Protocol Update #09 ALLIANCE for CLINICAL TRIALS in ONCOLOGY
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Restoration of Temozolomide Sensitivity by PARP Inhibitors In
Published OnlineFirst January 3, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2000 CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH | TRANSLATIONAL CANCER MECHANISMS AND THERAPY Restoration of Temozolomide Sensitivity by PARP Inhibitors in Mismatch Repair Deficient Glioblastoma is Independent of Base Excision Repair Fumi Higuchi1,2, Hiroaki Nagashima1, Jianfang Ning1,3, Mara V.A. Koerner1, Hiroaki Wakimoto1, and Daniel P. Cahill1 ABSTRACT ◥ Purpose: Emergence of mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is a Results: While having no detectable effect in MSH6 wild-type frequent mechanism of acquired resistance to the alkylating che- GBMs, PARPi selectively restored TMZ sensitivity in MSH6- motherapeutic temozolomide (TMZ) in gliomas. Poly(ADP-ribose) deficient GBM cells. This genotype-specific restoration of activity polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have been shown to potentiate TMZ translated in vivo, where combination treatment of veliparib cytotoxicity in several cancer types, including gliomas. We tested and TMZ showed potent suppression of tumor growth of whether PARP inhibition could re-sensitize MSH6-null MMR- MSH6-inactivated orthotopic xenografts, compared with TMZ deficient gliomas to TMZ, and assessed the role of the base excision monotherapy. Unlike PARPi, genetic and pharmacological block- repair (BER) DNA damage repair pathway in PARPi-mediated age of BER pathway did not re-sensitize MSH6-inactivated GBM effects. cells to TMZ. Similarly, CRISPR PARP1 knockout did not re- Methods: Isogenic pairs of MSH6 wild-type and MSH6-inacti- sensitize MSH6-inactivated GBM cells to TMZ. vated human glioblastoma (GBM) cells (including both IDH1/2 Conclusions: PARPi restoration of TMZ chemosensitivity in wild-type and IDH1 mutant), as well as MSH6-null cells derived MSH6-inactivated glioma represents a promising strategy to from a patient with recurrent GBM were treated with TMZ, the overcome acquired chemoresistance caused by MMR deficiency. -
PARP1 Trapping by PARP Inhibitors Drives Cytotoxicity Both in Cancer Cells and Healthy Bone Marrow
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on November 14, 2018; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-18-0138 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. 1 Title: PARP1 trapping by PARP inhibitors drives cytotoxicity both in cancer 2 cells and healthy bone marrow 3 4 Authors: Todd A. Hopkins, William B. Ainsworth, Paul A. Ellis, Cherrie K. 5 Donawho, Enrico L. DiGiammarino, Sanjay C. Panchal, Vivek C. 6 Abraham, Mikkel A. Algire, Yan Shi, Amanda M. Olson, Eric F. Johnson, 7 Julie L. Wilsbacher, David Maag* 8 9 Author affiliations: AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, USA 10 Running title: PARP trapping: impact on in vivo activity of PARP inhibitors 11 Keywords: PARP, DNA damage, veliparib,talazoparib, rucaparib, A-934935 12 Financial support: This work was financially supported by AbbVie, Inc. 13 Corresponding author: *David Maag, Oncology Development, AbbVie, Inc., 1 N. Waukegan 14 Road, North Chicago, Illinois, USA 60064. Phone: 847-937-3969; E- 15 mail: [email protected]. 16 Disclosure: All authors are employees of AbbVie. The design, study conduct, and 17 financial support for this research were provided by AbbVie. AbbVie 18 participated in the interpretation of data, review, and approval of the 19 publication. 20 Word count: 5163/5000 21 Total number of figures and tables: 12 (6 plus 6 supplemental) 22 1 Downloaded from mcr.aacrjournals.org on September 26, 2021. © 2018 American Association for Cancer Research. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on November 14, 2018; DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-18-0138 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. -
Research in Your Backyard Developing Cures, Creating Jobs
Research in Your Backyard Developing Cures, Creating Jobs PHARMACEUTICAL CLINICAL TRIALS IN ILLINOIS Dots show locations of clinical trials in the state. Executive Summary This report shows that biopharmaceutical research com- Quite often, biopharmaceutical companies hire local panies continue to be vitally important to the economy research institutions to conduct the tests and in Illinois, and patient health in Illinois, despite the recession. they help to bolster local economies in communities all over the state, including Chicago, Decatur, Joliet, Peoria, At a time when the state still faces significant economic Quincy, Rock Island, Rockford and Springfield. challenges, biopharmaceutical research companies are conducting or have conducted more than 4,300 clinical For patients, the trials offer another potential therapeutic trials of new medicines in collaboration with the state’s option. Clinical tests may provide a new avenue of care for clinical research centers, university medical schools and some chronic disease sufferers who are still searching for hospitals. Of the more than 4,300 clinical trials, 2,334 the medicines that are best for them. More than 470 of the target or have targeted the nation’s six most debilitating trials underway in Illinois are still recruiting patients. chronic diseases—asthma, cancer, diabetes, heart dis- ease, mental illnesses and stroke. Participants in clinical trials can: What are Clinical Trials? • Play an active role in their health care. • Gain access to new research treatments before they In the development of new medicines, clinical trials are are widely available. conducted to prove therapeutic safety and effectiveness and compile the evidence needed for the Food and Drug • Obtain expert medical care at leading health care Administration to approve treatments. -
Horizon Scanning Status Report June 2019
Statement of Funding and Purpose This report incorporates data collected during implementation of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Health Care Horizon Scanning System, operated by ECRI Institute under contract to PCORI, Washington, DC (Contract No. MSA-HORIZSCAN-ECRI-ENG- 2018.7.12). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its content. No statement in this report should be construed as an official position of PCORI. An intervention that potentially meets inclusion criteria might not appear in this report simply because the horizon scanning system has not yet detected it or it does not yet meet inclusion criteria outlined in the PCORI Health Care Horizon Scanning System: Horizon Scanning Protocol and Operations Manual. Inclusion or absence of interventions in the horizon scanning reports will change over time as new information is collected; therefore, inclusion or absence should not be construed as either an endorsement or rejection of specific interventions. A representative from PCORI served as a contracting officer’s technical representative and provided input during the implementation of the horizon scanning system. PCORI does not directly participate in horizon scanning or assessing leads or topics and did not provide opinions regarding potential impact of interventions. Financial Disclosure Statement None of the individuals compiling this information have any affiliations or financial involvement that conflicts with the material presented in this report. Public Domain Notice This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without special permission. Citation of the source is appreciated. All statements, findings, and conclusions in this publication are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) or its Board of Governors. -
Table of Contents
NTICANCER ESEARCH InternationalA Journal of Cancer ResearchR and Treatment ISSN: 0250-7005 Volume 24, Number 4, July-August 2004 Contents Experimental Studies Inhibition of the Human Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Endonuclease (Ape1) Repair Activity and Sensitization of Breast Cancer Cells to DNA Alkylating Agents with Lucanthone. M. LUO, M.R. KELLEY (Indianapolis, Indiana, USA)........................................................................................................................................................... 2127 Androgen Withdrawal Inhibits Tumor Growth and is Associated with Decrease in Angiogenesis and VEGF Expression in Androgen-Independent CWR22Rv1 Human Prostate Cancer Model. L. CHENG, S. ZHANG, C.J. SWEENEY, C. KAO, T.A GARDNER, J.N. EBLE (Indianapolis, Indiana, USA) .................................. 2135 In Vitro Generation of Cytolytic T Cells Against Human Melanoma Cells Overexpressing HDM2. A. SORURI, A. FAYYAZI, S. GANGL, C. GRIESINGER, C.A. ALBRECHT, T. SCHLOTT (Goettingen; Langen, Germany) .................................................................................................................................................... 2141 Artemisinin: An Alternative Treatment for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. E. YAMACHIKA, T. HABTE, D. ODA (Seattle, WA, USA; Okayama City, Japan).............................................................................................. 2153 S19-mRNA Expression in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Upper Aerodigestive Tract. V. SENGPIEL, T. ROST, T. GÖRÖGH, I.O. RATHCKE, J.A. -
Individualized Systems Medicine Strategy to Tailor Treatments for Patients with Chemorefractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Published OnlineFirst September 20, 2013; DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0350 RESEARCH ARTICLE Individualized Systems Medicine Strategy to Tailor Treatments for Patients with Chemorefractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Tea Pemovska 1 , Mika Kontro 2 , Bhagwan Yadav 1 , Henrik Edgren 1 , Samuli Eldfors1 , Agnieszka Szwajda 1 , Henrikki Almusa 1 , Maxim M. Bespalov 1 , Pekka Ellonen 1 , Erkki Elonen 2 , Bjørn T. Gjertsen5 , 6 , Riikka Karjalainen 1 , Evgeny Kulesskiy 1 , Sonja Lagström 1 , Anna Lehto 1 , Maija Lepistö1 , Tuija Lundán 3 , Muntasir Mamun Majumder 1 , Jesus M. Lopez Marti 1 , Pirkko Mattila 1 , Astrid Murumägi 1 , Satu Mustjoki 2 , Aino Palva 1 , Alun Parsons 1 , Tero Pirttinen 4 , Maria E. Rämet 4 , Minna Suvela 1 , Laura Turunen 1 , Imre Västrik 1 , Maija Wolf 1 , Jonathan Knowles 1 , Tero Aittokallio 1 , Caroline A. Heckman 1 , Kimmo Porkka 2 , Olli Kallioniemi 1 , and Krister Wennerberg 1 ABSTRACT We present an individualized systems medicine (ISM) approach to optimize cancer drug therapies one patient at a time. ISM is based on (i) molecular profi ling and ex vivo drug sensitivity and resistance testing (DSRT) of patients’ cancer cells to 187 oncology drugs, (ii) clinical implementation of therapies predicted to be effective, and (iii) studying consecutive samples from the treated patients to understand the basis of resistance. Here, application of ISM to 28 samples from patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) uncovered fi ve major taxonomic drug-response sub- types based on DSRT profi les, some with distinct genomic features (e.g., MLL gene fusions in subgroup IV and FLT3 -ITD mutations in subgroup V). Therapy based on DSRT resulted in several clinical responses. -
Draft COMP Agenda 16-18 January 2018
12 January 2018 EMA/COMP/818236/2017 Inspections, Human Medicines Pharmacovigilance and Committees Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP) Draft agenda for the meeting on 16-18 January 2018 Chair: Bruno Sepodes – Vice-Chair: Lesley Greene 16 January 2018, 09:00-19:30, room 2F 17 January 2018, 08:30-19:30, room 2F 18 January 2018, 08:30-18:30, room 2F Health and safety information In accordance with the Agency’s health and safety policy, delegates are to be briefed on health, safety and emergency information and procedures prior to the start of the meeting. Disclaimers Some of the information contained in this agenda is considered commercially confidential or sensitive and therefore not disclosed. With regard to intended therapeutic indications or procedure scopes listed against products, it must be noted that these may not reflect the full wording proposed by applicants and may also vary during the course of the review. Additional details on some of these procedures will be published in the COMP meeting reports once the procedures are finalised. Of note, this agenda is a working document primarily designed for COMP members and the work the Committee undertakes. Note on access to documents Some documents mentioned in the agenda cannot be released at present following a request for access to documents within the framework of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 as they are subject to on- going procedures for which a final decision has not yet been adopted. They will become public when adopted or considered public according to the principles stated in the Agency policy on access to documents (EMA/127362/2006). -
Induction of Concentration-Dependent Blockade in the G2 Phase of the Cell Cycle by Cancer Chemotherapeutic Agents1
[CANCER RESEARCH 38, 809-814, March 1978] Induction of Concentration-dependent Blockade in the G2 Phase of the Cell Cycle by Cancer Chemotherapeutic Agents1 Bruce F. Kimler,2 Martin H. Schneiderman,3 and Dennis B. Leeper Laboratory of Experimental Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Therapy and Nuclear Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ABSTRACT for detailed analysis. Thus, results have been limited to describing the location of a block in terms of general The mitotic cell selection procedure for cell cycle anal phases of the cell cycle, i.e., G,, S, G,,, M, or at the ysis was utilized with Chinese hamster ovary fibroblasts boundary between 2 phases. Even when greater precision to determine the transition points in G,, i.e., the age in G, was attained, seldom was a concentration dependence of at which cells become refractory to drug-induced progres the location of the block observed (29). sion blockade, for several cancer Chemotherapeutic Using the mitotic cell selection procedure for cell cycle agents and antimetabolites over a 1000-fold concentration analysis (26), we have determined the number of cells range. refractory to drug-induced G-,blockade after treatment with The G transition points for five anticancer drugs (acti- various concentrations of several cancer Chemotherapeutic nomycin D, Adriamycin, lucanthone, mitomycin C, and agents and antimetabolites. We were able to calculate the bleomycin) varied linearly as a function of the logarithm time in G2 at which a particular concentration of drug of the drug concentration between the S-G_,boundary at inhibited progression or induced a delay. low concentrations and prometaphase (45 min prior to the end of karyokinesis) at high concentrations. -
WO 2013/061161 A2 2 May 2013 (02.05.2013) P O P C T
(12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2013/061161 A2 2 May 2013 (02.05.2013) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A61K 31/337 (2006.01) A61K 31/48 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A61K 31/395 (2006.01) A61K 31/51 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, A61K 31/4174 (2006.01) A61K 31/549 (2006.01) BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, A61K 31/428 (2006.01) A61K 31/663 (2006.01) DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, (21) International Application Number: KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, PCT/IB20 12/002768 ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, (22) International Filing Date: NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, 25 October 2012 (25.10.2012) RW, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, (25) Filing Language: English ZM, ZW. (26) Publication Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (30) Priority Data: kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, 61/552,922 28 October 201 1 (28. -
A Phase I Clinical Trial of the Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor Veliparib And
Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on November 14, 2017; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1590 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. A Phase I Clinical Trial of the Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor Veliparib and Weekly Topotecan in Patients with Solid Tumors 1 2 1 Andrea E. Wahner Hendrickson* , Michael E. Menefee* , Lynn C. Hartmann , Harry J. 1 3 1 1 Long , Donald W. Northfelt , Joel M. Reid , Felix Boakye-Agyeman , Olumide Kayode1, 1 5 Karen S. Flatten , Maria I. Harrell4, Elizabeth M. Swisher4, Guy G. Poirer , Daniel 1 1 1 Satele , Jake Allred , Janet L. Lensing , Alice Chen6, Jiuping Ji6, Yiping Zang6, 1 1,7 1 Charles Erlichman** , Paul Haluska** , and Scott H. Kaufmann** 1 2 3 Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Ponte Vedra, FL; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale 5 AZ; 4University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Université Laval, Québec QC; and 6DCTD NCI, Bethesda, MD. 7Present address: Merck, White Horse Plains, NJ * Indicates co-first authorship. ** indicates co-senior authorship Running Title: Phase I Trial of Veliparib and Weekly Topotecan Corresponding Author: Andrea E. Wahner Hendrickson, M.D. Gonda 19-208 200 First St., S.W. Rochester, MN 55905 e-mail: [email protected] Key Words: Phase I, Veliparib, PARP inhibitors, Topotecan, Solid Tumors, Advanced Malignancies, NCT01012817 Number of Tables and Figures: 6 Word counts: Abstract: 250 Text: 4894 Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest: No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the authors. Downloaded from clincancerres.aacrjournals.org on October 2, 2021. © 2017 American Association for Cancer Research. -
Profile of Veliparib and Its Potential in the Treatment of Solid Tumors Lars M
University of Kentucky UKnowledge Pediatrics Faculty Publications Pediatrics 7-29-2015 Profile of Veliparib and Its Potential in the Treatment of Solid Tumors Lars M. Wagner University of Kentucky, [email protected] Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits oy u. Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/pediatrics_facpub Part of the Pediatrics Commons Repository Citation Wagner, Lars M., "Profile of Veliparib and Its Potential in the Treatment of Solid Tumors" (2015). Pediatrics Faculty Publications. 168. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/pediatrics_facpub/168 This Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Pediatrics at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pediatrics Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Profile of eV liparib and Its Potential in the Treatment of Solid Tumors Notes/Citation Information Published in OncoTargets and Therapy, v. 8, p. 1931-1939. © 2015 Wagner. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission -
Access to Cancer Medicines in Australia
Access to cancer medicines in Australia Medicines Australia Oncology Industry Taskforce July 2013 Contents Glossary ..................................................................................................................................... i Executive summary .................................................................................................................... i 1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of this report ....................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Methods ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Report structure ............................................................................................................... 9 2 Cancer in Australia and other countries ......................................................................... 10 2.1 Population statistics on cancer ........................................................................................ 10 2.2 Population impacts of cancer in Australia ........................................................................ 24 2.3 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 33 3 Current and future cancer medicines ............................................................................ 34 3.1 Current