German Coal and Lignite Phase-Out

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

German Coal and Lignite Phase-Out Argus White Paper: German coal and lignite phase-out Germany’s final hard coal mine closed at the end of 2018 and the country is now moving to eradicate lignite mining. To this end, its commission on growth, structural change and employment (WSB) has published recommendations for phasing out coal and lignite-fired power generation. The WSB recommends, as a first step, the closure of around 20pc of coal and lignite-fired capacity by 2022 — the same timeframe as for Ger- many completing its exit from nuclear power generation. This white paper highlights the impact on the gen- eration mix and wholesale trading in Europe’s largest power market. THE WSB PROPOSAL The WSB has recommended the closure of up to 8.6GW of into the night. This reflects the difficult task of weaning lignite and hard coal-fired power capacity by 2022, and an end Germany off power sector coal and lignite burn, given that the to power sector coal and lignite burn in 2038. country’s economic prosperity continues to centre around The commission on 26 January presented its final industry in the west and south, leaving east German lignite recommendations on Germany’s phase-out from lignite and states fighting for their mines. coal-fired power generation, as well as on support for lignite The recommendations, if implemented, will have a strong mining regions because these economies will go through a impact on the German merit order, as they would force a structural change. significant amount of coal and lignite-fired capacity off line in WSB members had struggled to come to an agreement in the short to medium term, and offer additional state support the previous meeting, which began on 25 January and lasted for gas-fired combined heat and power (CHP) generation. German generation mix TWh German coal and lignite generation GWh Lignite Gas Hard Coal 50.0 14,000 Renewables Nuclear Lignite Hard coal 45.0 12,000 40.0 35.0 10,000 30.0 8,000 25.0 20.0 6,000 15.0 4,000 10.0 2,000 5.0 0 0 Jan 18 Dec 18 Jan 17 Dec 18 Copyright © 2019 Argus Media group - www.argusmedia.com - All rights reserved. Trademark notice: ARGUS, the ARGUS logo, ARGUS MEDIA, ARGUS DIRECT, Power ARGUS OPEN MARKETS, AOM, FMB, DEWITT, JIM JORDAN & ASSOCIATES, JJ&A, FUNDALYTICS, METAL-PAGES, METALPRICES.COM, Argus publication titles and Argus illuminating the markets index names are trademarks of Argus Media Limited. Argus White Paper: German coal and lignite phase-out Short-term measures 2018-22 European coal and lignite phase-out plans The WSB recommends reducing the lignite and hard coal-fired Country Possible closure year capacity available to the wholesale power market to 15GW each by 2022. This would be a 5GW reduction for market- Denmark 2020 based lignite-fired capacity compared with 2017, and a 7.7GW Austria 2020 fall in installed hard coal-fired capacity over the same period. But additional capacity closures would be below this 12.7GW, France 2022 as market-based lignite and coal-fired capacity fell in 2018 UK 2025 and additional closures or exits from the wholesale market are already earmarked for 2019-20. Italy 2025 Lignite-fired capacity stood at around 20GW at the end of Hungary 2025 2017. Around 1.1GW joined the existing lignite plant reserve in Portugal 2029 October 2018. Another 700MW will join it this October, leaving 18.2GW available to the wholesale market by the fourth quarter. Spain 2030 An additional 3.2GW then has to shut down to get to the 15GW Netherlands 2030 of market-based capacity proposed by the WSB. The WSB said in its final document that it would prefer the Hambach Ireland 2030 forest in North Rhine-Westphalia to be preserved, suggesting Finland 2030 that its proposal on near-term lignite-fired closures could hit German utility RWE’s Neurath and Niederaussem plants, which Germany 2038 are supplied primarily by the Hambach mine. A court order on — Argus research logging in Hambach forced RWE to scale back output at Neurath and Niederaussem by 9-13TWh in 2019-21, as the mine would have to be extended to allow the plants to run at full load. Energy sector emission targets The hard coal capacity closures are less certain. Coal- fired capacity stood at 22.7GW at the end of 2017. The WSB’s Emissions, actual/target in mn t/ CO2e 600 20 final document pegs the closures in 2018-20 at 3.2GW. Nearly Cut in % relative to 1990 900MW shut down last year, around 1.4GW is earmarked to Cut in % relative to 2018 10 500 close by the end of March, and another 200MW is scheduled 0 to shut by 2020. And the WSB includes the potential closure of 400 -10 German utility Uniper’s 760MW hard coal-fired Scholven plant -20 by the start of the next decade. The firm plans to replace the 300 -30 unit with a smaller gas-fired CHP plant at the same site. These closures would cut hard coal-fired capacity available 200 -40 to the market to 19.5GW by 2020 if Uniper’s 1.1GW Datteln 4 -50 100 plant does not come on line, or to 20.6GW if it does. Uniper -60 intends to bring the delayed Datteln 4 on line next summer. 0 -70 But the WSB recommends that the German government 1990 2014 2018 2030 German power sector emissions by fuel 2017 % Emissions by lignite plant 2017 mn t 300 250 200 150 Coal Gas 100 Lignite 50 Nuclear 0 Oil Neurath Boxberg Wahlitz Deuben Schkopau Weisweiler Buschhaus Lippendorf Goldenberg Martinswerk… Janschwalde Fortuna Nord Frimmersdorf Niederaussem HKW Merkenich Schwarze Pumpe argusmedia.com 2 Copyright © 2019 Argus Media group Argus White Paper: German coal and lignite phase-out seek negotiations with the owners of under-construction coal- based on the process used when the previous government set fired plants — which only applies to Datteln 4 — to ensure that up the 2.7GW lignite-fired reserve, or through an auction. these plants are not commissioned. Energy sector greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions would fall Based on the 2020 outlook for coal-fired capacity by at least 45pc against 1990 levels with the implementation available to the market, Germany would have to shut down of the proposed measures, the WSB said. Energy sector GHG 4.5-5.6GW of hard coal capacity by 2022 to get to 15GW of emissions stood at 427mn t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) in 1990. installed capacity, depending on the future of Datteln 4. The outlook for market-based coal-fired capacity in 2021- Medium-term measures: 2023-30 22 is uncertain, according to the WSB report. Gas-fired CHP Market-based capacity should fall to 9GW for lignite- projects could replace up to 1.2GW of coal-fired capacity over fired plants and to 8GW for hard coal-fired units by 2030, that period, although it is uncertain whether these projects which would force the closure of another 6GW and 7GW, could be completed by 2022, according to the WSB. respectively, in 2023-30, the WSB recommends. Added to this, local utility Steag’s Bexbach and Weiher 3 Compensation payments would be higher the earlier coal-fired units, with total capacity of 1.4GW, could return to plants shut down over that period, although this applies only the market at the start of the next decade. Steag had planned to to plants with a life span of 25 years or more. mothball the units but they have been declared system relevant For lignite closures, Berlin should enter bilateral talks on and, as a result, have been part of the grid reserve since 2017. compensation payments. If these talks fail to conclude by the And hard coal-fired plant operators have signalled plans to end of June 2020, the government should set compensation close 2GW of capacity in 2020-22, but could withdraw plans for within the framework of what is legally required. shutdowns, the WSB added. This means that coal-fired capacity For hard coal-fired plants, the government should available to the market could rise by up to 1.4GW in 2020-22, if introduce an auction scheme where plant owners could bid the Steag units return and there are no additional shutdowns. for a shutdown premium. If tenders are oversubscribed, the But the WSB’s base-case scenario sees market-based coal-fired premium would be awarded to the plants with the highest capacity little changed in 2022 against 2020, at 19.3-20.3GW. CO2 emissions. There would be no tender in years where The WSB recommends no longer issuing permits for new commercial coal-fired plant closures are sufficient to lower lignite and coal-fired plants, and that the 2.3GW of hard coal- CO2 emissions to meet the target for that year. fired capacity in the grid reserve be replaced by gas-fired units. The WSB wants power sector GHG emissions to fall steadily Compensation for plant closures in 2018-22 should be in 2023-30 so that they reach 175mn-183mn t of CO2e by 2030. Utility reactions to the WSB recommendations German utility RWE said the 2038 end date for a coal phase- The firm’s business plan, which includes mining beyond out and the scope of plant closures recommended by the 2040 in the Lausitzer territory, would be negatively affected WSB is ambitious, especially as Germany is phasing out if the WSB recommendations go ahead with a 2038 deadline. nuclear energy by the end of 2022.
Recommended publications
  • Middle School - Round 14A
    MIDDLE SCHOOL - ROUND 14A TOSS-UP 1) Earth and Space – Short Answer What is the term for sediment with a particle size less than 2 microns? ANSWER: CLAY BONUS 1) Earth and Space – Multiple Choice Which of the following correctly describes the typical progression from dead organic matter to coal? W) Peat, lignite, bituminous [bih-TOOM-in-us], anthracite [AN-thrah-site] X) Lignite, peat, bituminous, anthracite Y) Lignite, bituminous, peat, anthracite Z) Peat, bituminous, anthracite, lignite ANSWER: W) PEAT, LIGNITE, BITUMINOUS, AND ANTHRACITE ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ TOSS-UP 2) Physical Science – Short Answer Chlorine has an atomic mass of 35.45. Given that chlorine has two naturally-occurring isotopes, chlorine-35 and chlorine-37, then, to the nearest whole number, what percentage of chlorine atoms have a mass number of 35.45? ANSWER: ZERO BONUS 2) Physical Science – Short Answer To the nearest gram, what is the mass of two moles of carbon dioxide? ANSWER: 88 Middle School - Round 14A Page 1 TOSS-UP 3) Math – Short Answer What is the slope of a line perpendicular to the line with equation 7x – 4y = –28? ANSWER: –4/7 BONUS 3) Math – Short Answer A fence is built along the perimeter of a 200-foot-by-300-foot rectangular field. Posts are placed at the four corners and every 5 feet thereafter. How many posts are required? ANSWER: 200 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ TOSS-UP 4) Life Science – Short Answer In eukaryotes [YOO-care-ee-oats], DNA and histones are organized into what structures? ANSWER: CHROMOSOMES BONUS 4) Life Science – Short Answer What type of microscopy [my-CRAW-scah-pee] involves the use of a laser, photomultiplier detector, and a pinhole that ensures elimination of out-of-plane light emitted by the sample? ANSWER: CONFOCAL Middle School - Round 14A Page 2 TOSS-UP 5) Energy – Short Answer Researchers at the Joint BioEnergy Institute are studying ionic liquids as a solvent to break down cellulose before biofuel production.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthracite Coal 13
    Rock and Mineral 10-Specimen Kit Companion Book Presented by This mineral kit was also made possible through the generosity of the mining companies who supplied the minerals. If you have any questions or comments about this kit please contact the SME Pittsburgh Section Chair at www.smepittsburgh.org. For more information about mining, visit the following web site: www.smepittsburgh.org BSA’s www.scouting.org - search “Mining in Society” SME’s www.mineralseducationcoalition.org/ Updated July 2016 © SME Pittsburgh Section The SME Pittsburgh Section thanks the companies, mines, and individuals who provided mineral samples and donated time or services that made these mineral kits possible. Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. CONSOL Energy, Inc. Coolspring Stone Supply John T. Boyd Company Morton Salt Murray Energy Corporation Newmont Mining Corporation Reed Gold Mine (State of North Carolina) Steelhead Specialty Minerals United States Gypsum Company US Steel Corporation United Taconite (Cliffs Natural Resources, Inc.) CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 MINERAL IDENTIFICATION 5 FUELS 10 Bituminous Coal 12 Anthracite Coal 13 BASE METAL ORES 14 Iron Ore 15 Copper Ore 16 PRECIOUS METALS 17 Gold Ore 18 ROCKS AND INDUSTRIAL MINERALS 19 Gypsum 21 Limestone 22 Marble 23 Salt 24 Zeolite 25 Note: many of the images reproduced here are from Wikipedia which allows non commercial use or from the Minerals Education Coalition web site http://www.mineralseducationcoalition.org/minerals. INTRODUCTION The effect rocks and minerals have on our daily lives is not always obvious, but this book will help explain how essential they really are. If you don’t think you come in contact with minerals every day, think about these facts below and see if you change your mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Lignite Mining Development Strategy
    Energy Strat egy and P olicy of Kos ovo White Paper LIGNITE MINING DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY STATEM ENT OF PRINCIPL E Recognizing that lignite will remain the principal fuel for electricity generation in the long term, the use of indigenous coal is encouraged in an environmentally and economically responsible manner, as well as reclamation of lands previously disturbed by mining. BACKGROUND Lignite is of outstanding importance to electricity generation in Kosovo. It contributes to 97% of the total electricity generation, 3% being hydro based pow er generation. Considering all the potential sources for pow er generation in Kosovo, coal safely maintains its leading position. The Kosovo lignite mines are operated at one of the most favorable lignite RESOURCE deposits in Europe due to its geological conditions. With an average ADVANTAGE ! stripping ratio of 1.7 m3 of w aste to 1 ton of coal, coal production at Kosovo mines could supply very competitive fuel to the pow er plants, compared to Sufficient for electricity international fuel sources and energy prices. The total estimated generation in decades economically exploited resources of approx. 10,000 Mt represent one of the to come. richest lignite sources in Europe, w hich would allow ambitious pow er generation and expansion schemes in the forth coming decades. Coal supply can rise in correlation w ith increasing electricity consumption. Coal can be supplied w ith the highest degree of security and with predictable price levels. By this, Kosovo can take advantage of its large reserves and of its location in centre of South East Europe, w here lack of electricity is to be expected in the mid to long ter m period.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Characteristics
    CCTR Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research COAL CHARACTERISTICS CCTR Basic Facts File # 8 Brian H. Bowen, Marty W. Irwin The Energy Center at Discovery Park Purdue University CCTR, Potter Center, 500 Central Drive West Lafayette, IN 47907-2022 http://www.purdue.edu/dp/energy/CCTR/ Email: [email protected] October 2008 1 Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research CCTR COAL FORMATION As geological processes apply pressure to peat over time, it is transformed successively into different types of coal Source: Kentucky Geological Survey http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.uky.edu/KGS/coal/images/peatcoal.gif&imgrefurl=http://www.uky.edu/KGS/coal/coalform.htm&h=354&w=579&sz= 20&hl=en&start=5&um=1&tbnid=NavOy9_5HD07pM:&tbnh=82&tbnw=134&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dcoal%2Bphotos%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX 2 Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research CCTR COAL ANALYSIS Elemental analysis of coal gives empirical formulas such as: C137H97O9NS for Bituminous Coal C240H90O4NS for high-grade Anthracite Coal is divided into 4 ranks: (1) Anthracite (2) Bituminous (3) Sub-bituminous (4) Lignite Source: http://cc.msnscache.com/cache.aspx?q=4929705428518&lang=en-US&mkt=en-US&FORM=CVRE8 3 Indiana Center for Coal Technology Research CCTR BITUMINOUS COAL Bituminous Coal: Great pressure results in the creation of bituminous, or “soft” coal. This is the type most commonly used for electric power generation in the U.S. It has a higher heating value than either lignite or sub-bituminous, but less than that of anthracite. Bituminous coal
    [Show full text]
  • The German Coal Phaseout Law FACT SHEET
    The German Coal Phaseout Law FACT SHEET • On Friday, July 3, the German parliament passed the coal phaseout !"#$%&'"&"#()'$*+',-./0'1&"#()'234#5"26'27%#"'*&'&"8'"9"58#*5*8)'("&"#%8*3& law. It designs the path to phase out hard coal and lignite-fired electricity generation (combined ~30% of German electricity !$/&6"%'90:6% generation in 2019) by 2038 at the latest. ;7 +,- • The law requires to pay compensation for companies closing ,45.'90:6% 72D'+,-''' their coal plants as well as to regions where coal has a significant economic effect. In addition, also electricity-intensive companies <656:"=&6) 34(54#6 2>? +,- will receive compensation due to foreseen increase of power prices 781 +,- following from coal phase-out. !"# F40G")) D;'+,- • The coal will be substituted with renewable energy sources and !"# $%&'()*"#+ natural gas. The government’s target is to increase the share of -"%.'/0"& renewables in electricity production to 65% by 2030. 12 +,- E0&"% D1'+,- Launched in the 1990s, the Energiewende is an evolving concept !"#$%"&'(") -C.%090:6% 28'+,- ** +,- which aims at reducing greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), increasing @4&'"5.'0#A6%'B0))4&'B$6&) energy efficiency and the share of renewables while phasing out 22 +,- nuclear power. While originally controversial in German politics, !"#$%&'()*+,()#-.&/0&$12-.(.&$(+-&$34&(#-.(,2//&$54$6/%7286(&9:9 the Energiewende has gained broad political consensus across all parties since the 2011 nuclear accident in Fukushima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
    [Show full text]
  • Production Tax Credit for Refined Coal Part
    Production Tax Credit for Refined Coal Part III - Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous Notice 2009-90 SECTION 1. PURPOSE This notice sets forth interim guidance pending the issuance of regulations relating to the tax credit under § 45 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) for refined coal. SECTION 2. BACKGROUND Sections 45(c)(7), (d)(8), and (e)(8) of the Code provide definitions and rules relating to the tax credit for refined coal (the refined coal credit). Section 45(e)(8) provides that the refined coal credit increases a taxpayer’s credit determined under the other provisions of § 45. The credit is allowed for qualified refined coal (1) produced by the taxpayer at a refined coal production facility during the ten-year period beginning on the date the facility is originally placed in service, and (2) sold by the taxpayer to an unrelated person during that ten-year period. Sections 45(c)(7), (d)(8), and (e)(8) were added to the Code by sections 710(a), (b)(1), and (b)(2), respectively, of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, 2 Pub. L. No. 108-357. These provisions were amended by sections 403(t) and 412(j)(1) and (2) of the Gulf Opportunity Zone Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-135, and by sections 101 and 108 of the Energy Improvement and Extension Act of 2008, Division B of Pub. L. No. 110-343. SECTION 3. DEFINITIONS, ETC. The following definitions apply for purposes of this notice: .01 Refined Coal. (1) In General. Except as otherwise provided in this section 3.01, the term “refined coal” means fuel that-- (a) is a liquid, gaseous, or solid fuel produced from coal (including lignite) or high carbon fly ash, including (except to the extent inconsistent with section 3.01(1)(b) of this notice) such fuel used as a feedstock; (b) is sold by the taxpayer (producer), to an unrelated person, with the reasonable expectation that it will be used for the purpose of producing steam; and (c) is certified by the taxpayer as resulting (when used in the production of steam) in a qualified emission reduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Rehabilitation of Surface Coal Mining Areas: the Case of Greek Lignite Mines
    energies Article Sustainable Rehabilitation of Surface Coal Mining Areas: The Case of Greek Lignite Mines Francis Pavloudakis 1, Christos Roumpos 1,* , Evangelos Karlopoulos 2 and Nikolaos Koukouzas 2 1 Mining Engineering Department, Public Power Corporation, 104 32 Athens, Greece; [email protected] 2 Research Department, Chemical Process & Energy Resources Institute, Centre for Research & Technology Hellas, 15125 Athens, Greece; [email protected] (E.K.); [email protected] (N.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +30-697-979-9291 Received: 2 July 2020; Accepted: 31 July 2020; Published: 3 August 2020 Abstract: Surface lignite mines of the Balkan Peninsula face growing pressure due to the CO2 emissions reduction initiatives, rapidly increasing renewable-power capacity, and cheap natural gas. In this frame, the development of a modern mine land rehabilitation strategy is considered as a prerequisite for mitigating the social and economic impacts for the local communities. In the case of western Macedonia lignite mines, these prospects are investigated based on a PEST (political, economic, social, technological) analysis of seven alternative land uses. Urban (industrial) development, green houses, and industrial heritage parks are considered as the most appropriate land uses for mitigating the socioeconomic impacts due to the loss of employments. For the land uses occupying large areas (i.e., agriculture, forestry, livestock farming, and photovoltaic parks), an optimisation algorithm is proposed for determining the mix of land uses that maximise revenue, equity, and natural conservation and minimise investment. The algorithm was applied using the opinions of 10 experts, who were involved in mine land reclamation projects carried out in the western Macedonia region in the recent past.
    [Show full text]
  • IRS Issues Section 45 Guidance Regarding Refined Coal Facilities David S
    CLIENT A LERT December 2009 Contacts IRS Issues Section 45 Guidance Regarding Refined Coal Facilities David S. Lowman, Jr. 1900 K Street, NW On December 7, 2009, the Internal 2009, the inflation adjustment factor is Washington, DC 20006-1109 Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued Notice 1.4171 and the resulting credit amount (202) 419-2070 [email protected] 2009-90 (the “Notice”), providing guid- is $6.20 per ton for calendar year 2009. ance relating to the tax credit under Laura Ellen Jones Section 45 of the Internal Revenue Code Section 4.01 of the Notice refers to Riverfront Plaza, East Tower (“Code”) for refined coal. Section 45 of this credit amount as the “tentative 951 East Byrd Street the Code provides a tax credit for the credit” and provides rules for a taxable Richmond, Virginia 23219-4074 production of refined coal at a refined year that is a calendar year and for a (804) 788-8746 taxable year that includes parts of two [email protected] coal production facility during the 10-year period beginning on the date the facility calendar years. In the former case, the Timothy L. Jacobs was originally placed in service, and tentative credit for the taxable year is 1900 K Street, NW sold by the taxpayer to an unrelated the tentative credit for the calendar year. Washington, DC 20006-1109 person (defined in the same manner In the latter case, the tentative credit (202) 955-1669 as with respect to other Section 45 for the taxable year is the sum of the [email protected] facilities) during such 10-year period.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Transition in Australia: an Overview of Issues
    Crawford School of Public Policy Centre for Climate & Energy Policy Coal transition in Australia: an overview of issues CCEP Working Paper 1811 Sep 2018 Frank Jotzo Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University Salim Mazouz Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University John Wiseman University of Melbourne With Fergus Green, LSE; Stephanie Campbell, University of Melbourne, Lars Coenen, University of Melbourne; Paul Burke, ANU; Rohan Best, ANU Abstract Australia produces and exports large amounts of thermal coal. This industry is likely to be in long term decline. This paper provides an overview of Australian coal production and exports and discusses issues for the transition of the coal industry. It sketches possible scenarios for declining domestic use of thermal coal, and summarizes a case study of the closure of the Hazelwood power station and the programs to help the regional social and economic adjustment. | THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Acknowledgments: This report is based on several individual research papers that have been published as working papers or are in preparation. Support by the Coal Transitions project managed by IDDRI and ClimateStrategies, with funding provided by the KR Foundation, is gratefully acknowledged. This working paper originally appeared as a project report published by IDDRI. JEL Classification: J08; Q40; R10 Suggested Citation: Jotzo, F., Mazouz, S. and Wiseman, J. et al (2018), Coal transition in Australia: an overview of issues, CCEP Working Paper 1903, Sep 2018. Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University. Address for Correspondence: Frank Jotzo Centre for Climate and Energy Policy Crawford School of Public Policy The Australian National University ANU College of Asia and the Pacific J.G.
    [Show full text]
  • Hambach Open-Cast Mine Germany
    Hambach open-cast mine Germany Sectors: Coal Mining On record This profile is no longer actively maintained, with the information now possibly out of date Send feedback on this profile By: BankTrack Created on: Sep 18 2018 Last update: Jun 30 2020 Contact: [email protected] Project website Status Planning Design Agreement Construction Operation Closure Decommission Sectors Coal Mining Location Status Planning Design Agreement Construction Operation Closure Decommission Website http://www.rwe.com/web/cms/en/1858872/rwe-generation-se/fuels/location-overview/germany/hambach/ About Hambach open-cast mine The Hambach open-cast mine (Hambacher Tagebau), owned by RWE, is located in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. The mine is the largest open-cast mine of Western Europe: it covers a surface of 8 by 10 kilometres and is around 500 metres deep. The mine has a coal output of 40 million tonnes per year and its operations make use of the largest automated machinery in the world (220 metres long, 96 metres high, 13,500 tonnes heavy). Together with the coal outputs from Garzweiler and Inden - two other open-cast lignite mines in the area that are also owned by RWE - the Hambach mine's output is enough to produce 40% of the current power consumption of North Rhine-Westphalia. RWE has extraction rights for the mine until 2040. Latest developments Court rejects lawsuit aiming to protect Hambach Forest Mar 13 2019 RWE agrees to leave Hambach Forest untouched until autumn 2020 Feb 20 2019 Why this profile? The Hambach open-cast lignite mine lies adjacent to the last remaining part of the 12,000 year old Hambach Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Disciplining Coal Resistance – the Dynamics of Violence and Power in Disciplining the Resistance Against the Hambach Coal Mine in Germany
    Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences Disciplining coal resistance – The dynamics of violence and power in disciplining the resistance against the Hambach coal mine in Germany Vera Schumann Master’s Thesis • 30 HEC Environmental Communication and Management - Master’s Programme Department of Urban and Rural Development Uppsala 2019 Disciplining coal resistance - The dynamics of violence and power in disciplining the resistance against the Hambach coal mine in Germany Vera Schumann Supervisor: Erica von Essen, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Urban and Rural Development Examiner: Hanna Bergeå, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Urban and Rural Development Credits: 30 HEC Level: Second cycle (A2E) Course title: Master thesis in Environmental science, A2E, 30.0 credits Course code: EX0897 Course coordinating department: Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment Programme/Education: Environmental Communication and Management – Master’s Programme Place of publication: Uppsala Year of publication: 2019 Online publication: https://stud.epsilon.slu.se Keywords: resistance, disciplining dissent, violence, Galtung, power, climate justice Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences Department of Urban and Rural Development Abstract With climate change being one of the biggest challenges our society is faced with, resistance against fossil fuel companies is on the rise. One such example is the resistance against the Hambach coal mine close to Cologne in Western Germany which is the world’s largest opencast lignite mine. It is the site of a long-standing conflict between the operating corporation RWE and residents being reset- tled, as well as forest defenders populating the adjacent Hambach Forest to stop the expansion of the mine and to protect the forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Blackout Which They Stated That, in Terms of RWE Employees Demonstrated Climate Policy, Germany Must Quit to Keep Their Jobs
    14 The German Times – Business March 2019 the federal states that are home BY HEIKE HOLDINGHAUSEN to lignite mines, are expecting aid, as are energy-intensive industries t’s an ambitious goal: By such as aluminum smelters and the /ZB/EUROLUFTBILD DPA/ 2022, Germany will close its fossil-fuel energy sector. Ilast nuclear power plant and, In its recommendations, the com- only 16 years later, stop burning mission envisages within four years’ coal altogether. Too slow or too time the removal from the grid of ambitious? It’s a hot debate in Ger- facilities with a capacity totaling 12 many, at the moment. Neverthe- gigawatts, three gigawatts of which less, the federal government plans derive from burning lignite. The to follow the recommendations of power stations slated for closure the so-called Coal Commission, lie chiefly in the west of Germany, and to codify it in law by May. It i.e. in North Rhine-Westphalia. The will also stipulate which regions Rhineland’s lignite region and its and companies directly affected vast mines would be affected first, by the fossil-fuel phase-out will with the upside that the vigorously receive government aid – and how contested Hambach Forest could much. There’s a lot of money at be preserved. This swath of land stake here. between Cologne and Aachen, The Coal Commission comprises with an area of no more than 500 politicians, company representa- hectares, is all that’s left of a once tives, advocates for environmental expansive forest of beech trees; organizations and scientists. After and it is scheduled to be cleared months of consultations and one to make room for a strip mine in final overnight negotiation mara- development by the Essen energy thon at the end of January, a com- firm, RWE.
    [Show full text]