals of Botany 79, 291–297. Sun, W.Q. and Leopold, A.C. (1997) Cytoplasmic vitrification and survival of anhydrobiotic organ- isms. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 117A, 327–333. Sun, W.Q., Irving, T.C. and Leopold, A.C. (1994) The role of sugar, vitrification and membrane phase transition in seed desiccation tolerance. Physiologia Plantarum 90, 621–628. Takács, Z., Csintalan, Z., Sass, L., Laitat, E., Vass, I. and Tuba, Z. (1999) UV-B tolerance of bryophyte species with different degrees of desiccation tolerance. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 48, 210–215. Tetteroo, F.A.A., deBruijn, A.Y., Henselmans, R.N.M., Wolkers, W.F., van Aelst, A.C. and Hoekstra, F.A. (1996) Characterization of membrane properties in desiccation-tolerant and -intolerant car- rot somatic embryos. Plant Physiology 111, 403–412. Thompson, J.W. and Iltis, H.H. (1968) A fog-induced lichen community in the coastal desert of southern Peru. Bryologist 71, 31–34. Thompson, W.W. (1979) Ultrastructure of dry seed tissue after a non-aqueous primary fixation. New Phytologist 82, 207–212. Thompson, W.W. and Platt-Aloia, K.A. (1982) Ultrastructure and membrane permeability in cowpea seeds. Plant, Cell, and Environment 5, 367–373. Tiwari, S.C., Polito, V.S. and Webster, B.D. (1990) In dry pear (Pyrus communis L.) pollen, mem- branes assume a tightly packed multilamellate aspect that disperses rapidly upon hydration. Protoplasma 153, 157–168. Trainor, F.R. and Gladych, R. (1995) Survival of algae in a desiccated soil: a 35-year study. Phycologia 34, 191–192. 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 42
42 P. Alpert and M.J. Oliver
Tuba, Z., Lichtenthaler, H.K., Maroti, I. and Csintalan, Z. (1993a) Resynthesis of thylakoids and func- tional chloroplasts in the desiccated leaves of the poikilochlorophyllous plant Xerophyta scabrida upon rehydration. Journal of Plant Physiology 142, 742–748. Tuba, Z., Lichtenthaler, H.K., Csintalan, Z. and Pócs, T. (1993b) Regreening of desiccated leaves of the poikilochlorophyllous Xerophyta scabrida upon rehydration. Journal of Plant Physiology 142, 103–108. Tuba, Z., Lichtenthaler, H.K., Csintalan, Z., Nagy, Z. and Szente, K. (1994) Reconstitution of chloro-
phylls and photosynthetic CO2 assimilation upon rehydration of the desiccated poikilochloro- phyllous plant Xerophyta scabrida (Pax) Th. Dur. et Schinz. Planta 192, 414–420. Tuba, Z., Csintalan, Z. and Proctor, M.C.F. (1996a) Photosynthetic responses of a moss, Tortula ruralis, ssp. ruralis, and the lichens Cladonia convoluta and C. furcata to water deficit and short periods of desiccation, and their ecophysiological significance: a baseline study at present-day
CO2 concentration. New Phytologist 133, 353–361. Tuba, Z., Lichtenthalter, H.K., Csintalan, Z., Nagy, Z. and Szente, K. (1996b) Loss of chlorophylls,
cessation of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation and respiration in the poikilochlorophyllous plant Xerophyta scabrida during desiccation. Physiologia Plantarum 96, 383–388. Tuba, Z., Smirnoff, N., Csintalan, Z., Szente, K. and Nagy, Z. (1997) Respiration during slow desicca- tion of the poikilochlorophyllous desiccation tolerant plant Xerophyta scabrida at present-day
CO2 concentration. Journal of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 35, 381–386. Tuba, Z., Proctor, M.C.F. and Csintalan, Z. (1998) Ecophysiological responses of homoiochlorophyl- lous and poikilochlorophyllous desiccation tolerant plants: a comparison and ecological per- spective. Plant Growth Regulation 24, 211–217.
Tuba, Z., Proctor, M.C.F. and Takács, Z. (1999) Desiccation-tolerant plants under elevated air CO2: a review. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C 54, 788–796. Valladares, F. (1994) Texture and hygroscopic features of the upper surface of the thallus in the lichen family Umbilicariaceae. Annals of Botany 73, 493–500. Velten, J. and Oliver, M.J. (2001) Tr288: a rehydrin with a dehydrin twist. Plant Molecular Biology 45, 713–722. Vertucci, C.W. and Farrant, J.M. (1995) Acquisition and loss of desiccation-tolerance. In: Kigel, J. and Galili, G. (eds) Seed Development and Germination. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 237–271. Vertucci, C.W. and Leopold, A.C. (1986) Physiological activities associated with hydration levels in seeds. In: Leopold, A.C. (ed.) Membranes, Metabolism and Dry Organisms. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 35–49. Vierling, E. (1991) The roles of heat shock proteins in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 42, 579–620. Volk, O.H. (1984) Pflanzenvergesellschaftungen mit Riccia-Arten in Südwestafrika (Namibia). Vegetatio 55, 57–64. Walters, C. (1998) Understanding the mechanisms and kinetics of seed aging. Seed Science Research 8, 223–244. Webster, B.D. and Leopold, A.C. (1977) The ultrastructure of dry and imbibed cotyledons of soybean. American Journal of Botany 64, 1286–1293. Wehmeyer, N., Hernandez, L.D., Finkelstein, R.R. and Vierling, E. (1996) Synthesis of small heat shock proteins is part of the developmental program of late seed maturation. Plant Physiology 112, 747–757. Williams, R.J. and Leopold, A.C. (1989) The glassy state in maize embryos. Plant Physiology 89, 977–981. Williams, T.G. and Flanagan, L.B. (1998) Measuring and modelling environmental influences on pho- tosynthetic gas exchange in Sphagnum and Pleurozium. Plant, Cell and Environment 21, 555–564. Wilson, A.T., Vickers, M. and Mann, L.R.B. (1979) Metabolism in dry pollen – a novel technique for studying anhydrobiosis. Naturwissenschaften 66, 53–54. Wolkers, W.F. (1998) The role of macromolecular stability in desiccation tolerance. PhD thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands. Wolkers, W.F., Oldenhof, H., Alberda, M. and Hoekstra, F.A. (1998) A fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy study of sugar glasses: application to anhydrobiotic higher plant cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1379, 83–96. 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 43
Drying Without Dying 43
Wood, A.J. and Oliver, M.J. (1999) Translational control in plant stress: the formation of messenger ribonucleoprotein particles (mRNPs) in response to desiccation of Tortula ruralis gametophytes. The Plant Journal 18, 359–370. Wood, A.J., Duff, R.J. and Oliver, M.J. (1999) Expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from desiccated Tortula ruralis identify a large number of novel plant genes. Plant and Cell Physiology 40, 361–368. Wood, J.N. and Gaff, D.F. (1989) Salinity studies with drought resistant Sporobolus species. Oecologia 78, 559–564. Xu, D., Duan, X., Wang, B., Hong, B., Ho, T.-H.D. and Wu, R. (1996) Expression of a late embryogene- sis abundant protein gene, HVA1, from barley confers tolerance to water deficit and salt stress in transgenic rice. Plant Physiology 110, 249–257. Zimmermann, M.H. and Butin, H. (1973) Untersuchungen über die Hitze- und Trockenresistenz holzbewohnender Piltze. Flora 162, 393–419. 01 Desiccation -Chap 1 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 44 02 Dessication - Chap 2 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 45
Part II
Methodology 02 Dessication - Chap 2 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 46 02 Dessication - Chap 2 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 47
2 Methods for the Study of Water Relations Under Desiccation Stress
Wendell Q. Sun Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260
2.1. Introduction 48 2.2. Expression of Water Status 48 2.2.1. Mass-based measures for tissue hydration 48 2.2.1.1. Water content 48 2.2.1.2. Relative water content 49 2.2.2. Thermodynamic measures for tissue hydration 50 2.2.2.1. Water activity 50 2.2.2.2. Chemical potential of water and water potential 51 2.3. Measurement of Tissue Water Potential 53 2.3.1. Psychrometric and hydrometric methods 53 2.3.2. Osmometric or cryoscopic method 54 2.3.3. Isothermal equilibrium method 55 2.4. Water Relations – the Thermodynamic Approach 55 2.4.1. The Höfler diagram and pressure–volume curve 55 2.4.1.1. Change of cell turgor pressure during desiccation 55 2.4.1.2. Change of osmotic potential during desiccation 57 2.4.1.3. The volume of water in symplast, apoplast and intercellular spaces 57 2.4.1.4. Volumetric elasticity of the cell wall 59 2.4.2. Analysis of water sorption isotherms 60 2.4.2.1. Theoretical models 60 2.4.2.2. Temperature dependency of water sorption 62 2.4.2.3. Monolayer hydration and water-clustering function 65 2.4.2.4. Occupancy of water-binding sites 66 2.5. Measurement of Drying Rate and Desiccation Stress 68 2.5.1. Driving force for water loss and expression of drying rate 68 2.5.2. Quantification of desiccation stress 68 2.6. Water Relations – the Kinetic and Functional Approach 70 2.6.1. General considerations 72
© CAB International 2002. Desiccation and Survival in Plants: Drying Without Dying (eds M. Black and H.W. Pritchard) 47 02 Dessication - Chap 2 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 48
48 W.Q. Sun
2.6.1.1. Time scale 72 2.6.1.2. Structural complexity and dynamics of molecular ordering 72 2.6.1.3. The model-dependent interpretation: the pitfalls 73 2.6.2. Biophysical techniques 74 2.6.2.1. Differential scanning calorimetry 74 2.6.2.2. Thermally stimulated current (TSC) method 75 2.6.2.3. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) 76 2.6.2.4. Electron spin resonance 77 2.7. Concluding Remarks 78 2.8. References 79 Appendix 84
2.1. Introduction of water relations that are directly related to desiccation tolerance of plant tissues will be In hydrated plant cells, water is the main introduced. The strengths and limitations of constituent. The organization of cellular various methods or techniques of measure- structures (both supramolecular assemblies ment of water relations during desiccation and micromolecular structures) and the over- will be discussed. An effort will be made to all biochemistry (the thermodynamics of bio- give a basic understanding of terms and logical processes and their rate parameters) of concepts concerning cellular water status an organism depend on water. Water is a sol- and the expression of dehydration stress. vent and a medium in which diffusion of solutes and biochemical reactions take place in plant cells. It is often a participant and/or 2.2. Expression of Water Status a product of various biochemical reactions. In low-moisture systems such as naturally The most important quantity that has to be dried pollen grains and plant seeds, cellular measured in all studies of desiccation toler- water also plays an important role as a plasti- ance is the degree of dehydration stress. So cizer, influencing the translational or rota- far, there is no agreed parameter of dehydra- tional motions of entire molecules, or tion stress measurement. The change in segments of macromolecules and intramolec- water content of plant tissues and organs is ular motions. Water is involved in virtually often used as an indicator of dehydration. every dynamic process in a living cell. However, insufficient attention has been The loss of water from plant cells is an paid to problems commonly associated with important environmental stress. Changes in the use of water content as an indicator of the aqueous environment influence the dehydration stress. For example, different complex thermodynamics and kinetics of concepts and approaches are currently used structural stability and all aspects of biologi- by research groups working on biological cal functions. The accurate measurement of systems, ranging from bacteria and fungal the status of cellular water is essential for spores to microscopic animals, pollen the study of both desiccation stress in plants grains, large seeds and resurrection plants. and the mechanisms of plant desiccation tolerance. The method of quantification and 2.2.1. Mass-based measures for tissue interpretation must be applicable not just to hydration the narrowly defined desiccation condi- tions, but also to all other types of physio- 2.2.1.1. Water content logical stresses with a dehydration component, such as freezing and salinity. In Water content on a wet-weight basis (WC, % this chapter, several fundamental principles w.b.) is widely used in the literature of desic- 02 Dessication - Chap 2 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 49
Methods for Studying Water Relations Under Stress 49
cation studies, and is adopted by the WC (g g 1 dw) = WC (% w.b.)/[100 – WC International Seed Testing Association (% w.b.)] (3) (ISTA, 1993) for the expression of seed water content. WC (% w.b.) is the percentage mass 2.2.1.2. Relative water content fraction of water of the total tissue mass: Relative water content (RWC) is another WC (% w.b.) = (fresh weight dry mass-based parameter. RWC is widely used weight)/fresh weight 100 (1) in the pressure–volume analysis of plant WC (% w.b.) is not a linear expression of tissue water stress. RWC is a simple and water content in tissues, because fresh useful measure of the extent to which a tis- weight appears in both the numerator term sue is in water deficit. It is related to tissue
and the denominator term in Equation (1). water content at full turgor (WCF). During a When WC (% w.b.) is used to monitor the dehydration experiment, RWC is calcu- loss of water during desiccation, the lated by dividing water content at a given decrease of WC (% w.b.) does not necessar- time by water content at full turgor, and ily reflect the exact extent of dehydration expressed as a fraction value or as a per- stress. The change of WC (% w.b.) during centage. If water content in the tissue is drying is, in fact, related to the change of determined as WC (g g 1 dw), the calcula- the reciprocal of tissue fresh weight. For tion of RWC is straightforward, being example, when the tissue of 80% WC (% WC/WCF. But, if water content is deter- w.b.) is dried to 70% and 60% water con- mined as WC (% w.b.), RWC is calculated tent, the tissue actually loses 41.7% and by the equation: 62.5% of its initial water quantity, respec- RWC = [WC (100 – WC )]/[WC tively, not just 12.5% and 25% reduction as F F (100 – WC)] 100 (4) implied by the values of WC (% w.b.). The quantity of water lost during dehydration RWC is a linear expression of moisture from 80% to 70% WC (% w.b.) is twice as condition. The change in RWC over time much as water loss during dehydration serves as a good indicator for the rate of from 70% to 60% WC (% w.b.). dehydration. Physiological responses of Water content on a dry-weight basis mea- plant water deficit are highly correlated sures the mass ratio between water and the with RWC (Sinclair and Ludlow, 1985). The dry mass in tissues, and is often expressed use of RWC is particularly advantageous for by g water per g dry weight (i.e. g g 1 dw): comparative studies, in which initial water content at full turgor or full hydration WC (g g 1 dw) = (fresh weight dry varies considerably among different weight)/dry weight (2) species, different tissues of the same WC (g g 1 dw) is a linear expression of species or the same tissue at different water content, and the change of WC (g g 1 developmental stages, such as seeds. In cer- dw) during drying is proportional to the tain cases, it may be even preferred over loss of water in a tissue. On the mass basis, water potential, because RWC also accounts a tissue with a WC of 0.20 g g 1 dw is for the effect of osmotic adjustment in hydrated exactly twice as much as the tis- affecting plant water status. For example, sue with a WC of 0.10 g g 1 dw, and four- two plants with the same leaf water poten- fold as much as the sample with a WC of tial can have different RWCs if they differ 0.05 g g 1 dw. For this reason, some in their ability for osmotic adjustment. researchers have argued that WC (g g 1 dw) In many desiccation studies on higher is a more sensible expression than WC (% plants, water content of a tissue at full tur- w.b.) for the measurement of dehydration. gor was not specifically determined, and At WC < 15%, the difference between WC instead water content after full hydration in (% w.b.) and WC (g g 1 dw) is fairly small. water was used. Typically, leaf samples (e.g. WC (% w.b.) is converted to WC (g g 1 dw) discs or sections) of higher plant species using the following equation: are taken and weighed immediately. The 02 Dessication - Chap 2 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 50
50 W.Q. Sun
samples are then hydrated in distilled based parameters for the expression of water for 4–6 h, after which they are dehydration stress has been shown by a weighed again and their water contents are number of studies. The critical onset water determined by drying the samples in an potential of Quercus rubra (Pritchard, 1991) oven. In higher plants, the amount of inter- and Quercus robur (Pritchard and Manger, cellular water is small or non-existent 1998) is about –3 MPa, but the correspond- (Oertli, 1989). However, it should be noted ing mass water contents vary substantially that some plant tissues do contain intercel- due to different seed oil content. Sun and lular water, which is held in spaces Gouk (1999) studied the water relation between cells of a tissue at relatively high responses of three recalcitrant (desiccation- water potential (near zero). Therefore, water sensitive) seeds (Aesculus hippocastanum, content at full turgor has different physio- Andira inermis, Q. rubra) during controlled logical meaning from water content of the dehydration. The critical water potentials tissue at full hydration when the tissue con- for seeds are quite similar for all three tains intercellular water. If intercellular species ( 7 to 8 MPa), but their corre- water is present, water content of the tissue sponding critical water contents are 0.45, at full turgor has to be estimated from the 1.10 and 0.35 g g 1 dw for A. hippocas- plot of water potential on water content (g tanum, A. inermis and Q. rubra, respec- g 1 dw). To determine the water content of tively. If the critical water content were the tissue at full turgor, two linear regres- used to express the relative desiccation tol- sion lines can be fitted, respectively, with erance, one would conclude incorrectly data points where water potential remains that seeds of A. hippocastanum and Q. almost unchanged during initial water loss rubra are much more desiccation-tolerant and the next few points where water poten- than seeds of A. inermis. Therefore, a mass- tial starts to fall. The intercept of these two based parameter of water loss may not be a regression lines gives the water content at reliable indicator for the degree of desicca- full turgor. Beckett (1997) reported that the tion stress in plant tissues. amount of intercellular water varied greatly among species of bryophytes. If intercellu- lar water exists in a tissue, correction needs 2.2.2. Thermodynamic measures for tissue to be made to the raw RWC readings, which hydration are calculated according to the water con- tent at full hydration. The method used to The response of plant tissues to desiccation correct the raw RWC readings was is related to the thermodynamic and described in detail by Beckett (1997). kinetic status of tissue water, rather than to There are shortcomings in using mass- actual water content. The water status of based parameters for the expression of plant tissues can be expressed in terms of water content. Plant tissues are heteroge- energy status of water molecules, i.e. the neous, complex biological systems, in partial molar Gibbs’ free energy or water which carbohydrates, proteins and lipids potential. This thermodynamic approach is and other components have different hydra- preferred to the mass-based expression of tion properties. As a consequence, when tissue hydration, because thermodynamic plant tissues of various species are equili- parameters (i.e. energy status) are related brated under given conditions of tempera- directly to the numerous biophysical and ture and relative humidity, equilibrium physiological events that contribute to des- water content varies considerably among iccation stresses and desiccation tolerance species. For example, seeds with large lipid of plant tissues. reserves equilibrate to lower water contents than starchy seeds, even though the chemi- 2.2.2.1. Water activity cal potential of water molecules is the same
for all tissues when equilibrium is Water activity (aw) is used to describe achieved. The disadvantage of using mass- water status in the studies of desiccation 02 Dessication - Chap 2 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 51
Methods for Studying Water Relations Under Stress 51
tolerance and storage survival for spores, In such cases, the measured vapour pres- pollen, seeds and resurrection plants (Ellis sure of water may not be the equilibrium et al., 1990, 1991; Berjak and Pammenter, vapour pressure, but the vapour pressure of 1994; Vertucci et al., 1994, 1995; Walters, a ‘stationary’ state that is time-dependent. 1998a). Water activity is measured as the However, studies in food sciences have ratio of the vapour pressure of water in a suggested that water activities measured system to the vapour pressure of pure are likely to be close to equilibrium and the water at the same temperature. It is related differences should be within the uncer- to the equilibrium relative humidity (RH) tainty associated with the experimental of the air surrounding the system (i.e. RH = determination (Chirife and Buera, 1996). aw 100). Water activity can be viewed as The usefulness of the water activity con- the ‘effective’ water content, which is ther- cept in seed storage stability has been dis- modynamically available to various physi- cussed by Walters (1998b). ological processes in cells. For the survival of organisms under water stress, the ‘effec- 2.2.2.2. Chemical potential of water and tive’ water is more important than the total water potential amount of water present in the tissue. Water activity of fresh plant tissues may The quantity of free energy of a component
vary only between 0.980 and 0.996. Within (µj) in a system is measured by its chemical this narrow range, it is not useful for the potential. The chemical potential of water expression of dehydration stress or tissue (µw) in a system is defined by: water status. However, for the studies of – µ = µ* + RT ln a + V P + z FE + m gh (5) severe water stress and extreme desicca- w w w w w w
tion, water activity has several advantages where µ*w is the chemical potential of pure over water content, including its concep- water at ideal reference conditions. The
tual simplicity, measurability, easy experi- second term RT ln aw is for water activity. R mental manipulation, and its applicability is the gas constant (8.314 10 3 kJ mol 1 to both simple and complex systems. A K 1), T is the absolute temperature (K, in number of physiological processes that are kelvin), and a is water activity (RH/100). – w relevant to desiccation tolerance or damage Vw is the partial molal volume of water (i.e. have been shown to occur at specific water the differential increase or decrease in vol- activities, and some of those are presented ume when a differential amount of water is – in Fig. 2.1. added or removed). Vw is influenced by the Water activity in plant tissues can be presence of solutes and is also tempera- determined using the hygrometric method ture-dependent (1.805 10 5 m3 mol 1 at and the isothermal equilibrium sorption 20°C). P is the hydrostatic pressure on method. The hygrometric instrument water in excess of atmospheric pressure 3 3 – method directly measures the equilibrium (MPa, 1 MPa = 10 kJ m ). The term VwP RH of plant tissues in a closed chamber. represents the effect of pressure on the With the equilibrium sorption method, chemical potential of water and is samples of plant tissues are equilibrated to expressed in energy per mole (kJ mol 1).
a series of known water activities at a spec- zwFE is the electrochemical potential of ified temperature. The relationship water, which equals zero because water is
between water content and water activity uncharged (zw = 0). The last term mwgh is upon equilibrium (i.e. the sorption the gravitational term, representing the isotherm curve) is then used to calculate work needed to move 1 mole of water to a
water activity of plant tissues at different given height. Practically, mwgh will remain water contents. Water activity is defined at constant in most circumstances of desicca- equilibrium. However, plant tissues at low tion studies. and intermediate moisture levels may not The water potential is proportional to be in a true state of equilibrium at all, but the chemical potential of water (µw µ*w) in in an amorphous metastable state instead. a system as described in Equation (5). 02 Dessication - Chap 2 18/3/02 1:53 pm Page 52
52 W.Q. Sun