Threats to Religious and Ethnic Minorities Under the Islamic State July 28, 2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Threats to Religious and Ethnic Minorities Under the Islamic State July 28, 2016 Threats to Religious and Ethnic Minorities under the Islamic State July 28, 2016 In partnership with the Institute for Studies of Religion and the U.S. State Department’s Office of International Religious Freedom Acknowledgements The research for this RFP publication was carried out in collaboration with the Institute for Studies of Religion at Baylor University and the U.S. State Department’s Office of International Religious Freedom. This publication was made possible through the support of a grant from the John Templeton Foundation. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation. About the Religious Freedom Project The Religious Freedom Project (RFP) at Georgetown University’s Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs is the nation’s only university-based program devoted exclusively to the analysis of religious freedom, a basic human right restricted in many parts of the world. Under the leadership of Director Thomas Farr and Associate Director Timothy Shah, the RFP engages a team of international scholars to examine and debate the meaning and value of religious liberty; its importance for democracy; and its role in social and economic development, international diplomacy, and the struggle against violent religious extremism. The RFP began in 2011 with the generous support of the John Templeton Foundation. In 2014 that support continued, while the project also began a three-year partnership with Baylor University and its Institute for Studies of Religion under Director Byron Johnson. For more information about the RFP’s research, teaching, publications, conferences, and workshops, visit our website at http://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/rfp. About the Berkley Center for Religion, Peace & World Affairs The Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs at Georgetown University, created within the Office of the President in 2006, is dedicated to the interdisciplinary study of religion, ethics, and public life. Through research, teaching, and service, the center explores global challenges of democracy and human rights; economic and social development; international diplomacy; and interreligious understanding. Two premises guide the center’s work: that a deep examination of faith and values is critical to address these challenges, and that the open engagement of religious and cultural traditions with one another can promote peace. 2 BERKLEY CENTER FOR RELIGION, PEACE & WORLD AFFAIRS AT GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY RELIGIOUS FREEDOM PROJECT — JULY 2016 Introduction In March 2016, the U.S. House of Representatives and galvanize long-term thinking about addressing this crisis, the Secretary of State John Kerry declared that the Islamic State Religious Freedom Project hosted a daylong conference at (also referred to as ISIS, ISIL, and Daesh in this report) Georgetown University. is committing genocide against Christians, Yazidis, Shi’a Muslims, and other religious and ethnic minority groups in During the conference representatives of the targeted Syria and Iraq. ISIS is also committing crimes against humanity communities shared their personal experiences of religious and ethnic and religious cleansing against Kurds and Sunni persecution and their recommendations for policymakers. Muslims. Unfortunately, months later, ISIS and other violent Among the questions they engaged were: What are the extremist groups continue to target and terrorize their victims immediate security challenges posed by ISIS? What can we do through rape, enslavement, and murder, while religious and now to ensure the viability of vulnerable religious and ethnic cultural sites are systematically looted and destroyed. communities in Iraq and Syria? What steps need to be taken to ensure religious freedom, and how is religious freedom a possible To inform policymakers about the continuing travail of antidote to future violence? Community representatives were religious and ethnic minorities threatened by ISIS, and to joined by distinguished policymakers, activists, and scholars. BERKLEY CENTER FOR RELIGION, PEACE & WORLD AFFAIRS AT GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY RELIGIOUS FREEDOM PROJECT — JULY 2016 3 Program Welcome Thomas Farr, Religious Freedom Project Knox Thames, U.S. Department of State Religious and Ethnic Leaders’ Perspectives Moderator: Naomi Kikoler, U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum Panelists: Father Behnam Benoka, Humanitarian Nineveh Relief Organization Mar Awa Royel, Assyrian Church of the East Breen Tahseen, Representative of the Yazidi Prince Advocacy and Civil Society Perspectives Moderator: Eliza Griswold, New America Foundation Panelists: Murad Ismael, Yazda Rajab Assi Kareem, Kaka’i Representative Mona Malik, Assyrian Aid Society Ali A. Zainalabdeen, Turkmen Rescue Foundation Keynote Address: David Saperstein, U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom International Perspectives Moderator: Stephen Colecchi, U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops Panelists: Kent Hill, Religious Freedom Institute Sherri Kraham Talabany, SEED Foundation Christine van den Toorn, American University of Iraq at Sulaimani Post-Liberation: Promises and Challenges Moderator: Robert A. Destro, Catholic University of America Panelists: Mohammad Al Abdallah, Syria Justice and Accountability Centre Bassam Ishak, Syriac National Council of Syria Saad Salloum, Al-Mustansiriya University Pascale Warda, Hammurabi Human Rights Organization 4 BERKLEY CENTER FOR RELIGION, PEACE & WORLD AFFAIRS AT GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY RELIGIOUS FREEDOM PROJECT — JULY 2016 Religious and Ethnic Leaders’ Perspectives THOMAS FARR: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Wel- does ISIS pose to the region, to the West, and to the United come to Georgetown University. Thank you for joining us for States? What can we do now to ensure the future viability of this important conference on one of the important issues of vulnerable religious and ethnic communities in Iraq and Syria? our day: the continuing threats to religious and ethnic minori- What steps need to be taken to ensure religious freedom, and ties under the so-called Islamic State. I’m Tom Farr, director of how is religious freedom a possible antidote to future violence? the Berkley Center’s Religious Freedom Project here at George- You’ll also hear from a series of distinguished policymakers, ad- town. We’re delighted to be hosting this event with the support vocates, and scholars. of our colleagues at the Office of International Religious Free- dom of the U.S. Department of State. Let me turn now to one of the most distinguished policymak- ers, my friend and colleague Knox Thames. In September of In March 2016, the U.S. House of Representatives—and later last year, Knox was named the State Department’s first special the U.S. Senate as well as Secretary John Kerry—declared that advisor for religious minorities in the Near East and South and the Islamic State is committing genocide against Christians, Central Asia. Knox is a highly effective and powerful advocate Yazidis, Muslims, and other religious and ethnic minorities in for religious minorities, and we’re delighted to have him with Syria and Iraq. Unfortunately, months later, ISIS and other us today. violent extremist groups continue to target and terrorize their victims through torture, rape, enslavement, murder, and forced KNOX THAMES: Thanks, Tom. Ladies and gentlemen, re- emigration. They also continue to engage in a systematic cam- ligious and ethnic minorities in the Middle East have suf- paign of looting and destroying religious and cultural sites, in- fered human rights violations, discrimination, and violence cluding houses of worship. for years. However, the emergence of Daesh introduced the world to a new level of brutality. In response, we have come Today, you will hear from representatives of those targeted together out of a shared concern about the future of religious communities. They will share their personal experiences of re- diversity and pluralism in Iraq and Syria. We stand together ligious persecution and their recommendations for U.S. and in our joint condemnation of the atrocities that Daesh has Western policymakers. Among the questions they will engage committed against religious and ethnic minorities in these include the following: What immediate security challenges countries, as well as against majority communities. We stand BERKLEY CENTER FOR RELIGION, PEACE & WORLD AFFAIRS AT GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY RELIGIOUS FREEDOM PROJECT — JULY 2016 5 a meeting like this focusing on ways to protect religious and ethnic minorities. In response to these efforts, we’re convening these meetings today and tomorrow at the State Department as a concrete ex- pression of concern about the future of religious and ethnic minorities in Iraq and Syria. The time is right. With each pass- ing day, we’re closer to seeing the liberation of Mosul and the surrounding Nineveh plains. We take these actions out of rec- ognition that more must be done to give minorities confidence that they have a future in their ancestral homelands. We have brought together civil society and religious leaders, activists, faith communities, and diplomats to discuss this imperative task. How can the international community more effectively meet this existential challenge for minorities? In short, we want to better understand their needs and to devise concrete responses to address them. I want to be very clear: The protection of religious and eth- nic minorities in Iraq and Syria is a foreign policy priority
Recommended publications
  • Program in Arms Control & Domestic and International Security
    IJOIS Spring 2016, Volume I 86 Program in Arms Control & Domestic and International Security American Foreign Policy Towards the Islamic State Derek Hoot University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Abstract As the Islamic State evolved, so did American foreign policy and the Obama administration’s ability to counter threats such as the Islamic State (IS). The Administration’s strategy is comprehensive and utilizes the entire capacity of the US government, its partners, and its membership organizations. The nine core elements are distinct, and each one has ratified national and international policies to demonstrate the proactive pursuit of each line of effort. In looking at statements and resolutions drafted by the UN and G-7, it is clear that the United States is driving the foreign policy discussion in the fight against IS. It is also clear that the policy-makers behind Operation Inherent Resolve have broken free from the foreign policy axioms that hindered the Bush Administration officials from engaging in effective decision-making. Instead of superimposing liberal democratic ideals on Iraqi institutions, the United States is supporting effective and inclusive governance. Additionally, the United States is no longer of searching for American interests within American values. The US government views the fight against IS to an issue of regional and global security and enlisted its partners in the Middle East, NATO, and the United Nations to support its mission of degrading and ultimately destroying the Islamic State. This paper examines how the United States’ failed Iraq policy facilitated the rise of a radical Sunni insurgency, analyzes the United States’ foreign policy towards the Islamic State, and offers criticism of American strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2014
    www.rbs0.com/syria14.pdf 8 Nov 2014 Page 1 of 86 Syria & Iraq: October 2014 Copyright 2014 by Ronald B. Standler No copyright claimed for quotations. No copyright claimed for works of the U.S. Government. Table of Contents 1. Chemical Weapons in Syria Alleged Use of Chlorine Gas at Kafr Zeita on 11 April Alleged Use of Chlorine Gas in Iraq on 15 Sep 2. Syria United Nations Diverted from Syria death toll in Syria now over 193,000 (31 Oct) Rebels in Syria, including U.S. Military aid Recognition that Assad is Winning the Civil War New U.N. Negotiator for Syria U.N. Security Council Resolutions 2139 and 2165 (24 Sep, 23 Oct) Henning beheaded 3. Iraq Iraq death toll atrocities in Iraq ISIL bombings in Iraq ISIL executions in Iraq Islamic public relations problem No Criminal Prosecution of Cowardly Iraqi Army Officers Iraqi Parliament meets ministers approved (18 Oct) 4. Daily News about Syria & Iraq (including press briefings & press conferences, speeches) Turkey Parliament votes to fight ISIL (2 Oct); Turkey vs. Kurds more Daily News (3-7 Oct) siege of Kobani suggestions that airstrikes ineffective (begins 7 Oct) Anbar province to fall? (begins 9 Oct) more Daily News (9-22 Oct) 5. U.S. Airstrikes in Iraq & Syria, U.S. Military Policy 39 airstrikes near Kobani during 14-15 Oct airdrop in Kobani on 19 Oct www.rbs0.com/syria14.pdf 8 Nov 2014 Page 2 of 86 6. Conclusions Foreword I have posted an annotated list of my previous eleven essays on Syria. That webpage also includes links to historical documents on the Syrian civil war and a table of dates of removals of chemical weapons from Syria.
    [Show full text]
  • Authority to Order Targeted Airstrikes Against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
    (Slip Opinion) Authority to Order Targeted Airstrikes Against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant The President had the constitutional authority to order targeted airstrikes in Iraq against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant without prior congressional authorization. The President had reasonably determined that these military operations would further sufficiently important national interests. A combination of three relevant national in- terests—protecting American lives and property; assisting an ally or strategic partner at its request; and protecting endangered populations against humanitarian atrocities, including possible genocide—supported the President’s constitutional authority to order the operations without prior congressional authorization. The anticipated nature, scope, and duration of the military operations did not rise to the level of a “war” within the meaning of the Declaration of War Clause. December 30, 2014 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE COUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT On August 8, 2014, United States Armed Forces commenced targeted airstrikes in Iraq against the terrorist group the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (“ISIL”). Before the strikes began, our Office advised you that the President had the constitutional authority to order these military operations because he had reasonably determined that they would further sufficiently important national interests, and because their anticipated nature, scope, and duration were sufficiently limited that prior congres- sional approval was not constitutionally required. This memorandum memorializes and explains the basis for our advice.1 1 This advice was provided before the President decided to rely on statutory authority for military operations against ISIL. We accordingly do not address in this opinion whether the targeted military actions discussed herein were authorized by any statute.
    [Show full text]
  • The Assyrian Church of the East: a Panoramic View of a Glorious History
    The Assyrian Church of the East: A Panoramic View of a Glorious History Mar Awa Royel Apostolic Origins and Beginnings The beginnings of the Assyrian Church are to be found in the very first decades of the apostolic era. With the revelation of the Son of God in the flesh, the salvific message of the Gospel was open to all peoples of divers tongues and cultures. The Gospel-writer St. Luke records in the book of Acts the events of the growth and spread of the Christian Gospel in the Holy City and abroad, to the outer limits of the Roman Empire. We read in the Acts 2 the wondrous happenings surrounding the Pentecost feast celebrated at Jerusalem by our Lord’s disciples. The promise of the Holy Spirit given to disciples before Jesus was taken up to the Father gave hope to the fledgling Christian community at Jerusalem (cf. John 16:13; Acts 1:4). This promise was fulfilled on the day of the Jewish feast of the Pentecost, which took place at Jerusalem 50 days after the Lord’s Resurrection. Luke records: And there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven. Now when this was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were confounded, because that every man heard them speak in his own language. And they were all amazed and marveled, saying one to another. Behold, are not all these which speak Galileans? And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born? Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judea and Cappodocia in Pontus, and Asia… (Acts 2:5-9) Among those who had gone up to Jerusalem in order to be present in the Holy City for the Pentecost feast, there were Jews from Mesopotamia.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Note: SNIA/6977 Last Updated: 25 September 2014
    Iraq, Syria and ISIS – recent developments Standard Note: SNIA/6977 Last updated: 25 September 2014 Author: Ben Smith, Claire Mills and Rob Page Section International Affairs and Defence Section Since the shock takeover of Mosul, the progress of ISIS through Iraq has been slowed and, in some places reversed. This has happened because further, Shia-dominated territory is more difficult for ISIS to conquer and because demoralised Iraqi forces are increasingly supported by Shia militias, often with Iranian organisational help, by Kurdish Peshmerga forces who are receiving assistance from the West, and by US air strikes. The formation of a new government in Baghdad has raised hopes that a political solution to the violence could emerge, but even a broadly acceptable Iraqi government will have to deal with intractable problems including the failures of the armed forces, sharing of oil revenues, decentralisation demands and territorial disputes. The UK and other Western governments have pledged to assist the Kurdish Peshmerga and the Iraqi government, and this is widely thought to comply with international law, despite the lack of UN Security Council resolution, because the Iraqi government has requested assistance to deal with ISIS. However, any outside military action in Syria (which is thought to be necessary if ISIS is going to be tackled effectively) would be more difficult to justify. US officials have argued that intervention in Syria could be legally justified as an extension of the collective defence of Iraq. Others argue that it could be legal as a humanitarian intervention, without a Security Council resolution; any such resolution would be likely to be vetoed by Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Sept-Oct-2013.Pdf
    Voice of the East 1 Voice of the East 2 Voice of the East VOICE OF THE EAST Patron : His Grace Dr. Mar Aprem (A socio-Religious bi-monthly) Metropolitan’s Palace, Trichur - 680 001, Kerala, India (Private Circulation only) Phone : 91487 - 2420978 September-October 2013 Personal : 91487 - 2442166 Email : [email protected] Contents 1. Editorial (Church of the East Seminary – India) International News 2. Challenges Facing Middle East Christians Conference Held in Amman, Jordan 3. “We Believe In” National Youth Conference 2013 4. WCC Assembly in Busan, Korea 30 October - 8 November 2013 5. Biography – The Late Korosh Ezaria Royel 6. Mr. Simon Fuller on the Church of the East in India Indian Archdiocese News 7. Message from Bishop Mar Awa Royel to Mar Aprem Parish 8. Swarga TV (Sri Lanka) Interviews Mar Aprem Metropolitan 9. St. Stephen Church Consecrated in New Delhi 10. International Youth Conference - 2014 in India 11. Press Meet in Thrissur 12. Two Deacons Ordained at Mar Beesho Church, Puthoor 13. Condolence Letter from Rabi Juliet Kasha (Arizona) on the Repose of Rev’d Fr M.I. David of India Colour photos in pages 7,8,9,10 and cover pages 1,2,3,4. 3 Voice of the East Voice of the East Vol. 60 September - October 2013 Nos. 9 & 10 Editorial Church of the East Seminary – India On 6th October 2013 the renovated building of the Seminary of the Church of the East in India was blessed by Mar Aprem Metropolitan, Mar Yohannan Yoseph Episcopa and Mar Awgin Kuriakose Episcopa assisted by a large number of priests, deacons and the faithful.
    [Show full text]
  • The Islamic State: How Viable Is It? Yoram Schweitzer and Omer Einav, Editors
    The Islamic State: How Viable Is It? Yoram Schweitzer and Omer Einav, Editors COVER The Islamic State: How Viable Is It? Yoram Schweitzer and Omer Einav, Editors Institute for National Security Studies THE INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURcITY STUDIES INCORPORATING THE JAFFEE b d TheCENTER FOR STRA InstituteTEGIC STUDIES for National Security Studies (INSS), incorporating the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, was founded in 2006. The purpose of the Institute for National Security Studies is first, to conduct basic research that meets the highest academic standards on matters related to Israel’s national security as well as Middle East regional and international security affairs. Second, the Institute aims to contribute to the public debate and governmental deliberation of issues that are – or should be – at the top of Israel’s national security agenda. INSS seeks to address Israeli decision makers and policymakers, the defense establishment, public opinion makers, the academic community in Israel and abroad, and the general public. INSS publishes research that it deems worthy of public attention, while it maintains a strict policy of non-partisanship. The opinions expressed in this publication are the authors’ alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute, its trustees, boards, research staff, or the organizations and individuals that support its research. The Islamic State: How Viable Is It? Yoram Schweitzer and Omer Einav, Editors THE INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURcITY STUDIES INCORPORATING THE JAFFEE b d CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES המדינה האסלאמית דגל שחור מתנוסס מעליה יורם שוייצר ועומר עינב, עורכים Editor: Judith Rosen Graphic design: Michal Semo-Kovetz, Yael Bieber Cover design: Michal Semo-Kovetz, Adva Lubrani Printing: Elinir Institute for National Security Studies (a public benefit company) 40 Haim Levanon Street POB 39950 Ramat Aviv Tel Aviv 6997556 Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy Synod of the Holy Apostolic Catholic Assyrian Church of the East 
    ܟܢܘܫܝـܐ ܣܘܢܗܕܝܩܝܐ ܕܥܕ� ܩܕܝܫــ� اﻟﻤﺠﻤﻊ اﻟﺴوﻨﻬﺎدوﺴــــﻲ ّاﻟﻤﻘدس ܘܫܠܝܚܝ� ̣ܩܬܘܠܝܩܝ ̱ܕܡܕܢܚܐ ܐܬ ̣̣ܘܪܝܐ ﻟﻛﻨﻴﺴــة اﻟﻤﺸرق اﻵﺸورﻴـــــﺔ The Holy Synod of the Holy Apostolic Catholic Assyrian Church of the East For Immediate Release 21 July 2014 The Holy Synod of the Holy Apostolic Catholic Assyrian Church of the East, presided by His Holiness Mar Dinkha IV, Catholicos-Patriarch, wishes to express its unequivocal condemnation of the terroristic and barbaric acts perpetrated against the Christians of the ancient city of Mosul (Nineveh) by the fundamentalist terrorist group known as ISIS. The utter cleansing of city of Mosul of its Christian inhabitants, who have dwelled in this city since ancient and apostolic times, is indeed a crime against humanity itself. The thousands of families who have been forced to leave the city, having their homes and properties confiscated and re-appropriated by this terrorist organization, must be publicly condemned by all the governmental agencies and bureaus of the Republic of Iraq, without further delay. This persistent campaign against the Christians of Mosul and its environs, which has escalated to a climactic degree as of Saturday, July 19, 2014, must be condemned by the international community at large. In a particular and primary fashion, we call upon the Iraqi government to protect the Christians of Iraq and to safeguard the thousands who have had to flee their homes and seek refuge in churches, monasteries and other houses of worship. The fundamental right to life is guaranteed in the Preamble of the UN Charter of 1945, to which the Republic of Iraq is a signee. Further, the United Nations and other international agencies of good will must do all that is within their means and spheres of influence to safeguard the Christians of Iraq who are being subjected to a calculated and inhumane policy of discrimination and extermination.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 November 11, 2014 MEMORANDUM for HASC
    November 11, 2014 MEMORANDUM FOR HASC MEMBERS RE: Full Committee Hearing on the Administration’s Strategy and Military Campaign against Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) On Thursday, November 13, 2014, at 10:00 AM in Room 2118 of the Rayburn House Office Building, the full committee will meet in open session to receive testimony on the Administration’s strategy and military campaign against ISIL. Should you need additional information, please contact Alex Gallo (x6-7164), Mike Casey (x6-6127), or Aaron Falk (x6-3297) on the committee staff. WITNESSES The Honorable Chuck Hagel Secretary of Defense General Martin E. Dempsey Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff 1 This memo provides an update on the U.S. policy, strategy, and military campaign against ISIL. Members and staff should also reference the memo from the hearing on U.S. Military Operations in Iraq and the Administration’s Strategy for the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) for additional background and context. U.S. POLICY AND STRATEGY AGAINST ISIL In a speech to the nation on September 10, 2014, President Obama outlined his policy and strategy to counter ISIL in Syria and Iraq: “Our objective is clear: We will “degrade, and ultimately destroy, ISIL through a comprehensive and sustained counterterrorism strategy.”1 He presented a four-prong strategy: 1. A systematic campaign of airstrikes against ISIL. 2. Increased support to forces fighting ISIL on the ground. 3. Drawing on our substantial counterterrorism capabilities to prevent ISIL attacks. 4. Providing humanitarian assistance to innocent civilians displaced by ISIL.2 The Administration’s strategy includes nine lines of effort: Supporting Effective Governance in Iraq: We are supporting the new Iraqi government on efforts to govern inclusively and effectively as well as to strengthen its cooperation with regional partners.
    [Show full text]
  • THEHARP a Review of Syriac, Oriental and Ecumenical Studies
    THEHARP A Review of Syriac, Oriental and Ecumenical Studies Volume: XXXIII 2018 St. Ephrem Ecumenical Research Institute (SEERI) Baker Hill, Kottayam - 686001, Kerala, India i THEHARP A Review of Syriac, Oriental and Ecumenical Studies © SEERI Publications, Kottayam All Rights reserved Published by St. Ephrem Ecumenical Research Institute (SEERI) Edited by Jacob Thekeparampil Thomas Koonammakkal Baby Varghese With the Assistance of Metropolitan Mar Aprem, Assad Sauma, Sebastian P. Brock, J.P. Deschler, F.B. Chatonnet, A. Desreumaux, R.Y. Ebied, D. Taylor, T.C. Falla, K.M. George,W. Hage, A. Harrak, F. Cassingena, K.H. Kuhlmann, H. Teule, K. McVey, A. Badwi, A. Schmidt, H. Suermann, M. Tamcke, J. Tubach, L. Van Rompey, J.W. Watt, Cornelia B. Horn, Muriel Debié, D. Winkler, Jiffy F. Mekkattukulam, Shabo Talay, E. Vergani Printed in India Composed & laid out by Kaval Graphics, Kottayam Printed at St. Joseph’s Press, Mannanam Price In India Rs. 300.00 + Postage All correspondences regarding the Review should be addressed to: The Editors, The Harp, SEERI, Baker Hill, Kottayam - 686 001, Kerala, India Phone : 0091 481 2564333, 2560856. E-mail: [email protected] & [email protected] iiii Contents Editorial 1 Two Vital Collections of Syriac Manuscripts - Sebastian Brock 11 Why Patriarch Aphrem Barsaum was called "Athoraya"?: An investigation into the Geographical names Athor and Mosul in Syriac - Assad Sauma 51 The Syriac Calligraphy: A secret incantation and an initiatory journey which demands constant training and impeccable principles - Behnam
    [Show full text]
  • Kurds in Iraq and Syria: U.S. Partners Against the Islamic State
    Kurds in Iraq and Syria: U.S. Partners Against the Islamic State Updated December 28, 2016 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44513 Kurds in Iraq and Syria: U.S. Partners Against the Islamic State Summary Since 2014, the United States and members of a coalition it leads have partnered with a politically diverse set of Kurdish groups to combat the Islamic State organization (IS, also known as ISIS/ISIL or by the Arabic acronym Da’esh). For background information on these groups and their relationships in the region, see CRS In Focus IF10350, The Kurds in Iraq, Turkey, Syria, and Iran, by Jim Zanotti and Bolko J. Skorupski. The capabilities of various Kurdish ground forces have advanced some U.S. objectives in connection with ongoing anti-IS operations. At the same time, as these operations increasingly focus on predominantly Sunni Arab areas such as Mosul, Iraq, and Raqqah, Syria, U.S. officials are encouraging Kurdish forces to support and empower the combat and post-conflict administration profile of non-Kurdish forces that may have greater ethnic and political legitimacy with local populations. U.S. officials also seek to avoid having U.S. cooperation with Kurds significantly disrupt U.S. relations with other partners, including the Iraqi central government and NATO ally Turkey in light of those partners’ respective concerns and operations on the ground in Iraq and northern Syria. Legal authorities enacted by Congress and the President permit the Administration to provide some arms and some Iraq/Syria anti-IS-related funding to Kurdish groups under certain conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 the United States: Challenges for the Global Power
    Chapter 7 The United States: Challenges for the Global Power n recent years, skepticism has arisen even within the United States about the Imaterialization and sustainability of the rebalance to the Asia-Pacific, promoted by the Barack Obama administration. Such views were reinforced by the federal budget sequestration, which went into effect in 2013, and the forced cancellation of President Obama’s tour of Asia scheduled for fall of that same year in the aftermath of the federal government shutdown. However, the Obama administration has been continuously pursuing the rebalance policy and engaging actively with the issues relating to the regional order. This consistent stance seems to reflect the administration’s perception that China’s recent actions have already began to affect the regional order. Since the United States emphasizes the peaceful resolution of disputes based on international rules and norms, it has a heightening sense of crisis over China’s actions in the South China Sea. Against the background, the United States has been modernizing its relationship not only with the allies including Japan, Australia, South Korea, and the Philippines, but also with key regional partners such as India and Vietnam and ASEAN-centered regional institutions. In addition, despite fiscal constraints, it is reinforcing its military presence in the Asia-Pacific. Plans that have been revealed include the deployment of the USS Ronald Reagan from San Diego to replace the USS George Washington, which will be leaving Yokosuka for defueling in FY 2015, and the forward deployment of two additional Aegis ballistic missile defense (BMD) ships to Yokosuka. Rotational deployment of the US Marine Corps to Australia was also implemented on a significantly larger scale than in 2013.
    [Show full text]