DOCSLIB.ORG

Midterm Evaluation of Gorkha Recovery and Resilience Project in Gorkha District Supported by Catholic Relief Services Nepal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Midterm Evaluation of Gorkha Recovery and Resilience Project in Gorkha District Supported by Catholic Relief Services Nepal Midterm Evaluation of Gorkha Recovery and Resilience Project in Gorkha District Supported by Catholic Relief Services Nepal [Final Report] Social Welfare Council, Government of Nepal, Kathmandu Prof. Narbikram Thapa, PhD, Program Expert: Team Leader Mr. Shiva Kumar Basnet, Rep. from SWC, Acting Director: Team Member Er. Devi Prasad Pandey, Rep. from NRA, Engineer: Team Member CA Mr. Sujan Kumar Kafle, Financial Expert: Team Member 7/20/2018 Acknowledgement The Gorkha Recovery and Resilience Project midterm evaluation team is grateful to Social Welfare Council (SWC) to entrusting us to carry out the study. We would like to express sincere gratitude to Mr. Dilli Prasad Bhatta- Member Secretary of SWC, Government of Nepal, Mrs. Bhagawati Sangraula – Acting Director and Mr. Dipendra Pant - Deputy Director of Monitoring & Evaluation Department, Mr. Mohan Rayamajhi-Assistant Director of Monitoring and Evaluation Division, SWC for fruitful comments and suggestions in the report after the presentation. Similarly, Ms. Katherine Price - Country Representative - CRS Nepal, Mr. Adeel Javaid – Program Manager, CRS Nepal, Mr. Ram Hari Devkota-GRR District Coordinator, Er. Abhishek Shrestha- Senior Project Coordinator; Mr. Prachanda Kattel - Livelihood Coordinator; Er. Rakesh Tuladhar- Cash for Work Coordinator of GRRP and other project staff of GRRP for the cooperation during the whole midterm evaluation fieldwork and constructive comments and suggestions after the presentation of the report in SWC Office, Lainchaur, Kathmandu. We would also like to thank the officials of CRS Nepal and partners-SSICDC, SDSC- Gorkha and CN (Caritas Nepal) who were supportive as always tirelessly for the successful completion of the midterm evaluation process. The study team would like to express heartfelt thanks to all stakeholders particularly the staff members of Drinking Water and Sanitation Division Office, District Agriculture Development Office, District Livestock Service Office, Gorkha, and District National Reconstruction Authority, Gorkha, civil society organizations, women farmers' groups, community- based organizations, local level Government - Rural Municipalities and Municipalities, private sector etc who have made the contributions to make the study enriched. CRS Nepal is acknowledged for the photos presented in the cover page of the midterm evaluation report. Last but not the least; we would like to thank all the respondents without whom this midterm evaluation would not have been possible for sparing their valuable time and providing information to us for the completion of the midterm evaluation study. Midterm Evaluation Team Kathmandu, Nepal 20 July, 2018 2 | P a g e Table of Contents Acknowledgement .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 List of Figures .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 List of Boxes… ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 List of Tables ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………5 List of Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Executive Summary.................................................................................................................................................... 7-13 1. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………14-20 1.1 Projects Background ............................................................................................................................................. 14 1.2 Intended Outcomes of the Programs .................................................................................................................... 14 1.3 Intended Beneficiaries of the Project ................................................................................................................... 14 1.4 Donor Information ................................................................................................................................................ 14 1.5 Project Composition .............................................................................................................................................. 16 1.6 Financing Arrangements ....................................................................................................................................... 17 1.7 Objectives of the midterm evaluation .................................................................................................................. 17 1.8 Scope of the midterm evaluation.......................................................................................................................... 17 1.9 Midterm Evaluation Research Questions .............................................................................................................. 18 1.10 Midterm evaluation team composition .............................................................................................................. 18 1.11 Organization of the study report ........................................................................................................................ 18 2. METHODOLOGY OF MIDTERM EVALUATION……………………………………………………………………………………. 21-24 2.1 Design of the Study ............................................................................................................................................... 19 2.2 Approaches to the Study ....................................................................................................................................... 19 2.3 Selection of the Participants ................................................................................................................................. 19 2.4 Source of Data ....................................................................................................................................................... 19 2.5 Methods of Data Collection .................................................................................................................................. 20 2.5.1 Review of Project Documents .................................................................................................................. 20 2.5.2 Semi-structured Interviews ...................................................................................................................... 20 2.5.3 Focus Group Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 20 2.5.4 Case Studies ............................................................................................................................................. 20 2.5.5 Key Informant Interview .......................................................................................................................... 20 2.5.6 Organizational Assessment ...................................................................................................................... 20 2.5.7 People's Perception Mapping .................................................................................................................. 20 2.5.8 Score Ranking ........................................................................................................................................... 20 2.5.9 Participant’s Observation ......................................................................................................................... 21 2.5.10 Before and After Situation Mapping ...................................................................................................... 21 2.6 Analysis of Data ..................................................................................................................................................... 21 2.7 Work Schedules of the Study ................................................................................................................................ 21 2.8 Limitation of the Study .......................................................................................................................................... 21 3. MIDTERM EVALUATION FINDINGS………………………………………………………………………………………………………..25-51 3.1 Effectiveness and Impact ...................................................................................................................................... 22 3.1.1 Happiness Mapping……………………………………………………………………………………………………………22 3.1.2 Score Ranking of Major Project components………………………………………………………………………23 3.1.3 Before and After Situation mapping of ………………………………………………………………………….25 3.2.Sustainability …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..28 3.2.1 Impact of Shelter in the ommunity………………………………………………………………………………….29 3.2.2 Impact of WASH in the community 3.2.2 Imapct of Livelihoods in the Community …………………………………………………31 3.2.3 Technical Sustainability ........................................................................................................................... 34 3.2.4 Financial Sustainability ............................................................................................................................. 34 3. 3 Efficiency ...................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sustainable Tourism Enhancement in Nepal's Protected Areas Public Disclosure Authorized
    Sustainable Tourism Enhancement in Nepal's Protected Areas Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental and Social Management Framework Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized National Trust for Nature Conservation GPO Box 3712, Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal May 2020 Executive Summary 1. Description of the Project: Tourism is one of the major contributors to the sustainable economy of Nepal. The direct contribution of the tourism sector in the national GDP was at 4% in 2017 and is forecasted to rise by 3.8% per annum to reach 4.2% in 2028 (World Travel and Tourism Council, 2018). Despite tremendous growth potential in tourism sector, Nepal stands as a low-cost tourist destination with much lower daily tourist spending than the regional average. This is a high time for Nepal to think about and harness high value nature-based tourism. Nature based tourism is a key driver of Nepal's tourism, providing the sector both comparative and competitive advantages in the unique setting of rich topographic, biological and cultural diversity. In this context, the World Bank is supporting GoN to implement the project entitled “Sustainable Tourism Enhancement in Nepal’s Protected Areas (STENPA)". Project Destinations: The project focuses on areas with Nature-Based Tourism (NBT) potential with the aim of piloting a sustainable tourism approach that can be replicated across Nepal’s protected areas (PAs). The project destinations include PA at their core, nearby gateway cities and surrounding areas with NBT potential, and has identified six PAs as the initial project destinations (Bardia, Banke Shukla Phanta and Rara National Parks, and their buffer zones; and Annapurna and Manaslu conservation Areas).
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Earthquake District Profile - Gorkha OSOCC Assessment Cell 09.05.2015
    Nepal Earthquake District Profile - Gorkha OSOCC Assessment Cell 09.05.2015 This report is produced by the OSOCC Assessment Cell based on secondary data from multiple sources, including the Government of Nepal, UNDAC, United Nations Agencies, non-governmental organisation and media sources. I. Situation Overview Gorkha, with a population of more than 271,000, is one of the worst-affected districts.1 The epicenter of the earthquake was in Brapok, 15km from Gorkha town. As of 6 May, 412 people have been reported killed and 1,034 injured. In the southern part of the district, food has been provided, but field observations indicate that the food supplied might not be enough for the actual population in the area. Several VDCs in the mountainous areas of Gorkha are yet to be reached by humanitarian assistance. There are no roads in these northern areas, only footpaths. The level of destruction within the district and even within VDCs varies widely, as does the availability of food. A humanitarian hub has been set up at the Chief District Officer’s (CDO) premises in Gorkha town. Reported number of people in need (multiple sources) The figures featured in this map have been collected via multiple sources (district authorities, Red Cross, local NGO, media). Where multiple figures for the same location have been reported the highest one was taken. These figures are indicative and do not represent the overall number of people in need. 1 This is an updated version of the Gorkha District Profile that was published by ACAPS on 1 May 2015. As with other mountain areas of Nepal, Gorkha contains popular locations for foreign trekkers.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • CARE Nepal Save the Children UNDP World Vision International
    Volume III Recovery & Reconstruction Quarterly Bulletin| Gorkha September 2016 Volume III Asal Chhimekee Nepal UN Women WHO International Nepal Fellowship International Medical Corps Good Neighbors International Sajhedari Bikaas People In Need HRRP ECO- Nepal Updates United Vision Nepal Nepal Red Cross Society Oxfam Suaahara Catholic Relief Services UNICEF CARE Nepal Save the Children UNDP World Vision International Recovery & Reconstruction Quarterly Bulletin| Gorkha September 2016 Volume III July – September, 2016 Working VDC's: Shreenathkot, Aappipal, Ghairung, Bhumlichowk and Ghyalchowk, Gorkha Asal Chimekee Nepal is an organization which was registered as NGO in 2059 and was started by Pokhara Christian Community Kaski. It works in coordination with DDRC, related district government offices, like minded organizations, local communities and churches in Gorkha. The organization has been focusing on rehabilitation, reconstruction, livelihood & health support, disaster preparedness and strengthening local community together with the government bodies and local community. Some of the specific works of this organization are as follows: 1: Reconstructions of Health Post Buildings in Aappipal, Ghairung, Bhumlichowk & Ghyalchowk Except Aappipal healthpost, other health post reconstruction works has been completed and in the process on handover program to the local community within the 1st week of October, 2016 with necessary equipments and furnishing. The representatives of MoHP & DHO were also involved during the process of reconstruction. From the expert side, the technical consultant visited to healthpost construction site for monitoring and supervision of the constructional work. 2: Reconstruction of VDC building Shreentahkot VDC building reconstructions work has been started from 5th of Asoj, 2073. The reconstruction work was started formally by doing laystone foundation of the VDC building.
    [Show full text]
  • VBST Short List
    1 आिेदकको दर्ा ा न륍बर नागररकर्ा न륍बर नाम थायी जि쥍ला गा.वि.स. बािुको नाम ईभेꅍट ID 10002 2632 SUMAN BHATTARAI KATHMANDU KATHMANDU M.N.P. KEDAR PRASAD BHATTARAI 136880 10003 28733 KABIN PRAJAPATI BHAKTAPUR BHAKTAPUR N.P. SITA RAM PRAJAPATI 136882 10008 271060/7240/5583 SUDESH MANANDHAR KATHMANDU KATHMANDU M.N.P. SHREE KRISHNA MANANDHAR 136890 10011 9135 SAMERRR NAKARMI KATHMANDU KATHMANDU M.N.P. BASANTA KUMAR NAKARMI 136943 10014 407/11592 NANI MAYA BASNET DOLAKHA BHIMESWOR N.P. SHREE YAGA BAHADUR BASNET136951 10015 62032/450 USHA ADHIJARI KAVRE PANCHKHAL BHOLA NATH ADHIKARI 136952 10017 411001/71853 MANASH THAPA GULMI TAMGHAS KASHER BAHADUR THAPA 136954 10018 44874 RAJ KUMAR LAMICHHANE PARBAT TILAHAR KRISHNA BAHADUR LAMICHHANE136957 10021 711034/173 KESHAB RAJ BHATTA BAJHANG BANJH JANAK LAL BHATTA 136964 10023 1581 MANDEEP SHRESTHA SIRAHA SIRAHA N.P. KUMAR MAN SHRESTHA 136969 2 आिेदकको दर्ा ा न륍बर नागररकर्ा न륍बर नाम थायी जि쥍ला गा.वि.स. बािुको नाम ईभेꅍट ID 10024 283027/3 SHREE KRISHNA GHARTI LALITPUR GODAWARI DURGA BAHADUR GHARTI 136971 10025 60-01-71-00189 CHANDRA KAMI JUMLA PATARASI JAYA LAL KAMI 136974 10026 151086/205 PRABIN YADAV DHANUSHA MARCHAIJHITAKAIYA JAYA NARAYAN YADAV 136976 10030 1012/81328 SABINA NAGARKOTI KATHMANDU DAANCHHI HARI KRISHNA NAGARKOTI 136984 10032 1039/16713 BIRENDRA PRASAD GUPTABARA KARAIYA SAMBHU SHA KANU 136988 10033 28-01-71-05846 SURESH JOSHI LALITPUR LALITPUR U.M.N.P. RAJU JOSHI 136990 10034 331071/6889 BIJAYA PRASAD YADAV BARA RAUWAHI RAM YAKWAL PRASAD YADAV 136993 10036 071024/932 DIPENDRA BHUJEL DHANKUTA TANKHUWA LOCHAN BAHADUR BHUJEL 136996 10037 28-01-067-01720 SABIN K.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Gorkha District Assessment Form
    Nepal Gorkha District Assessment Form IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION I2 DATE OF ASSESSMENT * I3 ENUMERATOR NAME * yyyy­mm­dd I4 DISTRICT * I5 VDC/MUNICIPALITY * I5 VDC/MUNICIPALITY * Please specify Gorkha Bihi Chhaikampar Chumchet Lho Prok Samagaun Sirdibas Uhya Other (specify) I6 WARD * I7 VILLAGE NAME * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Do not know I8 GPS COORDINATES GPS coordinates can only be collected when outside. latitude (x.y °) longitude (x.y °) altitude (m) accuracy (m) I9 SOURCE(S) FOR THIS ASSESSMENT None 1 2 3 or more Select the number of people you spoke to for each category . * Official (administrative) . * Village representative . * Religious leader . * Army or police . * Health worker . * Social worker . * International NGO / development partner . * Teacher . * Other local person I10 HOW MANY OF THOSE KEY INFORMANTS WERE WOMEN? * COMMUNITY PROFILE » Total population P1 ENTER THE PERCENTAGE OF THE OVERALL POPULATION WHO ARE IN THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES. Needs to add up to 100% * * * % in normal situation % requiring assistance % requiring immediate assistance » Male P2 ENTER THE PERCENTAGE OF THE MALE POPULATION WHO ARE IN THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES. Needs to add up to 100% * * * % in normal situation % requiring assistance % requiring immediate assistance » Female P3 ENTER THE PERCENTAGE OF THE FEMALE POPULATION WHO ARE IN THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES. Needs to add up to 100% * * * % in normal situation % requiring assistance % requiring immediate assistance » Children P4 ENTER THE PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN WHO ARE IN THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES. Needs
    [Show full text]
  • NEPAL: Gorkha - Operational Presence Map [As of 14 July 2015]
    NEPAL: Gorkha - Operational Presence Map [as of 14 July 2015] 60 Samagaun Partners working in Gorkha Chhekampar 1-10 11-15 16-20 21-25 26-35 Lho Bihi Prok Chunchet Partners working in Nepal Sirdibas Health 26 Keroja Shelter and NFI Uhiya 23 Ghyachok Laprak WASH 18 Kharibot Warpak Gumda Kashigaun Protection 13 Lapu HansapurSimjung Muchchok Manbu Kerabari Sairpani Thumo Early Recovery 6 Jaubari Swara Thalajung Aaruaarbad Harmi ShrithankotTar k u k ot Amppipal ArupokhariAruchanaute Education 5 Palungtar Chhoprak Masel Tandrang Khoplang Tap le Gaikhur Dhawa Virkot PhinamAsrang Nutrition 1 Chyangling Borlang Bungkot Prithbinarayan Municipality Namjung DhuwakotDeurali Bakrang GhairungTan gli ch ok Tak lu ng Phujel Manakamana Makaising Darbung Mumlichok Ghyalchok IMPLEMENTING PARTNERS BY CLUSTER Early Recovery Education Health 6 partners 5 partners 26 partners Nb of Nb of Nb of organisations organisations organisations 1 >=5 1 >=5 1 >=5 Nutrition Protection Shelter and NFI 1 partners 13 partners 23 partners Nb of Nb of Nb of organisations organisations organisations 1 >=5 1 >=5 1 >=5 WASH 18 partners Want to find out the latest 3W products and other info on Nepal Earthquake response? visit the Humanitarian Response website at http:www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/op Nb of Note: organisations Implementing partners represent the organization on the ground, erations/nepal in the affected district doing operational work, such as send feedback to 1 >=5 distributing food, tents, water purification kits etc. [email protected] Creation date:23 July 2015 Glide number: EQ-2015-000048-NPL Sources: Cluster reporting The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Uf]/Vf K'gm;J]{If0f Ug'{Kg]{ Nfeu|Fxl Ljj/0F
    g]kfn ;/sf/ ;+3Lo dfldnf tyf :yfgLo ljsf; dGqfno s]Gb|Lo cfof]hgf sfof{Gjog OsfO{ e"sDkLo cfjf; k'glg{df{0f cfof]hgf Hjfun, nlntk'/ uf]/vf k'gM;j]{If0f ug'{kg]{ nfeu|fxL ljj/0f . S.N G_ID RV/RS Grievant Name District VDC/MUN (P) Ward(P) Tole GP/NP WARD Slip No Remarks 1 281924 RS Nettra Bahadur Thap Gorkha Aanppipal 1 bajredanda Palungtar 3 21350 2 290180 RS Sabitri Devi Bhattrai Gorkha Aanppipal 1 bajredanda Palungtar 3 212331 3 288425 RS Jit Bahadur Rana Magar Gorkha Aanppipal 1 jal jala Palungtar 3 4 290553 RS Dhan Bahadur Rana Gorkha Aanppipal 1 judi thumka Palungtar 3 5 290114 RS Rithe Sarki Gorkha Aanppipal 1 pathivara Palungtar 3 6 288914 RS Tulka Sarki Gorkha Aanppipal 1 pathivara Palungtar 3 7 288959 RS Arjun Baniya Gorkha Aanppipal 1 pathivara Palungtar 3 8 290178 RS Sanak Bahadur Bhattrai Gorkha Aanppipal 1 pathivara Palungtar 3 9 290030 RS Jibarayal Miya Gorkha Aanppipal 2 dumre danda Palungtar 3 10 290560 RS Gurungseni Sunar Gorkha Aanppipal 2 maibal Palungtar 3 215317 11 290034 RS Damar Kumari Thapa Gorkha Aanppipal 2 maibal Palungtar 3 12 288925 RS Amar Bahadur Kuwar Gorkha Aanppipal 2 pachchyan Palungtar 3 13 290556 RS Rajendra Dhakal Gorkha Aanppipal 2 raute pani Palungtar 3 215570 14 286299 RS Sarala Devkota Gorkha Aanppipal 2 raute pani Palungtar 3 423666 15 288462 RS Bijaya Raj Devkota Gorkha Aanppipal 2 raute pani Palungtar 3 16 288920 RS Shree Niwas Devkota Gorkha Aanppipal 2 raute pani Palungtar 3 17 290055 RS Uttam Kumar Shtestha Gorkha Aanppipal 2 raute pani Palungtar 3 18 290047 RS Brendra Devkota Gorkha Aanppipal
    [Show full text]
  • Gorkha District - Fsps, Market Functioning and Road Access
    Nepal Earthquake Response Cash Coordination Group GIS Mapping, June, 2015 GIS INFO Sheet: Gorkha District - FSPs, Market Functioning and Road Access A) INFO Sheet: Gorkha District - Summary Status, 30 June 2015: 1. Aru Chanaute VDC: Ten financial service providing institutions (class A, B, D and remittance companies) No Market functioning and Damaged Road Access but passable by 4 x 4 small vehicles 2. Thumi VDC: Only one financial service providing institutions(Remittance company) Partial Market functioning and Damaged Road Access but passable by 4 x 4 small vehicles 3. Prithvi Narayan (Gorkha) Municipality: Twenty-two financial service providing institutions (All types) Full Market functioning and Damaged Road Access but passable by 4 x 4 small vehicles 4. Simjung VDC: NO financial service providing institution Full Market functioning and Damaged Road Access but passable by 4 x 4 small vehicles Road Accessibility Status, FSPs and Market Status (CTP will be added once data is finalized and integrated in GIS ) VDCs with Damaged road but passable by 4x4 small vehicles (as of 25 June, 2015), No of FSPs and Market Status (May-June, 2015) SNo VDC/Municipality Type of FSPs Market Status Class_A Class_B Class_C Class_D Remittance Total 1 Aruchanaute 3 2 0 1 4 10 Not functioning 2 Prithbi Narayan 6 5 0 4 7 22 Functioning Municipality 3 Thum i 0 0 0 0 1 1 Partially functioning 4 Simjung 0 0 0 0 0 0 Functioning 1 Nepal Earthquake Response Cash Coordination Group GIS Mapping, June, 2015 B) INFO Sheet: Gorkha District - Details: 1. Location Map - Financial Service Providers 2 Nepal Earthquake Response Cash Coordination Group GIS Mapping, June, 2015 2.
    [Show full text]
  • TSLC PMT Result
    Page 62 of 132 Rank Token No SLC/SEE Reg No Name District Palika WardNo Father Mother Village PMTScore Gender TSLC 1 42060 7574O15075 SOBHA BOHARA BOHARA Darchula Rithachaupata 3 HARI SINGH BOHARA BIMA BOHARA AMKUR 890.1 Female 2 39231 7569013048 Sanju Singh Bajura Gotree 9 Gyanendra Singh Jansara Singh Manikanda 902.7 Male 3 40574 7559004049 LOGAJAN BHANDARI Humla ShreeNagar 1 Hari Bhandari Amani Bhandari Bhandari gau 907 Male 4 40374 6560016016 DHANRAJ TAMATA Mugu Dhainakot 8 Bali Tamata Puni kala Tamata Dalitbada 908.2 Male 5 36515 7569004014 BHUVAN BAHADUR BK Bajura Martadi 3 Karna bahadur bk Dhauli lawar Chaurata 908.5 Male 6 43877 6960005019 NANDA SINGH B K Mugu Kotdanda 9 Jaya bahadur tiruwa Muga tiruwa Luee kotdanda mugu 910.4 Male 7 40945 7535076072 Saroj raut kurmi Rautahat GarudaBairiya 7 biswanath raut pramila devi pipariya dostiya 911.3 Male 8 42712 7569023079 NISHA BUDHa Bajura Sappata 6 GAN BAHADUR BUDHA AABHARI BUDHA CHUDARI 911.4 Female 9 35970 7260012119 RAMU TAMATATA Mugu Seri 5 Padam Bahadur Tamata Manamata Tamata Bamkanda 912.6 Female 10 36673 7375025003 Akbar Od Baitadi Pancheswor 3 Ganesh ram od Kalawati od Kalauti 915.4 Male 11 40529 7335011133 PRAMOD KUMAR PANDIT Rautahat Dharhari 5 MISHRI PANDIT URMILA DEVI 915.8 Male 12 42683 7525055002 BIMALA RAI Nuwakot Madanpur 4 Man Bahadur Rai Gauri Maya Rai Ghodghad 915.9 Female 13 42758 7525055016 SABIN AALE MAGAR Nuwakot Madanpur 4 Raj Kumar Aale Magqar Devi Aale Magar Ghodghad 915.9 Male 14 42459 7217094014 SOBHA DHAKAL Dolakha GhangSukathokar 2 Bishnu Prasad Dhakal
    [Show full text]
  • Door to Door Technical Assistance Reflection and Strategic Planning Session and Creating Platform to Develop Mutual Understanding
    Door to door technical assistance reflection and strategic planning session Activity Report On Door to Door Technical Assistance Reflection And Strategic Planning Session Organized By: Supported By: NRA Gorkha Date: 4th May, 2017 Door to door technical assistance reflection and strategic planning session Table of Content 1. Introduction .................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................... 1 1.2 Workshop Goal .............................................................................. 1 1.3 Workshop Objectives .................................................................... 1 1.4 Workshop Schedule ...................................................................... 2 1.5 Workshop Contents..………………………………………………………….…. 3 Annexes ................................................................................................... Annex 1: Registration of Participants ....................................................... Annex 2: Photographs .............................................................................. Door to door technical assistance reflection and strategic planning session 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background Nepal Earthquake of 2015 also called as The Gorkha Earthquake that struck in Nepal on April 25, 2015. About 9,000 people were killed, many thousands more were injured and more than 600,000 structures in Nepal were either damaged or destroyed. The earthquake was felt throughout central and
    [Show full text]
  • Letter of Agreement to Guide Multi-Purpose Cash Interventions in Earthquake Affected Vdcs in Gorkha District
    Letter of Agreement To guide multi-purpose cash interventions in earthquake affected VDCs in Gorkha District Background: The multi-purpose or unconditional cash grant (MPG) is based on the understanding that in the emergency period following the 26 April and 12 May earthquakes, the majority of affected households are struggling to meet their basic daily needs. The MPG is understood here as a one-off financial assistance with no conditions to receive and no restrictions to be spent by earthquake affected households. The value of the MPG has been agreed at 7,500 NRs (approximately 75 US$) for one month for one household.1 Parties: This document constitutes an agreement between the national/international non-governmental organization (I/NGO) ____________________________________ and the local authority ____________________________________ regarding the provision of multi-purpose cash assistance by the I/NGO to ______ (no.) earthquake affected households in _______________ VDC in Gorkha Districts. Cash-assistance can be provided as follows: 1. To damaged and destroyed households in the nine hard-to-reach northern VDCs2 ______ (no.) households in the following northern VDCs will receive multi-purpose grant in the amount of _______ per household for the duration of ________ months: ______________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ 2. To households included in the Government of Nepal’s Social Protection Program
    [Show full text]