Contributions of Historic Preservation TO QUALITY OF LIFE OF FLORIDIANS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Center for Governmental Responsibility, University of Florida Levin College of Law • Department of Urban and Regional Planning, UF College of Design, Construction and Planning • Center for Tourism Research and Development, UF College of Health and Human Performance Department of Museum Studies, UF College of Fine Arts • Florida Trust for Historic Preservation In the preamble to the National Historic Preservation Act Congress found that the preservation of America’s heritage “is in the public interest so that its vital legacy of cultural, educational, aesthetic, inspirational, economic and energy benefits will be maintained and enriched for future generations of Americans.” In other words, in 1966, Congress was convinced that the American public’s “quality of life” would improve as an indigenous part of the preser- vation of its historic towns and neighborhoods. Four decades later, National Trust for Historic Preservation President Richard Moe opened the annual conference with remarks that re-confirmed that organization’s concern for “quality of life” and how preservation, if properly integrated, can better our communities.
Recently, Donovan Rypkema, one of the nation’s foremost preservation planners made the observation about newly revitalized historic areas that not long ago were nearly dead: “I do not know of a single sustained success story in downtown revitalization anywhere in the US where restoration (preservation) was not a key component of the effort. That doesn’t mean it isn’t theoretically possible to have downtown revitalization but no restoration, but I don’t know about it, I haven’t read about it, I haven’t seen it.”
Indeed, the well-being and potential for the recycling of older communities is an increasing concern in states such as Florida in all aspects of urban and regional planning. For some time, preservationists have suspected that there is a real connection with a tangible and elusive community spirit that rises from a sense of place often associated with unique neighborhoods, whether they qualify for the National Register of Historic Places, or not. It just so happens that recognized neighborhoods have one up on those that do not have that identity.
By understanding how this connection works, we can see the means to maintain the cultural and historical qualities that contribute to Florida's older neighborhoods while also meeting the needs of quality living and housing. As this study shows, quality of life is now being measured from all angles; its quantifiable qualities can in large part include standard of living, economic and housing opportunities, as well as access to goods and services. Quality of life can also encompass freedom, happiness, creativity and artistic impression, environment, and health; qualities that are far harder to measure.
Although in the past historic preservation has too often been seen as a separate and prior activity that prepares the way for the improvement of neighborhoods, we know now that revitalization requires that historic sites be given a role in the life of the community. The point is not to place the community’s historic assets under lock and key, but to integrate them safely and evenly into the fabric of everyday life. Local residents can benefit through outdoor markets, handicrafts, houses, cuisine, businesses, civic and religious centers, and interpretive components such as learning and recreational activities that complement an historic site’s didactic offerings and convey a special meaning between its past, present and future. The more the community is involved, the more successful and inviting the area will become for everyone.
Because of this overlap in the relationship between better quality of life and historic preservation, when properly integrated into planning, this very much needed report exploring these conditions will help in developing an integrated approach to planning for historic and other uniquely special communities in Florida. It is a worthy com- panion to the previously published “Economic Impacts of Historic Preservation in Florida”.
Roy Eugene Graham, FAIA, Fellow US/ICOMOS Beinecke-Reeves Distinguished Professor Director, College Preservation Programs, School of Architecture, College of Design, Construction and Planning University of Florida SEPTEMBER 2006
Contributions of Historic Preservation TO QUALITY OF LIFE OF FLORIDIANS
CHAPTER 1 PAGE 4 Introduction & Overview
CHAPTER 2 PAGE 10 Quality of Life Indicators
CHAPTER 3 PAGE 14 Preservation Laws & Policies
CHAPTER 4 PAGE 20 Heritage Tourism
CHAPTER 5 PAGE 24 History Museums
CHAPTER 6 PAGE 28 Historic and Affordable Housing
CHAPTER 7 PAGE 34 Acknowledgements
Authors/Editors: Responsibility, of the Graduate Program in Timothy McLendon University of Florida Museum Studies, Staff Attorney, Levin College of Law University of Florida Center for Governmental Rhonda Phillips, Ph.D., AICP Lori Pennington-Gray, Ph.D. Responsibility, CEcD, Director Center Center for Tourism University of Florida for Building Better Research and Development Levin College of Law Communities Associate College of Health and Professor, Urban and Human Performance, Kristin Larsen, Ph.D. Regional Planning University of Florida AICP, Assistant Professor Department College of Department of Urban and Design, Construction and John Confer, Ph.D. Regional Planning, Photos: COVER (clockwise from top left) Mission San Luis, Tallahassee, Planning, University of Florida Center for Tourism University of Florida Research and Development winner of the 2006 “Preserve America” Presidential Award for Heritage Tourism, presented at the White House; Miami Beach Art Deco District: Glenn Willumson, Ph.D. College of Health and JoAnn Klein Lake Mirror Wall, Lakeland; and Mount Dora’s Historic District. TABLE OF Human Performance, Development Director, Associate Professor of CONTENTS: Cà d’Zan, Ringling Estate, Sarasota. BACK COVER: Ybor City. University of Florida Center for Governmental Art History Director 4 St. Augustine 1 Introduction & Overview The State of Florida’s heritage, whether in Historical Commission and the Division of Historical Resources in archeological resources, historic structures, sites, and the Florida Department of State. This report, a collaboration of districts, spans the entire era of human settlement: four different colleges of the University of Florida and a non- • Indian Mounds intangible characteristics of Florida’s profit organization specializing in • 18th century Spanish colonial historic places. historic preservation, is a follow-up • Cracker structures of the 19th Florida’s elected officials have to a 2002 report on the “Economic century directly addressed the significance of Impacts of Historic Preservation in • Bungalows and chert houses of the historic preservation to the quality of Florida”, with the same sponsors early 20th century life in the State of Florida, finding that: and some of the same research team • The distinctive modern style of the “The rich and unique heritage of members. The two studies differ in Sarasota School of Architecture historic properties in that the economic • Roadside structures and sites such this state, represent- impacts study was as the early theme parks ing more than 10,000 derived from a quan- • 1950s ranch houses that are just years of human titative review of now becoming eligible for listing presence, is an impor- available data related on the National, and many local, tant legacy to be to historic preserva- registers. valued and conserved tion. That study The heritage of our past and the for present and offered a statewide productive and respectful use of future generations. analysis of historic such historic places in the present The destruction of preservation activity strengthen the quality of life for the these nonrenewable in Florida. It exam- future of our state. Identifying what historical resources ined direct and multi- is distinctive and shared about this will engender a signif- plier effects from heritage is essential to understand- icant loss to the investment in historic ing how historic preservation con- state's quality of life, preservation through- tributes to the quality of life in economy, and cultural out the state in such Florida. environment.” (FLA. STAT. § 267.01(1)(A)) activities as historic rehabilitation of What is the relationship between This report, “Contributions of all types of properties, heritage historic preservation and quality of Historic Preservation to the Quality tourism, Main Street investment, life? Historic preservation con- of Life of Floridians”, represents the grants programs, tax credits and tributes to economic and cultural first statewide study of how historic museum operations. values in the State of Florida. Those preservation fits into the overall The quality of life study, con- cultural values are reflected in the quality of life in Florida. The report tained in this Executive Summary, quality of life found in the state’s includes models and tools available while reviewing many of the same communities from small towns to to further historic preservation in programs available in Florida in the large urban areas. Florida and to measure the impact field of historic preservation, pres- Quality of life is a vague term of historical structures, events, and ents a qualitative analysis. Explicit with multiple meanings. As used in related activities on the enhance- measuring that results in a definitive this paper, it relates to the sense of ment of the quality of life in Florida. number or dollar amount is not eas- place created by the tangible and It is sponsored by the Florida ily ascertainable for quality of life.
CONTRIBUTIONS OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION TO QUALITY OF LIFE OF FLORIDIANS 5 While measuring economic impacts can be approached from a statewide level, quality of life evaluations occur more often at the local level. Measuring quality of life occurs in people’s perceptions and enjoyment of their state and communi- ties. It looks at the physical environment but also the cultural aspects of the com- munity. Defining quality of life issues includes several components, including historic preservation. How does historic preservation impact the livability of a city or a community? The challenge posed in this research was identifying, developing, or applying previously developed methods for assess- ing the impact of historic preservation on the quality of life in Florida’s communi- ties. The value of this report is to assist individuals, neighborhoods, and commu- nities in identifying creative methods for DeFuniak Springs fostering historic preservation and for measuring its contribution to the quality ome of the most lovingly preserved and picturesque downtowns are of life in an area. found in Florida’s small towns. For sheer harmony and grace, DeFuniak A 2005-2006 survey found that Florida Springs may be the state’s most unspoiled city” (Mormino 2005: 40). residents are aware of their historic S DeFuniak Springs shares a great deal with many other Florida cities resources (roughly 55% of 1505 respon- – it was founded in the late nineteenth century when a variety of people were dents had visited a historic site in the past attracted to the state by a stream of publications that celebrated Florida’s exotic year) and value the role that historic landscape. As in many towns founded at this time, the railroad played a pivotal preservation plays in the state of Florida. role; and development concentrated around the city’s spring-fed lake and reflect- Specifically, preservation is valued for what ed a mix of low density commercial, govern- mental, religious, and residential structures in it can contribute to future generations the vernacular and late Victorian styles that (24%), for aesthetic reasons (17%), for typified the era. educational reasons (14%), and for envi- What is distinctive about DeFuniak ronmental reasons (13%) (see Russin in Springs is its sense of place reinforced by its Technical Document to this work). social history – connected to the Chautauqua Institute founded in 1869 in New York State. QUALITY OF LIFE & HISTORICAL From its first assembly in 1885 until the early PRESERVATION COMPONENTS 1930s, DeFuniak Springs functioned as the Researchers in this study examined southernmost home of the adult education movement that endorsed learning in a historic preservation’s impact on Florida’s pleasing natural and built environment to uplift the intellect and the spirit. quality of life in five key areas: In 1902, nationally prominent architects were hired to develop a plan to make the settlement into a model town. The layout – a public park surrounding the lake with public buildings interspersed in the landscape bounded by a street from Quality of Life Indicators which axial roads extend – makes the lake the town’s centerpiece. While homes Community indicators allow us to predominantly sit across the lakefront drive, the nearby railroad station forms the explore the relationship between his- center of the town’s commercial district. This core area of the historic town was toric preservation and quality of life, listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1992. expressed in terms of explicit outcomes. Community indicators are bits of infor-
6 CONTRIBUTIONS OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION TO QUALITY OF LIFE OF FLORIDIANS mation that when combined, provide a picture of what is happening local- ly. Quality of life is reflective of the values that exist in a community, and indicators can be used to identi- fy and promote a particular set of val- ues. This chapter includes a chart of indicators to use in gauging, protect- ing, enhancing, and interfacing with historic preservation. The research also provides recommendations for implementing the framework through monitoring and measuring of the indicators. The Northeast Florida community of Fernandina Beach is offered as a case study of how economic develop- ment and historic preservation can be compatible and integrated to provide desirable outcomes while protecting a community’s valuable resources.
Preservation Laws & Policies Laws and policies reflect the pri- orities of a democratic society. They Milton Riverwalk restrict things deemed harmful and seek to promote actions that are Heritage Tourism History Museums viewed as beneficial. Historic preser- Historic preservation and heritage The most obvious impact of history vation laws reflect a decision by pol- tourism support one another. Historic museums on the citizens of Florida is icy makers that our heritage, preservation provides the setting, the the effect they have on the education whether national or local, is signifi- history, the persona, and the tradi- of the state’s children. Arguably, the cant and should be preserved for tions for heritage tourism; heritage central mission of history museums is future generations. tourism provides the opportunity to to preserve the past for local audi- This chapter discussed the two educate, enjoy, and appreciate historic types of laws and policies that pro- preservation. mote historic preservation: regula- The chapter on heritage tourism tions and incentives. examines a county’s quality of her- Community programs that are itage tourism by evaluating the per- described in this chapter include: mit- centage of annual tourist-related tax igation efforts to protect historic revenue allocated for historic preser- resources in an interstate widening in vation by looking at the lodging Tampa; the Bridge of Lions rehabilita- tax. The researchers examined three tion in St. Augustine; adaptive reuse case studies of use of lodging tax, of an old church in Tampa Heights; including: Emerson Apartments rehabilitation and Pennsylvania Hotel rehabilita- • Suwanee County tion, both in St. Petersburg; and proj- • Monroe County ects enabled by state grants and the • St. Johns County Florida Main Street Program. Palm Beach
CONTRIBUTIONS OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION TO QUALITY OF LIFE OF FLORIDIANS 7 ences. The chapter on history muse- lenges to affordability. The chapter Specific case studies examine the ums assesses history museums’ effect on affordable housing identifies cre- use of Conservation Districts in on three areas of quality of life: ative solutions to conflicts of gentri- Zephyrhills, Tampa, Miami and • Education fication, sustainability, and rehabili- Sarasota, as well as an investigation • Community tation. of a Community Land Trust in Key • Economy What tools then are available to West. meet these goals, specifically to Within these five areas, The researchers examine three case attract the private sector to under- researchers identified quality of life studies that represent a broad spec- take such rehabilitation projects? indicators that could be used to trum of Florida historic museums: Among them are building codes that determine how that component con- 1. St. Augustine Lighthouse and accommodate rehabilitation, neigh- tributed positively to a community. Museum, a large history museum borhood conservation districts to Individual case studies were selected 2. Fort Christmas Historical Park in complement local historic districts, to illustrate how to evaluate quality Central Florida, a small history community land trusts, expansion of of life indicators. In order to include museum in a rural area. existing revitalization programs such public perceptions of the relation- 3. Riley House Museum, a small his- as Front Porch Florida, the historic ship between historic preservation tory museum near Tallahassee, spe- rehabilitation tax credit combined and quality of life, researchers com- cializing in a particular topic with the low-income housing tax missioned a three-month-long sur- credit, preservation easements, vey of the attitudes of Floridians in Historic and Affordable Housing revolving loan funds, property tax regard to these topics. Housing affordability and his- relief to address increased property toric resources can mutually co-exist values due to historic designation, SURVEY FINDINGS in neighborhoods and communities, and coordinated planning to proac- To better gauge public perceptions though the rehabilitation of deterio- tively address potential challenges of the relationship between historic rated houses may indeed pose chal- such as gentrification. preservation and quality of life,
Bridge of Lions, St. Augustine
8 CONTRIBUTIONS OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION TO QUALITY OF LIFE OF FLORIDIANS Which historic resources in Florida are the most threatened?
3% 8% 17%
12%
8%
3%
21% 21%
7% Old downtowns among most threatened 17% Public buildings among most threatened 8% Old homes and neighborhoods among most threatened 21% Old schools among most threatened 7% Historic and scenic landscape among most threatened 21% Old industrial sites among most threatened 3% Archeological sites among most threatened 12% Other 8% Don’t Know 3%
What are the most important reasons to preserve Florida’s historic resources? 2% 1% 10% Harriett Beecher Stowe House, Mandarin 17% 9% researchers commissioned a three- toric and scenic landscapes (21%); 4% month-long survey of the attitudes of old homes and neighborhoods 13% 6% Floridians in regard to these topics. A (21%); and old downtowns (17%). random sample of more than 1,500 2. Respondents said the most important 14% Floridians was interviewed during a reasons to preserve Florida’s historic 24% period between November, 2005, and resources are, in order, for future Scenic among most important reasons January, 2006. The survey was con- generations (24%); scenic reasons to preserve 17% ducted by the University of Florida (17%); and education (14%). Affordable housing among most important reasons to preserve 4% Survey Research Center, the research These findings would appear to Economic redevelopment among most and service unit of the Bureau of indicate that the Floridians surveyed important reasons to preserve 6% Economic and Business Research at the have an appreciation for historic Education among most important reasons to preserve 14% University of Florida. resources and see a need to preserve For future generations among most important The complete findings of the sur- them for the future. reasons to preserve 24% vey are included in the technical doc- The following chapters detail how Environmental reasons among most important 13% ument that accompanies this each component of historic preserva- reasons to preserve Sense of place among most important reasons Executive Summary. tion can be measured to determine its to preserve 9% Two key findings emerged that are impact on quality of life in Florida. Promote tourism among most important relevant to this project. Detailed descriptions of each of these reasons to preserve 10% Other 2% 1. Respondents identified what they programs are included in the Don’t Know 1% see as Florida’s most threatened Technical Report that supplements historic resources as, in order: his- this Executive Summary.
CONTRIBUTIONS OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION TO QUALITY OF LIFE OF FLORIDIANS 9 10 Defuniak Springs 2
Quality of Life Indicators
Historic preservation provides numerous benefits, measures of aspects of places, such as job growth, per capita income, or including a profound and positive affect on quality housing prices? The key is develop- ing an integrative approach – one of life for citizens and visitors alike. that considers the impacts of change not only in economic terms, but also There are numerous references to This report presents a the social/cultural and quality of life in historic preserva- framework for explor- environmental dimen- tion documents, in all types of liter- ing the relationship sions. A community ature – popular press, academic, and between quality of life indicators system practitioner related works. Quality and historic preserva- reflects collective val- of life is assumed to be an intrinsi- tion, using communi- ues, providing a more cally valuable outcome of historic ty indicators. powerful evaluative preservation efforts, yet there are not tool than simply con- 1 many evident attempts to express INDICATORS sidering the ‘econom- this relationship explicitly. It is this What is the appeal of ics’ of change and implicit, assumed nature that pro- indicators? When growth. By integrat- vides the research opportunity at used as a system, they ing an indicators sys- hand: what is the strength of this hold much promise as tem into overall com- relationship, expressed in terms of an evaluation tool. What makes munity or regional planning, it will explicit outcomes such as impacts? indicators any different from other be easier to evaluate the impacts of
Micanopy
CONTRIBUTIONS OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION TO QUALITY OF LIFE OF FLORIDIANS 11 Fernandina Beach
ernandina Beach is located on Amelia Island, a coastal barrier island along the northeastern Florida coast. F It is one of three incorporat- ed areas in Nassau County and con- tains many of the area’s historic prop- erties. Its rich history includes the dis- tinction of being the last town platted by the Spanish before they ceded Florida to the United States in the early 1800’s. As one of the oldest set- tlements in Florida, it offers a charm- ing Victorian seaside setting. Fernandina Beach was named "One of a Dozen Distinctive Destinations Worth Discovering" in 2002 by the National Trust for Historic Preservation. Given its expansive his- toric resources, it provides an excel- lent case study of how economic Fernandina Beach that together con- Some issues have emerged that development and historic preserva- tain 336 historic buildings. The dis- the City of Fernandina Beach and tion can be compatible and integrat- tricts are: others concerned with protecting ed to provide the community desir- 1. Downtown Historic District – This their historic resources will need to able outcomes while protecting valu- district, the Fernandina Beach consider. One of these is that the able resources. Historic District, is a result of devel- rapid rise in market values of the Fernandina Beach has a rich his- opment of Fernandina in its “new” properties can have some chilling toric fabric that for decades in the location to the south of Old Town effects on business activity, if prop- early and mid-20th century did not Fernandina after the mid-19th cen- erty tax bills rise too high for local receive development pressures like tury. businesses to support. It also other Atlantic coastal towns in 2. Old Town – This district encom- impacts new property tax assess- Florida. This turned out to be very passes the original settlement area ments for buyers when a property is fortuitous for present day outcomes for Fernandina Beach and abuts the sold and may indicate that small, – because of its relative isolation waters of Amelia River. unique businesses could not afford away from the rapid build-up areas, The City of Fernandina Beach has to pursue new opportunities. A key the city was able to preserve its his- benefited tremendously from its his- to preserving the quality and charac- toric fabric. By the late 1960’s, some toric resources and by pursuing ter of a unique place like Fernandina began to realize what treasures preservation-led strategies for eco- Beach will be to address this and these historic resources represented nomic development. Its downtown other issues to maintain balanced and initiated efforts to revitalize and district is a major attraction for many and sustainable preservation-based preserve them. They realized that tourists each year and offers a unique development. the resources represented a basis on and quaint experience that is different This case illustrates that econom- which to build a tourism industry from many coastal towns where all ic development and historic preser- and the basis for desirable economic the same chain stores may exist and vation are indeed compatible and development outcomes. Actually, newer buildings are the standard. It is can serve as a valuable basis on Fernandina Beach “rebuilt” a indeed a charming Victorian era sea- which to build and enhance a local tourism industry because in the late side town and has done a commend- economy. By preserving historic 1800’s, the city was a well recog- able job of preserving its historic resources and enhancing their use nized tourist destination, promoted resources to date. They have a con- and appeal, development outcomes and renowned by many as the siderable number of historic proper- can be realized that benefit not only "Newport of the South" (referring to ties to work with and as discussed in the economic aspects but also the Newport, Rhode Island, as a popular the subsequent section, they have social and cultural dimensions with seaport resort town). garnered economic gains that are provision of a unique and desirable There are two historic districts in quite impressive for a small city. community.
12 CONTRIBUTIONS OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION TO QUALITY OF LIFE OF FLORIDIANS changes, whether positive, negative indicators are bits of information or neutral. It is this ability of com- that, when combined, generate a munity indicators systems to be picture of what is happening in a integrated as a system for gauging local or regional system. It is impor- impacts across a full spectrum of tant to note that these systems gen- outcomes that makes it beneficial to erate much data and it is the analy- explore using them. Further, indica- sis of these data that can be used in tors incorporate both frameworks of the decision-making and policy/pro- performance and process outcomes, gram improvement process. There which serve to facilitate evaluation. are numerous functions of indica- When properly integrated, indica- tors, including: description, simpli- tors hold the potential to go beyond fication, measurement, trend identi- Indicator Framework
just activity reports, to being utilized fication, communication, clarifica- The following table presents a list of the in the decision-making process as tion, and as catalysts for action. indicators selected to calibrate the frame- indicators of impacts and outcomes. work. They are divided into four categories: gauging (related to type and amount); There are four common frame- protecting (ordinances and regulations); Just what is a community indicator? works used for developing and enhancing (partnerships and incentives); and interfacing (uses). Essentially, community indicators implementing community indica- are bits of information that when tors systems in the U.S.: 1. Quality A. Gauging combined, provide a picture of what of Life, 2. Performance Evaluation, These indicators are related to the amount and is happening in a local system. They 3. Healthy Communities, and 4. type of historic resources in the community. provide insight into the direction of Sustainability. The framework pre- • Historic fabric • Rehabilitation/ • Districts, structures, certified tax credits a community: improving or declin- sented most closely follows the landmarks • Assessed property ing, forward or backward, increasing quality of life format. • Distressed historic value trends neighborhoods • Historic district/ or decreasing. Combining indicators property reinvestment 1. This section is excerpted in part from provides a measuring system to pro- Community Indicators, Rhonda Phillips, B. Protecting vide clear and honest information American Planning Association, PAS Report No. 517, 2003. about past trends, current realities, These indicators are ordinances and regulations. and future direction, in order to aid 2. Hoernig and Seasons, 2005. “Understanding • Historic preservation • Preservation ordinances Indicators,” in Community Indicators element/plan • Historic preservation decision-making. Community indi- Measuring Systems, Rhonda Phillips, ed., p. 5, integration survey cators can also be thought of as a London: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. • Design guidelines • Historic preservation • Historic preservation staff report card of community well commission • Certificates and being. Bottom line: Community enforcement actions
C. Enhancing
These indicators are related to partnerships and incentives. • Main Street program • Neighborhood • Certified Local participation Government • Civic/museum • Participation in other partnerships state/federal programs • Tax exemptions • Historic preservation • Other incentive non-profits programs
D. Interfacing
These indicators are related to the uses of property. • Housing affordability • Community use factors • Business use • Heritage/cultural • Community draw interactions factors Pensacola
CONTRIBUTIONS OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION TO QUALITY OF LIFE OF FLORIDIANS 13 14 Biltmore Hotel, Coral Gables 3
Preservation Laws & Policies
privately-owned historic properties. In a democratic society, our laws and policies ulti- The 52 Florida communities recog- mately reflect our priorities. Thus, we restrict nized as certified local governments each have local programs certified as things deemed harmful and seek to promote things meeting basic standards in the expertise of their preservation that are viewed as beneficial. Historic preservation boards, the standards required for designating historic districts and laws reflect a decision by policy makers that our landmarks, and the adoption of guidelines to protect historic neigh- heritage, whether national or local, is significant borhoods. Regulatory laws may also control and should be preserved for future generations. a process (i.e. obliging federal or state agencies to consider Historic resources have a value that appropriate, especially where there the impacts of their undertakings can be seen as aesthetic and educa- are numerous vacant lots. The revi- on historic resources). tional, in addition to whatever eco- talization that accom- Thus, under Section nomic value they may have. There are panies an ongoing 106 of the National two types of laws and policies that historic preservation Historic Preservation promote historic preservation: regula- program can also con- Act, federal agencies tions and incentives. tribute to increased must consider the public safety as vacant effects of federal or How do Historic Preservation buildings become federally funded proj- Laws contribute to Quality of Life? inhabited homes and ects on historic Historic preservation programs can businesses. resources. Similar be a key piece of community revital- procedural considera- ization, as well as an important part Types of Historic tions are required of maintaining the property and Preservation Laws by the National character of local historic neighbor- Regulatory historic Environmental Policy hoods. Historic districts typically preservation laws may Act and Section 4(f) require maintenance of property, mandate a specific of the Transportation thus preventing properties from substantive result (i.e. preservation Act. These acts require notification becoming derelict. Historic tax of the historic resource). For exam- of federal and state historic credits and tax exemptions can ple local ordinances allow for the preservation officers about possible foster the restoration of decayed designation of certain properties or impacts on historic resources historic buildings, whether in down- neighborhoods as historic, and then and allow them time to provide towns or residential neighborhoods. authorize restrictions on the appear- comments and suggestions about Historic districts need not be frozen ance or demolition of historic prop- alternative approaches which will in time. Indeed, sensitive infill erties. These local laws are the most minimize any harm to historic development is often necessary and important element in preserving resources.
CONTRIBUTIONS OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION TO QUALITY OF LIFE OF FLORIDIANS 15 Incentives to promote Historic Preservation Incentives, on the other hand, encour- age preservation by providing some tangi- ble benefit. These benefits may include tax relief, grants or relief from certain regulato- ry or procedural burdens. The benefit may be simple recognition of the historic importance of a structure or neighbor- hood, as is provided by the National Register of Historic Places or the National Historic Landmarks. Florida currently has more than 1,500 sites and districts on the National Register. This recognition may entitle properties to further benefits. For example, those ADAPTIVE REUSE OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES: whose rehabilitation of income-producing historic properties is certified to be in con- Tampa Heights Sanctuary Lofts formity with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, may receive his former Methodist Church, located in Tampa Heights north of down- the Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit, a tax town, was originally built in 1910, and a Sunday school facility was credit of up to 20% of the value of the added in 1927. When the congregation moved to another facility in rehabilitation work. Since 1986, nearly T 1998, the historic building was left vacant. A group of investors, led by 450 Florida tax credit projects representing Andrew Ham of Urban Trust, LLC, saw an opportunity to restore the building as a some $556 million in construction have combination office/apartment complex. A partnership of several investors and the been approved by the National Park City of Tampa acquired the property and arranged financing. The federal rehabil- Service. itation tax credit, a 20 % tax credit for rehabilitation of historic properties, made Local governments raise much of their the $3.1 million construction project possible. revenues through property taxes. The will- The rehabilitation of the Greek Revival building had to be certified by the ingness of counties and/or municipalities National Park Service as complying with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards to forego some revenues in the form of tax for Rehabilitation. Following these standards, developers retained the building’s exemptions can serve as an encourage- historic features, including the outer ment to property owners to invest in and walls, stained glass, hardwood floors, rehabilitate their properties. Three types of original corridors and the interior space local tax exemptions are possible in of the former sanctuary. The Sunday Florida. The first allows exemptions from School building was became 32 residen- property taxes for up to 50% of the tial loft units with 12 foot ceilings, large assessed value of property that is: 1) used windows and original architectural for commercial purposes or by a non-prof- features. The former sanctuary was it organization; 2) listed in the National developed as 4,000 square feet of office Register, designated as a local landmark or space with a view to the dome overhead. part of a National Register or local historic The new Sanctuary Lofts is one of the district; and 3) regularly open to the pub- first residential loft projects undertaken lic.1 The second, most common type of in Tampa. The project benefited from a $100,000 loan from the City to acquire the exemption, allows for a ten-year exemp- property, and from $497,408 in rehabilitation tax credits. The result is attractive tion of the value by which historic proper- living and working space near downtown, and a model for adaptive reuse of ties are improved by rehabilitation.2 A final historic buildings. exemption allows a total property tax exemption where rehabilitated historic properties are used for nonprofit or gov-
16 CONTRIBUTIONS OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION TO QUALITY OF LIFE OF FLORIDIANS Merrill House, Jacksonville
ernmental purposes and where the INCENTIVES TO PROMOTE building is open to the public.3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION: Florida communities increasingly make use of these tax incentives: in St. Petersburg 2005, over $137 million worth of Emerson Apartments property was exempt from ad valorem Restored in 2005 taxes due to these three types of his- toric tax exemptions.4 RESTORATION NON RESTORATION Grants are a further important Soft Costs $ 215,000 Soft Costs $215.000 incentive to preserve historic proper- Historic Construct. $ 815,000 Non Historic Construct. $675,000 ties. The federal government provides (72 S.F.) $ 1,030,000 (60 S.F.) $890,000 grants under the Save America’s Total Development $ 1,030,000 Total Development $890,000 Cost (92 S.F.) Cost (78 S.F.) Treasures program to preserve some of the most important landmarks in PRESERVATION INCENTIVES NO INCENTIVES Florida. Under this program since Fed Tax Credits 20% $ 163,000 Fed Tax Credits 20% $ 0 1999, thirteen Florida projects have Ad Valorem Tax $ 815,000 Ad Valorem Tax $ 0 Exemption ($407,000) Exemption ($407,000) been funded by Save America’s TDRs @ $10 S.F. $ 150,000 TDRs @ $10 S.F. $ 0 Treasures, including $353,000 for Facade Easement $75,000 Facade Easement $ 0 preservation at the Ringling estate of Cà d’Zan in Sarasota, $795,000 for Annual Property Taxes $ 6,300 Annual Property Taxes $ 6,300 Net Development Cost $ 588,674 Net Development Cost $ 890,000 preservation work at the Biltmore ($52 s.f.) ($80 s.f.) Hotel in Coral Gables and $450,000
to preserve the Singing Tower at the Provided by Bob Jeffrey, City of St. Petersburg Bok Sanctuary in Lake Wales.5
CONTRIBUTIONS OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION TO QUALITY OF LIFE OF FLORIDIANS 17 Florida Historical Grants
$35,000,000.00 250
$30,000,000.00 200 $25,000,000.00 150 $20,000,000.00
$15,000,000.00 100 TOTAL AMOUNT TOTAL
$10,000,000.00 NO. OF PROJECTS 50 $5,000,000.00
$0.00 0 ’01 ’02 ’03 ’04 ’05 ’06 Year