Prussian Education System

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prussian Education System Prussian education system The Prussian education system refers to the system of education established in Prussia as a result of educational reforms in the late 18th and early 19th century, which has had widespread influence since. It is predominantly used as an American political slogan in educational reform debates, since it was adopted by all American K–12 public schools and major universities as early as the late 18th century, and is often used as a derogatory term for education in the service of nation-building, teaching children and young adults blind obedience to authority, and reinforcing class and race prejudice.[1] The actual Prussian education system was introduced as a basic concept in the late 18th century and was significantly enhanced after Prussia's defeat in the early stages of the Napoleonic Wars. The Prussian educational reforms inspired other countries and remains important as a biopower in the Foucaultian sense for nation-building.[2] Compulsory education on the Prussian example was soon mirrored in Scandinavia, and United States started to adopt the Prussian example. Early American adopters include Daniel Coit Gilman, who set up The General Education Board, later renamed The Rockefeller Foundation, and first president of Johns Hopkins, John Dewey at the University of Chicago, James McKeen Cattell at The University of Pennsylvania and Columbia University, Henry Philip Tappan at The University of Michigan, James Earl Russell at the New York College for the Training of Teachers, and many more. France and the UK failed to introduce similar systems until the 1880s. Johann Julius Hecker memorial in The term itself is not used in German literature, which refers to the primary aspects Berlin honors him founding the first prussian teachers seminary in 1748, of the Humboldtian education ideal respectively as the Prussian reforms; however, Heckers bust thrones over a future the basic concept remains fruitful and has led to various debates and controversies. teacher in classical regalia and Twenty-first century primary and secondary education in Germany and beyond still posture embodies the legacy of the Prussian education system. Contents Origin Outreach Drivers and hindrances Interaction with the German national movement Interaction with religion School Museum in Reckahn, Political and cultural role of teachers Brandenburg an der Havel quoting Mark 10:14 at the entrance. Founded Spread to other countries by Friedrich Eberhard von Rochow in Examples 1773, Reckahn was the firstone- United States room school with two age-related Policy borrowing and exchange classes in Prussia. Drill and serfdom Legacy of the Prussian system after the end of the monarchy Legacy of the Prussian System after 1945 Current debates referring to the Prussian legacy References Further reading Primary sources Origin The basic foundations of a generic Prussian primary education system were laid out by Frederick the Great with his Generallandschulreglement, a decree of 1763, authored by Johann Julius Hecker. Hecker had already before (in 1748) founded the first teacher's seminary in Prussia. His concept of providing teachers with the means to cultivate mulberries for homespun silk, which was one of Frederick's favorite projects, found the King's favour.[3] It expanded the existing schooling system significantly and required that all young citizens, both girls and boys, be educated by mainly municipality-funded schools from the age of 5 to 13 or 14. Prussia was among the first countries in the world to introduce tax-funded and generally compulsory primary education.[4] In comparison, in France and Great Britain, compulsory schooling was not successfully enacted until the 1880s.[5] The Prussian system consisted of an eight-year course of primary education, called Volksschule. It provided not only basic technical skills needed in a modernizing world (such as reading and writing), but also music (singing) and religious (Christian) education in close cooperation with the churches and tried to impose a strict ethos of duty, sobriety and discipline. Mathematics and calculus were not compulsory at the start and taking such courses required additional payment by parents. Frederick the Great also formalized further educational stages, the Realschule and as the highest stage the gymnasium (state-funded secondary school), which served as a university-preparatory school.[6] Construction of schools received some state support, but they were often built on Bruns-Memorial in Reckahn, "He was private initiative. Friedrich Eberhard von Rochow, a member of the local gentry and a teacher" former cavalry officer in Reckahn, Brandenburg, installed such a school. Von Rochow cooperated with Heinrich Julius Bruns (1746–1794), a talented teacher of modest background. The two installed a model school for rural education that attracted more than 1,200 notable visitors between 1777 and 1794.[7] The Prussian system, after its modest beginnings, succeeded in reaching compulsory attendance, specific training for teachers, national testing for all students (of both genders), a prescribed national curriculum for each grade and mandatory kindergarten.[8] Training of teachers was increasingly organized via private seminaries. Hecker had already in 1748 founded the first "Lehrerseminar", but the density and impact of the seminary system improving significantly until the end of the 18th century.[9] In 1810, Prussia introduced state certification requirements for teachers, which significantly raised the standard of teaching.[10] The final examination, Abitur, was introduced in 1788, implemented in all Prussian secondary schools by 1812 and extended to all of Germany in 1871. Passing the Abitur was a prerequisite to entering the learned professions and higher echelons of the civil service. The state-controlled Abitur remains in place in modern Germany. The Prussian system had by the 1830s attained the following characteristics:[11] Free primary schooling, at least for poor citizens Professional teachers trained in specialized colleges A basic salary for teachers and recognition of teaching as a profession An extended school year to better involve children of farmers Funding to build schools Supervision at national and classroom level to ensure quality instruction Curriculum inculcating a strong national identity, involvement of science and technology Secular instruction (but with religion as a topic included in the curriculum) Outreach The overall system was soon widely admired for its efficiency and reduction of illiteracy, and served as a model for the education systems in other German states and a number of other countries, includingJapan and the United States.[12] The underlying Humboldtian educational ideal of brothers Alexander and Wilhelm von Humboldt was about much more than primary education; it strived for academic freedom and the education of both cosmopolitan-minded and loyal citizens from the earliest levels. The Prussian system had strong backing in the traditional German admiration and respect for Bildung as an individual's drive to cultivate oneself from within.[13] Drivers and hindrances Major drivers for improved education in Prussia since the 18th century had a background in the middle and upper middle strata of society and were pioneered by the Bildungsbürgertum. The concept as such faced strong resistance both from the top, as major players in the ruling nobility feared increasing literacy among peasants and workers would raise unrest, and from the very poor, who preferred to use their children as early as possible for rural or industrial labor.[3] The system's proponents overcame such resistance with the help of foreign pressure and internal failures, after the defeat of Prussia in the early stages of the Napoleonic Collegium Fridericianum in Königsberg Wars. After the military blunder of Prussian drill andline formation against the levée en masse of the French revolutionary army in the Battle of Jena–Auerstedt in 1806, reformers and German nationalists urged for major improvements in education. In 1809 Wilhelm von Humboldt, having been appointed minister of education, promoted his idea of a generic education based on a neohumanist ideal of broad general knowledge, in full academic freedom without any determination or restriction by status, profession or wealth. Humboldt's de:Königsberger Schulplan was one of the earliest white papers to lay out a reform of a country's educational system as a whole.[14] Humboldt's concept still forms the foundation of the contemporary German education system.[15] The Prussian system provided compulsory and basic schooling for everyone, but the significantly higher fees for attending gymnasium or a university imposed a high barrier between upper social strata and middle and lower social strata.[16] Interaction with the German national movement In 1807 Johann Gottlieb Fichte had urged a new form of education in his Addresses to the German Nation. While Prussian (military) drill in the times before had been about obedience to orders without any leeway, Fichte asked for shaping of the personality of students: ""[17] The citizens should be made able and willing to use their own minds to achieve higher goals in the framework of a future unified German nation state.[18] Fichte and other philosophers, such as the Brothers Grimm, tried to circumvent the nobility's resistance to a common German nation state via proposing the concept of a Kulturnation, nationhood without needing a state but based on a common language, musical compositions
Recommended publications
  • Stichwortdatei
    Stichwortdatei 7.1 Universität und einzelne Wissenschaftsdisziplinen, Studienvorbereitung, Studierfähig- keit, wissenschaftliche Grundbildung, Akademien 1506‒1650 1506 Wallner Julius: Geschichte des Convictes zu Olmütz von der Gründung bis zur Vereinigung mit der k.k.There- sianischen Akademie in Wien (1506–1782), Brünn 1902 1543 Flathe, Theodor: St.Afra, Geschichte der Fürstenschule zu Meißen (1543), Leipzig 1879 1550 Tönnies, Paul: Die Fakultätsstudien zu Düsseldorf von der Mitte des XVI. bis zum Anfang des XIX,Jahrhun- derts (1550). Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Unterrichtswesens in Jülich–Berg (2 Teile), Düsseldorf 1884/1887 *Die Fakultätsstudien waren Aufgabe des akademischen Gymnasiums, das selbständig war und Fakultätscharak- ter hatte im Blick auf die Studienfächer Philosophie, Jura, Medizin* 1580 Hümmer, Friedrich Carl: Das von Erzbischof Julius gestiftete Seminarium Nobilium zu Würzburg (1580), Würz- burg 1905 1620 Dornavi, Caspar: Ulysses scholasticos S. de erroribus qui in scholis trivialibus admittuntur, Hannovae 1620 bei Negelein, J. Ulisses .... litterata, Norimbergae 1726 beygedruckt S.61ff. *Über die Fehler, die bei der Unterrich- ung der Fächer des Triviums gemacht werden* [W.H. Das Trivium: Grammatik, Rhetorik und Dialektik waren zunächst Gegenstand des Unterrichts in den Kloster– und Lateinschulen, wurden später Aufgabe der Artistenfakul- tät in den Universitäten] 1622 Clapmari, Arnoldi: Nobile Triennium. Quomodo Studiosus humaniorum litterarum triennio Animam juste ac Sermonem feliciter excolere possit, Giessae 1622
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms International 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 USA St
    EDUCATION IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FRENCH AND ENGLISH PERIODICALS (1700-1789) Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Varney, Marsha Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 05/10/2021 17:11:32 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/298873 INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upcn the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Vocational Education and Training in Europe
    04 05 16 TI-68-05-769-EN-C This investigation forms part of the project entitled ‘A European History of Vocational Education and Training’ launched by the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, which has so far consisted of a conference held in 2002 and an exhibition. The book contains an overview of the historical development of mass vocational training in Europe during the 19th century — as distinct from academic education. The second half comprises a historical analysis of the three ‘classic’ training systems in England, France and Germany in the first half of the 20th century. Mass vocational education and training in Europe Classical models of the 19th century and training in England, France and Germany during the first half of the 20th Mass vocational education and training in Europe Classical models of the 19th century and training in England, France and Germany during the first half of the 20th European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training Europe 123, GR-570 01 Thessaloniki (Pylea) Postal address: PO Box 22427, GR-551 02 Thessaloniki Tel. (30) 23 10 49 01 11, Fax (30) 23 10 49 00 20 E-mail: [email protected] Homepage: www.cedefop.eu.int Interactive website: www.trainingvillage.gr Free of charge – On request from Cedefop 5157 EN ISBN 92-896-0417-4 EN Mass vocational education and training in Europe Classical models of the 19th century and training in England, France and Germany during the first half of the 20th Wolf-Dietrich Greinert Cedefop Panorama series; 118 Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2005 A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • 445 Copyright © 2019 by Academic Publishing House Researcher S.R.O
    European Journal of Contemporary Education, 2019, 8(2) Copyright © 2019 by Academic Publishing House Researcher s.r.o. All rights reserved. Published in the Slovak Republic European Journal of Contemporary Education E-ISSN 2305-6746 2019, 8(2): 445-453 DOI: 10.13187/ejced.2019.2.445 www.ejournal1.com WARNING! Article copyright. Copying, reproduction, distribution, republication (in whole or in part), or otherwise commercial use of the violation of the author(s) rights will be pursued on the basis of international legislation. Using the hyperlinks to the article is not considered a violation of copyright. The German System of Public Education in the Period between the 15th and early 20th centuries. Part 1 Anvar M. Mamadaliev a , b , *, Sergey D. Ludwig c, Natal'ya V. Miku d, Aude Médico e a International Network Center for Fundamental and Applied Research, Washington, USA b Volgograd State University, Volgograd, Russian Federation c Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Russian Federation d Penza State University of Architecture and Construction, Penza, Russian Federation e University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract This paper explores the origins of the German public education system. This part of the work provides an analysis of the formation process of the German primary education system between the 15th and 18th centuries. Also, this paper explores the use of philosophical approaches in German education, and examines the impact of Protestantism on the process of creation of the German primary education system. The study is grounded on a body of related research and special literature. In effect, its methodological basis is based on the principles of historicism, research objectivity, and systemicity, which are traditional in historiography.
    [Show full text]
  • Scholars, Travelers, and Religious People: the Reach of the Curiosity Cabinet at the Pietist Francke Foundations in Halle
    H-Ideas Scholars, Travelers, and Religious People: The Reach of the Curiosity Cabinet at the Pietist Francke Foundations in Halle Blog Post published by Anja-Silvia Goeing on Wednesday, August 29, 2018 Blog Post Author: Anja-Silvia Goeing Image 1: Gottfried August Gründler: Die Franckeschen Stiftungen zu Halle, 1749 Copper engraving, physical location unknown. Licence: Public Domain https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Franckesche_Stiftungen_1749.jpg (accessed August 29, 2018) In the wake of the revival of the Francke Foundations in Halle on the Saale in 1992, a town close to Berlin in the former East Germany, the curiosity cabinet of the pietist school and orphanage was restored. In the 18th century, the Francke Citation: Anja-Silvia Goeing. Scholars, Travelers, and Religious People: The Reach of the Curiosity Cabinet at the Pietist Francke Foundations in Halle. H-Ideas. 08-29-2018. https://networks.h-net.org/node/6873/blog/2282946/scholars-travelers-and-religious-people-reach-curiosity-cabinet-pietist Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-Ideas Foundations comprised a conglomerate of schools for students of all abilities and social backgrounds. Image 2: Gottfried August Gründler: The Historic Orphanage of the Franckeschen Stiftungen zu Halle, 1749 Copper engraving, physical location unknown. Licence: Public Domain https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:FranckescheStiftungen_3.jpg (accessed August 29, 2018) The room that contains the collection, in fact, the attic of the Orphanage, is now in a state similar to that of about 1741, when it was set up with beautifully decorated display cabinets (Müller-Bahlke, 1997, 1998, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • “Das Schulwesen Aber Ist Und Bleibet Allezeit Ein Politicum”: the Felbiger General School Ordinance and School Reform in the Eighteenth-Century Habsburg Monarchy
    2 “Das Schulwesen aber ist und bleibet allezeit ein politicum”: The Felbiger General School Ordinance and School Reform in the Eighteenth-Century Habsburg Monarchy Martin Viehhauser On December 6, 1774, Austrian Empress Maria Teresa signed a school act that made elementary schooling compulsory for all children from age six to twelve in the hereditary lands of the Habsburg Empire. Te school act, consisting of 24 paragraphs, became known as Allgemeine Schulordnung (General School Ordinance) and was mainly formulated by Johann Ignaz Felbiger (1724–1788), a Catholic abbot from Silesia, a region of mixed Catholic and Protestant creeds that was conquered by Prussia in the mid-eighteenth century.1 Te ordinance’s core con- cern was frst and foremost the literacy of the people. Reading, writ- ing, arithmetic, and, of course, religious education were among the main subjects to be taught, with additional subjects for city schools. However, at the same time—and when observed within the contempo- rary historical context—the school act was a tool to integrate the diverse dominions of the empire into one political sphere. From the perspec- tive of state-building, which in this chapter will be the main framework for my interpretation of the ordinance, the school act helped to limit M. Viehhauser (*) Fribourg University of Teacher Education, Fribourg, Switzerland e-mail: [email protected] © Te Author(s) 2019 17 J. Westberg et al. (eds.), School Acts and the Rise of Mass Schooling, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13570-6_2 18 M. Viehhauser the political infuence of the Catholic Church and to install a political system via the institutionalization of public elementary schooling.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis-1958R-H595f.Pdf (5.883Mb)
    Name:. Geral d B. Heusel Date of Degree: August 2, 195G Institution: Oklahoma State University Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma Title of Study : A FORM OF PERSONNEL ORGANIZATION I N A WOODWORKING SHOP Pages in Study: 40 Candidate for Degree of Master of Science Wajor Field : Industrial Arts Purpose of the Report: This report has been developed by the writer in order to facilitate a better organization and to present thls as a guide for others to follow in organizing the personnel in a wood­ working shop so as to reduce the many administrative duties and reports that does not allow the instructor sufficient time to teach successfully. Conclusions: This organizational plan contributes directly to increased educational values in Industrial Arts subjects. This type of plan develops cooperation in working together for the common good of all and it familiarizes the student with the type of or~anization t hat is commonly used in industrial plant management. The student learns to respect authority and to understand the problems that the employer and employee face in real life situations. It should eliminate most disciplinary problems, waste of time, waste of materials, loss of tools, and help to develop in the student, a habit of order, system, neatness, and responsibility. This report contains a list of de­ tailed duties of each officer, Superintendent, Assistant Superin­ tendent, Tool Cabinet Foreman, Safety Engineer, Material Foreman, Finishing Room Foreme.n ., in t he organization with an explanation a s to how each fits into the pl an. It tends to be democratic i n f unc­ t i on and principle a.s well a.s developi ng l eader shi p and furnishing good charact er traini ne; .
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Education for Nevada Homeschools
    School, Education, Homeschooling and Nevada Frank Schnorbus Nevada Homeschool Network, Chair March 25, 2010 1 Ecclesiastes 1:9 – 11 What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun. Is there anything of which one can say, “Look! This is something new”? It was here already, long ago; it was here before our Fme. There is no remembrance of men of old, and even those who are yet to come will not be remembered by those who follow. Proverbs 4:1 – 5 Listen, my sons, to a father’s instruction; pay attention and gain understanding. I give you sound learning, so do not forsake my teaching. When I was a boy in my father’s house, still tender, and an only child of my mother, he taught me and said, Lay hold of my words with all your heart; keep my commands and you will live. Get wisdom, get understanding; do not forget my words or swerve from them. 2 Pinky: “Gee, Brain, what do you want to do tonight?” The Brain: “The same thing we do every night, Pinky – try to take over the world!” ARE YOU PONDERING WHAT I’M PONDERING? Why do YOU educate your child? Who knows your child best? Where do parental rights fit in? Why can’t homeschoolers be leI alone? What does the word “educate” mean to you? Whose business is your child’s educaLon? Why should educaLng a child take a “professional”? What is the difference between educaLon and school? Why wouldn’t “professionals” appreciate homeschooling? What is the state’s interest in seeing that children are educated? When will homeschooling be “safe” from restricLve laws? Why do homeschoolers do beOer than other types of schools? What does the word “beOer” mean? Would it maOer if homeschoolers didn’t do beOer? What about parents who don’t educate their children? What did previous American generaLons do? Wasn’t school always the way it is today? Who is ulLmately responsible for your child’s educaLon? Will educaLon as we know it today ever change? Why is it important for homeschoolers to be vigilant? 3 (Courtesy of Dr.
    [Show full text]