Augusta County Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Augusta County Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Reddish Knob 5 ×8 Woodland Home Communities Sand Spring Mountain Jack Mountain Buck Mountain Little Bald Knob Middle Mountain Tearjacket Knob Hardscrabble Knob S Grindstone Mountain k i d more Fo Big Bald Knob rk Freezland Flat Trimble Mountain Castle Hill Gordons Peak No Lookout Mountain rth River Elkhorn Mountain Pinnacle, The Wise Hill Elkhorn Lake Hankey Mountain Buck Hill Peak, The Chestnut Oak Knob Little North Mountain Signal Corps Knob Tims Knob Coalpit Knob Mount Sidney Grottoes Crawford Mountain Crawford Knob Bald Rock er iv R ure ast fp l a r C e v i R Huckleberry Hill M th id u Horsehead Mountain d o le S R iv Round Hill er Chimney Rock Rocks Mountain Haycock Knob Elliott Knob Northeast Peak Great North Mountain Hogback Davis Mountain Bettys Hill Rough Hill r e iv Archer Knob R Turk Mountain e r Skyline Drive u st ek Stony Hill a e Kiser Hill p r lf C a k C c e a tl Sugarloaf Lit B Ramsey Mountain Mikes Knob Gibson Hill ek Hickory Hill re Cave Hill th C Smi Scott Mountain Round Hill Miller Knob Big Knob Copelands Tetons k e C e h r Afton Mountain r So C istia uth k ns R c Cre iv a ek er B JJJ Mountain Newport Hill Laurel Hill Blue Ridge Parkway Miller Hill Burnt Hill Russell Rock Donald Fauber Mountain Cellar Mountain Kelley Mountain Torry Mountain Flint Mountain r e v i Knob Of Rocks R th Mine Bank Mountain u Little Spy Mountain So Sherando Lake Big Spy Mountain Long Drive Mountain Meadow Mountain Pennsylvania !( Places Interstate Ohio D Peaks US / State Highway Maryland "&Y West Virginia Fire Dept/Station Secondary Road Cities / Towns Hydrography Kentucky Virginia 0 2.5 5 10 Miles Tennessee North Carolina Data Source(s): Commonwealth of Virginia, Census 2010 This map was prepared and produced at the Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission and is to be used for planning purposes only. FEMA, VDEM, VDOF, USGS, CSPDC, Augusta County Map information is believed to be accurate however accuracy is not guaranteed..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Birds Rockingham County
BIRDS OF ROCKINGHAM COUNTY VIRGINIA Clair Mellinger, Editor Rockingham Bird Club o DC BIRDS OF ROCKINGHAM COUNTY VIRGINIA Clair Mellinger, Editor Rockingham Bird Club November 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................1 THE ENVIRONMENT....................................................................3 THE PEOPLE AND THE RECORDS........................................11 THE LOCATIONS........................................................................23 DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS......................................29 SPECIES ACCOUNTS...............................................................33 LITERATURE CITED................................................................ 113 INDEX...........................................................................................119 PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE AMERICAN GOLDFINCHES ON THE FRONT AND BACK COVER WERE GENEROUSLY PROVIDED BY JOHN TROTT. The American Goldfinch has been used as the emblem for the Rockingham Bird Club since the club’s establishment in 1973. Copyright by the Rockingham Bird Club November 1998 FOREWORD AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This book is the product and a publication of the Rockingham Bird Club. It is a compilation of many historical and more recent records of bird sightings in Rockingham County. The primary purpose of the book is to publish Rockingham County bird records that may otherwise be unavailable to the general public. We hope that these records will serve a variety of useful purposes. For example, we hope that it will be useful to new (and experienced) birders as a guide to when and where to look for certain species. Researchers may find records or leads to records of which they were unaware. The records may support or counterbalance ideas about the change in species distribution and abundance. It is primarily a reference book, but fifty years from now some persons may even find the book interesting to read. In the Records section we have listed some of the persons who contributed to this book.
[Show full text]
Signal Knob Northern Massanutten Mountain Catback Mountain Browns Run Southern Massanutten Mountain Five Areas of Around 45,000 Acres on the Lee the West
Sherman Bamford To: [email protected] <[email protected] cc: Sherman Bamford <[email protected]> > Subject: NiSource Gas Transmission and Storage draft multi-species habitat conservation plan comments - attachments 2 12/13/2011 03:32 PM Sherman Bamford Forests Committee Chair Virginia Chapter – Sierra Club P.O. Box 3102 Roanoke, Va. 24015 [email protected] (540) 343-6359 December 13, 2011 Regional Director, Midwest Region Attn: Lisa Mandell U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services 5600 American Blvd. West, Suite 990 Bloomington, MN 55437-1458 Email: [email protected] Dear Ms. Mandell: On behalf of the Virginia Chapter of Sierra Club, the following are attachments to our previously submitted comments on the the NiSource Gas Transmission and Storage (“NiSource”) draft multi-species habitat conservation plan (“HCP”) and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (“Service”) draft environmental impact statement (“EIS”). Draft of Virginia Mountain Treasures For descriptions and maps only. The final version was published in 2008. Some content may have changed between 2007 and 2008. Sherman Bamford Sherman Bamford PO Box 3102 Roanoke, Va. 24015-1102 (540) 343-6359 [email protected] Virginia’s Mountain Treasures ART WORK DRAWING The Unprotected Wildlands of the George Washington National Forest A report by the Wilderness Society Cover Art: First Printing: Copyright by The Wilderness Society 1615 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 (202)-843-9453 Wilderness Support Center 835 East Second Avenue Durango, CO 81302 (970) 247-8788 Founded in 1935, The Wilderness Society works to protect America’s wilderness and to develop a nation- wide network of wild lands through public education, scientific analysis, and advocacy.
[Show full text]
Birds of Augusta County, Virginia
Birds of Augusta County, Virginia Fourth Edition Dan N. Perkuchin, Editor Published by Augusta Bird Club November 2016 Birds of Augusta County 2016 This summary manuscript being made available to the public in downloadable electronic form is the Fourth Edition of the Augusta Bird Club’s Birds of Augusta County, Virginia. The first edition was published in July 1988 with YuLee R. Larner and John F. Mehner co-editors; the second edition was published in November 1998 with YuLee R. Larner the editor; and the third edition was published in January 2008 with YuLee R. Larner the editor. This fourth edition was created and edited in two different time frames. The early manuscript entries from 1 Dec 2007 through 30 Nov 2011 where updated by YuLee R. Larner, with assistance from Stephen C. Rottenborn. The later entries from 1 Dec 2011 through 30 Nov 2016 were updated by Dan N. Perkuchin. The document was released to the public in July 2018. EDITORIAL COMMENTS: This manuscript’s species summary information was extracted from information contained within the companion Augusta Bird Club’s computerized historical file; i.e., “Birds of Augusta County, Virginia, Historical Document, November 2016;” i.e., all of the species information in this “BAC 2016 Summary Manuscript, 4th Edition” matches corresponding species information contained in the “BAC 2016 Historical Document.” There are three sequence numbers listed in front of each species. For example: “258/253/236. PALM WARBLER.” • The first number corresponds to the September 2017 eBird Virginia Species Checklist, and the "Fifty-Seventh Supplement to the American Ornithologists’ Union Check-list of North American Birds, Volume 133, 2016." • The second number corresponds to the species order in the Augusta Bird Club's published November 2011 updated blue- checklist; i.e., “Checklist of Birds of August County, Virginia (Revised).” This sequence also corresponds to the AOU Checklist on North American Birds, 1998, and its changes through the 52nd Supplement, July 2011.
[Show full text]
Walter Dent<Br>
Planning.comments.f To: [email protected] [email protected] cc: s Subject: 02/07/2009 09:20 AM Submitted by: Walter Dent<br>At: [email protected]<br>Remark: After attending the last meeting I would like to stress that I believe at this time we have enough wilderness areas in the state of Virginia. Untouched areas of \"wilderness\" may seem like a good idea to some but what it really does is cut the effectiveness of the Forest Service to manage the land. As you are aware of, wilderness areas can be devastated by Gypsy moth infestation, tree diseases, ice storms and fire to name a few and the FS will be helpless to implement any recovery plans. I also believe a lot of the interest for new wilderness is not brought here by local people that actually use the forest but by special interest groups who have never been to the GW/JNF and have their own agendas. I feel that the back country designation achieves everything a wilderness area designation does with out tying the hands of the FS. I would also like to voice my concerns over OHV trails in the national forest. At this time there are a documented 244 miles designated OHV trails in the forest. Unfortunately, I and many others can\'t tell the difference between a \"High vehicle clearance\" roads and a normal fire road. We as the OHV community are all for protecting the environment and treading lightly as witnessed by all the volunteer actions such as trail clean ups, trail repairs and assisting the forest service in various OHV projects, but if a trail is maintained at a level that a non high clearance vehicle can navigate it, then the \"High vehicle clearance\" designation is moot.
[Show full text]
RESULTS of SPIRIT LEVELING in VIRGINIA ^,V ^£A
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR BULLETIN 562 RESULTS OF SPIRIT LEVELING IN VIRGINIA ^,v ^£a. 1900 TO 1913, INCLUSIYE R. B. MARSHALL, CHIEF GEOGRAPHER Part of work since 1907 done in cooperation with State of Virginia through Virginia Geological Survey T. L. Watson, State Geologist CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 5 Cooperation............................................................ 5 Previous publication................................................... 5 Personnel............................................................. 5 Classification.......................................'................... 5 Bench marks......................................................... 6 Datum............................................................... 6 Topographic maps.................................................... 7 Precise leveling............................................................ 8 Bonsacks, Cahas Mountain, Callaghan, Clarksville, Clifton Forge, Eagle Eock, Martinsville, Natural Bridge, and Rocky Mount quadrangles (Alleghany, Botetourt, Franklin, Henry, Mecklenburg, and Roanoke counties)........................................................... 8 Bramwell and Peterstown quadrangles (Giles and Tazewell counties)..... 13 Primary leveling.. 1........................................................ 14 Hallwood and Snow Hill quadrangles (Accomac County)................. 14 Hampton, Isle of Wight, Surry, Toano, Williamsburg,
[Show full text]
Genetic Resource Conservation of Table Mountain Pine (Pinus Pungens) in the Central and Southern Appalachian Mountains Robert M
Genetic Resource Conservation of Table Mountain Pine (Pinus pungens) in the Central and Southern Appalachian Mountains Robert M. Jetton, Barbara S. Crane, W. Andrew Whittier, and William S. Dvorak Research Assistant Professor, Camcore, Department of Forestry & Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University (NC State), Raleigh, NC; Regional Geneticist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Region National Forest System, Atlanta, GA; Research Forester, Camcore, Department of Forestry & Environmental Resources, NC State, Raleigh, NC; Professor and Director Emeritus, Camcore, Department of Forestry & Environmental Resources, NC State, Raleigh, NC Abstract associated with small isolated mountains. The typically small, geographically isolated populations occur mostly along south- Table Mountain pine (Pinus pungens Lambert) was historically and west-facing ridgelines and outcroppings at elevations a widespread pine species native to the central and southern between 1,000 and 4,000 ft (300 and 1,200 m). Soils are incep- Appalachian Mountains, but, in recent decades, its current tisols that are low in productivity, shallow, stony, and highly natural distribution has been reduced to less than 30,000 ac acidic and have poor profile development (Zobel 1969). Trees (12,000 ha). Reasons for this decline include wildfire suppres- growing on these sites have a stunted, gnarled, wind-sculpted sion programs of the early 20th century, southern pine beetle appearance, but the species can grow taller and straighter on out breaks, and recent climate fluctuations. Part of the effort to better quality sites (figure 2). mitigate this decline is a 5-year, cooperative, genetic-resource conservation effort being conducted by Camcore (International Table Mountain pine is a member of the pine subsection Aus- Tree Breeding and Conservation, North Carolina [NC] State trales and is most closely related to pitch pine (Pinus rigida University) and the U.S.
[Show full text]
Geographic Variations in Fine-Scale Vegetation Patterns: Aspect Preferences of Montane Pine Stands Over Southern Appalachian Landscapes
Physical Geography ISSN: 0272-3646 (Print) 1930-0557 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tphy20 Geographic variations in fine-scale vegetation patterns: aspect preferences of montane pine stands over Southern Appalachian landscapes Charles W. Lafon, Alison A. Hanson & Rosemary A. Dwight To cite this article: Charles W. Lafon, Alison A. Hanson & Rosemary A. Dwight (2019) Geographic variations in fine-scale vegetation patterns: aspect preferences of montane pine stands over Southern Appalachian landscapes, Physical Geography, 40:5, 433-460, DOI: 10.1080/02723646.2019.1576013 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2019.1576013 Published online: 13 Feb 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 104 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tphy20 PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY 2019, VOL. 40, NO. 5, 433–460 https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2019.1576013 ARTICLE Geographic variations in fine-scale vegetation patterns: aspect preferences of montane pine stands over Southern Appalachian landscapes Charles W. Lafon , Alison A. Hanson and Rosemary A. Dwight Department of Geography, Texas A&M University, College Station, College Station, TX, USA ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Landscape mosaics commonly reflect local terrain interactions with Received 19 July 2018 broad-scale processes. In the northern hemisphere, insolation inter- Accepted 26 January 2019 acts with terrain such that south-facing slopes are warmer, drier, and KEYWORDS fl have sparser and more ammable vegetation than north-facing Pinus pungens Lamb; Pinus slopes. These vegetation differences are reinforced through positive rigida Mill; Table Mountain feedbacks.
[Show full text]
April 25, 2016 Bird Material #2
ROCKBRIDGE AREA CONSERVATION COUNCIL P.O. Box 564, Lexington, VA 24450 (540) 463-2330 [email protected] http://rockbridgeconservation.org April 25, 2016 Sarah Nystrom U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Virginia Field Office 6669 Short Lane Gloucester, VA 23061 Dear Sarah, As we discussed, I am sending records from the Rockbridge Bird Club for your use in reviewing the impacts and operating conditions of the proposed APEX Rocky Forge Wind Turbine Power Plant on North Mountain, Virginia, adjacent to the Botetourt County/Rockbridge County line. The reports are also posted online at: http://www.vmi.edu/Content.aspx?id=10737428051 . Also included for your reference are the most recent ten years of Audubon Christmas Bird Counts for the Rockbridge area (Lexington (VALE)) documenting winter occurring species (http://netapp.audubon.org/CBCObservation/Historical/ResultsByCount.aspx ). The Rockbridge Bird Club, one of the oldest in Virginia, has a long and highly respected history. The Club’s website at http://www.rockbridgebirdclub.org/ has the most recent and continually updated local information. As your technical team will undoubtedly appreciate, the notations on expected occurrence in the enclosed records (e.g. “rare and should not be expected to be seen in the county”) are intended for the bird watching public to assist in observing, and are not an indication of the possibility of conflict with the proposed power plant. Rather, potential impacts may be more significant for those rarely-sighted species where infrequent sighting is also an indication of reduced populations, shrinkage of range, or dissection of habitat especially for a project of this large number of turbines on a ridgeline within largely intact forested habitat.
[Show full text]
Appalachian National Scenic Trail North Country
Maine Great Eastern Trail Appalachian National Scenic Trail Vermont New Hampshire Massachusetts New York Finger Lakes Trail Rhode Island Crystal Hills Trail Non-GET connection, NY 48 miles in Steuben County, NY Connecticut Wisconsin Conservation Trail Non-GET connection, NY ! Michigan Corning Wellsboro ! Great Eastern Woolrich North Country ! Trail National Scenic Trail Pennsylvania ! New Jersey State College Standing Stone Trail Mid State Trail (of PA) 84 miles east route, PA 123 miles west route Mount Union ! 202 miles common route Tuscarora Trail Non-GET portion, PA Everett ! Hancock ! Maryland Paw Paw ! Delaware Ohio GET west route in MD 53 miles Green Ridge SF ! + C&O Canal NHP WinchesterDistrict of Columbia Big Schloss Allegheny Trail # Non-GET portion, WV Potomac Heritage Tuscarora Trail (Part) Indiana Tuscarora Trail 92 miles in VA, WV, MD on common route Non-GET portion, VA Reddish Knob National Scenic Trail ! 41 miles in MD, PA # Harrisonburg Illinois West Virginia on east route TuGuNu Section Allegheny Trail (Part) WV,VA 80 miles open in WV, VA Warm Springs In development with 30 mi disjuncture ! ~40 miles open of temp route through White ~190 mile future trail Sulphur Springs, WV Virginia Pike Energy Trail Hinton Pike County, KY ! Hanging Rock Mullens # In development ! Headwaters Section Matewan !Pineville ~40 miles future trail ! Pearisburg 165 miles hikable on ! trails, forest roads VA, WV Mary Ingles Elkhorn City ! Trail near Great Eastern Narrows, VA 21 mile co-alignment Whitesburg Sheltowee Trace ! Appalachian National
[Show full text]
May 7, 2010 Maureen T. Hyzer, Forest Supervisor ATTN
May 7, 2010 Maureen T. Hyzer, Forest Supervisor ATTN: George Washington Plan Revision George Washington & Jefferson National Forests 5162 Valleypointe Parkway Roanoke, VA 24019–3050 [email protected] BY E-MAIL AND U.S. MAIL Re: George Washington Plan Revision – Comments on Notice of Intent published 3/10/2010 Dear Ms. Hyzer and GW Plan Revision Team: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an environmental impact statement and revised land management plan using the provisions of the 1982 National Forest System land and resource management planning regulations for the George Washington National Forest (GW), 75 Fed. Reg. 11107 (Mar. 10, 2010). Please accept the following comments on behalf of the Southern Environmental Law Center, the Southern Appalachian Forest Coalition, and The Wilderness Society. We are glad that the GW will revise its plan under the 1982 National Forest Management Act (NFMA) regulations, as well as prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the plan and consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). These important environmental reviews and protections have been missing from the plan revision, which was begun under the now-invalidated 2005/2008 NFMA regulations. With the NOI, however, the GW has released a highly detailed, virtually complete draft revised forest plan. This plan is based on analyses conducted under those weak, invalid 2005/2008 regulations, rather than on the requirements of the 1982 regulations now governing the revision, such as maintaining fish and wildlife species population viability and identifying lands not suitable for timber production based on certain factors laid out in the rule.
[Show full text]
Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report Summary
USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program VEGETATION OF SHENANDOAH NATIONAL PARK IN RELATION TO ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENTS Final Report (v1.1) 2006 Prepared for: US Department of the Interior National Park Service Prepared By: John Young US Geological Survey Leetown Science Center Kearneysville, WV 25430 Gary Fleming Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Division of Natural Heritage Richmond, VA 23219 Phil Townsend and Jane Foster Department of Forest Ecology and Management University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI 53706 * This document is designed to be viewed in color * USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Shenandoah National Park Table of Contents: LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………………… iii LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………. iv LIST OF CONTACTS AND CONTRIBUTORS……………………………………. v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………. vi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS………………………………….. vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………..viii 1. INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………1 1.1. Background..............................................................................................2 1.2. Scope of Work..........................................................................................5 1.3. Study Area Description……………………………………………………...7 2. METHODS………………………………………………………………………....11 2.1. Environmental Gradient Modeling……………………………………….11 2.2. Sample Site Selection............................................................................19 2.3. Field Survey Methods………………………………………………………20 2.4. Plot Data Management and Classification
[Show full text]
Adams Peak Archer Knob Beards Mountain Beech Lick Knob
Adams Peak Archer Knob Beards Mountain Beech Lick Knob Ranger District Pedlar North River James River, Warm Spgs North River Size of PWA or Addition (acres) 8,226 7,110 10,152 14,087 CAPABILITY Categories for Basic Natural Capability Assessing Comments Elements, Values or Features Capability Comments Comments Comments Acidified streams (non-limestone streams) No No No No Presence of structural improvements Nature Camp No No 2 communication sites near NNW bdy Private inholdings No No No No Subdivisions adjacent to PWA boundary Yes No Yes No Est. percent of boundary beside pvt lands 20-25% 20-25% 80% 80% Other evidence of human Adjacent to SP with high density trail improvements improvements and human habitation Nature dominates;Nature substantially of free habitation or use No No system No Opportunities for primitive recreation, solitude, physical and 9,500 ac SP in mass; good opps for mental challenge, inspiration Not very good. About 7,000 ac of SP, but isolation and primitive rec; many narrow and along mountainside with mult knobs around perimeter help block 4,400 ac SP in central W; none on N & S; Relatively small core of 4,440 ac SP, but is ext views to pvt - cabins, farms, camps; views to private lands and potential int opps but relatively small in mass with int views in steep drains. poor configuration. future development Other pros or cons to opps for primitive rec and solitude No No primitive, unconfinedprimitive, recreation Opportunities for solitude Opportunitiesand solitude for No No National or regional heritage/historic values No No No No Presence of TESLR species, FS sensitive species or species found No No Roughhead shiner No only here that DO NOT need active management Presence of old growth stands (FS data; see also Va Mtn Treasures comments below) No No No Yes, per SELC report Presence of special area (NRT, RNA, etc) No No Rec River No Presence of special geologic area No No No No Native brook trout stream(s), miles 5 mi.
[Show full text]