DOCSLIB.ORG

Southern Gulf of California Thread Herring Fishery, Sinaloa & Nayarit, Mexico MSC Fishery Assessment Report Announcement Comment Draft Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Southern Gulf of California Thread Herring Fishery, Sinaloa & Nayarit, Mexico MSC Fishery Assessment Report Announcement Comment Draft Report SCS Global Services Report Southern Gulf of California Thread Herring Fishery, Sinaloa & Nayarit, Mexico MSC Fishery Assessment Report Announcement Comment Draft Report Authors Client Andrew Bystrom, Team Leader Maz Sardina, S.A. De C.V. Dr. Carlos Alvarez, Principal 1 Ing. Armando Coppel Azcona Dr. Hans Hartmann, Principal 2 Estero De Urías S.N. int. D, Col. Urías, Mazatlán, Sinaloa, México, 82099 Mariano Castro, Principal 3 July 14, 2021 SCS Global Services Report 1 Table of Contents Southern Gulf of California Thread Herring Fishery, Sinaloa & Nayarit, Mexico 1 MSC Fishery Assessment Report 1 1 Table of Contents 2 2 Table of Figures 4 3 Glossary 5 4 Executive Summary 7 5 Report Details 9 5.1 Authorship and peer review details 9 1.2 Version details 12 6 Unit(s) of Assessment and Certification and results overview 13 6.1 Unit(s) of Assessment (UoA) and Unit(s) of Certification 13 6.2 Assessment results overview 15 7. Traceability and eligibility 17 7.1 Eligibility date 17 7.2 Traceability within the fishery 17 7.3 Eligibility to enter further chains of custody 19 7.4 Eligibility of Inseparable or Practicably Inseparable (IPI) stock(s) to Enter Further Chains of Custody19 8 Scoring 20 8.1 Summary of Performance Indicator level scores 20 8.2 Principle 1 22 8.3 Principle 2 59 8.4 Principle 3 151 9 Appendices 182 9.1 Assessment information 182 9.2 Evaluation processes and techniques 189 9.3 Peer Review reports 191 9.4 Stakeholder input 191 Conditions 192 Condition 1-1 193 Condition 1-3 (Part A) 197 Condition 1-5 201 Condition 1-6 205 Condition 1-7 207 Condition 2-1, 2-2, 2-3 and 2-4 208 Condition 2-5 214 Condition 2-6 219 Condition 3-2 222 Condition 3-3 228 Version 6-0 (September 2020) | © SCS Global Services | MSC V1.2 Page 2 of 175 SCS Global Services Report Condition 3-6 233 9.5 Client Action Plan 235 9.6 Surveillance 235 9.7 Harmonised fishery assessments 236 9.8 Objection Procedure 237 10 References 238 11 Template information and copyright 253 Version 6-0 (September 2020) | © SCS Global Services | MSC V1.2 Page 3 of 175 SCS Global Services Report 2 Table of Figures Table 1. Unit of Certification(s) and Unit of Assessment(s) .......................................................................... 7 Table 2. Fisheries program documents versions ........................................................................................ 12 Table 3. Unit of Assessment and Unit of Certification ................................................................................ 13 Table 4. Principle level scores ..................................................................................................................... 15 Table 5. Summary of conditions ................................................................................................................. 16 Table 6. Traceability within the fishery ....................................................................................................... 18 Table 7. Summary of Draft Performance Indicator Scores and Associated Weights Used to Calculate Principle Scores. .......................................................................................................................................... 20 Table 8. Draft Principle Scores .................................................................................................................... 21 Table 9.Actively versus passively managed small pelagics. Small pelagic species categorized for two main forms of management in the November 2012 Fisheries Management Plan for Small Pelagics in the Gulf of California Mexico. ................................................................................................................................... 33 Table 10. Biologically Acceptable Catch in t of thread herring for 2021 in the southern Gulf of California and parameters used in the calculations. Data from Jacob-Cervantes and Payán-Alejo (2020). ............... 35 Table 11. Catch history in metric tons and effort of small pelagics in the southern Gulf of California. Data from Jacob-Cervantes et al. (2020). ............................................................................................................ 36 Table 12. Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and catch data. .............................................................................. 39 Table 13. 2015-2010 observed catch in tons from the Sinaloa thread herring fishery (Inapesca 2015- 2020) ........................................................................................................................................................... 62 Table 14: Observed Elasmobranchii catch in tons from 2015-2020 separated by retained catch and discards (alive and dead) (Inapesca 2015-2020) ......................................................................................... 63 Table 15: Observed mammal and seabird sightings and sea turtle discards (number of individuals) from 2015-2020 (Inapesca 2015-2020) ............................................................................................................... 65 Table 16. Summary of Non-target Species as Categorized for Evaluation ................................................. 66 Table 15. Summary of previous assessment conditions ........................................................................... 182 Table 18. Audit Plan: Key Meetings and Locations ................................................................................... 189 Table 19. Decision Rule for Calculating Performance Indicator Scores based on Scoring Issues, and for Calculating Performance Indicator Scores in Cases of Multiple Scoring Elements. (Adapted from MSC FCPV2.2 Table 4) ....................................................................................................................................... 191 Table 20. Summary of Stakeholder Submissions ...................................................................................... 191 Table 21: Summary of conditions for the 2016 assessment ..................................................................... 192 Table 22 Condition X NEW ........................................................................................................................ 234 Table 23. Fishery surveillance audit .......................................................................................................... 235 Table 24. Timing of surveillance audit ...................................................................................................... 235 Table 25. Surveillance level rationale ....................................................................................................... 235 Table 26. Fisheries in the MSC System Considered for Harmonization. ................................................... 236 Table 27. Overlapping fisheries................................................................................................................. 236 Table 28. Alignment of Scores for Harmonization .................................................................................... 236 Table 29. Rationale for scoring differences .............................................................................................. 236 Version 6-0 (September 2020) | © SCS Global Services | MSC V1.2 Page 4 of 175 SCS Global Services Report 3 Glossary BAC Biologically Acceptable Catch CCNNA Advisory Committee for the Normalization of Agricultural Food Production (Consejo Consultivo Nacional de Normalización Agroalimentaria) CEPA State Council of Fisheries and Aquaculture (Consejo Estatal de Pesca y Acuicultura) CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora CNP National Fisheries Chart (Carta Nacional Pesquera) CNPA National Council of Fisheries and Aquaculture (Consejo Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura) CONANP The National Commission of Natural Protected Areas (Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas) CONAPESCA National Council of Fishing and Aquaculture (Comisión Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura) DOF Official gazette (Diario official de la Federación) EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone ETP Endangered, Threatened or Protected species F Fishing mortality FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FCM Fisheries Certification Methodology FIDEMAR Fidecomiso del Mar FMP Fishery management plan IFQ Individual Fishing Quota INAPESCA National Fisheries Institute (Instituto Nacional de Pesca) IPI Inseparable or Practicably Inseparable ITQ Individual Transferable Quota Kg Kilogram Lb. Pound, equivalent to roughly 2.2 kg LGPAS Fisheries Law (Ley General de Pesca y Acuacultura Sustentables) LOA Length Over-All M Million (lbs.) MCS Monitoring, Control, and Surveillance MSC Marine Stewardship Council MSE Management Strategy Evaluation MSY Maximum sustainable yield nm nautical mile NOM Official Mexican Norms (Norma Oficial Mexicana) OFL Over-Fishing Level OY Optimal Yield PI Performance Indicator PRI Point where recruitment is impared PROFEPA Federal Attorney for Environmental Protection (Procuraduría Federal de Protección al Ambiente) Version 6-0 (September 2020) | © SCS Global Services | MSC V1.2 Page 5 of 175 SCS Global Services Report PROMAR Mexican Fund for Fisheries and Aquaculture Development (Fondo Mexicano para el Desarrollo Pesquero y Acuícola) SAGARPA Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development (Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadaría, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación) SCS SCS Global Services SEMARNAT The Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources (Secretaría de Medio Ambiente
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Monitoring Elasmobranch Assemblages in a Data-Poor Country from the Eastern Tropical Pacific Using Baited Remote Underwater Vide
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Monitoring elasmobranch assemblages in a data‑poor country from the Eastern Tropical Pacifc using baited remote underwater video stations Mario Espinoza1,2,3*, Tatiana Araya‑Arce1,2, Isaac Chaves‑Zamora1,2,4, Isaac Chinchilla5 & Marta Cambra1,2 Understanding how threatened species are distributed in space and time can have direct applications to conservation planning. However, implementing standardized methods to monitor populations of wide‑ranging species is often expensive and challenging. In this study, we used baited remote underwater video stations (BRUVS) to quantify elasmobranch abundance and distribution patterns across a gradient of protection in the Pacifc waters of Costa Rica. Our BRUVS survey detected 29 species, which represents 54% of the entire elasmobranch diversity reported to date in shallow waters (< 60 m) of the Pacifc of Costa Rica. Our data demonstrated that elasmobranchs beneft from no‑take MPAs, yet large predators are relatively uncommon or absent from open‑fshing sites. We showed that BRUVS are capable of providing fast and reliable estimates of the distribution and abundance of data‑poor elasmobranch species over large spatial and temporal scales, and in doing so, they can provide critical information for detecting population‑level changes in response to multiple threats such as overfshing, habitat degradation and climate change. Moreover, given that 66% of the species detected are threatened, a well‑designed BRUVS survey may provide crucial population data for assessing the conservation status of elasmobranchs. These eforts led to the establishment of a national monitoring program focused on elasmobranchs and key marine megafauna that could guide monitoring eforts at a regional scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of the Artisanal Elasmobranch Fisheries Off The
    3 National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin First U.S. Commissioner established in 1881 of Fisheries and founder NOAA of Fishery Bulletin Abstract—The landings of the artis- Characterization of the artisanal elasmobranch anal elasmobranch fisheries of 3 com- munities located along the Pacific coast fisheries off the Pacific coast of Guatemala of Guatemala from May 2017 through March 2020 were evaluated. Twenty- Cristopher G. Avalos Castillo (contact author)1,2 one elasmobranch species were iden- 3,4 tified in this study. Bottom longlines Omar Santana Morales used for multispecific fishing captured ray species and represented 59% of Email address for contact author: [email protected] the fishing effort. Gill nets captured small shark species and represented 1 Fundación Mundo Azul 3 Facultad de Ciencias Marinas 41% of the fishing effort. The most fre- Carretera a Villa Canales Universidad Autónoma de Baja California quently caught species were the longtail km 21-22 Finca Moran Carretera Ensenada-Tijuana 3917 stingray (Hypanus longus), scalloped 01069 Villa Canales, Guatemala Fraccionamiento Playitas hammerhead (Sphyrna lewini), and 2 22860 Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico Pacific sharpnose shark (Rhizopriono- Centro de Estudios del Mar y Acuicultura 4 don longurio), accounting for 47.88%, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala ECOCIMATI A.C. 33.26%, and 7.97% of landings during Ciudad Universitaria Zona 12 Avenida del Puerto 2270 the monitoring period, respectively. Edificio M14 Colonia Hidalgo The landings were mainly neonates 01012 Guatemala City, Guatemala 22880 Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico and juveniles. Our findings indicate the presence of nursery areas on the continental shelf off Guatemala.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bigeye Scad, Selar Crumenophthalmus (Bloch, 1793) (Family Carangidae), New to the California Marine Fauna, with a List to and Keys for All California Carangids
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Occidental College Scholar Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences Volume 114 | Issue 3 Article 4 2016 The iB geye Scad, Selar crumenophthalmus (Bloch, 1793) (Family Carangidae), New to the California Marine Fauna, with a List to and Keys for All California Carangids Milton S. Love Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, [email protected] Julianne Kalman Passarelli Cabrillo Beach Marine Aquarium, 3720 Stephen M White Dr, San Pedro, CA 90731 Chris Okamoto Cabrillo Beach Marine Aquarium, 3720 Stephen M White Dr, San Pedro, CA 90731 Dario W. Diehl Southern California Water Research Project, 3535 Harbor Blvd., Suite 110, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.oxy.edu/scas Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Love, Milton S.; Passarelli, Julianne Kalman; Okamoto, Chris; and Diehl, Dario W. (2015) "The iB geye Scad, Selar crumenophthalmus (Bloch, 1793) (Family Carangidae), New to the California Marine Fauna, with a List to and Keys for All California Carangids," Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences: Vol. 114: Iss. 3. Available at: https://scholar.oxy.edu/scas/vol114/iss3/4 This Research Note is brought to you for free and open access by OxyScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences by an authorized editor of OxyScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Love et al.: Bigeye Scad, New to California Bull.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites of Loligo Gahi from Waters Off the Falkland Islands, with a Phylogenetically Based Identification of Their Cestode Larvae
    Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen 2289 Parasites of Loligo gahi from waters off the Falkland Islands, with a phylogenetically based identification of their cestode larvae Paul Brickle, Peter D. Olson, D. Timothy J. Littlewood, Antony Bishop, and Alexander I. Arkhipkin Abstract: One thousand and ninety-six longfin Patagonian squid, Loligo gahi, were collected from waters off the Falkland Islands over a period of 1 year and 4 months and examined for helminths. Cestode and Anisakis sp. (Nematoda) larvae were present throughout the study, but occurred at low rates. The pooled data showed prevalences of 5.75 and 2.46%, respectively. An adult digenean, Derogenes varicus, was found in a single instance and was thus con- sidered an accidental infection. Parasite parameters were not significantly correlated with either host sex or seasonality. Stomach contents of the squid revealed a highly varied diet, although krill, amphipods, and chaetognaths were the dominant prey items. To aid in the identification of the cestode larvae, a subsample of 14 plerocercoids was character- ized for the D2 variable region of the nuclear lsrDNA gene and compared with both published cestode lsrDNA se- quences as well as that of six additional adult tetraphyllidean cestode species sequenced herein. Direct sequence comparison showed that 12 of the 14 plerocercoids were identical with each other and differed by a single transition (of a total of 658 base pairs) from the tetraphyllidean Clistobothrium montaukensis, and another plerocercoid differed by two transitions from the trypanorhynch Grillotia erinaceus. The remaining pleroceroid sequence was identified through phylogenetic analysis as being closer to the tetraphyllidean Ceratobothrium xanthocephalum than to any other taxon analyzed, but may not be congeneric, given its relatively high degree of divergence from C.
    [Show full text]
  • Peces De La Fauna De Acompañamiento En La Pesca Industrial De Camarón En El Golfo De California, México
    Peces de la fauna de acompañamiento en la pesca industrial de camarón en el Golfo de California, México Juana López-Martínez1, Eloisa Herrera-Valdivia1, Jesús Rodríguez-Romero2 & Sergio Hernández-Vázquez2 1. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C. Km 2.35 Carretera a Las Tinajas, S/N Colonia Tinajas, Guaymas, Sonora, México C. P. 85460; [email protected], [email protected] 2. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C. Apdo. postal 128 La Paz, B.C.S. C.P. 23000; [email protected], [email protected] Recibido 19-VII-2009. Corregido 15-III-2010. Aceptado 16-IV-2010. Abstract: Bycatch fish species from shrimp industrial fishery in the Gulf of California, Mexico. The shrimp fishery in the Gulf of California is one the most important activities of revenue and employment for communi- ties. Nevertheless, this fishery has also created a large bycatch problem, principally fish. To asses this issue, a group of observers were placed on board the industrial shrimp fleet and evaluated the Eastern side of the Gulf during 2004 and 2005. Studies consisted on 20kg samples of the capture for each trawl, and made possible a sys- tematic list of species for this geographic area. Fish represented 70% of the capture. A total of 51 101 fish were collected, belonging to two classes, 20 orders, 65 families, 127 genera, and 241 species. The order Perciformes was the most diverse with 31 families, 78 genera, and 158 species. The best represented families by number of species were: Sciaenidae (34) and Paralichthyidae (18) and Haemulidae and Carangidae (16 each).
    [Show full text]
  • Estructura Y Distribución De La Comunidad Íctica Acompañante En La Pesca Del Camarón (Golfo De Tehuantepec
    Estructura y distribución de la comunidad íctica acompañante en la pesca del camarón (Golfo de Tehuantepec. Pacífico Oriental, México) Marco A. Martínez-Muñoz ADVERTIMENT. La consulta d’aquesta tesi queda condicionada a l’acceptació de les següents condicions d'ús: La difusió d’aquesta tesi per mitjà del servei TDX (www.tdx.cat) ha estat autoritzada pels titulars dels drets de propietat intel·lectual únicament per a usos privats emmarcats en activitats d’investigació i docència. No s’autoritza la seva reproducció amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva difusió i posada a disposició des d’un lloc aliè al servei TDX. No s’autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant al resum de presentació de la tesi com als seus continguts. En la utilització o cita de parts de la tesi és obligat indicar el nom de la persona autora. ADVERTENCIA. La consulta de esta tesis queda condicionada a la aceptación de las siguientes condiciones de uso: La difusión de esta tesis por medio del servicio TDR (www.tdx.cat) ha sido autorizada por los titulares de los derechos de propiedad intelectual únicamente para usos privados enmarcados en actividades de investigación y docencia. No se autoriza su reproducción con finalidades de lucro ni su difusión y puesta a disposición desde un sitio ajeno al servicio TDR. No se autoriza la presentación de su contenido en una ventana o marco ajeno a TDR (framing). Esta reserva de derechos afecta tanto al resumen de presentación de la tesis como a sus contenidos.
    [Show full text]
  • Intrinsic Vulnerability in the Global Fish Catch
    The following appendix accompanies the article Intrinsic vulnerability in the global fish catch William W. L. Cheung1,*, Reg Watson1, Telmo Morato1,2, Tony J. Pitcher1, Daniel Pauly1 1Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia, Aquatic Ecosystems Research Laboratory (AERL), 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada 2Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, Universidade dos Açores, 9901-862 Horta, Portugal *Email: [email protected] Marine Ecology Progress Series 333:1–12 (2007) Appendix 1. Intrinsic vulnerability index of fish taxa represented in the global catch, based on the Sea Around Us database (www.seaaroundus.org) Taxonomic Intrinsic level Taxon Common name vulnerability Family Pristidae Sawfishes 88 Squatinidae Angel sharks 80 Anarhichadidae Wolffishes 78 Carcharhinidae Requiem sharks 77 Sphyrnidae Hammerhead, bonnethead, scoophead shark 77 Macrouridae Grenadiers or rattails 75 Rajidae Skates 72 Alepocephalidae Slickheads 71 Lophiidae Goosefishes 70 Torpedinidae Electric rays 68 Belonidae Needlefishes 67 Emmelichthyidae Rovers 66 Nototheniidae Cod icefishes 65 Ophidiidae Cusk-eels 65 Trachichthyidae Slimeheads 64 Channichthyidae Crocodile icefishes 63 Myliobatidae Eagle and manta rays 63 Squalidae Dogfish sharks 62 Congridae Conger and garden eels 60 Serranidae Sea basses: groupers and fairy basslets 60 Exocoetidae Flyingfishes 59 Malacanthidae Tilefishes 58 Scorpaenidae Scorpionfishes or rockfishes 58 Polynemidae Threadfins 56 Triakidae Houndsharks 56 Istiophoridae Billfishes 55 Petromyzontidae
    [Show full text]
  • En Guaymas, Sonora, Durante L
    BYCATCH OF THE ARTISANAL SHRIMP FISHERY IN THE GULF OF CALIFORNIA (SONORA AND SINALOA) MEXICO Report prepared by Alejandro Balmori Ramírez (INAPESCA, CRIP-Guaymas) and Rufino Morales Azpeitia (CIBNOR-Unidad Guaymas), in collaboration with Everardo Miranda Mier and Jesús Guadalupe Padilla Serrato. Guaymas, Sonora, México. June 2012 Summary One of the most important fishing resources in Mexico is shrimp, this is due to its high economic and social value. Nonetheless, many non-target species are captured incidentally during shrimp-fishing activities, and grouped as faunal companions or shrimp bycatch (SBC). Most of the SBC species have not been studied and the impact of this fishery upon them is yet unknown. This document presents the results of a study on the artisanal shrimp fisheries’ bycatch within the bays of Guaymas, Bahía de Lobos, and El Tóbari, in the State of Sonora; and in Santa Maria La Reforma in the State of Sinaloa, during the 2011–2012 shrimp fishing season. The study collected shrimp and SBC samples, identified the organisms to the species level, and recorded biological sampling (biometrics). Logbook data and sampling information was captured in a database. We documented 854 fishing hauls for all of the bays. SBC analysis shows a total composition of 46 identified species belonging to different taxonomic groups such as fishes, crustaceans, gastropods, and elasmobranchs, and an additional 10 species identified to the genus level only. The most diverse group was that of bony fishes and the most dominant species was the swimming crab (Callinectes spp.). The amount of SBC species varied spatially (lagoon system). During the shrimping activity, a high percentage (20-30%) of negative fishing hauls (i.e., without any SBC captures) was recorded, indicating that the artisanal shrimp fishery does not generate any bycatch in a third of all fishing hauls.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Coastal Marine Fishes of California
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 157 GUIDE TO THE COASTAL MARINE FISHES OF CALIFORNIA by DANIEL J. MILLER and ROBERT N. LEA Marine Resources Region 1972 ABSTRACT This is a comprehensive identification guide encompassing all shallow marine fishes within California waters. Geographic range limits, maximum size, depth range, a brief color description, and some meristic counts including, if available: fin ray counts, lateral line pores, lateral line scales, gill rakers, and vertebrae are given. Body proportions and shapes are used in the keys and a state- ment concerning the rarity or commonness in California is given for each species. In all, 554 species are described. Three of these have not been re- corded or confirmed as occurring in California waters but are included since they are apt to appear. The remainder have been recorded as occurring in an area between the Mexican and Oregon borders and offshore to at least 50 miles. Five of California species as yet have not been named or described, and ichthyologists studying these new forms have given information on identification to enable inclusion here. A dichotomous key to 144 families includes an outline figure of a repre- sentative for all but two families. Keys are presented for all larger families, and diagnostic features are pointed out on most of the figures. Illustrations are presented for all but eight species. Of the 554 species, 439 are found primarily in depths less than 400 ft., 48 are meso- or bathypelagic species, and 67 are deepwater bottom dwelling forms rarely taken in less than 400 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Speciation of Two Stingrays with Antitropical Distributions: Low Levels of Divergence in Mitochondrial DNA and Morphological Characters Suggest Recent Evolution
    The following supplement accompanies the article Speciation of two stingrays with antitropical distributions: low levels of divergence in mitochondrial DNA and morphological characters suggest recent evolution A. Le Port1,2,*, M. D. M. Pawley3, S. D. Lavery1,2 1Leigh Marine Laboratory, University of Auckland, PO Box 349, Warkworth 0941, New Zealand 2School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand 3Institute of Information and Mathematical Sciences, Massey University, Auckland 0745, New Zealand Aquatic Biology 19: 153–165 (2013) Supplement. Details of specimens and characters used in analyses, and raw morphological data. 1 Table S1. List of specimens used in molecular and morphometric and meristic analyses. *x-ray data available Species Country Sampling location Sample code/voucher number Sex mtDNA markers CO1 cytb dloop Ingroups Dasyatis brevicaudata Australia Melbourne, SW Pacific, VIC Dbr05ME01 (Short-tailed stingray) Dbr05ME02 X X X Dbr05ME03 Dbr05ME04 Dbr07ME04 Storm Bay, Tasmania Dbr07Tas01/H6257-01* F X Gascoyne Seamount, Tasman Sea Dbr07Tas02/H6312-19* M Rottnest Island, Eastern Indian Ocean, WA Dbr07WA01/H6340-17* F Dbr07WA02/H6346-25* F X X Dbr07WA06 New Zealand Manukau Harbour, Tasman Sea Dbr04Ma02 Dbr07Ma02 Leigh outpost, SW Pacific Dbr04Le01 Mokohinau Islands, SW Pacific Dbr04MOO2 Dbr04MO05 Bay of Islands, SW Pacific Dbr05BI01 X X X Marlborough Sounds, SW Pacific Dbr05MS02 Poor Knights Islands, SW Pacific Dbr05PK22 Dbr05PK29 Waitemata Harbour, SW Pacific Dbr05Wa01 Coromandel
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation Status of North American, Central American, and Caribbean Chondrichthyans the Conservation Status Of
    The Conservation Status of North American, Central American, and Caribbean Chondrichthyans The Conservation Status of Edited by The Conservation Status of North American, Central and Caribbean Chondrichthyans North American, Central American, Peter M. Kyne, John K. Carlson, David A. Ebert, Sonja V. Fordham, Joseph J. Bizzarro, Rachel T. Graham, David W. Kulka, Emily E. Tewes, Lucy R. Harrison and Nicholas K. Dulvy L.R. Harrison and N.K. Dulvy E.E. Tewes, Kulka, D.W. Graham, R.T. Bizzarro, J.J. Fordham, Ebert, S.V. Carlson, D.A. J.K. Kyne, P.M. Edited by and Caribbean Chondrichthyans Executive Summary This report from the IUCN Shark Specialist Group includes the first compilation of conservation status assessments for the 282 chondrichthyan species (sharks, rays, and chimaeras) recorded from North American, Central American, and Caribbean waters. The status and needs of those species assessed against the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species criteria as threatened (Critically Endangered, Endangered, and Vulnerable) are highlighted. An overview of regional issues and a discussion of current and future management measures are also presented. A primary aim of the report is to inform the development of chondrichthyan research, conservation, and management priorities for the North American, Central American, and Caribbean region. Results show that 13.5% of chondrichthyans occurring in the region qualify for one of the three threatened categories. These species face an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild (Critically Endangered; 1.4%), a very high risk of extinction in the wild (Endangered; 1.8%), or a high risk of extinction in the wild (Vulnerable; 10.3%).
    [Show full text]
  • 61661147.Pdf
    Resource Inventory of Marine and Estuarine Fishes of the West Coast and Alaska: A Checklist of North Pacific and Arctic Ocean Species from Baja California to the Alaska–Yukon Border OCS Study MMS 2005-030 and USGS/NBII 2005-001 Project Cooperation This research addressed an information need identified Milton S. Love by the USGS Western Fisheries Research Center and the Marine Science Institute University of California, Santa Barbara to the Department University of California of the Interior’s Minerals Management Service, Pacific Santa Barbara, CA 93106 OCS Region, Camarillo, California. The resource inventory [email protected] information was further supported by the USGS’s National www.id.ucsb.edu/lovelab Biological Information Infrastructure as part of its ongoing aquatic GAP project in Puget Sound, Washington. Catherine W. Mecklenburg T. Anthony Mecklenburg Report Availability Pt. Stephens Research Available for viewing and in PDF at: P. O. Box 210307 http://wfrc.usgs.gov Auke Bay, AK 99821 http://far.nbii.gov [email protected] http://www.id.ucsb.edu/lovelab Lyman K. Thorsteinson Printed copies available from: Western Fisheries Research Center Milton Love U. S. Geological Survey Marine Science Institute 6505 NE 65th St. University of California, Santa Barbara Seattle, WA 98115 Santa Barbara, CA 93106 [email protected] (805) 893-2935 June 2005 Lyman Thorsteinson Western Fisheries Research Center Much of the research was performed under a coopera- U. S. Geological Survey tive agreement between the USGS’s Western Fisheries
    [Show full text]