In the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho Tracy Tucker
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
IN THE SUPREME COURT OFTHE STATE OF IDAHO TRACY TUCKER, JASON SHARP, ) NAOMI MORLEY, JEREMY PAYNE, ) Supreme Court No. 43922 on behalf of themselves and all others ) similarly situated, ) Ada Co. Case No. ) CV–OC–2015–10240 Plaintiffs–Appellants, ) ) vs. ) ) STATE OF IDAHO; C.L. “BUTCH” ) OTTER, in his official capacity as ) Governor of Idaho, HON. LINDA ) COPPLE TROUT, DARRELL G. BOLZ, ) SARA B. THOMAS, WILLIAM H. ) WELLMAN, KIMBER RICKS, SEN. ) CHUCK WINDER, and REP. CHRISTY ) PERRY, in their official capacities as ) members of the Idaho State Public ) Defense Commission, ) ) Defendants–Respondents. ) ) APPELLANTS’ REPLY BRIEF Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District for Ada County. The Honorable Samuel A. Hoagland, District Judge, presiding. _______________________________ Richard Alan Eppink, residing at Boise, Idaho; Jason D. Williamson, residing at New York, New York; Kathryn M. Ali and Brooks Hanner, residing at Washington, D.C.; and Andrew C. Lillie, residing at De nver, Colorado; for Appellants. Steven L. Olsen, Michael S. Gilmore, Shasta Kilminster–Hadley, and Scott Zanzig, residing at Boise, Idaho, for Respondents State of Idaho, Hon. Linda Copple Trout, Darrell G. Bolz, Kimber Ricks, Sen. Chuck Winder, and Rep. Christy Perry. Cally A. Younger, residing at Boise, Idaho, for Respondent Governor C.L. “Butch” Otter. Daniel J. Skinner, residing at Boise, Idaho, for Respondents Sara B. Thomas and William H. Wellman. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................... 6 II. ARGUMENT ............................................................................................................................. 9 A. Standing .............................................................................................................................. 9 1. Plaintiffs Have Sufficiently Alleged Injury–in–Fact, and Their Claims are Ripe....... 9 2. The Causal Connection Between Defendants’ Inaction and Plaintiffs’ Injuries is More Than Sufficient. ................................................................................................11 3. Plaintiffs’ Claims Are Redressable by Defendants, Particularly Following the Passage of the Amendments to Idaho Code § 19–850. ............................................. 18 4. This Court Has Set Forth a Relaxed Standing Analysis, Not Just a Relaxed Injury–In Fact Analysis. ............................................................................................................ 22 B. Separation of Powers ........................................................................................................ 23 1. The Right to Counsel is an Affirmative Duty and Therefore Its Enforcement Requires the State to Take Affirmative Steps............................................................ 25 2. Dismissal on Separation of Powers Grounds Eliminates Checks and Balances That This Court is Exclusively Bound to Provide. ............................................................ 28 C. The State’s Extraneous Arguments ................................................................................... 31 III. CONCLUSION....................................................................................................................... 33 TUCKER V. STATE OF IDAHO – APPELLANTS’ BRIEF – Page i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Alabama Coal. for Equity, Inc. v. Hunt, No. CIV. A. CV–90–883–R, 1993 WL 204083 (Ala. Cir. Ct. Apr. 1, 1993)..........................26 Archie v. City of Racine, 847 F.2d 1211 (7th Cir. 1988) .................................................................................................26 Argonaut Ins. Co. v. White, 86 Idaho 374, 386 P.2d 964 (1963)..........................................................................................16 Babbitt v. United Farm Workers Nat’l Union, 442 U.S. 289 (1979).............................................................................................................7, 11 Banner Life Ins. Co. v. Mark Wallace Dixson Irrevocable Tr., 147 Idaho 117, 206 P.3d 481 (2009)........................................................................................27 Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977).................................................................................................................26 Citizens for Better Forestry v. USDA, 341 F.3d 961 (9th Cir. 2003) ...................................................................................................18 City of Revere v. Massachusetts Gen. Hosp., 463 U.S. 239 (1983).................................................................................................................25 Coeur d’Alene Tribe v. Denney, No. 43169, 2015 WL 7421342 (Idaho Nov. 20, 2015)......................................................22, 23 Credit Bureau of E. Idaho, Inc. v. Lecheminant, 149 Idaho 467, 235 P.3d 1188 (2010) .....................................................................................27 Culinary Workers Union, Local 226 v. Del Papa, 200 F.3d 614 (9th Cir. 1999) ...................................................................................................11 Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179 (1973)...................................................................................................................7 Doe v. State, 158 Idaho 778, 352 P.3d 500 ...................................................................................................32 Duncan v. State, 284 Mich. App. 246, 774 N.W.2d 89 (2009).......................................................................8, 10 Edgewood Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Kirby, 777 S.W.2d 391 (Tex. 1989)..............................................................................................27, 28 Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976)...................................................................................................................25 Estep v. Comm’rs of Boundary Cty., 122 Idaho 345, 834 P.2d 862 (1992)........................................................................................12 Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 (1994)...................................................................................................................7 APPELLANTS’ BRIEF – Page 1 Fenton v. Bd.of Comm’rs of Ada Cty., 20 Idaho 392, 119 P. 41 (1911)................................................................................................29 Finstuen v. Crutcher, 496 F.3d 1139 (10th Cir. 2007) ...............................................................................................14 Fuchs v. State, 152 Idaho 626, 272 P.3d 1257 (2012)........................................................................................8 Gideon v. Wainwright, 153 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 1963).........................................................................................................6 Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 (1956)...................................................................................................................25 Hall v. State, 983 F. Supp. 2d 820 (M.D. La. 2013) .....................................................................................33 Helling v. McKinney, 509 U.S. 25 (1993) ....................................................................................................................7 HRPT Properties Tr. v. Lingle, 715 F. Supp. 2d 1115 (D. Haw. 2010).....................................................................................17 Hurrell–Harring v. State, 15 N.Y.3d 8, 930 N.E.2d 217 (N.Y. 2010)........................................................................10, 33 Idaho Bldg. & Const. Trades Council, AFL–CIO v. Wasden, 32 F. Supp. 3d 1143 (D. Idaho 2014) ......................................................................................17 Idaho Mut. Benefit Ass’n v. Robison, 65 Idaho 793, 154 P.2d 156 (1944)..........................................................................................32 ISEEO v. Evans, 123 Idaho 573, 850 P.2d 724 (1993)............................................................................21, 25, 30 ISEEO v. State, 142 Idaho 450, 129 P.3d 1199 (2005)..............................................................21, 27, 30, 31, 32 King v. Dep’t of Emp’t, 110 Idaho 312, 715 P.2d 982 (1986)........................................................................................28 Kitchen v. Herbert, 755 F.3d 1193 (10th Cir. 2014) .........................................................................................12, 13 Lakeside Roofing Co. v. Nixon, No. 4:10CV01761, 2011 WL 1465593 (E.D. Mo. Apr. 18, 2011)..........................................14 Landgraf v. USI Film Products, 511 U.S. 244, 144 S. Ct. 1483 (1994)......................................................................................15 Los Angeles Cty. Bar Ass’n v. Eu, 979 F.2d 697 (9th Cir. 1992) .................................................................................13, 15, 17, 21 Luckey v. Harris, 860 F.2d 1012 (11th Cir. 1988) ...................................................................................10, 13, 32 Maine v. Moulton, 474 U.S. 159 (1985).................................................................................................................26 APPELLANTS’ BRIEF – Page 2 Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 1 Cranch 137 (1803) .................................................................................24, 28, 30 McDuffy v. Sec’y of Exec.Office of Educ., 415 Mass. 545, 615 N.E.2d