Federal Register/Vol. 75, No. 55/Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register/Vol. 75, No. 55/Tuesday, March 23, 2010 13720 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules environmental laws when project by the petition and in Service files does will assist with the conservation of the impacts are reviewed. Although, current not indicate or document a threat to species. If you wish to provide State and Federal regulations regarding southern hickorynut mussels due to information regarding the species, you pollutants are generally assumed to be drought or floods. may submit your information or protective of freshwater mollusks, we do materials to the Field Supervisor, Finding have information to indicate that some Mississippi Ecological Services Field pollutant standards may not be We have reviewed the petition and Office (see ADDRESSES section) at any protective for freshwater mussels (e.g., supporting information provided with time. Augspurger et al. 2007, p. 2026). the petition and evaluated that However, there is no information in our information in relation to other References Cited files to suggest specific pollution threats pertinent literature and information, A complete list of references cited is to the southern hickorynut in any and we have evaluated the information available on the Internet at http:// specific area, and the petition provided to determine whether the sources cited www.regulations.gov and upon request no information to support the assertion support the claims made in the petition. from the Mississippi Ecological Services therein that existing regulatory We recognize that many freshwater Field Office (see FOR FURTHER mechanisms are inadequate to protect mussel species are experiencing INFORMATION CONTACT). the species. Furthermore, as noted declines in both range and population Author under Factor B, above, the southern abundances due to the generalized hickorynut is not considered a threats identified by the petition. The primary author of this notice is commercial species, has little value in However, review of the information Paul Hartfield (see ADDRESSES). provided in the petition and in our files commerce, and all States within the Authority range of the southern hickorynut either indicates that this species is not regulate or restrict mussel harvest. declining range-wide. The authority for this action is the In summary, we find that the In considering what factors might Endangered Species Act of 1973, as information provided in the petition, as constitute threats, we must look beyond amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). well as other information in our files, the mere exposure of the species to the Dated: March 9, 2010. does not present substantial scientific or factor to determine whether the species Daniel M. Ashe, responds to the factor in a way that commercial information indicating that Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife the petitioned action may be warranted causes actual impacts to the species. If Service. there is exposure to a factor, but no due to the inadequacy of existing [FR Doc. 2010–6111 Filed 3–22–10; 8:45 am] regulations. response, or only a positive response, that factor is not a threat. If there is BILLING CODE 4310–55–S E. Other Natural or Manmade Factors exposure and the species responds Affecting the Species’ Continued negatively, the factor may be a threat DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Existence and we then attempt to determine how The petition asserts that significant a threat it is. If the threat is Fish and Wildlife Service fragmentation of freshwater mussel significant, it may drive or contribute to stream habitat makes mussel species the risk of extinction of the species such 50 CFR Part 17 more vulnerable to droughts and floods that the species may warrant listing as attributed to climate change (e.g., threatened or endangered as those terms [Docket No. FWS-R4-ES-2010-0007] WildEarth Guardians 2008, p. 27, citing are defined by the Act. This does not [MO 92210-0-0008-B2] necessarily require empirical proof of a Hamlet and Lettenmaier 2007, p. 43). Endangered and Threatened Wildlife threat. The combination of exposure and and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a Evaluation of Information in the Petition some corroborating evidence of how the Petition to List the Striped Newt as and Our Files species is likely impacted could suffice. Threatened The petition provided no information The mere identification of factors that on habitat fragmentation or changes in could impact a species negatively may AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, the frequency of droughts and floods not be sufficient to compel a finding Interior. within the range of the southern that listing may be warranted. The ACTION: Notice of petition finding and hickorynut, or on specific detrimental information shall contain evidence initiation of status review. effects of habitat fragmentation, sufficient to suggest that these factors droughts, or floods to the hickorynut. may be operative threats that act on the SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Information in our files documents species to the point that the species may Wildlife Service (Service), announce a mollusk declines within small perennial meet the definition of threatened or 90–day finding on a petition to list the streams that have lost flow as a direct endangered under the Act. We found no striped newt (Notophthalmus result of drought (for example, Golladay information to suggest that threats are perstriatus) as threatened under the et al. 2004, p. 494; Haag and Warren acting on the southern hickorynut such Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 2008, p. 1165). However, most recent that the species may become extinct amended (Act). We find that the petition site records of the southern hickorynut now or in the foreseeable future. presents substantial scientific or are from medium to large perennial Based on this review and evaluation, commercial information indicating that stream channels (e.g., the Big Black, we find that the petition does not listing the striped newt may be Buttahatchee, Amite, Pearl, Tickfaw, present substantial scientific or warranted. Therefore, with the Neches, Arkansas, White, Ouachita, and commercial information to indicate that publication of this notice, we are Hatchie Rivers) that are less susceptible listing the southern hickorynut under initiating a review of the status of the to total loss of flow by drought. In the Act as threatened or endangered species to determine if listing the addition, the wide distribution of the may be warranted at this time. Although species is warranted. To ensure that this species reduces its vulnerability to we will not commence a status review status review is comprehensive, we are extinction due to local stochastic at this time, we encourage interested requesting scientific and commercial threats. Therefore, information provided parties to continue to gather data that data and other information regarding VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:16 Mar 22, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\23MRP1.SGM 23MRP1 wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 23, 2010 / Proposed Rules 13721 this species. Based on the status review, a) Habitat requirements for feeding, determination. Section 4(b)(1)(A) of the we will issue a 12–month finding on the breeding, and sheltering; Act directs that determinations as to petition, which will address whether b) Genetics and taxonomy; whether any species is an endangered or the petitioned action is warranted, as c) Historical and current range, threatened species must be made ‘‘solely provided in section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act. including distribution patterns; on the basis of the best scientific and We will make a determination on d) Historical and current population commercial data available.’’ critical habitat for this species if, and levels, and current and projected trends; and You may submit your information when, we initiate a listing action. concerning this status review by one of DATES: To allow us adequate time to e) Past and ongoing conservation measures for the species, its habitat, the methods listed in the ADDRESSES conduct this review, we request that we section. If you submit information via receive information on or before May or both. 2) The factors that are the basis for http://www.regulations.gov, your entire 24, 2010. After this date, you must submission—including any personal submit information directly to the Field making a listing determination for a species under section 4(a) of the identifying information—will be posted Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Endangered Species Act of 1973, as on the website. If you submit a CONTACT section below). Please note that hardcopy that includes personal we may not be able to address or amended (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et identifying information, you may incorporate information that we receive seq.), which are: a) The present or threatened request at the top of your document that after the above requested date. destruction, modification, or we withhold this personal identifying ADDRESSES: You may submit curtailment of its habitat or range; information from public review. information by one of the following b) Overutilization for commercial, However, we cannot guarantee that we methods: recreational, scientific, or will be able to do so. We will post all • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// educational purposes; c) Disease or hardcopy submissions on http:// www.regulations.gov. Search for Docket predation; www.regulations.gov. No. FWS-R4-ES-2010-0007 and then d) The inadequacy of existing Information and supporting follow the instructions for submitting regulatory mechanisms; or comments. e) Other natural or manmade factors documentation that we received and • U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public affecting its continued existence. used in preparing this finding will be Comments Processing, Attn: FWS-R4- 3) The potential effects of climate available for you to review at http:// ES-2010-0007; Division of Policy and change on this species and its habitat.
Recommended publications
  • Amphibian Identification Guide
    Amphibian Migrations & Road Crossings Amphibian Identification Guide The NYSDEC Hudson River Estuary Program and Cornell University are working with communities to conserve forests, woodland pools, and the wildlife that depend on these critical habitats. This guide is designed to help volunteers of the Amphibian Migrations & Road Crossings Project identify species they observe during spring migrations, when many salamanders and frogs move from forest habitat to woodland pools for breeding. For more information about the project, visit http://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/51925.html. spotted salamander* (Ambystoma maculatum) Black to dark gray body with two rows of yellow spots. Widespread distribution in the Hudson Valley. Total length 5.0-8.0 in. Jefferson/blue-spotted salamander complex* (Ambystoma jeffersonianum x laterale) Brown to grayish black with blue-silver flecking. Less common. Note: Hybridization between Jefferson and blue-spotted salamander has created very variable appearances and individuals may have features of both species. Because even experts have difficulty distinguishing these two species in the field, we consider any sightings to be the ‘complex.’ Total length 3.0-7.5 in. marbled salamander* (Ambystoma opacum) Black or grayish-black body with white or gray crossbars along length of body. Stout body with wide head. Less common. (Breeds in the fall.) Total length 3.5-5.0 in. *Woodland pool breeding species. 0 inches 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Amphibian Migrations & Road Crossings: Amphibian Identification Guide Page 2 of 4 eastern newt (Notophthalmus viridescens) Terrestrial “red eft” stage of newt (above) is reddish-orange with two rows of reddish spots with black borders.
    [Show full text]
  • Notophthalmus Perstriatus) Version 1.0
    Species Status Assessment for the Striped Newt (Notophthalmus perstriatus) Version 1.0 Striped newt eft. Photo credit Ryan Means (used with permission). May 2018 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4 Jacksonville, Florida 1 Acknowledgements This document was prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s North Florida Field Office with assistance from the Georgia Field Office, and the striped newt Species Status Assessment Team (Sabrina West (USFWS-Region 8), Kaye London (USFWS-Region 4) Christopher Coppola (USFWS-Region 4), and Lourdes Mena (USFWS-Region 4)). Additionally, valuable peer reviews of a draft of this document were provided by Lora Smith (Jones Ecological Research Center) , Dirk Stevenson (Altamaha Consulting), Dr. Eric Hoffman (University of Central Florida), Dr. Susan Walls (USGS), and other partners, including members of the Striped Newt Working Group. We appreciate their comments, which resulted in a more robust status assessment and final report. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Species Status Assessment (SSA) is an in-depth review of the striped newt's (Notophthalmus perstriatus) biology and threats, an evaluation of its biological status, and an assessment of the resources and conditions needed to maintain species viability. We begin the SSA with an understanding of the species’ unique life history, and from that we evaluate the biological requirements of individuals, populations, and species using the principles of population resiliency, species redundancy, and species representation. All three concepts (or analogous ones) apply at both the population and species levels, and are explained that way below for simplicity and clarity as we introduce them. The striped newt is a small salamander that uses ephemeral wetlands and the upland habitat (scrub, mesic flatwoods, and sandhills) that surrounds those wetlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Red-Spotted Newt Fact Sheet
    WILDLIFE IN CONNECTICUT WILDLIFE FACT SHEET DENNIS QUINN Eastern Red-spotted Newt Notophthalmus v. viridescens Background and Range The red-spotted newt (also commonly referred to as the eastern newt) is widespread and familiar in many areas of Connecticut. Newts have four distinct life stages: egg, aquatic larvae, terrestrial juvenial (or “eft”), and aquatic adult. Their life cycle is one of the most complex of all the salamanders; starting as an egg, hatching into a larvae with external gills, then migrating to terrestrial habitats as juveniles where gills are replaced with lungs, and returning a few years later to their aquatic habitats as adults which retain their lungs. In Connecticut, the newt is found statewide, but more prominently west of the Connecticut River. The red-spotted newt has many subspecies and an extensive range throughout the United States. Description The adult red-spotted newt has smooth skin that is overall greenish in color, with small black dots scattered on the back and a row of several black-bordered reddish-orange spots on each side of the back. Male newts have black rough patches on the inside of their thighs and on the bottom tip of their hind toes during the breeding season. Adult newts are usually 3 to 5 inches in length. The juvenile, or eft, stage of the red-spotted newt is bright orange in color with small black dots scattered on the back and a row of larger, black-bordered orange spots on each side of the back. The skin is rough and dry compared to the moist and smooth skin of adults and larvae.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Defense of the Eastern Newt (Notophthalmus Viridescens): Variation in Efficiency Against Different Consumers and in Different Habitats
    Chemical Defense of the Eastern Newt (Notophthalmus viridescens): Variation in Efficiency against Different Consumers and in Different Habitats Zachary H. Marion1,2, Mark E. Hay1* 1 School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America, 2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America Abstract Amphibian secondary metabolites are well known chemically, but their ecological functions are poorly understood—even for well-studied species. For example, the eastern newt (Notophthalmus viridescens) is a well known secretor of tetrodotoxin (TTX), with this compound hypothesized to facilitate this salamander’s coexistence with a variety of aquatic consumers across the eastern United States. However, this assumption of chemical defense is primarily based on observational data with low replication against only a few predator types. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that N. viridescens is chemically defended against co-occurring fishes, invertebrates, and amphibian generalist predators and that this defense confers high survivorship when newts are transplanted into both fish-containing and fishless habitats. We found that adult eastern newts were unpalatable to predatory fishes (Micropterus salmoides, Lepomis macrochirus) and a crayfish (Procambarus clarkii), but were readily consumed by bullfrogs (Lithobates catesbeianus). The eggs and neonate larvae were also unpalatable to fish (L. macrochirus). Bioassay-guided fractionation confirmed that deterrence is chemical and that ecologically relevant concentrations of TTX would deter feeding. Despite predatory fishes rejecting eastern newts in laboratory assays, field experiments demonstrated that tethered newts suffered high rates of predation in fish-containing ponds. We suggest that this may be due to predation by amphibians (frogs) and reptiles (turtles) that co-occur with fishes rather than from fishes directly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Salamanders of Tennessee
    Salamanders of Tennessee: modified from Lisa Powers tnwildlife.org Follow links to Nongame The Salamanders of Tennessee Photo by John White Salamanders are the group of tailed, vertebrate animals that along with frogs and caecilians make up the class Amphibia. Salamanders are ectothermic (cold-blooded), have smooth glandular skin, lack claws and must have a moist environment in which to live. 1 Amphibian Declines Worldwide, over 200 amphibian species have experienced recent population declines. Scientists have reports of 32 species First discovered in 1967, the golden extinctions, toad, Bufo periglenes, was last seen mainly species of in 1987. frogs. Much attention has been given to the Anurans (frogs) in recent years, however salamander populations have been poorly monitored. Photo by Henk Wallays Fire Salamander - Salamandra salamandra terrestris 2 Why The Concern For Salamanders in Tennessee? Their key role and high densities in many forests The stability in their counts and populations Their vulnerability to air and water pollution Their sensitivity as a measure of change The threatened and endangered status of several species Their inherent beauty and appeal as a creature to study and conserve. *Possible Factors Influencing Declines Around the World Climate Change Habitat Modification Habitat Fragmentation Introduced Species UV-B Radiation Chemical Contaminants Disease Trade in Amphibians as Pets *Often declines are caused by a combination of factors and do not have a single cause. Major Causes for Declines in Tennessee Habitat Modification -The destruction of natural habitats is undoubtedly the biggest threat facing amphibians in Tennessee. Housing, shopping center, industrial and highway construction are all increasing throughout the state and consequently decreasing the amount of available habitat for amphibians.
    [Show full text]
  • Key to the Identification of Streamside Salamanders
    Key to the Identification of Streamside Salamanders Ambystoma spp., mole salamanders (Family Ambystomatidae) Appearance : Medium to large stocky salamanders. Large round heads with bulging eyes . Larvae are also stocky and have elaborate gills. Size: 3-8” (Total length). Spotted salamander, Ambystoma maculatum Habitat: Burrowers that spend much of their life below ground in terrestrial habitats. Some species, (e.g. marbled salamander) may be found under logs or other debris in riparian areas. All species breed in fishless isolated ponds or wetlands. Range: Statewide. Other: Five species in Georgia. This group includes some of the largest and most dramatically patterned terrestrial species. Marbled salamander, Ambystoma opacum Amphiuma spp., amphiuma (Family Amphiumidae) Appearance: Gray to black, eel-like bodies with four greatly reduced, non-functional legs (A). Size: up to 46” (Total length) Habitat: Lakes, ponds, ditches and canals, one species is found in deep pockets of mud along the Apalachicola River floodplains. A Range: Southern half of the state. Other: One species, the two-toed amphiuma ( A. means ), shown on the right, is known to occur in A. pholeter southern Georgia; a second species, ,Two-toed amphiuma, Amphiuma means may occur in extreme southwest Georgia, but has yet to be confirmed. The two-toed amphiuma (shown in photo) has two diminutive toes on each of the front limbs. Cryptobranchus alleganiensis , hellbender (Family Cryptobranchidae) Appearance: Very large, wrinkled salamander with eyes positioned laterally (A). Brown-gray in color with darker splotches Size: 12-29” (Total length) A Habitat: Large, rocky, fast-flowing streams. Often found beneath large rocks in shallow rapids. Range: Extreme northern Georgia only.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation Into Tetrodotoxin (TTX) Levels Associated with the Red Dorsal Spots in Eastern Newt (Notophthalmus Viridescens)Eftsandadults
    Hindawi Journal of Toxicology Volume 2018, Article ID 9196865, 4 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9196865 Research Article An Investigation into Tetrodotoxin (TTX) Levels Associated with the Red Dorsal Spots in Eastern Newt (Notophthalmus viridescens)EftsandAdults Mackenzie M. Spicer,1 Amber N. Stokes,2 Trevor L. Chapman,3 Edmund D. Brodie Jr,4 Edmund D. Brodie III,5 and Brian G. Gall 6 1 Department of Pharmacology, Te University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA 2Department of Biology, California State University, Bakersfeld, CA 93311, USA 3Department of Biology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA 4Department of Biology, Utah State University, 5305 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322, USA 5Department of Biology, University of Virginia, PO Box 400328, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA 6Department of Biology, Hanover College, 517 Ball Drive, Hanover, IN 47243, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Brian G. Gall; [email protected] Received 31 May 2018; Accepted 16 August 2018; Published 2 September 2018 Academic Editor: Syed Ali Copyright © 2018 Mackenzie M. Spicer et al. Tis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. We investigated the concentration of tetrodotoxin (TTX) in sections of skin containing and lacking red dorsal spots in both Eastern newt (Notophthalmus viridescens) efs and adults. Several other species, such as Pleurodeles waltl and Echinotriton andersoni, have granular glands concentrated in brightly pigmented regions on the dorsum, and thus we hypothesized that the red dorsal spots of Eastern newts may also possess higher levels of TTX than the surrounding skin.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2021 Spring Creative Ways Ways Creative
    ACADIA 43 Cottage Street, PO Box 45 Bar Harbor, ME 04609 SPRING 2021 Volume 26 No. 2 SPRING 2021 Volume The Friends of Acadia Journal SPRING 2021 MISSION Friends of Acadia preserves, protects, and promotes stewardship of the outstanding natural beauty, ecological vitality, and distinctive cultural resources of Acadia National Park and surrounding communities for the inspiration and enjoyment of current and future generations. VISITORS enjoy a game of cribbage while watching the sunset from Beech Mountain. ACADIA OPENS RESERVATION CREATIVE WAYS FOR THE 2021 SEASON SYSTEM TO SUPPORT ACADIA TO IMPROVE VISITOR EXPERIENCE ASHLEY L. CONTI/FOA friendsofacadia.org | 43 Cottage Street | PO Box 45 | Bar Harbor, ME | 04609 | 207-288-3340 | 800 - 625- 0321 PURCHASE YOUR PARK PASS! Whether walking, bicycling, riding the Island Explorer, or driving through the park, we all must obtain a park pass. Eighty percent of all fees paid in Acadia National Park stay in Acadia, to be used for projects that directly benefit park visitors and resources. BUY A PASS ONLINE AND PRINT Acadia National Park passes are available online: before you arrive at the park. This www.recreation.gov/sitepass/74271 allows you to drive directly to a Annual park passes are also available at trailhead/parking area & display certain Acadia-area town offices and local your pass from your vehicle. chambers of commerce. Visit www.nps.gov/acad/planyourvisit/fees.htm IN THIS ISSUE 10 8 12 20 18 FEATURES 6 REMEMBERING DIANNA EMORY Our Friend, Conservationist, and Defender of Acadia By David
    [Show full text]
  • Streamside Salamander Identification Guide
    Key to the Identification of Streamside Salamanders 1 Ambystoma spp., mole salamanders (Family Ambystomatidae) Appearance: Medium to large stocky salamanders. Large round heads with bulging eyes. Larvae are also stocky and have elaborate gills. Size: 3-8” (Total length). Spotted salamander, Ambystoma maculatum Habitat: Burrowers that spend much of their life below ground in terrestrial habitats. Some species, (e.g. marbled salamander) may be found under logs or other debris in riparian areas. All species breed in fishless isolated ponds or wetlands. Range: Statewide. Other: Five species in Georgia. This group includes some of the largest and most dramatically patterned terrestrial species. Marbled salamander, Ambystoma opacum Amphiuma spp., amphiuma (Family Amphiumidae) Appearance: Gray to black, eel-like bodies with four greatly reduced, non-functional legs (A). Size: up to 46” (Total length) Habitat: Lakes, ponds, ditches and canals, one species is found in deep pockets of mud along the Apalachicola River floodplains. A Range: Southern half of the state. A Other: One species, the two-toed amphiuma (A. means), shown on the right, is known to occur in A. pholeter southern Georgia; a second species, ,Two-toed amphiuma, Amphiuma means may occur in extreme southwest Georgia, but has yet to be confirmed. The two-toed amphiuma (shown in photo) has two diminutive toes on each of the front limbs. 2 Cryptobranchus alleganiensis, hellbender (Family Cryptobranchidae) Appearance: Very large, wrinkled salamander with eyes positioned laterally (A). Brown-gray in color with darker splotches Size: 12-29” (Total length) A Habitat: Large, rocky, fast-flowing streams. Often found beneath large rocks in shallow rapids.
    [Show full text]
  • Have Salamanders Declined in Ontario?
    Have salamanders declined in Ontario? David C Seburn1 Erin Mallon2 1Seburn Ecological Services 2710 Clarenda St, Ottawa, Ontario, K2B 7S5 2Ontario Nature 214 King Street West, Suite 612, Toronto, ON M5H 3S6 Prepared for Ontario Wildlife Foundation Ottawa Field-Naturalists’ Club October 2015 Abstract Amphibians are known to be declining around the world. Although most affected species are frogs, salamanders are declining as well. The Ontario Reptile and Amphibian Atlas (ORAA) is a citizen science project that tracks reptiles and amphibians across the province over time. Data from the ORAA indicate that salamanders are absent from many historical areas of Ontario. This result could be from a true decline or a lack of recent observations from many areas. To test this we conducted surveys for salamanders in 25 historical 10x10 km grid squares across eastern Ontario. Result highlights: Checked 3876 cover objects in 25 grid squares Confirmed Red-backed Salamanders present in 21 of 25 (84%) squares surveyed Found 202 individual salamanders of 6 different species 90% of salamanders found were Red-backed Salamanders The median number of cover objects checked to detect a species varied from 34 for Red-backed Salamanders to >100 for Blue-spotted and Spotted Salamanders Found up to 3 species of salamanders per square Provided the first recent records for Spotted Salamanders in 4 squares, and for Blue-spotted and Two-lined Salamanders in 1 square Provided the first records ever for 4 species of salamander in 5 squares Our results strongly suggest that lack of survey effort explains much of the apparent decline of salamanders in eastern Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles & Crocodilians
    STANDARD COMMON AND CURRENT SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR NORTH AMERICAN AMPHIBIANS, TURTLES, REPTILES & CROCODILIANS Sixth Edition Joseph T. Collins TraVis W. TAGGart The Center for North American Herpetology THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY www.cnah.org Joseph T. Collins, Director The Center for North American Herpetology 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 (785) 393-4757 Single copies of this publication are available gratis from The Center for North American Herpetology, 1502 Medinah Circle, Lawrence, Kansas 66047 USA; within the United States and Canada, please send a self-addressed 7x10-inch manila envelope with sufficient U.S. first class postage affixed for four ounces. Individuals outside the United States and Canada should contact CNAH via email before requesting a copy. A list of previous editions of this title is printed on the inside back cover. THE CEN T ER FOR NOR T H AMERI ca N HERPE T OLOGY BO A RD OF DIRE ct ORS Joseph T. Collins Suzanne L. Collins Kansas Biological Survey The Center for The University of Kansas North American Herpetology 2021 Constant Avenue 1502 Medinah Circle Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Lawrence, Kansas 66047 Kelly J. Irwin James L. Knight Arkansas Game & Fish South Carolina Commission State Museum 915 East Sevier Street P. O. Box 100107 Benton, Arkansas 72015 Columbia, South Carolina 29202 Walter E. Meshaka, Jr. Robert Powell Section of Zoology Department of Biology State Museum of Pennsylvania Avila University 300 North Street 11901 Wornall Road Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Kansas City, Missouri 64145 Travis W. Taggart Sternberg Museum of Natural History Fort Hays State University 3000 Sternberg Drive Hays, Kansas 67601 Front cover images of an Eastern Collared Lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) and Cajun Chorus Frog (Pseudacris fouquettei) by Suzanne L.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2, Chapter 14-8: Salamander Mossy Habitats
    Glime, J. M. and Boelema, W. J. 2017. Salamander Mossy Habitats. Chapt. 14-8. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 2. 14-8-1 Bryological Interaction.Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 19 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology2/>. CHAPTER 14-8 SALAMANDER MOSSY HABITATS Janice M. Glime and William J. Boelema TABLE OF CONTENTS Tropical Mossy Habitats – Plethodontidae........................................................................................................ 14-8-3 Terrestrial and Arboreal Adaptations ......................................................................................................... 14-8-3 Bolitoglossa (Tropical Climbing Salamanders) ......................................................................................... 14-8-4 Bolitoglossa diaphora ................................................................................................................................ 14-8-5 Bolitoglossa diminuta (Quebrada Valverde Salamander) .......................................................................... 14-8-5 Bolitoglossa hartwegi (Hartweg's Mushroomtongue Salamander) ............................................................ 14-8-5 Bolitoglossa helmrichi ............................................................................................................................... 14-8-5 Bolitoglossa jugivagans ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]