DOCSLIB.ORG

Costock CE Primary School in Co-Operation with Costock Pre-School

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Costock CE Primary School in Co-Operation with Costock Pre-School Costock CE Primary School In co-operation with Costock Pre-School School Travel Plan - March 2010 Costock C of E Primary School Main Street Costock Loughborough Leicestershire LE12 6XD Headteacher: Mrs Jane Mellor LEA / DCSF number: 891/3084 Page 1 of 12 Description of the school School Type C of E Primary (Vol. C) Age Range 5 - 11 Number of Pupils and date School 53 (Jan 2010) Number of pupils with SEN statement. None Any travel requirements/access N/A arrangements required School Opening times 8.55 – 3.40 Extended times 4:30 finish for extra-curricular clubs No breakfast club LEA / DCSF 865/2203 Background information and locality description Costock C of E Primary School is a small rural primary school situated in the village of Costock, between Nottingham and Loughborough. The school is situated on Main Street, which runs between Costock Village and East Leake. The catchment area of the school includes the villages of Rempstone and Wysall and a school bus provides transport for pupils from the villages to and from the school. The proportion of pupils entitled to free school meals is below average, as is the number of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. Almost all of the pupils are of White British heritage. The school is committed to achieving the ‘Healthy School’ Gold Status. Extended opening times The school is involved in the School Sports Coordinators project, which provides specialist coaches and a wide variety of sporting activities during the year. These clubs begin at the end of the school day and finish at approximately 4:30. The result of this is a number of children are collected later than the official end of the school day Page 2 of 12 Aerial view of the school Main Street School Transport Links Public/School Transport & Frequency The village is served by: • Notts County Council Premier Travel service number 63, which runs from Beeston to Keyworth • A school bus service that travels; am – Wysall to Rempstone to Costock, pm – Costock to Rempstone to Wysall • A public service covering, Wysall, Costock and East Leake • A private minibus that drops off and collects children using the private nursery These are all infrequent services and so it is essential that users do not miss the few services that are aligned to the school hours. Rail/Tram Links There are no rail or tram links that serve the village of Costock. Page 3 of 12 Main Walking Routes A small number of pupils walk from within the village, using the roads shown on the map below, which are quite narrow in places. The majority are driven or use bus services. Map showing the roads around the school School Bars Hill Development Involvement in School There are no designated cycle routes to/from the school. Involvement in School Travel Activities • All the children in Key Stage 2 take part in the Council’s Road Safety Quiz. • Children in Y5 and Y6 are invited to take part in Nottinghamshire’s cycle training scheme. • A number of children in Y5/6 will take part, May 2010, in the ‘SID the Speed Camera’ project where the speed of cars on Main Street will be investigated. • Road Safety will be introduced as a theme in school for the 2010 summer term. Displays will be around the school reflect the pupils’ activities as part of this theme. Page 4 of 12 Description of Travel Issues The following issues were captured from both the parents’ Baseline Survey (see Appendix 1), conducted January 2010, and, a residents’ survey conducted January 2010. 1. Speeding cars 2. Parking/mounting pavements. Some just to keep moving 3. Bus through the village is a hazard. Buses faster than 30mph 4. No traffic calming near the school 5. Roads too fast. Lives lost last year 6. Speed of cars along Main St. 7. School buses drive too fast (40mph in 30mph zone) 8. The A60 is not suitable for youngsters walking or cycling 9. Double Decker not suitable for country lanes 10. Only 3 pupils on school bus. Why don't more use it? Resident’s issues: 11. Serious congestion at peak times, plus mid-day nursery activities. 12. Large school bus regularly has only 2/3 pupils. 13. Hazardous to exit drive at busy times. 14. Hazard for parents/children crossing between parked cars. 15. Cars overlapping driveways, preventing access/exit – Inconsiderate parents. 16. New housing development will presumably add to the problem 17. Speeding through the village. Note : Issue 8 – Whilst the Steering Group agree with this observation, it is taken as a statement of fact for a busy “A” road. There is no realistic opportunity of changing the nature of the road. No further action Future Developments: There is a housing development close to completion (as at Feb 2010) that will result in approx 25 new houses. See map on page 4. Page 5 of 12 Current Travel Modes Date survey analysed: 21 st January 2010 Number of surveys sent: 52 Number of children accounted for: 37 (71%) AM Results: How pupils usually tra vel to Costock C of E School Bus 7 19% Walk 12 32% Car 18 49% PM Results: How pupils usually travel from Costock C of E Primary School Bus 4 11% Walk 12 32% Car 21 57% Would Like to Travel – Taken from the February 2010 “Hands Up Survey” Car Walk Cycle Public Transport Carshare Other 10 (19%) 20 (38%) 13 (25%) 5 (9%) 5 (9%) 0 (0%) Page 6 of 12 School Travel Plan - Staff Survey Costock C of E Primary School (Feb 2010) Data Protection Act – The personal information collected on this form will be processed on computer to provide and manage the information or service that you have requested. For further details regarding your privacy, please see our privacy statement at; www.nottinghamshire.gov.uk/home/privacystatement.htm (Part numbers below denote more than Surveys Returned: 7 one mode of transport used) Q1. How do you usually travel to school Car Carshare Walk M/cycle Bus Other Train Cycle Totals 7 7 Q2. What would be your preferred mode of travel to school? 6 1 7 Q3. If you don't already do so, would you be willing to carshare? Yes 3 No 3 6 Q4. If yes, what route do you take to school? East Leak to Costock 1 A60 from Loughborough 1 University Blvd, Nottingham Knight 1 Q5. Is there anything either in school or on your journey that would help promote/encourage more sustainable travel for: You Pupils Improved cycle storage/lockers 6 Cycling education 3 Play equipment ? 1 Waiting area for early arrivers 1 Safer crossing points 1 Traffic calming outside school 1 No/Not applicable 6 “Making a Difference by Working Together” Page 7 of 12 Objectives and Targets Objective: Improve safety for pupils and pedestrians in the school vicinity Linked Issues: Numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 14, & 17 Target: Reduce the impact of speeding in the school vicinity / Installation of a 20mph zone on Main Road/Leake Road Action When Who Indicator Achieved. Monitor Notts CC’s five trial sites for Sep 2010 Jane Mellor Trial results conclusions and recommendations (Head) and analysed Apr 2011 Steering Group Apply to Notts CC for an early Application installation (should the scheme be Jane Mellor and submitted rolled out) Steering Group Conduct a Speed Monitoring Exercise 18th May Notts CC (Steve Date booked using Notts CC’s Speed interactive 2010 Stevenson) Road Device - SID. Safety Team, 9.30 to plus year 5 and 6 Positioned along Main Street (which 11.30 pupils becomes Leake Road Produce a summary and submit to Jun 2010 Jane Mellor and Report submitted Notts CC and the local police, as participating evidence of the “Speeding” problem and pupils the need for traffic calming Target: Participate in “Road Safety Education” and courses through 2010 Action When Who Indicator Achieved. Schedule various lessons available in Mar 2010 Jane Mellor Courses Nottinghamshire County Council s schedule for Road Safety booklet others agreed Participate in Notts CC’s Annual Road Dec 2009 Jane Mellor Participated in Dec 2009 Safety Quiz preliminary round Target: Improve childrens safety when cycling Action When Who Indicator Achieved. Engage Nottinghamshire County Feb 2010 Jane Mellor Courses booked Council’s Road Safety team to conduct Level 1 and level 2 cycle safety training for year 5 and 6 pupils. Repeat in 2011 for new year 5 and 6 Feb 2011 Jane Mellor Courses booked pupils Objective: Reduce congestion and promote safe driving and consideration in the school vicinity Linked Issues: Numbers 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 & 17 Target: A reduction in obstructive or dangerous parking on Main Street Action When Who Indicator Achieved. Ask the local PCSO to survey outside Feb 2010 Jane Mellor Location school, attend the May 2010 meeting surveyed and, offer guidance and support in reducing inconsiderate or dangerous parking Page 8 of 12 Target: Run a “School Poster Campaign” to encourage safer and more considerate behaviour by parent drivers Action When Who Indicator Achieved. Conduct a poster campaign amongst Jun 2010 Jane Mellor Posters produced the pupils. Posters aim to promote drivers’ consideration of: • Childrens’ and other pedestrian safety • Speed • Sensible parking, manoeuvring & mounting pavements • Residents continued access • Children wearing seat • Impact on the environment • Health benefits of walking and cycling Produce and distribute: Jul 2010 Jane Mellor Materials • Posters/Banners for school and distributed school perimeter • Parent handouts/newsletter • Material for the school web site Target: Seek opportunities to reduce the impact of staff vehicles in the school vicinity Action When Who Indicator Achieved.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Holme Farm, Wysall Lane, Keyworth, Nottingham £1,500,000
    New Holme Farm, Wysall Lane, Keyworth, Nottingham £1,500,000 New Holme Farm, Property Description Our View Holme Farm occupies a spectacular position in one of the The property is approached via electrically operated gates Wysall Lane, Keyworth, most sought after and superbly accessible locations in the opening onto a driveway that sweeps around to the rural Nottinghamshire, set on the hillside with stunning parking area. The main house has a hearty sense of family Nottingham viewings over the city. In addition to the main house and brings the modern architecture and the rural grounds there are Equestrian facilities comprising of; a stable block together. Consisting of; four large suite bedrooms with housing five stables, feed store and tack room, paddocks, two ensuites and a plush family bathroom. The kitchen is £1,500,000 horse exerciser, an indoor school area and an outdoor area the heart of the house with a huge entertaining space and suitable for a manege. Outbuildings There are a number a country shaker style made from solid oak. The finishing of large constructed outbuildings suitable for a range of touches have been applied throughout to signify quality alternative uses (subject to planning consent). The house with solid oak doors and marble porcelanosa tiles in the and the outbuildings were built on 2004. Grounds grand family bathroom. Through every aspect, from every extending to six acres, the gardens and grounds surround bedroom of the first floor you are surrounded by the wrap the main house and complement it perfectly. around panoramic views. EPC GRADE D Location For full EPC please contact the branch Set in the rolling countryside of rural Notinghamshire on the outskirts of the City, this property is situated within Keyworth which is a highly sought after village.
    [Show full text]
  • 863 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    863 bus time schedule & line map 863 Keyworth - East Leake - Ruddington View In Website Mode The 863 bus line (Keyworth - East Leake - Ruddington) has 3 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) East Leake: 2:46 PM (2) Keyworth: 9:40 AM - 1:40 PM (3) Ruddington: 10:46 AM - 12:46 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 863 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 863 bus arriving. Direction: East Leake 863 bus Time Schedule 25 stops East Leake Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 2:46 PM The Square, Keyworth The Square, Keyworth Civil Parish Tuesday 2:46 PM Health Centre, Keyworth Wednesday 2:46 PM Woodleigh, Keyworth Civil Parish Thursday 2:46 PM West Close, Keyworth Friday 2:46 PM Manor Road, Keyworth Civil Parish Saturday 2:46 PM Croft Road, Keyworth Manor Road, Keyworth Civil Parish Spinney Road, Keyworth 863 bus Info Nottingham Road, Keyworth Direction: East Leake 100-102 Nottingham Road, Keyworth Civil Parish Stops: 25 Trip Duration: 29 min Normanton Lane, Keyworth Line Summary: The Square, Keyworth, Health Normanton Lane, Keyworth Civil Parish Centre, Keyworth, West Close, Keyworth, Croft Road, Keyworth, Spinney Road, Keyworth, Nottingham Platt Lane, Keyworth Road, Keyworth, Normanton Lane, Keyworth, Platt Nicker Hill, Keyworth Civil Parish Lane, Keyworth, Covert Close, Keyworth, Lyncombe Gardens, Keyworth, Shops, Keyworth, Fairway, Covert Close, Keyworth Keyworth, Rowan Drive, Keyworth, Maple Close, Keyworth, Willow Brook School, Keyworth, Lyncombe Gardens, Keyworth Willoughby
    [Show full text]
  • BUNNY BULLETIN December 2019
    BUNNY BULLETIN December 2019 WATER, WATER EVERYWHERE Delivered free to every household in Bunny 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 EDITORIAL There’s only been one topic of conversation around the village in the past few days - the floods which affected many streets at the back end of last week. While some roads have been prone to flooding in the past, this was on a scale not seen before by many residents, particularly those living in Loughborough Road and Moor Lane. It’s too early to be delving deep down into the causes of the floods, although we’ll be taking a proper look at it next month. For now, many thanks are due to those who went above and beyond to help out during the flooding - whether it was taking students to South Wolds after the school bus missed out Bunny entirely, lending their wellies to the postman in Moor Lane so he could complete his deliveries, or any other of the acts of kindness and generosity witnessed. The flooding was at least enough to distract us all from the general election for a few days, but it will be upon us before you know it. The selection (or, more accurately, the non-selection) of candidates has become a hot potato in recent weeks, as parties decide just how far they are willing to compromise in order to get not so much the Government but the Brexit they want. You can read the latest election news on p14, while there’s a round-up of candidates (and their views) on p20/21.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Changes in SW Rushcliffe – Rationale
    Boundary Changes in SW Rushcliffe – Rationale I have looked at the figures for SW Rushcliffe and compiled the accompanying spreadsheet, which has 2 sheets Current and Proposal. I have used the published 2018 electorate figures. For the variance calculation I have used the published figure of 2078 for 45 seats. Stanford Ward The parishes in Stanford Ward do not have any real affinity or any centre of population. My suggestion is that Stanford disappears and its parishes are absorbed into other wards, including Soar Valley and Leake. This is similar to the situation before the last boundary change. Soar Valley and Gotham Normanton on Soar’s closest links are with Sutton Bonington, so it should be included in Soar Valley. However, Soar Valley is already too large (+24% on old figures, +9% on new figures) and Gotham too small (-3% on old figures, -18% on new figures), so Soar Valley would need to lose Kingston upon Soar and Ratcliffe upon Soar to Gotham Ward. To support this move, it is worth noting that the group of parishes called the “453churches” consists of the five parishes in the proposed Gotham Ward: Gotham, Barton, Thrumpton, Ratcliffe and Kingston. The children from Ratcliffe and Kingston go to Sutton Bonington Primary School, except those from New Kingston, who go to Gotham Primary School. An alternative proposal would be to combine the resulting Soar Valley and Gotham wards into a 2 seat ward, which might be more acceptable to some residents. Leake The current Leake Ward is too small (-2% on old figures, -10% on new figures).
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of a Meeting of Wysall and Thorpe in the Glebe Parish Council Held in the Village Hall, Wysall, Tuesday January 7, 2014, at 7.30Pm
    [Page 185/14] Minutes of a meeting of Wysall and Thorpe in the Glebe Parish Council held in the Village Hall, Wysall, Tuesday January 7, 2014, at 7.30pm Couns. David Roberts (Chairman) ` Simon Stephens (Vice-chairman) Carolyn Birch Charlotte James David Grenz Vicki Plant Helen Lewin Also present: Clerk Mike Elliott, Notts County Council member John Cottee, Rushcliffe Borough Council member Fiona Mason and one member of the public. 1] Apologies There were none 2] Declarations of Interest There were none 3] Minutes from previous meeting on December 3, 2013, were accepted as circulated and signed by the chairman 4] Casual vacancy The clerk said there had been no direct request to him in regard to the vacancy. Coun. Grenz proposed and Coun. James seconded the casual vacancy be filled by Lindsay Redfern and this was unanimously approved. The chairman welcomed Coun. Redfern as a new councillor. The new member signed the necessary Acceptance of Office form and took part in the remainder of the meeting. 5] Clerk’s report Contact had been made with the Lottery Heritage Fund in regard to the finalization of the accounts for the restored church clock and the interpretation board and final determination on the financial position would be agreed shortly. Poppy seeds purchased and advice is that the planning needs to be carried in March. The council agreed that some planting be carried out around trees, in the beds at the front of the village hall, and an approach be made to the parish church for some of the seeds to be used there.
    [Show full text]
  • Charnwood News Summer 2019
    Charnwood News Charnwood Borough Council’s Residents’ Magazine Summer 2019 Outwoods play area Inside this proving popular Issue... – Page 11 Full list of Charnwood Borough councillors Page 18 Summer holiday activity programme Page 5 Packed schedule at Loughborough Town Hall Page 23 Advert Welcome Charnwood News is Charnwood Borough Council’s residents’ magazine. It is sent to every household in the Borough three times a year in March, July and November and is designed to keep residents updated on Council services and local events. The editorial content is provided by the Council’s Communications Team and the magazine is produced at zero cost to taxpayers. The cost of the magazine is met through the sale of advertising. Sales, design, production and distribution are provided by CIS Group Ltd. To advertise or for more information, contact: Telephone: 01253 885777 • Email: [email protected] • www.cispress.com Dear Resident, I’d like to start this invest in our tenants’ homes, and ensuring all column by congratulating our services are of the highest standards. all councillors who were elected in the recent borough We will also be looking at how we can council elections. support our changing high streets. The retail It’s easy to contact us and we’d love to sector is not the same anymore and we hear from you! Out of 52 Members, we have 11 new faces have to think differently to ensure our town and I hope they are looking forward to centres remain vibrant. The Council has a key Charnwood Borough Council Southfield Road, the challenges ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Foxhunting and the Landscape Between 1700 and 1900; with Particular Reference to Norfolk and Shropshire
    Foxhunting and the landscape between 1700 and 1900; with particular reference to Norfolk and Shropshire Jane Bevan Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of East Anglia School of History October 2011 This copy of the thesis has been supplied on the condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that no quotation from the thesis, nor any information derived from it, may be published without acknowledgement Abstract This thesis explores the history of foxhunting from 1700 to 1900. It examines how perceptions of an ideal hunting country, and what constituted an elite quarry, altered in tandem with alterations to the English lowland countryside. The relationship between the landscape and changes bought about by the upheaval of enclosure and agricultural development are discussed, in the context of the evolution in practice and geographical spread of foxhunting, at a national, regional and county-wide level. Several long-held beliefs are challenged. The social history of foxhunting and the increased participation of both ‘polite’ urban neophytes and prosperous tenant farmers during the two centuries is compared with the declining involvement of women. The impact of hunt clubs and the rise of subscription packs in the two study areas is contrasted. The influence of changes in the landscape on foxhunting is considered alongside the reciprocal impact of foxhunters manipulating the physical surroundings to enhance their sport. A detailed study of the history of hunting and its most iconic feature, the covert, in Norfolk and Shropshire highlights the importance of landowners control over the countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of a Meeting of Costock Parish Council Held on Wednesday February 19, 2020 in the Village Hall at 7.30Pm Couns
    681 Minutes of a meeting of Costock Parish Council held on Wednesday February 19, 2020 in the Village Hall at 7.30pm Couns. Mrs Kath Owen(A) Everard Robinson(in the chair) Mrs Sharon Wilson Peter Gordon Michael Mears Polly Brant(A) John Finney Also present the clerk Mike Elliott and Notts County Council – Rushcliffe Borough Council member Cllr Reg Adair. 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Coun. Kath Owen, Polly Brant. 2 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST There were none 3. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING held on January 15, 2020 were accepted as circulated and signed by the chairman 4. CLERK’S REPORT ` The clerk said the 24 poppies asked for by the council had been ordered and received. 5. REPORT FROM THE DISTRICT AND COUNTY COUNCIL MEMBER Continuing problems of flooding were outlined by Coun. Adair who said many parts of Nottinghamshire were affected. He said the County Council had established a fund from which those residents affected by flooding of their properties could seek help. He said if the council submitted a request to him for funding from his Rushcliffe Borough Council community fund he would be able to allocate £200 to them for their new equipment appeal for the playing field. He suggested a request also be sent to Coun. John Cottee as well. 6. DEFIBRILLATOR Coun. Gordon said he had checked the unit and all was in order. He had placed an order for replacement pads for the unit. A report was given to the meeting by Coun. Gordon in resect of the dinner he was organising at the Generous Briton to raise funds for the playing equipment fund.
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands Airport Community and Environment Investment Report 2007/08
    East Midlands Airport Community and Environment Investment Report 2007/08 www.eastmidlandsairport.com 1 East Midlands Airport Community and Environment Investment Report Contents Inside Education and Employment ...............................................04 Community Engagement ...................................................06 Community Fund ...............................................................08 Employees investing their time ...........................................13 Arts ...................................................................................14 Sports ...............................................................................16 Transport ...........................................................................18 Community Engagement – Page 7 Air Quality Management .....................................................20 Waste Management ..........................................................22 Climate Change .................................................................24 Noise Monitoring ...............................................................26 Noise Complaints ..............................................................28 Sound Insulation Grant Scheme (SIGS) ..............................30 Landscape Management ...................................................31 Employees investing their time – Page 13 Landscape Management – Page 31 Climate Change – Page 24 Sport – Page 17 02 Welcome Welcome The community and environment investment report is designed to communicate some of the
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands 6
    CIVIL UNITED AERODROME ARP 524952N 0011940W AD ELEV 306FT EAST MIDLANDS AVIATION CHART - ICAO EGNX KINGDOM GUND (Geoid Undulation) = RUNWAY/TAXIWAY/APRON PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS The height of the Geoid (MSL) above the APRON / RWY / TWY SURFACE BEARING STRENGTH Reference Elipsoid (WGS 84) at the stated position. RWY 09/27 Grooved Asphalt 78/F/C/W/T AUTHORITY BEARINGS ARE MAGNETIC Central Apron Concrete 63/R/D/X/U ELEVATIONS AND HEIGHTS ARE IN FEET Central-West Apron Concrete 74/R/C/W/T AIP ELEVATIONS IN FEET AMSL 467 East Apron Concrete 63/R/D/X/U HEIGHTS IN FEET ABOVE AD (161) West Apron Concrete 78/R/C/W/T Taxiway A/G/H/M/S/W Asphalt 66/F/C/W/U Taxiway B/F/J Concrete 78/R/C/W/T VAR 1.1°W - 2017 - 1.1°W VAR Taxilane C/CA/D/Q/R/T/U/V Concrete 63/R/D/X/U Taxilane N Concrete 74/R/C/W/T EAST MIDLANDS I-EMW & I-EME N D 109.35 Highest Elev in TDZ 306 I-EMW 109.35D Rwy 27 Thr Elev 282 IEMW Annual Rate IEMW(Ch 30Y)IEME 524952.30N 0011902.87W / (GUND Elevation 160) 524952.88N 0011830.94W 524953.30N 00118.07.30W of Change 0.15°E 524957.99N 0011940.24W (GUND Elevation 160) 357 Radar 322' Rwy 09 Thr Elev 306 (51) 524950.36N 0012048.86W GUND Elevation 161 ILS D GP I-EMEIEME 109.35 (Highest Elev in TDZ) 287 524949.73N 0012123.06W Anemometer VDF 30m 9°M ILS 2269°M6 Stopway Anemometer GP 324 322 2893m x 46m 27 284 (16) PPAPIAPI ((3°)3°) (18) MMEHTEHT 5555 30m 0089°M89°M W Twy Stopway PPAPIAPI ((3°)3°) 09 MMEHTEHT 5555 A1 W1 Twy M S1 332424 332222 W2 A2 Twy H Anemometer ((18)18) Twy G ((16)16) M1 S2 Twy S Fire A3 H1 Station A4 Twy A G1 M2 A6 Twy A A5
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Election Agents' Names and Offices
    Nottinghamshire County Council Elections NOTICE OF ELECTION AGENTS' NAMES AND OFFICES Date Of Election : Thursday 6 May 2021 I HEREBY GIVE NOTICE that the names and addresses of election agents of the candidates at this election, and the addresses of the offices or places of such election agents to which all claims, notices, writs, summons, and other documents addressed to them may be sent, have respectively been declared in writing to me as follows: Bingham East Name of Agent Correspondence Address Name of Candidate THOMAS 50 Abbey Road, Bingham, Nottingham, NG13 8ED BIRD Nicola R Rowan STOCKWOOD 46 Tithby Road, Bingham, Nottingham, NG13 8GP PURDUE-HORAN Maureen Francis Anthoney SWIFT 10 Banks Crescent, Bingham, Nottingham, NG13 8BP SWIFT John Douglas John Douglas MCGREGOR 9 Winster Close, Nottingham, NG9 2SE WILSON Adam Rachel Helen WOOD 10 West Walk, Nottingham, NG2 4QY WOOD Godwin Zoe Bingham West Name of Agent Correspondence Address Name of Candidate BIRCH Burnside, Thorpe In The Glebe, Wysall, Notts, NG12 5QX BIRCH Edward James Ted SMITH MBE Rushcliffe Conservative Association, 17-19 Rectory Road, West CLARKE Graham Neil Bridgford, Nottingham, NG2 6BE Jonathan Neil PRICE 66 Stratford Road, West Bridgford, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, EDWARDS Vicky NG2 6BA John Coningsby ASHMORE 73 Langdale Grove, Bingham, Nottinghamshire, NG13 8SS MERRYWEATHER Allen Herbert Debbie MCGREGOR 9 Winster Close, Nottingham, NG9 2SE WILSON Adam Chandler Pax Dated Thursday 8 April 2021 Katherine Marriott Page 1 of 4 Deputy Returning Officer Printed and
    [Show full text]
  • [Page 135 / 11] Minutes of a Meeting of Wysall and Thorpe in the Glebe Parish Council Held in the Village Hall, Wysall, Tuesday September 6 at 7.30Pm Couns
    [Page 135 / 11] Minutes of a Meeting of Wysall and Thorpe in the Glebe Parish Council held in the Village Hall, Wysall, Tuesday September 6 at 7.30pm Couns. Charlotte James (Chairman) Simon Stephens (Vice-chairman) Helen Lewin Mary Elston Alison Avery Carolyn Birch David Roberts Philip Harris Also present: The clerk Mike Elliott. 1] Apologies There were none. 2] Declarations of Interest There were none. 3] Minutes from previous meeting held on July 5, 2011, were accepted as circulated and signed by the chairman. 4] Clerk’s report Following the request by the parish council for the clerk to ascertain if any payments had been made towards the church for grass cutting of the churchyard, information held in the accounts had shown that no payment had been made for that purpose since the financial year 2004/2005, the last year for which accounts were held electronically. The clerk said the office had spoken four times to the FCH Housing Trust whose telephone number had changed three times since the council held its records and while each time it had promised to find someone to ring back, that never happened. He said he would continue trying to talk to it in regard to the system it uses for allocation of the properties at Little Lincoln in Wysall. The clerk was asked to contact Rushcliffe Borough Council and the Environment Agency in relation to the continuing activities concerning trade waste at Kingston Brook Farm, Thorpe. There had been no action in regard to the reinstatement of the missing direction sign at the Bradmore Lane junction and the clerk was asked to again seek help from Coun.
    [Show full text]