Listed Buildings Prosecutions Database Commentary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Listed Buildings Prosecutions Database Commentary LISTED BUILDINGS PROSECUTIONS DATABASE COMMENTARY Compiled by Bob Kindred MBE BA IHBC MRTPI [email protected] Edition 7 - January 2017 LISTED BUILDING PROSECUTIONS This resume is a response to requests from the courts and local planning authorities for additional information about individual cases beyond the standard short summary in the IHBC Listed Buildings Prosecutions Database [q.v.]. Where further material has been made available it is set out for ease of reference below in alphabetical order of the authorities concerned. Readers should bear in mind the dates of cases. Penalties for offences under Section 7 (and more uncommonly S.59) of the Planning (Listed Buildings & Conservation Areas) Act 1990 were increased by the Planning & Compensation Act 1990 with effect from 25th September 1991. Up to that date the maximum fine per offence in the Magistrates Court was £2,000 but after that date fines were increased to £20,000 (but were unlimited in the Crown Court). References to English Heritage pre-date the formation of Historic England in April 2015 ______________________________________________________________________ Aylesbury Vale District Council [10-2014] Church Farm, Stratford Road, Nash Listed Grade 2. Unauthorised work was carried out to the 17th century farmhouse by dismantling the walls and removing the timbers leaving only two partly rebuilt chimneystacks intact. Mr. Simon Lascelles of St Albans, pleaded guilty at Milton Keynes Magistrates’ Court was fined £6,000 and costs of £24,401. The court found significant culpability on Mr. Lascelles’ part, as he was well aware of the statutory significance of the building in architectural and historical terms and knew when the works were executed that they were not authorised, and there was some attempt at financial gain. The prosecution was initiated by the Council after enforcement officers were made aware of the work. In 2010, the Council had applied to the High Court for an injunction to prevent further breaches of listed building control. This resulted in Mr. Lascelles providing a written undertaking to cease unauthorised works until outstanding applications for permission were determined. A temporary stop notice was issued in 2011 requiring the unauthorised works to stop. An Enforcement Notice was also issued requiring certain remedial steps to be undertaken. Later that year, an appeal against the council’s refusal to grant planning permission and listed building consent was dismissed by the Planning Inspectorate, as was an appeal against the Enforcement Notice. (Source LPA) Barnet London Borough Council [01-2000] Totteridge Green, Barnet, North London, Listed Grade 2. Unauthorised alterations were made to two windows in this listed house. The defendant, a celebrated TV doctor had replaced two dilapidated 1950s 1 metal frame windows in a three storey detached house with purpose made double glazed sashes in November 1998. Barnet LBC considered this had a most adverse effect on the listed building. The defendant argued that there had been a hotchpotch of windows when she moved in in 1988 and the two in question had been in a parlous state with gaps around the sills. Because of an early guilty plea the defendant was fined £2,000 for each window and costs of £850. (Source: The Press, Barnet). Barnet London Borough Council [01-2015] No.1 Wildwood Road, Barnet, North London Listed Grade 2. Unauthorised alterations were made to this house of 1912, to the designs of G. L. Sutcliffe, listed in 1996 and situated within the Hampstead Garden Suburb Conservation Area. One of a pair of houses making strongly asymmetrical compositions with scattered fenestration and features taken from the Vernacular Revival styles linked by a garden wall and garages, designed by G. L. Sutcliffe in 1912. The house is one of an excellent group Nos. 1-15 by Sutcliffe; all the houses being paired and designed to a restricted range of complementary plan forms. The owner Mr. Maurice Lawee bought the house for £3.7m in 2008 and in 2010 was granted Listed Building Consent for an extension to his basement, which included installing a lift, and a garage conversion. Complaints were received by the Hampstead Garden Suburb Trust that the owner was carrying out unauthorised work on the property and these were found to include the building of two large conservatories, removing inside walls, the original staircase and doors, and joining outside buildings into the main structure of the house. There were also complaints that the brickwork had been harmed. Conservation officers visited the site and required the works to cease, however notwithstanding repeated assurances by Mr. Lawee and his architect that they would stop, further visits showed the works had carried on regardless. Wildwood Road, Barnet before (left) and after (right) The solicitor from Barnet Council's shared legal practice, HB Public Law contended that “Irreversible damage has been caused to the brickwork and outhouse and original features appear to have been destroyed or removed from the building.” Mr. Lawee, pleaded guilty to four offences of carrying out unauthorised work to a listed building at Willesden Magistrates' Court in January 2015 in a prosecution brought by Barnet Council and was fined £45,000 and ordered to pay the council’s costs of £14,000. The owner subsequently applied for retrospective consent for the works, some of which were approved but others were refused. The architectural adviser for the Hampstead Garden Suburb Trust, David Davidson, remarked that: “The suburb is an area of international significance in the history of town planning and architecture, and alterations to its buildings need to be carefully considered in order to retain its special characteristics”. (Source: LPA) Braintree District Council [08-1990] Foxhearth Hall, The Street, Foxearth, Essex, Listed Grade 2*. Built in c.1300 the house had been the subject of few adaptations of modifications. In the 15th century the open aisled hall was floored to give 2 accommodation at first floor. Unusually the Hall also had an extra floor inserted to give an attic area accessed by an oak solid tread stair. The high quality of workmanship, extent of the surviving ancient timberwork and rare attic floor was responsible for the Grade 2* listing. Following complaints to the local planning authority from the previous owner, the local planning authority visited the building in August 1989 and the new owner was advised to stop work. A year-long investigation in conjunction with the Historic buildings Specialists at Essex County Council concluded with the owner Mr. Raymond Pluck pleaded guilty to 10 counts including removing the attic floor; the solid tread staircase and ancient timbers as well as the removal of partition walls and ceilings on the first floor; removal of the partition to the staircase enclosure in the hall; removal of wall linings and two fireplaces and removal of the front porch. The defendant who owned at least one other Listed building (on which unauthorised work had also been undertaken) was un-cooperative throughout and was a maximum (at that time) of £2,000 on each of eight counts and £1,000 on each of the remainder by Halstead Magistrates Court; totaling £18,000 with £5,158.60 costs. The defendant was given seven days to pay. (Source: LPA) Braintree District Council [10-2000] Hole Farm, Kelvedon, Listed Grade 2* The building was described by the person responsible for listing it, John McCann, as a remarkably unaltered specimen of a mediaeval hall house. The owner undertook The unauthorised replacement of windows; removal of an early staircase, cupboard and door; installation of a new staircase; removal of one fireplace and alteration of another, and cutting of a tie beam. The owner was found guilty on four counts and was fined £2,000 with £2,150 costs. There was some pre-trial plea- bargaining as a result of which some charges were dropped. The owner had also instructed the unauthorised shotblasting of soot-blackened timbers for which the contractor Aquablast Ltd was fined £1,000. Essex County Council remarked that although the owner would have to change all the windows, most of the damage could not be rectified. (Source: LPA) Brecon Beacons National Park Authority [08-2015] Llanwenarth House, Grade 2. Built in c.1532 in sandstone but remodeled in the 18th century, the seven bedroom manor house in the picturesque Usk valley was where Irish composer Cecil Alexander is thought to have written the lyrics where Irish composer Cecil Alexander wrote the lyrics to the hymn 'All Things Bright and Beautiful' with lines thought to have been inspired by the River Usk, which flows close to the property boundary. The building was listed in 1956. Property developer Mr. Kim Gregory Davies carried out £1million-worth of work and about sixty alterations without consent. After Davies had carried out the work, officials from the National Park Authority received an anonymous tip-off in 2009 that unlawful renovation work was being carried out. They visited and tried to gain access to the property several times but were refused entry by Davies, who locked the gates to keep them out. A warrant was issued and Council officers eventually managed to gain access in 2012 and discovered that substantial changes had been undertaken including the removal of 18th century Regency features and replacement with 'mock Tudor' interiors including replacing historic doors with modern 'Tudoresque' ones, taking up parquet flooring and laying down modern tiles in their place, removing historic timber windows and turning a bedroom into a bathroom, hard cement had been used for the renovation work instead of lime mortar. The defendant also installed a mosaic-clad spa bath, altered the coach house and courtyard taking up the old cobblestones replacing these with flagstones. The headstones of three children who had died more than 100 years ago - David, 4, Rosie, 3, and 11-month-old Thomas taken from the village of Llechryd, near Rhymney had been used as wall plaques for interior decoration.
Recommended publications
  • Transparency Report
    Transparency Report Transparency Report Government’s land and property disposals in 2015-16 and 2016-17 April 2018 1 Transparency Report 2 Transparency Report Transparency Report Government’s land and property disposals in 2015-16 and 2016-17 April 2018 3 Transparency Report © Crown copyright 2013 Produced by Cabinet Office You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or email: [email protected] Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Alternative format versions of this report are available on request from: [email protected] 4 Transparency Report Contents Introduction 7 Policy context 8 Land sales headlines 9 Details of assets sold 10 Appendix 1: Disposals guidance 82 Appendix 2: Transparency Review 82 Appendix 3: Glossary of terms 83 5 Transparency Report 6 Transparency Report Introduction The disposal of surplus government owned property is an important part of the Government’s drive to improve its estate management and create an efficient, fit-for-purpose and sustainable estate that meets future needs. This means disposing of surplus land and buildings in a way that delivers value for the taxpayer, boosts growth and delivers new homes. The Government has committed to freeing up land with capacity for at least 160,000 homes by 2020 and raising at least £5 billion from land and property disposals by 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • North Lincolnshire's Newcomers in 2019
    North Lincolnshire’s newcomers in 2019 A short statistics overview for people who plan or deliver services, and are planning for migrants who are the newest arrivals to North Lincolnshire. Photo credits: Steve Morgan [photographer] and Yorkshire Futures [source]. 1. Introduction Who is this briefing paper for? This document is aimed at people who plan or deliver local services in North Lincolnshire. You might find you are often the first people who meet and respond to newcomers in the local area. You will know that people who have just arrived in an area often need more information and support than those who have had time to adjust and learn about life in the UK. These newcomers might benefit from information about key services for example, in their first language. This briefing paper provides an overview of the numbers and geographical patterns of new migrants who recently have come to live in North Lincolnshire and were issued with a national insurance number [NINO] in 2019. We hope you will find the information presented here useful for planning services and engagement with new communities, making funding applications, or for background research for you or your colleagues to better understand migration in your area. Where has the data come from? This briefing paper was produced by Migration Yorkshire in September 2020. This document uses information from the Department for Work and Pensions [DWP] about non-British nationals who successfully applied for a NINO in 2019. We have used this as a proxy for newcomers, because new arrivals usually need to apply for a NINO in order to work or claim benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Licensed Organisations PDF Created: 29 09 2021
    PAF Licensing Centre PAF® Public Sector Licensees: List of licensed organisations PDF created: 29 09 2021 Licence no. Organisation names Application Confirmed PSL 05710 (Bucks) Nash Parish Council 22 | 10 | 2019 PSL 05419 (Shrop) Nash Parish Council 12 | 11 | 2019 PSL 05407 Ab Kettleby Parish Council 15 | 02 | 2018 PSL 05474 Abberley Parish Council 06 | 08 | 2018 PSL 01030 Abbey Hill Parish Council 02 | 04 | 2014 PSL 01031 Abbeydore & Bacton Group Parish Council 02 | 04 | 2014 PSL 01032 Abbots Langley Parish Council 02 | 04 | 2014 PSL 01033 Abbots Leigh Parish Council 02 | 04 | 2014 PSL 03449 Abbotskerswell Parish Council 23 | 04 | 2014 PSL 06255 Abbotts Ann Parish Council 06 | 07 | 2021 PSL 01034 Abdon & Heath Parish Council 02 | 04 | 2014 PSL 00040 Aberdeen City Council 03 | 04 | 2014 PSL 00029 Aberdeenshire Council 31 | 03 | 2014 PSL 01035 Aberford & District Parish Council 02 | 04 | 2014 PSL 01036 Abergele Town Council 17 | 10 | 2016 PSL 04909 Aberlemno Community Council 25 | 10 | 2016 PSL 04892 Abermule with llandyssil Community Council 11 | 10 | 2016 PSL 04315 Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board 24 | 02 | 2016 PSL 01037 Aberystwyth Town Council 17 | 10 | 2016 PSL 01038 Abingdon Town Council 17 | 10 | 2016 PSL 03548 Above Derwent Parish Council 20 | 03 | 2015 PSL 05197 Acaster Malbis Parish Council 23 | 10 | 2017 PSL 04423 Ackworth Parish Council 21 | 10 | 2015 PSL 01039 Acle Parish Council 02 | 04 | 2014 PSL 05515 Active Dorset 08 | 10 | 2018 PSL 05067 Active Essex 12 | 05 | 2017 PSL 05071 Active Lincolnshire 12 | 05
    [Show full text]
  • TRADES. [Ll.NCOLNSHIRE
    836 SOH TRADES. [Ll.NCOLNSHIRE. SCHOOLS & COLLIWES-continued. I!Robson MissKa.te;nMonks rd.Lincln Pearson Bros. (branch of British Oil Sleaford & Kesteven High School for §Sage Miss Bertha, Goxhill & Cake Mills Limited), Corn ex­ fTirls Limited (Ernest H. Godson, ~St. J oseph's Convent Boarding change, Lincoln l!ec. ; Miss Frances Kirk B.A.. School (Sister Augusta, lady Simpson, Williams & Co. East road, head mistTess), 62 Southga.te, superior), Up. Lindum st. Lincoln Sleaford SleafOTd ~St. Paul's College (Mrs. Jinnie Sowerby & Co. Ltd. River head, Vic­ Sleaford School of Art (Henry J. McNamee, proprietress), Temple toria street, Grimsby & Corn ex­ Pocock, master), Duke st. Sleaford Belwood, Bracon, Doncaster changes: Alford; Boston; Brigg; Spalding Grammar School (Ernest t 11 Sawyer Miss L. A. Conings by, Lncln Grantham ; Horncastle; Lincoln; Charles Chappell M.A.., LL.D. i§Seacroft School (Henry Edward Louth; Sleaford; Spalding; Spilsby F.R.G.S. head master; E. V. Sparrow M.A.Cantab. principal), & Stamford Spicer, L. J. Driver B.A.. & A.. J. Seacroft, S~egness Potter F.R.G.S. assistant masters), ~Shelton Miss E. 2 Northolme, Priory road, Spalding Gains borough SEED GROWERS. l[tShepherd John Richard, Wainfieet Spilsby Grammar School (Rev. Geo. Banks Harry Smith (potato, turnip Lindley B.A.. head master), Church road, Skegness litStocks Mrs. EJaroline H. Messing- & mustard), Rectory farm, Tydd street, Spilsby St. Marv, Wisbech ham, Gainsborough · • Stamford High School for Girls (Miss Barker & Son, Frampton, Kirton,Bostn M. Sunderland - Taylor M.A..Dub. lltStothert Miss, Boston High school, Wide Bargate, Boston Barnard J. & Son, Kinnard house, head mistress), 27 to 30 High st.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Ideologies, Racism, Discourse: Debates on Immigration and Ethnic Issues
    5 Ideologies, Racism, Discourse: Debates on Immigration and Ethnic Issues TEUN A. VAN DIJK Aims This paper studies some of the ideological properties of political discourse on immigration and minorities in contemporary Europe. It combines results of my current work on the theory of ideology (Van Dijk, 1998a) with those of an earlier large project on the discursive reproduction of racism (Van Dijk, 1984, 1987, 1991, 1993a). More specifically, the framework of this discussion is an international project, directed by Ruth Wodak1 and myself, which examines and compares the way leading politicians in seven EU countries speak and write about immigration and ethnic issues. Although there are obvious contextual differences between immigration, race relations, and hence between talk about these issues in the various countries, the overall theoretical framework for their analysis is essentially the same. This framework, which will only be briefly summarised here, combines elements from the following multidisciplinary triangle: (a) an elite theory of racism as a form of ethnic dominance and inequality, (b) a socio-cognitive approach to (racist, nationalist) ideologies and other social representations, and (c) a complex multi-level analysis of text and talk in context, in general, and of parliamentary debates, in particular. Thus, although file examples analysed in this paper are taken from a debate in the British House of Commons oil asylum seekers, it is assumed that many of the properties of this debate may also be found in immigration debates in other western European countries. Earlier analyses and comparisons of debates on immigration and ethnic issues in Western Europe shows that there are differences of style (e.g., in the UK, France and Germany, MPs may interrupt, heckle and shout, which is much less the case in Spain and the Netherlands), and of nationalist rhetoric (especially in France), but that the main topics, argumentation strategies and especially the standard arguments (topoi) against immigration are very much comparable (Van Dijk, 1993a).
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Hull the Early Career of Thomas
    THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL THE EARLY CAREER OF THOMAS, LORD HOWARD, EARL OF SURREY AND THIRD DUKE OF NORFOLK, 1474—c. 1525 being a Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Hull by Susan Elisabeth Vokes, B.A. September, 1988 Acknowledgements I should like to thank the University of Hull for my postgraduate scholarship, and the Institute of Historical Research and Eliot College, the Universiy of Kent, for providing excellent facilities in recent years. I am especially grateful to the Duke of Norfolk and his archivists for giving me access to material in his possession. The staff of many other archives and libraries have been extremely helpful in answering detailed enquiries and helping me to locate documents, and / regret that it is not possible to acknowledge them individually. I am grateful to my supervisor, Peter Heath, for his patience, understanding and willingness to read endless drafts over the years in which this study has evolved. Others, too, have contributed much. Members of the Russell/Starkey seminar group at the Institute of Historical Research, and the Late Medieval seminar group at the University of Kent made helpful comments on a paper, and I have benefitted from suggestions, discussion, references and encouragement from many others, particularly: Neil Samman, Maria Dowling, Peter Gwynn, George Bernard, Greg Walker and Diarmaid MacCulloch. I am particularly grateful to several people who took the trouble to read and comment on drafts of various chapters. Margaret Condon and Anne Crawford commented on a draft of the first chapter, Carole Rawcliffe and Linda Clerk on my analysis of Norfolk's estate accounts, Steven Ellis on my chapters on Surrey in Ireland and in the north of England, and Roger Virgoe on much of the thesis, including all the East Anglian material.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject Indexes
    Subject Indexes. p.4: Accession Day celebrations (November 17). p.14: Accession Day: London and county index. p.17: Accidents. p.18: Accounts and account-books. p.20: Alchemists and alchemy. p.21: Almoners. p.22: Alms-giving, Maundy, Alms-houses. p.25: Animals. p.26: Apothecaries. p.27: Apparel: general. p.32: Apparel, Statutes of. p.32: Archery. p.33: Architecture, building. p.34: Armada; other attempted invasions, Scottish Border incursions. p.37: Armour and armourers. p.38: Astrology, prophecies, prophets. p.39: Banqueting-houses. p.40: Barges and Watermen. p.42: Battles. p.43: Birds, and Hawking. p.44: Birthday of Queen (Sept 7): celebrations; London and county index. p.46: Calendar. p.46: Calligraphy and Characterie (shorthand). p.47: Carts, carters, cart-takers. p.48: Catholics: selected references. p.50: Census. p.51: Chapel Royal. p.53: Children. p.55: Churches and cathedrals visited by Queen. p.56: Church furnishings; church monuments. p.59: Churchwardens’ accounts: chronological list. p.72: Churchwardens’ accounts: London and county index. Ciphers: see Secret messages, and ciphers. p.76: City and town accounts. p.79: Clergy: selected references. p.81: Clergy: sermons index. p.88: Climate and natural phenomena. p.90: Coats of arms. p.92: Coinage and coins. p.92: Cooks and kitchens. p.93: Coronation. p.94: Court ceremonial and festivities. p.96: Court disputes. p.98: Crime. p.101: Customs, customs officers. p.102: Disease, illness, accidents, of the Queen. p.105: Disease and illness: general. p.108: Disease: Plague. p.110: Disease: Smallpox. p.110: Duels and Challenges to Duels.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review 2020 – 2021 Delightful Ethical Digital
    ANNUAL REVIEW2020 - 2021 For people who love church buildings Annual Review 2020 – 2021 Delightful Ethical Digital We’re proud to have supported the National Churches Trust since 2010. They’reThe Trust just is justtwo ofone the of amazing the many charitiesamazing charitieswe help to we increase help to theirincrease online their impact online withimpact stunning with stunning websites websites and beautiful and beautiful brands. brands. We understandWe understand fixed fixed budgets, budgets, tight tight deadlines deadlines and and the the fatbeehive.com importanceimportance of good humour! Get inin touchtouch toto seesee howhow [email protected] we can help you. +44 (0)20 7739 8704 In partnership with In partnership with The NCT group whose work is described in this report includes NCT Heritage Services Limited (a wholly–owned subsidiary) and the Luke Trust (a separate charity managed by The NCT). Cover photos: Front cover photographs (left to right clockwise): St Boniface church, Bunbury © Revd Hayward, celebrating the completion of work to restore the two east towers of All Saints in Hove © Peter Millar, Huw Edwards playing the organ at Holy Trinity Church, Clapham Common, London © Huw Edwards and Saul Church, Downpatrick © TourismNI Fat Editor:Beehive-NCT-A4-ad-2020.indd Eddie Tulasiewicz [email protected] 1 Design: GADS 13/07/2021 17:33 The opinions expressed in the Annual Review do not necessarily reflect those of The National Churches Trust but remain solely those of the authors. All material published in The National Churches Trust Annual Review is the intellectual property of either The National Churches Trust or our authors and is protected by international copyright law.
    [Show full text]
  • County Index, Hosts' Index, and Proposed Progresses
    County Index of Visits by the Queen. Hosts’ Index: p.56. Proposed Progresses: p.68. Alleged and Traditional Visits: p.101. Mistaken visits: chronological list: p.103-106. County Index of Visits by the Queen. ‘Proposed progresses’: the section following this Index and Hosts’ Index. Other references are to the main Text. Counties are as they were in Elizabeth’s reign, disregarding later changes. (Knighted): knighted during the Queen’s visit. Proposed visits are in italics. Bedfordshire. Bletsoe: 1566 July 17/20: proposed: Oliver 1st Lord St John. 1578: ‘Proposed progresses’ (letter): Lord St John. Dunstable: 1562: ‘Proposed progresses’. At The Red Lion; owned by Edward Wyngate; inn-keeper Richard Amias: 1568 Aug 9-10; 1572 July 28-29. Eaton Socon, at Bushmead: 1566 July 17/20: proposed: William Gery. Holcot: 1575 June 16/17: dinner: Richard Chernock. Houghton Conquest, at Dame Ellensbury Park (royal): 1570 Aug 21/24: dinner, hunt. Luton: 1575 June 15: dinner: George Rotherham. Northill, via: 1566 July 16. Ridgmont, at Segenhoe: visits to Peter Grey. 1570 Aug 21/24: dinner, hunt. 1575 June 16/17: dinner. Toddington: visits to Henry Cheney. 1564 Sept 4-7 (knighted). 1570 Aug 16-25: now Sir Henry Cheney. (Became Lord Cheney in 1572). 1575 June 15-17: now Lord Cheney. Willington: 1566 July 16-20: John Gostwick. Woburn: owned by Francis Russell, 2nd Earl of Bedford. 1568: ‘Proposed progresses’. 1572 July 29-Aug 1. 1 Berkshire. Aldermaston: 1568 Sept 13-14: William Forster; died 1574. 1572: ‘Proposed progresses’. Visits to Humphrey Forster (son); died 1605. 1592 Aug 19-23 (knighted).
    [Show full text]
  • Corbould Bracon Lodge
    SECTION XIII. CORBOULD BRACON LODGE. ' JOHNCORBOULD (see Section XII) of 8; Dove Lane, Norwich (1783), p. of St. Peter Mancroft (1768-80) and St. Gregory (1786-94), one of the City Fathers of Norwich (admitted to the Freedom of the City 4 July 1789), gentleman and mer- chant, partner in the firm of Corbould and Wilmot, 7, Dove Lane, Nonvich, b. at Brooke, 1720, bapt. at Brooke 20 June 1720, purchased Bracon Lodge, Bracon Ash, Norwich, 8 Aug. 176j, enIarged it in 1798 and there erected a serpentine kitchen-garden wall. Retired from business c. 1788, with a considerable fortune and went to reside at 65, St. Giles Street, Norwich. Died 8 June 1801 aged 81 and was buried in the chancel of Bracon Ash Church. He made a wise distri- bution of part of his fortune during his lifetime. His will is dated 30 May 1801, proved P.C.C. 10th Oct. 1801, Jno. Corbould jnr., and William Foster, gent., of Norwich, executors, witnessed by William Forster, S. Hatfield and Wm. Whittred, pr. at under L~o,ooo. By this will he left L4,j 5 o to his dau. Ann, LIOOto P. W. Longdill, Ej each to all nephews and nieces, all real estate to his son John. He married c. I 765, ANN(aged 20), d. 27 Nov. I 791, aged j 6, bur. in the chancel of Bracon Ash Church, dau. of . MILLER,of Bracon Ash, and had issue :- I. ANN CORBOULD,b. 1766, d. unm. 31 Jan. 1843 at St. George TombIand, Norwich, aet 77, and was bur.
    [Show full text]
  • Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse Linked to Westminster: Investigation Report
    Allegations child sexual of abuse Westminster to linked Allegations of child sexual abuse linked to Westminster Investigation Report Investigation Investigation Report February 2020 February 2020 2020 Allegations of child sexual abuse linked to Westminster Investigation Report February 2020 A report of the Inquiry Panel Professor Alexis Jay OBE Professor Sir Malcolm Evans KCMG OBE Ivor Frank Drusilla Sharpling CBE © Crown copyright 2020 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the document title specified. Where third‑party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] or Freepost IICSA INDEPENDENT INQUIRY. This publication is available at https://www.iicsa.org.uk/reports CCS1219768174 02/20 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled‑fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. The following corrections were made to this version of the report on 29 May 2020: Page vii, paragraph 3: was amended to read ‘hand over the same documents’. Page 159 in Annex 1: profession removed, amended to read David Ford Campbell-Chalmers Contents Executive Summary v Part A: Introduction 1 A.1: Background
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTION 2015 ALSO in THIS Poll of Polls Result EDITION
    ME ER M M B E R R O S F H S O N U S O E M Order! Order! OF COM The Official Journal of the Association of Former Members of Parliament WINTER 2015 ELECTION 2015 ALSO IN THIS Poll of Polls Result EDITION... 6 7 MAY MAY ELIZABETH PEACOCK 2 A Word From Our New Chairman 36.9% 34% 33% 30.4% JOAN WALLEY 5 Parliament Goes On LAWRIE QUINN 10 HS2: A High Speed CON LAB CON LAB Future? POLLS & PARTY PREDICTIONS WHAT WENT WRONG? PETER HAIN 13 Can Sport and An analysis from Robert, Lord Hayward p.8 Politics be Divorced? Order! Order! Winter 2015 FROM THE CHAIRMAN Our new Executive Committee is now up and running. Our newly elected Chairman, Elizabeth Peacock writes: T IS A GREAT HONOUR to be elected Chairman of Our Association has a clearly defined role to make the Association of Former Members of Parliament which the wide ranging experience gained by Members of has a growing importance on the Westminster scene. I Parliament during their active years available to the I thank all those who put themselves forward for election government of the day and the nation. and for the interest of those who supported the Association with their votes. This support confirms the vibrant state of the Association which, in addition, to its basic role of the Executive in the recent ballot. I also welcome those who representing the interests of our members is developing a have now been co-opted, Gordon Banks, Nicholas Bennett, useful service to Parliament.
    [Show full text]