DOCSLIB.ORG

News in Brief@Yale Law School

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
News in Brief@Yale Law School News in Brief @ Yale Law school opening Argument’s unique double-sided layout ensures that topics receive equal treatment. Alumni who wish to contribute op-eds to opening Argument should contact Justin Muzinich (justin.muzinich@yale. edu) or Tara Helfman ([email protected]). | Y L r Summer 2006 publications It was Opening Argument’s third issue Opening Argument Broadens Debate at YLS (which simply asked contributors “Is NSA WHEN JOINT-DEGREE STUDENT Justin Muzinich and Tara Helfman ’06 first con- wiretapping good policy?”) that garnered sidered starting an op-ed publication at the Law School, they envisioned their peers the most attention from outside the Law School. Contributors included Harvard and faculty as their primary audience. A non-partisan publication focused on current Law School Professor Alan Dershowitz ’62, issues, they reasoned, would be a means of fostering political dialogue within the YLS Senator Conrad Burns, Yale Law School community. Professor John J. Donohue, and several YLS But Opening Argument quickly found ground as far as what’s going on, what students. The issue, in fact, had just been legs beyond the Law School’s courtyard people are talking about,” Muzinich says. printed when it was included in brief- and classrooms. By its second issue, the Among the issues Opening Argument ing materials for members of the Senate publication included opinions on U.S.-U.N. has debated: the Law School’s stance on Judiciary Committee on the eve of their relations penned by former House Speaker military recruiting; the Alito nomination; NSA hearing. Newt Gingrich and former Member of the economics and employment policies of Besides that unanticipated audience of Parliament Tony Colman. By the third issue, Wal-Mart; the South Dakota abortion ban; policy makers, the editors’ greatest reward the publication found its way into the dos- and energy policy. has been seeing Opening Argument being siers of the Senate Judiciary Committee Opening Argument’s form follows its read and discussed at the Law School. just as its NSA surveillance hearings were function as the publication’s philosophy of “Some of the best reactions have been beginning. pluralism guides both its graphic design from people who hold staunch viewpoints Since last September, Helfman and and editorial content. Inspired by Mark and who are sometimes surprisingly grate- Muzinich have put out four issues of Opening Argument. Each issue tackles two By the third issue, Opening Argument found its way current, hot-button public policy topics. into the dossiers of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Though Opening Argument takes aim at just as its NSA surveillance hearings were beginning. controversial subjects, its editors hope to create discussion without being divisive. “We want to foster an exchange of Twain’s Diaries of Adam and Eve, each issue ful for having had read a well-written, views where different sides can be debated is designed with a double-sided layout, opposing viewpoint,” Helfman says. openly and given equal treatment,” ensuring its topics receive equal treatment. The other reward, Muzinich adds, has Helfman says. “We want to shy away from Diversity of both viewpoint and experi- been the positive response and financial people assuming staunch viewpoints and ence is the editors’ key criterion in selecting support Opening Argument has received. talking only to their own camps. What contributors for the publication. First-year Every good publication has its fairy god- we’re trying to do is bring all of the camps law students’ opinions are frequently mother; Opening Argument’s came in the into one eminently readable and concise printed alongside those of senators and form of the Zelia P. Ruebhausen Student publication.” business leaders as the academic and voca- Fund established to foster student and fac- The questions posed by the co-editors tionally oriented alike are invited to weigh ulty intellectual exchange. are frequently inspired by email, classroom, in. The issue that tackles Wal-Mart, for Though Helfman graduated this year, and student lounge discussions. In fact, an example, includes a rather theoretical con- she plans to stay involved in Opening email thread that began on the 3L listserv tribution by Richard Epstein ’68 and a more Argument. “Justin and I both feel a bit pro- after a YLS student asked a question on operationally oriented opinion written by prietary over this,” she says. “We started C-SPAN gave Opening Argument its first Wal-Mart’s Executive Vice President and Opening Argument with a commitment to topic—diversity in judicial nominations. Chief Operating Officer Eduardo Castro- first-rate content, and we’ve striven to pro- “We really try to keep our ear to the Wright. vide exactly that, issue after issue.” Œ ˘ News in Brief Law School Announces Five Faculty Appointments Five new faculty members join the YLS community this academic year, bringing their expertise in the areas of constitutional, criminal, corporate, employment, and immigration law. Christine Jolls, a leading scholar in employment law and law and economics, joined the Law School faculty as a professor of law. Jolls has been in the forefront of the emerging field of behavioral law Heather K. Gerken, whose areas of and economics, a cutting-edge area Yair Listokin ’05 was recently study include election law, constitu- of scholarship that incorporates appointed associate professor of law. tional law, and civil procedure, joined behavioral models into the eco- His primary research and teaching the faculty as a professor of law on nomic analysis of law. interests are business organizations, July 1. Gerken is one of the country’s A Phi Beta Kappa graduate of bankruptcy, contracts, corporate leading experts on voting rights Stanford University, Jolls majored in finance, and empirical legal studies. and election law, the role of groups English and quantitative economics Listokin earned an A.B. magna cum in the democratic process, and as an undergraduate. She received laude in economics from Harvard the relationship between diversity a J.D. magna cum laude from in 1998, a Ph.D. in economics from and democracy. Harvard Law School (where she won Princeton in 2002, and a J.D. from Yale Gerken comes to YLS from Harvard the John M. Olin Prize in Law and Law School in 2005. Law School, where she was appointed Economics) and a Ph.D. in economics As a YLS student, Listokin was twice assistant professor of law in 2000 from the Massachusetts Institute of named the John M. Olin Prize winner and promoted to professor of law Technology. for the best student paper in law in 2005. An acclaimed teacher, she Jolls joined the Harvard faculty in and economics, and he was a John M. was the first junior professor in the 1994 before serving as a law clerk for Olin Fellow in Law and Economics. In history of Harvard Law School to Judge Stephen F. Williams of the D.C. 2005-06, he clerked for Judge Richard receive the Sacks-Freund Award for Circuit, and then for U.S. Supreme A. Posner at the U.S. Court of Appeals, Teaching Excellence, awarded Court Justice Antonin Scalia. She Seventh Circuit. annually to Harvard Law School’s returned to the Harvard faculty most outstanding instructor. in 1997 and was named professor A summa cum laude graduate of of law there in 2001. Jolls won the Princeton University, Gerken earned Harvard Law School Dean’s teaching her J.D. (also summa cum laude) award in spring 2003, and served as from the University of Michigan Harvard Law School’s vice dean for Law School. She served as a law scholarship and intellectual life in clerk for Judge Stephen Reinhardt 2003-04. of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Jolls serves on a number of Ninth Circuit, and for Justice David H. editorial and advisory boards, is a Souter of the United States Supreme research associate of the National Court, before entering private prac- Bureau of Economic Research tice in Washington, D.C. (where she co-directs the Program Gerken is currently working on a in Law and Economics), and serves book on the trans-substantive con- as reporter of the American cept of “second-order diversity” in Law Institute’s Restatement of American public law. Employment Law. Jolls is currently working on a book entitled Equality’s Tools. | Y L r Summer 2006 Access to Knowledge conference Draws hundreds to Law School The information revolution holds great but fragile promise for devel- opment, freedom, and justice. But without a coherent framework for Michael J. Wishnie ’93, a graduate why access to knowledge matters, of both Yale University and Yale Law this potential could be undermined by School, recently joined the YLS faculty Tracey L. Meares will join the Law the growing trend of ownership and as clinical professor of law. School faculty in January 2007 as a regulation of knowledge. Wishnie’s expertise includes immi- professor of law. Meares’s teaching To help determine the future of this gration law and the civil rights of and research interests center on Access to Knowledge (A2K), Yale Law immigrants, including the rights of criminal procedure and criminal law School’s Information Society Project, non-citizens in the workplace, under policy, with a particular emphasis led by Professors Jack Balkin and the welfare laws, and on habeas on empirical investigation of these Yochai Benkler, sponsored a confer- corpus. His work at the Law School subjects. ence on April 21-23, 2006, at the Law will address employment issues Meares earned a B.S. in general School. affecting low-wage and undocu- engineering from the University Policy makers, activists, industry mented workers and civil liberties of Illinois, and a J.D. from The leaders, and academics addressed after September 11, in a program University of Chicago Law School.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • OPINION and DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH; GAIL J
    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISTIN M. PERRY; SANDRA B. STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO, Plaintiffs-Appellees, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., in his official capacity as Governor of California; KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. HORTON, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State Registrar of Vital Statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda; DEAN C. LOGAN, in his official capacity as Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Defendants, 1569 1570 PERRY v. BROWN HAK-SHING WILLIAM TAM, Intervenor-Defendant, and DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH; GAIL J. No. 10-16696 KNIGHT; MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ; D.C. No. MARK A. JANSSON; 3:09-cv-02292- PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM-YES ON 8, VRW A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL, as official proponents of Proposition 8, Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants. KRISTIN M. PERRY; SANDRA B. STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO, Plaintiffs-Appellees, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., in his official capacity as Governor of California; KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. HORTON, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State Registrar of Vital Statistics; PERRY v. BROWN 1571 LINETTE SCOTT, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda; DEAN C.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice to Media, Public Regarding Oral Arguments in Perry V. Brown
    A N N O U N C E M E N T November 30, 2011 Contact: David Madden (415) 355-8930 Notice to Media, Public Regarding Oral Arguments in Perry v. Brown SAN FRANCISCO – The following information is intended for news media covering upcoming oral arguments in the Proposition 8 case, Perry v. Brown, Appeal Nos. 11-17255 and 11-16577, and for members of the public seeking to observe the proceedings. Oral arguments will be heard by a panel of three judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Thursday, December 8, 2011, beginning at 2:30 p.m. (Pacific time) in Courtroom One on the third floor of the James R. Browning U.S. Courthouse, 95 7th St., San Francisco. The panel consists of Circuit Judges Stephen Reinhardt of Los Angeles and N. Randy Smith of Pocatello, Idaho, and Senior Circuit Judge Michael Daly Hawkins of Phoenix. Two appeals will be argued: Appeal No. 11-17255 involves an appeal of a ruling by Chief District Judge James Ware of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on September 19, 2011, allowing the public release of videotapes made of the civil bench trial in Perry v. Hollingsworth. Oral arguments in this matter are scheduled to begin at 2:30 p.m. Appeal No. 11-16577 involves an appeal of a ruling by Chief District Judge Ware on June 14, 2011, denying a motion to vacate the judgment in Perry v. Hollingsworth on the ground that the presiding judge, then-Chief Judge Vaughn R.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Users\Johne\Downloads\ALA Court Memorial Program.Wpd
    OPENING OF COURT UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Cathy A. Catterson FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Circuit and Court of Appeals Executive Special Court Session in Memory of PRESIDING and OPENING REMARKS The Honorable Sidney R. Thomas Chief Judge THE HONORABLE United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ARTHUR L. ALARCÓN REMARKS The Honorable Dorothy W. Nelson Senior Circuit Judge United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit The Honorable Deanell R. Tacha Dean, Pepperdine University School of Law Chief Judge Emeritus, United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (Retired) Richard G. Hirsch, Esq. Partner, Nasatir, Hirsch, Podberesky & Khero Thursday, June 4, 2015, 4:00 P.M. The Honorable Mary E. Kelly Courtroom Three Administrative Law Judge, California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board Law Clerk to Judge Alarcón, 1980 - 1982, 1993 - 1994 RICHARD H. CHAMBERS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING The Honorable Gregory W. Alarcon Superior Court, County of Los Angeles 125 South Grand Avenue Pasadena, California ADJOURNMENT Reception Immediately Following 1925 Born August 14th in Los Angeles, California 1943 - 1946 Staff Sergeant, Army Infantry. Awarded multiple honors for battlefield bravery and leadership 1949 B.A., University of Southern California (USC) 1951 LL.B., USC School of Law Editorial Board Member, USC Law Review 1952 - 1961 Deputy District Attorney, County of Los Angeles 1961 - 1964 Legal Advisor, Clemency/Extradition Secretary and Executive Assistant to Gov. Edmund G. “Pat” Brown 1964 - 1978 Judge, Superior Court, County of Los Angeles 1978 - 1979 Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal 1979 - 2015 First Hispanic judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
    [Show full text]
  • July 13Th 2005
    California State University, San Bernardino CSUSB ScholarWorks Inland Empire Hispanic News Special Collections & University Archives 7-13-2005 July 13th 2005 Hispanic News Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/hispanicnews Recommended Citation Hispanic News, "July 13th 2005" (2005). Inland Empire Hispanic News. 469. https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/hispanicnews/469 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Collections & University Archives at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Inland Empire Hispanic News by an authorized administrator of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Support Our Service Organizations “n 33 CO m C/} on T1 CO m c OD o33 Wednesday, July 13, 2005 <*• CD —1 m 1 9 2805 —1 "O Volume 18 as3 o o z > CO CO Number 21 O zs' library p CD oo o a > >o 30 O TheH Inlandispanic Empire's only Hispanic-owned EnglishNi lar ewspaper San Bernardino ♦ Riverside ♦ Colton ♦ Rialto ♦ Fontana ♦ iey Ontario ♦ Corona ♦ Bloomington ♦ Rancho Cucamonga ♦ Hig JIands NEW MAYOR ANTONIO VILLARAIGOSA INLAND EMPIRE CELEBRATES 4^” OF JULY ELATES LATINOS Cities in the iniand Empire caught the spirit of patriotism in sup­ port of our Armed Forces and pianned 4*'' of Juiy parades, includ­ ing the City of San Bernardino. The following pictorial reviewed on page 4 reflects the diverse units and exhibits in the parade. Antonio Villaraigosa, center, taking the oath of office for Mayor of the City of Los Angeies, with his wife, Gorina, left, holding the family bible, and Judge Stephen Reinhardt of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Mourns Passing of Judge Stephen Reinhardt
    N E W S R E L E A S E March 30, 2018 Contact: David J. Madden, (415) 355-8800 Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Mourns Passing of Judge Stephen Reinhardt SAN FRANCISCO — Judges and staff of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit are mourning the loss of a distinguished jurist, Judge Stephen Reinhardt, who died Thursday (March 29, 2018) after suffering a heart attack. He was 87. Judge Reinhardt, who lived and maintained chambers in Los Angeles, served as an active judge of the court for more than 37 years. “Judge Reinhardt is rightly considered to be one of the giants of the law. He earned his reputation by virtue of a brilliant legal mind, an unmatched work ethic and deeply held principles. He resolutely pursued justice as he saw it,” Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Sidney R. Thomas said. Chief Judge Emeritus J. Clifford Wallace said of Judge Reinhardt, “His life was focused on the law and with his brilliant mind, he became one of the most effective contributors to our judicial system.” “Steve battled his entire career for civil rights and civil liberties. In countless cases he was able to help the little person come out on top by the sheer force of his intellect. His death is a staggering loss” said Chief Judge Emeritus Mary M. Schroeder. Judge Richard Paez made a similar observation. “Judge Reinhardt was inspiring in the how he cared about the less fortunate, about individuals charged with crimes or incarcerated. His concern that they be treated fairly and humanely was just an inspiration to me,” Judge Paez, adding that his late colleague’s contributions to Ninth Circuit law and American jurisprudence “were significant and will be long lasting.” Often referred to as the “liberal lion,” Judge Reinhardt did not set aside his principles when he came onto the bench.
    [Show full text]
  • Chairman Jay Clayton Public Calendar March 1, 2020 to March 31, 2020
    Chairman Jay Clayton Public Calendar March 1, 2020 to March 31, 2020 Monday, March 2, 2020 9:30 am Meeting with Fidelity Investments including: Abby Johnson, Chief Executive Officer; Jonathan Chiel, General Counsel; and Jim Febeo, Head of Federal Government Relations 10:15 am Meeting with staff 11:30 am Meeting with staff 12:30 pm Meeting with Kathy Casey, Chair, Financial Accounting Foundation (FAF) 2:30 pm Federal Housing Finance Oversight Board meeting Tuesday, March 3, 2020 8:15 am Meeting with Kathy Kraninger, Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) 9:30 am Meeting with staff 10:00 am Meeting with staff 10:30 am Meeting with staff 10:45 am Meeting with staff 11:00 am Meeting with staff 11:30 am Meeting with staff 12:30 pm Meeting with Makan Delrahim, Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division, Department of Justice (DOJ) 2:00 pm Meeting with Dimensional Fund Advisors, including: David Booth, Chairman; Gerard O’Reilly, Co-Chief Executive Officer; Catherine Newell, General Counsel; and Bruce Leto, Co-Chair of the Investment Management Practice, Stradley Ronon 2:30 pm Meeting with Third Point, LLC, including: Daniel Loeb, Chief Executive Officer; Jeff Cook-McCormac, Head of Public Affairs; and Rob Collins, Partner, S-3 Group 3:30 pm Meeting with staff 4:00 pm Meeting with Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), including: Robert Cook, President; Bob Colby, Chief Legal Officer; Todd Diganci, Chief Financial Officer; Jonathan Sokobin, Chief Economist; and Greg Dean, Vice President for Government Affairs 5:00 pm Meeting with Commissioner 6:00 pm Meeting with Jessie Liu, former U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas A. Saenz (Chair) President & General Counsel Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF)
    3/5/2019 Thomas A. Saenz (Vice Chair) - The Campaign for College Opportunity Donate Contact Us Select Language ▼ Who We Are What We Do News Room Blog Take Action Donate Thomas A. Saenz (Chair) President & General Counsel Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF) Thomas A. Saenz returned to the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF) in August 2009 as President and General Counsel. Prior, as Counsel to Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, Saenz honed his leadership skills by serving on the four-person executive team to the mayor, where his legal and policy advice proved invaluable. During his four-year tenure with the City of Los Angeles, Saenz helped to lead the legislative effort to change the governance of Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), the effect of which has been to take the City a step closer to securing a quality education for all students in Los Angeles. Saenz also served as the lead liaison on labor negotiations, with a personal goal of addressing serious financial challenges in partnership with the city’s workers. Saenz had previously practiced civil rights litigation at MALDEF for 12 years. During that time, he successfully challenged California’s unconstitutional Proposition 187 and led numerous civil https://collegecampaign.org/tom-saenz/ 1/4 3/5/2019 Thomas A. Saenz (Vice Chair) - The Campaign for College Opportunity rights cases in the areas of immigrants’Donate rights, education, employment,Contact and Usvoting rights.Select Language Saenz ▼ achieved several victories against ordinances unlawfully restricting the rights of day laborers, served as lead counsel in the 2001 challenge to California’s congressional redistricting, and initiated the employment discrimination lawsuit resulting in a $50 million settlement with Abercrombie and Fitch.
    [Show full text]
  • Equal Protection Or "Social Tradition"
    EQUAL PROTECTION OR "SOCIAL TRADITION" The Supreme Court’s Test in the Marriage Cases By Jamie Raskin Tradition is often just the evidence years) died, since DOMA prevents same-sex spouses of silence. –Judith Shklar from inheriting marital property on a tax-free basis, If we had a Supreme Court that cared as much for the liberty and equality of people as it cares for the liberty and equality of corporations, deciding the two cases taken up this Term on the future of marriage discrimination in America would be a piece of cake— wedding cake, to be exact. The Constitution, logic, and precedent are all on the side of equal rights. One case, United States v. Windsor,1 deals with the constitutionality of Section 3 of “DOMA,” the 1996 federal Defense of Marriage Act, Thea Spyer and Edith Windsor Edith Windsor, was forced to pay $363,000 in federal taxes on the a benefit that heterosexual couples, of course, take for estate she inherited after her wife granted. Windsor won a clean victory in the United (and partner of 40 years) died. States Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit, which found that discrimination against gay people triggers Equal Protection “intermediate scrutiny” and that Congress could not demonstrate a valid, much less an important, interest for defining marriage at the federal which provides that the word “marriage” in any federal level so as to exclude from its benefits thousands of law or regulation—including the Social Security actually married couples in the states. Act, the Internal Revenue code, immigration law, and more than 1,000 others—shall apply only to the The other case taken up by the Supreme Court in “legal union of one man and one woman as husband its momentous cert grant of December 7 of last 2 and wife.” This sweeping discrimination means that, year is Hollingsworth v.
    [Show full text]
  • When Judges Lie (And When They Should)
    BUTLER_5FMT 6/15/2007 10:53:19 AM Article When Judges Lie (and When They Should) Paul Butler† What should a judge do when she must apply law that she believes is fundamentally unjust?1 The problem is as old as slavery. It is as contemporary as the debates about capital pun- ishment and abortion rights. In a seminal essay, Robert Cover described four choices that a judge has in such cases. She can (1) apply the law even though she thinks it is immoral; (2) openly reject the law; (3) resign; or (4) subvert the law by pretending that it supports the outcome that the judge desires, even though the judge does not actually believe that it does.2 This Article demonstrates that the fourth choice—judicial “subversion” or lying—is far more common than is openly ac- knowledged. This Article identifies some cases in which judges intentionally have framed the law to achieve a particular out- come. This Article also suggests that this kind of lie is occa- sionally justified. Sometimes it is the best of the imperfect choices that judges have when they are confronted with unjust † Carville Dickinson Benson Research Professor of Law, George Wash- ington University. B.A., Yale University; J.D., Harvard University. Drafts of this Article were presented at faculty workshops at Georgetown Law School, Georgia State Law School, George Washington University Law School, North- eastern Law School, and UCLA Law School. I owe a special debt of gratitude to Hope Lewis, Dan Solove, and Bob Tuttle. Thanks also to Stephen Bain- bridge, Monroe Freedman, Mitu Gulati, Alex Kozinski, Spencer Overton, Ellen Podgor, William Rubenstein, and Gerry Spann.
    [Show full text]
  • Steven Mnuchin - Wikipedia
    1/15/2021 Steven Mnuchin - Wikipedia Steven Mnuchin Steven Terner Mnuchin[2] (/məˈnuːʃɪn/ mə-NOO-shin;[3] born December Steven Mnuchin 21, 1962) is an American politician, investment banker[4] and film producer who is serving as the 77th United States Secretary of the Treasury as part of the Cabinet of Donald Trump. Previously, Mnuchin had been a hedge fund manager and investor. Upon graduating from Yale University in 1985, Mnuchin joined the investment bank Goldman Sachs where his father, Robert E. Mnuchin, was a General Partner. Mnuchin worked at Goldman Sachs for 17 years, eventually becoming its Chief Information Officer. After he left Goldman Sachs in 2002, he worked for and founded several hedge funds. Mnuchin was a member of Sears Holdings's Board of Directors from 2005 until December 2016, and prior to this, Mnuchin served on Kmart's Board of Directors.[5] After Sears went bankrupt, the company that formerly owned it sued Mnuchin and ex- CEO Edward Lampert for "asset stripping" during their tenure.[6] During the financial crisis of 2007–2008, Mnuchin bought failed residential lender IndyMac. He changed the name to OneWest Bank and rebuilt the bank, then sold it to CIT Group in 2015. During his time as OneWest CEO and Chairman, the bank became embroiled in several lawsuits over questionable foreclosures. 77th United States Secretary of the Treasury Mnuchin joined Trump's presidential campaign in 2016, and was named Incumbent National Finance Chairman for the campaign. On February 13, 2017, Assumed office Mnuchin was confirmed to be President Donald Trump's secretary of the February 13, 2017 treasury by a 53–47 vote in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit William S. Richardson School of Law University of Hawai’i at Manoa Honolulu, Hawai’i October 18, 2012 Circuit Judge Circuit Judge Circuit Judge Sidney R. Thomas Stephen Reinhardt Richard A. Paez Billings Los Angeles Pasadena (over) Hon. Stephen Reinhardt Age 71 Born in New York, New York Federal Judicial Service: Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; Nominated by Jimmy Carter on November 30, 1979, to a new seat authorized by 92 Stat. 1629. Confirmed by the Senate on September 11, 1980, and received commission on September 11, 1980. Education: Pomona College, B.A., 1951; Yale Law School, LL.B., 1954 Professional Career: U.S. Air Force, 1954-1956; Law clerk, Hon. Luther W. Youngdahl, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, 1956-1957; Private practice, Los Angeles, California, 1957-1980. Hon. Sidney R. Thomas Age 59 Born in Bozeman, Montana Federal Judicial Service: Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; Nominated by William J. Clinton on July 19, 1995, to a seat vacated by Dorothy Wright Nelson. Confirmed by the Senate on January 2, 1996, and received commission on January 4, 1996. Education: Montana State University, B.A., 1975; University of Montana School of Law, J.D., 1978. Professional Career: Legal intern, Hon. W.W. Lessley, Montana State District Court, 18th Judicial District; Private practice, Billings, Montana, 1978-1995; Adjunct instructor of law, Rocky Mountain College, Billings, Montana, 1982-1995. Hon. Richard A. Paez Age 65 Born in Salt Lake City, Utah Federal Judicial Service: Judge, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen R. Reinhardt: a Sense of Fairness and Compassion by HENRY WEINSTEIN*
    APPRECIATIONS Stephen R. Reinhardt: A Sense Of Fairness And Compassion BY HENRY WEINSTEIN* tephen Reinhardt’s sometimes loving tributes to sudden death on the man long known as the SMarch 29 jarred and country’s most outspoken, saddened me. Just six weeks liberal jurist. Those occa- earlier, I sat next to him in a sions brought memories to judge’s chair in the ceremo- the surface. nial courtroom of the Ninth Over a 20-year period, as Circuit Court of Appeals in a reporter for the Los Ange- Pasadena during a confer- les Times, I wrote dozens of ence on the impact of Presi- stories about Reinhardt’s dent Jimmy Carter’s judges trenchant opinions and his on the nation’s largest fed- blistering speeches about eral circuit. We chatted at the increasingly cramped lunch, where he was joined and uncharitable view the by former law clerks, includ- U.S. Supreme Court took of ing one I lobbied him to hire civil rights and civil liberties. after she had been my stu- Among them was a 1992 law dent in the inaugural class at school graduation speech in U.C. Irvine Law School. which Reinhardt declared As I spoke to him that that the federal courts were day, it was clear that at 87 he becoming “a bastion of white was still actively engaged in America.” He lamented, his cases. He simultaneously “only a few years ago it was manifested the same acute the federal courts, and par- intellect, lively spirit and peri- ticularly the Supreme Court, odic grumpiness. He lamented that offered the greatest hope the worsening health of his to our minorities.
    [Show full text]