DOCSLIB.ORG

SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2008 a Comprehensive Operational and a Summarised Operational and Financial Five Years’ Detailed Financial and Financial Overview of Shell

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2008 a Comprehensive Operational and a Summarised Operational and Financial Five Years’ Detailed Financial and Financial Overview of Shell SHARE YOUR OPINION Please let us know your views on this report, or any SHELL ANNUAL REPORTS issues it raises, by e-mail to [email protected] PHOTOGRAPHY BY SHELL STAFF Some of the photos in this report were taken by Shell staff who were invited to show what sustainable development meant to them in action around the world. PAPER SPECIFICATION The paper used is made from 25% de-inked post-consumer waste, 25% pre-consumer waste and 50% virgin fibre under ISO 14001. All pulps are Elemental Chlorine Free. The use of the FSC logo identifies products which contain wood from well-managed forests certified in accordance with the rules of the Forest Stewardship Council. Designed by Flag Printed by Taylor Bloxham under ISO 14001 Annual Report and Form 20-F for the Annual Review and Summary Financial Financial and Operational Information year ended December 31, 2008 Statements 2008 2004–2008 ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2008 A comprehensive operational and A summarised operational and financial Five years’ detailed financial and financial overview of Shell. overview of Shell. operational information, including maps. CAUTIONARY NOTE Jaaroverzicht en verkorte jaarrekening The companies in which Royal Dutch Shell plc directly and indirectly owns investments are 2008 separate entities. In this publication “Shell”, “Shell group” and “Royal Dutch Shell” are sometimes used for convenience where references are made to Royal Dutch Shell plc and its subsidiaries in Dutch language version. RESPONSIBLE ENERGY general. Likewise, the words “we”, “us” and “our” are also used to refer to subsidiaries in general or to those who work for them. These expressions are also used where no useful purpose is served by identifying the particular company or companies. ‘‘Subsidiaries’’, “Shell subsidiaries” and “Shell companies” as used in this publication refer to companies in which Royal Dutch Shell either directly OTHER PUBLICATIONS SUSTAINABILITY REPORT or indirectly has control, by having either a majority of the voting rights or the right to exercise a controlling influence. The companies in which Shell has significant influence but not control are referred to as “associated companies” or “associates” and companies in which Shell has joint control Shell Technology Report are referred to as “jointly controlled entities”. In this publication, associates and jointly controlled An overview of 27 advanced technologies. entities are also referred to as “equity-accounted investments”. The term “Shell interest” is used for convenience to indicate the direct and/or indirect (for example, through our 34% shareholding in www.shell.com/technology Woodside Petroleum Ltd.) ownership interest held by Shell in a venture, partnership or company, after exclusion of all third-party interest. Shell General Business Principles This publication contains forward-looking statements concerning the financial condition, results of Fundamental principles that govern how operations and businesses of Royal Dutch Shell. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are each Shell company conducts its affairs. statements of future expectations that are based on management’s current expectations and www.shell.com/sgbp assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning the Shell Code of Conduct potential exposure of Royal Dutch Shell to market risks and statements expressing management’s Standards of behaviour expected expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as ‘‘anticipate’’, ‘‘believe’’, ‘‘could’’, from employees. ‘‘estimate’’, ‘‘expect’’, ‘‘intend’’, ‘‘may’’, ‘‘plan’’, ‘‘objectives’’, ‘‘outlook’’, ‘‘probably’’, ‘‘project’’, www.shell.com/codeofconduct ‘‘will’’, ‘‘seek’’, ‘‘target’’, ‘‘risks’’, ‘‘goals’’, ‘‘should’’ and similar terms and phrases. There are a number of factors that could affect the future operations of Royal Dutch Shell and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements included in this publication, including (without limitation): (a) price fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas; (b) changes in demand for the Group’s products; (c) currency fluctuations; (d) drilling and production results; (e) reserve estimates; (f) loss of market share and industry competition; (g) environmental and physical risks; (h) risks associated with the identification of suitable potential acquisition properties and targets, and successful negotiation and completion of such transactions; (i) the risk of doing business in developing countries and countries subject to international sanctions; (j) Shell Sustainability Report 2008 Shell Sustainability Review 2008 legislative, fiscal and regulatory developments including potential litigation and regulatory effects Report on progress in contributing to A summarised report on progress in arising from recategorisation of reserves; (k) economic and financial market conditions in various countries and regions; (l) political risks, including the risks of expropriation and renegotiation sustainable development. contributing to sustainable development. of the terms of contracts with governmental entities, delays or advancements in the approval of projects and delays in the reimbursement for shared costs; and (m) changes in trading conditions. All forward-looking statements contained in this publication are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Additional factors that may affect future results are contained in Royal Dutch Shell’s 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (available at www. shell.com/investor and www.sec.gov ). These factors also should be considered by the reader. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this publication, 08 May 2009. Neither Royal Dutch Shell nor any of its subsidiaries undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise AVAILABLE FROM any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or other information. In light of these risks, results could differ materially from those stated, implied or inferred from the www.shell.com/annualreport Royal Dutch Shell plc Annual Report/20-F Service for forward-looking statements contained in this publication. The online reports have interactive c/o Bankside US residents – Tel +1 888 400 7789 The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) permits oil and gas companies, in tools to generate charts and to Tel +44 (0)1635 232 700 their filings with the SEC, to disclose only proved reserves that a company has demonstrated by actual production or conclusive formation tests to be economically and legally producible under download pdfs by chapter. E-mail [email protected] existing economic and operating conditions. We use certain terms in this publication that SEC’s Financial tables can be downloaded guidelines strictly prohibit us from including in filings with the SEC. U.S. Investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 20-F, File No 1-32575, available on the SEC website as Excel files. www.sec.gov. You can also obtain these forms from the SEC by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. RESPONSIBLE ENERGY ADDITIONAL WEB CONTENT SHELL AND This Report is supported on the Shell website with THE ENERGY additional environmental, social and financial performance data and more detailed information on CHALLENGE our approach to sustainable development and related issues. Web links on each page show where to find INTRODUCTION 1 this information. WHO WE ARE AND WHAT WE DO 2 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS We have key performance indicators that were FUTURE ENERGY SYSTEM 4 developed with our stakeholders. These enable us to OUR STRATEGY 6 track our performance, and help us better manage efforts across our operations for these key global OUR APPROACH 8 environmental and social impacts. These are the INTERVIEW WITH OUR CHIEF EXECUTIVE 10 same indicators we use internally when we assess CLIMATE CHANGE 12 our sustainable development performance in our Shell Scorecard. DON’T JUST TAKE OUR WORD FOR IT A committee of external experts has once again reviewed the balance, completeness and responsiveness of this Report. GRI BUILDING A We continue to use the Global Reporting Initiative’s RESPONSIBLE G3 guidelines. Information is available on ENERGY FUTURE www.shell.com/gri. MORE UPSTREAM OIL 14 CLEANER FUEL FOR POWER 17 NIGERIA 20 MORE SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT 22 CLEANER PRODUCTS 24 PEARL GAS TO LIQUIDS 25 RESPONSIBLE OPERATIONS OUR NEIGHBOURS 26 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 29 PERSONAL AND PROCESS SAFETY 32 JOINT VENTURES, CONTRACTORS AND SUPPLIERS 34 CHEMICALS IN SINGAPORE 35 EXTERNAL RECOGNITION MEASURING OUR PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE DATA 36 EXTERNAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 38 OUR APPROACH TO REPORTING 40 FACT SHEET (INSIDE BACK COVER) Included in the Carbon Disclosure Project’s Carbon Disclosure Leadership Index. i Shell Sustainability Report 2008 INTRODUCTION 1 INTRODUCTION WHO WE ARE AND WHAT WE DO 2 FUTURE ENERGY SYSTEM 4 OUR STRATEGY 6 OUR APPROACH 8 INTERVIEW WITH OUR CHIEF EXECUTIVE 10 CLIMATE CHANGE 12 “
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Energy Return on Investment for Algal Biofuel
    Using TEA/LCA as a Design Tool: Results for a 100-ha Facility Corresponding Journal Article: Economically competitive algal biofuel production in a 100-ha facility: a comprehensive techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment C.M. Beal*, L.N. Gerber, D.L. Sills, M.E. Huntley, S. Machesky, J.W. Tester, I. Archibald, J. Granados, C.H. Greene Algal Research, In Review (Pre-prints Available) Cornell Marine Algal Biofuels Consortium 1 Cornell Marine Algal Biofuels Consortium (Funding: Shell 2007 - 2011, DOE/USDA 2011 - 2014) Strain Selection: Staurosira sp. (diatom) and Desmodesmus sp. (green) selected from >500 isolates for yield and settling 2 Cornell Marine Algal Biofuels Consortium (Funding: Shell 2007 - 2011, DOE/USDA 2011 - 2014) Strain Selection: Staurosira sp. (diatom) and Desmodesmus sp. (green) selected from >500 isolates for yield and settling Kona Demonstration Facility (Cellana LLC): 0.5-ha hybrid PBR-Pond cultivation yielded ~3 tons of biomass per month 3 Cornell Marine Algal Biofuels Consortium (Funding: Shell 2007 - 2011, DOE/USDA 2011 - 2014) Strain Selection: Staurosira sp. (diatom) and Desmodesmus sp. (green) selected from >500 isolates for yield and settling 20.0 40.0 Kona Demonstration Staurosira D) - Facility (Cellana LLC): 2 15.0 30.0 ) 0.5-ha hybrid PBR-Pond D - 2 cultivation yielded ~3 10.0 20.0 G/M tons of biomass per ( DW DW month 5.0 10.0 Production Results: (G/M PROTEIN OR LIPID PROTEIN LIPID DW 0.0 0.0 Described by Huntley et 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 al., Algal Research, In TOTAL NITROGEN Review Huntley M., et al., Actual large-scale production of marine microalgae4 for fuels and feed.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioenergy 2016 Speaker Biographies
    Speaker Biographies (Arranged Alphabetically) Contents Keynote Speakers Austin Brown .................................................................................................................................. 7 Vann Bush ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Adam Cohen ................................................................................................................................... 9 The Honorable Chuck Fleischmann.............................................................................................. 10 David Friedman ............................................................................................................................ 11 Renato Domith Godinho ............................................................................................................... 12 The Honorable Marcy Kaptur ....................................................................................................... 13 Jan Koninckx ................................................................................................................................ 14 Jonathan Male ............................................................................................................................... 15 Dennis McGinn ............................................................................................................................. 16 Rueben Sarkar ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Dutch Shell 2007 Annual Review
    Delivery and growth Royal Dutch Shell plc Annual Review and Summary Financial Statements 2007 Delivery and growth are the basis for our success. We aim to SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA deliver major new energy projects, top-quality operational e selected financial data set out below is derived, in part, from performance and competitive returns while investing in new the Consolidated Financial Statements. e selected data should developments to secure the growth of our business . be read in conjunction with the Summary Consolidated Financial Delivery is doing what we say. Growth is our future . Statements and related Notes, as well as the Summary Operating and Financial Review in this Review. With effect from 2007, wind and solar activities, which were previously reported withi n Other industry segments, are reported within the Gas & Power segment and Oil Sands activities, which were previously reported within the Exploration & Production segment, are reported as a separate segment. During 2007, the hydrogen and CO 2 coordination activities were moved from Other industry segments to the Oil Products segment and all other activities within Other industry segments are now reported within the Corporate segment. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME DATA $ million 2007 2006 2005 Revenue 355,782 318,845 306,731 Income from continuing operations 31,926 26,311 26,568 Income/(loss) from discontinued operations ––(307) Income for the period 31,926 26,311 26,261 Income attributable to minority interest 595 869 950 Income attributable to shareholders of Royal Dutch
    [Show full text]
  • Company Overview March 2012
    Biorefineries: Perspectives on Finance and Construction Moderator: Martin A. Sabarsky, CEO December 9, 2013 © Cellana Inc. 2013 Page 1 © Cellana 2013 Summary of Cellana Updates Since Last PacRim 1. Commercialization Progress A. Off-Take Agreement with Neste Oil for biofuel applications B. 2nd successful large-scale feed trial for chicken feed (fishmeal was 1st) C. Successful sampling of initial Omega-3 nutritional oils D. Multiple potential Phase 1 Commercial Facility locations being reviewed 2. Production / Technology Progress A. More than 10 different strains grown at KDF at industrial scale B. Hit minimum biomass/O3 growth rates with multiple candidate strains to progress to process optimization 3. Grants Progress A. Kick-off of ATP3 Program (DOE-funded consortium led by ASU) Page 2 © Cellana 2013 Intensive, Efficient Algae Production at the Kona Demonstration Facility (KDF) on Hawaii • 2.5 hectare site in Kona, HI • $20MM replacement cost; owned free & clear by Cellana • >750,000 liter large-scale cultivation capacity • Produced over 11 tons of microalgae since 2010 for R&D / testing purposes • Commercially significant biomass/oil yields (over 15 g/m2/day biomass yields) Page 3 © Cellana 2013 Cellana’s Biorefinery Business Model Builds on a Foundation of Biofuel Research to Address Additional Valuable Products Omega-3 nutritional oils and high-value aquaculture / animal feed products are an extension of Cellana's core competency - screening, developing, and producing algae biofuel feedstock. = oil separation $4B Omega-3 nutritional
    [Show full text]
  • Algae Biofuel Overview
    September 30 - October 3, 2013 Orlando, FL Advancing Commercialization of Algal Biofuels Through Increased Yield and Value of the Biomass Xuemei Bai, Ph.D Principal Scientist & Senior Director of R&D Cellana LLC Page 1 © Cellana 2013 Strategy for Commercialization Increase value . Multiple-product-stream business model . Increase yield of biomass . Increase yield of bio-products . New application/perspective of algae meal Reduce cost . Build upon over 5yrs of intense R&D . Integrate newest technologies into commercial algae facility Page 2 © Cellana 2013 Flexible Biorefinery Production / Revenue Model Bioproducts Generated from the Use of the Entire Algae Biomass 891kg Total per MT* (11% yield loss) $6,928 per MT (dry weight) $82 @ $100/bbl, $0.68/kg 121kg Biocrude Oil (fossil petroleum px benchmark) 2 62kg Omega-3 Oil @ $100/kg (35% conc.) (discount to algal DHA wholesale 1 px benchmark) $6,138 = oil separation 708kg Algae Meal (Residual Proteins, Sugars, Minerals, Lipids, & @ $1.00/kg Micronutrients) (premium to soymeal px benchmark; discount to fishmeal $708 px benchmark) * Reflects recovery based on initial whole algae fraction of 6% Omega-3 oils, 25% Biocrude oil, 69% Algae Meal (Protein/Sugars/Minerals/Lipids/Micronutrients), and 11% total yield loss after two separations Page 3 © Cellana 2013 ALDUO™ Cultivation Technology: Combination of the Best of Both Worlds High 100% PBRs Cost 20% PBRs / 80% Open Ponds 100% Open Ponds Low Low Risk of Contamination High Page 4 © Cellana 2013 ALDUO™ Advantages: Dramatic expansion of algal strain catalog for outdoor mass cultivation . >30 strains produced successfully outdoor . >12MT produced from >10 strains Significant reduction in contamination disruptions .
    [Show full text]
  • Biofuels and Bio-Based Chemicals: Opportunities & Barriers
    Biofuels and Bio-based Chemicals: Opportunities & Barriers Joseph B. Powell, Ph.D. Shell Chief Scientist – Chemical Engineering Shell Global Solutions (US) Inc. Houston, Texas International Conference CO2 Summit: Technology and Opportunity, June 6-10, 2010, Vail, Colorado, USA Copyright of Royal Dutch Shell plc 1 DISCLAIMER STATEMENT The companies in which Royal Dutch Shell plc directly or indirectly owns investments are separate entities. In this presentation the expressions "Shell", "Group" and "Shell Group" are sometimes used for convenience where references are made to Group companies in general. Likewise the words "we", "us" and "our" are also used to refer to Group companies in general or those who work for them. The expressions are also used where there is no purpose in identifying specific companies. The information contained in this presentation contains forward-looking statements, that are subject to risk factors which may affect the outcome of the matters covered. None of Shell International B.V., any other Shell company and their respective officers, employees and agents represents the accuracy or completeness of the information set forth in this presentation and none of the foregoing shall be liable for any loss, cost, expense or damage (whether arising from negligence or otherwise) relating to the use of such information. All copyright and other (intellectual property) rights in all text, images and other information contained in this presentation are the property of Shell International B.V. or other Shell companies. Permission should be sought from Shell International B.V. before any part of this presentation is reproduced, stored or transmitted by any means.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Annual Report and Form 20-F for the Year Ended December 31, 2008 Contact Information
    ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC ANNUAL REPORT AND FORM 20-F FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 DELIVERY & GROWTH REPORT ANNUAL REPORT AND FORM 20-F FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 OUR BUSINESS With around 102,000 employees in more than 100 countries and DOWNSTREAM territories, Shell helps to meet the world’s growing demand for Our Oil Sands business, the Athabasca Oil Sands Project, extracts energy in economically, environmentally and socially bitumen – an especially thick, heavy oil – from oil sands in responsible ways. Alberta, western Canada, and converts it to synthetic crude oils that can be turned into a range of products. UPSTREAM Our Exploration & Production business searches for and recovers Our Oil Products business makes, moves and sells a range of oil and natural gas around the world. Many of these activities petroleum-based products around the world for domestic, are carried out as joint venture partnerships, often with national industrial and transport use. Its Future Fuels and CO2 business oil companies. unit develops biofuels and hydrogen and markets the synthetic fuel and products made from the GTL process. It also leads Our Gas & Power business liquefies natural gas and transports company-wide activities in CO2 management. With around it to customers across the world. Its gas to liquids (GTL) process 45,000 service stations, ours is the world’s largest single-branded turns natural gas into cleaner-burning synthetic fuel and other fuel retail network. products. It develops wind power to generate electricity and is involved in solar power technology. It also licenses our coal Our Chemicals business produces petrochemicals for industrial gasification technology, enabling coal to be used as a chemical customers.
    [Show full text]
  • SUSTAINABILITY REPORT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2009 I Shell Sustainability Report 2009 Introduction
    SUSTAINABILITY REPORT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2009 i Shell Sustainability Report 2009 Introduction INDEX HOW WE REPORT ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INTRODUCTION i HOW WE REPORT ON SUSTAINABLE We began reporting voluntarily on our environmental and social DEVELOPMENT performance with the first Shell Report that covered 1997. Our 1 INTRODUCTION FROM THE CEO reporting focuses on the environmental and social challenges that most affect business performance and matter most to our key stakeholders. These include local communities, non-governmental SHELL AND THE ENERGY FUTURE organisations, shareholders, investors, customers, governments, 2 OUR BUSINESS employees, media, academics, contractors and suppliers. We use a 3 BUILDING A LOW-CARBON ENERGY FUTURE thorough process to select content for our reporting based on information from internal and external sources. Throughout the year 4 OUR BUSINESS STRATEGY we also provide information to the Dow Jones Sustainability 5 KEY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Indexes, FTSE4Good, the Carbon Disclosure Project and other 6 OUR APPROACH TO SUSTAINABLE organisations that help investors understand the economic, environmental and social performance of companies. DEVELOPMENT 7 INTERVIEW WITH THE CEO Internal controls such as audit trails and statistical checks help assure the accuracy of the Shell Sustainability Report. An External Review Committee of independent experts helps make sure our OUR OPERATIONS IN FOCUS reporting is balanced, relevant and responsive to stakeholders’ 8 OUR PERFORMANCE IN 2009 interests. Lloyd’s Register Quality Assurance Ltd has provided limited 10 CLIMATE CHANGE assurance of our direct greenhouse gas emissions data for 2009. 12 MANAGING OUR IMPACTS We report in accordance with the Global Reporting 16 SAFETY Initiative (GRI) and in line with the International 18 JOINT VENTURES, CONTRACTORS AND Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation Association (IPIECA) guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Energy Laboratory of Hawaii Authority
    NATURAL ENERGY LABORATORY OF HAWAII AUTHORITY An Authority of the State of Hawaii attached to the Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING MINUTES (Approved November 20, 2018) Natural Energy Laboratory of Hawaii Authority (NELHA) Tuesday, September 18, 2018 11:00 a.m. An Interactive Conference Technology will be held between the following two locations: Kailua Kona Location: Member/Designees Guests/ Staff Present NELHA Executive Conference Room Keena Hana Building Ron Whitmore (Mayor Rep) Laurence Sombardier (NELHA) 73-987 Makako Bay Drive (Gov Appointee) Karen Appleby (NELHA) Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 Robert Masuda (DLNR) Jan War (NELHA) Neil Sims (Tenant Rep) Keith Olson (NELHA) Patricia Tummons (Environment Hawaii) Glenn Jensen (Cyanotech) Matt Caster (Cyanotech) Mawae Morton (Cyanotech) Honolulu Location Linda Rosehill (Gov. Appointee) Gregory Barbour (NELHA) DBEDT Conference Room Dr. John Morton (HTDC) Bryan Yee (Deputy AG) 250 South Hotel Street, Suite 436 Mary Alice Evans (DBEDT) Karl Fooks Honolulu, HI 96813 Dr. Vasilis Syrmos (U of H) William Mielcke (Gov Appointee) Jim Wyban (RAC Secretary) Members /Designees Not Present/Excused Alan Hilton (RAC Chair) Gerry Cysewski (Tenant Rep) Michael O’Malley 73-4460 Queen Kaahumanu Hwy., #101, Kailua-Kona, Hawaii USA 96740-2637 Phone: (808) 327-9585 Fax: (808) 327-9586 Email: [email protected] Website: nelha.hawaii.gov NELHA Board of Directors Meeting Minutes (Approved November 20, 2018) September 18, 2018 Page 2 of 9 1. Call to Order. The meeting was called to order at 11:00 am. 2. Approval of July 17, 2018 NELHA Board of Directors’ Meeting Minutes. Director Evans made a motion to approve the July 17, 2018 NELHA Board of Director’s meeting and Director Mielcke seconded the motion.
    [Show full text]
  • Company Overview March 2012
    As Easy as “ABC” -- Always Be Commercializing: Cellana’s Multiproduct, Biorefinery- Based Business Model: Today, Tomorrow and in the Future Valerie Harmon, Senior Director of R&D Cellana, LLC © Cellana Inc. 2014 Page 1 © Cellana 2014 The Promise of Microalgae • Untapped resource! • Efficient harvest of the sun’s energy • Sustainable production – Salt water – Arid land – CO2 Sequestration • Simultaneous production of: – Essential nutrients – Fuels – Nutraceuticals – Chemicals – Pigments – Pharmaceuticals Page 2 © Cellana 2014 Cellana: Poised for success • A photosynthetic production system strategy that is proven to work and is sustainable. • Co-products that are commercially viable. • A biorefinery business model that will succeed. • Realizing the promise of microalgae for a sustainable future today. Page 3 © Cellana 2014 Kona Demonstration Facility A photosynthetic production strategy in action! Page 4 © Cellana 2014 Page 4 © Cellana 2014 Intensive, Efficient, Sustainable Algae Production at the Kona Demonstration Facility (KDF) on Hawaii • 2.5 hectare site in Kona, HI • >750,000 liter large-scale cultivation capacity • Produced over 13 tons of microalgae since 2010 • Commercially significant biomass/oil yields (over 15 g/m2/day biomass productivity) • Consistent, reliable year round production Page 5 © Cellana 2014 Cellana’s Analytical Capability Page 6 © Cellana 2014 Cellana’s Analytical Capability Page 7 © Cellana 2014 Cellana’s Culture Collection: • Diverse collection of non- GMO strains for valuable products • Over 100 candidate
    [Show full text]
  • N Ew S R Elea
    N E W S R EMBARGOED UNTIL: 09:00 GMT TUESDAY 11 DECEMBER 2007 E 10:00 CET, 01:00 PST, 03:00 CST, 04:00 EST (23:00 10 DEC HAWAII) L E A SHELL AND HR BIOPETROLEUM BUILD FACILITY TO GROW ALGAE FOR BIOFUEL S Royal Dutch Shell plc and HR Biopetroleum today announced the construction of a pilot facility in Hawaii to grow marine E algae and produce vegetable oil for conversion into biofuel. The announcement is a further step in Shell’s ongoing effort to develop a new generation of biofuels using sustainable, non- food raw materials. Algae hold great promise because they grow very rapidly, are rich in vegetable oil and can be cultivated in ponds of seawater, minimising the use of fertile land and fresh water. Shell and HR Biopetroleum have formed a joint venture company, called Cellana, to develop this project, with Shell taking the majority share. Construction of the demonstration facility on the Kona coast of Hawaii Island will begin immediately. The site, leased from the Natural Energy Laboratory of Hawaii Authority (NELHA), is near existing commercial algae enterprises, primarily serving the pharmaceutical and nutrition industries. The facility will grow only non-modified, marine microalgae species in open-air ponds using proprietary technology. Algae strains used will be indigenous to Hawaii or approved by the Hawaii Department of Agriculture. Protection of the local environment and marine ecosystem has been central to facility design. Once the algae are harvested, the vegetable oil will be extracted. The facility’s small production volumes will be used for testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Montreux Keynote Address from Henkel's Kasper Rorsted
    inform March 2011 March www.aocs.org Volume 22 (3) 121–180 Volume International News on Fats, Oils, and Related Materials Montreux keynote address from Henkel’s Kasper Rorsted ALSO INSIDE Health benefi ts of beans Algae as a renewable feedstock Giants of the Past: David Kritchevsky C2 inform March 2011, Vol. 22 (3) www.aocs.org March 2011 Volume 22 (3) 121–180 Departments 126 Innovative, sustainable and Information consumption: A challenge for 122 Index to Advertisers Calendar the entire value chain In our continuing coverage of the 7th World Conference on Detergents, we present an article based on the keynote presentation Marketplace: delivered by Kasper Rorsted, chief executive offi cer of Henkel AG & Co. 135 News & Noteworthy KGaA, Germany. 139 Biofuels News 131 Maybe we don’t know beans… 145 Health & Nutrition News Greater media attention is being paid to the health benefi ts of beans and legumes, but how much do we really know about the topic? 148 People News/Inside AOCS Donna M. Winham reports. Ad hoc biodiesel industry review Publications: 143 In light of changes in the biodiesel industry worldwide, AOCS 151 Patents surveyed the program committee that planned the 2nd International Congress on Biodiesel, held in November 2009, about the current and 156 Extracts & Distillates future state of the biodiesel industry. 2010 Annual Meeting of Asian Section of AOCS held 149 jointly with 6th ISBB Suk Hoo Yoon recaps the latest meeting of the Asian Section of AOCS, held during the 6th International Symposium on Biocatalysis and Biotechnology (ISBB) in Seoul, Korea. 2010 saw a healthy oleochemicals market, but rising 162 feedstock costs pose a challenge for 2011 Doris de Guzman provides an overview of the oleochemicals market.
    [Show full text]