DOCSLIB.ORG

California 15-Minute Maps 3700S VAR U5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
California 15-Minute Maps 3700S VAR U5 California 15-Minute Maps 3700s VAR U5 15’ Last updated 20070117 NOTE: For California quads in Los Angeles or Santa Barbara County we will keep up to 3 copies in REFERENCE and 3 copies in REGULAR. These counties are shown by LA or SB next to quad name. As of 7/05 imprint date will be shown as a reprint date in the call number and on inventory. Maps received before this date may not show imprint date in call number or inventory. For all other California counties we will keep up to 2 copies in REGULAR and 2 copies in REFERENCE. It is not necessary to pull existing copies that exceed these prescribed limits at this time. -- = needs 1 copy replaced -- = needs 2 copies replaced -- = needs 3 copies replaced (PO) = Planimetric Overlay Acolita 1953, Alamorio 1940, 0, 1 Rep 1980 0, 1 Rep 1955 1, 1 Alamorio 1945, 2, 2 Alvord Mountain 1978, 0, 0 Rep 1963 2, 1 Albion 1943, 2, 2 Anada 1931, 0, 1 Acton 1897, 0, 0 - L.A. Alderpoint 1949, Anaheim 1894, 0, 0 – L.A. Acton 1940, 0, 0 – L.A. Rep 1955 1, 2 Anaheim 1900, 0, 0 – L.A. 1955 0, 1 – L.A. Rep 1973 1, 2 Anaheim 1901, 1, 1 – L.A. Acton 1959, 0, 0 – L.A. Alleghany 1950, Rep 1906 0, 1 – L.A. Rep 1966 3, 3 – L.A. Rep 1966 2, 2 Rep 1922, 2, 2 – L.A. Rep 1977 0, 1 – L.A. Rep 1972 1, 1 Rep 1932, 3, 3 – L.A. Adelaida 1918, 0, 0 Rep 1980 0, 1 Rep 1944 2, 3 – L.A. Adelaida 1919, 1, 2 Almanor 1955, Anaheim 1939, 0, 0 – L.A. Adelaida 1932 Rep 1957 0, 1 Anaheim 1942, 3, 3 – L.A. Rep 1942 2, 2 Rep 1960 2, 1 Rep 1964 1, 2 – L.A. Adelaida 1937, 0, 1 Rep 1968 1, 2 Anaheim 1979, 0, 0 – L.A. Adelaida 1942, 1, 2 Rep 1978 1, 1 Anderson 1947, Adelaida 1947, Alpine Butte 1930, 0, 0 – L.A. Rep 1963 1, 1 Rep 1957 2, 2 Alpine Butte 1945 3, 3 – L.A. Rep 1967 2, 2 Rep 1960 1, 1 Altamont 1905, 0, 0 Anderson 1948, 2, 2 Adelaida 1948, 0, 0 Altamont 1937, 0, 0 Annapolis 1944, 0 Adelaida 1961, Altamont 1942, Ano Nuevo 1940, 0, 0 Rep 1968 2, 2 Rep 1964 5, 2 Ano Nuevo 1943, 2, 2 Adin 1962, Alturas 1961, Ano Nuevo 1948, 0, 1 Rep 1964 2, 2 Rep 1963 0, 1 Rep 1964 1, 2 Rep 1971 1, 2 Rep 1967 2, 2 Rep 1964 1, 1 Agua Dulce 1942, 0, 1 Rep 1984 0, 1 Antelope Mtn. 1956, Agua Dulce 1944, 1, 2 Alvord Mountain 1948, Rep 1958 0, 1 Agua Dulce 1947 Rep 1956 2, 2 Rep 1963 2, 2 Rep 1952 0, 1 Rep 1973 2, 2 Rep 1976 1, 2 Anthony Peak 1952, Auburn 1954, Bangor 1944, 2, 2 Rep 1954 0, 1 Rep 1959 0, 1 Banning 1942, 0, 0 Rep 1961 1, 1 Rep 1965 2, 2 Rep 1952 0, 1 Rep 1967 2, 2 Aurora (NV) 1956, Banning 1943, 3, 2 Antioch 1907, 0, 0 Rep 1957 1, 2 Banning 1952 1, 2 Antioch 1908, 2, 2 Rep 1961 2, 1 Banning 1953, 0, 0 Apple Valley 1957, 0, 1 Rep 1969 2, 2 Banning 1956, Rep 1960 3, 3 Avawatz Pass 1948, Rep 1961 0, 1 Rep 1968 2, 2 Rep 1963 1, 1 Rep 1964 3, 2 Arrowhead 1941, 0, 1 Rep 1969 2, 2 Banning 1978, 0, 0 Arroyo Grande 1897, 2, 2 Avawatz Pass 1951 1, 1 Bannock 1943 1, 2 Rep 1903 0, 1 Avawatz Pass 1976, 0, 0 Bannock 1956, Arroyo Grande 1939, 0, 0 Avenal (see Canoas Creek) Rep 1961 2, 2 Arroyo Grande 1942, 2, 2 Azusa 1939, 0, 0 – L.A. Barrel Spring 1939, 0, 0 Rep 1948 2, 2 Bagdad 1954 , 0, 0 Barrel Spring 1943, 2, 2 Arroyo Grande 1952, Bagdad 1956, Barrel Spring 1947, Rep 1953 0, 1 Rep 1958 0, 1 Rep 1952 0, 1 Rep 1964 3, 2 Rep 1961 2, 2 Barstow 1956, Arroyo Grande 1980, 0, 0 Baker 1956, Rep 1966 2, 2 Rep 1957 1, 2 Bartle 1939, Rep 1963 1, 2 Rep 1947 0, 0 Rep 1974 2, 2 Bartle 1961, Ashland 1954 Bakersfield 1904, 0, 0 Rep 1963 1, 2 Rep 1956 0, 1 Rep 1968 2, 2 Rep 1960 0, 1 Bartlett Springs 1942, Rep 1971 1, 1 Rep 1956 1, 1 Ash Meadows (NV) 1952, Bakersfield 1906, 0, 1 Bartlett Springs 1944, 2, 2 Rep 1953 0, 1 Rep 1915 1, 2 Bass Lake 1953, Rep 1963 2, 2 Rep 1936 0, 1 Rep 1966 2, 2 Rep 1971 1, 1 Rep 1947 1, 1 Rep 1973 1, 2 Athlone 1942, 2, 2 Bakersfield West 1930, 0, 0 Bellota 1908, 0, 0 Atwater 1961, Bakersfield West 1937, 0, 0 Bellota 1939, Rep 1963 3, 2 Bakersfield West 1943, 2, 2 Rep 1961 2, 2 Auburn 1944, 2, 2 Bangor 1941, Bellota 1942, 1, 1 Rep 1948 1, 1 Rep 1958 3, 2 Ben Lomond 1943 1, 1 Ben Lomond 1948 Rep 1959 0, 1 Rep 1953 1, 2 Rep 1962 1, 1 Rep 1955 2, 2 Rep 1967 2, 2 Rep 1966 1, 2 Big Pine 1950, Blairsden 1956, Bennetts Well 1952, Rep 1952 1, 1 Rep 1957 0, 1 Rep 1961 1, 1 Big Pine 1958 1, 1 Rep 1962 2, 1 Rep 1968 2, 2 Rep 1965 1, 2 Rep 1970 1, 1 Benton (NV) 1962, Rep 1969 2, 2 Blanco Mountain 1951, Rep 1964 3, 1 Rep 1978 1, 2 Rep 1958 0, 1 Rep 1969 1, 1 Big Pine Mountain 1943 0, 0 Rep 1963 2, 2 Bieber 1961, Big Pine Mountain 1944 0, 0 Rep 1973 2, 2 Rep 1963 1, 2 Big Sage Reservoir 1962, Blocksburg 1920 1, 1 Rep 1967 2, 2 Rep 1964 2, 2 Blocksburg 1949, Big Bar and Vicinity 1915 Rep 1972 1, 2 Rep 1955 1, 2 Rep 1948 1, 1 Big Trees 1901, 0, 0 Rep 1970 2, 2 Big Bend 1961, Bishop 1949, Blocksburg 1951, 0, 1 Rep 1961 0, 1 Rep 1963 3, 2 Blue Lake 1942, 0, 0 Rep 1963 0, 1 Rep 1969 2, 2 Blue Lake 1945, 0, 1 Rep 1966 2, 2 Bishop 1951, 0, 1 Blue Lake 1948, 1, 2 Big Bend Mtn. 1948, Bishop 1951, 0, 0 Blue Lake 1951, Rep 1953 0, 1 Blackcap Mtn. 1953, Rep 1953 0, 1 Rep 1965 2, 2 Rep 1955 1, 1 Rep 1955 1, 2 Rep 1980 1, 2 Blackcap Mtn. 1962, Rep 1972 1, 2 Big Dune (NV) 1952, Rep 1965 2, 2 Blue Mountain 1956, Rep 1953 0, 1 Rep 1972 1, 1 Rep 1959 0, 1 Rep 1961 2, 1 Rep 1978 1, 1 Rep 1963 1, 1 Big Dune 1967, 0, 0 Black Peak (AZ) 1959, Rep 1970 1, 2 Rep 1968 2, 2 Rep 1961 0, 1 Bodie 1958, Big Maria Mountains 1940 , 0, 0 Rep 1965 2, 2 Rep 1959 0, 1 Big Maria Mountains 1943, 0, 0 Black Rock Mtn. 1954, Rep 1964 1, 2 Big Maria Mountains 1945 2, 2 Rep 1963 2, 1 Rep 1968 2, 2 Big Maria Mountains, 1951, Rep 1973 1, 2 Bollibokka Mtn. 1943, 0, 0 Rep 1955 3, 2 Blairsden 1937, 0, 0 Bollibokka Mtn. 1949, 2, 2 Blairsden 1943, 1, 2 Bollibokka Mtn. 1957, Big Meadow 1956, Rep 1948 2, 2 Rep 1959 0, 1 Rep 1967 2, 2 Rep 1969 2, 2 Bristol Lake 1956, Bonanza King 1955, Bradley 1976, 0, 0 Rep 1958 0, 1 Rep 1957 0, 1 Branch Mountain 1919, 0, 0 Rep 1960 2, 2 Rep 1960 1, 2 Branch Mountain 1937, 0, 0 Broadwell Lake 1955 Bonanza King 1969, Branch Mountain 1942, 2, 2 Rep 1956 0, 1 Rep 1971 0, 1 Rep 1951 1, 2 Rep 1961 2, 2 Rep 1980 1, 1 Branch Mountain 1952, Rep 1977 1, 1 Boonville 1959, Rep 1953 2, 2 Bryson 1917, 0, 0 Rep 1961 1, 2 Rep 1964 2, 3 Bryson 1919, 2, 2 Rep 1965 2, 2 Branscomb 1921, 1, 2 Bryson 1929 Boron 1932, 0, 0 Rep 1942 2, 2 Boron 1954, Branscomb 1951, Bryson 1942, 1, 1 Rep 1955 0, 1 Rep 1953 1, 1 Rep 1959 3, 2 Rep 1963 1, 1 Rep 1971 1, 2 Rep 1968 2, 2 Bryson 1948, Boron 1980, 0, 0 Brawley 1940, 0, 0 Rep 1957 2, 2 Borrego 1939, 0, 0 Brawley 1945, 2, 2 Rep 1963 2, 1 Borrego 1943, 2, 2 Brawley 1957, Bryson 1949, 0, 0 Borrego 1952, 0, 1 Rep 1961 3, 2 Bryson 1961, Borrego 1959, Bray 1950, Rep 1968 3, 2 Rep 1961 1, 1 Rep 1952 0, 1 Bryson 1979, 0, 0 Rep 1966 3, 2 Rep 1963 (shaded) 4, 1 Bucks Lake 1950, Borrego Mtn. 1960, Rep 1963 2, 2 Rep 1953 0, 1 Rep 1961 2, 2 Bray 1965, Rep 1964 2, 2 Rep 1966 1, 2 Rep 1966 1, 1 Bullfrog (NV) 1954, Bouquet Reservoir 1958, Rep 1969 1, 2 Rep 1955 1, 1 Rep 1960 1, 2 – L.A. Rep 1980 1, 2 Rep 1963 1, 2 Rep 1968 3, 3 – L.A Breckenridge Mountain 1943, 2, 2 Rep 1972 2, 2 Bradley 1917, 0, 0 Rep 1963 3, 2 Burney 1957, Bradley 1919, 1, 2 Briceland 1921, 2, 2 Rep 1959 0, 1 Bradley 1942, 2, 2 Bridgeport 1911, 0, 0 Rep 1964 3, 2 Bradley 1948, Bridgeport 1958, Butte City 1954, Rep 1957 2, 2 Rep 1960 1, 1 Rep 1959 2, 2 Rep 1963 1, 1 Rep 1965 2, 2 Rep 1967 2, 2 Bradley 1961, Rep 1973 1, 2 Butte Meadows 1958, Rep 1960 1, 2 Calabasas 1903, 1, 1 - L.A.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Petition to List Mountain Lion As Threatened Or Endangered Species
    BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME COMMISSION A Petition to List the Southern California/Central Coast Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) of Mountain Lions as Threatened under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) A Mountain Lion in the Verdugo Mountains with Glendale and Los Angeles in the background. Photo: NPS Center for Biological Diversity and the Mountain Lion Foundation June 25, 2019 Notice of Petition For action pursuant to Section 670.1, Title 14, California Code of Regulations (CCR) and Division 3, Chapter 1.5, Article 2 of the California Fish and Game Code (Sections 2070 et seq.) relating to listing and delisting endangered and threatened species of plants and animals. I. SPECIES BEING PETITIONED: Species Name: Mountain Lion (Puma concolor). Southern California/Central Coast Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) II. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Listing as Threatened or Endangered The Center for Biological Diversity and the Mountain Lion Foundation submit this petition to list mountain lions (Puma concolor) in Southern and Central California as Threatened or Endangered pursuant to the California Endangered Species Act (California Fish and Game Code §§ 2050 et seq., “CESA”). This petition demonstrates that Southern and Central California mountain lions are eligible for and warrant listing under CESA based on the factors specified in the statute and implementing regulations. Specifically, petitioners request listing as Threatened an Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) comprised of the following recognized mountain lion subpopulations:
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions
    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline Environmental
    Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline Environmental Assessment and Proposed California Desert Conservation Area Plan Amendment BLM Case File No. CACA-054096 BLM-DOI-CA-D060-2016-0017-EA BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT California Desert District 22835 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos Moreno Valley, CA 92553 April 2017 USDOI Bureau of Land Management April 2017Page 2 Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline EA and Proposed CDCA Plan Amendment United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT California Desert District 22835 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos Moreno Valley, CA 92553 April XX, 2017 Dear Reader: The U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has finalized the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed right-of-way (ROW) and associated California Desert Conservation Area Plan (CDCA) Plan Amendment (PA) for the Eagle Crest Energy Gen- Tie and Water Supply Pipeline (Proposed Action), located in eastern Riverside County, California. The Proposed Action is part of a larger project, the Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project (FERC Project), licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in 2014. The BLM is issuing a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) on the Proposed Action. The FERC Project would be located on approximately 1,150 acres of BLM-managed land and approximately 1,377 acres of private land. Of the 1,150 acres of BLM-managed land, 507 acres are in the 16-mile gen-tie line alignment; 154 acres are in the water supply pipeline alignment and other Proposed Action facilities outside the Central Project Area; and approximately 489 acres are lands within the Central Project Area of the hydropower project.
    [Show full text]
  • April 1999 SCREE
    January, 2001 Peak Climbing Section, Loma Prieta Chapter, Sierra Club Vol. 35 No. 1 World Wide Web Address: http://www.sierraclub.org/chapters/lomaprieta/pcs Next General Meeting 2001 Publicity Committee Date: Tuesday, January 9 The PCS Publicity Committee for the year 2001 is the following: Time: 7:30 PM Mailings: Paul Vlasveld Listmaster: Steve Eckert Program: Annapurna III, Southwest Buttress Webmaster: Jim Curl In October 1978 a team of people including Ann Scree Editor: Bob Bynum Reynolds made their way to Annapurna III with the I will announce the various e-mail addresses and contact objective of climbing the southwest buttress. information once I get that straightened out. Avalanche conditions on the mountain forced them to We can also use more help with the printing and mailing. If you are interested, please contact me. rethink their route and a line up the west face was chosen. Join us for a slide show by Ann Reynolds • Rick Booth, PCS PubComm Chair recounting this journey. A $2 donation is requested for the slide show. Farewell As Webmaster Location Peninsula Conservation Center 3921 Back in 1994, when the world wide web was young, Silicon East Bayshore Rd, Palo Alto, CA Graphics CEO Ed McCracken instructed all employees that the Directions: From 101: Exit at San Antonio Road, web was our future. He arranged to provide an internet server on the SGI site to be used for employees personal sites and for Go East to the first traffic light, Turn community service pages. I jumped at the opportunity, and left and follow Bayshore Rd to the without stopping to obtain permission from the Sierra Club, I PCC on the corner of Corporation created the first PCS web site on the SGI server.
    [Show full text]
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP
    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of the TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST a Compilation
    HISTORY OF THE TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST A Compilation Posting the Toiyabe National Forest Boundary, 1924 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Chronology ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Bridgeport and Carson Ranger District Centennial .................................................................... 126 Forest Histories ........................................................................................................................... 127 Toiyabe National Reserve: March 1, 1907 to Present ............................................................ 127 Toquima National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ....................................................... 128 Monitor National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ........................................................ 128 Vegas National Forest: December 12, 1907 – July 2, 1908 .................................................... 128 Mount Charleston Forest Reserve: November 5, 1906 – July 2, 1908 ................................... 128 Moapa National Forest: July 2, 1908 – 1915 .......................................................................... 128 Nevada National Forest: February 10, 1909 – August 9, 1957 .............................................. 128 Ruby Mountain Forest Reserve: March 3, 1908 – June 19, 1916 ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G1:Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment
    Appendix G1 Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Prepared for November 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 26111 Antonio Parkway Rancho Santa Margarita, CA Draft CONFIDENTIAL - NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Prepared for November 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 26111 Antonio Parkway Rancho Santa Margarita, CA Prepared By: ESA 626 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Project site location: Cadiz, Cadiz Summit, Cadiz Lake NW, Cadiz Lake NE, Calumet Mine, Chubbuck, Milligan, East of Milligan, Danby Lake, Sablon, and Arica Mountains (CA) USGS 7.5’ Topographic Maps T1S R19E, 20E; T1N R18E, 19E; T2N R17E, 18E; 3N R16E, 17E; 4N R15E, 16E; 5N R14E, 15E Principal Investigator: Monica Strauss, M.A. Report Authors: Madeleine Bray, M.A, Candace Ehringer, M.A., Brian S. Marks, Ph.D. Keywords: San Bernardino County, Cadiz, Milligan, Archer, Freda, Chubbuck, Ward, Siam, Saltmarsh, Sablon, Fishel, Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad, Parker Cutoff, General George Patton Desert Training Center, Railroad Siding, Archaeological Survey 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Orlando Palm Springs Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills 210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery,
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey and A. M. Leszcykowski and J. D. Causey U.S
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP MF-1603-A UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF THE COXCOMB MOUNTAINS WILDERNESS STUDY AREA (CDCA-328), SAN BERNARDINO AND RIVERSIDE COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA SUMMARY REPORT By J. P. Calzia, J. E. Kilburn, R. W. Simpson, Jr., and C. M. Alien U.S. Geological Survey and A. M. Leszcykowski and J. D. Causey U.S. Bureau of Mines STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines to conduct mineral surveys on certain areas to determine their mineral resource potential. Results must be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report presents the results of a mineral survey of the Coxcomb Mountains Wilderness Study Area (CDCA-328), California Desert Conservation Area, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, California. SUMMARY Geologic, geochemical, geophysical, and mineral surveys within the Coxcomb Mountains Wilderness Study Area in south­ eastern California define several areas with low to moderate potential for base and precious metals. Inferred subeconomic re­ sources of gold at the Moser mine (area Ha) are estimated at 150,000 tons averaging 1.7 ppm Au. The remainder of the study area has low potential for other mineral and energy resources including radioactive minerals and geothermal resources. Oil, gas, and coal resources are not present within the wilderness study area. INTRODUCTION Hope (1966), Greene (1968), and Calzia (1982) indicate that the wilderness study area is underlain by metaigneous and The Coxcomb Mountains Wilderness Study Area metasedimentary rocks of Jurassic and (or) older age intruded (CDCA-328) is located in the Mojave Desert of southeastern by granitic rocks of Late Jurassic to Late Cretaceous age.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog (Rana Muscosa)
    mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa) Southern California Distinct Population Segment 5-year Review: Summary and Evaluation Mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa) and habitat. Photocredit: Adam Backlin (USGS). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office Carlsbad, California July 13, 2012 2012 5-year Review for mountain yellow-legged frog 5-YEAR REVIEW mountain yellow-legged frog (Rana muscosa) Southern California Distinct Population Segment I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing of a species as endangered or threatened is based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of a species. In the 5-year review, we consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed or last reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.1.1 Introduction This Section Describes the Aesthetic and Visual
    Paraiso Springs Resort Draft Environmental Impact Report 3.1 Aesthetics and Visual Resources 3.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES 3.1.1 Introduction This section describes the aesthetic and visual resource conditions at the project site and in the project vicinity; presents the regulatory framework applicable to the proposed project; and discusses the potential aesthetic impacts that could result from implementation of the proposed project. The primary aesthetic concerns associated with the proposed project are potential changes in aesthetic character of the project site; impacts to public viewsheds; and/or obstruction of existing views. The project-specific information and analysis within this section is primarily based on project plans and site reconnaissance and photo documentation of the project site performed by RBF Consulting during the spring of 2007, and a subsequent site visit and documentation by EMC Planning Group in the fall of 2012. 3.1.2 Environmental Setting Local Visual Resources The project site consists of about 235 acres nestled in the mouth of a canyon extending westward into the foothills located at the western terminus of Paraiso Springs Road on the eastern slope of the Sierra de Salinas Foothills in the Salinas Valley, approximately seven miles west of the City of Greenfield. Elevations at the project site range from approximately 1,000 feet in the southern portion of the project site to slightly over 2,400 feet along the ridgelines. Views from the project site consist of scenic ridgelines north, west, and south, and the expansive Salinas Valley to the east. Surrounding land uses currently consist of agricultural uses and grazing, as well as several single-family residences located along Paraiso Springs Road located east of the project site.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of Surface Waters of California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTI8 SMITH, DIEECTOE WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 296 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS OF CALIFORNIA PART II. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OP JOHN C. HOYT BY B. D. WOOD In cooperation with the State Water Commission and the Conservation Commission of the State of California WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1912 NOTE. A complete list of the gaging stations maintained in the San Joaquin River basin from 1888 to July 1, 1912, is presented on pages 100-102. 2 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS IN SAN JOAQUIN RIYER BASIN, CALIFORNIA. By B. D. WOOD. INTRODUCTION. This gazetteer is the second of a series of reports on the* surf ace waters of California prepared by the United States Geological Survey under cooperative agreement with the State of California as repre­ sented by the State Conservation Commission, George C. Pardee, chairman; Francis Cuttle; and J. P. Baumgartner, and by the State Water Commission, Hiram W. Johnson, governor; Charles D. Marx, chairman; S. C. Graham; Harold T. Powers; and W. F. McClure. Louis R. Glavis is secretary of both commissions. The reports are to be published as Water-Supply Papers 295 to 300 and will bear the fol­ lowing titles: 295. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part I, Sacramento River basin. 296. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part II, San Joaquin River basin. 297. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part III, Great Basin and Pacific coast streams. 298. Water resources of California, Part I, Stream measurements in the Sacramento River basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Permits Issued July 2017 (PDF)
    BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED Permits Issued July, 2017 Permit Issued Description Scope APN Address Valuation Contractor 386692 07/18/2017 shepard manuufacture home Manufactured Home on Foundation 020-012-020-000 6600 THOUSAND OAKS DR, LINCOLN, California COUSIN GARY HOMES 523306 07/07/2017 JENNINGS GUEST HOUSE Guest House 064-020-068-000 1605 RIVER RIDGE RD, GOLD RUN, California $83,878.28 SCOTT BROWNELL ARCHITECT 525985 07/27/2017 LAKE TAHOE CLUB RESORT- Demolition 117-071-015-000 6731 N LAKE BLVD, TAHOE VISTA, California $1.00 OWNER-BUILDER DEMO 525986 07/27/2017 LAKE TAHOE CLUB RESORT- Demolition 117-071-015-000 6731 N LAKE BLVD, TAHOE VISTA, California $1.00 DEMO 527516 07/19/2017 BRATT - RENEWAL - ADDITON RENEWAL PERMIT 080-340-016-000 10970 PALISADES DR, TRUCKEE, California 529859 07/12/2017 WEAVER GUESTHOUSE GUEST HOUSE 077-081-018-000 15279 BANCROFT RD, AUBURN, California 95602 $108,332.40 OWNER-BUILDER 530172 07/19/2017 MUFF - ADDITION ADDITION >3000 069-051-006-000 2279 LAKE DR, SODA SPRINGS, California $81,515.93 WOODCRAFT CONSTRUCTION INC 532033 07/20/2017 VAIL ADDITION, DECK Residential Addition < 3000 090-163-031-000 583 BEAVER ST, California $161,660.32 MEYER CONSTRUCTION 532171 07/07/2017 GILLMORE ADDITION Residential Addition < 3000 040-271-031-000 10271 HILLVIEW RD, NEWCASTLE, California $52,754.55 OWNER-BUILDER 534191 07/24/2017 CONRIQUE FACTORY BUILT Manufactured Home on Foundation 044-012-052-000 5800 ARABIAN LN, LOOMIS, California 95650 $271,340.06 OWNER-BUILDER HOME ON FOUNDATION BLD15-00491 07/27/2017 SMITH ADDITION
    [Show full text]