DOCSLIB.ORG

PM's Decisive Push for Peace in J&K

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PM's Decisive Push for Peace in J&K SATURDAY, MARCH 2, 2019 DAILY EXCELSIOR, JAMMU daily Excelsior Established 1965 PM's decisive push for peace in J&K Founder Editor S.D. Rohmetra Rajan Gandhi sequent statement of their minis- after partition which tilted the cen- walk on fire and ultimately both ed NIA raids on separatists. even at PHC. Enough stocking of ter that Pakistan was ready but tre of power from Jammu to Kash- PDPand NC came up with famous Enough forces have been petrol, diesel and cooking gas is ulwama suicide attack and since it was dark they couldn't mir and still not satisfied plotted Shri Amarnath agitation of 2008 deployed to counter any attempt done specially in Kashmir keep- Noose tightens around resultant martyrdom of counter the attack and still more against India what is known as and due to petty politics of these to vitiate the atmosphere of the ing in view the road condition of Pforty plus jawans left the amusing was the statement of their 'Kashmir Conspiracy' due to two Kashmir centric parties rift state. With air strike on Pakistani NH and weather. terrorist Masood Azhar whole nation shell shocked along defence spokesman claiming that which he was jailed but continued between Kashmir and Jammu fur- soil the bluff of Omar, Farooq or All said and done every war with anger. Huge gathering of they could have retaliated but his anti India activities through ther widened. After 2008 State Mehbooba has been exposed and has its pros and cons and definite- onsequent upon more and more countries people assembled for paying their Indian fighter jets were air borne Plebiscite Front till partition of Assembly elections Omar came to if we analyze the indicators up till ly a price, be it materialistic or sharing India's concerns over the scourge homage and last rites itself speak for a very short time. Whole world Pakistan and creation of power and PDP postured pro Pak- now Modi Government is not life of jawans or for that matter about the sentiments of general of Pakistan bred and sponsored terrorism, is with India, not a single country Bangladesh in 1971. After this istan, pro separatist stance which going to spare anyone who is try- civilians and every Indian should C public and chorus of decisive in the world came out with anti Sheikh Abdullah realized that his just added fuel to fire and valley ing to foment any trouble in Kash- be prepared for the ultimate sac- as also as a sequel to Indian leadership's suc- action against Pakistan grew and India statement which itself is sig- independence or pro Pakistan tilt remained on boil. After 2014 elec- mir. Central agencies have nailed rifice. One of our pilot is in their cessfully upping diplomatic campaign against calculative words of PM Modi nificant as it shows the successful was no more relevant and thus the tions again PDP got the reins of separatists and days are not far custody and Government is put- that 'Woh bahut badi galti kar isolation of Pakistan worldwide. famous Indira-Sheikh accord was power this time in alliance with behind when these dynast politi- ting every effort be it direct talks Pakistan in explicitly and implicitly patronising chukae haen aur unko iski keemat terrorism and sending terrorists across the border Much more significant is the implemented and afterwards BJP and this time NC waging cians will find themselves totally with Pakistan or diplomatic chukani padegi' (they have done internal news of our own state, Rajiv-Farooq accord came into Twitter war with inciting tweets irrelevant in state politics in this channels from other countries a fresh proposal is mooted to be moved in the UN a blunder and they have to pay for Jammu and Kashmir, which has existence and subsequently day and night. Practically speak- new India. and as such there is no need to Security Council to designate JeM chief Masood it) echoed the mood of the coun- been bone of contention between arrival of full fledged militancy in ing any of these parties once in On the other hand Pakistan in press the panic button and put try. PM was quite clear in his two countries. Interesting is the our state after CM Farooq Abdul- power are pro India and pro Pak- a desperate move has made alive unnecessary pressure on the Azhar as a global terrorist. The countries taking approach and authorized the fresh lead in this connection are the United fact that Leh- Ladakh constitutes lah resigned as he abdicated his istan whenever out of power to the whole LOC and IB with the result- Government and Indian hard line defence forces to formulate the around 60 percent of area of Jam- constitutional responsibilities and extent that these two bitter rivals ant threat to our civilian popula- has already paid as Pakistan has States, the UK and France. Once it is done, the strategy to retaliate at appropriate mu and kashmir, Jammu division went to London. Migration of joined hands to foment trouble for tion. To counter this immediate cracked as their PM Imran Khan said terrorist would be subjected to a travel ban time and place and even Ameri- 25 percent and rest 15 percent is Kashmiri Pundits followed, NDA Government. Height of vacating border area should be the has declared in their Parliament can President dropped the hint that of Kashmir Division. In Kashmir death-destruction-fear ruled the hypocrisy of these two parties can top priority of state administra- to release our pilot on Friday. Let globally, asset freeze and other punitive actions. India was planning something He would thus be vulnerable to be hunted and also, 10 percent population is of state from 1990 to 1996 as the be gauged from the fact that both tion. In case of absence of our Government do their job big. Everyone was under suspense Shia muslims who do not support state was put under Governor's of them boycotted panchayat and bunkers civilian population whatever it may be in the interest subjected to rigors of law. what next and when but one thing pro Pakistan agenda followed by rule and ultimately after 1996 local bodies elections on the issue should be immediately shifted to of the Nation. Lack of punitive All the three countries are wielding veto powers was very much clear that every separatists and as per official elections once again Farooq of Article 35 Aand are now insist- safer places with adequate facil- actions had instilled helplessness Indian has full faith in our forces in a 15 member nations' Security Council and thus reports its only two/three districts Abdullah became the CM and his ing on to hold state elections with ities and not just stop gap in we Indians till now but now and ultimately on the morning of which are the hub of terrorism. It son Omar Abdullah at one time Parliamentary elections though arrangements. Another impor- India has crossed the Rubicon, be carry much significance. The Sanction Committee 26th February, 2019 nation woke is imperative to mention here that was MoS for External Affairs same Article 35A is aligned to tant aspect is flow of proper defensive doctrine has been of the Security Council must consider and see the up with the news of lifetime, yes right from the time of Sheikh Ministry in Vajpayee Govern- come up in Supreme Court. information as rumours and mis- shunned completely as in the past proposal through within its stipulated 10 working Indian Air force had undertaken Mohammed Abdullah blackmail- ment. Under NDAGovernment of Mehbooba, Omar and Farooq are information are the biggest pan- also this Indian Government has pre emptive air strike deep inside days. However, one more bid in this regard should ing India in the name of Pakistan Vajpayee in 2002 state elections giving statement after statement ic creators among public as such publicised the surgical strikes as Pakistan and destroyed three JeM has been the forte of Kashmir cen- were held which are said to be first just to score brownie points with- immediate setup of control such the Balakote raids signals not go astray like the earlier three in past ten terror camps, biggest being at Bal- tric politicians, be it sidelining of fair and free elections of the val- out caring what damage these rooms at district level with well clear message to Pakistan - old years. Pakistan and its blue boy terrorist Masood akote and as per reports three hun- Maharaja Hari Singh, insistence ley and despite only 16 MLAs statements make to national publicized contact numbers is the rules of the game have changed, dred terrorists including top cadre of grant of special status and even Mufti Mohammad Sayeed's PDP cause. need of the hour. Special task it's a new dynamic India who will has been getting a reprieve due to unwarranted of Jaish and number of their han- posture and standing taken by China by after getting it to the extent that was allowed to form the Govern- But PM Modi being strong force should be at place to check not take their thousand razor cuts dlers have been successfully elim- Jammu and Kashmir was the only ment in alliance with Congress man of principle decided that hoarding, black marketing and lying down. Mission is still (mis)using its veto powers. Though there has inated. More intriguing is the fact state in whole India to have sepa- with three year rotational CM for- enough is enough and as such ensure proper supplies of essen- incomplete but Pakistan has no been some significant departure in its policy of that 12 Mirage 2000 took part in rate flag, separate constitution, mula, first three Mufti and subse- internal corrective actions were tial commodities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Socio-Economic Development During Sheikh Abdullah's
    International Journal of Management and Applied Science, ISSN: 2394-7926 Volume-4, Issue-7, Jul.-2018 http://iraj.in SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DURING SHEIKH ABDULLAH’S PERIOD MOHD. IQBAL WANI PhD. Researcher, Research Centre: - Govt. Hamidia Arts & Commerce College Bhopal (M.P) University, Bharkatullah University Bhopal M.P. E-mail: [email protected] I. INTRODUCTION For this purpose a National Industrial Council is to be set up. About transport manifesto said that anything Sheikh Abdullah (5th December 1905-8th September done for the regeneration of the country must plan 1982) was a Kashmiri politician who played a central simultaneous development of the means of role in the politics of Jammu & Kashmir, the communication and transport. Hence it was proposed northernmost Indian state. The self-styled “ Shere- top set up a National Communications Council Kashmir” (Lion of Kashmir), Abdullah was the consisting of engineering experts and economic founding leader of the Jammu and Kashmir National advisers. The distribution system being the “vital Conference and the 2nd Prime Minister of Princely cornerstone of any planned economy”, it was state J&K and 4th Chief Minister of Jammu and proposed to establish the National Marketing Council Kashmir. He agitated against the rule of the Maharaja costing of business experts and economic advisers. Hari Singh and urged self-rule for Kashmir. On the The National Public Health Council was suggested to last day of Oct 1947 Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah be established for safeguarding the health of the who had led the people of Jammu and Kashmir to citizens. This would propose that every, 1,500 people revolt against serfdom for nearly two decades was will have a doctor, every village a medical attendant, charged to deal with the emergency which had starting of a medical college, encouragement of both suddenly arisen as a result of Pakistan invasion of the Ayurvedic and Union systems of medicines.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on 120 Days 5Th August to 5Th December by Association Of
    120 Days 5th August to 5th December Table of Contents About APDP 2 Acknowledgements 3 Executive Summary 5 Introduction 6 Abrogation of 370 9 Detentions and Torture 15 Media, Journalism and Communication 23 Access to Healthcare 32 Education and Children 42 Essential Commodities and Barrier to Trade 53 Impact on Religious Freedom 58 Access to Justice 65 Annexure 83 1 Association of Parents of Disappeared Persons (APDP) Association of Parents of Disappeared Persons (APDP) is a collective of relatives of victims of enforced and involuntary disappearances in Kashmir. The APDP was formed in 1994 to organize efforts to seek justice and get information on the whereabouts of missing family members. It presently consists of family members of about one thousand victims. APDP actively campaigns for an end to the practice and crime of involuntary and enforced disappearances at local, national and international platforms. Members of the APDP have been engaged in documenting enforced disappearances in Kashmir since 1989 and have collected information on over one thousand such cases, so far. On the 10th of each month families of the disappeared come together under the aegis of APDP to hold a public protest in Srinagar to commemorate the disappearance of their loved ones and to seek answers from the state about the whereabouts of the missing persons. In light of the recent human rights violation APDP has taken the decision to come forward and bring notice to the current situation. 2 Acknowledgement This report is a result of tireless and bold efforts put in by people from various backgrounds. The report was edited by Shahid Malik, and compiled by Sukriti Khurana and Aarash.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Broken Social Contracts and Ethnic Violence: the Case of Kashmir
    1 Working Paper no.75 OF BROKEN SOCIAL CONTRACTS AND ETHNIC VIOLENCE: THE CASE OF KASHMIR Neera Chandhoke Developing Countries Research Centre University of Delhi, India December 2005 Copyright © Neera Chandhoke, 2005 Although every effort is made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of material published in this Working Paper, the Crisis States Research Centre and LSE accept no responsibility for the veracity of claims or accuracy of information provided by contributors. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing of the publisher nor be issued to the public or circulated in any form other than that in which it is published. Requests for permission to reproduce this Working Paper, of any part thereof, should be sent to: The Editor, Crisis States Research Centre, DESTIN, LSE, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE. Crisis States Research Centre Of Broken Social Contracts and Ethnic Violence: The Case of Kashmir Neera Chandhoke Developing Countries Research Centre, University of Delhi How to find a form of association which will defend the person and goods of each member with the collective force of all, and under which each individual, while uniting himself with the others, obeys no one but himself, and remains as free as before. This is the fundamental problem to which the social contract holds the solution Jean Jacques Rousseau1 Introduction Though what is euphemistically termed ‘the Kashmir problem’ has stalked political life in India since the advent of independence in 1947, it was really in 1988 that the issue acquired serious proportions.
    [Show full text]
  • Impasse at the United Nations
    01-0290-0 ch1.qxd 3/15/09 10:58 AM Page 9 1 Impasse at the United Nations Before the 1947 partition of India, few Americans knew or cared about the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir. Tucked away in the high western Himalayas, Kashmir, as it was commonly called, was an amalgam of territories widely varied in language, culture, religion, ethnicity, and eco- nomic development. Its disparate regions had been cobbled together by the dynastic ambitions of the state’s rulers abetted by British imperial design. In the first half of the nineteenth century, these maharajas, Hindus of the Dogra ethnic group based in the Jammu area of the state, had with British backing created one of the largest states in Britain’s Indian empire. Situated along India’s border with China, touching Afghanistan, and close to the Central Asian regions of Czarist Russia and, later, the Soviet Union, it was also one of the most strategically placed. What little American interest there was in Kashmir before rival Indian and Pakistani claims brought the state to international attention in late 1947 was confined to occasional private visitors. A handful of traders came to the state to purchase carpets, papier mâché, and other handicrafts for export to the U.S. market. American missionary activity was limited; the state was the preserve of mainly British church groups. A few American tourists interested in exotic places and wealthy enough to get to them visited the state. During World War II, U.S. servicemen operating in the China-Burma-India theater went to Kashmir on leave to lounge on houseboats and get away from the heat and dust of the Indian plains.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indo-Pak Rivalry and the Kashmir Issue: a Historical Analysis in the Security Context of the South Asia
    Journal of Political Studies, Vol. 26, Issue - 2, 2019, 73:84 The Indo-Pak Rivalry and the Kashmir Issue: A Historical Analysis in the Security Context of the South Asia Dr. Syed Shahbaz Hussain, Ghulam Mustafa, Muhammad Imran, Adnan Nawaz Abstract The Kashmir issue is a primary source of resentment between India and Pakistan. It is considered the oldest issue on the schedule of the Security Council yet to be resolved. This divisive issue remained unsolved and has become the nuclear flashpoint. The peace of the South Asian region is severely contingent upon the peaceful resolution of the Kashmir dispute. It is not only the pivot of bitterness in the bilateral relation of India and Pakistan, it also a continuous threat to the regional peace in South Asia. This study critically assesses and evaluated the issue in the perspective of historical facts and current context regarding Kashmir. Chronological data presented and describe that the Kashmir issue has deteriorated the fragile security of South Asian region and remained a continuous threat of nuclear escalation in the region. Kashmir issue has severe implications for populace of Kashmir as well as for the region. Keywords: Kashmir Issue, Indo-Pak Rivalry, Security Issues, South Asia, Human Right Violation. Introduction South Asia is considered the most militarized zone of the globe where two nuclear rivals, Pakistan and India, are competing over arm race. The development and economic prosperity of South Asia is traumatized by Indo-Pak rivalry which is deeply rooted in South Asia due to structural asymmetry resulted from faulty distribution of boundaries. Kashmir dispute is the pivotal point of Indo-Pak rivalry which has further aggravated the complex strategic environment of South Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • J&K Information Bochure
    FAQs on the State of Jammu and Kashmir Executive Summary Section I: J&K – An Integral Part of India Q1 What is the legal basis for J&K’s status as an integral part of India? Q2 Why did J&K accede to India? Q3 Why did India go to the UN? Q4 Why were the UN Resolutions not fulfilled? Q5 What does the Simla Agreement say? Q6 What does the international law say about the Right to Self-determination? Section II: Unique Status of J&K Q1 What is the Constitution of J&K? Q2 What did Sheikh Abdullah say at the inaugural session of J&K’s Constituent Assembly on 5 November 1951? Q3 What are the administrative arrangements for governing J&K? Section III: The people of J&K Q1 Who are the Kashmiris? Q2 What is Kashmiriyat? Q3 How big is the J&K economy? Q4 What is Jammu and Kashmir famous for? Section IV: Terrorism in J&K Q1 How does Pakistan see J&K? Q2 How does Pakistan support terrorism in J&K? Q3 What does the world say about Pakistan’s role as a sponsor of terrorism? Q4 What did Pakistan commit on 6th January 2004? Q5 Whose terror is Pakistan a victim of? Page 1 of 46 Section V: Human Rights Situation in J&K Q1 What is the OHCHR (Office of UN’s High Commissioner for Human Rights) Report on the Situation of Human Rights in Kashmir of 14 June 2018? Q2 What has happened to the Hindus in J&K? Q3 How have the people of J&K exercised their civil and political rights? Q4 What socio-economic developmental activities have taken place in J&K? Section VI: Illegal Occupation of J&K by Pakistan Q1 Which parts of J&K are occupied by Pakistan? Q2 What is Aksai Chin? Section VII: Situation in PoJK Q1 What is the Human Rights situation in PoJK? Q2 What are the restrictions on the Rights to Freedom of Expression in PoJK? Page 2 of 46 Executive Summary The State of Jammu and Kashmir with a population of 12.5 million is one of India’s 29 States.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in Kashmir After Article 370 Ayjaz Wani
    JANUARY 2020 Life in Kashmir After Article 370 Ayjaz Wani Children watch as clashes erupt between government forces and protesters against the revocation of Article 370. Srinagar, 30 August 2019. Photo: Yawar Nazir/Getty Images Attribution: Ayjaz Wani, ‘Life in Kashmir After Article 370’, ORF Special Report No. 99, January 2020, Observer Research Foundation. Observer Research Foundation (ORF) is a public policy think tank that aims to influence formulation of policies for building a strong and prosperous India. ORF pursues these goals by providing informed and productive inputs, in-depth research, and stimulating discussions. ISBN: 978-93-89622-57-7 © 2020 Observer Research Foundation. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, copied, archived, retained or transmitted through print, speech or electronic media without prior written approval from ORF. Life in Kashmir After Article 370 ABSTRACT This special report analyses insights gathered by the author from different sections of the Kashmir public regarding the impact of the abrogation of Article 370 on their lives. The interviews were supplemented by secondary sources, primarily news reports in the national and international media after 5 August 2019, when the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led government of India abrogated the enforcement of Article 370 of the Constitution, which since 1950 has given near-autonomy to the state of Jammu & Kashmir (J&K). On the basis of these findings, this report makes recommendations for the way forward. INTRODUCTION The long-drawn armed conflict in Kashmir has claimed thousands of lives and made the economy bleed, and has posed grave threats to the country’s security.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Consciousness of the Muslims in Jammu and Kashmir State 1846-1947
    Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan Volume No. 56, Issue No. 1 (January - June, 2019) Raja Nazakat Ali * Afaq Ahmed Khan** Asghar Iqbal*** Political Consciousness of the Muslims in Jammu and Kashmir State 1846-1947 Abstract The history of nationalism and political consciousness in the Jammu and Kashmir (J&K State has a great importance. Political activism and freedom struggle in the J&K state had passed through various vicissitudes immediate after the foundation of Dogra Rule. The Dogra rule started in 1846 and ended in 1947. Kashmiri Muslims have seen have seen worst type exploitations and oppression during this rule. The present paper aims at discussing the Dogra rule and unjust behavior of rulers and their authorities with Muslim subject. It is followed by the aspirations of Muslim community and subsequent political, social and religious activism. The paper also discusses the formation of socio-political organizations, which tried to safeguard and secured the political, economic and social rights and interests of concerned community. Key Words: J&K, Muslims, Social Reform Organizations, Political Consciousness, Muslim Conference. Introduction: Dogra Dynasty in Jammu and Kashmir (J&K1) was an out-come of the Treaty of Amritsar, inked on 16 March 1846 between the Britishers of subcontinent and Maharaja Gulab Singh). The Dogra Maharaja Gulab Singh made payment of 7.5 million Nankshahi to the British Government to get the area the area between River Ravi and River Indus2. Gubab Singh’s rule was unfair and unpopular to the Muslims of Kashmir, which dissatisfied the majority of population. The J&K was a Muslim majority state having 77% Muslim population.3 They raised their voices against inequities between Hindus and Muslims, and poor quality of education, less employment prospects and corruption and bad governing system.
    [Show full text]
  • Kashmir; in Historical Perspective
    Nisar. A. Malik * Co-Author: Abdul Majid ** Kashmir; in Historical Perspective Abstract The most beautiful and fabulous valley of the world is called as Kashmir Jannat Nazeer, a paradise on earth. In the same manner, the people dwelling there are sober, hospitable, kind, intelligent and beautiful as well. With these values notwithstanding, they have been suffering economically, politically as well as educationally for centuries. Struggling hard to overcome these hardships and for freedom from alien yoke, for centuries the Muslims of Kashmir have offered numberless sacrifices setting precedence of bravery in the history. It is hoped that their sacrifices would prove to be fruitful and the darkness of serfdom would become to an end. It would be noteworthy to note here that the hardships they had to face during Dogra rule were ignominious; however, the oppression and atrocities committed by the Indian forces following the forceful occupation, are many folds and eclipse the Dogra brutalities. The Dogras had purchased Kashmir for Rs. 7.5 million, therefore considered it as their personal property and the people residing in their personal serfs. But the Indian occupied forces after 1947, forcefully usurped the territory considering it as "integral part" against the wishes of Kashmiri. Key Words: Ladakh, Dogra, Dravadian, Aryan, Buddist, Jains, Zoras, INTRODUCTION The term Kashmir in fact from time immemorial, applies to the valley of river Jhelum on the uneven oval plateau, with an average height of 1524 meters. Kashmir geographically is a part of South Asia bordering with India, China, Pakistan and Afghanistan. It had different boundaries with different areas .The territory known as Kashmir having three provinces i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Kashmir Conflict
    K a s h mi r C o n f l i c t : A S t u d y o f W h a t L e d t o t h e I n s u r g e n c y i n K a s h m i r V a l l e y & P r o p o s e d F u t u r e S o l u t i o n s By P r iy an k a Bak ay a and S u meet Bh at t i 1 Introduction Throughout ancient times, the breathtakingly beautiful Valley of Kashmir has stood for peaceful contemplation, intellectual advancement and religious diversity co- existing in an atmosphere of tolerance for the most part. In the modern geopolitical era, this same diversity, evident from the blend of Islam, Hinduism, Sikhism and Buddhism in this single state, has made it a center of warfare rather than cultural advancement. In the late 1980s, an insurgency in the valley threatened not only to rip Kashmir apart, but also pull the rest of the world into a dangerous war. In this paper, we will examine the major reasons for the insurgency, and why it only gained momentum some 40 years after India’s partition. Finally, we will explore some of the modern-day proposed solutions to the ongoing conflict over Kashmir. In order to gain a better understanding of why the insurgency of 1987-89 took place, we will examine the origins and development of the Kashmir independence movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Kashmir Dispute Since 1947
    The Kashmir Dispute since 1947 Philip Constable University of Central Lancashire, UK Abstract: The Kashmir conflict was a legacy of the partition of India in 1947. Both India and Pakistan claimed sovereignty over Kashmir leading to regional wars in 1947-48, 1965 and 1999, as well as to its relevance in the secession of Bangladesh in 1971. The Kashmir conflict drew international attention during the Cold War as the United States, USSR and China sought to have strategic influence in South Asia, while preferring not to be militarily involved. Within this dispute, Kashmir pursued its own autonomy and independence of regional power interference from the late 1940s. This movement, initially under the National Conference Party led by Sheikh Abdullah, turned to the militant insurgency of the Jammu- Kashmir Liberation Front in the 1980s. Kashmir reflects the difficulties that India and Pakistan have experienced since 1947 in terms of nationalist secession and the increasingly militant measures that nationalist insurgencies have taken for autonomy and independence. Main Text: The Kashmir dispute has its roots in the British colonial period and partition of British- India between India and Pakistan in 1947. British rule had utilised Hindu-Muslim communal tensions to divide nationalist opposition into a majority Hindu Congress Party and minority Muslim League from the 1920s. These divisions became magnified by wider electorates after 1935 leading to Muslim League concern over the influence of a majority Hindu Congress in an independent India and consequently demands for a Pakistani state. A logic of partition became the strategic consolidation of two sovereign states focused around acceptance or rejection of a two-nation theory which affirmed that Muslims were a separate nationality in South Asia and regions with Muslims in a demographic majority in the northwest and northeast should form a separate nation-state.
    [Show full text]
  • E!Xplainintg the Sumit Ganguly Kashmir Insurgency
    E!xplainintg the Sumit Ganguly Kashmir Insurgency Political Mobilization and Institutional Decay 0n December 8, 1989, members of the Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front kidnapped Dr. Rubiya Sayeed, the daughter of the Indian Minister of Home Affairs, as she left a government hospital in Srinagar. The kidnappers refused to release her until several incarcerated members of their outlawed group were released. Follow- ing hasty negotiations over the next several days, the government in New Delhi agreed to meet the abductors' demands. In the weeks and months that fol- lowed, dozens of insurgent groups emerged and wreaked havoc throughout the Kashmir Valley, killing government officials, security personnel, and inno- cent bystanders. Although they were of varying ideological orientations, all the insurgent groups professed opposition to Indian rule in Jammu and Kashmir, and the authority of the Indian state virtually collapsed there. Since December 1989, the strength of the insurgency in Jammu and Kashmir has fluctuated.' Faced with the wrath of many of the Islamic militant groups, more than 200,000 Hindus (known as Pandits) have fled the Kashmir Valley. Currently, nearly 400,000 Indian Army and paramilitary troops are deployed in the state. The security forces are battling at least a dozen major insurgent groups of varying size and ideological orientation, as well as dozens more minor operations. The more prominent of the insurgent groups include the nominally secular, pro-independence Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF) and the radical Islamic and pro-Pakistani groups Hizb-ul-Mujahideen (HUM), Hizbollah, Harkat-ul-Ansar, and Ikhwanul Muslimeen. At least 15,000 Sumit Ganguly is Professor of Political Science at Hunter College and at the Graduate Center, City University of New York.
    [Show full text]