DOCSLIB.ORG

Genesee River Basin Report Card

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Genesee River Basin Report Card Genesee RiverWatch Protecting and Celebrating Our River 1 Report Card • We recently released our first Report Card that grades the Genesee River and its major tributaries on water quality • Its purpose is to raise awareness of the environmental challenges that face the Genesee River Basin so that actions can be taken to improve the state of the watershed 2 Report Card 3 Water Quality Data • Water Quality Data from SUNY Brockport Study (2013) – Samples collected at all six tributaries and the main stem at Rochester during the study – Each location was sampled 48 to 52 times over a one year period – Next two slides provide an indication of the variability of that data 4 TP Data Variability Total Phosphorus (Oatka Creek) 180.0 Event 160.0 Non Event 140.0 120.0 100.0 TP TP (µg/L) 80.0 60.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 6/1/2010 8/15/2010 10/29/2010 1/12/2011 3/28/2011 Date Collected 5 TSS Data Variability Total Suspended Solids (Oatka Creek) 45 40 Event Non Event 35 30 25 20 TSS TSS (mg/L) 15 10 5 0 6/1/2010 8/15/2010 10/29/2010 1/12/2011 3/28/2011 Date Collected 6 Water Quality Data • Total Phosphorus grade based upon • Percent below 65 ppb threshold • NYSDEC standard being considered for moving water • Total Suspended Solids grade based upon • Percent below 25 ppm threshold • Selected by Genesee RiverWatch based upon range of values seen in major tributaries 7 Total Phosphorus Total Phosphorus 100 A 80 78 75 73 B 60 54 C 53 53 40 37 D Percent of Samples Below Threshold 20 0 Genesee River Black Creek Oatka Creek Honeoye Creek Conesus Creek Canaseraga Creek Upper Basin Basin Watershed 8 Total Suspended Solids Total Suspended Solids 100 93 88 A 86 80 73 B 60 57 C 41 40 31 D Percent of Samples Below Threshold 20 0 Genesee River Basin Black Creek Oatka Creek Honeoye Creek Conesus Creek Canaseraga Creek Upper Basin Watershed 9 Use data based upon NYSDEC assessments 10 Water Quality Assessments • Waterbody Inventory and Priority Waterbody List – Regular, routine assessments of water resources and their ability to support specific uses – Used by NYSDEC to: • Focus Water Division program activities • Provide a consistent and objective inventory • Record water quality history • Measure progress towards water quality improvement 11 Assessment Categories • Impaired Waters – Well documented water quality problems that result in precluded or impaired uses • Minor Impacts – Less severe water quality impacts are apparent but uses are considered fully supported • Threatened – Uses are not restricted and no water quality problems exist but land use or other changes in the surrounding watershed are known or suspected of threatening water quality 12 Assessment Categories • Needs Verification – Thought to have water quality problems or impacts but for which there is insufficient documentation. • No Known Impacts – Monitoring data and information indicate that there are no restrictions to overall use. • Unassessed – There is insufficient water quality information to assess support of designated uses 13 Use Data • Genesee RiverWatch definitions derived from NYSDEC Waterbody Assessments – Supports Use – Percent of segments that are identified as Minor, Threatened, and No Known Impacts – Well Known – Percent of segments that are identifies as Needs Verification plus those identified as Supports Use 14 Number of Segments Needs No Known Total Watershed Sub-Waterhed Impaired Verification Unassessed Minor Threatened Impacts Segments Lower/Middle Lower River (307) 2 0 3 2 0 0 7 Beards Creek (305) 1 1 8 3 1 1 15 Conesus Lake (301) 1 0 3 1 0 2 7 Silver Lake (210) 1 0 6 1 2 0 10 Black Creek Black Creek (306) 6 1 1 1 0 2 11 Oatka Creek Oatka Creek (304) 2 0 3 3 0 2 10 Honeoye Creek Lower Honeoye (303) 0 1 2 3 0 0 6 Upper Honeoye (302) 2 3 6 1 3 2 17 Canaseraga Creek Canaseraga Creek (209) 0 6 8 1 1 7 23 Upper Cold Water Creek (208) 0 1 5 0 0 1 7 Wiscoy Creek (207) 0 2 3 1 0 2 8 Caneadea Creek (206) 1 3 4 0 3 1 12 VanCampen Creek (205) 2 1 0 2 0 5 10 Angelica Creek (204) 0 0 0 1 0 2 3 Cryder Creek (203) 0 1 2 0 0 5 8 Dyke Creek (202) 1 0 0 0 0 3 4 19 20 54 20 10 35 158 Number Use Impacts Percent 65 Supports Use: Minor + Threatened + No Known Impacts 43 84 Well Known: Impaired + Supports use 56 15 Supports Use Supports Use 100 A 80 B 60 50 50 C 43 41 39 39 40 Percent of Segments D 27 20 0 Genesee River Basin` Black Creek Oatka Creek Honeoye Creek Conesus Creek Canaseraga Creek Upper Basin Watershed 16 Well Known/Understood 17 Report Card 18 Way Forward • NYS Department of Environmental Conservation – Continue regulation of CAFOs and wastewater treatment plants, plus adopt water quality standard for total phosphorus in moving water • Soil & Water Conservation Districts – Encourage adoption of AEM and assist with implementation of BMPs • Municipalities – Monitor septic systems, install green infrastructure when possible, enforce sediment and erosion control practices 19 Way Forward • Farmers – Implement BMPs when possible and enroll in AEM with local S&WCD • Citizen and Stakeholder Groups – Support DEC, municipalities, and S&WCD efforts to improve water quality – Implement best practices identified by H2O Hero program – Join or start a local watershed group 20 Way Forward • Genesee RiverWatch will continue to: – Inform and educate public to increase their knowledge of the river and the issues is faces; – Monitor water quality via Citizen Monitoring program; – Restore eroded streambanks based upon our Sediment/Nutrient Reduction Plan – Connect people to river via events and map – Collaborate with Basin stakeholders 21 Contact Information George Thomas, Executive Director 700 West Metro Park Rochester, New York 14623 585-233-6086 Email: [email protected] Web: www.geneseeriverwatch.org 22.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Genesee Valley Greenway State Park Management Plan Existing
    Genesee Valley Greenway State Park Management Plan Part 2 – Existing Conditions and Background Information Part 2 Existing Conditions and Background Information Page 45 Genesee Valley Greenway State Park Management Plan Part 2 – Existing Conditions and Background Information Existing Conditions Physical Resources Bedrock Geology From Rochester heading south to Cuba and Hinsdale Silurian Akron Dolostone, Cobleskill Limestone and Salina Group Akron dolostone Camillus Shale Vernon Formation Devonian Onondaga Limestone and Tri-states Group Onondaga Limestone Hamilton Group Marcellus Formation Skaneatleles Formation Ludlowville Formation Sonyea Group Cashaqua Shale Genesee Group and Tully Limestone West River Shale West Falls Group Lower Beers Hill West Hill Formation Nunda Formation Java Group Hanover Shale Canadaway Group Machias Formation Conneaut Group Ellicot Formation Page 47 Genesee Valley Greenway State Park Management Plan Part 2 – Existing Conditions and Background Information Soils As much of the Greenway follows the route of the Rochester Branch of the Pennsylvania Railroad, major expanses of the Greenway Trail are covered with a layer of cinder and/or turf and other man-made fill. In general, the soils underneath the Greenway tend to be gravelly or silty clay loam. The entire trail is fairly level, with the majority of slopes being less than five percent. A complete, narrative description of the soils can be found in Appendix F Natural Resources Flora A complete biological inventory of Greenway property is not presently available (October 2013). However, SUNY Geneseo botany students began to inventory flora within sections of the corridor. The New York State Natural Heritage Program has targeted the GVG for a Natural Heritage inventory in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Ontario Maps, Facts and Figures
    Lake Ontario maps, facts and figures A project by the FINGER LAKES-LAKE ONTARIO WATERSHED PROTECTION ALLIANCE and NEW YORK SEA GRANT 1. Origins of Lake Ontario Direct Drainage Basin 2. Population by Census Block Groups 3. Detailed Surface Water New York’s Lake Ontario . shown in maps, facts & figures Lake Ontario, the 14th largest lake in the world, is the smallest of the Great 4. Topography Lakes. Bordered to the north by Ontario, Canada, and to the south by New York State, it is the smallest in surface area, fourth among the Great Lakes in maximum depth, but second only to Lake Superior in average depth. The basin land area is largely rural with a significant forested and Lake Ontario at a glance 5. Land Use Types agricultural portion. The Lake is nestled between the mighty Niagara River Lake Ontario is the 14th largest lake in the world. to the west...and the picturesque St. Lawrence River Valley to its east. Length: 193 mi / 311 km Width: 53 mi / 85 km Almost one-third of the land area of New York State drains Published by Finger Lakes-Lake Ontario Watershed Protection Alliance (FLLOWPA) Average depth: 283 ft / 86 m 6. Wastewater Treatment Plants and New York Sea Grant. into Lake Ontario, making the wise use and management of Maximum depth: 802 ft / 244 m All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval natural resources vital to the long-term sustainability of the system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, 3 3 photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesee Valley Glacial and Postglacial Geology from 50000
    Genesee Valley Glacial and Postglacial Geology from 50,000 Years Ago to the Present: A Selective Annotated Review Richard A. Young, Department of Geological Sciences, SUNY, Geneseo, NY 14454 Introduction The global chronology for The Pleistocene Epoch, or “ice age,” has been significantly revised during the last three decades (Alley and Clark, 1999) as a result of the extended and more accurate data provided by deep sea drilling projects, ice core studies from Greenland and Antarctica (Andersen et al. 2006; Svensson et al. 2008), oxygen isotope studies of marine sediments, and climatic proxy data from lake cores, peat bogs, and cave stalactites. These new data have improved our ability to match the Earth’s Milankovitch orbital cycles to the improved ice core and radiometric chronologies (ages based on radiocarbon, U-Th, U-Pb). However, the Milankovitch theory has recently been the subject of renewed controversy, and not all cyclical climatic phenomena are directly reconcilable with Milankovitch’s original ideas (Ridgwell et al., 1999; Ruddiman, 2006). Overall, it is evident that there must have been as many as 20 or more glacial cycles in the last 2.5 million years, not all of which necessarily resulted in the expansion of large ice sheets as far south as the United States-Canadian border. The International Union of Geological Sciences recently adopted a change for the Pliocene-Pleistocene boundary, extending the beginning of the Pleistocene Epoch back from 1.8 to 2.588 million years Before Present (BP). The average length of the most recent glacial- interglacial cycles (also known as “Stages”) is on the order of 100,000 years, with 10,000 to 15,000 years being the approximate length of the interglacial warm episodes between the longer cold cycles (also known as cold stadials and warm interstadials).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Port of Rochester & Genesee River Harbor Management Plan
    2016 Draft Port of Rochester & Genesee River Harbor Management Plan This report was prepared with funding provided by the New York State Department of State under Title 11 of the Environmental Protection Fund. Photos provided by NYS DOS and City of Rochester Port of Rochester-Genesee River Harbor Management Plan City of Rochester, New York Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 1 1.1 PURPOSE & BENEFIT OF THE HARBOR MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................................................... 1 1.2 LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY FOR LOCAL HARBOR MANAGEMENT......................................................... 2 1.2.1 The HMP as a Component of the Local Waterfront Revitalization Program ................. 2 1.3 HARBOR MANAGEMENT AREA ................................................................................................. 3 1.3.1 Harbor Management Area ............................................................................................ 3 1.3.2 Port of Rochester and Rochester Harbor Designations ................................................. 6 1.3.3 Port Redevelopment Project .......................................................................................... 6 1.3.4 HMA Historical Context ................................................................................................. 7 1.4 PUBLIC & STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH DURING HMP PREPARATION ................................................ 15 1.4.1 Project Advisory Committee Meetings .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Management Plan for Honeoye Creek Wildlife Management Area 2017 ‐ 2026
    Habitat Management Plan for Honeoye Creek Wildlife Management Area 2017 ‐ 2026 Photo: Mike Palermo Division of Fish and Wildlife Bureau of Wildlife 6274 East Avon‐Lima Road, Avon, New York 14414 October 16, 2017 Prepared by: Michael Palermo, Biologist I (Wildlife) Emily Bonk, Forester 1 John Mahoney, Forestry Technician 1 Young Forest Initiative Dana Hilderbrant, Fish & Wildlife Technician 3 Honeoye Creek WMA Management Heidi Kennedy, Biologist 1 (Wildlife) Land Management & Habitat Conservation Team Reviewed and approved by: !(}/! 7/~d/7 Michael Wasilco, Regional Wildlife Manager Date Bureaµ of Wildlife 1 7 James F. Farquh III, Chief Date Bureau of Wildlife ny Wilkinson, Director vision of Fish and Wildlife Financial support for development ofthis Habitat Management Plan was provided by the Federal Aid in Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Program and non-federal funds administered by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation including Habitat & Access Stamp funds. llPage TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 3 I. BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION................................................................................................ 4 PURPOSE OF HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLANS ............................................................................ 4 WMA OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................... 5 LANDSCAPE
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Contour Plan 13 December 1990
    File on «>nnna X Vn» -'••=-. * Nn , SiteNamfl ^>t>V. ~Q ^flC^^.rr-" ->r».---! Site No. 0X6(3 // *- •/...• - County, L,\s,\,.rh/\ _ - •• - •• Town U/JirA '•• • •• "•• tollable £____„Yes - No Fiie Mama ' r<>f> *sf?k ^ 8J6o (I. (<t1? -/I- ./y. Scanned&fiDCfc p-&~~ WKpf**%\fi&&> M &:A ®:S IMlH:te^m m •tox kfc-J £V afl* * ST* *^J^*sa*^r ad ^J^p^^'^T^^'^^^F^^ •WS*.«Hrt .->>^-, ^y... --^,-^P->-,-^..^^Ov*.- ..w-^ J^'>."KMV-,^^ ^;^ ! : " *•*>•" - - '^-—-'•••--*'• ' FINAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN ENARC-O MACHINE PRODUCTS, INC. NYSDEC REGISTRY SITE NO. 8-26-011 LIMA, NEW YORK Prepared for: Kaddis Manufacturing Corp. 1100 Beahan Road Rochester, New York By: H&A of New York 189 N. Water Street Rochester, New York JAN 7/994 "SSr File No. 70372-40 December 1993 A9A Gaotachnlcil Englno«r« A Letter of Transmittal Environmontal Consultants To NYSDEC - Bureau of Western Remedial"Action 4 January 1994 50 Wolf Road Fil°Number 70372-40 Albany, New York 12233-7010 Subiect Enarc-O Machine Attention David Chiusano Site #826011 Copies Date Descri ption 6 12/30/93 Final RI Work Plan Enarc-O Machine Corp. Revised pages 23, 24 and Table 2 Remarks In accordance with our phone conversation and your verbal approval of the work plan, enclosed are copies as indicated above. The revised pages 23, 24 and Table 2 are for you to insert in the work plan copy we sent you last week. The six full copies already have the revisions on these pages that you had requested. Distribution of the plan with your requested revisions has been done as shown below.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Seneca
    TOWN OF BRISTOL Inventory of Land Use and Land Cover Prepared for: Ontario County Water Resources Council 20 Ontario Street, 3rd Floor Canandaigua, New York 14424 and Town of Bristol 6740 County Road 32 Canandaigua, New York 14424 Prepared by: Dr. Bruce Gilman Department of Environmental Conservation and Horticulture Finger Lakes Community College 3325 Marvin Sands Drive Canandaigua, New York 14424-8395 2020 Cover image: Ground level view of a perched swamp white oak forest community (S1S2) surrounding a shrub swamp that was discovered and documented on Johnson Hill north of Dugway Road. This forest community type is rare statewide and extremely rare locally, and harbors a unique assemblage of uncommon plant species. (Image by the Bruce Gilman). Acknowledgments: For over a decade, the Ontario County Planning Department has supported a working partnership between local towns and the Department of Environmental Conservation and Horticulture at Finger Lakes Community College that involves field research, ground truthing and digital mapping of natural land cover and cultural land use patterns. Previous studies have been completed for the Canandaigua Lake watershed, the southern Honeoye Valley, the Honeoye Lake watershed, the complete Towns of Canandaigua, Gorham, Richmond and Victor, and the woodlots, wetlands and riparian corridors in the Towns of Seneca, Phelps and Geneva. This report summarizes the latest land use/land cover study conducted in the Town of Bristol. The final report would not have been completed without the vital assistance of Terry Saxby of the Ontario County Planning Department. He is gratefully thanked for his assistance with landowner information, his patience as the fieldwork was slowly completed, and his noteworthy help transcribing the field maps to geographic information system (GIS) shape files.
    [Show full text]
  • NY State Highway Bridge Data: August 31, 2021
    NY State Highway Bridge Data: August 31, 2021 Allegany County Year Date BIN Built or of Last Poor Region County Municipality Location Feature Carried Feature Crossed Owner Replaced Inspectio Status n 06 Allegany Alfred (Town) 1016280 1.1 MI S JCT SR21 & SR244 21 21 61011075 EAST VALLEY CREEK NYSDOT 2004 09/08/2020 N 06 Allegany Alfred (Town) 1016300 0.1 MI S JCT RTS 21 & 244 21 21 61011088 CANACADEA CREEK NYSDOT 1986 04/07/2021 N 06 Allegany Alfred (Town) 1016270 3.0 MI N JCT 417 & 21 21 21 61011030 RAILROAD BROOK NYSDOT 1986 07/02/2019 N 06 Allegany Alfred (Town) 3357650 4.2 MI SW OF ALFRED CR12 ELM VAL RD TRIB ELM VALLEY C 30 - County 1973 08/12/2020 N 06 Allegany Alfred (Town) 2254600 1.7 MI E OF ALFRED EAST VALLEY ROAD EAST VALLEY CREEK 40 - Town 1970 08/12/2020 Y 06 Allegany Alfred (Town) 2213730 1.1 MI S ALFRED STATION EAST VALLEY ROAD EAST VALLEY CREEK 40 - Town 1970 03/31/2020 N 06 Allegany Alfred (Town) 2213720 3.1 MI NE OF ANDOVER EAST VALLEY ROAD EAST VALLEY CREEK 40 - Town 1970 07/29/2020 N 06 Allegany Alfred (Town) 3330730 2.6 MI N.W. OF ALFRED MC HENRY ROAD MC HENRY CREEK 30 - County 1980 07/17/2019 N 06 Allegany Alfred (Town) 2213710 1.0 MI S ALFRED STATION PLEASANT VALLEY R PLEASANT VALLEY C 40 - Town 1984 03/26/2020 N 06 Allegany Alfred (Village) 1049720 IN ALFRED 960B960B61011003 TRB CANACADEA CRK NYSDOT 1976 04/03/2020 N 06 Allegany Alfred (Village) 2255080 IN ALFRED ELM STREET TRB CANACADEA CRK 41 - Village 1976 05/13/2021 Y 06 Allegany Alfred (Village) 2329770 IN ALFRED PINE STREET CANACADEA CREEK 40 - Town 1961 05/13/2021
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Devonian Depositional and Biotic Events in Western New York
    MIDDLE- UPPER DEVONIAN DEPOSITIONAL AND BIOTIC EVENTS IN WESTERN NEW YORK Gordon C. Baird, Dept. of Geosciences, SUNY-Fredonia, Fredonia, NY 14063; D. Jeffrey Over, Dept. of Geological Sciences, SUNY-Geneseo, Geneseo, NY 14454; William T. Kirch gasser, Dept. of Geology, SUNY-Potsdam, Potsdam, NY 13676; Carlton E. Brett, Dept. of Geology, Univ. of Cincinnati, 500 Geology/Physics Bldg., Cincinnati, OH 45221 INTRODUCTION The Middle and Late Devonian succession in the Buffalo area includes numerous dark gray and black shale units recording dysoxic to near anoxic marine substrate conditions near the northern margin of the subsiding Appalachian foreland basin. Contrary to common perception, this basin was often not stagnant; evidence of current activity and episodic oxygenation events are characteristic of many units. In fact, lag deposits of detrital pyrite roofed by black shale, erosional runnels, and cross stratified deposits of tractional styliolinid grainstone present a counter intuitive image of episodic, moderate to high energy events within the basin. We will discuss current-generated features observed at field stops in the context of proposed models for their genesis, and we will also examine several key Late Devonian bioevents recorded in the Upper Devonian stratigraphic succession. In particular, two stops will showcase strata associated with key Late Devonian extinction events including the Frasnian-Famennian global crisis. Key discoveries made in the preparation of this field trip publication, not recorded in earlier literature,
    [Show full text]
  • The Lost City of Tryon Trail Is an Approved Historic Trail Of
    The Lost City of Tryon Trail is an approved Historic Trail of the Boy Scouts of America and is administered by the Seneca Waterways Council Scouting Historical Society. It offers hikers a fantastic opportunity to experience a geographic location of enduring historic significance in Upstate New York. 2018 EDITION Seneca Waterways Council Scouting Historical Society 2320 Brighton-Henrietta Town Line Road, Rochester, NY 14623 version 2.0 rdc 10/2018 A Nice Hike For Any Season Introduction The Irondequoit Bay area was once at the crossroads of travel and commerce for Native Americans. It was the home of the Algonquin and later the Seneca, visited by a plethora of famous explorers, soldiers, missionaries and pioneers. This guidebook provides only a small glimpse of the wonders of this remote wilderness prior to 1830. The Lost City of Tryon Trail takes you through a historic section of Brighton, New York, in Monroe County’s Ellison Park. The trail highlights some of the remnants of the former City of Tryon (portions of which were located within the present park) as well as other historic sites. It was also the location of the southernmost navigable terminus of Irondequoit Creek via Irondequoit Bay, more commonly known as “The Landing.” The starting and ending points are at the parking lot on North Landing Road, opposite the house at #225. Use of the Trail The Lost City of Tryon Trail is located within Ellison Park and is open for use in accordance with park rules and regulations. Seasonal recreation facilities, water, and comfort stations are available. See the park’s page on the Monroe County, NY website for additional information.
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Council Trout Unlimited
    New York State Council Trout Unlimited Our mission is “To conserve, protect, restore and sustain New York coldwater fisheries and their watersheds, especially our wild trout resources” We restore streams through habitat improvement projects, conduct seminars on water quality and fisheries management, and work to educate the next generation about the importance of clean water and wild trout. Trout Unlimited NY • 8,000 members • 31 chapters Trout Unlimited Chapters in the Genesee Basin • 5 chapters in the Genesee Basin • 1,000 members http://tu-newyorkcouncil.org/ 1 New York State Council Regions Map Region 6 Vice President Paul Miller Region 7 Vice President Region 5 Vice President Open Position Rich Redman Region 9 Vice President Chuck Godfrey Region 4 Vice President Vince Dubois Region 8 Vice President Region 1 Vice President Jim Palmer George Costa Region 3 Vice President Bill Shaw Region 2 Vice President Roger Olsen http://tu-newyorkcouncil.org/ New York State Council Trout Unlimited Executive Team Chairman Larry Charette Conservation Fund Treasurer NLC Secretary Chairman Vice Chair Scott Seidman Mike Mowins Jeff Plackis Dave Savko William Strugatz Region 1 Vice President Region 2 Vice President Region 3 Vice President Region 4 Vice President Region 5 Vice President George Costa Roger Olson Bill Shaw Vince Dubois Rich Redman Chairman Region 6 Vice President Region 8 Vice President Region 9 Vice President Fisheries Enhancement Region 7 Vice President Paul Miller Jim Palmer Chuck Godfrey Fund Committee Don Keiffer Resource Management
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Rochester Storm Sewers on the Water Quality of the Lower Genesee River: a Modeling Approach Using PCSWMM
    The College at Brockport: State University of New York Digital Commons @Brockport Environmental Science and Biology Theses Environmental Science and Biology Spring 2014 The mpI act of Rochester Storm Sewers on the Water Quality of the Lower Genesee River: A Modeling Approach Using PCSWMM Lindsay Dressel The College at Brockport, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/env_theses Part of the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Dressel, Lindsay, "The mpI act of Rochester Storm Sewers on the Water Quality of the Lower Genesee River: A Modeling Approach Using PCSWMM" (2014). Environmental Science and Biology Theses. Paper 89. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Environmental Science and Biology at Digital Commons @Brockport. It has been accepted for inclusion in Environmental Science and Biology Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @Brockport. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The impact of Rochester storm sewers on the water quality of the lower Genesee River: a modeling approach using PCSWMM by Lindsay Dressel A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Department on Environmental Science and Biology of the College at Brockport, State University of New York in partial fulfillment for the degree of Master of Science May 2014 Acknowledgements I would first and foremost like to thank the United States Department of Agriculture for funding this project, and my advisor Dr. Makarewicz for allowing me to be a part of this work and for his continued guidance, suggestions, and time dedicated to reading and editing my thesis.
    [Show full text]