Bushrod Washington Hunter 1807-1888
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
GEORGE WASHINGTON's MOUNT VERNON (Slide: Aerial View) When George Washington Died in 1799, His Mount Vernon Estate Was at Its Hi
GEORGE WASHINGTON'S MOUNT VERNON (Slide: Aerial View) When George Washington died in 1799, his Mount Vernon estate was at its highest point of development. In the 45 years since he had become master of Mount Vernon, Washington had completely transformed the small plantation he had inherited from his older half brother, Lawrence. This aerial view shows the estate as it appears today, and we believe, as it appeared during the final years of General Washington's life. Mount Vernon's preservation is the achievement of the Mount Vernon Ladies' Association of the Union, which has owned the estate since 1858. Over the years, the goal of the Association has been to restore Mount Vernon to its original condition and to present it to the public. (Slide: East Front) Today our visitors see Washington/s 500 acre "Mansion House Form," the formal pleasure grounds of the 8,000 acre plantation that existed in the 18th century. The Mansion House itself, seated on a high bluff with a commanding view of the Potomac River and the Maryland shoreline beyond,is the focal point in a village-like setting of outbuildings, formal gardens and grounds .. This neat and elegant estate was the creation of George Washington, who personally designed and laid it out. (Slide: Houdon Bust) Washington is of course best remembered for his services as ~ommonder-in-Chief and president, but at Mount Vernon we celebrate -2- the memory of the Virginia farmer and family man. There are many monuments to George Washington. The visitor to Mount Vernon can discover the complex and passionate man behind the austere, remote historical figure. -
Minority Report: John Marshall and the Defense of the Alien and Sedition Acts
OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL VOLUME 68, NUMBER 2, 2007 Minority Report: John Marshall and the Defense of the Alien and Sedition Acts KURT T. LASH* ALICIA HARRSON** In 1799, the Federalist minority of the Virginia House of Delegates produced an extended defense of the Alien and Sedition Acts. This Minority Report responded to Madison's famous Virginia Resolutions and efforts by Virginia Republicans to tar the Adams Administration with having exceeded its powers under the federal Constitution. Originally attributed to John Marshall by biographerAlbert Beveridge, recent biographies of Marshall have omitted the episode or rejected Beveridge's claim and the current editors of the Papers of John Marshall omitted the Minority Report from their multi-volume collection of Marshall's work. What was once an assumed (if controversial) episode in Marshall's career has disappeared from otherwise exhaustive accounts of his life and work. As in Philip K. Dick's story, Minority Report, an alternate view of events has been unceremoniously erasedfrom the official record. The authors of this Article challenge the decision to remove Marshall's name from the Minority Report. Marshall was the only person named at the time as the probable author, and Marshallhad both reason and opportunity to draft the Address. The arguments of the Report not only track Marshall's views on the Constitution, they utilize constitutional arguments that were * Professor of Law and W. Joseph Ford Fellow, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles. B.A., Whitman College; J.D., Yale Law School. I thank the wonderful staff at the Huntington Research Library for their invaluable assistance locating innumerable primary documents. -
The Constitution in the Supreme Court: the Powers of the Federal Courts, 1801-1835 David P
The Constitution in the Supreme Court: The Powers of the Federal Courts, 1801-1835 David P. Curriet In an earlier article I attempted to examine critically the con- stitutional work of the Supreme Court in its first twelve years.' This article begins to apply the same technique to the period of Chief Justice John Marshall. When Marshall was appointed in 1801 the slate was by no means clean; many of our lasting principles of constitutional juris- prudence had been established by his predecessors. This had been done, however, in a rather tentative and unobtrusive manner, through suggestions in the seriatim opinions of individual Justices and through conclusory statements or even silences in brief per curiam announcements. Moreover, the Court had resolved remark- ably few important substantive constitutional questions. It had es- sentially set the stage for John Marshall. Marshall's long tenure divides naturally into three periods. From 1801 until 1810, notwithstanding the explosive decision in Marbury v. Madison,2 the Court was if anything less active in the constitutional field than it had been before Marshall. Only a dozen or so cases with constitutional implications were decided; most of them concerned relatively minor matters of federal jurisdiction; most of the opinions were brief and unambitious. Moreover, the cast of characters was undergoing rather constant change. Of Mar- shall's five original colleagues, William Cushing, William Paterson, Samuel Chase, and Alfred Moore had all been replaced by 1811.3 From the decision in Fletcher v. Peck4 in 1810 until about 1825, in contrast, the list of constitutional cases contains a succes- t Harry N. -
Washington and Yorba
GENEALOGY OF THE WASHINGTON AND YORBA AND RELATED FAMILIES OUN1Y C/'.\Llf ORNIP ORA~\G~ . COG .' \CJ.\L SOC\E1)' GtNtJ\L Washington and Related Families - Washington Family Chart I M- Amphillus Twigden 6 Lawrence Washington 001-5. Thomas Washington, b. c. 1605, Margaret (Butler) Washington d. in Spain while a page to Prince Charles (later King Charles II) 1623. 001-1. Robert Washington, b. c. 1589, Unmd. eldest son and heir, d.s.p. 1610 Chart II 001-2. Sir John Washington of Thrapston, d. May 18, 1688. 1 Lawrence Washington M- 1st - Mary Curtis, d. Jan. 1, 1624 or Amphillus (Twigden) Washington 2 25, and bur. at Islip Ch. • M- 2nd - Dorothy Pargiter, d. Oct. 15, 002-1. John Washington, b. in Eng. 1678. 3 1632 or 1633, and emg. to VA c. 1659. He was b. at Warton Co. Lancaster, Eng. 001-3. Sir William Washington of He settled at Bridge's Creek, VA, and d. Packington, b. c. 1594, bur. Jun. 22, Jan. 1677. 1643, St. Martin's m the Field, M- 1st - Anne Pope, dtr of Nathaniel Middlesex Pope of Pope's Creek, VA. M- Anne Villiers 4 M- 2nd - Anne Brett M- 3rd - Ann Gerrard M- 4th - Frances Gerrard Speke Peyton 001-4. Lawrence Washington 5 Appleton 7 1 He was knighted at Newmarkel, Feb. 2 1, 1622 or 23. He 002-2. Lawrence Washington, bap. at and other members of his family often visited Althorpe, the Tring, Co. Hertfordshire, Jun. 18, 1635, home of the Spencers. He is buried in the Parish Ch. -
Editing Marshall, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 823 (2000)
UIC Law Review Volume 33 Issue 4 Article 10 Summer 2000 Editing Marshall, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 823 (2000) Charles F. Hobson Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, Judges Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Legal History Commons, Legal Profession Commons, and the Legal Writing and Research Commons Recommended Citation Charle F. Hobson, Editing Marshall, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 823 (2000) https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview/vol33/iss4/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UIC Law Open Access Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UIC Law Review by an authorized administrator of UIC Law Open Access Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EDITING MARSHALL CHARLES F. HOBSON* INTRODUCTION The Papers of John Marshall is an enterprise devoted to producing a Marshall legacy: the first annotated edition of his correspondence and-papers. This project is nearing completion, though not soon enough to coincide with the bicentennial of his appointment as Chief Justice of the United States. In February 2000, the University of North Carolina Press published Volume 10, which covers the years 1824 through March 1827. The complete edition of twelve or thirteen volumes should be finished in five or six years. Enough time has elapsed since the first volume was published more than a quarter century ago to offer a preliminary appraisal of the ways in which this multi-volume edition enhanced the study of both Marshall the man and Marshall the jurist. To carry out this assignment I will consider three broad areas: (1) his education and practice as a lawyer in late eighteenth-century Virginia; (2) his three decades as Chief Justice of the United States, during which time he sat not only on the Supreme Court but also on the United States Circuit Courts for Virginia and North Carolina; and (3) lastly, his life off the bench, including his roles as historian and biographer, enterprising landowner, and family chieftain. -
The Lowest Ebb of Misery: Death and Mourning in the Family of George Washington
"The Lowest Ebb of Misery: Death and Mourning in the Family of George Washington By Mary V. Thompson A Talk Given at a Symposium Entitled "What Shall I Wear? 18'''_ Century Accessories: Completing the Look" Gadsby's Tavern Museum Saturday, October 2,1999 Slightly amended, 10/8/1999 & 10/15/1999 While every person who has ever lived has had to face death, both their own and that of the people they love, typical modem-day Americans have, to a great degree, tried to distance themselves from death. The subject is uncomfortable for most people to discuss, our loved ones die in the sterile environment of a hospital or nursing home, and after their deaths, strangers prepare their bodies for burial. Afterwards, the death of a loved one and its impact on the survivors is virtually denied; surviving family members wear bright colors, continue to take part in work and social activities, and anyone meeting them during the course of those activities has no idea that their emotional control may be quite problematic. How different this is from the situation in much of the world today and in ethnic neighborhoods in our own country.' The majority of my I According to the author's father, this change in American practice is fairly recent. At least as late as the 19305 and 19405, when he was growing up in St. Louis. Missouri. the death of a loved one was signalled by men wearing armbands on their left arms and by placing a black wreath on the front door of the deceased's home. -
George Washington Papers
George Washington Papers A Finding Aid to the Collection in the Library of Congress Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 2009 Revised 2016 September Contact information: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mss.contact Additional search options available at: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/eadmss.ms008068 LC Online Catalog record: http://lccn.loc.gov/mm78044693 Prepared by Manuscript Division staff Collection Summary Title: George Washington Papers Span Dates: 1592-1943 Bulk Dates: (bulk 1748-1799) ID No.: MSS44693 Creator: Washington, George, 1732-1799 Extent: 77,000 items ; 506 containers plus 19 oversize ; 215.2 linear feet ; 125 microfilm reels Language: Collection material in English Location: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Summary: United States president, United States Army officer, and patriot. Correspondence, letterbooks, diaries, accounts, military papers, and other papers documenting Washington's relations with the Continental Congress, his command of the Continental Army, his presidency, and other aspects of his career. Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the Library's online catalog. They are grouped by name of person or organization, by subject or location, and by occupation and listed alphabetically therein. People Adams, John, 1735-1826--Correspondence. Adams, Samuel, 1722-1803--Correspondence. Bland, Theodorick, 1742-1790--Correspondence. Boucher, Jonathan, 1738-1804--Correspondence. Boudinot, Elias, 1740-1821--Correspondence. Burgoyne, John, 1722-1792--Correspondence. Carrington, Edward, 1749-1810--Correspondence. Carroll, Charles, 1737-1832--Correspondence. Dayton, Jonathan, 1760-1824--Correspondence. Dinwiddie, Robert, 1693-1770--Correspondence. Duer, William, 1747-1799--Correspondence. Forman, David, 1745-1797--Correspondence. -
Nomination Form
(Rev. 10-90) NPS Form 10-900 OMB KO. 10240018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM 1ll.i !s,rm I> <fir ..it. I? m>ntna:,n? tr rcq~erllnpdutcnnlz~Jl~.,rl,i.?r tndv .lud propcnlci 2nd dtjm;o \cc !nsouctlnnr III H.>*t~(',,~lple~c ihr \rtlJ-;ll Kcglscn .,I I1 .I Jrz; 1'1~1. Kct.:strauJo r%lnl11N311)01131KV:I,IC~ 11~lIellnlI,A, ('~mplcleeach Item b) marl~ng"\' m thc spprcwnatc 09th or n,, r.ntc.!~?gtnc tt~l.m~tl~rn rur .c,lr..! I: am ttrm .!r,tlalsp?') s [hc pr8ven) betnp dw.ntmrpd. enter "Y :\ ' ior "nota~~l~r~blc'. tor iun;t~rn~.~r~h~~~~~1~1_11 .. .I(.~I~..?~~oPm?!~.r~~l. 2n.1 . , ~, ~~ ~~ ~~ ..--...--..u..,..-.-..-. ",-." areas ofsignificance, enter only categories and subcategories from the insructions Place additional enmes andnarrative items on cmhnuahoo sheetr (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word ormessor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Bushfield (DHR Number 096-G952) other namestsite number Bushfield Manor 2. Location sneet &number 367 Club House Loop (State Route 708) not for publication city or town Mount Holly vicinity state Virginia code VA county Weshoreland code 193 Zip 22524 3. StatelFederal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this IX nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentatiou standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. -
PLANTATION LIFE at GEORGE WASHINGTON's MOUNT VERNON, 1754 to 1799 by Gwendolyn K. White a Dissertation
COMMERCE AND COMMUNITY: PLANTATION LIFE AT GEORGE WASHINGTON’S MOUNT VERNON, 1754 TO 1799 by Gwendolyn K. White A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy History Committee: ___________________________________________ Director ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ __________________________________________ Department Chairperson ___________________________________________ Program Director ___________________________________________ Dean, College of Humanities and Social Sciences Date: _____________________________________ Spring Semester 2016 George Mason University Fairfax, VA Commerce and Community: Plantation Life at George Washington’s Mount Vernon, 1754 to 1799 A Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at George Mason University by Gwendolyn K. White Master of Architectural History University of Virginia 2003 Bachelor of Individualized Studies George Mason University, 2000 Director: Cynthia A. Kierner, Professor Department of History Spring Semester 2016 George Mason University Fairfax, VA This work is licensed under a creative commons attribution-noderivs 3.0 unported license. ii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated in memory of my parents, Walter and Madelyn Berns, and my husband, Egon Verheyen. I wish you were here, but I feel your pride. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS -
Fifty Years of the Washington Papers
Washingto Pn ap ers WINTER 2018 Fifty Years of The Washington Papers William M. Ferraro , senior AssociAte editor As we celebrate The Washington Papers’ 50th anniversary (more support from the National Historical Publications Commission details on back cover), we reflect on our project’s origins. (NHPC), a federal agency that since has become the National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC). 5 Virginia state archivist William J. Van Schreeven and University of Virginia (UVA) president Edgar J. Shannon, Jr., played critical roles Jackson assembled a staff in refurbished space in Alderman Library in founding The Washington Papers. In a proposal dated Oct. 18, 1966, and directed efforts to locate, organize, and transcribe documents. 6 Van Shreeven called for a comprehensive edition of the papers of He also considered a plan to catalog documents, which were pouring George Washington. 1 Shannon into the office, on a mainframe responded, forming a committee in computer—only to abandon it later January 1967 to explore the venture. 2 for being too complex. 7 Decades passed before friendlier software ended The committee’s endorsement prompted reliance on card files. a search in early spring 1968 that targeted Donald Jackson, who then A consequential early decision was hiring directed the University of Illinois Press. Dorothy Twohig as associate editor Jackson believed that he lacked a because of her experience as an editor suitable background, but Shannon with the Papers of Alexander Hamilton. 8 “and the search committee explained Twohig joined the Papers of George that they were seeking not so much Washington in summer 1969 and filled a Washington scholar as someone who A writing desk on display at many roles until her retirement as editor had experienced the trials of running George Washington’s Mount Vernon. -
Originalism, John Marshall, and the Necessary and Proper Clause: Resurrecting the Jurisprudence of Alexander Addison
Cleveland State Law Review Volume 58 Issue 3 Article 3 2010 Originalism, John Marshall, and the Necessary and Proper Clause: Resurrecting the Jurisprudence of Alexander Addison Patrick J. Charles Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Jurisprudence Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Patrick J. Charles, Originalism, John Marshall, and the Necessary and Proper Clause: Resurrecting the Jurisprudence of Alexander Addison, 58 Clev. St. L. Rev. 529 (2010) available at https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev/vol58/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ORIGINALISM, JOHN MARSHALL, AND THE NECESSARY AND PROPER CLAUSE: RESURRECTING THE JURISPRUDENCE OF ALEXANDER ADDISON PATRICK J. CHARLES* I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 529 II. THE UNFORTUNATE CASE OF ALEXANDER ADDISON .......... 531 III. WASHINGTON, MARSHALL, ADDISON, AND THE 1798 ALIEN ACT........................................................................... 536 IV. THE NECESSARY AND PROPER CLAUSE AND ADDISON’S “CHOICE OF MEANS” DOCTRINE.......................................... 545 V. THE IMPEACHMENTS OF ADDISON AND SAMUEL CHASE— THE FINAL IMPETUS IN MARSHALL ADOPTING THE “CHOICE OF MEANS” DOCTRINE.......................................... 555 VI. CONCLUSION—ADDISON’S LEGACY IN AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE ................................................................... 572 I. INTRODUCTION In the recently decided United States v. Comstock,1 the Supreme Court invoked the long standing “choice of means” doctrine when it interpreted a federal criminal statute through the Necessary and Proper Clause.2 The statute, 18 U.S.C. -
Justice Bushrod Washington and the Age of Discovery in American Law
Volume 102 Issue 4 Article 4 June 2000 Justice Bushrod Washington and the Age of Discovery in American Law David A. Faber Southern District of West Virginia Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr Part of the Judges Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation David A. Faber, Justice Bushrod Washington and the Age of Discovery in American Law, 102 W. Va. L. Rev. (2000). Available at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr/vol102/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the WVU College of Law at The Research Repository @ WVU. It has been accepted for inclusion in West Virginia Law Review by an authorized editor of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Faber: Justice Bushrod Washington and the Age of Discovery in American L JUSTICE BUSHROD WASHINGTON AND THE AGE OF DISCOVERY IN AMERICAN LAW DavidA. Faber* I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... 735 II. THE AGE OFDISCoVERY: 1781-1830 ........................................ 738 m. A JUSTICE'S PREPARATION: 1762-:1798 ..................................... 743 IV. PRINCIPAL OPINIONS OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON: 1799-1829 ....751 A. ConstitutionalLitigation ............................................... 753 B. Prize Law and Marine Insurance ................................ 770 C. Western Lands .............................................................. 786 D. Slavery and Federal Crimes ........................................ 800 V. CONCLUSION .............................................................................. 804 I. INTRODUCTION Bushrod Washington was appointed to the United States Supreme Court by President John Adams in 1798.1 Nephew of George Washington, committed to the principles of the Federalist Party, and only thirty-six years old, he was the youngest Justice ever appointed to the Court at that time.2 Washington would serve on the Court until his death in 1829, a period of nearly thirty-one years.