DOCSLIB.ORG

Upper Lake – Nice Area Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Upper Lake – Nice Area Plan DRAFT Upper Lake – Nice Area Plan County of Lake - California DRAFT Acknowledgements Lake County Board of Supervisors R. W. Bill Merriman Chairman, District V Ed Robey Vice-Chairman, District I Karan Mackey District IV Gary Lewis District III Jeff Smith District II Planning Commission Gil Schoux Chairman, District V Peggy McCloud District IV Oliver Wright District III Gary Briggs District II Frieda Camotta District I Lake County Community Development Department Daniel Obermeyer Community Development Director Richard Coel Associate Planner, Project Coordinator Lon Sharp GIS Specialist With the assistance of the Upper Lake - Nice Area Planning Advisory Committee: Louise Talley, Chair John Hancock Marvin Butler, Vice Chairman Eric Hicks Tom Carlton Margie Levandowski Donald Clay Merl Miller Judy Cox May Noble Morrell Fitch Tony Oliveira Byron Green Robert Quitiquit Deborah Hablitzel John Ryan Graphic Credits: All graphics and Maps produced by Lon Sharp. Cover photo obtained from the Lake County Museum. All other photos by Richard Coel ULNAP/Executive Summary/Draft i DRAFT Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary.................................................................................................................. 1-1 2.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................... 1-1 2.1 The Planning Process ........................................................................................................................2-1 The Function of an Area Plan ...................................................................................................................................2-1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................................2-1 Focus.....................................................................................................................................................................2-1 Organization.........................................................................................................................................................2-1 Methodology .............................................................................................................................................................2-4 Plan Preparation ...................................................................................................................................................2-4 Citizen Participation.............................................................................................................................................2-4 Process..................................................................................................................................................................2-4 Relationship to Other Plans.......................................................................................................................................2-4 2.2 Orientation to the Planning Area.....................................................................................................2-6 Climate and Geology.................................................................................................................................................2-6 Climate .................................................................................................................................................................2-6 Regional Geology.................................................................................................................................................2-7 Planning Area Geology ........................................................................................................................................2-7 2.3 History and Development .................................................................................................................2-7 Prehistoric..................................................................................................................................................................2-7 Historic ......................................................................................................................................................................2-8 History of Planning Area......................................................................................................................................2-8 Present .....................................................................................................................................................................2-10 Future.......................................................................................................................................................................2-11 Population Characteristics..................................................................................................................................2-11 Population Projections........................................................................................................................................2-11 3.0 NATURAL RESOURCES.......................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Land ......................................................................................................................................................3-1 Planning Area Geology .............................................................................................................................................3-1 Soils ...........................................................................................................................................................................3-1 3.2 Water ..................................................................................................................................................3-4 Surface Water............................................................................................................................................................3-4 Ground Water............................................................................................................................................................3-4 3.3 Life.......................................................................................................................................................3-5 Vegetation .................................................................................................................................................................3-5 Wildlife......................................................................................................................................................................3-6 Rare, threatened and Endangered Plants and Animals ........................................................................................3-6 3.4 Resources............................................................................................................................................3-9 Development .............................................................................................................................................................3-9 Agriculture............................................................................................................................................................3-9 Mineral ...............................................................................................................................................................3-13 Conservation............................................................................................................................................................3-14 Cultural...............................................................................................................................................................3-14 Scenic Corridors.................................................................................................................................................3-16 Critical Resources...............................................................................................................................................3-20 4.0 PUBLIC SAFETY ...................................................................................................................... 4-1 ULNAP/Executive Summary/Draft ii DRAFT 4.1 Land ....................................................................................................................................................4-1 4.2 Water ..................................................................................................................................................4-3 4.3 Life.......................................................................................................................................................4-9 Wildfire......................................................................................................................................................................4-9 4.4 Human ..............................................................................................................................................4-13 Air Quality...............................................................................................................................................................4-13 Noise........................................................................................................................................................................4-17
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake County Water Inventory and Analysis Final
    In Cooperation with the California Department of Water Resources, Northern District Lake County Water Inventory and Analysis Final March 2006 Lake County Watershed Protection District Lake County Water Inventory and Analysis March 2006 Final Contents Section 1 Introduction 1.1 Lake County Watershed Protection District.........................................................1-1 1.2 Inventory and Analysis Purpose............................................................................1-2 1.3 Inventory Unit Development..................................................................................1-2 1.4 Document Contents..................................................................................................1-3 Section 2 Physical Setting 2.1 Topography ...............................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Climate .......................................................................................................................2-2 2.2.1 Temperature...............................................................................................2-2 2.2.2 Precipitation ...............................................................................................2-3 2.3 Surface Water Hydrology........................................................................................2-5 2.3.1 Surface Water Flows and Variability......................................................2-5 2.4 Soils...........................................................................................................................2-11
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic Control on 10Be-Derived Erosion Rates in the Garhwal Himalaya, India Dirk Scherler,1,2 Bodo Bookhagen,3 and Manfred R
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: EARTH SURFACE, VOL. 119, 1–23, doi:10.1002/2013JF002955, 2014 Tectonic control on 10Be-derived erosion rates in the Garhwal Himalaya, India Dirk Scherler,1,2 Bodo Bookhagen,3 and Manfred R. Strecker 1 Received 28 August 2013; revised 13 November 2013; accepted 26 November 2013. [1] Erosion in the Himalaya is responsible for one of the greatest mass redistributions on Earth and has fueled models of feedback loops between climate and tectonics. Although the general trends of erosion across the Himalaya are reasonably well known, the relative importance of factors controlling erosion is less well constrained. Here we present 25 10Be-derived catchment-averaged erosion rates from the Yamuna catchment in the Garhwal Himalaya, 1 northern India. Tributary erosion rates range between ~0.1 and 0.5 mm yrÀ in the Lesser 1 Himalaya and ~1 and 2 mm yrÀ in the High Himalaya, despite uniform hillslope angles. The erosion-rate data correlate with catchment-averaged values of 5 km radius relief, channel steepness indices, and specific stream power but to varying degrees of nonlinearity. Similar nonlinear relationships and coefficients of determination suggest that topographic steepness is the major control on the spatial variability of erosion and that twofold to threefold differences in annual runoff are of minor importance in this area. Instead, the spatial distribution of erosion in the study area is consistent with a tectonic model in which the rock uplift pattern is largely controlled by the shortening rate and the geometry of the Main Himalayan Thrust fault (MHT). Our data support a shallow dip of the MHT underneath the Lesser Himalaya, followed by a midcrustal ramp underneath the High Himalaya, as indicated by geophysical data.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Morphology and Bedrock River Incision: Theory, Experiments, and Application to the Eastern Himalaya
    Channel morphology and bedrock river incision: Theory, experiments, and application to the eastern Himalaya Noah J. Finnegan A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2007 Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Department of Earth and Space Sciences University of Washington Graduate School This is to certify that I have examined this copy of a doctoral dissertation by Noah J. Finnegan and have found that it is complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the final examining committee have been made. Co-Chairs of the Supervisory Committee: ___________________________________________________________ Bernard Hallet ___________________________________________________________ David R. Montgomery Reading Committee: ____________________________________________________________ Bernard Hallet ____________________________________________________________ David R. Montgomery ____________________________________________________________ Gerard Roe Date:________________________ In presenting this dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the doctoral degree at the University of Washington, I agree that the Library shall make its copies freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of the dissertation is allowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Requests for copying or reproduction of this dissertation may be referred
    [Show full text]
  • Taters Versus Sliders: Evidence for A
    Member Recognition Issue VOL. 31, NO. 7 | J U LY 2 021 ’Taters versus Sliders: Evidence for a Long-Lived History of Strike-Slip Displacement along the Canadian Arctic Transform System (CATS) EXPAND YOUR LIBRARY with GSA E-books The GSA Store offers hundreds of e-books, most of which are only $9.99. These include: • popular field guides and maps; Special Paper 413 • out-of-print books on prominent topics; and Earth and • discontinued series, such as Engineering How GeologistsMind: Think Geology Case Histories, Reviews in and Learn about the Earth Engineering Geology, and the Decade of North American Geology. Each book is available as a PDF, including plates and supplemental material. Popular topics include ophiolites, the Hell Creek Formation, mass extinctions, and plates and plumes. edited by Cathryn A. Manduca and David W. Mogk Shop now at https://rock.geosociety.org/store/. JULY 2021 | VOLUME 31, NUMBER 7 SCIENCE 4 ’Taters versus Sliders: Evidence for a Long- Lived History of Strike Slip Displacement along the Canadian Arctic Transform System (CATS) GSA TODAY (ISSN 1052-5173 USPS 0456-530) prints news and information for more than 22,000 GSA member readers William C. McClelland et al. and subscribing libraries, with 11 monthly issues (March- April is a combined issue). GSA TODAY is published by The Geological Society of America® Inc. (GSA) with offices at Cover: Geologists studying structures along the Petersen Bay 3300 Penrose Place, Boulder, Colorado, USA, and a mail- fault, a segment of the Canadian Arctic transform system (CATS), ing address of P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, CO 80301-9140, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate, Tectonics, and the Morphology of the Andes
    Climate, tectonics, and the morphology of the Andes David R. Montgomery Greg Balco Sean D. Willett Department of Geological Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-1310, USA ABSTRACT Large-scale topographic analyses show that hemisphere-scale climate variations are a ®rst-order control on the morphology of the Andes. Zonal atmospheric circulation in the Southern Hemisphere creates strong latitudinal precipitation gradients that, when incor- porated in a generalized index of erosion intensity, predict strong gradients in erosion rates both along and across the Andes. Cross-range asymmetry, width, hypsometry, and maximum elevation re¯ect gradients in both the erosion index and the relative dominance of ¯uvial, glacial, and tectonic processes, and show that major morphologic features cor- relate with climatic regimes. Latitudinal gradients in inferred crustal thickening and struc- tural shortening correspond to variations in predicted erosion potential, indicating that, like tectonics, nonuniform erosion due to large-scale climate patterns is a ®rst-order con- trol on the topographic evolution of the Andes. Keywords: geomorphology, erosion, tectonics, climate, Andes. INTRODUCTION we argue for the ®rst-order importance of earthquake cycle. Some studies have attribut- The presence or absence of mountain rang- large-scale climate zonations and resulting dif- ed local variations in structural, metamorphic, es at the global scale is determined by the lo- ferences in geomorphic processes to the mor- and geomorphic characteristics of the central cation and type of plate boundaries. Other fac- phology of mountain ranges. Andes to erosion (Gephart, 1994; Masek et al., tors become important in the evolution of 1994; Horton, 1999), but none has considered individual mountain systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotts Creek Watershed Assessment
    Scotts Creek Watershed Assessment A Document of the Scotts Creek Watershed Council Prepared for: West Lake and East Lake Resource Conservation Districts 889 Lakeport Blvd Lakeport, CA 95453 (707) 263-4180 Funded by Proposition 50 through the CALFED Watershed Program Administered by the California Department of Water Resources Prepared by: County of Lake Department of Public Works Water Resources Division 255 North Forbes Street Lakeport, CA 95453 Tel. 707-263-2341 and West Lake and East Lake Resource Conservation Districts 889 Lakeport Blvd. Lakeport, California 95453 Tel. 707-263-4180 February 2010 Acknowledgements Author Erica Lundquist, Lake County Water Resources Division Plates by Greg Dills, West Lake and East Lake Resource Conservation Districts Glossary by Alisa Carlson, Scotts Creek Watershed Council Project Partners Lake County Division of Water Resources Natural Resources Conservation Service Bureau of Land Management Upper Lake Habematolel Pomo Indians Robinson Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians Big Valley Watershed Council Middle Creek Coordinated Resource Management and Planning Group Scotts Creek Watershed Council Technical Advisors and Reviewers Frank Arriaza, Bureau of Land Management Ukiah Office Pardee Bardwell, Bureau of Land Management Ukiah Office Voris Brumfield, Lake County Code Enforcement Division Mark Brannigan, City of Lakeport Richard Burns, Bureau of Land Management Ukiah Office Alisa Carlson, Scotts Creek Watershed Council Caroline Chavez, Lake County Public Services Department Kim Clymire, Lake County Public
    [Show full text]
  • Extension Rates Impact on Endorheic Drainage Longevity and Regional Sediment Discharge
    Extension rates impact on endorheic drainage longevity and regional sediment discharge Michael A. Berry1 Jolante van Wijk1, Daniel García-Castellanos2, Daniel Cadol1, Erica Emry1 1- New Mexico Tech; Socorro, NM 2- Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra Jaume Almera (ICTJA-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain Tectonic and climate drivers exert co-equal forces on the evolution of tectonic sedimen- tary basins. The Rio Grande rift and its drainages provide a backdrop for discussing which drivers drive the transition from endorheic or closed drainage basins to exorheic or open, through-going drainage basins, with both climatic and tectonic drivers being pro- posed by researchers. With a dearth of regional scale extensional landscape modeling studies to draw from, we explore the impact of tectonic extension on endorheic-exorheic transitions and regional sediment and water discharge in both a “dry” and “wet” runoff regimes. We show that holding climate-induced runoff constant, that greater extensional rates correspond to a longer period of sedimentation capture, tectonically induced gradi- ents significantly increases sedimentation long after tectonic activity has terminated, and that developing an endorheic basin is very difficult in high runoff regimes. Implementation of FastScape into reusable software components Benoît Bovy (1) and Jean Braun (1) (1) GFZ Potsdam, Germany We present ongoing work on the development of open-source software around FastScape, a name used to designate a set of efficient algorithms for solving common problems in landscape evolution modelling. The software suite is divided into components that can be reused in many different contexts including experi- mentation, model coupling and direct integration within various scientific software ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • September Gsat 03
    AL SOCIET IC Y G O O F L A O M E E G R I E C H A T GROUNDWORK Furthering the Influence of Earth Science The state of interactions among tectonics, erosion, and climate: A polemic Peter Molnar, Dept. of Geological Sciences, Cooperative what “controlled” the change in those quantities, or what Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), “drove” them. The occurrence of change, external to “equation University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0399, (1),” transforms questions that concern drivers or controls from USA; [email protected] being ill posed to well posed. In the earth sciences, perhaps no concept illustrates better a state of quasi-equilibrium than isostasy. Isostasy is not a pro- Since Dahlen and Suppe (1988) showed that erosion can cess; it exists. On short time scales (thousands of years), vis- affect the tectonics of the region undergoing that erosion, cous deformation can retard the inexorable trend toward geodynamicists, tectonic geologists, and geomorphologists isostatic equilibrium, as is illustrated well by the rebound fol- have joined in an effort to unravel the interrelationships lowing the melting of Pleistocene ice sheets. Thus, on such among not only erosion and tectonics but also climate, which time scales, one might understand pressure differences in the affects erosion and is affected by tectonics. The fruits of this asthenosphere as “driving” the overlying lithosphere and sur- effort grow continually, as shown in part by the attraction that faces of Canada or Fennoscandia upward. On longer geologic this subject has for students and young scientists. Yet, it seems time scales, however, isostasy is maintained as a state of equi- to me that progress has been limited by a misconception that librium; like the perfect gas law, “isostasy,” therefore, does not has stimulated this polemic.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of the Freshwater and Anadromous Fishes of California ’
    4 CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME Ca/if. fish and Game 67 ( 1) : 4-38 1981 A LIST OF THE FRESHWATER AND ANADROMOUS FISHES OF CALIFORNIA ’ ’ LEO SHAPOVALOV’, ALMO I. CORDONE, AND WILLIAM A. DILL’ Inland Fisheries Branch California Department of Fish and Game 1416 Ninth Street Sacramento, California 95814 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT . 4 INTRODUCTION ..: . 4 PURPOSE . 5 SCIENTIFIC NAMES . 5 COMMON NAMES . 7 SCOPE . 9 Marine Fishes Successfully fntroduced into the Salton Sea . 9 Forms and Names New to the Main List Since 1959 . 10 Forms and Names Removed from the Main List Since 1959 . 21 REVISED MAIN LIST . 23 Native Species and Established Exotic Species . 23 REVISED SUPPLEMENTARY LISTS . 27 Native Species-Extinct in California . 27 Exotic Species-Unsuccessfully introduced or of Uncertain Status . ...29 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . 35 REFERENCES . 35 This list is the second revision of the check list of the freshwater, anadromous, and euryhaline fishes of California published by Shapovalov and Dill (1950) and first revised by Shapovalov, Dill, and Cordone (1959). The present list consists of a main list of native and established exotic species and five supplementary lists: (i) native species extinct in California, (ii) exotic species unsuccessfully introduced or of uncertain status, (iii) marine fishes successfully introduced into the Salton Sea, (iv) forms and names new to the main list since 1959, and (v) forms and names removed from the main list since 1959. The main list is composed of 124 full species, compris- ing 66 native freshwater and anadromous species, 13 native euryhaline or marine species which occasionally penetrate into fresh water, and 45 introduced species.
    [Show full text]
  • Uplift and Erosion of the San Bernardino
    TECTONICS, VOL. 17, NO.3, PAGES, 360-378 JUNE 1998 Uplift and erosion of the San Bernardino Mountains associated with transpression along the San Andreas fault, California, as constrained by radiogenic helium thermochronometry James A. Spotila, Kenneth A. Farley, and Kerry Sieh Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena Abstract. Apatite helium thermochronometry provides 1. Introduction new constraints on the tectonic history of a recently The San Bernardino Mountains (SBMs) have risen uplifted crystalline mass adjacent to the San Andreas fault. during the past few Myr in association with transpression By documenting aspects of the low-temperature (40°- along the San Andreas fault zone in southern California 100°C) thermal history of the tectonic blocks of the San [cf. Dibblee, 1975; Sadler, 1982a; Meisling and Weldon, Bernardino Mountains in southern California, we have 1989]. The complex evolution of this convergent stretch placed new constraints on the magnitude and timing of of the San Andreas system and the relationship between uplift. Old helium ages (64-21 Ma) from the large Big transpression and orogeny along it are not fully understood Bear plateau predate the recent uplift of the range and show [Matti and Morton, 1993; Weldon eta/., 1993; Dibblee, that only several kilometers of exhumation has taken place 1982]. At first glance, the SBMs appear to be a single since the Late Cretaceous period. These ages imply that structural entity because of their discrete geographic form the surface of the plateau may have been exposed in the (Plate 1). However, the range actually consists of several late Miocene and was uplifted only -1 km above the distinct, fault-bounded blocks that diminish in size and Mojave Desert in the last few Myr by thrusting on the become more structurally complex toward the San Andreas north and south.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers and Riverine Landscapes 3 4 David R
    1 2 Rivers and riverine landscapes 3 4 David R. Montgomery1 and Ellen E. Wohl2 5 6 1 Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA 7 2 Department of Earth Resources, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO, USA 8 9 10 11 Introduction Types of Channels 12 13 The study of fluvial processes and sediment transport has Recognition that there are different types of river and stream 14 a long history (e.g. Chezy,´ 1775; du Boys, 1879; Manning, channels is nothing new. In a paper based on his experiences 15 1891; Shields, 1936) before groundbreaking studies in the with the U.S. Exploring Expedition from 1838 to 1842, J.D. 16 1950s and 1960s established fundamental empirical aspects Dana discussed fundamental differences between mountain 17 of hydraulic geometry and advanced understanding of the channels and lowland rivers on islands of the South Pacific 18 general processes governing river morphology and dynamics. (Dana, 1850). Similarly, large differences in river patterns 19 Over the last 40 years fluvial geomorphology has grown from (e.g. braided, meandering, and straight) have been recognized 20 a focus primarily on studies of the mechanics and patterns of and studied for decades. Although many fundamental aspects 21 alluvial rivers to an expanded interest in mountain channels, of river processes have been applied in the study of rivers 22 the role of rivers in landscape evolution and as a geological worldwide, researchers have increasingly recognized that 23 force, and the relation of fluvial processes to aquatic and ripar- rivers also have distinctly regional character (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Of I Wo Iiaternary from , California
    ofp rr-iI wo iiaternary from , California U.S. GEOLOGICAL SUHVEY PROFESSIONAL PARER 1363 AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the cur­ rent-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Sur­ vey publications released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" Publications that are listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" are no longer available. Prices of reports released to the open files are given in the listing "U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Reports," updated month­ ly, which is for sale in microfiche from the U.S. Geological Survey, Books and Open-File Reports Section, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications of general in­ Books of the U.S. Geological Survey are available over the terest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single copies of Earthquakes counter at the following Geological Survey Public Inquiries Offices, all & Volcanoes, Preliminary Determination of Epicenters, and some mis­ of which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Documents: cellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are obtainable by mail from WASHINGTON, D.C.-Main Interior Bldg., 2600 corridor, 18th and CSts.,NW.
    [Show full text]