Electric/Magnetic Dipole in an Electromagnetic Field: Force, Torque

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Electric/Magnetic Dipole in an Electromagnetic Field: Force, Torque Eur. Phys. J. Plus (2014) 129: 215 THE EUROPEAN DOI 10.1140/epjp/i2014-14215-y PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS Regular Article Electric/magnetic dipole in an electromagnetic field: force, torque and energy Alexander Kholmetskii1,2,a, Oleg Missevitch3, and T. Yarman3,4 1 Belarusian State University, Minsk, Belarus 2 Institute for Nuclear Problems, Belarusian State University, Minsk, Belarus 3 Okan University, Akfirat, Istanbul, Turkey 4 Savronik, Eskisehir, Turkey Received: 16 June 2014 Published online: 9 October 2014 – c Societ`a Italiana di Fisica / Springer-Verlag 2014 Abstract. In this paper we collect the relativistic expressions for the force, torque and energy of a small electric/magnetic dipole in an electromagnetic field, which we recently obtained (A.L. Kholmetskii et al., Eur. J. Phys. 33, L7 (2011), Prog. Electromagn. Res. B 45, 83 (2012), Can. J. Phys. 9, 576 (2013)) and consider a number of subtle effects, characterized the behavior of the dipole in an external field, which seem interesting from the practical viewpoint. 1 Introduction The problem of derivation of relativistic expressions for the force and torque experienced by a small electric/magnetic dipole in an external electromagnetic field was the subject of essential interest of researchers at the second half of the 20th century, and continues to attract attention up to date. The essential progress in this area was achieved with the derivation of the Bargmann-Michel-Telegdi (BMT) equation (1), which describes the time evolution of the particle’s spin with the inclusion of Thomas precession [2]. At the same time, the approach used in the derivation of the BMT equation (the introduction of the spin four-vector with the vanishing time component in the proper frame of the particle [1,3]) is convenient to determine the motion of the particle’s spin in its proper frame in terms of the external electromagnetic (EM) field measured in the laboratory. However, we remind that the transformation of the torque components is guided by the corresponding torque four-tensor [4], and one can check that its application does not allow to obtain an explicit analytical expression for the torque in the laboratory frame. At the same time, the derivation of the force and torque expressions, where all quantities are measured in the laboratory, has a principal importance in the consistent investigation of relativistic effects, related to the motion of an electric/magnetic dipole in an EM field. In addition, before the discovery of the hidden momentum of magnetic dipoles [5], its contribution to the force and torque was not taken into account; moreover, it continues to be ignored in some modern publications, including textbooks (e.g., [6]). One should mention that even in the past years, the problem of deriving the correct expression for the force and torque on a compact dipole faced a number of errors made by various authors (e.g., [7–11]). Nevertheless, the correct Lorentz-invariant expression for the force on a moving electric/magnetic dipole, seemingly for the first time, has been achieved in our recent contribution [12], which opened the way for the derivation of the relativistic equations for the description of a torque on a moving dipole [13], and its electromagnetic energy [14]. Now it seems useful from the practical viewpoint to collect these equations altogether in a single paper and to discuss some subtle points, related to their physical meaning, which were not specially commented in the mentioned papers [12–14]. The obtained equations for the force F , torque T and energy E of a small electrically neutral dipole with the proper electric p0 and magnetic m0 dipole moments, moving at velocity ν in the external electric E and magnetic B a e-mail: [email protected] Page 2 of 13 Eur. Phys. J. Plus (2014) 129: 215 fields, are as follows [12–14]: 1 d 1 d F = ∇(p · E)+∇(m · B)+ (p × B) − (m × E), (1) c dt c dt 1 1 T = p × E + m × B + ν × (p × B) − ν × (m × E), (2) c c 1 1 E = −(p · E) − (m · B) − (p × B) · ν + (m × E) · ν, (3) c c where (γ − 1) ν × m p = p − (p · ν)ν + 0 , (4) 0 γν2 0 c (γ − 1) p × ν m = m − (m · ν)ν + 0 (5) 0 γν2 0 c are, respectively, the electric and magnetic dipole moments of a moving dipole in the frame of observation [6,15,16], and γ =(1− ν2/c2)−1/2 is the Lorentz factor. Here we stress that eq. (3) determines the electromagnetic energy of the dipole only, and does not include the fractions of energy absorbed (extracted) in the power supply and in a source of external magnetic field [14]. We point out that the quantities entering into eqs. (1)-(3) are defined in the frame of observation (laboratory frame), and these equations also can be expressed either via the quantities measured in the rest frame of a dipole, or via some combination of these quantities (e.g., the proper electric and magnetic dipole moments, measured in the rest frame of a dipole, and electromagnetic fields measured in the laboratory. As we will see below, the latter combination is convenient for the analysis of the energy of the dipole). In sect. 2 we discuss the physical meaning of eqs. (1)–(3), focusing mainly our attention on the expressions for torque (2) and energy (3) for a moving dipole, insofar as the expression for the force experienced by a dipole has been already discussed in the related publications [9,11,12]. Finally, we conclude in sect. 3. 2 Expressions for the force, torque and energy of a moving dipole: Origin and implications 2.1 Force on a moving electric/magnetic dipole in an electromagnetic field In this subsection we address eq. (1) and remind that it originates from the Lorentz force law, applied to the electrically neutral compact bunch of charges [9] and also includes the force component due to time variation of the hidden momentum of the magnetic dipole (see, e.g. [3,5,17–19]). More specifically, the sum of the terms contaning p (i.e. the first and third terms) describes the Coulomb interaction of the charges of the electric dipole with the electric field, and the interaction of the convective currents of the dipole with the magnetic field. The sum of the terms contaning m (i.e. the second and fourth terms) is responsible for the interaction of the proper (closed) current of the magnetic dipole with the magnetic field, and also includes the hidden-momentum contribution. A real situation might be more complicated, because the moving electric dipole develops the magnetic dipole moment, and the moving magnetic dipole possesses an electric dipole moment, see eqs. (4), (5). However, we skip the detailed analysis of the various terms in eq. (1), which can be found in the above-mentioned publications [9,11, 12], and would like to give answer to the question, which we ask time by time: why the Lorentz force law alone fails to describe the hidden-momentum contribution to the resultant force on a magnetic dipole, and the latter should be exogeneously added to the motional equation for a bunch of charges in an electromagnetic field? The general answer to this question is straightforward: the Lorentz force law is relevant only for point-like charges, whereas an electric/magnetic dipole always represents some finite-size distribution of the charges. If so, an external electromagnetic field should induce some changes in its inner volume (polarization, magnetization, the appearance of mechanical stresses, etc.). The mentioned changes can be classified as some “secondary” effects emerging in the bulk of the dipole due to the external electromagnetic field. It was pointed out for the first time in ref. [5] that such secondary effects can be attributed to the appearance of the momentum component of the magnetic dipole, even if the dipole, as the whole, is at rest in the frame of observation; that is why this component was named as the “hidden” momentum. Moreover, it was further proven in ref. [17] that for a magnetic dipole, resting in an electric field, being created by a static-charge distribution, the hidden momentum of the dipole is exactly equal with the reverse sign to the interactional electromagnetic momentum of this configuration, and the time variation of the hidden momentum (which induces the appearance of force on the dipole) is exactly equal with the reverse sign to time variation of the field momentum. Therefore, the hidden momentum plays an important role in the energy-momentum balance for isolated systems, which include charges and magnetic dipoles. Eur. Phys. J. Plus (2014) 129: 215 Page 3 of 13 Fhidden Fp q m . v -Fp Fin y x Fig. 1. Interaction of a resting charge q with a moving magnetic dipole m. The dipole is moving without friction along the x-axis inside a thin insulating tube (not shown in the figure), and the charge is rigidly attached to the tube. The tube has a single degree of freedom to move along/opposite to the y-axis. To demonstrate the validity of this statement, let us consider the following problem (see fig. 1). Let a small magnetic dipole with the proper magnetic dipole moment m{0, 0,m} move inside a thin isolated tube oriented along the x-axis. Let a point-like charge q be rigidly fixed inside the same tube at the origin of the coordinates. We further asume that at the initial time moment t = 0 the magnetic dipole has the x-coordinate X1, and analyze the implementation of the energy-momentum conservation law, considering another time moment t = T , when the x-coordinate of the dipole becomes equal to X2.
Recommended publications
  • Basic Magnetic Measurement Methods
    Basic magnetic measurement methods Magnetic measurements in nanoelectronics 1. Vibrating sample magnetometry and related methods 2. Magnetooptical methods 3. Other methods Introduction Magnetization is a quantity of interest in many measurements involving spintronic materials ● Biot-Savart law (1820) (Jean-Baptiste Biot (1774-1862), Félix Savart (1791-1841)) Magnetic field (the proper name is magnetic flux density [1]*) of a current carrying piece of conductor is given by: μ 0 I dl̂ ×⃗r − − ⃗ 7 1 - vacuum permeability d B= μ 0=4 π10 Hm 4 π ∣⃗r∣3 ● The unit of the magnetic flux density, Tesla (1 T=1 Wb/m2), as a derive unit of Si must be based on some measurement (force, magnetic resonance) *the alternative name is magnetic induction Introduction Magnetization is a quantity of interest in many measurements involving spintronic materials ● Biot-Savart law (1820) (Jean-Baptiste Biot (1774-1862), Félix Savart (1791-1841)) Magnetic field (the proper name is magnetic flux density [1]*) of a current carrying piece of conductor is given by: μ 0 I dl̂ ×⃗r − − ⃗ 7 1 - vacuum permeability d B= μ 0=4 π10 Hm 4 π ∣⃗r∣3 ● The Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (German national metrology institute) maintains a unit Tesla in form of coils with coil constant k (ratio of the magnetic flux density to the coil current) determined based on NMR measurements graphics from: http://www.ptb.de/cms/fileadmin/internet/fachabteilungen/abteilung_2/2.5_halbleiterphysik_und_magnetismus/2.51/realization.pdf *the alternative name is magnetic induction Introduction It
    [Show full text]
  • The Magnetic Moment of a Bar Magnet and the Horizontal Component of the Earth’S Magnetic Field
    260 16-1 EXPERIMENT 16 THE MAGNETIC MOMENT OF A BAR MAGNET AND THE HORIZONTAL COMPONENT OF THE EARTH’S MAGNETIC FIELD I. THEORY The purpose of this experiment is to measure the magnetic moment μ of a bar magnet and the horizontal component BE of the earth's magnetic field. Since there are two unknown quantities, μ and BE, we need two independent equations containing the two unknowns. We will carry out two separate procedures: The first procedure will yield the ratio of the two unknowns; the second will yield the product. We will then solve the two equations simultaneously. The pole strength of a bar magnet may be determined by measuring the force F exerted on one pole of the magnet by an external magnetic field B0. The pole strength is then defined by p = F/B0 Note the similarity between this equation and q = F/E for electric charges. In Experiment 3 we learned that the magnitude of the magnetic field, B, due to a single magnetic pole varies as the inverse square of the distance from the pole. k′ p B = r 2 in which k' is defined to be 10-7 N/A2. Consider a bar magnet with poles a distance 2x apart. Consider also a point P, located a distance r from the center of the magnet, along a straight line which passes from the center of the magnet through the North pole. Assume that r is much larger than x. The resultant magnetic field Bm at P due to the magnet is the vector sum of a field BN directed away from the North pole, and a field BS directed toward the South pole.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Electric Dipole Moment from Beyond the Standard Model on the Lattice
    Introduction Quark EDM Dirac Equation Operator Mixing Lattice Results Conclusions Neutron Electric Dipole Moment from Beyond the Standard Model on the lattice Tanmoy Bhattacharya Los Alamos National Laboratory 2019 Lattice Workshop for US-Japan Intensity Frontier Incubation Mar 27, 2019 Tanmoy Bhattacharya nEDM from BSM on the lattice Introduction Standard Model CP Violation Quark EDM Experimental situation Dirac Equation Effective Field Theory Operator Mixing BSM Operators Lattice Results Impact on BSM physics Conclusions Form Factors Introduction Standard Model CP Violation Two sources of CP violation in the Standard Model. Complex phase in CKM quark mixing matrix. Too small to explain baryon asymmetry Gives a tiny (∼ 10−32 e-cm) contribution to nEDM CP-violating mass term and effective ΘGG˜ interaction related to QCD instantons Effects suppressed at high energies −10 nEDM limits constrain Θ . 10 Contributions from beyond the standard model Needed to explain baryogenesis May have large contribution to EDM Tanmoy Bhattacharya nEDM from BSM on the lattice Introduction Standard Model CP Violation Quark EDM Experimental situation Dirac Equation Effective Field Theory Operator Mixing BSM Operators Lattice Results Impact on BSM physics Conclusions Form Factors Introduction 4 Experimental situation 44 Experimental landscape ExperimentalExperimental landscape landscape nEDM upper limits (90% C.L.) 4 nEDMnEDM upper upper limits limits (90% (90% C.L.) C.L.) 10−19 19 19 Beam System Current SM 1010− −20 −20−20 BeamBraggBeam scattering SystemSystem
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Polarizability of a Short Right Circular Conducting Cylinder 1
    Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards-B. Mathematics and Mathematical Physics Vol. 64B, No.4, October- December 1960 Magnetic Polarizability of a Short Right Circular Conducting Cylinder 1 T. T. Taylor 2 (August 1, 1960) The magnetic polarizability tensor of a short righ t circular conducting cylinder is calcu­ lated in the principal axes system wit h a un iform quasi-static but nonpenetrating a pplied fi eld. On e of the two distinct tensor components is derived from res ults alread y obtained in co nnection wi th the electric polarizabili ty of short conducting cylinders. The other is calcu­ lated to an accuracy of four to five significan t fi gures for cylinders with radius to half-length ratios of }~, }~, 1, 2, a nd 4. These results, when combin ed with t he corresponding results for the electric polari zability, are a pplicable to t he proble m of calculating scattering from cylin­ cl ers and to the des ign of artifi c;al dispersive media. 1. Introduction This ar ticle considers the problem of finding the mftgnetie polariz ability tensor {3ij of a short, that is, noninfinite in length, righ t circular conducting cylinder under the assumption of negli gible field penetration. The latter condition can be realized easily with avail able con­ ductin g materials and fi elds which, although time varying, have wavelengths long compared with cylinder dimensions and can therefore be regftrded as quasi-static. T he approach of the present ar ticle is parallel to that employed earlier [1] 3 by the author fo r fin ding the electric polarizability of shor t co nductin g cylinders.
    [Show full text]
  • PH585: Magnetic Dipoles and So Forth
    PH585: Magnetic dipoles and so forth 1 Magnetic Moments Magnetic moments ~µ are analogous to dipole moments ~p in electrostatics. There are two sorts of magnetic dipoles we will consider: a dipole consisting of two magnetic charges p separated by a distance d (a true dipole), and a current loop of area A (an approximate dipole). N p d -p I S Figure 1: (left) A magnetic dipole, consisting of two magnetic charges p separated by a distance d. The dipole moment is |~µ| = pd. (right) An approximate magnetic dipole, consisting of a loop with current I and area A. The dipole moment is |~µ| = IA. In the case of two separated magnetic charges, the dipole moment is trivially calculated by comparison with an electric dipole – substitute ~µ for ~p and p for q.i In the case of the current loop, a bit more work is required to find the moment. We will come to this shortly, for now we just quote the result ~µ=IA nˆ, where nˆ is a unit vector normal to the surface of the loop. 2 An Electrostatics Refresher In order to appreciate the magnetic dipole, we should remind ourselves first how one arrives at the field for an electric dipole. Recall Maxwell’s first equation (in the absence of polarization density): ρ ∇~ · E~ = (1) r0 If we assume that the fields are static, we can also write: ∂B~ ∇~ × E~ = − (2) ∂t This means, as you discovered in your last homework, that E~ can be written as the gradient of a scalar function ϕ, the electric potential: E~ = −∇~ ϕ (3) This lets us rewrite Eq.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 14: Dielectric Properties of Insulators
    Physics 927 E.Y.Tsymbal Section 14: Dielectric properties of insulators The central quantity in the physics of dielectrics is the polarization of the material P. The polarization P is defined as the dipole moment p per unit volume. The dipole moment of a system of charges is given by = p qiri (1) i where ri is the position vector of charge qi. The value of the sum is independent of the choice of the origin of system, provided that the system in neutral. The simplest case of an electric dipole is a system consisting of a positive and negative charge, so that the dipole moment is equal to qa, where a is a vector connecting the two charges (from negative to positive). The electric field produces by the dipole moment at distances much larger than a is given by (in CGS units) 3(p⋅r)r − r 2p E(r) = (2) r5 According to electrostatics the electric field E is related to a scalar potential as follows E = −∇ϕ , (3) which gives the potential p ⋅r ϕ(r) = (4) r3 When solving electrostatics problem in many cases it is more convenient to work with the potential rather than the field. A dielectric acquires a polarization due to an applied electric field. This polarization is the consequence of redistribution of charges inside the dielectric. From the macroscopic point of view the dielectric can be considered as a material with no net charges in the interior of the material and induced negative and positive charges on the left and right surfaces of the dielectric.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Introduce the Magnetic Dipole Moment
    IOP PUBLISHING EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS Eur. J. Phys. 33 (2012) 1313–1320 doi:10.1088/0143-0807/33/5/1313 How to introduce the magnetic dipole moment M Bezerra, W J M Kort-Kamp, M V Cougo-Pinto and C Farina Instituto de F´ısica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68528, CEP 21941-972, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil E-mail: [email protected] Received 17 May 2012, in final form 26 June 2012 Published 19 July 2012 Online at stacks.iop.org/EJP/33/1313 Abstract We show how the concept of the magnetic dipole moment can be introduced in the same way as the concept of the electric dipole moment in introductory courses on electromagnetism. Considering a localized steady current distribution, we make a Taylor expansion directly in the Biot–Savart law to obtain, explicitly, the dominant contribution of the magnetic field at distant points, identifying the magnetic dipole moment of the distribution. We also present a simple but general demonstration of the torque exerted by a uniform magnetic field on a current loop of general form, not necessarily planar. For pedagogical reasons we start by reviewing briefly the concept of the electric dipole moment. 1. Introduction The general concepts of electric and magnetic dipole moments are commonly found in our daily life. For instance, it is not rare to refer to polar molecules as those possessing a permanent electric dipole moment. Concerning magnetic dipole moments, it is difficult to find someone who has never heard about magnetic resonance imaging (or has never had such an examination).
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Fields
    Welcome Back to Physics 1308 Magnetic Fields Sir Joseph John Thomson 18 December 1856 – 30 August 1940 Physics 1308: General Physics II - Professor Jodi Cooley Announcements • Assignments for Tuesday, October 30th: - Reading: Chapter 29.1 - 29.3 - Watch Videos: - https://youtu.be/5Dyfr9QQOkE — Lecture 17 - The Biot-Savart Law - https://youtu.be/0hDdcXrrn94 — Lecture 17 - The Solenoid • Homework 9 Assigned - due before class on Tuesday, October 30th. Physics 1308: General Physics II - Professor Jodi Cooley Physics 1308: General Physics II - Professor Jodi Cooley Review Question 1 Consider the two rectangular areas shown with a point P located at the midpoint between the two areas. The rectangular area on the left contains a bar magnet with the south pole near point P. The rectangle on the right is initially empty. How will the magnetic field at P change, if at all, when a second bar magnet is placed on the right rectangle with its north pole near point P? A) The direction of the magnetic field will not change, but its magnitude will decrease. B) The direction of the magnetic field will not change, but its magnitude will increase. C) The magnetic field at P will be zero tesla. D) The direction of the magnetic field will change and its magnitude will increase. E) The direction of the magnetic field will change and its magnitude will decrease. Physics 1308: General Physics II - Professor Jodi Cooley Review Question 2 An electron traveling due east in a region that contains only a magnetic field experiences a vertically downward force, toward the surface of the earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Equivalence of Current–Carrying Coils and Magnets; Magnetic Dipoles; - Law of Attraction and Repulsion, Definition of the Ampere
    GEOPHYSICS (08/430/0012) THE EARTH'S MAGNETIC FIELD OUTLINE Magnetism Magnetic forces: - equivalence of current–carrying coils and magnets; magnetic dipoles; - law of attraction and repulsion, definition of the ampere. Magnetic fields: - magnetic fields from electrical currents and magnets; magnetic induction B and lines of magnetic induction. The geomagnetic field The magnetic elements: (N, E, V) vector components; declination (azimuth) and inclination (dip). The external field: diurnal variations, ionospheric currents, magnetic storms, sunspot activity. The internal field: the dipole and non–dipole fields, secular variations, the geocentric axial dipole hypothesis, geomagnetic reversals, seabed magnetic anomalies, The dynamo model Reasons against an origin in the crust or mantle and reasons suggesting an origin in the fluid outer core. Magnetohydrodynamic dynamo models: motion and eddy currents in the fluid core, mechanical analogues. Background reading: Fowler §3.1 & 7.9.2, Lowrie §5.2 & 5.4 GEOPHYSICS (08/430/0012) MAGNETIC FORCES Magnetic forces are forces associated with the motion of electric charges, either as electric currents in conductors or, in the case of magnetic materials, as the orbital and spin motions of electrons in atoms. Although the concept of a magnetic pole is sometimes useful, it is diácult to relate precisely to observation; for example, all attempts to find a magnetic monopole have failed, and the model of permanent magnets as magnetic dipoles with north and south poles is not particularly accurate. Consequently moving charges are normally regarded as fundamental in magnetism. Basic observations 1. Permanent magnets A magnet attracts iron and steel, the attraction being most marked close to its ends.
    [Show full text]
  • Gauss' Theorem (See History for Rea- Son)
    Gauss’ Law Contents 1 Gauss’s law 1 1.1 Qualitative description ......................................... 1 1.2 Equation involving E field ....................................... 1 1.2.1 Integral form ......................................... 1 1.2.2 Differential form ....................................... 2 1.2.3 Equivalence of integral and differential forms ........................ 2 1.3 Equation involving D field ....................................... 2 1.3.1 Free, bound, and total charge ................................. 2 1.3.2 Integral form ......................................... 2 1.3.3 Differential form ....................................... 2 1.4 Equivalence of total and free charge statements ............................ 2 1.5 Equation for linear materials ...................................... 2 1.6 Relation to Coulomb’s law ....................................... 3 1.6.1 Deriving Gauss’s law from Coulomb’s law .......................... 3 1.6.2 Deriving Coulomb’s law from Gauss’s law .......................... 3 1.7 See also ................................................ 3 1.8 Notes ................................................. 3 1.9 References ............................................... 3 1.10 External links ............................................. 3 2 Electric flux 4 2.1 See also ................................................ 4 2.2 References ............................................... 4 2.3 External links ............................................. 4 3 Ampère’s circuital law 5 3.1 Ampère’s original
    [Show full text]
  • Assembling a Magnetometer for Measuring the Magnetic Properties of Iron Oxide Microparticles in the Classroom Laboratory Jefferson F
    APPARATUS AND DEMONSTRATION NOTES The downloaded PDF for any Note in this section contains all the Notes in this section. John Essick, Editor Department of Physics, Reed College, Portland, OR 97202 This department welcomes brief communications reporting new demonstrations, laboratory equip- ment, techniques, or materials of interest to teachers of physics. Notes on new applications of older apparatus, measurements supplementing data supplied by manufacturers, information which, while not new, is not generally known, procurement information, and news about apparatus under development may be suitable for publication in this section. Neither the American Journal of Physics nor the Editors assume responsibility for the correctness of the information presented. Manuscripts should be submitted using the web-based system that can be accessed via the American Journal of Physics home page, http://web.mit.edu/rhprice/www, and will be forwarded to the ADN edi- tor for consideration. Assembling a magnetometer for measuring the magnetic properties of iron oxide microparticles in the classroom laboratory Jefferson F. D. F. Araujo, a) Joao~ M. B. Pereira, and Antonio^ C. Bruno Department of Physics, Pontifıcia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 22451-900, Brazil (Received 19 July 2018; accepted 9 April 2019) A compact magnetometer, simple enough to be assembled and used by physics instructional laboratory students, is presented. The assembled magnetometer can measure the magnetic response of materials due to an applied field generated by permanent magnets. Along with the permanent magnets, the magnetometer consists of two Hall effect-based sensors, a wall-adapter dc power supply to bias the sensors, a handheld digital voltmeter, and a plastic ruler.
    [Show full text]
  • Class 35: Magnetic Moments and Intrinsic Spin
    Class 35: Magnetic moments and intrinsic spin A small current loop produces a dipole magnetic field. The dipole moment, m, of the current loop is a vector with direction perpendicular to the plane of the loop and magnitude equal to the product of the area of the loop, A, and the current, I, i.e. m = AI . A magnetic dipole placed in a magnetic field, B, τ experiences a torque =m × B , which tends to align an initially stationary N dipole with the field, as shown in the figure on the right, where the dipole is represented as a bar magnetic with North and South poles. The work done by the torque in turning through a small angle dθ (> 0) is θ dW==−τθ dmBsin θθ d = mB d ( cos θ ) . (35.1) S Because the work done is equal to the change in kinetic energy, by applying conservation of mechanical energy, we see that the potential energy of a dipole in a magnetic field is V =−mBcosθ =−⋅ mB , (35.2) where the zero point is taken to be when the direction of the dipole is orthogonal to the magnetic field. The minimum potential occurs when the dipole is aligned with the magnetic field. An electron of mass me moving in a circle of radius r with speed v is equivalent to current loop where the current is the electron charge divided by the period of the motion. The magnetic moment has magnitude π r2 e1 1 e m = =rve = L , (35.3) 2π r v 2 2 m e where L is the magnitude of the angular momentum.
    [Show full text]