Michael Vecchio, Et Al. V. Huntington Bancshares Incorporated, Et Al
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL VECCHIO, Individually and On Behalf ) of All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. Plaintiff, vs. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES, INC., THOMAS E. HOAGLIN, MARTY E. ADAMS, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED and DONALD R. KIMBLE, Defendants. Plaintiff, Michael Vecchio ("Plaintiff'), alleges the following based upon the investigation by Plaintiffs counsel, which included, among other things, a review of the defendants' public documents, conference calls and announcements made by defendants, United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filings, wire and press releases published by and regarding Huntington Bancshares, Inc. ("Huntington" or the "Company"), securities analysts' reports and advisories about the Company, and information readily available on the Internet, and Plaintiff believes that substantial additional evidentiary support will exist for the allegations set forth herein after a reasonable opportunity for discovery. 1 NATURE OF THE ACTION AND OVERVIEW 1. This is a federal class action on behalf of purchasers of Huntington's securities between July 20, 2007 and November 16, 2007, inclusive (the "Class Period"), seeking to pursue remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") 2. Huntington is a regional bank holding company. It serves as the holding company for The Huntington National Bank ("Huntington National "), which provides commercial and retail financial products and services. On July 1, 2007, Huntington acquired Sky Financial Group, Inc. ("Sky Financial") for $3.3 billion. As a result of the Sky Financial acquisition, the Company began a relationship with Franklin Credit Management Corporation ("Franklin"). 3. On November 16, 2007, the Company shocked investors when it reported its 2007 fourth quarter financial and operating results. For the quarter, the Company stated that it expected to include a charge of up to $300 million, or $0.81 per share, to "replenish and build the allowance for loan and lease losses in support of the Franklin relationship ." Additionally, the Company revealed that its $1.5 billion in loans to Franklin were being reassessed in terms of their "collectability." The Company stated that Franklin had inadequately addressed its loan loss reserves, and that Franklin's mortgages represented the underlying collateral for the Company's loans to Franklin. As a result, the Company reported a significant net loss for the fourth quarter 2007. 4. On this news, the Company's stock declined $1.33 per share, or 8.27 percent, to close on November 16, 2007 at $14.75 per share, on unusually heavy trading volume. 5. The Complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, defendants failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company's financial well-being, business relationships, and prospects. Specifically, defendants failed to disclose or indicate the following: (1) that the 2 Company had failed to adequately and timely record reserves for losses from its exposure to subprime mortgages; (2) that the Company had failed to disclose the extent of its vulnerability to anticipated losses and defaults in its home loan portfolio; (3) that the Company lacked adequate internal and financial controls; and (4) that, as a result of the foregoing, the Company's statements about its financial well-being and future business prospects were lacking in any reasonable basis when made. 6. As a result of defendants' wrongful acts and omissions, and the precipitous decline in the market value of the Company's securities, Plaintiff and other Class Members have suffered significant losses and damages. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 7. The claims asserted herein arise under and pursuant to Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act, (15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b) and 78t(a)), and Rule lOb-5 promulgated thereunder (17 C.F.R. § 240.1Ob-5). 8. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to Section 27 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. § 78aa) and 28 U.S.C. § 1331. 9. Venue is proper in this Judicial District pursuant to Section 27 of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78aa and 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Many of the acts and transactions alleged herein, including the preparation and dissemination of materially false and misleading information, occurred in substantial part in this Judicial District. Additionally, Huntington's principal executive offices are located within this Judicial District. 10. In connection with the acts, conduct and other wrongs alleged in this Complaint, defendants, directly or indirectly, used the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, including but not limited to, the United States mails, interstate telephone communications and 3 the facilities of the national securities exchange. PARTIES 11. Plaintiff, Michael Vecchio, as set forth in the accompanying certification, incorporated by reference herein, purchased Huntington's securities at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period and has been damaged thereby. 12. Defendant Huntington is a Maryland corporation with its principal executive offices located at 41 S. High St., Columbus, Ohio. 13. Defendant Thomas E. Hoaglin ("Hoaglin") was, at all relevant times, the Company's Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chairman of the Board of Directors. 14. Defendant Donald R. Kimble ("Kimble") was, at all relevant times, the Company's Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), Finance Director, Executive Vice President and Controller. 15. Defendant Marty E. Adams ("Adams") was, at all relevant times, the Company's President, Chief Operating Officer ("COO") and a member of the Board of Directors. 16. Defendants Hoaglin, Kimble and Adams are collectively referred to hereinafter as the "Individual Defendants." The Individual Defendants, because of their positions with the Company, possessed the power and authority to control the contents of Huntington's reports to the SEC, press releases and presentations to securities analysts, money and portfolio managers and institutional investors, i.e., the market. Each defendant was provided with copies of the Company's reports and press releases alleged herein to be misleading prior to, or shortly after, their issuance and had the ability and opportunity to prevent their issuance or cause them to be corrected. Because of their positions and access to material non-public information available to them, each of these defendants knew that the adverse facts specified herein had not been 4 disclosed to, and were being concealed from, the public, and that the positive representations which were being made were then materially false and misleading. The Individual Defendants are liable for the false statements pleaded herein, as those statements were each "group- published" information, the result of the collective actions of the Individual Defendants. SUBSTANTIVE ALLEGATIONS Background 17. Huntington is a regional bank holding company located in Columbus, Ohio. Huntington is the holding Company for The Huntington National Bank ("Huntington National"), and provides commercial and retail financial products and services . On July 1, 2007, Huntington acquired Sky Financial Group, Inc. ("Sky Financial") for $3.3 billion. As a result of the merger with Sky Financial, Huntington acquired more than $1.5 billion in exposure to subprime mortgages, but continuously assured investors that the Company was adequately prepared to deal with the deteriorating credit and real estate markets. Materially False and Misleading Statements Issued During the Class Period 18. On July 19, 2007, the Company issued a press release detailing its second quarter 2007 financial results . Therein, the Company, in relevant part, stated: Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (NASDAQ: HBAN; www.huntington .com) reported 2007 second quarter earnings of $80.5 million, or $0.34 per common share. Results in the year-ago second quarter were $ 111.6 million, or $0.46 per common share. Earnings for the first six months of 2007 were $176.2 million, or $0.74 per common share, compared with $216.1 million, or $0.90 per common share, for the comparable year-ago period. Performance compared with the 2007 first quarter included: • $0.34 earnings per common share, down from $0.40 per common share in the prior quarter. 5 • Current quarter results were negatively impacted by higher loan loss provision expense, primarily related to two eastern Michigan credit relationships and one northern Ohio credit ($0.07per common share); expenses related to the merger with Sky Financial Group, Inc. (Sky Financial), which closed July 1, 2007 ($0.02 per common share); and net market-related losses ($0.01 per common share). • 3.27% net interest margin, down from 3.36%. • 12% annualized growth in average total commercial loans. • 4% annualized decline in average total consumer loans. • 13% annualized decline in average residential mortgages, reflecting the sale of $110 million of residential mortgages at the end of the first quarter. • 5% annualized increase in average home equity loans. • 4% annualized decline in average total automobile loans and leases, reflecting a decline in automobile leases, partially offset by strong growth in average automobile loans. • 5% annualized increase in average total core deposits. • 7% annualized growth in average non-interest bearing demand deposits. • 9% annualized growth in average interest bearing demand deposits. • Strong performance in core fee income categories, reflecting 12% growth in service charges on deposits