A Simple Yet Deep 2-Player Board Game

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Simple Yet Deep 2-Player Board Game Dominect: A Simple yet Deep 2-Player Board Game Oswin Aichholzer1, Maarten Löffler2, Jayson Lynch3, Zuzana Masárová4, Joachim Orthaber1, Irene Parada5, Rosna Paul1, Daniel Perz1, Birgit Vogtenhuber1, and Alexandra Weinberger1 1Graz University of Technology, Austria; {oaich, ropaul, daperz, bvogt, aweinber}@ist.tugraz.at, [email protected] 2Utrecht University, the Netherlands; m.loffl[email protected] 3University of Waterloo, Canada; [email protected] 4IST Austria; [email protected] 5TU Eindhoven, the Netherlands; [email protected] Abstract In this work we introduce the perfect information 2-player game Dominect, which has recently been invented by two of the authors. Despite being a game with quite simple rules, Dominect reveals a surprisingly high depth of complexity. Next to the rules, this work comes with a webpage containing a print-cut-glue-and-play version of the game and further information. Moreover, we report on first results concerning the development of winning strategies, as well as a PSPACE-hardness result for deciding whether a given game position is a winning position. Introduction and Game Description Dominect is a finite, deterministic perfect information 2-player game developed by Oswin Aichholzer and Maarten Löffler during the 33rd Bellairs Winter Workshop on Computational Geometry in 2018. It belongs to the class of connection games, where a typical goal is to form a path connecting two opposite sides of the game board; see for example [1, 8]. Prominent members of this class are Hex (aka Con-tac-tix), TwixT, and Tak. But many others like Havannah, Connect, Gale (aka Bridg-It), or the Shannon switching game are also rather popular, as games or mathematical puzzles or both. The name Dominect comes from Domino and Connect, as the tokens used to play have the shape of dominoes of ratio 2 × 1 and the goal is to create a connecting chain of dominoes of their own color. A connecting chain of a player is a path of touching dominoes of that player that connects two opposite sides of Figure 1: Left: an empty 8 × 7 Dominect board. Right: a winning position for red. the board (left and right for the red player, top and bottom for the blue player). The first player to build a connecting chain will win the game. We next describe the rules of the game in more detail. The Rules of Dominect. Dominect is a two-player game that is played on a rectangular board of m × n squares, where the board size m; n ≥ 3 can vary. The left and right sides of the board are colored red (and called the red sides), and the top and bottom sides are colored blue (the blue sides). Each player gets an unlimited number of dominoes in their color (red and blue). A domino is 2 squares long and 1 square wide and can be placed horizontally or vertically (that is, covering 2 × 1 or 1 × 2 previously unoccupied neighboring squares of the board). The first player (red) starts by placing a red domino anywhere on the board. After that, it is the blue players turn to place a blue domino. Players alternate placing dominoes of their color as long as there are two neighbored empty squares and none of the players has won the game. The first player who completes a connecting chain of dominoes of their color wins, where a connecting chain is a path of dominoes of one color that touches both sides of the board of that color. Dominoes are touching each other, and thus form a path, if they are adjacent in either vertical, horizontal or diagonal direction. Especially, touching at a corner is sufficient for a connection. Note that during the game a domino can be placed in any valid place and orientation, and does not need to be connecting to previously placed dominoes. Only for a win, the relevant dominoes have to form a connecting chain. If neither player has won and no more valid moves are possible (there can be empty single squares left over) the game ends in a draw. It might seem natural to play on quadratic boards, that is, boards where m = n. But it turns out that, at least for small such boards, the first player has an advantage. Actually, we can show that for quadratic boards of size at most 9 × 9, the first player can always force a win. (For larger boards, it is not yet known whether a winning strategy for the first player exists.) A variant that can equalize this disadvantage of the second player is to play on an n × ¹n − 1º board, where the first player hast to play the distance n. Dominect is in several ways different from other popular connecting-games like Hex [4]: • A draw is possible, that is, there are situations, where no more valid move is possible, but still none of the players has created a connecting chain of their dominoes. The reason for this is that even when no valid move is possible anymore there can still be some unoccupied single squares left. Hex does not admit a draw [5,6]. • It is possible that a red connecting chain crosses a blue connecting chain, that is, both players could connect their board sides on the same board. The reason for this unusual behavior is that touching corners are sufficient to connect two dominoes. However, as the game ends as soon as one of the players has a connecting chain, such a situation will never occur during a regular game play. • Strategy stealing, an approach used to show that the second player cannot force a win for many games [2, 3], cannot be applied for Dominect. The reason is that each placed domino blocks several other potential domino placements (not only one). So giving one move away by placing a domino somewhere, as used in strategy stealing, can be a major obstacle and change the whole strategy. Dominect Webpage. To make Dominect publicly available, we have set up a webpage for the game at https://dominect.ist.tugraz.at, which provides among other things a short introduction of the game, the rules, and a print-cut-glue-and-play version of the game for download (Illustrations of some of this material can be found in the appendix of this paper). Further, we have implemented the game on the free online tabletop game platform Tabletopia. We also plan to provide Dominect on the popular Tabletop simulator available on the gaming platform Steam. In the remainder of this paper, we report on results concerning the development of winning strategies for Dominect as well as a PSPACE-hardness result for deciding whether a given game position is a winning position. We conclude with a short discussion on variants of Dominect. Winning Strategies and PSPACE-Hardness of Deciding Winning Positions For boards of size m × n with m ≤ 9 or n ≤ 8, we have a complete analysis whether one of the players can force a win (assuming that they both play perfectly). Table1 summarizes our findings. Detailed winning strategies that prove the entries of the table will be provided in a full version of this work. We next report on a basic approach that we developed and used to obtain these results. In the following, we assume w.l.o.g. that the red player just made a move (and has not yet won). We want to know for the resulting game position D if the red player can force a win, regardless of what the next moves of the blue player are. If yes, we call D a winning position (for the red player). Let CL = C1 to CR = Ck be the k ≥ 2 red connected components (sets of red dominoes and board sides which are connected) in D, where CL and CR contain the left and right side of the board, respectively. Starting from D, a bridge-move is a valid red move that connects two components Ci , Cj. Two valid red moves are independent if they cannot be blocked simultaneously by a single blue domino, that is, if no covered square of one move is identical to or sharing an edge with a covered square of the other move. Hence, if we can find 2` pairwise independent bridge-moves in D and pair them in a way that after performing either move per pair, the red player has connected CL and CR, and if the blue player cannot connect in at most ` moves, then D is a winning position for the red player. We further mention here that the concept of independent bridge-moves can be generalized to recognize winning positions even if connecting some of the components takes two or more moves (see Figure2 for a taste). The results in Table1 can be obtained by using this generalization in combination with a careful analysis of different starting moves. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Table 1: Overview, which board sizes are a first Figure 2: Depicted first player winning strategy on player win (red), a second player win the 7 × 7 board (the starting move, a pair (blue), and a draw (gray) if both players of independent bridge-moves to the left, play perfectly. and a generalization thereof to the right). In the full version of this work, we also show that given a game position D and a set of pairwise independent bridge-moves in D, one can efficiently compute whether D is a winning position in the above sense. This can also be used to develop an algorithm that identifies game positions from which one player can force a win even though D is not a winning position via pairwise independent bridge-moves.
Recommended publications
  • CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE Havannah, A
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE Havannah, a Monte Carlo Approach A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science By Roberto Nahue December 2014 The Thesis of Roberto Nahue is approved: ____________________________________ ________________ Professor Jeff Wiegley Date ____________________________________ ________________ Professor John Noga Date ___________________________________ ________________ Professor Richard Lorentz, Chair Date California State University, Northridge ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks to Professor Richard Lorentz for your constant support and your vast knowledge of computer game algorithms. You made it possible to bring Wanderer to life and you have helped me bring this thesis to completion. Thanks to my family for their support and especially my daughter who gave me that last push to complete my work. iii Table of Contents Signature Page .................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iii List of Figures .................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... vii Abstract ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • On the Huge Benefit of Decisive Moves in Monte-Carlo Tree Search Algorithms Fabien Teytaud, Olivier Teytaud
    On the Huge Benefit of Decisive Moves in Monte-Carlo Tree Search Algorithms Fabien Teytaud, Olivier Teytaud To cite this version: Fabien Teytaud, Olivier Teytaud. On the Huge Benefit of Decisive Moves in Monte-Carlo Tree Search Algorithms. IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games, Aug 2010, Copenhagen, Denmark. inria-00495078 HAL Id: inria-00495078 https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00495078 Submitted on 25 Jun 2010 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. On the Huge Benefit of Decisive Moves in Monte-Carlo Tree Search Algorithms Fabien Teytaud, Olivier Teytaud TAO (Inria), LRI, UMR 8623(CNRS - Univ. Paris-Sud), bat 490 Univ. Paris-Sud 91405 Orsay, France Abstract— Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) algorithms, Algorithm 1 The UCT algorithm in short. nextState(s,m) including upper confidence Bounds (UCT), have very good is the implementation of the rules of the game, and the results in the most difficult board games, in particular the ChooseMove() function is defined in Alg. 2. The constant game of Go. More recently these methods have been successfully k is to be tuned empirically. introduce in the games of Hex and Havannah.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1605.04715V1 [Cs.CC] 16 May 2016 of Hex Has Acquired a Special Spot in the Heart of Abstract Game Aficionados
    On the Complexity of Connection Games Edouard´ Bonnet [email protected] Sztaki, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Florian Jamain [email protected] Lamsade, Universit´eParis-Dauphine Abdallah Saffidine [email protected] Cse, The University of New South Wales Abstract In this paper, we study three connection games among the most widely played: havannah, twixt, and slither. We show that determining the outcome of an arbitrary input position is PSPACE-complete in all three cases. Our reductions are based on the popular graph problem generalized geography and on hex itself. We also consider the complexity of generalizations of hex parameterized by the length of the solution and establish that while short generalized hex is W[1]-hard, short hex is FPT. Finally, we prove that the ultra-weak solution to the empty starting position in hex cannot be fully adapted to any of these three games. Keywords: Complexity, Havannah, Twixt, Hex, Slither, PSPACE 1. Introduction Since its independent inventions in 1942 and 1948 by the poet and mathe- matician Piet Hein and the economist and mathematician John Nash, the game arXiv:1605.04715v1 [cs.CC] 16 May 2016 of hex has acquired a special spot in the heart of abstract game aficionados. Its purity and depth has lead Jack van Rijswijck to conclude his PhD thesis with the following hyperbole [1]. Hex has a Platonic existence, independent of human thought. If ever we find an extraterrestrial civilization at all, they will know hex, without any doubt. Hex not only exerts a fascination on players, but it is the root of the field of connection games which is being actively explored by game designers and researchers alike [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Playing and Solving Havannah
    University of Alberta Playing and Solving Havannah by Timo Ewalds A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Computing Science c Timo Ewalds Spring 2012 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l'édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-90390-2 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-90390-2 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats.
    [Show full text]
  • MONTE-CARLO TWIXT Janik Steinhauer
    MONTE-CARLO TWIXT Janik Steinhauer Master Thesis 10-08 Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science of Artificial Intelligence at the Faculty of Humanities and Sciences of Maastricht University Thesis committee: Dr. M. H. M. Winands Dr. ir. J. W. H. M. Uiterwijk J. A. M. Nijssen M.Sc. M. P. D. Schadd M.Sc. Maastricht University Department of Knowledge Engineering Maastricht, The Netherlands 17 June 2010 Preface This master thesis is the product of a research project in the program \Arti¯cial Intelligence" at Maas- tricht University. The work was supervised by Dr. Mark H. M. Winands. During the study, he gave lectures in the courses \Game AI" and \Intelligent Search Techniques". Especially the latter one con- centrates on how to build a strong AI for classic board games, most often two-player perfect-information zero-sum games. In the game of TwixT, few serious programs have been written that play at the strength of human amateurs. The probably most successful program so far is based on pattern matching. So it was an interesting question if it is possible to build a strong AI using a search-based approach, i.e., Monte- Carlo Tree Search. Further, it was not obvious how and which pieces of knowledge can be included in the search. So it has been an interesting research project with several surprising results and many challenging problems. I want to thank all people who helped me with my master project. Of greatest help to me was Dr. Mark Winands, who gave me a lot of feedback on my ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality-Based Rewards for Monte-Carlo Tree Search Simulations
    Quality-based Rewards for Monte-Carlo Tree Search Simulations Tom Pepels and Mandy J .W. Tak and Marc Lanctot and Mark H. M. Winands1 Abstract. Monte-Carlo Tree Search is a best-first search technique In this paper, two techniques are proposed for determining the based on simulations to sample the state space of a decision-making quality of a simulation based on properties of play-outs. The first, problem. In games, positions are evaluated based on estimates ob- Relative Bonus, assesses the quality of a simulation based on its tained from rewards of numerous randomized play-outs. Generally, length. The second, Qualitative Bonus, formulates a quality assess- rewards from play-outs are discrete values representing the outcome ment of the terminal state. Adjusting results in a specific way using of the game (loss, draw, or win), e.g., r 2 {−1; 0; 1g, which are these values leads to increased performance in six distinct two-player backpropagated from expanded leaf nodes to the root node. How- games. Moreover, we determine the advantage of using the Relative ever, a play-out may provide additional information. In this paper, Bonus in the General Game Playing agent CADIAPLAYER [4], win- we introduce new measures for assessing the a posteriori quality of ner of the International GGP Competition in 2007, 2008, and 2012. a simulation. We show that altering the rewards of play-outs based The paper is structured as follows. First, the general MCTS frame- on their assessed quality improves results in six distinct two-player work is discussed in Section 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Pruning Playouts in Monte-Carlo Tree Search for the Game of Havannah
    The 9th International Conference on Computers and Games Pruning playouts in Monte-Carlo Tree Search for the game of Havannah Joris Dugu´ep´eroux Ahmad Mazyad Fabien Teytaud Julien Dehos LISIC - Universit´edu Littoral C^oted'Opale June 2016 Dugu´ep´eroux,Mazyad, Teytaud, Dehos CG2016 - Pruning playouts in MCTS for the game of Havannah 1/22 Outline 1 The game of Havannah 2 Monte Carlo Tree Search & beyond 3 Proposed method 4 Results 5 Conclusion Dugu´ep´eroux,Mazyad, Teytaud, Dehos CG2016 - Pruning playouts in MCTS for the game of Havannah 2/22 Outline 1 The game of Havannah 2 Monte Carlo Tree Search & beyond 3 Proposed method 4 Results 5 Conclusion Dugu´ep´eroux,Mazyad, Teytaud, Dehos CG2016 - Pruning playouts in MCTS for the game of Havannah 2/22 The game of Havannah Presentation Invented by Christian Freeling in 1979. 2-player connection game. Hexagonal board of hexagonal cells. At each turn a player has to put a stone in an empty cell. To win a player has to realize one of these shapes: fork, bridge, ring. Dugu´ep´eroux,Mazyad, Teytaud, Dehos CG2016 - Pruning playouts in MCTS for the game of Havannah 3/22 The game of Havannah The winning shapes white wins with a ring white wins with a bridge white wins with a fork draw Dugu´ep´eroux,Mazyad, Teytaud, Dehos CG2016 - Pruning playouts in MCTS for the game of Havannah 4/22 Outline 1 The game of Havannah 2 Monte Carlo Tree Search & beyond 3 Proposed method 4 Results 5 Conclusion Dugu´ep´eroux,Mazyad, Teytaud, Dehos CG2016 - Pruning playouts in MCTS for the game of Havannah 4/22 Monte Carlo Tree Search & beyond MCTS principle Compute a good move to play.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Complexity of Connection Games Edouard Bonnet, Florian Jamain, Abdallah Saffidine
    On the Complexity of Connection Games Edouard Bonnet, Florian Jamain, Abdallah Saffidine To cite this version: Edouard Bonnet, Florian Jamain, Abdallah Saffidine. On the Complexity of Connection Games. The- oretical Computer Science, Elsevier, 2016, 644, pp.2-28. 10.1016/j.tcs.2016.06.033. hal-01994450 HAL Id: hal-01994450 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01994450 Submitted on 25 Jan 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. On the Complexity of Connection Games Édouard Bonnet [email protected] Sztaki, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Florian Jamain [email protected] Lamsade, Université Paris-Dauphine Abdallah Saffidine [email protected] Cse, The University of New South Wales, Abstract In this paper, we study three connection games among the most widely played: havannah, twixt, and slither. We show that determining the outcome of an arbitrary input position is PSPACE-complete in all three cases. Our reductions are based on the popular graph problem generalized geography and on hex itself. We also consider the complexity of generalizations of hex parameterized by the length of the solution and establish that while short generalized hex is W[1]-hard, short hex is FPT.
    [Show full text]
  • Embed the Rules
    60 Game Design Patterns Embed the Rules Cameron Browne, Queensland University of Technology (QUT) This article examines the concept of embedding the rules of a game in its equipment, as a general pattern for good game design. Several examples demonstrate the benefits of doing so. An analogy is drawn with the Japanese concept of poka-yoke, or mistake-proofing, in manufacturing design. 1 Introduction For example, consider the Heptalion puzzle shown in Figure 1, in which the aim is to place HIS series on Game Design Patterns aims to the five tiles, each showing a pair of symbols, to T explore fundamental principles that encour- exactly cover the set of matching symbols on the age good game designs. While this term is remi- left [3]. These rules are trivially simple and in- niscent of the ‘game programming patterns’ de- stantly intuitive; no player who has played the scribed in the book of the same name [1], its use game should ever need to reread them. there refers to software programming practices in video game development, whereas a ‘game design pattern’ here refers to any practice that encourages good designs in games and puzzles.1 This first installment in the series looks at the concept of embedding the rules in the equipment. To ‘embed the rules’ means to use rele- vant features of the game’s physical components (board, pieces, environment, etc.), to enforce im- plicit rules which then do not need to be explicitly stated to players. This might also be described as Figure 1. ‘hiding the rules in the equipment’, or phrased as A Heptalion challenge and pieces.
    [Show full text]
  • Hex (Board Game)
    Hex (board game) Hex is a strategy board game for two players played on a hexagonal grid, theoretically of any size and several possible Hex shapes, but traditionally as an 11×11 rhombus. Players alternate placing markers or stones on unoccupied spaces in an attempt to link their opposite sides of the board in an unbroken chain. One player must win; there are no draws. The game has deep strategy, sharp tactics and a profound mathematical underpinning related to the Brouwer fixed-point theorem. It was invented in the 1940s independently by two mathematicians, Piet Hein and John Nash. The game was first marketed as a board game in Denmark under the name Con-tac-tix, and Parker Brothers marketed a version of it in 1952 called Hex; they are no longer in production. Hex can 11×11 Hex gameboard showing a also be played with paper and pencil on hexagonally ruled graph winning configuration for Blue paper. Years 1942–present Hex-related research is current in the areas of topology, graph active and matroid theory, combinatorics, game theory and artificial Genre(s) Board game intelligence. Abstract strategy game Connection game Contents Players 2 Setup time None Game type Playing 30 minutes – 2 hours History time (11×11 board) Published games Random None Shannon's hex machine chance Research timeline Skill(s) Strategy, tactics Automatons required Game play Strategy Mathematical theory Computational complexity of generalizations Computed strategies for smaller boards Game tree of 11 by 11 Hex Variants Rectangular grids and paper and pencil Board sizes Misère hex Blockbusters Y Havannah Projex Competition See also References Further reading External links Game type Hex is a connection game, and can be classified as a Maker-Breaker game, a particular type of positional game.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Potential in Games
    University College Dublin Lecture for AI for Games and Puzzles Strategic Potential in Games Cameron Browne Maastricht University 8/11/2018 Outline Prior work: • Automated Game Design • Measuring Game Quality Current work: • Reconstruction of Ancient Games Importance of Strategic Potential Connection Games Games in which players aim to complete a given type of connection with their pieces: • Connecting goals, • Completing a loop, • Gathering pieces, • etc. Hex: • Invented 1940s • Connect own opposite sides • Source of all connection games Connection Games Most players know a few: • Hex, Havannah, TwixT, Bridg-It, Y, Star, … Connection Games: Variations on a Theme (2005): • Survey of genre • Found over 200 • Most games involve some aspect of connection Connection Games Almost all are combinations of same few rules: • Hex: Connect own opposite sides • Chameleon: Connect any opposite sides • Jade: Connect opposite sides or all sides • Havannah: Connect three sides or corners or form loop • Unlur: Connect two or three sides • Y: Connect three sides (triangular board) • TwixT: Connect opposite sides (square board with bridge moves) • Quax: Connect opposite sides (square board with bridge moves) • Gonnect: Connect opposite sides (square board with surround capture) All Games Almost all games are new combinations of existing ideas Truly revolutionary ideas in games are rare: • e.g. Connection as a goal – Inspired by a mathematical problem • “Nothing new under the sun” Obvious question: • Why not evolve rule sets to create new games? Evolutionary
    [Show full text]
  • On the Complexity of Connection Games
    On the Complexity of Connection Games Édouard Bonnet [email protected] Sztaki, Hungarian Academy of Sciences Florian Jamain [email protected] Lamsade, Université Paris-Dauphine Abdallah Saffidine [email protected] Cse, The University of New South Wales, Abstract In this paper, we study three connection games among the most widely played: havannah, twixt, and slither. We show that determining the outcome of an arbitrary input position is PSPACE-complete in all three cases. Our reductions are based on the popular graph problem generalized geography and on hex itself. We also consider the complexity of generalizations of hex parameterized by the length of the solution and establish that while short generalized hex is W[1]-hard, short hex is FPT. Finally, we prove that the ultra-weak solution to the empty starting position in hex cannot be fully adapted to any of these three games. Keywords: Complexity, Havannah, Twixt, Hex, Slither, PSPACE 1. Introduction Since its independent inventions in 1942 and 1948 by the poet and mathe- matician Piet Hein and the economist and mathematician John Nash, the game of hex has acquired a special spot in the heart of abstract game aficionados. Its purity and depth has lead Jack van Rijswijck to conclude his PhD thesis with the following hyperbole [1]. Hex has a Platonic existence, independent of human thought. If ever we find an extraterrestrial civilization at all, they will know hex, without any doubt. Hex not only exerts a fascination on players, but it is the root of the field of connection games which is being actively explored by game designers and researchers alike [2].
    [Show full text]