Archived Content Contenu Archivé
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Virginia Acts of Assembly -- 2021 Special Session I
VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2021 SPECIAL SESSION I CHAPTER 110 An Act to amend and reenact §§ 3.2-4112, 3.2-4113, 3.2-4114.2, 3.2-4115, 3.2-4116, 3.2-4118, 3.2-4119, 18.2-247, 18.2-251.1:3, 54.1-3401, and 54.1-3446 of the Code of Virginia, relating to industrial hemp; emergency. [H 2078] Approved March 12, 2021 Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia: 1. That §§ 3.2-4112, 3.2-4113, 3.2-4114.2, 3.2-4115, 3.2-4116, 3.2-4118, 3.2-4119, 18.2-247, 18.2-251.1:3, 54.1-3401, and 54.1-3446 of the Code of Virginia are amended and reenacted as follows: § 3.2-4112. Definitions. As used in this chapter, unless the context requires a different meaning: "Cannabis sativa product" means a product made from any part of the plant Cannabis sativa, including seeds thereof and any derivative, extract, cannabinoid, isomer, acid, salt, or salt of an isomer, whether growing or not, with a concentration of tetrahydrocannabinol that is greater than that allowed by federal law. "Deal" means to buy temporarily possess industrial hemp grown in compliance with state or federal law and to sell such industrial hemp to a person who that (i) processes industrial hemp in compliance with state or federal law or has not been processed and (ii) sells industrial hemp to a person who processes industrial hemp in compliance with state or federal law was not grown and will not be processed by the person temporarily possessing it. -
Questions & Answers
SERVING CANADIANS Research and Statistics Division questions & answers February 2003 www.canada.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/rs Drug Use and Offending by: Nathalie Quann, Research Analyst Q1. How has drug legislation changed recently? Table of Contents Q1. How has drug legislation changed recently? .................................................1 Since May 1997, the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act governs all drug offences in Canada. Q2. What are the most recent Canadian statistics on drug use? ............................2 Prior to 1997, the two most important federal statutes dealing with Q3. What is the public attitude towards illicit drugs were the Narcotics Control Act (NCA) and the Food and decriminalization of drugs? ...................4 Drugs Act (FDA). The Narcotics Control Act governed over 120 different types of drugs such as cocaine, heroin, opium, and Q4. What do Canadians think about the cannabis. The NCA did not distinguish one drug from another. For medical use of soft drugs? ......................5 example, cannabis and cocaine offenders were subject to the same Q5. How is the health care system affected criminal procedures and penalties. The Food and Drugs Act governed by drug use and abuse? ..........................5 the regulation of pharmaceutical drugs, food, cosmetics, and medical devices. Two parts most specifically dealt with the non-medical use Q6. How many drug offences were reported of specific drugs: Part III governed "controlled drugs" (such as by the police in 2000? ............................6 amphetamines, barbiturates, testosterone) while Part IV governed Q7. Are offenders always charged by the "restricted drugs" (such as LSD, and other hallucinogenic drugs). police when drugs are involved? ...........7 The maximum penalties were less strict under the FDA than the NCA. -
Food and Drug Act Cap F. 32
FOOD AND DRUGS ACT Cap. F. 32 LFN 2004 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Food, drugs, cosmetics and devices 1. Prohibition of sale of certain food, drugs, cosmetic and devices. 2. Prohibition of sale or advertisement of food, etc., as treatment, etc., for certain diseases. 3. Prohibition of importation, exportation, distribution, etc., of specified drugs. 4. Power of Minister to obtain particulars in respect of certain substances. 5. Prohibition of various misleading practices. 6. Manufacture, etc., of food, etc., under insanitary conditions. 7. Minister's certificate for manufacture, etc., of drugs specified in the Fourth or Fifth Schedule. 8. Declaration by manufacturer. 9. Designation of inspecting officers and analysts. 10. Powers of inspecting officers. 11. False statement. 12. Obstruction of inspecting officers. 13. Power of inspecting officers on importation of food, etc. Forfeiture 14. Forfeiture. Advisory Council 15. Food and Drugs Advisory Council. Regulations 16. Regulations. Penalties and legal proceedings 17. Penalties. 18. Trial of offences. 19. Defence in proceedings for sale of food, etc. 20. Certificates and presumptions. General 21. Interpretation. 22. Short title. SCHEDULES FIRST SCHEDULE Diseases, etc., referred to in section 2 SECOND SCHEDULE Drugs referred to in section 3 THIRD SCHEDULE Publications referred to in section 5 FOURTH SCHEDULE Drugs referred to in section 7 (1 ) FIFTH SCHEDULE Drugs referred to in section 7 (2) FOOD AND DRUGS ACT An Act to make provision for the regulation of the manufacture, sale and advertisement of food, drugs, cosmetics and devices and repeal the existing State laws on those matters. [10th February, 1976] [Commencement.] Food, drugs, cosmetics and devices 1. -
Laws and Regulations Promulgated to Give Effect to the Provisions of the International Treaties on Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances
UNITED NATIONS E/NL.1980/45-48* 12 November I984 ENGLISH ONLY Original: ENGLISH AND LAWS AND REGULATIONS PROMULGATED TO GIVE EFFECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL TREATIES ON NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES In accordance with the relevant articles of the international treaties on narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, the Secretary-General has the honour to communicate the following legislative texts. CANADA Communicated "by the Government of Canada NOTE BY THE SECRETARIAT a) Internationa! non-proprietary names in the text have been underlined by the Secretariat. b) Some editing of texts may be done by the Secretariat in the interest of clarity. In this connection, words in square brackets [ ] have been added or changed by the Secretariat. c) Only passages directly relevant to the control of narcotic drugs or psycho• tropic substances have been reproduced in thjs document. Non-relevant parts of laws and regulations have been deleted by the Secretariat; such deletions are indicated by [...]. INDEX Page E/NL.1980/45 Narcotic Control Act, amended by 1978-79 1 E/NL.1980/46 Narcotic Control Regulations, amended by P.C. 1978-444 16 E/NL.1980/47 Food and Drugs Act, amended by 1976-77 37 E/NL.1980/48 Food and Drugs Regulations, amended by C.R.C. 870, Part G 54 and P.C. 1979-2831, Part J Office Consolidation E/NL.1980/45 February 1980 NARCOTIC CONTROL ACT 1/ Amended 1978-79 CHAPTER N-l AN ACT TO PROVIDE FOR THE CONTROL OF NARCOTIC DRUGS Short Title 1. This Act may be cited as the Narcotic Control Act. -
INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATIVE EXERCISES (ICE) Summary Report
INTERNATIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMME (IQAP) INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATIVE EXERCISES (ICE) Summary Report SEIZED MATERIALS 2017/2 INTERNATIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMME (IQAP) INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATIVE EXERCISES (ICE) Table of contents Introduction 3 Page Comments from the International Panel of Forensic Experts Page 3 NPS reported by ICE participants Page 5 Codes and Abbreviations Page 7 Sample 1 Analysis Page 8 Identified substances Page 8 Statement of findings Page 13 Identification methods Page 23 Summary Page 29 Z-Scores Page 30 Sample 2 Analysis Page 33 Identified substances Page 33 Statement of findings Page 38 Identification methods Page 48 Summary Page 54 Z-Scores Page 55 Sample 3 Analysis age P 58 Identified substances Page 58 Statement of findings Page 63 Identification methods Page 73 Summary Page 79 Z-Scores Page 80 Sample 4 Analysis Page 84 Identified substances Page 84 Statement of findings Page 86 Identification methods Page 92 Summary Page 98 Test Samples Information Samples Comments on samples Sample 1 SM-1 was prepared from a seizure containing 31.3 % (w/w) 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone base. The test sample also contained lactose. Sample 2 SM-2 was prepared from a seizure containing 5.6 % (w/w) amfetamine base. The test sample also contained caffeine and creatine. Sample 3 SM-3 was prepared from a seizure containing 39.9 % (w/w) metamfetamine base. The test sample also contained lactose. Sample 4 SM-4 was a blank test sample of damiana leaf and contained no substances from the ICE menu Samples Substances Concentrations Comments on substances Sample 1 3,4-Methylenedioxypyrovalerone 31.3 % Lactose - Sample 2 Amfetamine 5.6 % Sample 3 Lactose - Metamfetamine 39.9 % Sample 4 [blank sample] - This report contains the data received from laboratories participating in the current exercise. -
The Evolution of the Regulation of the Medical Uses of Psychedelic Drugs and Marijuana
CHAPTER 1 THE EVOLUTION OF THE REGULATION OF THE MEDICAL USES OF PSYCHEDELIC DRUGS AND MARIJUANA Scholarly investigations into the medical properties of psychedelic drugs and marijuana began in the United States in the 19th century within a completely open regulatory environment. The FDA was not yet established.4 Neither physicians5 nor pharmacists6 were required to have licenses. Consumers as well as physicians could purchase whatever drugs they chose without prescriptions.7 Medicines did not need to identify their contents.8 Research protocols did not need to be given prior approval by any Federal agency.9 Patients did not need to sign “informed consent forms” outlining the risks of participating in the research protocol.10 Protocols did not need to be approved by local Institutional Review Boards (IRB).11 No state had yet established its own review 4Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906. 59 P.L. 384; 59 Cong. Ch. 3915; 34 Stat. 768. June 30, 1906. 5In 1889, the Supreme Court upheld the right of States to require licenses for physicians, which were to be obtained from State Boards of Health. Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U.S. 114 (1889). Justice Field, delivering the opinion of the Court, stated, “The power of the State to provide for the general welfare of its people authorizes it to prescribe all such regulations as, in its judgment, will secure or tend to secure them against the consequences of ignorance and incapacity as well as of deception and fraud.“ 6Around the turn of the century, almost all pharmacists were licensed by State Boards. -
Laws and Regulations Promulgated to Give Effect to the Provisions of the International Treaties on Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances
UNITED NATIONS E/NL. 1979/33-38 3 November 1981 ENGLISH ONLY LAWS AND REGULATIONS PROMULGATED TO GIVE EFFECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL TREATIES ON NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES AUSTRALIA Communicated by the Government of Australia NOTE BY THE SECRETARY-GENERAL - In accordance with the relevant Articles of the International Treaties on Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, the Secretary-General has the honour to communicate the following legislative texts. INDEX Page E/NL.1979/33 WESTERN AUSTRALIA: Order in Council under Poisons Act, 196^- 1970, of 21 April 1978 1 E/NL.1979/3^ WESTERN AUSTRALIA: Amendment to the Poisons Act Regulations, 1965, of 16 October 1978 2 1979/35 E/NL. VICTORIA: Health (Amendment) Act 1977 3 Narcotic and Psychotropic Drugs Act, 193^- 1979/36 E/NL. SOUTH AUSTRALIA: 1977: Application to certain drugs lh Narcotic and Psychotropic Drugs E/NL.1979/37 SOUTH AUSTRALIA: Regulations, 1978 18 Amendments to the Narcotic and E/NL.1979/38 SOUTH AUSTRALIA: Psychotropic Drugs Regulations, 1978 WESTERN AUSTRALIA E/NL.1979/33 Government Gazette, 21 April 1978 1/ Poisons Act, 196^-1970- ORDER IN COUNCIL WHEREAS "by section 21 of the Poisons Act, 196U-1970, it is provided that the Governor may from time to time, by Order in Council, amend any of the Schedules referred to in section 20 of that Act by (i) the addition thereto or the deletion therefrom of any substance; (ii) the deletion and substitution of all of the items in any Schedule; (iii) the transference of any substance from any Schedule to