DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Program SAS Conference § 2015 § Oakland, CA, USA April 9-11, 2015 SOCIETY FOR AFFECTIVE SCIENCE Second Annual Conference § 2015 Final Program Thursday, April 9th Pre-Conference Workshops 4:30 p.m.-7:00 p.m. (separate registration required for Pre-Conference Workshops) East 1 Opening Session 8:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. Welcome: Room OCC202 Lisa Feldman Barrett, SAS President Emotional and Health Consequences of Early Life Adversity 4:40 p.m.-5:40 p.m. Chair: Richard Lane East 1 Invited Address: 9:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. Neural Circuits for the Regulation of Emotion and Stress Room OCC210 and Risk for Mental Illness Pattern Recognition in Affective Neuroscience Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg, University of Heidelberg Chair: Tor Wager Introduced by Joshua Buckholtz, Harvard University 9:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. 5:45 pm-7:00 pm Room OCC208 East 1 Positive Emotions Panel Discussion: Chair: June Gruber Charles Carver, University of Miami Phoebe Ellsworth, University of Michigan 12:00 noon-7:00 p.m. Dacher Keltner, University of California Berkeley East Foyer Gerald Clore, University of Virginia Registration 7:00 p.m.-8:30 p.m. 4:00 p.m.-6:00 p.m. East 2 East Foyer Reception/Cash Bar and Poster Session A Exhibitor Check-In PAGE 1 SAS Conference § 2015 § Oakland, CA, USA April 9-11, 2015 Friday, April 10th 7:30 a.m.-6:00 p.m. 12:45 p.m.-2:00 p.m. East Foyer Area Restaurants (see your ticket for location) Registration Lunch Break–Methods Based Thematic Lunches Organizer: Greg Siegle, University of Pittsburgh 8:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. Pre-registration required for method lunches. East Foyer Exhibits on Display Domains and Design 8:00 a.m.-9:30 a.m. • Face Processing (FACS, FACES, Automated Facial East 2 Recognition) Poster Session B Jeff Cohn & Dacher Keltner Coffee and Breakfast • Hormones and Emotion Pranjal Mehta & Mark Ellenbogen 9:45 a.m.-11:15 a.m. • Affect and Social Interactions East 1 Piotr Winkielman & Evan Carr “TED-Style” Talks Moderator: Robert Levenson, University of California, Berkeley • Emotion & Sleep Peter Franzen Rats as Inspiration to Study Human Social Determinants of Health • Mindfulness & Affect Darlene Francis, University of California, Berkeley Philippe Goldin & Hedy Kober Emotion, an Unexpected Journey: From the Self to Social • Measurement of Emotion in Commercial Product Contexts and Back Again Development Kevin Ochsner, Columbia University Herb Meiselman A Big Surprise About Arousal and Electrodermal Activity 2:15 p.m.-3:15 p.m. Rosalind Picard, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Salons With Coffee Empatica, Inc. Join one of our Affective Science experts for an informal 11:30 a.m.-12:30 p.m. Q&A over tea or coffee. Salons are intended to provide an East 1 opportunity to have candid discussions on research, career Invited Address topics, and the future of affective science. The Development of Emotional Life: From Biological Structures to Cultural Rules 2:15 p.m.-3:15 p.m. Michael Lewis, Rutgers University Room OCC208 Introduced by Kristina Olson, University of Washington Salon Lisa Feldman Barrett, Northeastern University 12:45 p.m.-2:00 p.m. Lunch Break 2:15 p.m.-3:15 p.m. Room OCC201 Salon Ian Gotlib, Stanford University PAGE 2 SAS Conference § 2015 § Oakland, CA, USA April 9-11, 2015 Friday, April 10th (continued) 2:15 p.m.-3:15 p.m. The Dynamics of Continuous Self-Control Room OCC210 Peter Sokol-Hessner, New York University Salon Animal Emotion Robert Levenson, University of California, Berkeley Eliza Bliss-Moreau, University of California, Davis 2:15 p.m.-3:15 p.m. The Integration of Emotion and Cognition in the Brain Room OCC204 Alexander J. Shackman, University of Maryland Salon Environmental Experience and Emotion Regulation in Batja Mesquita, University of Leuven Children Katie McLaughlin, University of Washington 3:30 p.m.-4:30 p.m. East 1 4:45 p.m.-6:15 p.m. Flash Talks East 1 Moderator: Kristen Lindquist, University of North Carolina, “TED-Style” Talks Chapel Hill Moderator: Ann Kring, University of California, Berkeley Observational Fear and Safety Learning in an Intergroup The Power of Pride Context Jessica Tracy, University of British Columbia Andreas Olsson, Karolinska Institutet Single Neuron Correlates of Emotion Regulation in Humans Choosing the Negative: A Study of Morbid Curiosity Moran Cerf, Kellogg School of Management Suzanne Oosterwijk, University of Amsterdam Feelings of Motivation in the Developing Brain: How Do Millionaires in Misery? Affective Vocalization in Response Children Acquire Heartfelt Goals and Priorities? to Winning the Lottery Ronald E. Dahl, University of California, Berkeley Hillel Aviezer, Hebrew University of Jerusalem Emodiversity and the Emotional Ecosystem: Associations with Mood Symptoms and Health June Gruber, University of Colorado, Boulder Saturday, April 11th 7:30 a.m.-6:00 p.m. 8:30 a.m.-10:00 a.m. East Foyer East 2 Registration Poster Session C Coffee and Breakfast 8:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. East Foyer Exhibits on Display PAGE 3 SAS Conference § 2015 § Oakland, CA, USA April 9-11, 2015 Saturday, April 11th (continued) 10:15 a.m.-11:15 a.m. 12:45 p.m.-2:00 p.m. East 1 Area Restaurants (see your ticket for location) Invited Address Lunch Break–Methods Based Thematic Lunches Historical Homogeneity, Emotional Expressiveness, and Organizer: Greg Siegle, University of Pittsburgh the Social Functions of Smiles Pre-registration required for method lunches. Paula Niedenthal, University of Wisconsin Introduced by Piotr Winkielman, University of California Special Populations, Individual Differences, and San Diego Interventions • Fear and Anxiety—in the Lab, Clinic, and Real World 11:30 a.m.-12:30 p.m. Christine Rabinak & Margee Kerr East 1 Flash Talks • Detecting Emotion Where it’s Sometimes Hard to Find Moderator: Greg Siegle, University of Pittsburgh (Schizophrenia, Trauma) Liz Martin & Wendy D’Andrea Human Amygdala-Prefrontal Cortex Development and the Role of Parents • Affect and Culture Nim Tottenham, University of California, Los Angeles Nim Tottenham & Jeanne Tsai Social and Affective Effects of Intranasal Oxytocin in • Emotion & Brain Stimulation, (e.g., TMS, TDCS) Psychiatric Illness? Nicole Prause Joshua Woolley, University of California, Los Angeles • The Future of Psychotherapy for Emotional Disorders: Self-Control, Social Norms, and the Value of Antisocial Neuroscience/Clinical Dialogs Behavior Jay Fournier & Paul Hamilton Joshua W. Buckholtz, Harvard University • Mixed Emotions Emotion Regulation in the Aging Brain Catherine Norris Carien van Reekum, University of Reading • Affect and Social Interactions Inferring Affect from Conversational Rhythms: Piotr Winkielman & Evan Carr Electrocortical Activity During Inter-Speaker Gaps Dan Foti, Purdue University 2:15 p.m.-3:15 p.m. East 1 Adaptations to Danger: Traumatic Stress Effects on the Invited Address Immune System Aoife O’Donovan, University of California, San Francisco Stress, Emotion, and Aging Elissa Epel, University of California San Francisco Faces In-Between: Fluency Transforms Social Inferences Introduced by Lis Nielsen, National Institute of Aging From Facial Expressions Piotr Winkielman, University of California, San Diego 3:15 p.m.-3:45 p.m. East Foyer Coffee Break With Baked Goods PAGE 4 SAS Conference § 2015 § Oakland, CA, USA April 9-11, 2015 Saturday, April 11th (continued) 4:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m. 5:15 p.m.-6:45 p.m. East 1 East 1 Flash Talks Presidential Symposium: Consciousness and Affect Moderator: Kristina Olson, University of Washington Moderator: Lisa Feldman Barrett, Northeastern University Threat and the Condemnation of Gay Rights • How Social Neuroscience Impacts Moral Philosophy Kurt Gray, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Patricia Churchland, University of California, San Diego Physiological Stress Contagion in Mothers and Babies and Salk Institute Sara Waters, Washington State University, Vancouver • Threat, Heart, and Cerebral Construction of Emotion An Early-Emerging Link Between Social Categorization and Hugo Critchley, University of Sussex Emotion Perception • Unplanned Inferences into Self-Consciousness: Studies Yarrow Dunham, Yale University of Emotion in Frontotemporal Dementia and Alzheimer's Find, Remind, and Bind: The Role of Gratitude in Ongoing Disease Relationships Bruce Miller, University of California, San Francisco Sara Algoe, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill • Curiosity, the Drive for Knowledge and the Attentional Implications of Third-Person Self-Talk for Emotion Lantern Regulation Allison Gopnik, University of California, Berkeley Ozlem Ayduk, University of California, Berkeley 6:45 p.m.-8:00 p.m. The Two Faces of Testosterone: Dual-Hormone Changes East 2 Track Earnings in Bargaining and Trading Contexts Closing Reception and Awards Pranjal Mehta, University of Oregon Awe Enhances Memory for Details Michelle Shiota, Arizona State University A Person-by-Situation Approach to Emotion Regulation: Whether Cognitive Reappraisal Helps or Hurts Depends on the Context Iris Mauss, University of California, Berkeley PAGE 5 SAS Conference § 2015 § Oakland, CA, USA April 9-11, 2015 LEVEL I REST ROOMS W M ELEVATORS WEST EAST GRAND BALLROOM FOYER EXTENSION ATRIUM ELEVATORS CONVENTION BOX OFFICE EXHIBIT FOYER CENTER FOYER LEVEL II 214-LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER 213 REST ROOMS M 212 W 211 210 JUNIOR OPEN TO EXHIBIT HALL BELOW BALLROOM 208 OPEN TO BELOW ELEVATORS 207 206 205 204 203 202 201 TRAVELBAR PRE-FUNCTION LOUNGE FOYER PAGE 6 SAS Conference § 2015 § Oakland, CA, USA April 9-11, 2015 2015 SAS ANNUAL MEETING SPONSORS The Society for Affective Science would like to thank our 2015 sponsor. www.brainvision.com
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Management 7421 Self-Leadership for Executives Spring 2010 Professor COURSE PROCEDURES
    Management 7421 Self-Leadership for Executives Spring 2010 Professor Robert W. Renn, Ph.D. Department of Management Office: 305 BB Phone: 678-2886 E-mail: [email protected] Office Hours: By appointment Textbooks: Christopher Neck & Charles Manz. 2010. Mastering Self-Leadership: Empowering Yourself for Personal Excellence . 5th Edition, Pearson Prentice-Hall. Linda Elder & Richard Paul. 2007. The Thinker’s Guide to Analytic Thinking . Foundation for Critical Thinking. www:criticalthinking.org. Course Description : This course covers major theories, concepts, and principles of self-leadership. In addition, it applies critical thinking skills to self-leadership theories, concepts, and principles to facilitate deep understanding of self-leadership. Emphasis is given to understanding the overall logic of self-leadership, each stage of the self- leadership process, and to applying critical thinking skills to each element within each stage of self-leadership. Each student will prepare a self-leadership action plan, and individual studies will be pursued with group analysis and discussion at regular class meetings. Course Objectives 1. To create an interest in and develop an awareness of self-leadership. 2. To provide an opportunity to explore, discuss and analyze major theories, concepts, and principles of self- leadership. 3. To provide an opportunity to learn and apply critical thinking skills to the major theories, concepts, and principles of self-leadership. 4. To assist graduate students with learning the application of self-leadership skills. 5. To develop a self-leadership action plan. COURSE PROCEDURES General. This is a seminar course. It requires high involvement, self-motivation, and a willingness to assume an active role in your own learning and self-leadership development.
    [Show full text]
  • Melike Acar 1
    Melike Acar CURRICULUM VITAE MELIKE ACAR, PhD Boğaziçi University Center for Educational Policy Studies ETA-B #602 Bebek, Istanbul 34342 E-mail: [email protected] +90 212 359-4821 PERSONAL DATA Telephone: +90 532 703-9455 Address: Anafartalar Sk. 4/9 Yesilkoy, Istanbul 34149 EDUCATION University of California, Berkeley 2005-2011 PhD. in Human Development and Education Advisors: Elliot Turiel, Susan Holloway, Kaiping Peng Subfields: 1) Moral and ethical studies and their relation to education 2) Social and cognitive development 3) Family interactions in cultural context Thesis: Concepts of Morality, Personal Autonomy, and Parental Authority in Multifaceted Social Issues: An Examination of Daughters’ and Mothers’ Reasoning in Religious and Secular Istanbul, Turkey San Francisco State University 2002-2005 MA in Developmental Psychology Advisor: Linda Juang Thesis: Perceived self-efficacy beliefs and family environment among Turkish and American college students Boğaziçi University B.A. in Psychological Counseling and Guidance 1996-2001 Istanbul Cağaloğlu Anadolu Lisesi 1989-1996 COURSES THOUGHT Cognitive Development, San Francisco State University Early Childhood Development and Education, University of California, Berkeley Social Foundations of Education, Bogazici University Life-Span Development, Bogazici University Educational Psychology, Bogazici University Gender & Education, Bogazici University Advanced Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods (graduate level), Bogazici University RESEARCH EXPERIENCE 2014- Researcher at Boğaziçi University Center for Educational Policy Studies. Responsible for collecting and analysis data for the ongoing “Inclusive Education in Turkey” project funded by Bogazici University Scientific Research Projects (BAP). 2009-2010 Fieldwork and interviews with religious and secular women in Istanbul, Turkey 2005- 2006 Involved in Japan-US MOM’s Research Project supervised by Susan Holloway.
    [Show full text]
  • Distinguishing Adaptive Versus Maladaptive Social Support in Computer- Mediated Communication
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330296945 When Chatting About Negative Experiences Helps-and When It Hurts: Distinguishing Adaptive Versus Maladaptive Social Support in Computer- Mediated Communication Article in Emotion · January 2019 DOI: 10.1037/emo0000555 CITATIONS READS 0 96 8 authors, including: David Lee Ariana Orvell The Ohio State University University of Michigan 18 PUBLICATIONS 598 CITATIONS 7 PUBLICATIONS 131 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Susan A Gelman Ozlem Ayduk University of Michigan University of California, Berkeley 318 PUBLICATIONS 15,074 CITATIONS 78 PUBLICATIONS 5,615 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Money Spending and Saving in Childhood View project Evidence Based Assessment of Traumatized and Bereaved Youth View project All content following this page was uploaded by Ariana Orvell on 17 January 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Emotion When Chatting About Negative Experiences Helps—and When It Hurts: Distinguishing Adaptive Versus Maladaptive Social Support in Computer-Mediated Communication David S. Lee, Ariana Orvell, Julia Briskin, Taylor Shrapnell, Susan A. Gelman, Ozlem Ayduk, Oscar Ybarra, and Ethan Kross Online First Publication, January 10, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000555 CITATION Lee, D. S., Orvell, A., Briskin, J., Shrapnell, T., Gelman, S. A., Ayduk, O., Ybarra, O., & Kross, E. (2019, January 10). When Chatting About Negative Experiences Helps—and When It Hurts: Distinguishing Adaptive Versus Maladaptive Social Support in Computer-Mediated Communication. Emotion. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000555 Emotion © 2019 American Psychological Association 2019, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Rejection Sensitivity and the Defensive Motivational System
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Rejection Sensitivity and the Defensive Motivational System Insights From the Startle Response to Rejection Cues Geraldine Downey,1 Vivian Mougios,2 Ozlem Ayduk,3 Bonita E. London,1 and Yuichi Shoda4 1Columbia University; 2Long Island University; 3University of California, Berkeley; and 4University of Washington ABSTRACT––Rejection sensitivity (RS) is the disposition to anx- Why do people who anxiously expect rejection behave in ways that iously expect, readily perceive, and intensely react to rejection. lead to the realization of their worst fears? Our view is that the RS This study used the startle probe paradigm to test whether the dynamic functions to defend the self against rejection by significant affect-based defensive motivational system is automatically ac- others and social groups. To the extent that the individual has expe- tivated by rejection cues in people who are high in RS. Stimuli rienced the pain of rejection, protecting the self from rejection while were representational paintings depicting rejection (by Hopper) maintaining close relationships will become an important goal, and a and acceptance (by Renoir), as well as nonrepresentational self-defensive system such as RS will develop to serve it. However, paintings of either negative or positive valence (by Rothko and this system becomes dysfunctional to the extent that it gets elicited Miro, respectively). Eyeblink startle magnitude was potentiated automatically with minimal rejection cues and sets in motion the in people high in RS when they viewed rejection themes, com- precise actions that ultimately lead to the fulfillment of expectations of pared with when they viewed nonrepresentational negative rejection (Downey, Freitas, Michaelis, & Khouri, 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Distancing Improves Interpersonal Perceptions and Behavior by Decreasing Medial Prefrontal Cortex Activity During the Provision of Criticism Jordan B
    Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2017, 534–543 doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw168 Advance Access Publication Date: 26 December 2016 Original article Self-distancing improves interpersonal perceptions and behavior by decreasing medial prefrontal cortex activity during the provision of criticism Jordan B. Leitner,1 Ozlem Ayduk,1 Rodolfo Mendoza-Denton,1 Adam Magerman,2 Rachel Amey,2 Ethan Kross,3 and Chad E. Forbes2 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA, and 3Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Jordan B. Leitner, Department of Psychology, University of California, 3210 Tolman Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Previous research suggests that people show increased self-referential processing when they provide criticism to others, and that this self-referential processing can have negative effects on interpersonal perceptions and behavior. The current research hypothesized that adopting a self-distanced perspective (i.e. thinking about a situation from a non-first person point of view), as compared with a typical self-immersed perspective (i.e. thinking about a situation from a first-person point of view), would reduce self-referential processing during the provision of criticism, and in turn improve interpersonal perceptions and behavior. We tested this hypothesis in an interracial context since research suggests that self-referential processing plays a role in damaging interracial relations. White participants prepared for mentorship from a self-immersed or self-distanced perspective. They then conveyed negative and positive evaluations to a Black mentee while electroence- phalogram (EEG) was recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Cognitive Control from Preschool to Late Adolescence And
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Predicting Cognitive Control From Preschool to Late Adolescence and Young Adulthood Inge-Marie Eigsti,1 Vivian Zayas,2 Walter Mischel,3 Yuichi Shoda,4 Ozlem Ayduk,5 Mamta B. Dadlani,6 Matthew C. Davidson,7 J. Lawrence Aber,8 and B.J. Casey7 1Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut; 2Department of Psychology, Cornell University; 3Department of Psychology, Columbia University; 4Department of Psychology, University of Washington; 5Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley; 6Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst; 7Sackler Institute for Developmental Psychobiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University; and 8Steinhardt School of Education, New York University ABSTRACT—In this longitudinal study, the proportion of individual differences in cognitive control seem to be evident as time preschoolers directed their attention away from re- early as 18 months of age (Rothbart, Derryberry, & Posner, warding stimuli during a delay-of-gratification task was 1994), the degree to which these differences in early life predict positively associated with efficiency (greater speed without cognitive control later in life has not been assessed. The present reduced accuracy) at responding to targets in a go/no-go longitudinal investigation examined this ability with the delay- task more than 10 years later. The overall findings suggest of-gratification task in preschoolers and the go/no-go paradigm that preschoolers’ ability to effectively direct their atten- when they became adolescents and young adults. Both tasks tion away from tempting aspects of the rewards in a delay- require the individual to effectively control attentional and of-gratification task may be a developmental precursor for behavioral responses to salient information, a hallmark of cog- the ability to perform inhibitory tasks such as the go/no-go nitive control and cognitive development (Casey, Durston, & task years later.
    [Show full text]
  • Vivian Zayas Curriculum Vitae
    Vivian Zayas Curriculum Vitae Department of Psychology voice number: (607) 254-6332 Cornell University fax number: (607) 255-8433 238 Uris Hall email: [email protected] Ithaca, New York 14853-7601 Academic Website: http://comp9.psych.cornell.edu/people/Faculty/vz29.html Lab Website: http://people.psych.cornell.edu/~pac_lab Professional Positions 2013 – present Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Cornell University 2007 – 2013 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Cornell University 2005 – 2006 Research Scientist, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 2003 – 2005 Research Associate, University of Washington, Seattle, WA Education 2003 Ph. D., Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, with distinction Major Area: Social and Personality Psychology 2000 M. S., Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle 1994 B. A., Psychology, Cornell University Research Interests Social Cognition, Attachment, Relationships, First Impressions, Social Exclusion, Personality Honors and Awards Nominated for the Kendall S. Carpenter Memorial Advising Award, 2018 Robert A. and Donna B. Paul Award for Excellence in Advising, 2018 Institute for the Social Sciences (ISS) Faculty Fellow, 2018-2019 *** Fellowships are awarded to “Cornell’s most promising assistant and associate professors.” 4 fellowships were awarded to associate professors from Cornell. *** http://socialsciences.cornell.edu/fellows/ Knowledge Matters Fellowship, 2017 Nominated by department for the Paul Teaching Award, 2017 Named by SPSP Diversity award-winners as most admired
    [Show full text]
  • PSYC 3131 – HUMAN EMOTION Professor June Gruber Fall 2019
    PSYC 3131 – HUMAN EMOTION Professor June Gruber Fall 2019 *Syllabus subject to change. Check Canvas for up-to-date information* Course Information When: Tues 3:30-6:00pm Where: MUEN E431 Course Website: http://www.gruberpeplab.com/teaching/psych3131_fall2019/ Class Twitter: https://twitter.com/psych3131 (@psych3131) Instructor Information Professor June Gruber, Ph.D. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Director, Positive Emotion and Psychopathology Laboratory Office Hrs: Tuesday 1:00-3:00pm (email 24 hrs in advance if planning to attend) Location: MUEN D321C E-mail: [email protected] Note: Please include “PSYC 3131” in subject line. You will receive an answer or acknowledgement within 24 hours (on normal business days). Course Description and Objectives Welcome! This course will introduce students to a diverse array of theoretical and empirical issues related to the study of human emotion. Some questions the course will address include: What are our emotions? What purpose do they serve? How do emotions relate to our thoughts, memories, and behaviors towards others? What happens when our emotional responses go awry? Although these questions date back to early philosophical texts, only recently have experimental psychologists begun to explore this vast and exciting domain of study. The course will begin by discussing the evolutionary origins of distinct emotions such as love, anger, fear, and disgust. We will ask how emotions might color our cognitive processes such as thinking and memory, emotion and the brain, development of emotions in childhood, and how emotions shape our social relationships. We will also consider how these methods can be applied to studying mental illness in both children and adults.
    [Show full text]
  • White, R., Kuehn, M. M., Kross, E., & Ayduk, O
    Emotion Focusing on the Future From Afar: Self-Distancing From Future Stressors Facilitates Adaptive Coping Rachel E. White, Maya M. Kuehn, Angela L. Duckworth, Ethan Kross, and Özlem Ayduk Online First Publication, September 17, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000491 CITATION White, R. E., Kuehn, M. M., Duckworth, A. L., Kross, E., & Ayduk, Ö. (2018, September 17). Focusing on the Future From Afar: Self-Distancing From Future Stressors Facilitates Adaptive Coping. Emotion. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000491 Emotion © 2018 American Psychological Association 2018, Vol. 1, No. 999, 000 1528-3542/18/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/emo0000491 Focusing on the Future From Afar: Self-Distancing From Future Stressors Facilitates Adaptive Coping Rachel E. White Maya M. Kuehn Hamilton College and University of Pennsylvania University of California, Berkeley Angela L. Duckworth Ethan Kross University of Pennsylvania University of Michigan Özlem Ayduk University of California, Berkeley Prior research indicates that visual self-distancing enhances adaptive self-reflection about negative past events (Kross & Ayduk, 2011). However, whether this process is similarly useful when people reflect on anxiety-provoking future negative experiences, and if so, whether a similar set of mechanisms underlie its benefits in this context, is unknown. Here we addressed these questions using a combination of experimental and individual difference methods with adults and adolescents (total N ϭ 2,344). In Studies 1 and 2, spontaneous self-distancing predicted less anxious emotional reactivity among adults and adolescents. This effect was mediated by differences in how vividly participants imagined a future anxiety-provoking event.
    [Show full text]
  • Neural Activity to a Partner's Facial Expression Predicts Self-Regulation After Conflict
    Neural Activity to a Partner's Facial Expression Predicts Self-Regulation After Conflict The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Hooker, Christine I., Anett Gyurak, Sara C. Verosky, Asako Miyakawa, and Özlem Ayduk. 2010. “Neural Activity to a Partner’s Facial Expression Predicts Self-Regulation After Conflict.” Biological Psychiatry 67 (5) (March): 406–413. doi:10.1016/ j.biopsych.2009.10.014. Published Version 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.10.014 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:17497807 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Biol Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 March 1. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: Biol Psychiatry. 2010 March 1; 67(5): 406±413. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.10.014. Neural activity to a partner's facial expression predicts self- regulation after conflict Christine I. Hooker1, Anett Gyurak2, Sara Verosky3, Asako Miyakawa3, and Özlem Ayduk2 1Harvard University, Psychology Department 2University of California at Berkeley, Psychology Department 3University of California at Berkeley, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute Abstract Introduction—Failure to self-regulate after an interpersonal conflict can result in persistent negative mood and maladaptive behaviors. Research indicates that lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) activity is related to the regulation of emotional experience in response to lab-based affective challenges, such as viewing emotional pictures.
    [Show full text]
  • Third-Person Self-Talk Facilitates Emotion Regulation Without Engaging Cognitive Control: Converging Evidence from ERP and Fmri Jason S
    Third-person self-talk facilitates emotion regulation without engaging cognitive control: Converging evidence from ERP and fMRI Jason S. Moser, Michigan State University Adrienne Dougherty, University Michigan Ann Arbor Whitney I. Mattson, University Michigan Ann Arbor Benjamin Katz, University Michigan Ann Arbor Tim Moran, Emory University Darwin Guevarra, University Michigan Ann Arbor Holly Shablack, University Michigan Ann Arbor Ozlem Ayduk, University of California John Jonides, University Michigan Ann Arbor Marc G. Berman, University of Chicago Only first 10 authors above; see publication for full author list. Journal Title: Scientific Reports Volume: Volume 7, Number 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group | 2017-12-01 Type of Work: Article | Final Publisher PDF Publisher DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04047-3 Permanent URL: https://pid.emory.edu/ark:/25593/s3vzf Final published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04047-3 Copyright information: © 2017 The Author(s). This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Accessed September 24, 2021 11:13 AM EDT www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Third-person self-talk facilitates emotion regulation without engaging cognitive control: Received: 7 September 2016 Accepted: 24 May 2017 Converging evidence from ERP and Published: xx xx xxxx fMRI Jason S. Moser1, Adrienne Dougherty2, Whitney I. Mattson2, Benjamin Katz2, Tim P. Moran1,5, Darwin Guevarra2, Holly Shablack2, Ozlem Ayduk3, John Jonides2, Marc G. Berman4 & Ethan Kross2 Does silently talking to yourself in the third-person constitute a relatively effortless form of self control? We hypothesized that it does under the premise that third-person self-talk leads people to think about the self similar to how they think about others, which provides them with the psychological distance needed to facilitate self control.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul K. Piff 9/2017 1
    Paul K. Piff 9/2017 1 PAUL K. PIFF Curriculum Vitae Department of Psychology and Social Behavior Office: 4324 SBSG 4324 Social and Behavioral Sciences Gateway Phone: (949) 824-9362 University of California, Irvine Fax: (949) 824-3002 Irvine, CA [email protected] 92697-7085 paulpiff.wix.com/paulpiff ACADEMIC POSITIONS HELD AND EDUCATION University of California, Irvine Assistant Professor of Psychology and Social Behavior (July 2014- current) University of California, Berkeley Post-doctoral scholar (June 2012-June 2014) University of California, Berkeley Ph.D. in Psychology (May 2012) Dissertation: On wealth and wrongdoing: How social class influences unethical behavior (Dacher Keltner, Chair) ***First Prize APA Social Issues Dissertation Award University of California, Berkeley M.A. in Psychology (May 2008) Reed College B.A. in Psychology (January 2004) EDITORIAL POSITIONS Editorial Review Boards Emotion (guest associate editor) (2016-current) Social Issues and Policy Review (2015-current) RESEARCH INTERESTS Social Hierarchy, Inequality, Emotion, Groups, Prosocial Behavior, Morality, Uncertainty HONORS AND AWARDS 2017 Fellow, Society of Experimental Social Psychology 2016 Rising Star, Association for Psychological Science Paul K. Piff 9/2017 2 2015 Emerging Leadership in Psychology, American Psychological Association (APA) Committee on Socioeconomic Status 2012 First Prize, Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI) Dissertation Award, Division 9 of the American Psychological Association 2011 Outstanding Graduate Student Instructor, UC Berkeley 2010 Society for Personality and Social Psychology (SPSP) Student Travel Award 2008-2011 National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship 2008-2010 NSF IGERT Program in Politics, Economics, Psychology and Public Policy Fellowship 2007 Diebold Fellowship, UC Berkeley 2004 Phi Beta Kappa, Reed College 2001-2004 Commendations for Academic Excellence, Reed College 2001-2003 Henry W.
    [Show full text]