DOCSLIB.ORG

What's That Smell?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
What's That Smell? THE MISSING SENSITIVITY IAN W ONG INFECTIOUS DISEASE AND MICROBIOLOGY REGISTRAR ROYAL HOBART HOSPITAL Case Presentation • 65F presents with headache associated with speech disturbance • Background • T2DM – Metformin • HTN - Perindopril • IUD inserted 20 years ago Case Presentation • Presented with a 3/52 history of headache associated with subjective fevers • Woke up in morning with expressive dysphasia, nausea and vomiting • No clinical sign of • Motor or sensory disturbance • Co-ordination deficits • Meningism MRI Brain Lumbar Puncture Brain Biopsy • No evidence of malignancy • No fungi or bacteria on staining • Histological features consistent with abscess with surrounding gliosis Brain Biopsy Case Presentation • Patient antibiotics subsequently rationalised to metronidazole and ceftriaxone • Resolution of neurological symptoms • Exploratory laparotomy + Diverting colostomy 29/8/14 • Non operative malignancy Case Summary • 65F with 2 cerebral abscess with B.fragilis and Fusobacterium • Secondary to endometrial carcinoma that fistulised to sigmoid colon • Clinically responded to anaerobic antimicrobial therapy Question • Viewpoints on the Brain biopsy comment? “Bacteroides and Fusobacterium are generally susceptible to metronidazole” • Should susceptibility studies be performed? Topics • Anaerobic antimicrobial sensitivity testing (AST) • Challenges of performing testing • Indications • Developments in Anaerobic resistance • Local Data from RHH Anaerobic Infections • Commensal organism of gastro-intestinal tract • Causes of significant infection • Abdomen • Pelvic • Soft Tissue • Brain • Current treatment empirical • Treatment uses broad spectrum Ab • Not target to susceptibility of organism obtain from clinical isolates Indications for Anaerobic AST • Sterile site infections (eg. brain, blood, joint fluid, prosthetic material) • Anaerobic organism which may harbour resistance – B.fragilis • Anaerobic organisms which have unpredictable resistance patterns – Bacteroides sp. Prevotella, Non perfringens Clostridium sp. , Bilophilia, Sutterella, Fusobacterium sp. Brook, I., Wexler, H., & Goldstein, E. (2013). Antianaerobic Antimicrobials: Spectrum and Susceptibility Testing. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 526-546. Indications for Anaerobic AST • Treatment failure • If long term therapy required for anaerobic infection • When drug selection is critical in the management of patient Brook, I., Wexler, H., & Goldstein, E. (2013). Antianaerobic Antimicrobials: Spectrum and Susceptibility Testing. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 526-546. Anaerobic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST) • Despite clear indications anaerobic antimicrobial susceptibility testing not routinely performed in majority of labs • National Survey of USA hospital • 21 % of Hospital lab perform in house anaerobic antimicrobial susceptibility • Reducing rates of AST over time Goldstein, E., Citron, D., Goldman, P., & Goldman, R. (n.d.). National hospital survey of anaerobic culture and susceptibility methods: III. Anaerobe, 68-72. Challenges with Anaerobic AST • Absence of automated identification method for anaerobes prior to MALDI – TOF • Disc diffusion method previously unavailable for anaerobes • Different breakpoints between EUCAST and CLSI Nagy, E., Justesen, U., Eitel, Z., & Urbán, E. (n.d.). Development of EUCAST disk diffusion method for susceptibility testing of the Bacteroides fragilis group isolates. Anaerobe, 65-71. EUCAST vs CLSI Breakpoints Pen Piptaz FOX Clinda Mtz EUCAST Susceptible ≤ 0.25 ≤ 8 NA ≤ 4 ≤ 4 Resistant > 0.5 > 16 NA > 4 > 4 CLSI Susceptible ≤ 0.5 ≤ 32 ≤ 16 ≤ 2 ≤ 8 Intermediate 1 64 32 4 16 Resistant ≥ 2 ≥ 128 ≥ 64 ≥ 8 ≥ 32 Challenges with Anaerobic AST • Technical difficulties • Anaerobic organism slow growing • Specific growth requirement • Anaerobic infection often polymicrobial • Requires separation and resulting in slow turn around times • ID multiple organisms which may not be pathologically relevant The Case for Anaerobic AST • In vitro testing of anaerobic resistance patterns alters clinical outcomes Summary of Results Variable Active Therapy Inactive Therapy p value (n =81) (n=11) 30 day Mortality 13/81 (16%) 5/11 (45%) 0.04 Clinical Failure 18/83 (22%) 9/11 (82%) 0.0002 Microbiology 5/20 (25%) 3/7 (43%) 0.056 Persistence The Case for Anaerobic AST • Changes in Anaerobic resistance patterns • General trend for increase resistance to Clindamycin, Fluroquinolones, Augmentin • Regional variation Patterns of Bacteroides Sp. Resistance in Europe 40. 30. Augmentin 20. Cefoxitin Clindamycin Moxifloxacin 10. 0. 1992 2003 2011 Patterns of Bacteroides sp. Resistance in Europe 100. 75. Pencillin 50. Piperacillin Tazobactam Imipenem 25. Metronidazole 0. 1992 2003 2011 Patterns of Bacteroides sp. Resistance in USA 50 40 30 Clindamycin Cefoxitin 20 Trovafloxacin 10 0 1981-89 1990-99 2000-07 Australian Anaerobic AST • Minimal local data to guide anaerobic antibiotic selection • Last study performed 22 years ago 30 31 Findings of Chen et al. • Bacteroides fragilis group higher rates of antimicrobial resistance • Indole positive B.fragilis sp demonstrated highest rates of resistance • Beta lactam (6% of isolates sensitive to penicillin) • Cephalosporin (52% of isolates sensitive cefoxitin) • Beta-lactamase inhibitor improved Bacteroides sp. susceptibility to beta-lactams (Range 88-100%) 32 Findings of Chen et al. • Rates of anaerobic organism resistance clindamycin and imipenem were low • Clindamycin lowest susceptible group was indole negative B.fragilis sp. 82% isolates susceptible • Imipenem lowest susceptible group was Fusobacterium 88% isolates susceptible • Metronidazole provides good anaerobic coverage except to P.acnes and non sporing Anerobic gram positive bacilli 33 Royal Hobart Hospital AST • 51 Anaerobic isolates from 2014 to 2015 • E test strips used to assess Anaerobic organism susceptibility to Penicillin, Augmentin, Piperacillin- tazobactam and Metronidazole • 1 McFarland standard suspension of the organism was inoculated onto modify brucella agar • Plates were incubated anaerobically at 35°C between 24-72hrs depending on growth • Beta lactamase performed using nitrocefin disc Results 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Results • Anaerococcous sp., Atopobium rimae, Dichelobacter nodusus and Peptostreptococcous anaerobious organisms were susceptible to beta lactams, clindamycin and metronidazole • Fingolida magna susceptible penicillin, Augmentin, Piptaz, Metronidazole but one isolates was highly resistant to clindamycin • Similar picture seen with Peptoniphilus sp. Finegoldia magna and Peptoniphilus sp. Pen Aug Clinda MTZ TZP Finegoldia magna 0.032 0.064 256 0.064 0.016 Peptonphilus harei 0.125 0.064 >256 0.5 0.064 Results Pen Aug Clinda MTZ TZP Porphyromonas sp. >32 0.016 <0.016 <0.016 <0.016 Prevotella oralis >32 1 <0.016 0.032 0.064 Eggethella sp. 1 0.5 0.5 0.064 0.064 • Porphyromonas gingivalis and Prevotella oralis resistant to penicillin • Eggerthella sp. discrepancy between EUCAST and CLSI whether penicillin susceptible Clostridium sp. Pen Aug Clinda MTZ TZP Clostridium bifermentans 0.25 4 0.016 0.125 1 Clostridium bifermentans 0.25 1 0.032 0.125 2 Clostridium perfringens 0.032 <0.016 0.023 0.5 <0.016 Clostridium perfringens 0.064 0.016 0.064 0.5 0.016 Clostridium septicum 0.125 1 0.125 32 0.064 Clostridium tertium 1 0.5 1 1 16 • Clostridium sp. susceptible to beta-lactams, clindamycin and metronidazole • Clostridium tertium potentially resistance to beta-lactam • Clostridium septicum intermediate metronidazole resistance Bacteroides fragilis Nitrocefin Pen Aug Clinda MTZ TZP Positive >32 0.75 0.38 0.19 0.125 Positive >32 2 0.25 0.25 0.25 Positive >32 0.125 1 0.064 0.064 Positive 16 0.25 2 0.25 0.125 Positive >32 0.25 2 0.25 0.5 Positive >32 2 1 0.5 0.25 Positive >32 1 1 0.5 0.5 Positive >32 16 1 1 32 Positive >32 2 1 0.5 1 Positive >32 0.25 0.125 0.5 0.25 • Positive for Beta lactamase -> Penicillin Resistant • 1 Isolate Resistant Augmentin and potentially Piptaz • Susceptible to Augmentin,Clindamycin and Metrondaizole Bacteroides Sp. Susceptibility Pen Aug Clinda MTZ TZP Bacteroides distasonis >32 16 2 0.5 >256 Bacteroides distasonis >32 4 2 0.125 16 Bacteroides distasonis >32 2 0.125 0.5 8 Bacteroides thetaiotamicron >32 4 >256 0.25 16 Bacteroides thetaiotamicron >32 0.5 2 0.5 16 Bacteroides thetaiotamicron >32 2 <0.016 0.5 16 Bacteroides vulgatus 8 0.5 1 0.25 4 • All isolates penicillin resistant • 1 B.distasonis isolate resistant to beta lactam with Beta- lactamase inhibitor • 1 B.thetaiotamicron isolate resistant to clindamycin • Potentially higher rates of Piperacillin tazobactam resistance Conclusion • Greater focus should be on Anaerobic AST should be performed for following indications • Sterile site infection • Anaerobic organism known to have variable or highly resistant patterns • In patient who failure treatment or require long term therapy • When drug selection critical in management of the patient • Alternatively periodic laboratory surveillance should be considered Questions? References • Brook, I., Wexler, H., & Goldstein, E. (2013). Antianaerobic Antimicrobials: Spectrum and Susceptibility Testing. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 526-546. • Chen, S., Gottlieb, T., Palmer, J., Morris, G., & Gilbert, G. (n.d.). Antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in Australia. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy J Antimicrob Chemother, 811-820. • Goldstein, E., Citron, D., Goldman, P., & Goldman, R. (n.d.). National hospital survey of anaerobic culture and susceptibility methods: III. Anaerobe, 68-72. • Nagy, E.,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biofire Blood Culture Identification System (BCID) Fact Sheet
    BioFire Blood Culture Identification System (BCID) Fact Sheet What is BioFire BioFire BCID is a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test designed to BCID? identify 24 different microorganism targets and three antibiotic resistance genes from positive blood culture bottles. What is the purpose The purpose of BCID is to rapidly identify common microorganisms and of BCID? antibiotic resistance genes from positive blood cultures so that antimicrobial therapy can be quickly optimized by the physician and the antibiotic stewardship pharmacist. It is anticipated that this will result in improved patient outcomes, decreased length of stay, improved antibiotic stewardship, and decreased costs. When will BCID be BCID is performed on all initially positive blood cultures after the gram stain is routinely performed and reported. performed? When will BCID not For blood cultures on the same patient that subsequently become positive with be routinely a microorganism showing the same morphology as the initial positive blood performed? culture, BCID will not be performed. BCID will not be performed on positive blood cultures with gram positive bacilli unless Listeria is suspected. BCID will not be performed on blood culture bottles > 8 hours after becoming positive. BCID will not be performed between 10PM-7AM on weekdays and 2PM-7AM on weekends. BCID will not be performed for clinics that have specifically opted out of testing. How soon will BCID After the blood culture becomes positive and the gram stain is performed and results be available? reported, the bottle will be sent to the core Microbiology lab by routine courier. BCID testing will then be performed. It is anticipated that total turnaround time will generally be 2-3 hours after the gram stain is reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 3. Distribution of Tetracycline Resistance Genes Among Gram-Positive Bacteria, Mycobacterium, Mycoplasma, Nocardia, Streptomyces and Ureaplasma Modified Sept
    Table 3. Distribution of tetracycline resistance genes among Gram-positive bacteria, Mycobacterium, Mycoplasma, Nocardia, Streptomyces and Ureaplasma Modified Sept. 27, 2021 [n=58 genera] Originally modified from MMBR 2001; 65:232-260 with permission from ASM Journals One Determinant Two Determinants Three or More Determinants n=27 n=7 n=22 k Abiotrophia tet(M) Arthrobacter tet(33)(M) Actinomyces tet(L)(M)(W) Afipia tet(M) Gardnerella tet(M)(Q) Aerococcus tet(M)(O)(58)(61) o Amycolatopsis tet(M) Gemella tet(M)(O) Bacillus tet(K)(L)(M)(O)ao(T)ao(W)(39)m(42)I (45)atotr(A)L Anaerococcus tet(M)g Granulicatella tet(M)(O) Bifidobacterium a, w tet(L)(M)(O)(W) Bacterionema tet(M) Lactococcus tet(M)(S) Bhargavaea tet(L)ac(M)(45)aa ar Brachybacterium tet(M)k Mobiluncusa tet(O)(Q) Clostridiuma,f tet(K)(L)(M)(O)(P)(Q)(W)(36)(40)j(44)p(X) Catenibacteriuma tet(M) Savagea tet(L)(M) Clostridioidesat tet(L)(P)(W)(40) Cellulosimicrobium tet(39)m Corynebacterium tet(M)(Z)(33)(W)q (39)ak Cottaibacterium tet(M) Enterococcus tet(K)(L)(M)(O)(S)(T)(U)(58)ad(61)aq Cutibacterium tet(W)aq Eubacteriuma tet(K)(M)(O)(Q)(32) Erysipelothrix tet(M) Lactobacillusf tet(K)(L)(M)(O)(Q)(S)(W)(Z)(36)am Finegoldia tet(M)g Listeria tet(K)(L)(M)(S)AB(46)ag Geobacillus tet(L) Microbacterium tet(M)(O)ae(42)I Helcococcus tet(M)ah Mycobacteriumc tet(K)(L)(M)(O)t(V)arotr(A)(B) Leifsonia tet(O)t Nocardia tet(K)(L)(M)ai (O) ai Lysinibacillus tet(39)m Paenibacillus tet(L)(M)(O)t(42)i Micrococcus tet(42) Peptostreptococcusa tet(K)(L)(M)(O)(Q) Mycoplasmab tet(M) Sporosarcina tet(K)(L)ac(M)n
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic
    antibiotics Review Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic Bacteria: Rubik’s Cube of Clinical Microbiology? Márió Gajdács 1,*, Gabriella Spengler 1 and Edit Urbán 2 1 Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary; [email protected] 2 Institute of Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, 6725 Szeged, Hungary; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +36-62-342-843 Academic Editor: Leonard Amaral Received: 28 September 2017; Accepted: 3 November 2017; Published: 7 November 2017 Abstract: Anaerobic bacteria have pivotal roles in the microbiota of humans and they are significant infectious agents involved in many pathological processes, both in immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals. Their isolation, cultivation and correct identification differs significantly from the workup of aerobic species, although the use of new technologies (e.g., matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, whole genome sequencing) changed anaerobic diagnostics dramatically. In the past, antimicrobial susceptibility of these microorganisms showed predictable patterns and empirical therapy could be safely administered but recently a steady and clear increase in the resistance for several important drugs (β-lactams, clindamycin) has been observed worldwide. For this reason, antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic isolates for surveillance
    [Show full text]
  • (BCID) Results Are “Not Detected”
    Interpretation of Positive Blood Cultures When PCR Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Results are “Not Detected” Nebraska Medicine currently uses a multi-plex PCR-based blood culture identification (BCID) system that is able to identify 19 potential pathogens growing in blood culture. BCID generally detects over 90% of the most common causative agents in bloodstream infections; however, when microbes not included on the panel are present in a blood culture, it returns a result of “Not Detected.” This document aims to provide guidance in these scenarios supported by data collected at Nebraska Medicine from January 2018 to August 2019. Table 1: Recommendations for treatment of patients with blood cultures growing organisms not detected on BCID Gram Stain/Preliminary Likely Organism (% total BCID negative)* Recommended Treatment Culture Result Gram-positive: Aerobe Micrococcus sp. (18.1%) (most can also grow in Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (9.3%) None anaerobic bottles) Diphtheroids (7%) None Peptostreptococcus sp. (4.4%) If therapy is desired: Anaerobe bottle only Lactobacillus sp. (2.6%) Metronidazole 500 mg PO q8h Clostridium sp. (2.6%) OR Penicillin G 4 million units IV q4h Gram-negative: Aerobe Acinetobacter sp. (1.8%) (most can also grow in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (1.6%) Levofloxacin 750 mg IV/PO q24h anaerobic bottles) Pseudomonas fluorescens-putida group (1%) Bacteroides fragilis group (9.3%) Anaerobe bottle only Metronidazole 500 mg IV/PO q8h Fusobacterium sp. (4.7%) *A full list of isolated organisms can be found below in Table 2 Orange text = Cocci, Blue text = Bacilli (rods) Gram-Positives When BCID results as “Not Detected” but there is microbial growth, the organism is most frequently gram-positive (71%).
    [Show full text]
  • Extraintestinal Clostridioides Difficile Infections
    antibiotics Article Extraintestinal Clostridioides difficile Infections: Epidemiology in a University Hospital in Hungary and Review of the Literature Edit Urbán 1,*, Gabriella Terhes 2 and Márió Gajdács 3 1 Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Dóm tér 10., 6720 Szeged, Hungary 2 Institute of Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Semmelweis utca 6., 6725 Szeged, Hungary; [email protected] 3 Department of Pharmacodynamics and Biopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Eötvös utca 6., 6720 Szeged, Hungary; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +36-62-342-861 Received: 8 December 2019; Accepted: 31 December 2019; Published: 2 January 2020 Abstract: Extraintestinal manifestations of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) are very uncommon, and according to the literature, poor outcomes and a high mortality have been observed among affected individuals. The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence rate of extraintestinal infections caused by C. difficile (ECD) in a tertiary-care university hospital in Hungary. During a 10-year study period, the microbiology laboratory isolated 4129 individual strains of C. difficile; among these, the majority were either from diarrheal fecal samples or from colonic material and only n = 24 (0.58%) were from extraintestinal sources. The 24 extraintestinal C. difficile isolates were recovered from 22 patients (female-to-male ratio: 1, average age: 55.4 years). The isolates in n = 8 patients were obtained from abdominal infections, e.g., appendicitis, rectal abscess or Crohn’s disease. These extraintestinal cases occurred without concomitant diarrhea. In all, but two cases C.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of Necrotizing Fasciitis Caused by Finegoldia Magna in a Patient with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Le Infezioni in Medicina, n. 4, 359-363, 2018 CASE REPORTS 359 A case of necrotizing fasciitis caused by Finegoldia magna in a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus Margherita Scapaticci1, Sabina Marchetto2, Andrea Nardi2, Maira Zoppelletto3, Andrea Bartolini3 1Laboratory Medicine Department, San Camillo Hospital, Treviso, Italy; 2Diabetic Foot Surgery Department, San Camillo Hospital, Treviso, Italy; 3Laboratory Medicine, San Bassiano Hospital, AULSS 7 Pedemontana, Bassano del Grappa, Italy SUMMARY Diabetes mellitus is one of the serious conditions the appropriate antibacterial agents. Hence the key associated with necrotizing fasciitis, a severe bac- to successful management is an early and accurate terial skin infection that spreads quickly and is diagnosis. We report a case of necrotizing fasciitis characterized by extensive necrosis of the deep and caused by Finegoldia magna in a patient with type 2 superficial fascia resulting in devascularization diabetes mellitus. and necrosis of the associated tissues. In addition to debridement and aggressive surgery procedures, Keywords: necrotizing fasciitis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, the effectiveness of therapy depends on choosing diabetic foot ulcers, anaerobes, GPACs. n INTRODUCTION lesion caused by a trauma, frequently trivial [4]. Symptoms include red or purple skin in the affect- iabetic foot ulcers are one of the main caus- ed area, severe pain, fever, and vomiting [5]. The Des of hospitalization and the major cause of major causative organisms include Streptococcus morbidity in individuals suffering from diabetes pyogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, anaerobic bacteria and, if not properly treated, can need amputation. and intestinal flora [4,6]. Diabetic patients may be The effectiveness of therapy depends on choos- predisposed to necrotizing fasciitis by the tissue hy- ing the appropriate antibacterial agents, and for poxia caused by arteriosclerosis and the immuno- this reason the key to a successful management is deficiency associated with poor glycemic control.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinically Relevant Gram- Positive Anaerobic Cocci (GPAC), New Names and Their Antibiotic Susceptibility
    Clinically relevant Gram- positive anaerobic cocci (GPAC), new names and their antibiotic susceptibility © by author ESCMID Online Lecture Library Linda Veloo Contents Introduction Gram-positive anaerobic cocci Peptostreptococcus sp. (formerly) New species and taxonomy Identification : - Phenotypic - Vitek ANC© bycard author - Fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) - MALDI-TOF MS ESCMID Online Lecture Library Antibiotic resistance Virulence F. magna Introduction Gram-positive anaerobic cocci (GPAC): Peptococcus P.niger Seldomly isolated from clinical material Ruminococcus Faecel microbiota Seldomly ©isolated by fromauthor clinical material Insufficient culture methods? ESCMIDCoprococcus Online Lecture Library Isolated from faecal samples Gram positive anaerobic cocci, D.A. Murdoch Clinical Microbiology reviews, 1998 Introduction Atopobium Faecal microbiota and clinical material Sarcina Soil, abdominal samples, faecal samples from vegetarians and patients with gastro-intestinal abnormalities Unique cell© morphology: by author Groups of 8 cells which might produce spores ESCMID Online Lecture Library Peptostreptococcus The genus Peptostreptococcus contained 13 species. Clinically most relevant (literature): P. anaerobius P. asaccharolyticus P. magnus P. micros © by author ESCMID Online Lecture Library New species, changed taxonomy (in chronological order) In 1997 3 new species were added to the genus Peptostreptococcus P. harei P. ivorii P. octavius Clinical relevance unknown© by author ESCMID Online Lecture Library Description of Three New Species of the Genus Peptostreptococcus from Human Clinical Specimens: P. harei sp. nov., P. ivorii sp. nov., and P. octavius sp. nov., D. A. Murdoch et al., Int. J. Syst. Bact. 1997 New taxonomy Reclassification of Peptostreptococcus magnus (Prevot 1933) Holdeman and Moore 1972 as Finegoldia magna comb. nov. and Peptostreptococcus micros (Prevot 1933) Smith 1957 as Micromonas micros comb.
    [Show full text]
  • Streptococcus Agalactiae, Arcanobacterium Haemolyticum과 Finegoldia Magna에 의한 괴사성 근막염 1예
    대한진단검사의학회지 제 28권제3호 2008 � 증례∙임상미생물학 � Korean J Lab Med 2008;28:191-5 DOI 10.3343/kjlm.2008.28.3.191 개에게 물린 당뇨환자의 Streptococcus agalactiae, Arcanobacterium haemolyticum과 Finegoldia magna에 의한 괴사성 근막염 1예 이성실1∙노경호2∙김창기1∙용동은1,3∙최준용 4∙이진우∙이경원1,3∙정윤섭1 연세대학교 의과대학 진단검사의학교실 세균내성연구소1, BK21 의과학사업단 3, 내과학교실4, 정형외과학교실5, 고려대학교 의과대학 진단검사의학교실2 A Case of Necrotizing Fasciitis Due to Streptococcus agalactiae, Arcanobacterium haemolyticum, and Finegoldia magna in a Dog-bitten Patient with Diabetes Sungsil Lee, M.D.1, Kyoung Ho Roh, M.D.2, Chang Ki Kim, M.D.1, Dongeun Yong, M.D.1,3, Jun Yong Choi, M.D.4, Jin Woo Lee, M.D.5, Kyungwon Lee, M.D.1,3, and Yunsop Chong, Ph.D.1 Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Research Institute of Bacterial Resistance1; BK21 Project for Medical Sciences3, Internal Medicine4, and Orthopedic Surgery5, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul; Department of Laboratory Medicine2, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea We report a case of necrotizing fasciitis involving Streptococcus agalactiae, Arcanobacterium haemolyticum, and Finegoldia magna in a 36-yr-old female diabetic patient, which started after a minor dog bite to the toe of the patient. This case suggested that a trivial infection after a minor dog bite in an immunocompromised patient such as diabetes patient could result in a significant compli- cation such as necrotizing fasciitis. The life-threatening infection was cured by timely above-the-knee amputation, as well as penicillin G and clindamycin therapy. (Korean J Lab Med 2008;28:191-5) Key Words : Necrotizing fasciitis, Streptococcus agalactiae, Arcanobacterium haemolyticum, Finegoldia magna, Diabetic patient INTRODUCTION tions[1-3].
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Diagnostics of Orthopedic Implant-Associated Infections Using
    Aamot et al. BMC Res Notes (2019) 12:725 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4755-5 BMC Research Notes RESEARCH NOTE Open Access Rapid diagnostics of orthopedic implant-associated infections using Unyvero ITI implant and tissue infection application is not optimal for Staphylococcus species identifcation Hege Vangstein Aamot1,2* , Bjørn Odd Johnsen1,4 and Inge Skråmm3 Abstract Objectives: This pilot study aimed to compare the commercial Unyvero ITI multiplex PCR application (U-ITI, Curetis GmbH) with conventional culturing concerning (a) detection of pathogens, (b) time to detection of pathogens and (c) time to and quality of antibiotic treatment recommendation in diagnostics of orthopedic implant-associated infec- tions (OIAI). Results: 72 tissue biopsies from 15 consecutive patients with deep OIAI infections were analyzed with conventional culturing including phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility testing and the U-ITI. U-ITI showed lower sensitivity than conventional culturing concerning detection of pathogens (73% vs 93%). 4/15 patients would have been given false negative results by U-ITI, all of which were culture-positive for Staphylococcus species. Median time to detection of pathogens was 47 h and antibiotic resistance 89 h by conventional methods compared to 13.5 h with the U-ITI. The U-ITI did not detect antibiotic resistance, whereas conventional culturing showed resistance to antibiotics covered by the U-ITI panel in 2 patients. Time to detection of pathogens was improved, but the detection limit for staphylococci was unsatisfactory. Although the time to antibiotic treatment recommendation was signifcantly reduced, the U-ITI would have resulted in incorrect antibiotic recommendation in 2 patients.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Gram-Positive Anaerobic Cocci
    University of Groningen Gram-positive anaerobic cocci Veloo, Alida Catharina Maria IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2011 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Veloo, A. C. M. (2011). Gram-positive anaerobic cocci: identification and clinical relevance. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 28-09-2021 Chapter 8 Finegoldia magna A.C.M. Veloo Molecular detection of human bacterial pathogens Chapter 36, CRC Press, 1st edition, Dongyou Liu RCPA Biosecurity QAP, New South Wales, Australia Chapter 8 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Resistance of Anaerobic Bacteria Can We Find Any Clinical Impact
    Resistance of anaerobic bacteria Can we find any clinical impact ? Szeged ESCMID School 2005 L. Dubreuil Faculté de Pharmacie Université de Lille II, France Antibiotic resistance among anaerobes Intrinsic resistance all anaerobes aminoglycosides, quinolones, fosfomycin,trimethoprim,aztreonam species -dependant : metronidazole : Propionibacterium & Actinomyces rifampicin : F. necrophorum, F. mortiferum cephalosporins : C. difficile cefotetan & vancomycin : C. innocuum Bacteroides fragilis group : C1G, aminopenicillins Fusobacterium : macrolides Acquired resistance Antibiotic resistance among anaerobes Acquired resistance : ß-lactams : ß -lactamase Clostridia (butyricum, + RIC group) Prevotella, Fusobacterium B. fragilis gene + promotor cfiA carbapenemase, cfxA Hyperproduction of the chromosomal enzyme lack of porin & PBP modifications Antibiotic resistance among anaerobes Acquired resistance : MLSb erm genes clindamycin Metronidazole nim genes Fluroquinolones gyrase, topoisomerase mutations resistance to Moxifloxacin Chloramphenicol cat genes The situation in Europe Gram positive cocci susceptible penicillins > cephalosporins glycopeptides, linezolid, rifampicin acquired resistance clindamycin > 20% metronidazole < 5% variable fluoroquinolones The situation in Europe Actinomyces susceptible penicillins > cephalosporins glycopeptides, linezolid, rifampicin acquired resistance tetracycline macrolides (rare) variable fluoroquinolones The situation in Europe Propionibacterium susceptible penicillins > cephalosporins fluoroquinolones glycopeptides,
    [Show full text]
  • Ceftobiprole-A Novel Cephalosporin to Combat MRSA
    Eastern Journal of Medicine 16 (2011) 1-8 M. W. Rizvi et al / Ceftobiprole- A novel cephalosporin Review Article Ceftobiprole-A novel cephalosporin to combat MRSA Mehnaz Waris Rizvi, Fatima Shujatullah*, Abida Malik, Haris M. Khan Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh, India Abstract. Gram positive cocci are responsible for a large number of infections, involving the skin and skin structures, respiratory tract, bloodstream etc., both in the community as well as in the hospital settings. However, the recent emergence of multidrug resistant strains has compromised therapeutic options as well as made therapy less effective and costlier. As medicine continues to evolve to combat these pathogens, they always seem to be a step ahead of us. Vancomycin, the drug of choice for resistant strains of gram positive cocci, has also seen the development of bacteria resistant to it. The introduction of ceftobiprole, a novel fifth-generation cephalosporin, has brought with it new hope for combating these pathogens. It exerts its antibacterial effect by binding to the PBP (penicillin-binding protein), blocking formation of the bacterial cell wall and ultimately leading to cell lysis and death. It has also got a wide antibacterial spectrum covering many gram negative bacteria as well as anaerobes. Ceftobiprole has been evaluated in various clinical trials including the multicentric STRAUSS 1 and 2 trials, and the results have demonstrated favourable efficacy of ceftobiprole against gram positive cocci. Thus, although ceftobiprole provides us with another option in our battle against the microbes, its judicious use is imperative so that we do not run out of therapeutic options in the near future.
    [Show full text]