DOCSLIB.ORG

Folios, Quartos & Publishing Folios, Quartos, and Publishing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Folios, Quartos & Publishing Folios, Quartos, and Publishing The English Renaissance in Context: Folios, Quartos & Publishing Folios, Quartos, and Publishing Publishing & Piracy The quarto shown here is a fake! The title page states that it was printed “I. Roberts” [James Roberts] in 1600. But, it was actually set from a copy of the first quarto edition (Q1,1600) in 1619 by William Jaggard for Thomas Pavier. In fact, the supposed printer, James Roberts, was already dead at the time of this quarto’s printing. This edition of Merchant – called the second quarto (Q2)—is one of nine notorious editions of Shakespeare’s plays printed in an unauthorized and aborted effort to capitalize on Shakespeare’s renown shortly after his death in 1616. University of Pennsylvania Libraries - 1 - Furness Shakespeare Collection The English Renaissance in Context: Folios, Quartos & Publishing Penn’s Horace Howard Furness Library owns two more of the nine “Pavier Quartos,” King Lear and Henry V. Seventeenth-century book buyers often bound Pavier’s texts together, ironically allowing more copies of these forgeries to survive than any other early quarto editions of Shakespeare. What we would today consider a violation of intellectual property rights has given us several irreplaceable Shakespearean texts. These quartos are sources of important alternative readings of words and lines. Pavier and Jaggard had already printed and sold, as Shakespeare’s, plays that modern scholars omit from the canon of Shakespeare’s works. The concept of copyright was not yet established in their day, although the Stationer’s Company maintained a registry for print publications. If a printer-bookseller wanted to publish a text, he had to pay to secure his right to do so via the Stationer’s Register. Pavier and Jaggard did not own the rights to Merchant of Venice. Perhaps they printed it anyway—along with King Lear and A Midsummer Night’s Dream—to shore up the lightweight list of Shakespearean and pseudo-Shakespearean dramatic works whose rights they did own: The Whole Contention, Pericles, the Yorkshire Tragedy, Sir John Oldcastle, and a version of Henry V. The spurious publication date of 1600 lends an air of authenticity to the enterprise. University of Pennsylvania Libraries - 2 - Furness Shakespeare Collection The English Renaissance in Context: Folios, Quartos & Publishing ? If a text was printed in 1619, rather than in 1600, should we be less likely to trust its accuracy? ? If a later, somewhat suspect edition contains words or lines that seem preferable to their counterparts in an earlier, “authentic” edition, should we treat them as Shakespearean? ? How does this glimpse of the early modern book trade affect our sense of the Shakespearean text? To add insult to injury, someone has written all over the text. ? Who would do such a thing? An actor? A director? An editor? And Why? ? How do these marks on Merchant differ from those on these acting copies of Romeo and Juliet and Hamlet? ? What is being noted or corrected? ? Is this reader proofreading, or doing something else? University of Pennsylvania Libraries - 3 - Furness Shakespeare Collection The English Renaissance in Context: Folios, Quartos & Publishing The culprit is known. He is Edward Capell, a noted 18th century editor of Shakespeare’s works. And he, too, was trying to figure out just what he was looking at. Capell (1713- 1781) worked for the Lord Chamberlain’s Office from 1749 on, reviewing plays for licensing by the British government. He published an octavo edition of Shakespeare’s works in 1768. A commentary appeared separately in 1774. As an editor of Shakespeare, Capell took what was then a revolutionary approach. Instead of basing his edition on the “received” text (the text produced most recently by his contemporaries), Capell returned to the oldest texts he could find, typically favoring quartos produced during Shakespeare’s lifetime over the First Folio and other posthumously produced editions. Capell urged Shakespeare scholars “to look into the other old editions, and to select from thence whatever improves the Author or contributes to his advancement in perfectness.” ? What kind of “perfectness” is Capell seeking after? ? Can sampling pieces of several texts result in an “improved” whole? University of Pennsylvania Libraries - 4 - Furness Shakespeare Collection The English Renaissance in Context: Folios, Quartos & Publishing ? Is such a text closer to, or farther from, what Shakespeare wrote? From what his acting company performed? ? What differences does it make to choose among these texts? ? Which would be more likely to contain errors of some kind? And is Shakespeare always perfect? The Pavier quartos at Penn provide a record of how an influential editor worked. Each has markings by Capell, usually word-by-word comparisons—called collations—with other quarto editions or with the First Folio. These differences are called variants. Capell did not know that the edition he was working on, the one dated 1600 for marketing purposes, but actually printed in 1619, was actually a back-dated counterfeit. His notations show that he thought he was comparing three texts, including two distinct 1600 editions, and trying to ascertain the relationship between his copy and others. The red and black ink throughout the text indicates variants, places where he found his copy to depart from the (authentic) Q1 of 1600 and from another edition of 1637. A fly-leaf inserted at the back of the Merchant, dated 1749, explains Capell’s process, and includes a drawing of the title page of an authentic First Quarto of the play. ? What differences do you see between the copied 1600 title page and this edition’s printed one? ? Even after all that comparative work, Capell still used the First Folio version of Merchant as the basis for his own edition of the play. University of Pennsylvania Libraries - 5 - Furness Shakespeare Collection The English Renaissance in Context: Folios, Quartos & Publishing ? Why would he make such a choice? ? Modern editors for the most part have preferred the First Quarto for the task. What is gained or lost with either decision? ? Do you think that Capell would have made different decision if he had known that his copy of Merchant of Venice wasn’t “as advertised”? ? What does the saga of Thomas Pavier and Edward Capell tell you about the role that publishers and editors played then, and still play now, in the production of the “meaning” of a text? ? Of this text? University of Pennsylvania Libraries - 6 - Furness Shakespeare Collection .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lost Incunable Editions: Closing in on an Estimate
    chapter 3 Lost Incunable Editions: Closing in on an Estimate Jonathan Green and Frank McIntyre Imagine, if you will, that you are a lepidopterist stationed in the butterfly-rich environment of a tropical Malaysian island. You hope to determine the number of butterfly species that live on the island, and so you resolve to survey an acre- sized patch of it for a month and record the number of individuals of each spe- cies that you find. At the end of the month, you find that a few species of butterfly are represented by a large number of specimens, while many species are repre- sented by only one or a few specimens. These results lead you to suspect that there remain many species of butterfly on the island that your survey has missed, but how many? And how many more species can you expect to discover with additional months of observation? As your opportunity to spend additional months on a tropical island depends on your presenting a convincing argument to your funding agency, these questions are of some urgency for you. This is a brief statement of what is known as the unseen species problem, which has been an area of intense study both within and well outside of the field of ecology for several decades. The example above concerning Malaysian butterflies is drawn from a pathbreaking article published in 1943 by Ronald Fisher, one of the founders of modern biology and statistics, who proposed statistical methods for estimating the number of unseen butterfly species.1 Since then, the development and implementation of these methods has con- tinued, so that several current statistical software packages can provide both an estimate of the number of missing species and determine the confidence interval of that estimation, that is, the range within which one is reasonably certain the actual number lies.2 In an ideal situation, the number of observed butterfly species will rise with each additional month of observation, but the estimate of total species will change only modestly as the confidence interval 1 R.A.
    [Show full text]
  • (1604) In/As Print
    Early Theatre 20.1 (2017), 43–76 http://dx.doi.org/10.12745/et.20.1.2830 Heather C. Easterling Reading the Royal Entry (1604) in/as Print King James I’s March 1604 entry into London, many recognize, departs from previ- ous royal entry pageants through its use of triumphal arches, employment of profes- sional dramatists, and emphasis on dialogue. But the 1604 entry also was notable for its essential print identity. Print records of royal entries were common by the time of Elizabeth’s accession, and the 1559 text commemorated the event mainly for the queen and court, listing no author. By contrast, James’s entry, staged and performed over one day, generated four different printed texts, each with a declared author or authors. This article considers how all four entry texts together produce a highly contested portrait of ideas about print, authorship, and authority at the outset of the Jacobean period. Oxford’s monumental Thomas Middleton: The Complete Works, dense not only with plays but also with lord mayor’s shows and essays on the spectacles they scripted, offers vivid evidence of new interest in early modern pageantry. Schol- arly reassessments of long neglected public pageantry have newly considered the significance, in their own time and in ours, of such performances, including royal entries.1 As Richard Dutton has argued: To ignore the civic pageants of the Tudor and Stuart period is to ignore the one form of drama which we know must have been familiar to all the citizens of London, and thus an important key to our understanding of those times and of the place of dramatic spectacle in early modern negotiations of national, civic, and personal identity.2 Dutton signals a critical investment that Tracey Hill further enunciates, arguing that we must assess early modern lord mayor’s shows precisely for their public and complexly collaborative nature as spectacles.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Print and Publishing Service Solutions for International Publishers
    GLOBAL PRINT AND PUBLISHING SERVICE SOLUTIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHERS If you ship inventory to a common distribution facility in the United States, it’s time you considered partnering with a U.S. printer that can place your publications in the hands of your readers quickly and economically. The companies of CJK Group, Inc. offer a complete range of services including web, sheetfed, inkjet, and toner printing (all the way down to a single copy), as well as warehousing and fulfillment. CJK Group, Inc., headquartered in Brainerd, MN, is a national portfolio of print and publishing-related BANG PRINTING services, and technologies serving book, magazine, catalog, and journal publishers. All CJK Group companies operate independently, while sharing best practices HESS PRINT SOLUTIONS and core values across the organization. CJK Group is comprised of six companies with 11 production locations across the United States. Those companies are: Bang SENTINEL PRINTING COMPANY Printing, Hess Print Solutions, Sentinel Printing Company, Sheridan, Sinclair Printing Company, and Webcrafters, Inc. SHERIDAN When you partner with a CJK Group Company, you will find that our experienced employees are not only committed to delivering a high quality product on time, they ensure SINCLAIR PRINTING COMPANY that you understand the processes too – including the terminology used in the United States – so the product you receive matches your expectations. WEBCRAFTERS, INC Here is a handy guide to understanding printing terms, trim sizes, and text weights in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Jest-Book Formation Through the Early Modern Printing Industry
    Title Jest-book formation through the early modern printing industry: the two different editions of Scoggin's Jests Sub Title 二つのScoggin's Jests : 異なる版が語ること Author 小町谷, 尚子(Komachiya, Naoko) Publisher 慶應義塾大学日吉紀要刊行委員会 Publication year 2014 Jtitle 慶應義塾大学日吉紀要. 英語英米文学 (The Hiyoshi review of English studies). No.65 (2014. 10) ,p.45- 85 Abstract Notes Genre Departmental Bulletin Paper URL https://koara.lib.keio.ac.jp/xoonips/modules/xoonips/detail.php?koara_id=AN10030060-2014103 1-0045 慶應義塾大学学術情報リポジトリ(KOARA)に掲載されているコンテンツの著作権は、それぞれの著作者、学会または出版社/発行者に帰属し、その権利は著作権法によって 保護されています。引用にあたっては、著作権法を遵守してご利用ください。 The copyrights of content available on the KeiO Associated Repository of Academic resources (KOARA) belong to the respective authors, academic societies, or publishers/issuers, and these rights are protected by the Japanese Copyright Act. When quoting the content, please follow the Japanese copyright act. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Jest-book Formation through the Early Modern Printing Industry: The Two Different Editions of Scoggin’s Jests Naoko Komachiya The confusion and conflation of differently originated jester figures date back to Shakespeare’s time. Scoggin’s Jests is often seen as the primary source of jesting material along with Tarlton’s Jests. The apparent identity of these jests with named figures somewhat obscured the true identity of jesters.1) Modern editors identify the socially ambiguous jester Scoggin in Shallow’s episodic recollection of Falstaff, who breaks ‘Scoggin’s head at the court gate’ in Henry IV, Part 2 (III. 2. 28–29), as the jester to Edward IV. René Weis, in explaining that Scoggin’s name was ‘synonymous with “buffoon” in Shakespeare’s day through a mid sixteenth-century jestbook, Scoggin, his iestes’, comments that the reference demonstrates that ‘even the young Falstaff was always brawling with various buffoons’.2) Weis and other editors simply deduce that Shakespeare’s misunderstanding resulted from the circulated name of Scoggin, and they do not show any evidence how the conflation occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarto Publishing Group USA and Arcadia Publishing Announce a US Distribution Agreement
    Quarto Publishing Group USA and Arcadia Publishing announce a US distribution agreement Beverly, MA—Quarto Publishing Group USA, part of The Quarto Group, the leading global illustrated book publisher, and Arcadia Publishing, the largest US publisher of local and regional books, are pleased to announce a US distribution agreement for select Quarto imprints. Arcadia Publishing will be distributing Quarto’s Voyageur Press and Cool Springs Press titles into specialty garden, home improvement and hardware accounts. “I’ve long admired Arcadia’s reach into local markets across the US. Arcadia Publishing has been the shining example of successful distribution into specialty markets. With thousands of active accounts, there is no town too small or too far that their team doesn’t reach,” explained Tara Catogge, VP Sales Director at Quarto Publishing Group USA. “We see a lot of growth opportunity by combining Arcadia’s exceptional field sales force and focused market strategy with Quarto’s expansive regional title list and bestselling garden and branded home- improvement titles.” “As part of our rapid expansion into specialty markets we were looking for a partner to help us reach those small and often remote retailers that are the core market for our garden and home- improvement lists,” said Ken Fund, President and CEO of Quarto Publishing Group, “and we found it in Arcadia. Their publishing and sales team is uniquely skilled at reaching and serving the needs of small business owners in micro markets. Their business model is about immediacy and the art of hand-selling which they do exceptionally well.” Richard Joseph, owner and CEO of Arcadia Publishing, commented, “Arcadia is committed to increasing the availability, depth and breadth of local books, and this distribution partnership with Quarto Publishing Group is a perfect fit with our publishing program.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Quarto of King Henry V Edited by Andrew Gurr Excerpt More Information
    Cambridge University Press 0521623367 - The First Quarto of King Henry V Edited by Andrew Gurr Excerpt More information 1 Introduction INTRODUCTION The significance of the quarto text of Henry V The character of the text of Henry V printed in the First Folio of 1623 (f) is not seriously in doubt. As the NCS edition and others argue, it was set from an authorial manuscript that had not been through the developmental process of emendation for performance. The version printed in 1600 (q), however, tells a different story. It contains several features that show radical corrections made to the f text either in the course of preparing the play for performance or during its first run on stage. It cuts the total number of lines by a half, eliminating entire scenes and transposing others, and shortens or cuts all the longer speeches. The speed with which it came to the press only a year after its first staging is a mark both of its proximity to the text performed by the company that owned it and of its authority as an official version. Between 1598 and 1600 ten plays owned by Shakespeare’s company came into print, seven of them Shakespeare’s own. With the sole exception of the Henry V quarto, and Jonson’s Every Man Out of his Humour, which Jonson gave to the press himself, all of them were at least three years old. In the speed of its delivery to the press, q Henry V is unique even among the so-called ‘bad’ quartos. What its text can tell us about its origins and its intended function is uniquely valuable for an understanding of what Shakespeare’s company did to adapt the play-manuscripts he sold to them for staging.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Unrecorded Incunables: Rouen, Circa 1497, and Lyons, Circa 1500
    TWO UNRECORDED INCUNABLES: ROUEN, CIRCA 1497, AND LYONS, CIRCA 1500 DAVID J.SHAW FOR a number of years, I have been re-examining the British Library's books printed in France between 1501 and 1520 for a typographical catalogue of the Library's French post-incunables. This catalogue is a revision of the unpublished manuscript of Col. Frank Isaac's Index to the British [Museum] Library's books printed in France between 1501 and 1520 which remained incomplete at his death in 1943. The Indexes of books printed between 1501 and 1520 were started by Robert Proctor, who pubUshed the volume for Germany in 1903 as an outgrowth from his incunable catalogue, and were continued by Isaac for Italy (published in 1938)^ and for France (unpublished).^ As with the incunable catalogues, these Indexes are arranged according to Proctor's methodology - by place of printing, then by printer, and for each printer the books are hsted in chronological order. The main function of the work is to attribute unsigned books to their printer when possible and to order the production of each workshop chronologically, assigning dates where necessary. As with the incunable catalogues, a large part of this task involves the identification and classification of each printer's typographical material. I have tried to extend this aspect of the work, so that the finished catalogue should present important new evidence on the supply of type in France in the early sixteenth century and on its use in the printing-houses of the time. The undated books pose problems at both ends of the chronological span.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir John Oldcastle and the Construction of Shakespeare's
    SEL38 (1998) ISSN 0039-3657 SirJohn Oldcastle and the Construction of Shakespeare's Authorship DOUGLAS A. BROOKS Let vs returne vnto the Bench againe, And there examine further of this fray. -SirJohn Oldcastle, I.i.124-5 A decade ago the editors of the Oxford William Shakespeare: The CompleteWorks replaced the name of the character called Falstaff in Henry IVPart Iwith a hypothetically earlier version of the character's name, Sir John Oldcastle. The restoration of Oldcastle to the Oxford edition makes it the first authoritative text to undo an alteration which, as scholars have long suspected, Shakespeare himself must have made sometime between a non-extant 1596 performance text and the 1598 quarto of the play. The resulting scholarly debate over this editorial decision has touched on a number of significant issues linked to the authority and authenticity of "Shakespearean" texts, and it has raised important questions about how these texts were shaped by the material, religious, and political conditions in which they were produced.l In the case of HenryIVPart I, crit- ics have struggled to reconstruct how an early version of the text with Oldcastle as the protagonist of the unworthy knight plot might have placed the play and its author in a complicated Douglas A. Brooks recently completed his Ph.D. at Columbia University, and is assistant professor of Shakespeare and Renaissance Drama at Texas A&M University. He is currently working on a book about early modern dramatic authorship and print. 334 SIR JOHN OLDCASTLE position between an individual's reputation and a nation's.
    [Show full text]
  • Schuler Dissertation Final Document
    COUNSEL, POLITICAL RHETORIC, AND THE CHRONICLE HISTORY PLAY: REPRESENTING COUNCILIAR RULE, 1588-1603 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Anne-Marie E. Schuler, B.M., M.A. Graduate Program in English The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Professor Richard Dutton, Advisor Professor Luke Wilson Professor Alan B. Farmer Professor Jennifer Higginbotham Copyright by Anne-Marie E. Schuler 2011 ABSTRACT This dissertation advances an account of how the genre of the chronicle history play enacts conciliar rule, by reflecting Renaissance models of counsel that predominated in Tudor political theory. As the texts of Renaissance political theorists and pamphleteers demonstrate, writers did not believe that kings and queens ruled by themselves, but that counsel was required to ensure that the monarch ruled virtuously and kept ties to the actual conditions of the people. Yet, within these writings, counsel was not a singular concept, and the work of historians such as John Guy, Patrick Collinson, and Ann McLaren shows that “counsel” referred to numerous paradigms and traditions. These theories of counsel were influenced by a variety of intellectual movements including humanist-classical formulations of monarchy, constitutionalism, and constructions of a “mixed monarchy” or a corporate body politic. Because the rhetoric of counsel was embedded in the language that men and women used to discuss politics, I argue that the plays perform a kind of cultural work, usually reserved for literature, that reflects, heightens, and critiques political life and the issues surrounding conceptions of conciliar rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Redating Pericles: a Re-Examination of Shakespeare’S
    REDATING PERICLES: A RE-EXAMINATION OF SHAKESPEARE’S PERICLES AS AN ELIZABETHAN PLAY A THESIS IN Theatre Presented to the Faculty of the University of Missouri-Kansas City in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS by Michelle Elaine Stelting University of Missouri Kansas City December 2015 © 2015 MICHELLE ELAINE STELTING ALL RIGHTS RESERVED REDATING PERICLES: A RE-EXAMINATION OF SHAKESPEARE’S PERICLES AS AN ELIZABETHAN PLAY Michelle Elaine Stelting, Candidate for the Master of Arts Degree University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2015 ABSTRACT Pericles's apparent inferiority to Shakespeare’s mature works raises many questions for scholars. Was Shakespeare collaborating with an inferior playwright or playwrights? Did he allow so many corrupt printed versions of his works after 1604 out of indifference? Re-dating Pericles from the Jacobean to the Elizabethan era answers these questions and reveals previously unexamined connections between topical references in Pericles and events and personalities in the court of Elizabeth I: John Dee, Philip Sidney, Edward de Vere, and many others. The tournament impresas, alchemical symbolism of the story, and its lunar and astronomical imagery suggest Pericles was written long before 1608. Finally, Shakespeare’s focus on father-daughter relationships, and the importance of Marina, the daughter, as the heroine of the story, point to Pericles as written for a young girl. This thesis uses topical references, Shakespeare’s anachronisms, Shakespeare’s sources, stylometry and textual analysis, as well as Henslowe’s diary, the Stationers' Register, and other contemporary documentary evidence to determine whether there may have been versions of Pericles circulating before the accepted date of 1608.
    [Show full text]
  • The Octavo Package Stefan A
    TUGboat, Volume 23 (2002), No. 3/4 269 The Octavo Package Stefan A. Revets Abstract The Octavo package is a modification of the standard LATEX book class, written to help produce books of clas- sical design, format and layout. The page sizes made available are the classical octavo sizes and the margins are calculated according to late Gothic precepts. An at- tempt is made to maintain the uniformity of the printing grid, and display is kept unobtrusive. − − ∗ − − 1 Introduction Donald Knuth developed TEX because of his grow- ing dissatisfaction with the commercial typesetting of his books `The Art of Computer Programming' [4]. The program grew into a typesetting system, with a great deal of attention and ingenuity devoted to the calculations of the placement of letters, words and paragraphs on the page. The preface of the TEXbook begins with the words `This is a handbook about TEX, a new typesetting system intended for the creation of beautiful books . ' [3]. More people began to use TEX, and, with the advent of LATEX, ready-made class files became part of the system. The standard style and class files tended to show off the capabilities of the system, rather than con- form to good design. Philip Taylor put it with some humour and considerable precision: `Knuth, in his closing exhortation, wrote: \Go forth now and create masterpieces of the publishing art." Nowhere, so far as I can trace, did he write: \and let every one of them shriek `TEX' from every page". ' [9]. Class files have been proposed and are available from CTAN which give the more fastidious user the means with which to moderate at least some of the excesses of these standard LATEX styles.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ecocritical and Performance History of King Lear. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2017
    Hamilton, Jennifer Mae. "Bibliography." This Contentious Storm: An Ecocritical and Performance History of King Lear. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2017. 199–222. Environmental Cultures. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 29 Sep. 2021. <>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 29 September 2021, 07:34 UTC. Copyright © Jennifer Hamilton 2017. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. Bibliography Manuscripts, Archival Materials, Illustrations and Rare Publications A most true and Lamentable Report, of a great Tempest of haile which fell upon a Village in Kent, called Stockbery, about three myles from Cittingborne, the nineteenth day of June last past. 1590. Whereby was destroyed a great abundance of corn and fruite, to the impoverishing and undoing of divers men inhabiting within the same Village. Thomas Butter, London, 1590. Available at Early English Books Online, http://eebo.chadwyck.com (accessed 12 August 2011). Andersen, Hans Christian. Pictures of Travel: In Sweden amongst the Hartz Mountains, and in Switzerland, with a visit at Charles Dickens’s House. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Company, 1871. Barry, James. King Lear Weeping Over the Dead Body of Cordelia, c. 1776–8. Oil on Canvas, Tate Britain. Available online: http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/barry- king-lear-weeping-over-the-dead-body-of-cordelia-t00556 (accessed 6 October 2010). Craig, Edward Gordon. The Storm in King Lear, 1920. Woodcut. Victoria and Albert Museum, E.1146–1924. Available online: http://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/ O766388/print-the-storm-in-king-lear/ (accessed 6 February 2012).
    [Show full text]