13 ELEK APP6.01 Arch DESKBASED ASSESS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

13 ELEK APP6.01 Arch DESKBASED ASSESS A DESK-BASED ASSESSMENT ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORIC FEATURES (December 2012) REMPSTONE, EAST LEAKE QUARRY, NOTTINGHAMSHIRE For CEMEX UK OPERATIONS LTD Cemex House Evreux Way Rugby Warwickshire CV21 2DT Prepared by THE GUILDHOUSE CONSULTANCY The Old Guildhouse, 19 Ladygate, Beverley, East Yorkshire HU17 8BH (Tel & Fax 01482 861003) CONTENTS 1 SCOPE OF THE ASSESSMENT 1 1.1 The Commission 1.2 The Reason 1.3 The Purpose 1.4 The Methodology 1.5 The Study Area 1.6 The Sources 2 POLICY FRAMEWORK 5 2.1 National Planning Policy Framework (27th March 2012) 2.2 Nottinghamshire Minerals Local Plan (adopted 5th December 2005) 2.3 New Minerals Local Plan Consultation 2.4 The Rushcliffe Borough Council Non-Statutory Replacement Local Plan (Adopted 14th December 2006) 2.5 Rushcliffe Publication Core Strategy Development Plan Document (March 2012) 2.6 Summary of Archaeological Policies 3 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREA (PDA) 10 3.1 Location 3.2 Proposal Details 3.3 Walkover Survey 3.4 Boundaries 3.5 Former and Current Landuse 3.6 Internal Features 4 PHYSICAL SETTING 14 4.1 Topography 4.2 Solid and Drift Geology 4.3 Soils 4.4 Drainage and Water Levels 5 BASELINE CONDITIONS ~ ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS 18 5.1 Scheduled Monuments 5.2 Other Formally Designated Archaeological Sites and Historic Features 5.3 Known Archaeology Within the Proposed Development Area 5.4 Known Archaeology Adjacent to the Proposed Development 5.5 Known Archaeology in the Remainder of the Study Area 6 BASELINE CONDITIONS ~ NON-ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS 46 6.1 Listed Buildings Within the Proposed Development Area 6.2 Listed Buildings Adjacent to the Proposed Development Area 6.3 Listed Buildings in the Remainder of the Study Area 6.4 Public Rights of Way Within the Proposed Development Area 6.5 Public Rights of Way Adjacent to the Proposed Development Area 6.6 Public Rights of Way in the Remainder of the Study Area 6.7 Registered Parks, Gardens and Battlefields 7 OTHER SOURCES RELATING TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AREA 47 7.1 Cartographic Sources 7.2 Documentary and Printed Sources 7.3 Aerial Photographic Sources 8 ASSESSMENT OF HERITAGE ASSETS 50 8.1 Known Archaeology and Historic Features Within the PDA 8.2 Known Archaeology and Historic Features Adjacent to the PDA 9 POTENTIAL FOR ARCHAEOLOGY 62 9.1 Topography and Soils 9.2 Prehistoric Periods 9.3 Roman Period 9.4 Early Medieval (Anglo-Saxon) Period 9.5 Later Medieval (AD 1066 - c.1450) Period 9.6 Post-Medieval & Recent Periods 9.7 Undated Features 9.8 Non-Archaeological Features 9.9 Environmental & Organic Remains 9.10 Factors Affecting Survival 9.11 Quality of Data 10 CONCLUSION 70 11 IMPACT AND MITIGATION 74 11.1 Assessment of Impact 11.2 Proposed Mitigation Strategy ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PRINTED, DOCUMENTARY AND CARTOGRAPHIC SOURCES LIST OF FIGURES AND APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 ~ NHER HISTORIC BUILDINGS RECORD LISTING APPENDIX 2 ~ PROVISIONAL CHRONOLOGY OF THE CHURCH OF ST PETER`S IN THE RUSHES NB : This Study has been prepared for Cemex UK Operations Ltd and in accordance with normal policy it is intended solely for the above specified use. It is for use by the named Client and any professional advisor. No responsibility for the whole or any part of the contents is accepted in relation to any third party. © Guildhouse Consultancy REMPSTONE, EAST LEAKE QUARRY, NOTTINGHAMSHIRE DESK-BASED ASSESSMENT - ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC FEATURES 1 SCOPE OF THE ASSESSMENT (Figures 1 - 3) 1.1 The Commission (Figs 1 & 2) 1.1.1 The Guildhouse Consultancy has been commissioned by Kirsten Hannaford-Hill, Development Planner in the Estates Department, Cemex UK Operations Limited, to produce a Desk-based Archaeological Assessment of a large parcel of land lying c. 11k south of West Bridgeford and c. 6k to the north east of Loughborough (Fig 1). Located to the NW of the small settlement of Rempstone the area under consideration consists of a single field known as `The Rempstone Estate Land`. This lies immediately to the east of the previous and current workings at East Leake Quarry. The land covers 47.26ha (116.73 acres) and is centered on NGR SK 572 247 ; it is referred to throughout this report as the `Proposed Development Area` (`PDA`) or the `Site`. 1.1.2 Both previous and current workings (Fig 2) have been the subject of ongoing archaeological investigations since 1995. Although siteworks on the former have been concluded, those on the currently Consented Area (known as `Jenk`s Land) are ongoing (Application Ref. 8/07/02187/CMA) ; these cover an Application Area of c. 8.4h (nett extraction area of 5.8h). A further area, known as `Burton`s Land`, which abuts the SE of the previous workings and the SW of Jenk`s Land is under Application. 1.1.3 Since 1995 extensive fieldwork on the original workings at East Leake Quarry has been reported on by two archaeological contractors (Lyndsey Archaeological Services – LAS 2001, 2004, 2004a, 2004b, 2005a & b, 2006, 2007, 2008a & 2008b and Trent & Peak Archaeological Trust – TPAT 1995 & 2006). Desk-based archaeological assessments to inform Planning Applications have also been produced for Jenk`s Land (CA 2007a) and Burton`s Land (TGC 2010). Further to evaluation by limited trial trenching (CA 2007b) work on the former Consented area is being undertaken to a Mineral Planning Authority (MPA) approved Written Scheme of Investigation (WSI) (TGC 2009) and a Contractor Project Design (T&P 2010). Ground works consists of three Extraction Phases (1a-1c) which have now been stripped and cleared of archaeology with the exception of a small strip lying between Extraction Phases 1a and 1c. The final minor site works are expected in 2013 ; these will enable formal post-excavation works. Brief interims on the results of Phase 1a (T&P 2011), Phase 1b (T&P 2012a) and Phase 1c (T&P 2012b) have been included in this Assessment. 1.1.4 With regard to the PDA, previous researches and archaeological assessment were carried out in 2006 to inform on the archaeological potential and context of the Site (TGC 2006). These works included a detailed Nottinghamshire Sites and Monuments Record search (NSMR - now the Nottinghamshire Historic Environment Record), a `walkover` survey, examination of the available Soils, Drift Geology/Borehole information and a review of the readily available documentation on the church site of St Peter`s in the Rushes which lies immediately adjacent to the NW corner of the PDA. THE GUILDHOUSE CONSULTANCY 1 REMPSTONE, EAST LEAKE QUARRY, NOTTINGHAMSHIRE DESK-BASED ASSESSMENT - ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC FEATURES 1.2 The Reason 1.2.1 Cemex UK Operations Ltd. propose making an application for mineral extraction (sand and gravel) and associated works and wish to address in detail the issue of archaeology as required by the Planning process. In line with policies at Borough, County and National level Cemex follows `best practice` in giving due regard to any necessary archaeological provision. 1.3 The Purpose 1.3.1 To enable the Minerals Planning Authority (MPA) to make informed judgements and considered decisions on the archaeological impact of any Application the following have been examined : i) The Physical and Topographical Context ii) Known Sites and Historic Features and iii) The Potential for Sites 1.4 The Methodology 1.4.1 This has been based on : - i) The collection of readily available archaeological data and relevant information from cartographic, documentary, printed and aerial photographic sources ii) Assessment of identified heritage assets and the general potential for sites iii) Assessment of the impact of the PDA and a Proposed Mitigation Strategy 1.4.2 All researches, data collection etc. together with the writing of this report were carried out by Adrian Havercroft of The Guildhouse Consultancy acting as Consultant to Cemex UK Operations Limited. 1.5 The Study Area (Figs 1-3) 1.5.1 As part of the 2006 Archaeological Assessment an initial c. 2k search radius (centered on SK (4)5720/(3)2480) yielded over 140 entries in the then Nottinghamshire Sites and Monuments Record (NSMR). Further to discussion with the NSMR staff at that time it was agreed that a smaller c. 1.5k radius would be adequate to `context` the PDA and enable that Assessment. As the footprint of the present Site lies entirely within that of the previous Assessment the original Study Area has been retained. 1.5.2 The main data collection and information assessment was originally undertaken in June/July 2006. In 2010 these works were updated, extended and re-focussed to enable the Burton`s Land Assessment and this same approach has been undertaken with regard to the present PDA with new a `walkover` survey, Nottinghamshire Historic Environmental Record and other searches in 2012 (See 1.6 below). 1.5.3 The Study Area lies within parts of the parishes of Costock, East Leake, Rempstone and THE GUILDHOUSE CONSULTANCY 2 REMPSTONE, EAST LEAKE QUARRY, NOTTINGHAMSHIRE DESK-BASED ASSESSMENT - ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC FEATURES Stanford on Soar. The boundaries of the first three of these meet c. 300m beyond the NW corner of the PDA and a section of the boundary between Rempstone and Costock lies, for a short distance, on (or very close to), the Sheepwash Brook where it also marks part of the PDA northern boundary (Fig 3). 1.5.4 The PDA lies entirely within the north western sector of the parish of Rempstone. The common parish boundary with East Leake lies, at its closest point, c. 200m to the west. This has been investigated on two occasions in 1992 (TPAT 1992) & 2011 (T&P 2011). Results of the former (See 5.5.1 M18297) confirmed a low bank/lynchet of variable height/offset which was thought likely to be the result of ploughing.
Recommended publications
  • MAILING CONTENTS PAGE.Pub
    Clergy Mailing - July 2017 Contents 1. Nifty Notes 2. Ministry Vacancies 3. Open Churches Weekends 4. Summer Holiday Fun 5. Education Sunday Niftynotes news & information from the Diocese www.southwell.anglican.org JULY 2017 Compiled by Nicola Mellors email: [email protected] Bishop of Southwell & Nottingham to ordain twenty clergy this month record number of new MICHAEL ALLEN: Michael is clergy will be ordained married to Beth and they have Aby the Bishop of two children, Florence (2 ½) and Southwell & Nottingham on 1st Henry (8 months). Michael will and 2nd July in the Minster. serve his title with The Revd Tim Twenty will be ordained as Parker in the East Leake, West deacons and priests to serve in Leake, Stanford-on-Soar, parishes across the diocese, from Rempstone and Costock East Leake in the south to Bawtry Benefice. in the north. It is the largest number of stipendiary clergy NAEEM BAHADUR: Naeem is being ordained in the diocese for married to Rubina and they have over twenty years, including five Michele Hampson two children, Cyrus (5) and of those being ordained deacon Jeremiah (3). Naeem trained for who are under 30. They will be church. This is such a great ministry at the Queen’s serving in churches that encouragement as we seek to Foundation, Birmingham. He will incorporate every part of the grow the church in every Continued on page 3 diocese: city centre, outer urban, community, bringing the hope of market towns, and rural Jesus Christ to people of all communities. ages.” In this month’s issue: Bishop Paul says: “I am thrilled The Deacon candidates are: 2 News in brief to be ordaining so many deacons and priests to serve in churches PETER SHAW: Peter is married 4 Events & information across the Diocese of Southwell to Steph.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Parish Council Meeting – 20 May 2020
    Stanford on Soar Parish Council Minutes of the Meeting of the Parish Council held virtually on 20 May 2020 at 19:00 Page 20/16 Present Frances McKim (Chairman) Rushcliffe Borough Councillor (RBC) Lesley Way Sarah Lambert Clerk to the Parish Council Rebecca Hague Craig Leggett 1. Apologies for absence Apologies received from Prue Adkin, Wendy Butler, Paul Waterfall, Rachael Eldessouky, Rushcliffe Borough Councillors Carys Thomas and Kevin Shaw and Nottinghamshire County Councillor Andy Brown. 2. Amendments to Standing Orders Proposed amendments to Standing Orders to allow for meetings to be held and decisions made virtually had been circulated to councillors prior to the meeting. Councillors agreed unanimously to adopt these amendments. 3. Declarations of interests None. 4. Open Session No residents present. 5. Minutes of the last meeting held on 26 February 2020 The minutes were accepted by Councillors as a true and accurate account of the meeting and signed by the Chair. 6. Borough and County Council Matters Cllr Way gave an update on Rushcliffe Borough Council matters, the main focus over the last couple of months had been the coronavirus response, financial support is available for businesses and also for individuals to help with council tax. A motion put to Rushcliffe Borough Council by Cllr Shaw regarding the reduction of noise from fireworks had received full support. This financial year’s community support fund is now available. The leader of Rushcliffe Borough Council has launched a loneliness campaign which will be built on going forward. 7. Planning • 20/00746/FUL – Miniature Golf Course at Stanford Hall - Erection of timber club house – PC No objection, pending decision from RBC 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Map Referred to in the Rushcliffe (Electoral Changes) Order 2013 Sheet 1 of 1
    SHEET 1, MAP 1 Rushcliffe_Sheet1, Map 1:iteration 1_IT Map referred to in the Rushcliffe (Electoral Changes) Order 2013 Sheet 1 of 1 FLINTHAM CP This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of KNEETON CP the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2013. SIBTHORPE CP Boundary alignments and names shown on the mapping background SHELTON CP may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest Boundary information applied as part of this review. SCREVETON CP P EAST BRIDGFORD CP C H T R O FLAWBOROUGH CP W S K W A H EAST BRIDGFORD CAR COLSTON CP THOROTON CP CRANMER SHELFORD AND NEWTON CP SCARRINGTON CP THOROTON ORSTON CP ASLOCKTON CP SAXONDALE CP BINGHAM EAST BINGHAM CP RADCLIFFE ON TRENT CP BINGHAM A RADCLIFFE ON TRENT WEST WHATTON-IN-THE-VALE CP D B ELTON-ON-THE-HILL LADY CP C HOLME PIERREPONT CP T BAY B R GAMSTON NORTH R E I D N CROPWELL BUTLER CP G T E GAMSTON CP N O S T E M ABBEY P WIVERTON HALL R U M C S CP GAMSTON CROPWELL TITHBY GRANBY CP O A T L E CP C L R SOUTH E S R E T COTGRAVE T E U CROPWELL BISHOP CP L TOLLERTON CP COTGRAVE CP EDWALTON LANGAR CUM BARNSTONE CP C L TOLLERTON IP F S T O N C P PLUMTREE CP NORMANTON KEY TO PARISH WARDS RUDDINGTON ON THE WOLDS OWTHORPE CP COLSTON BARTON IN FABIS CP CP BASSETT RUDDINGTON CP BINGHAM CP CP A BINGHAM EAST B BINGHAM WEST HOLME PIERREPONT CP BRADMORE
    [Show full text]
  • 863 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    863 bus time schedule & line map 863 Keyworth - East Leake - Ruddington View In Website Mode The 863 bus line (Keyworth - East Leake - Ruddington) has 3 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) East Leake: 2:46 PM (2) Keyworth: 9:40 AM - 1:40 PM (3) Ruddington: 10:46 AM - 12:46 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 863 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 863 bus arriving. Direction: East Leake 863 bus Time Schedule 25 stops East Leake Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 2:46 PM The Square, Keyworth The Square, Keyworth Civil Parish Tuesday 2:46 PM Health Centre, Keyworth Wednesday 2:46 PM Woodleigh, Keyworth Civil Parish Thursday 2:46 PM West Close, Keyworth Friday 2:46 PM Manor Road, Keyworth Civil Parish Saturday 2:46 PM Croft Road, Keyworth Manor Road, Keyworth Civil Parish Spinney Road, Keyworth 863 bus Info Nottingham Road, Keyworth Direction: East Leake 100-102 Nottingham Road, Keyworth Civil Parish Stops: 25 Trip Duration: 29 min Normanton Lane, Keyworth Line Summary: The Square, Keyworth, Health Normanton Lane, Keyworth Civil Parish Centre, Keyworth, West Close, Keyworth, Croft Road, Keyworth, Spinney Road, Keyworth, Nottingham Platt Lane, Keyworth Road, Keyworth, Normanton Lane, Keyworth, Platt Nicker Hill, Keyworth Civil Parish Lane, Keyworth, Covert Close, Keyworth, Lyncombe Gardens, Keyworth, Shops, Keyworth, Fairway, Covert Close, Keyworth Keyworth, Rowan Drive, Keyworth, Maple Close, Keyworth, Willow Brook School, Keyworth, Lyncombe Gardens, Keyworth Willoughby
    [Show full text]
  • MAILING CONTENTS PAGE.Pub
    Clergy Mailing - July 2018 Contents 1. Nifty Notes 2. Ministry Vacancies Niftynotes news & information from the Diocese www.southwell.anglican.org JULY 2018 Compiled by Nicola Mellors email: [email protected] Mother and son to be ordained at Minster ishop Paul will be ordaining the following BDeacon and Priest candidates at Southwell Minster on the weekend of 30th June – 1st July: Priests - Saturday 30th at 4pm MICHAEL ALLEN - After graduating with a degree in history, Michael was involved in therapeutic work amongst adults with learning disabilities and in secure mental health settings. Karen Hanford and son Richard Michael then trained for ministry Foundation, Birmingham. He is Stapleford Benefice. at Wycliffe Hall, Oxford. He is serving his title with The Revd GARRETH FRANK - Garreth married to Beth and they have Clive Burrows in the Hyson grew up in rural North Wales, two children: Florence (3 ½) and Green & Forest Fields Benefice. before moving to York where he Henry (1 ½). Michael is serving studied History and Politics and his title with The Revd Tim SIMON FELLOWS – Simon is Continued on page 3 Parker in the East Leake, West from Dover and prior to training, Leake, Stanford-on-Soar, he worked for several Christian In this month’s issue: Rempstone and Costock organisations including Operation Benefice. Mobilisation, Lee Abbey 2 Growing Disciples Christian Fellowship and at a NAEEM BAHADUR - Before Christian TV channel. Most 4 News in brief coming to the UK, Naeem recently Simon worked for a ministered in the Presbyterian church in West Bromwich before 5 Prayer diary church for 5 years and his wife moving to Nottingham to train for Rubina worked as a Nurse.
    [Show full text]
  • Polling District. Kirklington Polling District
    N e'W' Polling Districts o~ N ottingham.shire. • NEWARK DIVISION conti1~ued. Farndon Polling District. Kirklington Polling District. NO'f'Well Polling District. The Parishes of Farndon (exclusive The Parishes of Kirklington, Hocker­ The Parishes of Norwell, Bathley, of part added to Newark Parish), ton, Park Leys, and Winkburn. Cll.unton, Cromwell, North Musk. Hawton, East Stoke (exclusive of K1Mesall Polling Di.strict. ham, and Norwell Woodhouse. part added to Newark Parish), and Thorpe. The Parishes ofKneesall, Kerslill, and Oxton Polling District. Maplebeck. The Parishes of Oxton and Calverton. Farnsfield Polling Dist'1'ict. Langar-cum-Barllston Polling District. Radcliffe-on- Trent Polling District. The Parishes of Farnsfleld, Edingley, The Parishe!! of Langar-eum-Barns­ The Parishes of Radcliffe-on-Trent., _and Halam. ton, Granby-cum-Sutton, and Wiv­ Gamston, and Bolme Pierrepont. erton. Flintham Polling J)istriet. Skelton Polling District. The Parishes of Flintham, EIston, Lowdkam Polling Dist1'wt. The Parishes of Shelton, Alverlon! Kneeton, Screveton, and Syerston. The Parishes of Lowdham, Bulcote, Cotham, Flawborough, Kilvington, Harby Polling District. Caythorpe, Epperstone, GonalstoD, Sibthorpe, and Staunton. Gunthorpe, and Hoveringham. The Parishes of Harby, Broadholme, S01.ltkwell Polling District. Thorney, and Wigsley. Newark Polling District. The Parishes of Southwell and Upton. The Parishes of Newark, Winthorpe, Hickli'1lg Polling District. Farndon, 1 That part which has Sutt01t-On-Tre1~t Polling District. The Parishes of Hickling, Broughton and . ~ been added to the The Parishes of Sutton-on- Trent, Sulney, Kinoulton, and Lodge-on­ East Stoke. J.Parish of Newark. CarlOOn-on-Trent, and Ossington. the-Wolds. Normant011,-()n- Trent Polling District.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Changes in SW Rushcliffe – Rationale
    Boundary Changes in SW Rushcliffe – Rationale I have looked at the figures for SW Rushcliffe and compiled the accompanying spreadsheet, which has 2 sheets Current and Proposal. I have used the published 2018 electorate figures. For the variance calculation I have used the published figure of 2078 for 45 seats. Stanford Ward The parishes in Stanford Ward do not have any real affinity or any centre of population. My suggestion is that Stanford disappears and its parishes are absorbed into other wards, including Soar Valley and Leake. This is similar to the situation before the last boundary change. Soar Valley and Gotham Normanton on Soar’s closest links are with Sutton Bonington, so it should be included in Soar Valley. However, Soar Valley is already too large (+24% on old figures, +9% on new figures) and Gotham too small (-3% on old figures, -18% on new figures), so Soar Valley would need to lose Kingston upon Soar and Ratcliffe upon Soar to Gotham Ward. To support this move, it is worth noting that the group of parishes called the “453churches” consists of the five parishes in the proposed Gotham Ward: Gotham, Barton, Thrumpton, Ratcliffe and Kingston. The children from Ratcliffe and Kingston go to Sutton Bonington Primary School, except those from New Kingston, who go to Gotham Primary School. An alternative proposal would be to combine the resulting Soar Valley and Gotham wards into a 2 seat ward, which might be more acceptable to some residents. Leake The current Leake Ward is too small (-2% on old figures, -10% on new figures).
    [Show full text]
  • Charnwood News Summer 2019
    Charnwood News Charnwood Borough Council’s Residents’ Magazine Summer 2019 Outwoods play area Inside this proving popular Issue... – Page 11 Full list of Charnwood Borough councillors Page 18 Summer holiday activity programme Page 5 Packed schedule at Loughborough Town Hall Page 23 Advert Welcome Charnwood News is Charnwood Borough Council’s residents’ magazine. It is sent to every household in the Borough three times a year in March, July and November and is designed to keep residents updated on Council services and local events. The editorial content is provided by the Council’s Communications Team and the magazine is produced at zero cost to taxpayers. The cost of the magazine is met through the sale of advertising. Sales, design, production and distribution are provided by CIS Group Ltd. To advertise or for more information, contact: Telephone: 01253 885777 • Email: [email protected] • www.cispress.com Dear Resident, I’d like to start this invest in our tenants’ homes, and ensuring all column by congratulating our services are of the highest standards. all councillors who were elected in the recent borough We will also be looking at how we can council elections. support our changing high streets. The retail It’s easy to contact us and we’d love to sector is not the same anymore and we hear from you! Out of 52 Members, we have 11 new faces have to think differently to ensure our town and I hope they are looking forward to centres remain vibrant. The Council has a key Charnwood Borough Council Southfield Road, the challenges ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of a Meeting of Costock Parish Council Held on Wednesday February 19, 2020 in the Village Hall at 7.30Pm Couns
    681 Minutes of a meeting of Costock Parish Council held on Wednesday February 19, 2020 in the Village Hall at 7.30pm Couns. Mrs Kath Owen(A) Everard Robinson(in the chair) Mrs Sharon Wilson Peter Gordon Michael Mears Polly Brant(A) John Finney Also present the clerk Mike Elliott and Notts County Council – Rushcliffe Borough Council member Cllr Reg Adair. 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Coun. Kath Owen, Polly Brant. 2 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST There were none 3. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING held on January 15, 2020 were accepted as circulated and signed by the chairman 4. CLERK’S REPORT ` The clerk said the 24 poppies asked for by the council had been ordered and received. 5. REPORT FROM THE DISTRICT AND COUNTY COUNCIL MEMBER Continuing problems of flooding were outlined by Coun. Adair who said many parts of Nottinghamshire were affected. He said the County Council had established a fund from which those residents affected by flooding of their properties could seek help. He said if the council submitted a request to him for funding from his Rushcliffe Borough Council community fund he would be able to allocate £200 to them for their new equipment appeal for the playing field. He suggested a request also be sent to Coun. John Cottee as well. 6. DEFIBRILLATOR Coun. Gordon said he had checked the unit and all was in order. He had placed an order for replacement pads for the unit. A report was given to the meeting by Coun. Gordon in resect of the dinner he was organising at the Generous Briton to raise funds for the playing equipment fund.
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands Airport Community and Environment Investment Report 2007/08
    East Midlands Airport Community and Environment Investment Report 2007/08 www.eastmidlandsairport.com 1 East Midlands Airport Community and Environment Investment Report Contents Inside Education and Employment ...............................................04 Community Engagement ...................................................06 Community Fund ...............................................................08 Employees investing their time ...........................................13 Arts ...................................................................................14 Sports ...............................................................................16 Transport ...........................................................................18 Community Engagement – Page 7 Air Quality Management .....................................................20 Waste Management ..........................................................22 Climate Change .................................................................24 Noise Monitoring ...............................................................26 Noise Complaints ..............................................................28 Sound Insulation Grant Scheme (SIGS) ..............................30 Landscape Management ...................................................31 Employees investing their time – Page 13 Landscape Management – Page 31 Climate Change – Page 24 Sport – Page 17 02 Welcome Welcome The community and environment investment report is designed to communicate some of the
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands 6
    CIVIL UNITED AERODROME ARP 524952N 0011940W AD ELEV 306FT EAST MIDLANDS AVIATION CHART - ICAO EGNX KINGDOM GUND (Geoid Undulation) = RUNWAY/TAXIWAY/APRON PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS The height of the Geoid (MSL) above the APRON / RWY / TWY SURFACE BEARING STRENGTH Reference Elipsoid (WGS 84) at the stated position. RWY 09/27 Grooved Asphalt 78/F/C/W/T AUTHORITY BEARINGS ARE MAGNETIC Central Apron Concrete 63/R/D/X/U ELEVATIONS AND HEIGHTS ARE IN FEET Central-West Apron Concrete 74/R/C/W/T AIP ELEVATIONS IN FEET AMSL 467 East Apron Concrete 63/R/D/X/U HEIGHTS IN FEET ABOVE AD (161) West Apron Concrete 78/R/C/W/T Taxiway A/G/H/M/S/W Asphalt 66/F/C/W/U Taxiway B/F/J Concrete 78/R/C/W/T VAR 1.1°W - 2017 - 1.1°W VAR Taxilane C/CA/D/Q/R/T/U/V Concrete 63/R/D/X/U Taxilane N Concrete 74/R/C/W/T EAST MIDLANDS I-EMW & I-EME N D 109.35 Highest Elev in TDZ 306 I-EMW 109.35D Rwy 27 Thr Elev 282 IEMW Annual Rate IEMW(Ch 30Y)IEME 524952.30N 0011902.87W / (GUND Elevation 160) 524952.88N 0011830.94W 524953.30N 00118.07.30W of Change 0.15°E 524957.99N 0011940.24W (GUND Elevation 160) 357 Radar 322' Rwy 09 Thr Elev 306 (51) 524950.36N 0012048.86W GUND Elevation 161 ILS D GP I-EMEIEME 109.35 (Highest Elev in TDZ) 287 524949.73N 0012123.06W Anemometer VDF 30m 9°M ILS 2269°M6 Stopway Anemometer GP 324 322 2893m x 46m 27 284 (16) PPAPIAPI ((3°)3°) (18) MMEHTEHT 5555 30m 0089°M89°M W Twy Stopway PPAPIAPI ((3°)3°) 09 MMEHTEHT 5555 A1 W1 Twy M S1 332424 332222 W2 A2 Twy H Anemometer ((18)18) Twy G ((16)16) M1 S2 Twy S Fire A3 H1 Station A4 Twy A G1 M2 A6 Twy A A5
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Election Agents' Names and Offices
    Nottinghamshire County Council Elections NOTICE OF ELECTION AGENTS' NAMES AND OFFICES Date Of Election : Thursday 6 May 2021 I HEREBY GIVE NOTICE that the names and addresses of election agents of the candidates at this election, and the addresses of the offices or places of such election agents to which all claims, notices, writs, summons, and other documents addressed to them may be sent, have respectively been declared in writing to me as follows: Bingham East Name of Agent Correspondence Address Name of Candidate THOMAS 50 Abbey Road, Bingham, Nottingham, NG13 8ED BIRD Nicola R Rowan STOCKWOOD 46 Tithby Road, Bingham, Nottingham, NG13 8GP PURDUE-HORAN Maureen Francis Anthoney SWIFT 10 Banks Crescent, Bingham, Nottingham, NG13 8BP SWIFT John Douglas John Douglas MCGREGOR 9 Winster Close, Nottingham, NG9 2SE WILSON Adam Rachel Helen WOOD 10 West Walk, Nottingham, NG2 4QY WOOD Godwin Zoe Bingham West Name of Agent Correspondence Address Name of Candidate BIRCH Burnside, Thorpe In The Glebe, Wysall, Notts, NG12 5QX BIRCH Edward James Ted SMITH MBE Rushcliffe Conservative Association, 17-19 Rectory Road, West CLARKE Graham Neil Bridgford, Nottingham, NG2 6BE Jonathan Neil PRICE 66 Stratford Road, West Bridgford, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, EDWARDS Vicky NG2 6BA John Coningsby ASHMORE 73 Langdale Grove, Bingham, Nottinghamshire, NG13 8SS MERRYWEATHER Allen Herbert Debbie MCGREGOR 9 Winster Close, Nottingham, NG9 2SE WILSON Adam Chandler Pax Dated Thursday 8 April 2021 Katherine Marriott Page 1 of 4 Deputy Returning Officer Printed and
    [Show full text]