Immigration and Extreme Voting: Evidence from France

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Immigration and Extreme Voting: Evidence from France FORUM FORUM Anthony Edo, Jonathan Öztunc and PREVIOUS RESEARCH districts. Adding the share of electorate aged 45 and be ascribed to a presidential candidate). If votes for all Panu Poutvaara over boosts this figure to 85.7%. Adding population different presidential candidates are aggregated, they Previous research has already linked immigration and shares of EU15, EU accession and non-EU immigrants yield the number of valid votes. Immigration and Extreme extremist voting, as well as studied the mechanisms as additional explanatory variables does not change Since we are interested in the determinants of 1 Voting: Evidence from France behind opposition towards immigration. Otto and much, as the share accounted for is then 86%. To a large votes for far-left and far-right candidates, we identify Steinhardt (2014) find that larger immigrant shares extent, this can be expected to reflect endogenous presidential candidates that were classified as either increased support for the far-right in Hamburg, using migration responses. Migrants are more likely to far-left or far-right by the media in recent presidential data on city districts with fixed-effects. Halla et al. migrate to areas that are doing well economically, and elections. Jean Marie Le Pen, Marine Le Pen, Nicolas (2017) study the case of Austria and show that increas- where people are more likely to support European Dupont-Aignan, Philippe de Villiers and Bruno Mégret ing immigrant shares lead to higher vote shares for the Union membership, and have positive attitudes are included in the set of far-right presidential candi- INTRODUCTION far-right party. Card et al. (2012) use European Social towards immigration and globalisation more generally. dates. The set of far-left candidates consists of Jean- Survey (ESS) data to study the relative importance of In the present paper, we account for this potential iden- Luc Mélenchon, Nathalie Arthaud, Olivier Besancenot, In recent decades, immigration has become one of the labour market and cultural concerns in driving opposi- tification issue – i.e. the fact that migrants may prefer Philippe Poutou, Marie-George Buffet, Robert Georges most divisive issues in many Western countries. Oppos- tion to immigration. They conclude that compositional to settle in areas where the propensity to support far- August Hue, Pierre Juquin, André Francois Lajoinie, ing immigration has been a central pillar of the plat- amenities related to the utility that natives derive from right parties is low. Pierre Boussel, George Marchais and Arlette Laguiller. forms of extremist parties in many Western countries, their neighbourhoods, schools and workplaces are an Hainmueller and Hangartner (2013) studied dis- Finally, we aggregate the number of votes for all far- in the Leave campaign against British membership in important reason for negative attitudes towards crimination against immigrants in Switzerland, where right (far-left) presidential candidates to obtain an the European Union, and in Donald Trump’s electoral immigration. some municipalities used to decide on naturalisation aggregated number of votes for far-right (far-left) par- Anthony Edo campaign. Opposition to immigration and globalisa- When it comes to the psychological determinants of immigrants by referenda on individual applicants. ties in a presidential election. In order to calculate vote CEPII. tion were also central in Marine Le Pen’s campaign in of anti-immigration attitudes, Poutvaara and Stein- They find that the country of origin is a more important shares, we divide the aggregated votes by the total the French presidential election in 2017. The Front hardt (2015) show that bitter people who feel that they determinant of being naturalised than any other appli- number of votes cast (invalid and valid votes). National’s Marine Le Pen made it to the second round have not gotten what they deserve in life worry more cant characteristic, including and won 34% of votes. This was almost twice the 18% about immigration. Their analysis uses German language skills, education, vote share that her father Jean-Marie Le Pen won in Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) data and holds both in and socioeconomic status. Figure 2 2002, the only previous presidential election in which cross sections and a panel approach, when changes in The applicants from ex-Yugo- Development of Unemployment Rate over Time Front National made it to the second round. The Front bitterness are used to explain changes in worries about slavia and Turkey are rejected National’s platform is anti-EU, anti-immigration and immigration. The link between bitterness and worries considerably more often than % anti-globalisation. about immigration holds among different skill catego- applicants with similar age, 10 Jonathan Öztunc In this article, we summarise our ongoing research ries, men and women, those living in former West and education and labour market 8 Master’s student at with Yvonne Giesing on extreme voting in France. Given former East Germany, and young and old. Furthermore, status from northern and west- Barcelona Graduate School of Economics. the central role that France plays in the European the link cannot be explained away by labour market ern Europe. 6 Union, together with Germany, understanding French competition, as it holds among civil servants who have politics is important in its own right. Furthermore, permanent contracts and are not affected by labour DATA 4 French politics is an ideal setting to test the role of market competition as a result. immigration and economic concerns in the rise of far- Nikolka and Poutvaara (2016) analysed voting in We investigate the determi- 2 left and far-right voting more generally. The Front the Brexit referendum in 326 local authority districts in nants of voting outcomes for National has run, and won more than 10% of votes in all England. They show that the share of the electorate the first round of the presiden- 0 French presidential elections since 1988. Far-left candi- with some tertiary education alone can explain 80% of tial elections that occurred in 1988 1995 2002 2007 2012 dates have also won over 10% of votes in all presiden- variation in the Leave vote share across local authority 1988, 1995, 2002, 2007, 2012 and Source: French census data; French National Institute for Statistics and tial elections since 1988, apart 2017. The data on voting out- Economic Studies (INSEE). © ifo Institute Panu Poutvaara from in 2007. Ours is the first comes are available for around ifo Institute, Ludwig- paper that separately analyses Figure 1 36,000 French municipalities. Figure 3 Maximilians-University Munich, CESifo, CReAM the effects of immigration on They record the aggregated and IZA. voting in terms of political sup- Vote Share for Far-Left and Far-Right Candidates in France number of registered voters, Development of the Immigration Share over Time port for the far-left and far-right. Far-left parties abstentions, cast votes, valid % Far-right parties % Importantly, our analysis con- 30 and invalid votes and the votes 10 trols for various economic and for each presidential candidate 25 demographic factors that could in each municipality. Regis- 8 also explain extreme voting, tered voters refer to all people 20 and accounts for the fact that who are eligible to cast a vote 6 immigrants may prefer to reside 15 at the ballot box. Registered in areas where the propensity voters are split into abstentions 4 to vote for extreme parties dif- 10 (people who refrain from vot- fers from other places. ing) and cast votes (people who 2 5 1 This article is based on the research paper fill out a ballot paper at the bal- “Immigration and Electoral Support for the Far 0 lot box). Cast votes are split into 0 Left and the Far Right” by A. Edo, Y. Giesing, J. Öztunc and P. Poutvaara, presented in the 1988 1995 2002 2007 2012 2017 invalid votes (blank and errone- 1988 1995 2002 2007 2012 OECD-CEPII conference “Immigration in OECD ous votes on the ballot paper) Countries” in Paris in December 2017, and avai- Source: Presidential election data (2017) made available by the French government. Source: French census data; French National Institute for Statistics and lable as ifo Working Paper No. 244, 2017. Dt o ote re for te er 1 come from te cetre e oe ociopolitiue © ifo Institute and valid votes (votes that can Economic Studies (INSEE). © ifo Institute 28 ifo DICE Report 4 / 2017 December Volume 15 ifo DICE Report 4 / 2017 December Volume 15 29 FORUM FORUM In order to show that our results are not sensitive DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS ON FAR-RIGHT AND far-left candidates. The increase in the vote share for for omitted variables that could affect immigration and to the geographical unit of analysis used in the empiri- FAR-LEFT VOTING these candidates was particularly concentrated in the political outcomes within an area. In particular, we cal section, we aggregate the data on votes at three north western and eastern French region (ranging include the share of unemployment in the population different regional levels: the canton, department and Figure 1 shows how the first-round vote share of far- between about three and five percentage points). and control for the age, education and employment region level. While there are around 2,000 cantons, right and far-left candidates has changed between 1988 structure of each area. there are 96 departments and 22 regions. Using larger and 2017. Both vote shares have increased dramatically EMPIRICAL METHOD: SPATIAL CORRELATION However, it is still possible that immigrants settle geographical areas allows us to show that our results since 2007, following the financial crisis, the Eurozone APPROACH in places with a small share of votes for anti-immigra- are not contaminated by the fact that French citizens crisis and, most recently, the refugee crisis. Figures 2 tion parties.
Recommended publications
  • Updating the Debate on Turkey in France, Note Franco-Turque N° 4
    NNoottee ffrraannccoo--ttuurrqquuee nn°° 44 ______________________________________________________________________ Updating the Debate on Turkey in France, on the 2009 European Elections’ Time ______________________________________________________________________ Alain Chenal January 2011 . Programme Turquie contemporaine The Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non- governmental and a non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Using an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the rare French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of the European debate. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. Contemporary Turkey Program is supporter by : ISBN : 978-2-86592-814-9 © Ifri – 2011 – All rights reserved Ifri Ifri-Bruxelles 27 rue de la Procession Rue Marie-Thérèse, 21 75740 Paris Cedex 15 – FRANCE 1000 – Brussels – BELGIUM Tel : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 Tel : +32 (0)2 238 51 10 Fax : +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 Fax : +32 (0)2 238 51 15 Email : [email protected] Email : [email protected] Website: Ifri.org Notes franco-turques The IFRI program on contemporary Turkey seeks to encourage a regular interest in Franco-Turkish issues of common interest. From this perspective, and in connection with the Turkish Season in France, the IFRI has published a series of specific articles, entitled “Notes franco-turques” (Franco-Turkish Briefings).
    [Show full text]
  • Nicolas Sarkozy – Avril 2011 28 ?
    PRESIDENTIELLE 2012 « Les rapports de force électoraux à un an du scrutin » Le Télégraphe – 26 avril 2011 L’intérêt pour l’élection présidentielle à un an du scrutin % de personnes en ayant parlé avec leurs proches Comparatif 43% 38% 41% 29% 3-4 février 2010 3-4 mars 2011 31 mars - 1er avril 2011 Avril 2006 Source: Les conversations des Français dans le tableau de bord IFOP / Paris-Match 1 La popularité des présidents de la Vème République 12 mois avant l’élection présidentielle Satisfaits Score obtenu au second Ifop/ tour de l’élection Journal du Dimanche présidentielle (%) (%) Charles de Gaulle – Décembre 1964 54 55,2 (1965) Valéry Giscard d’Estaing – Avril 1980 45 48,2 (1981) François Mitterrand – Avril1987 56 54 (1988) Jacques Chirac – Avril 2001 56 82,2 (2002) Nicolas Sarkozy – Avril 2011 28 ? 2 PRESIDENTIELLE 2012 Intentions de vote au premier tour Le Télégraphe – 26 avril 2011 Les intentions de vote au premier tour Hypothèse Dominique Strauss-Kahn, Hypothèse François Hollande, candidat socialiste candidat socialiste 1 Dominique Strauss-Kahn 27% 1 François Hollande 21% 2 Nicolas Sarkozy 20% 1 Nicolas Sarkozy 21% 3 Marine Le Pen 19% 3 Marine Le Pen 20% Hypothèse Martine Aubry, Hypothèse Ségolène Royal, candidate socialiste candidate socialiste 1 Nicolas Sarkozy 21,5% 1 Nicolas Sarkozy 21% 2 Martine Aubry 20% 2 Marine Le Pen 20% 2 Marine Le Pen 20% 3 Ségolène Royal 16% 4 Récapitulatif des intentions de vote au premier tour Hypothèses selon le candidat socialiste Dominique François Martine Ségolène Strauss-Kahn Hollande Aubry Royal
    [Show full text]
  • En Jeu En Jeu En Jeu HISTOIRE ET MÉMOIRES VIVANTES En Jeu
    En Jeu En Jeu En Jeu HISTOIRE ET MÉMOIRES VIVANTES En Jeu NOUVELLES RECHERCHES SUR LES DÉPORTATIONS ET LES CAMPS En Jeu REVUE PLURIDISCIPLINAIRE DE LA FONDATION POUR LA MÉMOIRE DE LA DÉPORTATION DIRECTEUR DE LA PUBLICATION Marie-José CHOMBART DE LAUWE, directeur de recherche honoraire (CNRS) En Jeu RÉDACTEURS EN CHEF Yves LESCURE, directeur général de la Fondation pour la mémoire de la déportation (FMD) Frédéric ROUSSEAU, professeur d'histoire contemporaine, Univ. Paul Valéry-Montpellier RÉDACTEURS EN CHEF ADJOINTS Jacques ARON, professeur honoraire d'histoire et théorie de l'architecture, essayiste sur la condition juive européenne Charles HEIMBERG, historien et didacticien de l'histoire, professeur ordinaire, Univ. de Genève Yannis THANASSEKOS, collaborateur scientifique en sociologie politique, Univ. de Liège En Jeu COMITÉ DE RÉDACTION HISTOIRE ET MÉMOIRES VIVANTES Jean-Michel ANDRÉ, médecin expert du ministère de la Défense, ancien médecin au CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière Corinne BENESTROFF, psychologue, docteur en littérature, chargée de cours, Univ. Paris 5 Laurence DE COCK, professeure agrégée, chargée de cours, Univ. Paris 7 / Lab. ECP, Univ. Lyon 2 Frédérik DETUE, maître de conférences en littérature générale et comparée, Univ. de Poitiers, Lab. FoReLL - B3 Henning FAUSER, docteur en histoire, enseignant à Sciences Po Rennes Thomas FONTAINE, historien, directeur du Musée de la Résistance nationale de Champigny-sur-Marne Bertrand HAMELIN, professeur agrégé, membre associé du CRHQ, UMR 6583 (CNRS/Univ. de Caen) En Jeu Charlotte LACOSTE, maître de conférences en langue et littérature françaises, Univ. de Lorraine, CREM-Praxitexte Sébastien LEDOUX, historien (Paris 1/Centre d'histoire sociale du XXe siècle), enseignant à Sciences Po Cyrille LE QUELLEC, documentaliste, FMD Julien MARY, docteur en histoire contemporaine, Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • Pâques À Juhègues Sant Jordi Élections Présidentielles
    Vendredi 14 avril 2017 N° 1154 QUAND LA "CARXOFA" FAIT LE BUZZZ ! L’artichaut de la Salanque est l'un des symboles du patrimoine agricole et culturel de notre commune. Cultivé sur nos terres depuis le 18ème siècle, il retrouve une place de choix sur les étals des maraîchers de toute la France après que des passionnés aient obtenu en 2015 la création d’une "indication géographique protégée" (IGP) qui lui a permis d’asseoir sa notoriété. Après quelques années difficiles, les ventes ont presque doublé en quatre ans et la production est en hausse avec cette année plusieurs semaines d’avance sur les artichauts de Bretagne. Une belle performance pour notre produit phare qui lui a valu un coup de projecteur de différents médias ces dernières semaines (L’Agri, l’Indépendant, France 3…). Félicitations à tous nos producteurs, notre mascotte Xofi est fière de vous ! LE ROND-POINT DE LA PLAGE S’OFFRE UNE OUVERTURE D'importants travaux ont débuté au niveau du rond-point de croisement des routes inter-plages et RD11E. Afin de fluidifier la circulation souvent chargée en saison dans le sens sortant de Torreilles plage et limiter la formation de bouchons sur le boulevard, une bretelle d'évitement du rond-point en direction de l'autoroute est en effet en cours de réalisation. Elle sera accompagnée de la mise à deux voies de la sortie du boulevard sur le rond-point. Les conditions de circulation des torreillans habitant la plage et des touristes devraient être significativement améliorées par ces aménagements, et ce dès cet été puisque le chantier sera achevé avant la saison estivale.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurzportraits Der Kandidaten Nathalie Arthaud, François Asselineau, Jacques Cheminade, Nicolas Dupont-Aignan, Jean Lassalle, Philippe Poutou (05
    Kurzportraits der Kandidaten Nathalie Arthaud, François Asselineau, Jacques Cheminade, Nicolas Dupont-Aignan, Jean Lassalle, Philippe Poutou (05. April 2017) Laut aktueller Umfragen werden am 23. April im ersten Wahlgang der Präsidentschaftswahlen über 90% der Wähler für François Fillon, Benoît Hamon, Marine Le Pen, Emmanuel Macron oder Jean-Luc Mélenchon stimmen. Knapp 10% möchten einen Kandidaten einer Splitterpartei oder Wahlbewegung unterstützen. Bei der am 4. April von BFM TV und CNews ausgestrahlten TV-Debatte hatten die Außenseiter erstmals Gelegenheit, sich vor einem großen Publikum ge- meinsam mit den in den Umfragen führenden Bewerbern zu präsentieren. Nathalie Arthaud (*1970), Kandidatin der Partei Lutte Ouvrière (LO), ist Lehrerin für Wirtschaft und Management und unterrichtet auch während ihres Wahlkampfs in einem Lycée nahe bei Paris. LO beruft sich auf die Ideen Leo Trotzkis und sieht die Arbeiterklasse in einer zentralen gesellschaftlichen Rolle, Nur deren Ausbeutung ermögliche Firmen und Aktionären immer größere Gewinne. Deshalb fordert Arthaud ein Kündigungsverbot und die Umverteilung der Arbeit auf alle Arbeitnehmer ohne Lohnverluste für die Beschäftigten. Zusätzlich sollen die Angestellten die Kontrolle über ihre Unternehmen bekommen, um zu gewährleisten, dass Unternehmensentscheidungen nicht gegen das Wohl der Beschäf- tigten getroffen werden. Um allen Bürgern ein würdiges Dasein zu gewährleisten, sollen Gehälter generell um 300 € bzw. Gehälter und Renten auf mindestens 1.800 € netto angehoben werden. François Asselineau
    [Show full text]
  • Virgin Entretien Avec Nadir Petroplus Djermoune, Membre De La PSA Candia Direction Nationale Du PST Arcelor Goodyearcandia D'algérie
    Dossier Deuxième congrès du NPA : rebondir Pages 6 et 7 n°181 – 7 février 2013 – 1,20 € www.npa2009.org regardS IMPOSONS L'Algérie et la guerre au Mali Arcelor Virgin Entretien avec Nadir Petroplus Djermoune, membre de la PSA Candia direction nationale du PST Arcelor GoodyearCandia d'Algérie. PetroplusVirgin Arcelor Page 2 Sano Petroplus Candia Candia Sano Virgin PSA PSA Petroplus Goodyear Sano Virgin premier plan Sano Droit de vote des ArcelorVirgin Candia Petroplus étrangers : trop de Sano racisme en France Goodyear PetroplusArcelor Page 3 Virgin Petroplus Sano Goodyear Arcelor PSA PSA Arcelor Petroplus Candia Goodyear Virgin Candia Sano Arcelor Candia PSA PSA PSA Arcelor Petroplus Sano Virgin Candia Arcelor Petroplus Goodyear international Goodyear Égypte : Morsi de VirginCandia Sano plus en plus isolé Arcelor Virgin Page 5 Candia PSAGoodyear PSA PSA Sano Arcelor actu Sano Arcelor ! Virgin Virgin PSA Candia L’INTERDICTIONCandia DES Petroplus PSA SanoGoodyear LICENCIEMENTSPSAArcelorPetroplus Crise économique : derrière les grandes déclarations Page 8 E L’annonce du projet de fermeture de l’usine Goodyear epuis 6 ans, à l’initiative du syndicat En 2007, la direction proposait un accord échan- 1,20 CGT largement majoritaire dans l’usine, geant travail en continu, 24 h / 24 par 4 équipes d’Amiens-Nord est une nouvelle démonstration de la les salariéEs de Goodyear se sont battuEs tournantes, avec 450 puis 800 suppressions F: tant pour la défense des conditions de d'emplois, contre un investissement de 52 mil- volonté du patronat de poursuivre la liquidation de milliers Dtravail que contre les suppressions d’emplois. lions d'euros seulement si les conditions étaient d’emplois pour satisfaire la rapacité des actionnaires.
    [Show full text]
  • Intentions De Vote Île-De-France
    Intentions de vote Île-de-France Note à la commission des sondages Février 2021 15 place de la République 75003 Paris Les indications générales sur le sondage Nom de l’organisme ayant réalisé le sondage : OpinionWay Nom et qualité du/des commanditaire(s) du sondage : LREM Nom et qualité de l’acheteur du sondage : LREM Gratification sous forme de points cumulables, dont le Existence d’une gratification : montant s’élève à 0,50 € pour un questionnaire complété. « Toute personne a la droit de consulter auprès de la Commission des sondages la notice prévue par l’article 3. Cette commission rend publique cette notice sur son service de communication au public en ligne. http://www.commission-des-sondages.fr/notices/ » Notice à la Commission des sondages – Février 2021 2 La méthodologie Echantillon de 1017 personnes inscrites sur les listes électorales, issu d’un échantillon de 1112 personnes, représentatif de la population de la région âgée de 18 ans et plus. L’échantillon est constitué selon la méthode des quotas, au regard des critères de sexe, d’âge, de catégorie socioprofessionnelle, de catégorie d’agglomération et de département de résidence. L’échantillon a été interrogé par questionnaire auto-administré en ligne sur système CAWI (Computer Assisted Web Interview). Les interviews ont été réalisées du 19 au 21 janvier 2021 L’enquête a été réalisée dans le cadre d’une enquête ad hoc. La colonne de référence que nous avons choisie pour le résultat publié des intentions de vote est le redressement sociodémographique + vote au premier de l’élection présidentielle de 2017 sur les certains d’aller voter.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Climat Électoral À Bordeaux Dans La Perspective Des Élections Municipales De Mars 2020
    Le climat électoral à Bordeaux dans la perspective des élections municipales de mars 2020 Notice technique FD/SS N° 117079 Contacts Ifop : Frédéric Dabi / Sébastien Sibai Département Opinion et Stratégies d'Entreprise TEL : 01 45 84 14 44 [email protected] FEVRIER 2020 Méthodologie Ce document présente les résultats d’une étude réalisée par l’Ifop. Elle respecte fidèlement les principes scientifiques et déontologiques de l’enquête par sondage. Les enseignements qu’elle indique reflètent un état de l’opinion à l’instant de sa réalisation et non pas une prédiction. Aucune publication totale ou partielle ne peut être faite sans l’accord exprès de l’Ifop. Etude Ifop-Fiducial pour CNews et Sud Radio Echantillon L’enquête a été menée auprès d’un échantillon de 607 personnes, représentatif de la population de Bordeaux âgée de 18 ans et plus inscrite sur les listes électorales. Méthodologie La représentativité de l’échantillon a été assurée par la méthode des quotas (sexe, âge, profession de l’interviewé) après stratification par quartier. Mode de recueil Les interviews ont été réalisées par téléphone du 3 au 6 février 2020. Les questions ont été placées à la suite des questions permettant Conditions d’établir les quotas. d’interrogation Les interviewés n’ont fait l’objet d’aucune rétribution. L’enquête a fait l’objet d’un redressement sociodémographique (données INSEE 2016) et d’un redressement politique sur la base de la reconstitution des votes suivants : municipales 2014 1er tour, présidentielle 2017 1er tour. NOTICE TECHNIQUE : Ifop-Fiducial pour CNews et Sud Radio 2 Le climat électoral à Bordeaux dans la perspective des élections municipales de mars 2020 Février 2020 Précision relative aux marges d’erreur La théorie statistique permet de mesurer l’incertitude à attacher à chaque résultat d’une enquête.
    [Show full text]
  • A Countrywide Experiment on Voter Choice in France
    Will a Five-Minute Discussion Change Your Mind? A Countrywide Experiment on Voter Choice in France Vincent Pons Working Paper 16-079 Will a Five-Minute Discussion Change Your Mind? A Countrywide Experiment on Voter Choice in France Vincent Pons Harvard Business School Working Paper 16-079 Copyright © 2016, 2017 by Vincent Pons Working papers are in draft form. This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies of working papers are available from the author. WILL A FIVE-MINUTE DISCUSSION CHANGE YOUR MIND? ∗ A COUNTRYWIDE EXPERIMENT ON VOTER CHOICE IN FRANCE Vincent Pons Harvard Business School† March 2017 Abstract This paper provides the rst estimate of the eect of door-to-door canvassing on ac- tual electoral outcomes, via a countrywide experiment embedded in François Hollande's campaign in the 2012 French presidential election. While existing experiments random- ized door-to-door visits at the individual level, the scale of this campaign (ve million doors knocked) enabled randomization by precinct, the level at which vote shares are recorded administratively. Visits did not aect turnout, but increased Hollande's vote share in the rst round and accounted for one fourth of his victory margin in the second. Visits' impact persisted in later elections, suggesting a lasting persuasion eect. JEL Codes: C93, D72, D83, O52 ∗I am grateful to Esther Duo, Benjamin Olken, Stephen Ansolabehere, Daniel Posner, Alan Gerber, Todd Rogers, Daniel Hidalgo, Jens Hainmueller, Daron Acemoglu, and Benjamin Marx for suggestions that have improved the paper.
    [Show full text]
  • In Support of Philippe Poutou
    In support of Philippe Poutou https://internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article4917 France/Spanish state In support of Philippe Poutou - IV Online magazine - 2017 - IV507 - April 2017 - Publication date: Friday 7 April 2017 Copyright © International Viewpoint - online socialist magazine - All rights reserved Copyright © International Viewpoint - online socialist magazine Page 1/3 In support of Philippe Poutou The first round of the French presidential elections will take place on Sunday 22 April. These elections are particularly unpredicatable. The original leading front-runner of the traditional right-wing party, François Fillon of Les Républicains, has been hard hit by accusations of personal corruption. Marine Le Pen of the far-right has also been accused of using European parliament monery to fund party workers for the NF at its Paris headquarters. The current polls show Le Pen and the "neither left nor right" former minister of the Hollande government Emmanuel Macron going through to the second round, with Macron predicted to beat Le Pen. At the same time Jean-Luc Mélenchon, supported by his specially created movement "France Insoumise" and, more reluctantly, the constituent parties of the Front de gauche, has overtaken the official Socialist Party candidate Benoît Hamon. This latter has been deserted by a number of leading SP figures including former prime minister Manuel Valls in favour of Macron. [1] However a recent television debate with all eleven candidate threw the spotlight onto the "minor" candidates, and notably Philippe Poutou of the New Anticapitalist Party. Poutou made headlines around the world by his attacks on Fillon and Le Pen. [2] In this statement Anticapitalistas, a current inside Podemos and section of the Fourth Internationa in th Spanish state, declares its support for the Poutou NPA candidature.
    [Show full text]
  • Euroscepticism, Europhobia and Eurocriticism. the Radical Parties
    CHAPTER I Euroscepticism: The State of the Issue 1. Definitional problems The term Eurosceptic appeared in the British press in the mid-1980s to qualify the reservations and criticisms that the Premier Margaret Thatcher had of the European Community. Since then its usage has been synonymic for anti-common market and, more precisely, equivalent to all the intense, direct criticism of the process of European integration. This was reinforced after Thatcher’s famous speech at the College of Europe in Bruges (22 September 1988), in full opposition of an alleged “centralisation” of Brussels, the “all embracing nature” of EU bureaucracy and the risk of moving towards a European super-state1. Although Eurosceptiscism appeared as a distinctively British phenome- non, it became generalised – in varying degrees – in other community members and this has helped to reinforce the fortunes of the term, especially since it has become a permanent structural datum of the European political landscape. It has therefore overcome de facto the classic thesis of British exceptionalism with regard to the EU from the moment that the attitudes of reservation and/or rejection were significantly manifested in the vast majority of states. Although the term Eurosceptic has a journalistic origin, not an academic one, European policy specialists have eagerly taken to providing it with a theoretical and empirical operating status. This expression, as well as other diverse terms such as Europhobia, Eurocyinism or Europessimism are – at the outset – media labels that only very imperfectly identify ideological values and/or strategies of political elites and where appropriate, of public opinion. All were journalistic indicators rather than genuine, formal concepts of political 1 The Oxford English Dictionary defines a Eurosceptic as “a person who is not enthusiastic about increasing the powers of the European Union”.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Le Pen and the 'New' FN: a Change of Style Or of Substance?
    Parliamentary Affairs (2013) 66, 179–196 doi:10.1093/pa/gss076 Marine Le Pen and the ‘New’ FN: A Change of Style or of Substance? James Shields* School of Languages and Social Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK Downloaded from *Correspondence: [email protected] The electoral challenge of the far right is an enduringly problematic feature of con- temporary French politics. In the first rounds of the 2012 presidential and parlia- mentary elections, the Front National (FN) under new leader Marine Le Pen http://pa.oxfordjournals.org/ attracted a combined total of ten million votes, bringing its ultra-nationalist pol- icies to the centre of national political debate. This article examines the FN’s impact on these elections and its implications for French politics. Drawing on of- ficial FN programmes, detailed election results and a range of opinion polling data, it assesses the strength of support for Le Pen and her party and seeks to explain their electoral appeal. In particular, it subjects to analysis the claim that the new leader has ‘de-demonised’ the FN, transforming it from perennial outsider by guest on December 15, 2012 to normal participant in mainstream French politics; and it reflects on the strategic dilemma posed for the centre-right by this newly invigorated far-right challenge. 1. Introduction The first round of the presidential election on 22 April 2012 set a new high point for the far right in France. With 17.9% of the vote, Marine Le Pen finished behind the Socialist candidate Franc¸ois Hollande (28.6%) and the outgoing centre-right president Nicolas Sarkozy (27.2%).
    [Show full text]