Osprey Report 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Osprey Report 2018 Audubon Society of Rhode Island RHODE ISLAND OSPREY REPORT Volume 9 · 2018 The Rhode Island Osprey Monitoring Program Inside this Issue: The Osprey Monitoring Program was who have observed all known Osprey initiated in 1977 by the Rhode Island nests in Rhode Island and carefully re- RI Osprey Program 1 Department of Environmental corded data on the number of checks Management (RIDEM). The goal was to fledged and status of each nest. Summary of Results 2-3 carefully follow the state Osprey In 2009 no results were available and in population as it recovered from the ef- Osprey Monitors 4 2010 RIDEM passed management of the fects of the pesticide DDT used from the project to the Audubon Society of Rhode 2018 RI Program Results 5-15 1940s through the 60s in Rhode Island. Island. Today, nearly 100 volunteer RI Osprey Distribution 16 Although DDT had been banned in 1972, monitors continue to observe the state’s 2018 MA Program Results 16 the chemical was still having a negative Osprey population. effect on the raptor population. In 1976 By watching these sentinels, we learn Osprey Program 17 Osprey were designated as an endangered more about wildlife and natural habitats species. The first statewide count by About Audubon 17 as well as the level of human impact on RIDEM in 1977 yielded only 12 active these special places and unique species. nests. In the 1940s, before DDT, it was estimated that there were over a thousand It is a great testament to the dedication of nests between Boston and New York. Audubon’s volunteer monitors that this citizen-science program continues to DDT had taken a major toll on the thrive. population of this fish-eating bird. The poison worked its way through the food If you have questions regarding this re- chain, bio-accumulating in Osprey. The port or the program please direct them to result was very weak eggshells which Jon Scoones, manager of the RI Osprey easily broke when incubated. Monitoring Program. Since 1977 the Osprey Monitoring Program has been made possible by ef- forts of biologists, donors and volunteers Photo #1: Whiterock Rd, Charlestown, 7/2018 M. Bonafede Photo #2: Barrington, 7/2018 R. Abdullah Rhode Island Osprey Report 2018 Summary of Monitoring Results Throughout the 2018 Osprey breeding 2017 & 2018 RI Osprey Data 2017 2018 Change season, Audubon Society Osprey monitors Monitors 110 93 -17 volunteered over 1,000 hours observing Hours Monitored 1340 1,066 -274 193 nests across 30 communities in Rhode Nest Sites with Insufficient Data 38 42 +4 Island. Nest Sites with Data 267 193 -71 An additional 42 nests were not monitored Inactive Nest Sites 57 21 -36 or not enough data was obtained to be Housekeeping Nests 24 6 -18 conclusive. Six nests were classified as housekeeping and another 21 were classi- Active Nests 145 166 +21 fied as inactive. Of the 166 nests deemed Successful Nests *Subset of Active Nests 121 144 +23 active, 144 were successful, producing at Fledglings in Rhode Island 226 275 +49 least one fledgling. The number of nests termed active and successful continue the gradual increase shown over the life of the program. The number of fledglings in 2018 has risen dramatically since 2014, supporting the hypothesis that Rhode Island provides the habitat and food necessary to support Osprey. For details regarding nests in Rhode Island refer to pages 5-15. Photo #3: Breach Dr. 7/2018 M. Bonafede Photo #4: Tiverton DPW 8/2018 L. Mendes Massachussetts: A total of 11 nest sites were monitored in Seekonk and Swansea, Massachusetts. Of the 11 sites, one was clas- sified as active, one had no nest and nine were classified as successful. A total of 14 fledglings were observed from these nests. For details regarding these nests refer to page 15. Glossary of Monitoring Terms Insufficient Data: Observations were inconclusive or no observations were made. Inactive: No breeding-related behavior was observed Housekeeping: Osprey pair observed at nest but breed- ing behavior not sustained. Active Nests: Mating and/or incubation behavior ob- served Successful: Fledgling (s) observed. This category is a subset of Active nests. Photo #5: Colt State Park, Bristol 8/2018 L. Mendes Fledgling: Young bird with flight feathers Page 2 Rhode Island Osprey Report Osprey Nest Status One goal of the Osprey Monitoring program is to determine the breeding status of Osprey nests across Rhode Island. Graph #1 below shows the breakdown of the nests in 2018 while graph # 2 shows the breakdown of active versus successful nests. 2018 RI OSPREY NEST STATUS 2018 ACTIVE VS. SUCCESSFUL NESTS IN RI Not Active = 21 9% 18% 3% Housekeeping = 6 9% 13% Successful = 144 Active Not Successful = 22 Active But Not Successful = 144 Successful = 22 Insufficient Data = 42 61% 87% Graph #1: 2018 Status of Osprey Nests in Rhode Island Graph #2: Active versus Successful Osprey Nests 1977 - 2018 Rhode Island Osprey Nest Data 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 1983 1997 2011 # OF ALL ACTIVE NESTS # OF SUCCESSFUL NESTS # FLEDGLINGS Graph #3: Osprey Observations 1977-2018 Graph #3 above compares Osprey nest observations over the life of the monitoring program. The number of active nests, successful nests and number of fledged young are included in the comparison. Since the program is based on citizen science, one must be careful when making assumptions from the data. Several factors (e.g. number of monitors, their time in the field and knowledge level) can impact the amount and accuracy of the data captured. That said, the longevity of the program, monitor training and consistent results indicate a clear pattern regarding the breeding success of the Osprey population. in Rhode Island. Page 3 Rhode Island Osprey Report Osprey Fledglings Tracking the number of fledglings produced from year to year is vital. Studies have estimated that the breed- ing rate needed to balance adult mortality in New England is between 0.8 and 1.0 fledged young per active nest. In 2018 nests monitored in Rhode Island had 1.66 fledglings per active nest and 1.48 fledglings per all nests monitored. These figures indicate strong population growth across the Ocean State. 2018 Osprey Breeding Success 2.50 1.92 2.00 1.66 1.48 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 As % of Nests As % of Active As % of Successful Monitored nests nests Graph #4: Number of fledglings observed since Audubon Graph #5: Fledglings as a percent of monitored nests. began managing the program. Volunteer Osprey Monitors in 2018 Throughout the 2018 breeding season (April-August), 93 volunteers reported on 204 nests (193 in Rhode Island and 11 in Massachussetts). Monitors submitted over 3,500 observations and tallied a total of 1,066 hours in the field. Most monitors spent approximately 25 hours in the field, while a few logged in over fifty hours! Audubon thanks all the volunteers for their continued support of the program. David Anderson Finn Brudevold Nancy Fullerton Jerry & Donna Macomber Tracy Silvia Mark Anderson Mary Jane Burgess Dave Fulton Tara McDonald Lily Sirpenski Mary Arakelian Gary Carlson Ted Furtado Bill McMullen Ihor Slabicky Jane & Dan Austin Marianne Chronley Susan & Ken Gebhardt Luis Mendes Betsy Staples Cindy Benevides Barbara Costa Ronald Gelineau Peter Nassoit Barbara S. Watts Fran Bergeron George Cunha Michael Gerhardt Jim ONeill Roberto Tornotore Lisa Betcher Michele Cyr Pat Glazer Elizabeth Paquette Bonnie Turano Charlie Biddle Laura DeAngelis Heather Gordon Jeannine Pelletier Tami VanSteeden Jessica Bishop Terry Dehm Claire Gruneberg Ronald Pelletier Darlene Walsh Lorena Boles Cindy Dibble Amy Hagan Margie & Mark Peppercorn Elliot Waterman Maura Bonafede Mary DiCecco Carolyn Hesdberg Erica Perry Robin Weber Lucille Boyce Irene Downs Jana Hesser Thomas Poirier Jean Whatley Meredith Brady Pierre Duval David Jones Matt Ruscher Susan Williamson David Briggs Susan Eriksen Lori Jones Susan Russo David Winsor Jane Brockway Debra Eubank Anna & Gary LeBlanc Teresa Sarli Barbara Wrona Susan Brouillette Nature Explorations Ann & George Lewis Jon Scoones Michael Browne Lynda Fish Butch Lombardi Barbara Sherman Gail Browning Val Fuchs Gordon MacDonald Susan Silvia Table #1: 2018 Audubon Society of Rhode Island Osprey Monitors Page 4 Rhode Island Osprey Report Osprey Nesting Activity in Rhode Island for 2018 Table #2 provides the activity data of every Osprey nest monitored in 2018. A glossary of status-related terms is located on page 2. 100 Acre Cove (Cove Ave) Barrington 1 0 0 Active 100 Acre Cove (Isl) Barrington 2 1 3 Successful 100 Acre Tongue S Barrington 1 1 3 Successful 131 Adam's Point Road Barrington 0 0 0 No Nest Adam's Pt. Barrington 0 1 0 Housekeeping Allins Cove E Barrington 0 U 1 Successful Allins Cove W Barrington 4 2 3 Successful Barrington H.S. Barrington 2 1 2 Successful Barrington YMCA Barrington 3 2 4 Successful Bourne Lane Barrington 3 3 0 Not Active Brickyard Pond Barrington 3 0 1 Successful Johannis Farm Midway Barrington 2 2 1 Successful Johannis Farm N Barrington 3 2 1 Successful Johannis Farm S Barrington 1 3 1 Successful Little Mussachuck Creek 1 Barrington 3 3 1 Successful Little Mussachuck Creek 2 Barrington 0 0 0 No Nest Nagtegaal Nest Barrington 0 0 1 Successful Osamequin Barrington 0 2 0 Housekeeping Rumstick Pt. Barrington 2 0 0 Active Smith's Cove Barrington 2 0 3 Successful Sowams Tree Nest Barrington 2 3 2 Successful Touisset Barrington U 0 0 Not Active WPRO Radio Tower Barrington
Recommended publications
  • T Fall In: Guide to RI’S Waterfalls, Swimmin’ Holes & More!
    Don’t Fall in: Guide To RI’s Waterfalls, Swimmin’ Holes & More! Dams/Waterfalls 1. Ashton and Albion Falls, Lincoln. A walkway and bike path runs along the Blackstone River, bejewelled by the historic Ashton and Albion dams. 2. & 3. Blackstone Dam and Blackstone Gorge, Blackstone Mass. Right over the border from North Smithfield, these attractions are known for their abundant wildlife and natural beauty. A rocky trail takes you past stone walls, woods and a sizeable hill, while a mile-long hike can bring you to the dam and gorge to breathe it all in. Accessed from Blackstone River & Canal Heritage State Park, County St, Blackstone, Mass. 4. Cascade Brook, Smithfield. This mile loop in the Ken Weber Conservation Area takes hikers to stone ruins and the high points in the area. About 100 yards from the trailhead, the path leads to a small, but brilliant waterfall. 5. Fisherville Brook Falls, Exeter. After a stop at the waterfall, this easy trail takes walkers to a few historic graves and dense woods. White pines and mini-waterfalls are also to be seen. 6. Georgiaville Dam and Gorge, Smithfield. This dam is a combination of a manmade dam and natural waterfall. To the right there is a short trail that leads to a small area that overlooks the gorge. 7. Harrisville Falls, Burrillville. The gorgeous dam is located in the heart of Harrisville. 8. Hunt’s Mills Falls, East Providence. This dam in the shape of a half moon creates a unique waterfall split in the middle by a huge rock.
    [Show full text]
  • NASCO Rivers Database Report by Jurisdiction
    NASCO Rivers Database Report By Jurisdiction Photos courtesy of: Lars Petter Hansen, Peter Hutchinson, Sergey Prusov and Gerald Chaput Printed: 17 Jan 2018 - 16:24 Jurisdiction: Canada Region/Province: Labrador Conservation Requirements (# fish) Catchment Length Flow Latitude Longitude Category Area (km2) (km) (m3/s) Total 1SW MSW Adlatok (Ugjoktok and Adlatok Bay) 550218 604120 W N Not Threatened With Loss 4952 River Adlavik Brook 545235 585811 W U Unknown 73 Aerial Pond Brook 542811 573415 W U Unknown Alexis River 523605 563140 W N Not Threatened With Loss 611 0.4808 Alkami Brook 545853 593401 W U Unknown Barge Bay Brook 514835 561242 W U Unknown Barry Barns Brook 520124 555641 W U Unknown Beaver Brook 544712 594742 W U Unknown Beaver River 534409 605640 W U Unknown 853 Berry Brook 540423 581210 W U Unknown Big Bight Brook 545937 590133 W U Unknown Big Brook 535502 571325 W U Unknown Big Brook (Double Mer) 540820 585508 W U Unknown Big Brook (Michaels River) 544109 574730 W N Not Threatened With Loss 427 Big Island Brook 550454 591205 W U Unknown NASCO Rivers Database Report Page 1 of 247 Jurisdiction: Canada Region/Province: Labrador Conservation Requirements (# fish) Catchment Length Flow Latitude Longitude Category Area (km2) (km) (m3/s) Total 1SW MSW Big River 545014 585613 W N Not Threatened With Loss Big River 533127 593958 W U Unknown Bills Brook 533004 561015 W U Unknown Birchy Narrows Brook (St. Michael's Bay) 524317 560325 W U Unknown Black Bay Brook 514644 562054 W U Unknown Black Bear River 531800 555525 W N Not Threatened
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey
    imiF.NT OF Tim BULLETIN UN ITKI) STATKS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY No. 115 A (lECKJKAPHIC DKTIOXARY OF KHODK ISLAM; WASHINGTON GOVKRNMKNT PRINTING OFF1OK 181)4 LIBRARY CATALOGUE SLIPS. i United States. Department of the interior. (U. S. geological survey). Department of the interior | | Bulletin | of the | United States | geological survey | no. 115 | [Seal of the department] | Washington | government printing office | 1894 Second title: United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | | A | geographic dictionary | of | Rhode Island | by | Henry Gannett | [Vignette] | Washington | government printing office 11894 8°. 31 pp. Gannett (Henry). United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | | A | geographic dictionary | of | Khode Island | hy | Henry Gannett | [Vignette] Washington | government printing office | 1894 8°. 31 pp. [UNITED STATES. Department of the interior. (U. S. geological survey). Bulletin 115]. 8 United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | | * A | geographic dictionary | of | Ehode Island | by | Henry -| Gannett | [Vignette] | . g Washington | government printing office | 1894 JS 8°. 31pp. a* [UNITED STATES. Department of the interior. (Z7. S. geological survey). ~ . Bulletin 115]. ADVERTISEMENT. [Bulletin No. 115.] The publications of the United States Geological Survey are issued in accordance with the statute approved March 3, 1879, which declares that "The publications of the Geological Survey shall consist of the annual report of operations, geological and economic maps illustrating the resources and classification of the lands, and reports upon general and economic geology and paleontology. The annual report of operations of the Geological Survey shall accompany the annual report of the Secretary of the Interior. All special memoirs and reports of said Survey shall be issued in uniform quarto series if deemed necessary by tlie Director, but other­ wise in ordinary octavos.
    [Show full text]
  • Paddleri 2008 North Kingstown, RI 02852
    Rhode Island Blueways Alliance PO Box 1565 PaddleRI 2008 North Kingstown, RI 02852 Celebrating Paddling Chair: Keith Gonsalves On RI’s Rivers and Bay Vice Chair: Bruce Hooke Secretary: Terry Meyer Treasurer: Meg Kerr The PaddleRI 2008 celebration was a huge success with over 200 paddlers participating. PaddleRI was sponsored by the RI Blueways Alliance but the individual trips were organized and hosted by local organizations – watershed councils, Save the Bay and local conservation commissions. The celebration would not have been possible without their enthusiastic participation. The RI Blueways Alliance mission is to develop a water trail network linking Rhode Island’s rivers, lakes and ponds to Narragansett Bay and to use the trail to promote safety, conservation, recreation and economic development. PaddleRI 2008 celebrated the network of paddling opportunities that make up our water trail network. We would like to thank our sponsors -- the New England Grassroots Environmental Fund, the RI Resource Conservation & Development Area Council and the Rhode Island Foundation. Salt Ponds Spring Paddle - Ninigret Pond Saturday, May 31: The Salt Ponds Coalition’s trip was planned for May 31, but the paddle was postponed due to weather. On June 1, about 30 paddlers arrived at the US Fish & Wildlife kayak launch accessed through Ninigret Park at 8:30am with plans to get underway by 9:00am. But Mother Nature had other plans…. The fog was so thick that you couldn’t see where to paddle. Paddlers waited, listening to presentations by the US Fish & Wildlife Service and the Salt Pond’s Coalition’s Art Ganz, hoping for better conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • RI DEM/Water Resources
    STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Water Resources WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS July 2006 AUTHORITY: These regulations are adopted in accordance with Chapter 42-35 pursuant to Chapters 46-12 and 42-17.1 of the Rhode Island General Laws of 1956, as amended STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Water Resources WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS RULE 1. PURPOSE............................................................................................................ 1 RULE 2. LEGAL AUTHORITY ........................................................................................ 1 RULE 3. SUPERSEDED RULES ...................................................................................... 1 RULE 4. LIBERAL APPLICATION ................................................................................. 1 RULE 5. SEVERABILITY................................................................................................. 1 RULE 6. APPLICATION OF THESE REGULATIONS .................................................. 2 RULE 7. DEFINITIONS....................................................................................................... 2 RULE 8. SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS............................................... 10 RULE 9. EFFECT OF ACTIVITIES ON WATER QUALITY STANDARDS .............. 23 RULE 10. PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINING ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS, TREATMENT AND PRETREATMENT........... 24 RULE 11. PROHIBITED
    [Show full text]
  • Glacial Geology and Aquifer Characteristics of the Big River Area, Central Rhode Island
    U.S. Department of the Interior Stone and Dickerman U.S. Geological Survey Glacial Geology and Aquifer — Characteristics of the GLACIAL Big River Area, Central GEOLOGY Rhode Island AND AQUIFER CHARACTERISTICS OF By JANET RADWAY STONE and DAVID C. DICKERMAN Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4169 MASSACHUSETTS RHODE ISLAND CONNECTICUT THE BIG RIVER Big River Study Area AREA, CENTRAL RHODE ISLAND Prepared in cooperation with the RHODE ISLAND WATER RESOURCES BOARD — WRIR 01-4169 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Glacial Geology and Aquifer Characteristics of the Big River Area, Central Rhode Island By JANET RADWAY STONE and DAVID C. DICKERMAN Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4169 Prepared in cooperation with the RHODE ISLAND WATER RESOURCES BOARD Northborough, Massachusetts 2002 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: Subdistrict Chief U.S. Geological Survey Massachusetts-Rhode Island District Branch of Information Services U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286 Water Resources Division Denver, CO 80225-0286 10 Bearfoot Road Northborough, MA 01532 or visit our Web site at http://ma.water.usgs.gov CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgments......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • West Greenwich, Rhode Island: a Preliminary Report
    Historic and Architectural Resources of West Greenwich, Rhode Island: A Preliminary Report RIHPC LIBRARY -- STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS * PRELIMINARY SURVEY REPORT TOWN OF WEST GREENWICH * OCTOBER 1978 RHODE ISLAND HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMISSION 150 BENEFIT STREET, PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND 02903 I. un. I I PREFACE The Rhode Island Historical Preservation Commission, established by the General Assembly in 1968, is charged with the reponsibi1ity of safeguarding Rhode Island’s cultural heritage. In order to provide an overview of the physical record of this heritage, the Commission has initiated a "broadbrush" or preliminary planning survey of the rural and suburban towns of the state. The purpose of this initial inventory is to identify and record properties ofhistoric and architectural significance in each town. Presently, archeological resources are treated through a separate survey effort being conducted by the Commission. The preliminary surveys are designed to provide a catalogue of non-renewable cultural resources needed for a variety of planning purposes at the local, state and national levels. They identify sites, districts and structures eligible for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places Wand they become the basis for establishing preservation planning priorities basedon problems and po.tentials.discovéred as part of the survey process. * The preliminary surveys are accomplished by driving all public rights-of-way in a given town and noting on large-scale United States Geological Survey maps or other maps that may he more appropriate each building or ite of particulEr architectural, visual, cultural or historic significance. Each property is photographed and recorded on a standard data * *u .* 11.11: sheet which includes a physical description and notations con cerning history, use, condition and architectural ‘style or period.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Former Liberty Street School East Bay Community Development Corporation
    Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Former Liberty Street School 10 Liberty Street Warren, RI May 2009 317 Iron Horse Way Suite 204 Providence RI 02908 Table of Contents Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Former Liberty Street School East Bay Community Development Corporation 1 Introduction .................................................................................1 1.1 Objective......................................................................................................1 1.2 Scope of Services..........................................................................................1 2 Site Overview...............................................................................1 2.1 Site Information...........................................................................................1 2.1.1 Property Location, Size of Parcel and Site Plan...........................................1 2.1.2 Site Utilities........................................................................................................2 2.1.3 Adjoining Land Use..........................................................................................2 2.2 Physical Setting of Site ................................................................................3 2.2.1 Geologic and Physiographic Setting ..............................................................3 2.2.2 Groundwater .....................................................................................................3 2.2.3 Surface Water ....................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Final Pathogen TMDL for the Narragansett/Mt. Hope Bay Watershed July 2010 CN# 351.0 Report# 61 – TMDL - 2
    Final Pathogen TMDL for the Narragansett/Mt. Hope Bay Watershed July 2010 CN# 351.0 Report# 61 – TMDL - 2 Narragansett/Mt. Hope Bay Watershed Prepared as a cooperative effort by: Massachusetts DEP USEPA New England Region 1 1 Winter Street 1 Congress Street, Suite 1100 Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Boston, Massachusetts 02114 ENSR International 2 Technology Park Drive Westford, MA 01886 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY Limited copies of this report are available at no cost by written request to: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) Division of Watershed Management 627 Main Street Worcester, Massachusetts 01608 This report is also available from MassDEP’s home page on the World Wide Web. http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/tmdls.htm - narrag A complete list of reports published since 1963 is updated annually and printed in July. This list, titled “Publications of the Massachusetts Division of Watershed Management (DWM) – Watershed Planning Program, 1963-(current year)”, is also available by writing to the DWM in Worcester. DISCLAIMER References to trade names, commercial products, manufacturers, or distributors in this report constituted neither endorsement nor recommendations by the Division of Watershed Management for use. Much of this document was prepared using text and general guidance from the previously approved Charles River Basin, Cape Cod, Buzzards Bay, Neponset River Basin and the Palmer River Basin Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load documents. Acknowledgement This report was originally developed by ENSR through a partnership with Research Triangle Institute (RTI) contracting with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Agency under the National Watershed Protection Program.
    [Show full text]
  • RIRC Booklet Combined 2 27 2019
    THE RHODE ISLAND RIVERS COUNCIL www.ririvers.org One Capitol Hill Providence, Rhode Island 02908 [email protected] RHODE ISLAND RIVERS COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP Veronica Berounsky, Chair Alicia Eichinger, Vice Chair Robert Billington Rachel Calabro Walter Galloway Charles Horbert Elise Torello INSTITUTIONAL MEMBERS Paul Gonsalves for Michael DiBiase, Department of Administration Eugenia Marks for Kathleen Crawley, Water Resources Board Ernie Panciera for Janet Coit, Department of Environmental Management Peder Schaefer for Mayor James Diossa, League of Cities and Towns Mike Walker for Stefan Pryor, Commerce Corporation Jeff Willis for Grover Fugate, Coastal Resource Management Council ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Photographs in this publication provided by: Rhode Island Rivers Council Elise Torello, cover photograph, Upper Wood River Charles Biddle, "Children Planting, Middlebridge", pg. 1 Booklet compilation and design services provided by Liz Garofalo THANK YOU This booklet was made possible by a RI legislative grant sponsored by Representatives: Carol Hagan McEntee, (D-District 33, South Kingstown/Narragansett) Robert E. Craven, Sr., (D-District 32, North Kingstown) 2 RHODERHODE ISLANDISLAND WATERSHEDS WATERSHEDS MAP MAP 3 RHODE ISLAND RIVERS COUNCIL ABOUT US The Rhode Island Rivers Council (RIRC) is charged with coordinating state policies to protect rivers and watersheds. Our unique contribution is to strengthen local watershed councils as partners in rivers and watershed protection. Created by statute (RIGL 46-28) in 1991 as an associated function of the Rhode Island Water Resources Board, the RIRC mission is to preserve and improve the quality of Rhode Island's rivers and their watersheds and to work with public entities to develop plans to safely increase river use. Under the Rhode Island Rivers Council statute, rivers are defined as "a flowing body of water or estuary, including streams, creeks, brooks, ponds, coastal ponds, small lakes, and reservoirs." WHAT WE DO The RIRC plays a key role in the state's comprehensive environmental efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • RI 2008 Integrated Report
    STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS 2008 INTEGRATED WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT REPORT SECTION 305(b) STATE OF THE STATE’S WATERS REPORT And SECTION 303(d) LIST OF IMPAIRED WATERS FINAL APRIL 1, 2008 RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES www.dem.ri.gov STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS 2008 INTEGRATED WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT REPORT Section 305(b) State of the State’s Waters Report And Section 303(d) List of Impaired Waters FINAL April 1, 2008 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES 235 Promenade Street Providence, RI 02908 (401) 222-4700 www.dem.ri.gov Table of Contents List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................iii List of Figures............................................................................................................................................iii Executive Summary.................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 Integrated Report Overview.................................................................................................... 7 A. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 7 B. Background ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Plan for the Restoration of Anadromous Fishes to Rhode
    STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE RESTORATION OF ANADROMOUS FISHES TO RHODE ISLAND COASTAL STREAMS American Shad, Alosa sapidissima D. Raver, USFWS Prepared By: Dennis E. Erkan, Principal Marine Biologist Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Division of Fish and Wildlife Completion Report In Fulfillment of Federal Aid In Sportfish Restoration Project F-55-R December 2002 Special thanks to Luther Blount for initiating this project. Rhode Island Anadromous Restoration Plan CONTENTS Introduction........................................................................................................................Page 6 Methods..............................................................................................................................Page 7 I. Plan Objective...............................................................................................................Page 11 II. Expected Results or Benefits ......................................................................................Page 11 III. Strategic Plan.............................................................................................................Page 12 IV. References.................................................................................................................Page 15 V. Additional Sources of Information...............................................................................Page 16 APPENDICES Appendix A. Recommended Watershed Enhancements.....................................................Page 20 Appendix B. Description
    [Show full text]